Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles as Predictors of Behavior

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Biological Psychiatry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2024) | Viewed by 1501

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
2. Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research, Dr. Pifarré Foundation, 25198 Lleida, Spain
Interests: personality traits; cognitive abilities; psychological assessment; mental health; personality disorders

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Deparment of Psychology, University of Lleida, 25006 Lleida, Spain
2. Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research, Dr. Pifarré Foundation, 25198 Lleida, Spain
Interests: the biological basis of personality and behavior; psychological assessment; mental health and personality disorders; cognitive neuroscience

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The ability to make decisions plays a vital role in human behavior, as it allows us to consider options under conditions where there are no intrinsically correct choices to guide our selections, and all options present potential rewards and punishments. Under these common scenarios of uncertainty, both normal personality trait models and decision-making styles play a role in the final behavior chosen by individuals. In fact, the interplay between both kinds of constructs could be essential to providing us with a more fine-grained picture of the individual differences in the way people behave in many situations with an impact on people’s lives, such as economic decisions, addictive behaviors, vocational and career decisions, and many others. The present Special Issue aims to unravel the contributions from both kinds of constructs by analyzing the convergent and divergent validity of personality traits and decision-making styles, describing the common and different cognitive and biological basis of both concepts, and, especially, comparing the predictive and incremental validity of them in different settings.

Prof. Dr. Luis F. Garcia
Prof. Dr. Anton Aluja
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • personality traits
  • impulsive-disinhibited personality
  • decision-making styles
  • addictive behaviors
  • lack of control
  • decision-making process and behaviors

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 1241 KiB  
Article
The Role of Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles in Career Decision-Making Difficulties
by Mine Aydemir Dev and Nuran Bayram Arlı
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020159 - 1 Feb 2025
Viewed by 344
Abstract
Career decisions are one of the most important decisions individuals make in their lives. These decisions are multifaceted and complex, making them a challenging process, particularly for students. This creates obstacles for students navigating the career choice process. The aim of this study [...] Read more.
Career decisions are one of the most important decisions individuals make in their lives. These decisions are multifaceted and complex, making them a challenging process, particularly for students. This creates obstacles for students navigating the career choice process. The aim of this study is to examine career decision-making difficulties within the framework of personality traits and decision-making styles. The target group of this study is undergraduate students studying at a public university. For this research, we collected data through online questionnaire forms. The questionnaire comprised demographic questions and three scales: career decision-making difficulties, personality traits, and decision-making styles. A total of 505 students (63.2% female) participated in the questionnaire. The research model was tested using path analysis. We also conducted network analysis in order to better understand and visualize the relationships between the sub-dimensions of the scales. The findings showed significant direct relationships between career decision-making difficulties and personality traits (conscientiousness, openness, neuroticism, and agreeableness) and decision-making styles (rational, dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous). According to the path analysis result, neurotic personality traits were positively correlated with career decision-making difficulties, while openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were negatively correlated with them. The relationship between dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous decision-making styles and career decision-making difficulties was positive. These results provide valuable insights into the factors that shape career decisions, helping students make more informed choices and manage their career paths effectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1572 KiB  
Article
Decision-Making Styles, Prosociality, and Behavioral Difficulties in Adolescent Offenders: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction and Emotional Experiences
by Arcadio de Jesús Cardona-Isaza, Inmaculada Montoya-Castilla and Angela Trujillo
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(1), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010080 - 17 Jan 2025
Viewed by 521
Abstract
Research on adolescents suggests that decision-making styles, emotional experiences, and life satisfaction play a crucial role in emotional and behavioral difficulties and the development of prosocial behaviors. This study analyzed the relationship between decision-making styles, prosociality, and difficulties among adolescent offenders, as well [...] Read more.
Research on adolescents suggests that decision-making styles, emotional experiences, and life satisfaction play a crucial role in emotional and behavioral difficulties and the development of prosocial behaviors. This study analyzed the relationship between decision-making styles, prosociality, and difficulties among adolescent offenders, as well as the mediating role of life satisfaction and emotional experiences in this relationship. A total of 457 adolescents aged from 14 to 19 years (M = 16.23; S.D. = 1.31; 32.2% female) participated in this study. The variables of interest were assessed using self-reports and descriptive, reliability, correlational, predictive, and mediation analyses were performed. A significant association was found between the study variables. Non-rational decision-making styles and negative emotional experiences influenced difficulties, whereas rational decision-making, life satisfaction, and positive emotional experiences influenced prosocial behavior. Furthermore, the results show that the relationship between rational decision-making and prosocial behavior is mediated by life satisfaction, emotional balance, and positive emotional experiences. Similarly, negative emotional experiences mediated the relationship between a hypervigilance decision-making style and emotional and behavioral difficulties. The results of this study indicate the importance of intervening in decision-making styles, emotional management, and life satisfaction in offending adolescents to decrease behavioral and emotional difficulties and favor prosocial behavior. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop