applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Industrial Technologies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2021) | Viewed by 36932

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juarez 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico
Interests: lean manufacturing; supply chain optimization; lean supply chain; sustainable supply chain; environmental impact
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Orizaba 94320, Veracruz, Mexico
Interests: supply chain management; supply chain simulation; system logistics and system dynamics modeling
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In a productive system are converging a lot of techniques, tools, methodologies and philosophies applied to industrial production, which come from different sciences, such as engineering and management. However, all them are focus on generating products that must satisfy a need in customers and improve the financial, operational and social performance of the company. One of the most complete production philosophies is Lean Manufacturing (LM), since it integrates several tools, which in turn rely on other techniques. Usually, LM is focused on waste reduction (overproduction, waiting time, transportation, excess processing, inventory, movement and defects) in manufactured products [1], that allow to reduce cost and offer a competitive advantage.

There is no consensus regarding how many LM tools exist or are applied to a productive system. However, all of them are focus on waste elimination and resource optimization, where engineering techniques and basic science are applied [2]. For instance, some LM tools require the application of statistical techniques to perform sampling on a characteristic or attributes in a production line, debug information and to determine a quality situation in a production process, and then make proposals for improvement, which have a foundation in statistical data analysis [3]. Similarly, to offer product guarantees, companies perform tests and accelerated life tests to determine a warranty period for their products, which are based on statistics inferences [4].

Likewise, some models are implemented to production process for attributes optimization (maximize or minimize) and they are based on integral and differential calculus, accelerated approach methods, among others.  In addition, these applications are found in inventory management, in deterministic and stochastic operation research where uncertainty and risk are integrated into the estimates, among others. In other words, lean manufacturing tools apply a wide variety of engineering and applied science techniques.

Furthermore, this Special Issue is aimed to identify tools and methodologies as well as applications that managers and engineers are using to improve their lean manufacturing production process, which allow them to generate a competitive advantage for their companies, as well as keep the company in the globalized market with low-cost products. Additionally, all the selected papers must report on examples or case studies that help to understand any lean manufacturing tool in the real world, where they illustrate how managers are focused on cost reduction, variability reduction, problem solving, and algorithms that seek to optimize resources in production process, among others. Additionally, the examples may come from some sectors such as automotive, aerospace, agricultural, healthcare, tourism, mining, forest, just to mention a few. In addition, the Special Issue is open to receive theoretical, case studies, and real-world contributions in different topics and aspects related to lean manufacturing applications.

[1] R. Henao, W. Sarache, I. Gómez, Lean manufacturing and sustainable performance: Trends and future challenges, Journal of Cleaner Production, 208 (2019) 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.116.

[2] V. Munteanu, A. Ştefănigă, Lean Manufacturing in SMEs in Romania, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238 (2018) 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.028.

[3] a. Kenneth W. Green, a. R. Anthony Inman, a. Victor E. Sower, a. Pamela J. Zelbst, Impact of JIT, TQM and green supply chain practices on environmental sustainability, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, (2019) 26. 10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0015.

[4] F. Wang, H. Li, A practical non-parametric copula algorithm for system reliability with correlations, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 74 (2019) 641-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.05.011.

Prof. Dr. Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz
Prof. Dr. Cuauhtémoc Sánchez Ramírez
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • 5S
  • Andon
  • Bottleneck Analysis
  • Continuous Flow
  • Gemba (The Real Place)
  • Heijunka (Level Scheduling)
  • Hoshin Kanri (Policy Deployment)
  • Jidoka (Autonomation)
  • Just-In-Time (JIT)
  • Kaizen (Continuous Improvement)
  • Kanban (Pull System)
  • KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)
  • Muda (Waste)
  • Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
  • PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act)
  • Poka- Yoke (Error Proofing)
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Single-Minute Exchange of Dies (SMED)
  • Six Big Losses
  • SMART Goals
  • Standardized Work
  • Takt Time
  • Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)
  • Value Stream Mapping and Visual Factory

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

2 pages, 199 KiB  
Editorial
Special Issue on Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020
by Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz and Cuauhtémoc Sánchez Ramírez
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8897; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178897 - 5 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1294
Abstract
At the end of 2018, a call for papers was made for the Special Issue called “Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing Production Systems”, whose objective was to bring together different articles with industrial applications of the different lean manufacturing (LM) tool theories for [...] Read more.
At the end of 2018, a call for papers was made for the Special Issue called “Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing Production Systems”, whose objective was to bring together different articles with industrial applications of the different lean manufacturing (LM) tool theories for problem-solving and case studies that improve the indices of the production systems [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

24 pages, 1755 KiB  
Article
Influence of Bottleneck on Productivity of Production Processes Controlled by Different Pull Control Mechanisms
by Nataša Tošanović and Nedeljko Štefanić
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 1395; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031395 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3066
Abstract
The goal of any lean implementation in production process is achieving better production performances and one of them is productivity. Among many lean principles, pull principle is the most complex to achieve. There are different production control mechanisms for achieving pull and making [...] Read more.
The goal of any lean implementation in production process is achieving better production performances and one of them is productivity. Among many lean principles, pull principle is the most complex to achieve. There are different production control mechanisms for achieving pull and making decision which one to apply can be demanding because sometimes it is not obvious which is the best for specific situation. Many different production parameters influence production process and for one production setting, one control mechanism is the best choice, but for another production setting it might not be. One goal of this study was to research the influence of bottleneck in the production process in regard to achieving better productivity by applying pull principle. Some of the literature considered deals with the topic of bottleneck and pull but focuses only on bottleneck or in addition on one another production parameter and most of the literature studies up to three different pull control mechanisms. One of the objectives of this study was also to fill the research gap in a way to investigate more mechanisms, particularly, according to the literature, those most widely used in various production conditions with emphasis on bottleneck. The advantage of this research is that in addition to the bottleneck, other parameters, namely the number of control cards, variations and processing time are considered. For that reason, simulation experimentation was conducted and as a result regression functions modelling the relationship between productivity and mentioned parameters for four different pull control mechanisms are gained. The analysis showed that the existence of a bottleneck affects the effectiveness of pull mechanisms in terms of productivity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3197 KiB  
Article
System Dynamics and Lean Approach: Development of a Technological Solution in a Regional Product Packaging Company
by Ernesto A. Lagarda-Leyva
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 7938; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11177938 - 27 Aug 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3544
Abstract
This study was performed in a regional product marketing company located in Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, México, where a problem was detected in empirical decision-making due to their recent incorporation into the market. Thus, the objective of this study is the shelf-product production link, [...] Read more.
This study was performed in a regional product marketing company located in Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, México, where a problem was detected in empirical decision-making due to their recent incorporation into the market. Thus, the objective of this study is the shelf-product production link, where the interest is in knowing the behavior of the main variables that influence the system. System dynamics methodology follows six steps: (1) Map the process under study with the value stream map (VSM); (2) Create a causal diagram; (3) Elaborate the Forrester diagram and equations; (4) Validate the current model; (5) Simulate scenarios; (6) Create the graphical user interface. The main results were the design of the scenarios starting from a robust system dynamics model, three scenarios, and the graphical interface. For this purpose, Stella Architect Software was used as it has special attributes to create a graphical user interface. Furthermore, all the elements of the VSM were added under the Lean Startup approach. Significantly, the inadequate management of the materials was detected, which is why the recommendation was to separate the packaging of dry and cold products to care for food innocuousness and the cold chain. Likewise, processing time decreased, reducing material transfer, which was detected by applying a future VSM based on the Lean Startup methodology. The technological solution in this study is a contribution based on social sciences and mathematics (nonlinear equations) using dynamics simulation to observe the complexity of system behavior. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2497 KiB  
Article
PFDA-FMEA, an Integrated Method Improving FMEA Assessment in Product Design
by Pedro Angel García Aguirre, Luis Pérez-Domínguez, David Luviano-Cruz, Jesús Jaime Solano Noriega, Erwin Martínez Gómez and Mauro Callejas-Cuervo
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(4), 1406; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041406 - 4 Feb 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4248
Abstract
Product Design (PD) currently faces challenges in new product development, since the industry is in a rush to introduce new products into the market, with customers demanding products that are faster, cheaper, and free from failure. In addition, global companies are trying to [...] Read more.
Product Design (PD) currently faces challenges in new product development, since the industry is in a rush to introduce new products into the market, with customers demanding products that are faster, cheaper, and free from failure. In addition, global companies are trying to improve their product design risk assessment process to gain advantages over competitors, using proven tools like Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and mixing risk assessment methods. However, with current risks assessment tools and a combination of other methods, there is the opportunity to improve risk analysis. This document aims to reveal a novel integrated method, where FMEA, Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets (PFS), and Dimensional Analysis (DA) are cohesive in one model. The proposed method provides an effective technique to identify risks and remove uncertainty and vagueness of human intervention during risk assessment using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis method. A real-life problem was carried out to illustrate the proposed method. Finally, the study was substantiated by using a correlation and sensitivity analysis, demonstrating the presented integrated method’s usefulness in decision-making and problem-solving. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4250 KiB  
Article
Classification and Quantification of Human Error in Manufacturing: A Case Study in Complex Manual Assembly
by Yaniel Torres, Sylvie Nadeau and Kurt Landau
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020749 - 14 Jan 2021
Cited by 41 | Viewed by 13022
Abstract
Manual assembly operations are sensitive to human errors that can diminish the quality of final products. The paper shows an application of human reliability analysis in a realistic manufacturing context to identify where and why manual assembly errors occur. The techniques SHERPA and [...] Read more.
Manual assembly operations are sensitive to human errors that can diminish the quality of final products. The paper shows an application of human reliability analysis in a realistic manufacturing context to identify where and why manual assembly errors occur. The techniques SHERPA and HEART were used to perform the analysis of human reliability. Three critical tasks were selected for analysis based on quality records: (1) installation of three types of brackets using fasteners, (2) fixation of a data cable to the assembly structure using cushioned loop clamps and (3) installation of cap covers to protect inlets. The identified error modes with SHERPA were: 36 action errors, nine selection errors, eight information retrieval errors and six checking errors. According to HEART, the highest human error probabilities were associated with assembly parts sensitive to geometry-related errors (brackets and cushioned loop clamps). The study showed that perceptually engaging assembly instructions seem to offer the highest potential for error reduction and performance improvement. Other identified areas of action were the improvement of the inspection process and workers’ provision with better tracking and better feedback. Implementation of assembly guidance systems could potentially benefit worker’s performance and decrease assembly errors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3809 KiB  
Article
Research on Improved OEE Measurement Method Based on the Multiproduct Production System
by Xiaoyan Li, Guangfu Liu and Xinyu Hao
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020490 - 6 Jan 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4664
Abstract
The multiproduct production system has been applied extensively in factories worldwide due to the diverse consumption habits of consumers. However, current Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) measurement methods are not suitable for it properly. With the prevailing of multiproduct production system, it is essential [...] Read more.
The multiproduct production system has been applied extensively in factories worldwide due to the diverse consumption habits of consumers. However, current Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) measurement methods are not suitable for it properly. With the prevailing of multiproduct production system, it is essential to measure the effectiveness accurately in this kind of production system. In order to fill this gap, based on analyzing former OEE models, we propose the multiproduct production system effectiveness (MPSE), including the calculating steps and application framework, in this paper using the heuristic method. This MPSE is verified by a case study. The principal results show that the proposed MPSE can significantly enhance overall production effectiveness and improve the measurement of indicators in the multiproduct production system, which enriches the theory of OEE at the theoretical level and proposes a novel way to measure and improve the effectiveness of the multiproduct production system effectively at the practical level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 6192 KiB  
Article
Linear System Identification and Vibration Control of End-Effector for Industrial Robots
by Xiaobiao Shan, Henan Song, Chong Zhang, Guangyan Wang and Jizhuang Fan
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(23), 8537; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238537 - 29 Nov 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2473
Abstract
This paper presents the discrete state space mathematical model of the end-effector in industrial robots and designs the linear-quadratic-Gaussian controller, called LQG controller for short, to solve the low frequency vibration problem. Though simplifying the end-effector as the cantilever beam, this paper uses [...] Read more.
This paper presents the discrete state space mathematical model of the end-effector in industrial robots and designs the linear-quadratic-Gaussian controller, called LQG controller for short, to solve the low frequency vibration problem. Though simplifying the end-effector as the cantilever beam, this paper uses the subspace identification method to determine the output dynamic response data and establishes the state space model. Experimentally comparing the influences of different input excitation signals, Chirp sequences from 0 Hz to 100 Hz are used as the final estimation signal and the excitation signal. The LQG controller is designed and simulated to achieve the low frequency vibration suppression of the structure. The results show that the suppression system can effectively suppress the fundamental natural frequency and lower vibration of end-effector. The vibration suppression percentage is 95%, and the vibration amplitude is successfully reduced from ±20 μm to ±1 μm. The present work provides an effective method to suppress the low frequency vibration of the end-effector for industrial robots. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3281 KiB  
Article
Dynamic Model and Graphical User Interface: A Solution for the Distribution Process of Regional Products
by Ernesto A. Lagarda-Leyva, Alfredo Bueno-Solano, Harvey P. Vea-Valdez and Daniel O. Machado
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(13), 4481; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134481 - 28 Jun 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3285
Abstract
Organizations in the agroindustry sector face shorter delivery schedules; therefore, they are seeking ways to conduct more effective and less costly product distribution. Supply chain management efforts have focused on improving the flow of both products and information. Thus, the aim of this [...] Read more.
Organizations in the agroindustry sector face shorter delivery schedules; therefore, they are seeking ways to conduct more effective and less costly product distribution. Supply chain management efforts have focused on improving the flow of both products and information. Thus, the aim of this case study was to build a graphical user interface to enable decision-making based on quantitative information for a food distribution process. The problem to be solved was associated with the development of a technological solution to reduce and control variations in transportation times, delivery costs and capacities in cold and dry food distribution. An eight-step system for a dynamics methodology was used: (1) distribution process analysis, (2) route description, (3) variable and parameter description, (4) causal loop diagram creation, (5) current model simulation, (6) validation, (7) quantitative scenario construction based on key performance indicators, and (8) graphical user interface development. The main findings of this research were that the graphical user interface and simulation showed information that represented on average 56.49% of the total distribution costs regarding fuel and that maintenance and tire wearing costs had less of an impact on total costs, representing 9.21% and 3.66% of the total costs, respectively. Additionally, the technological solution—created for the supply chain in the distribution process against the background of changes in policies—makes it possible to improve decision-making based on different scenarios supported by a graphical interface according to key performance indicators. This solution could be used by different organizations who aim to reduce logistics and transportation costs. The main implications of this research were the available and organized information and the restructuring of the distribution process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering to Lean Manufacturing and Production Systems 2020)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop