Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Biomarkers".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2022) | Viewed by 27258

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
Interests: melanoma

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Medicine, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy
Interests: melanoma

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Before the recent advances in the treatment landscape of metastatic melanoma, disease outcomes were poor, with a median overall survival of approximately 6 months and 5-year survival rate of ~5–7%. Two therapeutic strategies have paved the way toward substantially improving the overall response rate and melanoma-specific survival: i) the modulation of the immune system with monoclonal antibodies acting as immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeting either the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed cell-death 1 (PD-1); and ii) BRAF and MEK inhibitors that target the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which is constitutively active in melanoma harboring BRAF V600 mutations.

Both ICIs and BRAF/MEKi combinations are recommended as 1st- or 2nd-line therapies for advanced melanoma as well as in adjuvant settings. Nevertheless, both strategies are expensive, and their long-term benefit is limited to a subgroup of patients.

With regard to BRAF/MEK, PFS and OS are approximately 12–14 months and 24–33 months, respectively, reflecting the development of resistance mechanisms in the majority of patients. From a molecular point of view, acquired resistance is related to a reactivation of the MAPK pathway. From a clinical point of view, on the other hand, a pooled analysis helped to identify routinely used clinical parameters as predictors of outcome in patients treated with BRAFi and MEKi in the context of clinical trials. Similarly, although single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy has demonstrated promising clinical activity in a large proportion of metastatic melanoma patients, primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapies can develop—and in the adjuvant setting, 30% of patients receiving anti PD-1 therapy still relapse. Pursuing treatment strategies to overcome primary and acquired resistance is thus important in order to further improve patients’ outcome. Moreover, there is an increasing need for biomarkers helping in the selection of patients who can achieve long-term benefits from the proper selection of therapeutic strategy, as well as for the possible prediction of adverse events related to immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

In this Special Issue, we will collect high-quality original articles as well as authoritative review papers summarizing new, exciting data or strong overviews of biomarkers in melanoma patients, both in early and advanced disease. This Special Issue will help clinicians, scientists, and translational researchers to identify the most promising biomarkers in melanoma. This could ultimately help us to develop combination treatment strategies in melanoma based on a solid translational basic and clinical background.

Prof. Dr. Piotr L. Rutkowski
Prof. Dr. Mario Mandalà
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1580 KiB  
Article
Digital Quantification of Intratumoral CD8+ T-Cells Predicts Relapse and Unfavorable Outcome in Uveal Melanoma
by Ozge Hurdogan, Francesco De Logu, Francesca Galli, Samuray Tuncer, Filippo Ugolini, Sara Simi, Francesca Portelli, Romina Nassini, Daniela Massi and Nesimi Buyukbabani
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5959; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235959 - 2 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1683
Abstract
Although it is a disease that occurs mainly in the Caucasian population, uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. Here, we used digital pathology and image analysis for the diagnosis of UM and the prediction of the prognosis. [...] Read more.
Although it is a disease that occurs mainly in the Caucasian population, uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. Here, we used digital pathology and image analysis for the diagnosis of UM and the prediction of the prognosis. Our retrospective study included a total of 404 histopathological slides from 101 patients. A digital image acquisition and quantitative analysis of tissue immune biomarkers (CD4, CD8, CD68, CD163) were performed. A negative impact of the intratumoral CD8 positive cell density higher than 13.3 cells/mm2 was detected for both RFS (HR 2.08, 95% Cl 1.09 to 3.99, p = 0.027) and OS (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.58 to 6.88, p = 0.001). Moreover, we confirmed that older age and stage III were independent negative prognostic factors for both RFS and OS. Our results suggest that a specific distribution profile of CD8 in UM might predict the risk of relapse and death, with potential implications for determining which subgroups of UMs are amenable to specific pharmacological treatment regimens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1560 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Potential of the Baseline Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Stage I to III Melanoma Patients
by Thilo Gambichler, Andreas Stang, Rita Mansour, Christina H. Scheel, Celine Nick, Nessr Abu Rached, Jürgen C. Becker and Laura Susok
Cancers 2022, 14(18), 4410; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184410 - 11 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1987
Abstract
Prognostic biomarkers derived from complete blood count (CBC) have received marked interest as an indirect measure of the inflammatory pressure in cancers such as metastatic melanoma. Here, we evaluated the novel pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and the frequently assessed neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in a [...] Read more.
Prognostic biomarkers derived from complete blood count (CBC) have received marked interest as an indirect measure of the inflammatory pressure in cancers such as metastatic melanoma. Here, we evaluated the novel pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and the frequently assessed neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in a large cohort of patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM) without distant metastases (stages I to III). PIV and NLR were calculated at CM diagnosis. Healthy controls were also included. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate crude survival probabilities and used Cox proportional hazards regression for multiple adjustment of hazard ratios. We observed that higher PIV (HR: 1.72, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.58 and HR: 1.696, 95% CI 1.029 to 2.795, respectively) and NLR (HR: 1.70, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.62) values were associated with CM relapse and CM-specific death in the crude analysis. However, when adjusting for potential confounders, in particular age and tumor thickness, the total effect of PIV and NLR on CM-relapse-free (HR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.98 and HR: 1.26, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.98, respectively) and CM-specific survival (HR: 1.36, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.30 and HR: 1.37, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.33, respectively) was substantially reduced. However, both PIV and NLR were positively correlated with age and tumor thickness, which are important independent predictors for CM relapse and CM-specific death. In conclusion, in stage I to III CM patients PIV as well as NLR appear to be confounded by age and tumor thickness and probably have no potential to further improve the prediction of survival of stage I to III CM patients beyond standard prognostic factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 6398 KiB  
Article
Bright-Field Multiplex Immunohistochemistry Assay for Tumor Microenvironment Evaluation in Melanoma Tissues
by Filippo Ugolini, Elisa Pasqualini, Sara Simi, Gianna Baroni and Daniela Massi
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3682; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153682 - 28 Jul 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3303
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in melanoma development, progression and response to treatment. As many of the most relevant TME cell phenotypes are defined by the simultaneous detection of more than two markers, the bright-field (BF) multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) technique [...] Read more.
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in melanoma development, progression and response to treatment. As many of the most relevant TME cell phenotypes are defined by the simultaneous detection of more than two markers, the bright-field (BF) multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) technique has been introduced for the quantitative assessment and evaluation of the relative spatial distances between immune cells and melanoma cells. In the current study, we aimed to validate BF multiplex IHC techniques in the Ventana Discovery Ultra Immunostainer to be applied to the evaluation of the TME in variably pigmented melanoma tissues. The BF multiplex IHC staining was performed using different combinations of six immune-cell markers—CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68 and CD163—and the melanoma cell marker SOX10. Our results show that the BF double IHC Yellow/Purple protocol guarantees the maximum contrast in all the cell populations tested and the combination SOX10 (Green), CD8 (Yellow) and CD163 (Purple) of the BF triple IHC protocol ensures the best contrast and discrimination between the three stained cell populations. Furthermore, the labeled cells were clearly distinct and easily identifiable using the image analysis software. Our standardized BF IHC multiplex protocols can be used to better assess the immune contexts of melanoma patients with potential applications to drive therapeutic decisions within clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2964 KiB  
Article
Blood Eosinophils Are Associated with Efficacy of Targeted Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
by Simone Wendlinger, Jonas Wohlfarth, Sophia Kreft, Claudia Siedel, Teresa Kilian, Ulrich Dischinger, Markus V. Heppt, Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht, Friedegund Meier, Matthias Goebeler, Dirk Schadendorf, Anja Gesierich, Corinna Kosnopfel and Bastian Schilling
Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2294; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092294 - 4 May 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3249
Abstract
Background: Eosinophils appear to contribute to the efficacy of immunotherapy and their frequency was suggested as a predictive biomarker. Whether this observation could be transferred to patients treated with targeted therapy remains unknown. Methods: Blood and serum samples of healthy controls and 216 [...] Read more.
Background: Eosinophils appear to contribute to the efficacy of immunotherapy and their frequency was suggested as a predictive biomarker. Whether this observation could be transferred to patients treated with targeted therapy remains unknown. Methods: Blood and serum samples of healthy controls and 216 patients with advanced melanoma were prospectively and retrospectively collected. Freshly isolated eosinophils were phenotypically characterized by flow cytometry and co-cultured in vitro with melanoma cells to assess cytotoxicity. Soluble serum markers and peripheral blood counts were used for correlative studies. Results: Eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, as well as phenotypic characteristics, were similar when comparing healthy donors and patients. However, high relative pre-treatment eosinophil counts were significantly associated with response to MAPKi (p = 0.013). Eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells is dose-dependent and requires proximity of eosinophils and their target in vitro. Treatment with targeted therapy in the presence of eosinophils results in an additive tumoricidal effect. Additionally, melanoma cells affected eosinophil phenotype upon co-culture. Conclusion: High pre-treatment eosinophil counts in advanced melanoma patients were associated with a significantly improved response to MAPKi. Functionally, eosinophils show potent cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, which can be reinforced by MAPKi. Further studies are needed to unravel the molecular mechanisms of our observations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2015 KiB  
Article
High GILT Expression Is Associated with Improved Survival in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition
by Anngela C. Adams, Elizabeth S. Borden, Anne M. Macy, Nick Thomson, Haiyan Cui, Mark I. Gimbel, Melissa A. Wilson, Kenneth H. Buetow, Denise J. Roe, David J. DiCaudo, Jade Homsi and Karen Taraszka Hastings
Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2200; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092200 - 28 Apr 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2360
Abstract
Gamma-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT) is critical for MHC class II restricted presentation of multiple melanoma antigens. There is variable GILT protein expression in malignant melanocytes in melanoma specimens. High GILT mRNA expression in melanoma specimens is associated with improved overall survival, before [...] Read more.
Gamma-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT) is critical for MHC class II restricted presentation of multiple melanoma antigens. There is variable GILT protein expression in malignant melanocytes in melanoma specimens. High GILT mRNA expression in melanoma specimens is associated with improved overall survival, before the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, the association of GILT in metastatic melanoma with survival in patients treated with ICI and the cell type expressing GILT associated with survival have not been determined. Using RNA sequencing datasets, high GILT mRNA expression in metastatic melanoma specimens was associated with improved progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with ICI. A clinical dataset of metastatic melanoma specimens was generated and annotated with clinical information. Positive GILT immunohistochemical staining in antigen presenting cells and melanoma cells was observed in 100% and 65% of metastatic melanoma specimens, respectively. In the subset of patients treated with ICI in the clinical dataset, high GILT protein expression within melanoma cells was associated with improved overall survival. The association of GILT mRNA and protein expression with survival was independent of cancer stage. These studies support that high GILT mRNA expression in bulk tumor samples and high GILT protein expression in melanoma cells is associated with improved survival in ICI-treated patients. These findings support further investigation of GILT as a biomarker to predict the response to ICI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1919 KiB  
Article
Long Term Results and Prognostic Biomarkers for Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy Used after BRAFi/MEKi Combination in Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma Patients
by Paweł Rogala, Anna M. Czarnecka, Bożena Cybulska-Stopa, Krzysztof Ostaszewski, Karolina Piejko, Marcin Ziętek, Robert Dziura, Ewa Rutkowska, Łukasz Galus, Natasza Kempa-Kamińska, Joanna Seredyńska, Wiesław Bal, Katarzyna Kozak, Anna Surus-Hyla, Tomasz Kubiatowski, Grażyna Kamińska-Winciorek, Rafał Suwiński, Jacek Mackiewicz and Piotr Rutkowski
Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2123; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092123 - 24 Apr 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3071
Abstract
(1) Background: BRAFi/MEKi are usually offered as a first line treatment for patients requiring rapid response; with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, large tumor burden, and with brain metastases. The efficacy of second line therapies after BRAFi/MEKI failure is now well defined. (2) [...] Read more.
(1) Background: BRAFi/MEKi are usually offered as a first line treatment for patients requiring rapid response; with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, large tumor burden, and with brain metastases. The efficacy of second line therapies after BRAFi/MEKI failure is now well defined. (2) Methods: Patients treated with first line target BRAFi/MEKi therapy (vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, dabrafenib plus trametinib or encorafenib plus binimetinib); and for the second line treatment immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) with at least one cycle of second line were analyzed for survival and prognostic biomarkers. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ORR between the treatment groups with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as median progression free-survival (PSF) and overall survival (OS) since the initiation of second line therapy; on nivolumab OS was 6.6 months, and on pembrolizumab 5.0 months. The greatest clinical benefit with second line immunotherapy was observed in patients with LDH ≤ ULN and <3 organ sites with metastasis at baseline. Longer OS was also noted in patients with time to PD  >6 months in first line (slow progression). (4) Conclusions: Second line anti-PD1 immunotherapy is effective in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients after BRAFi/MEKi therapy failure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 909 KiB  
Article
Immune-Related Thyroid Adverse Events Predict Response to PD-1 Blockade in Patients with Melanoma
by Anna Dawidowska, Paulina Jagodzinska-Mucha, Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk, Sylwia Jaczewska, Paweł Sobczuk, Monika Chelstowska, Maria Kowalska, Honorata Badziak-Sterczewska, Jan Poleszczuk, Piotr Rutkowski and Iwona Lugowska
Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051248 - 28 Feb 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2296
Abstract
Antibodies against programmed cell death protein-1 or its ligand (PD-(L)1) are a standard of care in melanoma; however, this treatment may cause immune-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy and [...] Read more.
Antibodies against programmed cell death protein-1 or its ligand (PD-(L)1) are a standard of care in melanoma; however, this treatment may cause immune-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy and analyze their influence on the overall survival rates in melanoma. We included 249 patients with metastatic melanoma treated in our institution between 2014 and 2021; the median age was 62 years (range: 17–90); 58% were males, and 37% of patients had the BRAF mutation. We included patients with a normal TSH at baseline and followed up with measurement of TSH levels during immunotherapy. In our group, 95 patients had a TSH outside the normal range: 63 not clinically significant and 32 with clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism. The 3-year overall survival rate was related to the irTAEs of clinical hypothyroidism, abnormal clinically not significant TSH, and euthyreosis at 56%, 43%, and 32%, respectively (p = 0.002). After adjusting the Cox model for potential confounding variables, clinically significant hypothyroidism was an independent prognostic factor with HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29–0.87). In conclusion, the patients who developed clinically significant hypothyroidism requiring replacement therapy with L-thyroxin were the group who benefitted most from anti-PD-1 treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 866 KiB  
Article
The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
by Paweł Sobczuk, Katarzyna Kozak, Sylwia Kopeć, Paweł Rogala, Tomasz Świtaj, Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk, Aleksandra Gos, Andrzej Tysarowski and Piotr Rutkowski
Cancers 2022, 14(3), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777 - 2 Feb 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2476
Abstract
Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naïve melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis [...] Read more.
Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naïve melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5387 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy for Borderline Resectable III B-D or IV Stage BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma
by Anna M. Czarnecka, Krzysztof Ostaszewski, Aneta Borkowska, Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Katarzyna Kozak, Tomasz Świtaj, Paweł Rogala, Iwona Kalinowska, Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk, Konrad Zaborowski, Paweł Teterycz, Andrzej Tysarowski, Donata Makuła and Piotr Rutkowski
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010110 - 27 Dec 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2944
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma is expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment as it is for sarcoma, breast, rectal, esophageal, or gastric cancers. Patients with locoregional recurrence after initial surgery [...] Read more.
Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma is expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment as it is for sarcoma, breast, rectal, esophageal, or gastric cancers. Patients with locoregional recurrence after initial surgery and those with advanced regional lymphatic metastases are at a high risk of relapse and melanoma-related death. There is an unmet clinical need to improve the outcomes for such patients. Patients with resectable bulky stage III or resectable stage IV histologically confirmed melanoma were enrolled and received standard-dose BRAFi/MEKi for at least 12 weeks before feasible resection of the pre-therapy target and then received at least for the next 40 weeks further BRAFi/MEKi. Of these patients, 37 were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, three were treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib, five with vemurafenib, and one with dabrafenib alone. All patients underwent surgery with 78% microscopically margin-negative resection (R0) resection. Ten patients achieved a complete pathological response. In patients with a major pathological response with no, or less than 10%, viable cells in the tumor, median disease free survival and progression free survival were significantly longer than in patients with a minor pathological response. No patient discontinued neoadjuvant BRAFi/MEKi due to toxicity. BRAFi/MEKi pre-treatment did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. Fourteen patients experienced disease recurrence or progression during post-operative treatment. We confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of melanoma. Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment may be considered as a surrogate biomarker of disease recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2790 KiB  
Article
BRAFV600E Mutant Allele Frequency (MAF) Influences Melanoma Clinicopathologic Characteristics
by Xavier Soria, Felip Vilardell, Óscar Maiques, Carla Barceló, Pol Sisó, Inés de la Rosa, Ana Velasco, Dolors Cuevas, Maria Santacana, Sònia Gatius, Xavier Matías-Guiu, Alberto Rodrigo, Anna Macià and Rosa M. Martí
Cancers 2021, 13(20), 5073; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205073 - 11 Oct 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2383
Abstract
Background: Cutaneous melanoma shows high variability regarding clinicopathological presentation, evolution and prognosis. Methods: Next generation sequencing was performed to analyze hotspot mutations in different areas of primary melanomas (MMp) and their paired metastases. Clinicopathological features were evaluated depending on the degree of variation [...] Read more.
Background: Cutaneous melanoma shows high variability regarding clinicopathological presentation, evolution and prognosis. Methods: Next generation sequencing was performed to analyze hotspot mutations in different areas of primary melanomas (MMp) and their paired metastases. Clinicopathological features were evaluated depending on the degree of variation of the BRAFV600E mutant allele frequency (MAF) in MMp. Results: In our cohort of 14 superficial spreading, 10 nodular melanomas and 52 metastases, 17/24 (71%) melanomas had a BRAFV600E mutation and 5/24 (21%) had a NRASQ61 mutation. We observed a high variation of BRAFV600E MAF (H-BRAFV600E) in 7/17 (41%) MMp. The H-BRAFV600E MMp were all located on the trunk, had lower Breslow and mitotic indexes and predominantly, a first nodal metastasis. Regions with spindled tumor cells (Spin) and high lymphocytic infiltrate (HInf) were more frequent in the H-BRAFV600E patients (4/7; 57%), whereas regions with epithelial tumor cells (Epit) and low lymphocytic infiltrate (LInf) were predominant (6/10; 60%) and exclusive in the low BRAFV600E MAF variation tumors (L-BRAFV600E). The H-BRAFV600E/Spin/HInf MMp patients had better prognostic features and nodal first metastasis. Conclusions: The H-BRAFV600E MMp were located on the trunk, had better prognostic characteristics, such as lower Breslow and mitotic indexes as well as high lymphocytic infiltrate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop