Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
8.1
4.9
Journals
IJMS
Special Issues
Gender Specific Results in Musculo-Skeletal Research, from Bench to Bedside
ijms-logo
Submit to IJMS Review for IJMS Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Gender Specific Results in Musculo-Skeletal Research, from Bench to Bedside

A special issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Biology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2023) | Viewed by 5625

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Manuela Salerno

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Applied and Translational Research center (ATRc), IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Interests: cell biology; biotechnology; regenerative medicine; tissue engineering; women’s health
Dr. Francesca Taraballi

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave., Houston, TX 77030, USA
Interests: biomaterials; immune-engineering; regenerative medicine; orthobiologics; translational science
Prof. Dr. Giuseppe Filardo

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Applied and Translational Research center (ATRc), IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Interests: orthobiologics; musculoskeletal; osteoarthritis, cartilage; regenerative medicine

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Male and female musculoskeletal tissues differ in several physiological features, ranging from cell molecular pathways and response to sex hormones, to anatomical and biomechanical aspects. These sex-based differences could account for the higher risk of sustaining injuries or developing degenerative conditions experienced by women, even influencing the response to therapies, the risks of adverse reactions, and treatment outcomes over time.

Thus, the importance of having clear gender-specific data on both etiopathology and treatment was underlined by the 2016 NIH request for looking at sex as a biological variable. Yet, there is alarming evidence that female sex is under-represented, and that female data are not disaggregated in preclinical and clinical studies addressing even the most common pathologies, including orthopaedic disorders. The use of preclinical in vitro and in vivo models represents the foundation of treatment development, and results based on only male subjects present a great bias and could reflect on clinical trials with serious consequences for women’s health.

Gender equity and equality should foresee the same opportunities to both sexes according to their specific needs, including the availability of adequate health service and medical treatments. To do that, it is paramount to have data that specifically document etiopathogenetic mechanisms, epidemiological distributions, as well as treatment responses in men and women. This Special Issue aims to provide data from bench to bedside on sex- and gender-specific differences in musculoskeletal disorders, and to offer women appropriate treatments that are no longer based on male data. Since IJMS is a journal of molecular science, submissions with bio-molecular experiments will be prioritized. Due to the importance of the topic and the broader scope of this Special Issue, clinical submissions with biomolecular experiments are also encouraged.

Dr. Manuela Salerno
Dr. Francesca Taraballi
Prof. Dr. Giuseppe Filardo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Molecular Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. There is an Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal. For details about the APC please see here. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sex
  • gender
  • gender bias
  • women's health
  • epidemiological gender-focused data
  • musculoskeletal gender-focused research
  • preclinical models: in vitro and in vivo
  • clinical gender-focused results
  • regenerative therapies
  • sex- and gender-focused reviews
 

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 3193 KiB  
Article
Retrospective Analysis of Bone Substitute Material for Traumatic Long Bone Fractures: Sex-Specific Outcomes
by Jonas Pawelke, Vithusha Vinayahalingam, Christian Heiss, Thaqif El Khassawna and Gero Knapp
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14232; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814232 - 18 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 999
Abstract
Male patients often experience increased bone and muscle loss after traumatic fractures. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of male and female patients with large bone defects. A total of 345 trauma patients underwent surgery, with participants divided into two groups: [...] Read more.
Male patients often experience increased bone and muscle loss after traumatic fractures. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of male and female patients with large bone defects. A total of 345 trauma patients underwent surgery, with participants divided into two groups: one receiving bone substitute material (BSM) for augmented defects (n = 192) and the other without augmentation (empty defects = ED, n = 153). Outcome parameters were assessed among female (n = 184) and male (n = 161) patients. Descriptive statistics revealed no significant differences between male and female patients. Approximately one-half of the fractures resulted from high-energy trauma (n = 187). The BSM group experienced fewer complications (p = 0.004), including pseudarthrosis (BSM: n = 1, ED: n = 7; p = 0.02). Among female patients over 65, the incidence of pseudarthrosis was lower in the BSM group (p = 0.01), while younger females showed no significant differences (p = 0.4). Radiologically, we observed premature bone healing with subsequent harmonization. Post hoc power analysis demonstrated a power of 0.99. Augmenting bone defects, especially with bone substitute material, may reduce complications, including pseudarthrosis, in female patients. Additionally, this material accelerates bone healing. Further prospective studies are necessary for confirmation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender Specific Results in Musculo-Skeletal Research, from Bench to Bedside)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 8161 KiB  
Article
Gender-Specific Differences in Human Vertebral Bone Marrow Clot
by Francesca Salamanna, Deyanira Contartese, Veronica Borsari, Stefania Pagani, Maria Sartori, Matilde Tschon, Cristiana Griffoni, Gianluca Giavaresi, Giuseppe Tedesco, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Alessandro Gasbarrini and Milena Fini
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(14), 11856; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411856 - 24 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1392
Abstract
Recently, our group described the application of vertebral bone marrow (vBMA) clot as a cell therapy strategy for spinal fusion. Its beneficial effects were confirmed in aging-associated processes, but the influence of gender is unknown. In this study, we compared the biological properties [...] Read more.
Recently, our group described the application of vertebral bone marrow (vBMA) clot as a cell therapy strategy for spinal fusion. Its beneficial effects were confirmed in aging-associated processes, but the influence of gender is unknown. In this study, we compared the biological properties of vBMA clots and derived vertebral mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from female and male patients undergoing spinal fusion procedures and treated with vBMA clot. We analyzed the expression of growth factors (GFs) in vBMA clots and MSCs as well as morphology, viability, doubling time, markers expression, clonogenicity, differentiation ability, senescence factors, Klotho expression, and HOX and TALE gene profiles from female and male donors. Our findings indicate that vBMA clots and derived MSCs from males had higher expression of GFs and greater osteogenic and chondrogenic potential compared to female patients. Additionally, vBMA-clot-derived MSCs from female and male donors exhibited distinct levels of HOX and TALE gene expression. Specifically, HOXA1, HOXB8, HOXD9, HOXA11, and PBX1 genes were upregulated in MSCs derived from clotted vBMA from male donors. These results demonstrate that vBMA clots can be effectively used for spinal fusion procedures; however, gender-related differences should be taken into consideration when utilizing vBMA-clot-based studies to optimize the design and implementation of this cell therapy strategy in clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender Specific Results in Musculo-Skeletal Research, from Bench to Bedside)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 573 KiB  
Review
Reasons for the Sex Bias in Osteoarthritis Research: A Review of Preclinical Studies
by Madeline Franke, Chiara Mancino and Francesca Taraballi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(12), 10386; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210386 - 20 Jun 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2459
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of articular cartilage. During OA, all the elements that contribute to the joint undergo physiological and structural changes that impair the joint function and cause joint pain and stiffness. OA can arise naturally, [...] Read more.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of articular cartilage. During OA, all the elements that contribute to the joint undergo physiological and structural changes that impair the joint function and cause joint pain and stiffness. OA can arise naturally, with the aging population witnessing an increase in diagnoses of this pathology, but the root causes of OA have yet to be identified, and increasing interest is arising towards investigating biological sex as a risk factor. Clinical studies show increased prevalence and worse clinical outcomes for female patients, yet most clinical and preclinical studies have disproportionately focused on male subjects. This review provides a critical overview of preclinical practices in the context of OA, highlighting the underlying need for taking biological sex as both a risk factor and an important component affecting treatment outcome. A unique insight into the possible reasons for female underrepresentation in preclinical studies is offered, including factors such as lack of specific guidelines requiring the analysis of sex as a biological variable (SABV), research-associated costs and animal handling, and wrongful application of the reduction principle. Additionally, a thorough investigation of sex-related variables is provided, stressing how each of them could add valuable information for the understanding of OA pathophysiology, as well as sex-dependent treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender Specific Results in Musculo-Skeletal Research, from Bench to Bedside)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop