Prague German Circle(s): Stable Values in Turbulent Times?

A special issue of Humanities (ISSN 2076-0787).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 July 2024) | Viewed by 3909

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Liberal Arts, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5223, USA
Interests: language pedagogy from beginning levels to advanced content courses; literature of the 19th and 20th centuries, including Modern Austrian literature, Czech-German literature

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Renowned Max Brod scholar Margarita Pazi has argued that the historical and geographical constellation of Czech-German writers is unique and provided the context for some of the world’s greatest literature, including but not limited to Franz Kafka (Pazi, 1995). Do these Czech-German authors, centered – though not exclusively – in Prague make up a “circle” (Brod, 1966), a “school” (H.G. Adler, 2010 [1976]), “circles” with “nodes” of connection (Weinberg, 2017), or a number of different “epicenters” (Jungmayr, 2014)? Any attempt to answer this question brings up a whole host of others: Is there indeed something (heritage? humanism? fate?) that unites the writers of this group and evokes the term, “circle”? What definitional contours did Max Brod use in creating this constellation of German-speaking authors? Was H.G. Adler correct in his assessment that this was a one-time phenomenon never to be seen again? And if one dispenses with the singular term (i.e., circle) does that adjust the focus away from Kafka as the central figure?

This special issue will bring much needed attention in English to this group of Czech-German writers. With Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach as its inaugural author, Brod’s Prague Circle counted among its members some of the most sophisticated crafters of the German language. According to subsequent scholars of the Circle(s), many authors, such as Egon Erwin Kisch, Franz Werfel, Ernst Weiss, Paul Kornfeld, Oskar Baum, Ludwig Winder, Otto Pick, Willy Haas, Johannes Urzidil, Hermann Ungar, Rudolf Fuchs, F.C. Weiskopf, Hermann Grab, Friedrich Torberg, Paul Adler, Hanna Demetz, and Hans Klaus, were well-received critically in their own time but are still today not well-known, especially in the Anglophone world. Papers in English dealing with these authors are welcome as well as on the women authors who begin and end the existence of this unique constellation of authors: Ebner-Eschenbach and Lenka Reinerová.

We therefore want to bring together scholars not so much to debate the value of terminology (is it a circle or a school?) but to bring to light (forgotten or neglected) literary texts and their engagement with stable values, the dissolution of values (Broch, 1952), and/or the necessity of their rejuvenation (Schönwiese, 1959). Each paper should investigate the complexity of the work’s speaking intelligence in its context and bring to light what, if anything, these authors have to say to us today about the stability or instability of values in turbulent times. Submissions should address the literary qualities of the prose under consideration and suggest how the author(s) can speak to readers today in valuable and affirming ways, even if these authors invoke meaning through its absence.

Some (not exclusive) questions contributors may want to consider:

  • What is the role of modernist literature in a postmodern world?
  • Can an analysis of the work Czech-German women writers contribute something new to and expand the conversation of/about women in literature?
  • How might one carry on in Brod’s or Pazi’s spirit of a unifying moral imperative that makes these works identifiable to their time and place?
  • What light would a discussion of terminology [e.g., circle(s) vs. a school] shed on the evaluation and interpretation of literature of this time and place?
  • Can we identify epicenters among these writers that do not include Brod and Kafka? What about Hartmut Binder’s “lost generation” (1991) and authors not included by Brod in his Prager Kreis?
  • Can we say that Berlin & Vienna were in creative crisis at this time, while Prague was ascendent? Alternatively, what does an investigation of Prague talent in Berlin or Vienna reveal?
  • Is Czech-German literature as a phenomenon greater than the sum of its parts?
  • Is Brod’s concept of a “transcendent realism” as a hallmark of the “Prague Circle” accurate or limiting?
  • (How) is intertextuality characteristic of these writers in their various novels? How do themes recur and converge?
  • What is the role of Prague in the works of these authors in the postwar period?
  • Examination of the relationships of these authors to Czech authors/artists/musicians of the time.
  • Czech-German authors in their role as cultural mediators.

Please send abstracts of 300–500 words, along with a short bio of 150–200 words, by 15 January 2024 to Traci O’Brien at . Completed articles of 5000–7000 words should be submitted by 1 July 2024.

WORKS CITED:

  • Adler, H. G. (2010 [1976]). Die Dichtung der Prager Schule (2nd ed.). Arco Verlag.
  • Binder, H. (1991). Prager Profile: Vergessene Autoren im schatten Kafkas. Mann.
  • Broch, H. (1952). Die Schlafwandler: Eine Romantrilogie. Rhein-Verlag.
  • Brod, M. (1966). Der Prager Kreis. Kohlhammer.
  • Jungmayr, J. (2014). Der Prager Kreis um Max Brod. Tradition und Moderne: Versuch eines Überblicks. In J. D. Adler & G. Dane (Eds.), Literatur und Anthropologie H. G. Adler, Elias Canetti und Franz Baermann Steiner in London (pp. 260–308). Wallstein-Verlag.
  • Pazi, M. (1995). The Prague Circle. In D. G. Daviau (Ed.), Major figures of Austrian literature: The interwar years 1918-1938 (pp. 355–391). Ariadne Press.
  • Schönwiese, E. (1959). Probleme des Wertzerfalls und der Integration. Wort in der Zeit 5.12: 15-30.
  • Weinberg, M. (2017). Prager Kreise. In P. Becher, S. Höhne, J. Krappmann, & M. Weinberg (Eds.), Handbuch der deutschen Literatur Prags und der Böhmischen Länder (pp. 195–223). J.B. Metzler.

Prof. Dr. Traci S. O'Brien
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Humanities is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
Mind the Gap: On the Absence of Writing Women in German-Language Literature of the Czech Lands
by Veronika Jičínská and Anna-Dorothea Ludewig
Humanities 2024, 13(6), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/h13060154 - 7 Nov 2024
Viewed by 470
Abstract
The absence of female writing forms a particularly striking gap in the historiography of German-language literature in the Czech Lands during the decades around 1900. Women participated significantly in the literary scene of the period but were largely forgotten. Our article will discuss [...] Read more.
The absence of female writing forms a particularly striking gap in the historiography of German-language literature in the Czech Lands during the decades around 1900. Women participated significantly in the literary scene of the period but were largely forgotten. Our article will discuss the conditions and discourses that enabled women to be active in the public space but later led to their absence in literary history. Approaches are sought that make future inclusion possible again. The first step for (re-)establishing a female presence in this area is to reconstruct biographies with a focus on female-specific social realities at the time and on the interaction of cultural, social and historical factors. In the next step, attention is brought to the “minor” or “simple”, rather non-canonical literary genres that were often used by women authors at the fin de siècle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prague German Circle(s): Stable Values in Turbulent Times?)
11 pages, 260 KiB  
Article
Between Emptiness and Enslavement: The Role of Interpersonal Relationships in the Work of Ernst Weiß, Hermann Ungar, and Ludwig Winder
by Michal Smrkovsky
Humanities 2024, 13(6), 150; https://doi.org/10.3390/h13060150 - 1 Nov 2024
Viewed by 481
Abstract
This article explores the complex struggle for identity in the works of three prominent Moravia-born Prague German writers of the early twentieth century: Ernst Weiß, Hermann Ungar, and Ludwig Winder. It delves into the recurring motif of fear of intimacy and the paradoxical [...] Read more.
This article explores the complex struggle for identity in the works of three prominent Moravia-born Prague German writers of the early twentieth century: Ernst Weiß, Hermann Ungar, and Ludwig Winder. It delves into the recurring motif of fear of intimacy and the paradoxical actions of their characters, who often view affection as a threat to their autonomy. Drawing on the psychoanalytic theories of Ronald Fairbairn and Harry Guntrip, the study examines how these authors depict this schizoid dilemma—the wish for interpersonal relationships, contrasting with the fear that love will lead to the destruction of the self. By analyzing selected works, the article identifies various coping mechanisms employed by the characters, such as emotional detachment, withdrawal into fantasies, and the creation of safe but ultimately hollow relationships. Through a comparative analysis, the paper reveals how these literary figures navigate their need for interpersonal connections while grappling with the terror of their own desires. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prague German Circle(s): Stable Values in Turbulent Times?)
12 pages, 239 KiB  
Article
The Prague-Frankfurt Orient Express: Eschatology, New Humanism, and the Birth of Dialogical Thinking
by Baharak Beizaei
Humanities 2024, 13(5), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/h13050114 - 6 Sep 2024
Viewed by 766
Abstract
The Prague Circle, under the leadership of Max Brod (1884–1968), was a prominent literary group that flourished from 1900 to 1939. This era witnessed a struggle between emancipation and assimilation for German-speaking Jews within the Habsburg and German Empires. The Prague literati possessed [...] Read more.
The Prague Circle, under the leadership of Max Brod (1884–1968), was a prominent literary group that flourished from 1900 to 1939. This era witnessed a struggle between emancipation and assimilation for German-speaking Jews within the Habsburg and German Empires. The Prague literati possessed a unique capacity for Dialogfähigkeit, which played a crucial role in safeguarding them against aggressive nationalism. The Patmos Circle, led by Martin Buber (1878–1965) and Franz Rosenzweig (1886–1929), transformed this readiness for dialogue into dialogical thinking: a distinct capability and an action-plan to combat the prevailing forms of confessionalism and nationalism during that period. Taking the concept of Dialogfähigkeit as a crucial cornerstone of Prague and Patmos literary groups, this paper analyzes some of the key moments in its development. The aim of this paper is to highlight a certain cross-pollination of ideas between the Prague and Patmos groups without arguing for explicit vectors of influence between them. This article places the Patmos Circle in its proper context through an examination of their publication, the quarterly magazine Die Kreatur (1926–1930). By focusing on the concept of New Humanism and the end of history, this research will analyze two modernist masterpieces authored by members of the Patmos Circle: Karl Barth’s Römerbrief (1919) and Franz Rosenzweig’s Der Stern der Erlösung (1919). Through a study of the evolution of dialogical thinking within the Patmos Circle, I contend that the term “circle” is more appropriate than “school” to describe such associations, as it acknowledges the diverse and overlapping group interests that united its various members. What distinguishes the Patmos group from the literary-aesthetic circles in Prague is their commitment to eschatology within a critique of progress and their pursuit of a New Humanism based on the value of dialogue as a vital occurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prague German Circle(s): Stable Values in Turbulent Times?)
14 pages, 289 KiB  
Article
Humanist Anecdotes in Hard Times: F. C. Weiskopf and Lenka Reinerová
by Ernest Schonfield
Humanities 2024, 13(5), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/h13050113 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 599
Abstract
This article examines humanist anecdotes about the turbulent times of the mid-twentieth century by F. C. Weiskopf and Lenka Reinerová. It provides a comparative reading of Weiskopf’s Elend und Größe unserer Tage. Anekdoten 1933–1947 (1950) and Reinerová’s “Tragischer Irrtum und richtige Diagnose” (published [...] Read more.
This article examines humanist anecdotes about the turbulent times of the mid-twentieth century by F. C. Weiskopf and Lenka Reinerová. It provides a comparative reading of Weiskopf’s Elend und Größe unserer Tage. Anekdoten 1933–1947 (1950) and Reinerová’s “Tragischer Irrtum und richtige Diagnose” (published in Mandelduft, 1998). The anecdotal form of these texts harks back to the popular Enlightenment (Volksaufklärung) anecdotes of Heinrich von Kleist and Johann Peter Hebel, published in 1810–1811 during the Napoleonic Wars. The anecdote as a literary form is particularly well suited to the representation of wartime and political repression. While Weiskopf’s anecdotes explore cruelty and heroism under the Nazi dictatorship, Reinerová’s autobiographical text juxtaposes crisis points in her own life—her time as a political prisoner in France in 1939 and in Czechoslovakia in 1952–1953; her return to Prague as her family’s sole survivor; and her periodic cancer treatment from 1948 onwards. Reinerová describes how the kindness of ordinary people, and her own optimism and resilience, helped her through the worst times. Her lived experience gives her authority as a storyteller in Walter Benjamin’s sense. Both authors contrast human extremes—the good and the bad—yet both remain optimistic about the human capacity for good. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prague German Circle(s): Stable Values in Turbulent Times?)
16 pages, 321 KiB  
Article
The “Final Rays” of a Setting Sun: Lenka Reinerová and the Legacy of “Prague German Literature”
by Markéta Balcarová
Humanities 2024, 13(4), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/h13040105 - 14 Aug 2024
Viewed by 830
Abstract
Lenka Reinerová is considered a contemporary witness of both the 20th and 21st centuries and the last German writer in Prague. Indeed, she is the last known prose writer from Prague who wrote in German and boasts a long list of famous predecessors, [...] Read more.
Lenka Reinerová is considered a contemporary witness of both the 20th and 21st centuries and the last German writer in Prague. Indeed, she is the last known prose writer from Prague who wrote in German and boasts a long list of famous predecessors, such as Franz Kafka, Max Brod, E. E. Kisch and others. Interestingly, Reinerová did not only earn a place among the Prague German literature writers because of her mother tongue. In her memoirs, she also engages with literary and academic discourse on the German-language literature coming from Prague. The following article aims to describe this continuity in more detail. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prague German Circle(s): Stable Values in Turbulent Times?)
Back to TopTop