The Eighteenth-Century Novel and History

A special issue of Humanities (ISSN 2076-0787). This special issue belongs to the section "Literature in the Humanities".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2024) | Viewed by 1362

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Linguistics and Comparative Cultural Studies, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy
Interests: eighteenth-century studies; english literature

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

In Ian Watt’s influential account of the “rise of the novel”, this new type of fiction broke away from ancient models and traditions. Its focus on creating something “new” and its emphasis on portraying the empirically surrounding characters, narrators, and events led it to reject history as a repository of cultural and philosophical models, as well as of formal patterns. With a few exceptions, the new novels narrated events that were set in modern and contemporary times, with spatial, temporal, and psychological specifics considered crucial. 

Michael McKeon has demonstrated how long-standing categories of aesthetic representation and ethical discourse underwent a crisis in the long eighteenth century, leading to a skeptical approach to historical matters that was reflected in the new narrative forms. This skepticism was combined with a new antiquarian and philological interpretation of history as well as historical documents that opposed traditional historiography aiming to educate the ruling elites. 

Everett Zimmerman has shown how fiction was viewed by eighteenth-century critics as less reliable than (antiquarian) history because “it substituted a more stimulating though less accurate representation of reality”, so that “the important issue behind this eighteenth-century contest between history and fiction [was] not precisely that of truth (for fiction claims its kind of truth just as history claims its kind) but of verifiability and adequacy”. While history appeared to be a more reliable representation of facts and events, fiction was perceived as a more nuanced and adequate way of reproducing reality. 

However, there is also a counter-history of the novel. Margaret Anne Doody has argued that subterranean links exist between the eighteenth-century novel and ancient romance, mediated by Renaissance romance. Studies of secret histories and prose satire, as well as the interplay between fiction and didactic in addition to historical texts, have complicated the “rise of the novel” interpretation of eighteenth-century fiction. In the second half of the century, a fascination with a different kind of antiquity, the Middle Ages, led to an extravagant representation of the past in the Gothic novel. New historiographical paradigms introduced by the Scottish conjectural historians, as well as by David Hume and Edward Gibbon, underpinned a fiction with complex roots in a newly conceptualized past. Both antiquarian and rhetorical historiographies co-existed and interpenetrated in interesting ways, although the path towards a divergence between the two approaches was traced. Fiction based on history, at least in its more hortatory functions and versions, aligned itself with traditional historiography and, in turn, derived some of its rhetorical structures and tools. 

We invite contributions on the interplay between fiction and history, competing or parallel narrative traditions, the structuring use of historical references in fiction, the fictional/narrative approach to history writing, and the issue of the adherence to truth in both fiction and history in the English literature of the long eighteenth century.

Prof. Dr. Flavio Gregori
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Humanities is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 550 KiB  
Article
Between Sensibility and History: The Count de Rethel (1779) by Georgiana Spencer Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire
by Hélène Vidal
Humanities 2024, 13(4), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/h13040101 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 655
Abstract
The Count de Rethel: An Historical Novel (1779) can be ascribed to Georgiana Spencer Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire (1757–1806) as a translation of Anecdotes de la cour de Philippe-Auguste (1733) by Marguerite de Lussan. The action is set at the court of Philip II [...] Read more.
The Count de Rethel: An Historical Novel (1779) can be ascribed to Georgiana Spencer Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire (1757–1806) as a translation of Anecdotes de la cour de Philippe-Auguste (1733) by Marguerite de Lussan. The action is set at the court of Philip II of France, known as Philip Augustus, at the time of the war with King Henry II and the Crusade with Richard I, known as the Lionheart. This inspired revival of fictionalised medieval history heralding romanticism in the age of sensibility refashions the codes of chivalry according to the aesthetics of the second half of the eighteenth century. This essay focuses on the interplay between fiction and history, between the present of writing and the rewriting of history through Cavendish’s translational prism, featuring the Middle Ages as a golden age of heroism and the Count de Rethel as a paragon of ancient virtue set against contemporary men of fashion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Eighteenth-Century Novel and History)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop