Frontiers in the Immunology of Brain Tumors

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neuro-oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (16 January 2022) | Viewed by 6518

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
Interests: brain tumors; immunotherapy; Alzheimer’s disease; imaging
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Antigenic differences between the normal and malignant cells of cancer patients form the rationale for clinical immunotherapeutic strategies. While the central nervous system has traditionally been thought of as an immune-privileged site, a number of studies have been conducted that demonstrate the potential efficacy of immunotherapy in management of primary and secondary brain tumors. A variety of strategies have been used to increase the immunogenetic properties of vaccine therapies for brain tumors. One emerging strategy in the treatment of tumors involves the stimulation of an immunologic response against neoplastic cells. Tumor cells may evade immune responses by disrupting the expression of antigens or major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The immune response can be augmented by genetic modification of tumor cells to secrete cytokines, including IL-2, GM-CSF, and interferon-γ. Alternatively, one can genetically modify the tumor cells to express co-stimulatory molecules such as B7. The modification of neoplastic cells taken directly from tumor-bearing patients may be difficult. An alternative cell type that can be used for therapeutic immunizations is the dendritic cell (DC), which is a specialized antigen-presenting cell. Preclinical studies have indicated that immunization with DC pulsed with tumor cell antigens can stimulate a cytotoxic T cell response that is tumor-specific and engenders protective immunity against CNS tumors. Another strategy is to transfect genomic DNA from the malignant cells into a fibroblast cell line, which results in stable integration and expression of the transferred DNA. Immunization of tumor-bearing mice with the DNA-based vaccine results in the induction of cell-mediated immunity directed toward the type of tumor from which the DNA was obtained along with prolongation of survival. Finally, regulation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are capable of blocking molecules involved in inhibiting immune cells, can result in a stimulation of the T-cell response against various tumors, including brain tumors.

The ultimate goal of cancer therapy is the elimination of every remaining tumor cell from the patient. It is unlikely that a single form of therapy is capable of achieving this goal. However, immunotherapy in combination with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy will likely find a place as a new and important means of treatment for patients with brain tumors. Although the utilization of immunotherapeutic strategies has proven efficacious against a variety of tumors, immunotherapy for the treatment of brain tumors has resulted in mixed success, with conflicting research findings. Certainly, more work in this field is critically needed. For this Special Issue, papers are being solicited that explore the potential of different immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of brain tumors along with related aspects of tumor immunotherapy.

Dr. Terry Lichtor
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • brain tumors
  • gliomas
  • immunotherapy
  • gene therapy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 6843 KiB  
Article
Molecular and Clinical Characterization of a Novel Prognostic and Immunologic Biomarker GPSM3 in Low-Grade Gliomas
by Ming Wang, Jiaoying Jia, Yan Cui, Yong Peng and Yugang Jiang
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(11), 1529; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11111529 - 18 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2306
Abstract
Background: as the most common malignancy of the central nervous system, low-grade glioma (LGG) patients suffered a poor prognosis. Tumor microenvironment, especially immune components, plays an important role in the progression of tumors. Thus, it is critical to explore the key immune-related genes, [...] Read more.
Background: as the most common malignancy of the central nervous system, low-grade glioma (LGG) patients suffered a poor prognosis. Tumor microenvironment, especially immune components, plays an important role in the progression of tumors. Thus, it is critical to explore the key immune-related genes, a comprehensive understanding of the TME in LGG helps us find novel cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Methods: the GPSM3 expression level and the correlations between clinical characteristics and GPSM3 levels were analyzed with the data from CGGA and TCGA dataset. Univariate and multivariate cox regression model were built to predict the prognosis of LGG patients with multiple factors. Then the correlation between GPSM3 with immune cell infiltration was explored by ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT and TIMER2.0. At last, the correlation analyzed between GPSM3 expression and immune checkpoint related genes were also analyzed. Results: GPSM3 expression was overexpressed in LGG and negatively correlated to the GPSM3 DNA methylation. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that GPSM3 expression was an independent prognostic factor in LGG patients. Functional characterization of GPSM3 revealed that it was associated with many immune processes to tumor cells. GPSM3 expression was positive related to the immune score, Stromal scores and ESTIMATE scores, but negative related to the Tumor purity. Immune features in the TME of GPSM3-high LGG group is characterized by a higher infiltrating of regulatory T cells, neutrophils, macrophages M2, and a lower proportion of monocytes than to the GPSM3-low group. Furthermore, GPSM3 expression exhibited significant correlations with the immune checkpoint-related genes, especially PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA4 and TIM3. Conclusions: these findings proved that GPSM3 could serve as a prognostic biomarker and potential immunotherapy target for LGG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in the Immunology of Brain Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 873 KiB  
Review
Oncolytic Virotherapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases, a Potential New Treatment Paradigm?
by Sauson Soldozy, Kathleen M. Mulligan, David X. Zheng, Melissa A. Levoska, Christopher R. Cullison, Turki Elarjani, Daniel G. Eichberg, Leonel E. Ampie, Ashish H. Shah, Kaan Yağmurlu, Mark E. Shaffrey, Jeffrey F. Scott and Ricardo J. Komotar
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(10), 1260; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101260 - 23 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3524
Abstract
Introduction: Melanoma brain metastases remain a devastating disease process with poor prognosis. Recently, there has been a surge in studies demonstrating the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy for brain tumor treatment. Given their specificity and amenability to genetic modification, the authors explore the possible [...] Read more.
Introduction: Melanoma brain metastases remain a devastating disease process with poor prognosis. Recently, there has been a surge in studies demonstrating the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy for brain tumor treatment. Given their specificity and amenability to genetic modification, the authors explore the possible role of oncolytic virotherapy as a potential treatment option for patients with melanoma brain metastases. Methods: A comprehensive literature review including both preclinical and clinical evidence of oncolytic virotherapy for the treatment of melanoma brain metastasis was performed. Results: Oncolytic virotherapy, specifically T-VEC (Imlygic™), was approved for the treatment of melanoma in 2015. Recent clinical trials demonstrate promising anti-tumor changes in patients who have received T-VEC; however, there is little evidence for its use in metastatic brain disease based on the existing literature. To date, only two single cases utilizing virotherapy in patients with metastatic brain melanoma have been reported, specifically in patients with treatment refractory disease. Currently, there is not sufficient data to support the use of T-VEC or other viruses for intracranial metastatic melanoma. In developing a virotherapy treatment paradigm for melanoma brain metastases, several factors must be considered, including route of administration, need to bypass the blood–brain barrier, viral tumor infectivity, and risk of adverse events. Conclusions: Evidence for oncolytic virotherapy treatment of melanoma is limited primarily to T-VEC, with a noticeable paucity of data in the literature with respect to brain tumor metastasis. Given the promising findings of virotherapy for other brain tumor types, oncolytic virotherapy has great potential to offer benefits to patients afflicted with melanoma brain metastases and warrants further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in the Immunology of Brain Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop