Advances in Memory Control

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Behavioral Neuroscience".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2022) | Viewed by 13618

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain
Interests: episodic memory; executive control; motivated forgetting; cognitive development; aging

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
Interests: aging; individual differences; working memory; cognitive training; cognitive inhibition; dementia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The human brain has evolved so that it can acquire, retain, and use huge and complex amounts of information for a variety of purposes. Thus, for example, long-term memory is crucial for remembering events and knowing conceptual facts about the world, but it also plays a key role in language, decision making, reasoning, or planning future acts. Importantly, decades of research have shown that human memory can be understood in terms of systems (i.e., declarative vs. nondeclarative memory), stages (i.e., encoding, consolidation, retrieval) and types of information involved (i.e., personal events, facts, skills). Over the years, however, it has also become clear that effortful (top-down) control processes contribute to the regulation of information in memory. Mnemonic strategies and metacognition were originally thought of as control processes that could be trained to enhance cognitive abilities more generally. More recently, the interplay between executive control processes and distinct memory systems has drawn researchers’ attention. Thus, for example, it has been proposed that inhibitory control is recruited to either disrupt encoding or stop the retrieval of unwanted memories (which can lead to motivated forgetting), and that executive mechanisms can shape semantic retrieval according to the task or context. Similarly, a variety of control processes are thought to prevent irrelevant/outdated information from occupying working memory and explain individual and age differences in working memory performance. Nonetheless, there is still the need to understand the underpinning control mechanisms of memory systems to sustain/improve quality of life across the lifespan and even in clinical conditions.

The aim of this Special Issue is to gather cutting-edge research looking into the cognitive and neural mechanisms allowing memory regulation (i.e., by modulating information accessibility in declarative memory or information availability in working memory). Manuscripts reporting studies on motivated forgetting, episodic memory, working memory, memory illusions, prospective memory, or executive control training are especially welcome as long as their findings contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie memory control and its enhancement. In addition, experimental research investigating these issues in the context of lifespan development (i.e., children, older adults), clinical (including learning disabilities in children) or psychiatric conditions and everyday functioning are also appreciated. Submitted manuscripts are expected to report research involving the use of behavioral, neuroimaging, neurophysiological, or neuromodulation techniques.

Research articles, review articles, as well as short communications are invited.

Prof. Dr. Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza
Guest Editors

Prof. Dr. Erika Borella
Co-Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Inhibitory control
  • Interference control
  • Motivated forgetting
  • Thought substitution
  • Individual differences (including age differences and clinical conditions)
  • Cognitive training
  • Emotional memories
  • Episodic memory
  • Working memory
  • Prospective memory

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1966 KiB  
Article
Where Is My Mind…? The Link between Mind Wandering and Prospective Memory
by Jean-Charles Girardeau, Marco Sperduti, Philippe Blondé and Pascale Piolino
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(9), 1139; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091139 - 26 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2814
Abstract
Mind wandering (MW) is a common feature of the human experience occurring when our attention shifts from the task at hand to inner thoughts. MW seems to be often future-oriented and could be used to help people to carry out their planned actions [...] Read more.
Mind wandering (MW) is a common feature of the human experience occurring when our attention shifts from the task at hand to inner thoughts. MW seems to be often future-oriented and could be used to help people to carry out their planned actions (Prospective Memory PM). Here, we tested the link between MW and the ability to perform PM intentions. We assessed MW and PM over 15 days using experience-sampling probes via mobile phone (226 participants) associated with a naturalistic PM task. We confirmed that MW occupies a significant proportion of our mental activity (40%). This time seems to be mainly used to project ourselves into the future (64%), whether to anticipate and imagine the long term (20%) or to plan daily obligations (44%). Intriguingly, only past-oriented thoughts (9%) predict the PM performance. We discuss the possible functional role played by MW in maintaining intentions in mind. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Memory Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 7345 KiB  
Article
Doing Experimental Psychological Research from Remote: How Alerting Differently Impacts Online vs. Lab Setting
by Fiorella Del Popolo Cristaldi, Umberto Granziol, Irene Bariletti and Giovanni Mento
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(8), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081061 - 10 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2247
Abstract
Due to pandemic-imposed restrictions on lab-based research, we have recently witnessed a flourishing of online studies in experimental psychology, based on the collection of fine behavioral measures such as reaction times (RTs) and accuracy. However, it remains unclear whether participants’ alerting levels may [...] Read more.
Due to pandemic-imposed restrictions on lab-based research, we have recently witnessed a flourishing of online studies in experimental psychology, based on the collection of fine behavioral measures such as reaction times (RTs) and accuracy. However, it remains unclear whether participants’ alerting levels may have a different impact on behavioral performance in the online vs. lab setting. In this work we administered online and in-lab the dynamic temporal prediction (DTP) task, which requires an implicit modulation of participants’ alerting by alternating experimental conditions implying either slower or faster response rates. We then compared data distribution, RTs, accuracy, and time-on-task effects across the adult lifespan between the settings. We replicated online and across the whole age range considered (19–69 y) all the task-specific effects already found in-lab (both in terms of RTs and accuracy) beyond the overall RTs delay typical of the online setting. Moreover, we found an interaction between the setting and task-specific features so that participants showed slower RTs only in experimental conditions implying a less urgent response rate, while no RTs delay and a slight accuracy increase emerged in faster conditions. Thus, the online setting has been shown to be methodologically sound in eliciting comparable effects to those found in-lab. Moreover, behavioral performance seems to be more sensitive to task-induced alerting shifts in the online as compared to the lab setting, leading to either a heightened or reduced efficiency depending on a faster or slower response rate of experimental conditions, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Memory Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2005 KiB  
Article
Emotional Context Shapes the Serial Position Curve
by Fabio Giovannelli, Iglis Innocenti, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Elisa Tatti, Stefano F. Cappa and Simone Rossi
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(5), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050581 - 29 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2699
Abstract
Emotional contexts affect memory processes. However, the impact of contextual priming as a function of the emotional valence on the recall of neutral information is not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate how a conditioning of emotional context [...] Read more.
Emotional contexts affect memory processes. However, the impact of contextual priming as a function of the emotional valence on the recall of neutral information is not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate how a conditioning of emotional context during encoding may influence the subsequent memory of otherwise neutral materials in a well-established phenomenon as the serial position effect. Participants performed a free recall task for neutral words in three conditions: (i) word list alone; (ii) word list coupled with positive or neutral images; and (iii) word list coupled with negative or neutral images. Images were presented before each word stimulus. In three different experiments, the emotional context during the word list presentation was manipulated separately for primacy and recency clusters, and for the middle words (‘middlecy’). Emotional context affects free recall of neutral stimuli, changing the serial position curve effect across conditions. Namely, emotional images presented in the primacy and recency clusters worsen accuracy, whereas their occurrence in the ‘middlecy’ cluster reduces the oblivion. The present findings show that the typical pattern related to the serial position curve for neutral information can be shaped by the conditioning of emotional context. Findings have implications in medical-legal contexts in the case of the recollection of events with high emotional content. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Memory Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2515 KiB  
Article
ERP Correlates of Prospective Memory and Cue Focality in Children
by Ana B. Cejudo, Cristina López-Rojas, Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza and María Teresa Bajo
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(5), 533; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050533 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2305
Abstract
Prospective memory (PM) is essential in the everyday activities of children because it involves remembering intentions for the future, such as doing their homework or bringing written parental permissions to school. Developmental studies have shown increases in PM performance throughout childhood, but the [...] Read more.
Prospective memory (PM) is essential in the everyday activities of children because it involves remembering intentions for the future, such as doing their homework or bringing written parental permissions to school. Developmental studies have shown increases in PM performance throughout childhood, but the specific processes underlying this development are still under debate. In the present study, event-related potentials were used to examine whether the focality of the PM task is related to the PM increments by testing two groups of children (first and last cycle of primary school) and assessing differences in N300 (cue detection), frontal positivity (switching), parietal positivity (retrieval of the intention) and frontal slow waves (monitoring of the retrieved intention). The results showed significant differences in focality in the group of older children but no differences in any of the components for their younger counterparts. In addition, the differences between prospective and ongoing trials were smaller for younger than older children. These findings suggest that the ability to adjust attentional strategies, monitor, switch and retrieve the intention develops across childhood and affects PM performance in attentionally demanding conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Memory Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 587 KiB  
Article
In Older Adults, Perceived Stress and Self-Efficacy Are Associated with Verbal Fluency, Reasoning, and Prospective Memory (Moderated by Socioeconomic Position)
by Ulrike Rimmele, Nicola Ballhausen, Andreas Ihle and Matthias Kliegel
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(2), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020244 - 10 Feb 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2353
Abstract
Despite evidence that stress relates negatively to cognitive functioning in older adults, little is known how appraisal of stress and socioeconomic meso-level factors influence different types of cognitive functions in older adults. Here, we assess the relationship between perceived stress (PSS scale) and [...] Read more.
Despite evidence that stress relates negatively to cognitive functioning in older adults, little is known how appraisal of stress and socioeconomic meso-level factors influence different types of cognitive functions in older adults. Here, we assess the relationship between perceived stress (PSS scale) and a battery of cognitive functions, including prospective memory in 1054 older adults (65+). A moderator analysis assessed whether this relationship varies with neighborhood socioeconomic status using an area-based measure of Socioeconomic Position (SEP). Perceived stress was associated with worse processing speed, verbal fluency, and inductive reasoning. The perceived self-efficacy subscale of the PSS is related to better performance in these measures. Higher self-efficacy was also associated with better prospective memory; this relationship was more pronounced for people with high neighborhood SEP. These findings indicate that not only do perceived stress and perceived self-efficacy relate to cognitive functioning in older age but also that neighborhood SEP is a moderator of this relationship. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Memory Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop