Cancer Biomarkers—Detection and Evaluation of Response to Therapy

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Biomarkers".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 1724

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Border Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
Interests: chemotherapy; cancer biology; metronomic chemotherapy; metastasis; immunotherapy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Border Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
Interests: cancer biomarkers; cancer autoimmunity (auto-antibodies)

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cancer biomarkers are increasingly important in the detection of earlier stages of disease; they are essential, and still in need of discovery, in the optimal dosing of anti-cancer drugs, predicting treatment-related toxicity, and selecting therapies that can most benefit either individual patients or subgroups with a particular cancer.

This Special issue will explore past and present biomarkers, novel biomarkers, and the use of biomarkers with different diagnostic and treatment options to improve the detection and management of cancer.

Dr. Giulio Francia
Dr. Jianying Zhang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomarkers
  • cancer detection
  • biomarkers of response to antineoplastic drugs
  • biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy
  • biomarkers for targeted therapies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1876 KiB  
Article
Reduction of Blood Oxidative Stress Following Colorectal Cancer Resection
by Katsuji Sawai, Takanori Goi, Youhei Kimura and Kenji Koneri
Cancers 2024, 16(20), 3550; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16203550 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 560
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is a major global health burden, with surgical resection being the standard treatment aimed at curative tumor removal. Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in colorectal cancer progression and prognosis. This study hypothesized that physical removal of colorectal cancer, a [...] Read more.
Background: Colorectal cancer is a major global health burden, with surgical resection being the standard treatment aimed at curative tumor removal. Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in colorectal cancer progression and prognosis. This study hypothesized that physical removal of colorectal cancer, a primary source of oxidative stress, would reduce blood levels of reactive oxygen metabolite derivatives (d-ROMs), a marker of oxidative stress, and biologic antioxidant potential (BAP) levels, a marker of antioxidant potential. Methods: This study included 123 patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer. d-ROM and BAP levels were measured before and one month after surgery. Results: The clinicopathological analysis showed a correlation between preoperative d-ROM levels and tumor size (p < 0.001). This study confirmed a significant reduction in d-ROM levels following tumor resection, indicating reduced systemic oxidative stress. The reduction was significant in stages II and III, but not in stage I. The d-ROM ratio before and after tumor resection was significantly higher in cases with positive lymph node metastasis and larger tumor size. BAP levels showed no significant changes post-surgery. Conclusions: These results suggest that d-ROMs could serve as a valuable biomarker for monitoring tumor burden and surgical efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Biomarkers—Detection and Evaluation of Response to Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1528 KiB  
Article
Can Delta Radiomics Improve the Prediction of Best Overall Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival of Melanoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?
by Felix Peisen, Annika Gerken, Alessa Hering, Isabel Dahm, Konstantin Nikolaou, Sergios Gatidis, Thomas K. Eigentler, Teresa Amaral, Jan H. Moltz and Ahmed E. Othman
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2669; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152669 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 866
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of metastatic melanoma is increasing, necessitating the identification of patients who do not benefit from immunotherapy. This study aimed to develop a radiomic biomarker based on the segmentation of all metastases at baseline and the first follow-up CT for the [...] Read more.
Background: The prevalence of metastatic melanoma is increasing, necessitating the identification of patients who do not benefit from immunotherapy. This study aimed to develop a radiomic biomarker based on the segmentation of all metastases at baseline and the first follow-up CT for the endpoints best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), encompassing various immunotherapies. Additionally, this study investigated whether reducing the number of segmented metastases per patient affects predictive capacity. Methods: The total tumour load, excluding cerebral metastases, from 146 baseline and 146 first follow-up CTs of melanoma patients treated with first-line immunotherapy was volumetrically segmented. Twenty-one random forest models were trained and compared for the endpoints BOR; PFS at 6, 9, and 12 months; and OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, using as input either only clinical parameters, whole-tumour-load delta radiomics plus clinical parameters, or delta radiomics from the largest ten metastases plus clinical parameters. Results: The whole-tumour-load delta radiomics model performed best for BOR (AUC 0.81); PFS at 6, 9, and 12 months (AUC 0.82, 0.80, and 0.77); and OS at 6 months (AUC 0.74). The model using delta radiomics from the largest ten metastases performed best for OS at 9 and 12 months (AUC 0.71 and 0.75). Although the radiomic models were numerically superior to the clinical model, statistical significance was not reached. Conclusions: The findings indicate that delta radiomics may offer additional value for predicting BOR, PFS, and OS in metastatic melanoma patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy. Despite its complexity, volumetric whole-tumour-load segmentation could be advantageous. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Biomarkers—Detection and Evaluation of Response to Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop