jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2020) | Viewed by 82639

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, UHN, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Interests: cancer rehabilitation; cancer survivorship; long-term effects of cancer; innovative care models; eHealth; implementation science
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Dept. of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Interests: exercise; rehabilitation; oncology; survivorship; physical function

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Due to improvements in early detection together with the development of increasingly effective treatments, mortality rates have dropped significantly over the past three decades for many of the most prevalent cancers. This has led to a dramatic rise in the number of cancer survivors worldwide. Cancer survivors have unique needs and face multiple physical, functional, and psychosocial challenges during and after cancer treatment, which requires the development of innovative models of care and interventions.

With this Special Issue, we hope to encourage submissions that provide new information on the needs of cancer survivors, address and focus on interventions and innovative models of survivorship care and cancer rehabilitation, and address issues related to implementation of these services.

Submissions are encouraged on the following topics:

  • Descriptive studies on survivors’ experiences and outcomes (particular interest in older cancer survivors; non-breast cancer populations);
  • Descriptive studies on late and long-term physical and psychosocial effects, (particular focus on long-term survivors > 5 years and biologic mechanisms and genetic factors related to adverse effects) as well as participation restrictions, functional wellbeing, and disability;
  • Models of survivorship care (particular focus on patterns and quality of survivorship care topics as care coordination, health care utilization, and survivorship care planning);
  • Cancer rehabilitation and prehabilitation interventions that reduce disability of cancer survivors across the lifespan;
  • Evidence-based practice and implementation science in cancer rehabilitation and survivorship programs.

Dr. Jennifer Jones
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cancer survivorship
  • cancer rehabilitation
  • adverse side effects
  • models of care
  • implementation science

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (20 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

11 pages, 499 KiB  
Article
Clinic Utilization and Characteristics of Patients Accessing a Prostate Cancer Supportive Care Program’s Sexual Rehabilitation Clinic
by Julie Wong, Luke Witherspoon, Eugenia Wu, Sara Sheikholeslami, Wen Liao, Wallace Yuen, Jenna Bentley, Christine Zarowski, Monita Sundar, Stacy Elliott, Celestia S. Higano and Ryan Flannigan
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3363; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103363 - 20 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4176
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) treatment leads to impairment of sexual function. The Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program’s Sexual Rehabilitation clinic (SRC) assists patients and their partners with sexual recovery using a biopsychosocial approach to rehabilitation. This study characterizes patients seen in the SRC [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PC) treatment leads to impairment of sexual function. The Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program’s Sexual Rehabilitation clinic (SRC) assists patients and their partners with sexual recovery using a biopsychosocial approach to rehabilitation. This study characterizes patients seen in the SRC between July 2013–1 July 2019. Data was retrospectively abstracted from clinic records. In total, 965 patients were seen over 3391 appointments during the study period. Median age (standard deviation (SD)) was 66 years (SD = 7.1), 82.0% were partnered, yet 81.7% attended appointments alone. 88.0% were treated with surgery, 5.1% with brachytherapy, 3.7% with external beam radiation (EBRT), 1.8% with combined brachytherapy and EBRT, and 1.4% with androgen deprivation therapy. In total, 708 patients (73.4%) attended ≥1 follow-up appointment. Median time (SD) between end of prostate cancer treatment to first SRC appointment was 270 days (range 0–7766). The mean (SD) self-reported overall sexual satisfaction (extracted from International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5)) significantly increased both with erectile aids (1.69 (SD = 1.52) to 2.26 (SD = 1.66), p < 0.001, n = 148) and without erectile aids (1.71 (SD = 1.44) to 2.35 (SD = 1.57), p < 0.001, n = 235). This study provides guidance for further investigation to refine treatment, wait-times, support, and/or resource offerings in this type of program. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5502 KiB  
Article
Acceptability and Usefulness of a Dyadic, Tailored, Web-Based, Psychosocial and Physical Activity Self-Management Program (TEMPO): A Qualitative Study
by Sylvie D. Lambert, Lindsay Rosamond Duncan, Janet Ellis, Jamie Lynn Schaffler, Ekaterina Loban, John Wellesley Robinson, Nicole Culos-Reed, Andrew Matthew, Karissa Clayberg, Daniel Santa Mina, Lauren Goldberg, Phil Pollock, Simon Tanguay, Wassim Kassouf, Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri, Stuart Peacock and Anne Katz
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3284; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103284 - 13 Oct 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4258
Abstract
Caregivers of men with prostate cancer report high burden, and there is a need to develop cost-effective programs to support them in their roles. This study reports on the acceptability of a dyadic, Tailored, wEb-based, psychosocial and physical activity (PA) [...] Read more.
Caregivers of men with prostate cancer report high burden, and there is a need to develop cost-effective programs to support them in their roles. This study reports on the acceptability of a dyadic, Tailored, wEb-based, psychosocial and physical activity (PA) self-Management PrOgram called TEMPO. TEMPO was accessed by a convenience sample of 19 men with prostate cancer and their caregivers (n = 18), as well as six health care professionals (HCPs). User feedback was gathered via semi-structured qualitative interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Most dyads were satisfied with TEMPO, particularly with the dyadic feature of TEMPO, the focus on goal setting to integrate self-management, and the extensive health library. The patients and caregivers motivated each other as they worked through TEMPO. Most goals to achieve during TEMPO pertained to increasing PA, followed by learning physical symptom management. One unanticipated benefit of TEMPO for the dyads was improved communication. HCPs agreed that TEMPO was a novel approach to online cancer self-management and they echoed the benefits reported by dyads. Key suggestions for improving TEMPO were to reduce repetition, tailor content, add more exercise ideas, and have more printing options. This study provides a strong foundation on which to plan a larger trial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1338 KiB  
Article
Physical Activity in People with Multiple Myeloma: Associated Factors and Exercise Program Preferences
by Jennifer L. Nicol, Carmel Woodrow, Nicola W. Burton, Peter Mollee, Andrew J. Nicol, Michelle M. Hill and Tina L. Skinner
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3277; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103277 - 13 Oct 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2893
Abstract
People with multiple myeloma (MM) often experience disease symptoms and treatment toxicities that can be alleviated through physical activity (PA). However, the majority of people with MM are insufficiently active. This study explored PA among people with MM, including differences by treatment stage, [...] Read more.
People with multiple myeloma (MM) often experience disease symptoms and treatment toxicities that can be alleviated through physical activity (PA). However, the majority of people with MM are insufficiently active. This study explored PA among people with MM, including differences by treatment stage, symptoms and demographics, and programming preferences. Overall, 126 people with MM (77% response rate) completed the survey. Pre-diagnosis, 25.4% were sufficiently active, with 12.0% remaining active after treatment. Respondents who were physically active pre-diagnosis were 46.7 times (95% confidence intervals CI: 2.03, 1072.1) more likely to meet PA guidelines following an MM diagnosis compared to people not meeting guidelines pre-diagnosis. Experiencing MM symptoms and receiving PA advice from healthcare professionals were not associated with meeting PA guidelines. People with MM were interested in exercise programs (55%) that are low-cost (77%), offered at flexible times (74%), and at locations close to home (69%), both during active treatment and remission (57%), and supervised by an exercise oncology specialist (48%). People with MM, particularly those insufficiently active prior to diagnosis, should be offered convenient, low-cost exercise programs supervised by an exercise oncology specialist to increase PA participation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 221 KiB  
Article
Prostate Cancer Survivors’ and Caregivers’ Experiences Using Behavior Change Techniques during a Web-Based Self-Management and Physical Activity Program: A Qualitative Study
by Laura Hallward, Keryn Chemtob, Sylvie D. Lambert and Lindsay R. Duncan
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3244; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103244 - 11 Oct 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2943
Abstract
Both men with prostate cancer and their caregivers report experiencing a number of challenges and health consequences, and require programs to help support the cancer patient–caregiver dyad. A tailored, web-based, psychosocial and physical activity self-management program (TEMPO), which implements behavior change techniques to [...] Read more.
Both men with prostate cancer and their caregivers report experiencing a number of challenges and health consequences, and require programs to help support the cancer patient–caregiver dyad. A tailored, web-based, psychosocial and physical activity self-management program (TEMPO), which implements behavior change techniques to help facilitate behavior change for the dyads was created and its acceptability was tested in a qualitative study. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to explore the dyads’ experiences using behavior change techniques to change behavior and address current needs and challenges while enrolled in TEMPO. Multiple semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 prostate cancer-caregiver dyads over the course of the program, resulting in 46 transcripts that were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. Results revealed four main themes: (1) learning new behavior change techniques, (2) engaging with behavior change techniques learned in the past, (3) resisting full engagement with behavior change techniques, and (4) experiencing positive outcomes from using behavior change techniques. The dyads’ discussions of encountering behavior change techniques provided unique insight into the process of learning and implementing behavior change techniques through a web-based self-management program, and the positive outcomes that resulted from behavior changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
16 pages, 844 KiB  
Article
Anxiety, Depression, and Colorectal Cancer Survival: Results from Two Prospective Cohorts
by Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald, Shelley S. Tworoger, Xuehong Zhang, Edward L. Giovannucci, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt and Laura D. Kubzansky
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3174; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103174 - 30 Sep 2020
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 3865
Abstract
Given the unalterable nature of most risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) survival (e.g., disease stage), identifying modifiable determinants is critical. We investigated whether anxiety and depression were related to CRC survival using data from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professional [...] Read more.
Given the unalterable nature of most risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) survival (e.g., disease stage), identifying modifiable determinants is critical. We investigated whether anxiety and depression were related to CRC survival using data from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professional Follow-up Study (HPFS). Participants who received a CRC diagnosis and provided information about anxiety (nNHS = 335; nHPFS = 232) and depression (nNHS = 893; nHPFS = 272) within 4 years of diagnosis were included. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall mortality, while controlling for covariates (sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, and lifestyle factors). Pooled risk estimates were derived from fixed effects meta-analyses of the cohorts. Among 1732 CRC patients, 814 deaths occurred during the 28-year follow-up. Each 1 standard deviation increase in anxiety or depression symptoms was associated with a similar 16% higher mortality risk (anxiety: 95% CI = 1.05–1.29; depression: 95% CI = 1.07–1.26). Comparable results were observed across all sensitivity analyses (introducing a 1-year lag, restricting to CRC-related mortality, considering potential behavioral pathways) and stratified models (cancer stage, sex). Our findings suggest greater anxiety and depression symptoms can not only impede adherence to healthy habits and reduce quality of life in cancer patients but could also be a marker for accelerated CRC progression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 643 KiB  
Article
CaRE @ Home: Pilot Study of an Online Multidimensional Cancer Rehabilitation and Exercise Program for Cancer Survivors
by Anne Marie MacDonald, Aleksandra Chafranskaia, Christian J. Lopez, Manjula Maganti, Lori J. Bernstein, Eugene Chang, David Michael Langelier, Maya Obadia, Beth Edwards, Paul Oh, Jacqueline L. Bender, Shabbir MH Alibhai and Jennifer M. Jones
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3092; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103092 - 25 Sep 2020
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 4968
Abstract
Background: Although facility-based cancer rehabilitation and exercise programs exist, patients are often unable to attend due to distance, cost, and other competing obligations. There is a need for scalable remote interventions that can reach and serve a larger population. Methods: We conducted a [...] Read more.
Background: Although facility-based cancer rehabilitation and exercise programs exist, patients are often unable to attend due to distance, cost, and other competing obligations. There is a need for scalable remote interventions that can reach and serve a larger population. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods pilot study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact of CaRE@Home: an 8-week online multidimensional cancer rehabilitation and exercise program. Feasibility and acceptability data were captured by attendance and adherence metrics and through qualitative interviews. Preliminary estimates of the effects of CaRE@Home on patient-reported and physically measured outcomes were calculated. Results: A total of n = 35 participated in the study. Recruitment (64%), retention (83%), and adherence (80%) rates, along with qualitative findings, support the feasibility of the CaRE@Home intervention. Acceptability was also high, and participants provided useful feedback for program improvements. Disability (WHODAS 2.0) scores significantly decreased from baseline (T1) to immediately post-intervention (T2) and three months post-intervention (T3) (p = 0.03 and p = 0.008). Physical activity (GSLTPAQ) levels significantly increased for both Total LSI (p = 0.007 and p = 0.0002) and moderate to strenuous LSI (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002) from baseline to T2 and T3. Work productivity (iPCQ) increased from T1 to T3 (p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in six minute walk distance from baseline to T2 and T3 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.010) and in grip strength from baseline to T2 and T3 (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). Conclusions: Results indicate that the CaRE@Home program is a feasible and acceptable cancer rehabilitation program that may help cancer survivors regain functional ability and decrease disability. In order to confirm these findings, a controlled trial is required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 237 KiB  
Article
Sharing Cancer Survivorship Care between Oncology and Primary Care Providers: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Professionals’ Experiences
by Karolina Lisy, Jennifer Kent, Jodi Dumbrell, Helana Kelly, Amanda Piper and Michael Jefford
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2991; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092991 - 16 Sep 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3510
Abstract
Survivorship care that is shared between oncology and primary care providers may be a suitable model to effectively and efficiently care for the growing survivor population, however recommendations supporting implementation are lacking. This qualitative study aimed to explore health care professionals’ (HCPs) perceived [...] Read more.
Survivorship care that is shared between oncology and primary care providers may be a suitable model to effectively and efficiently care for the growing survivor population, however recommendations supporting implementation are lacking. This qualitative study aimed to explore health care professionals’ (HCPs) perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation, delivery and sustainability of shared survivorship care. Data were collected via semi-structured focus groups and analysed by inductive thematic analysis. Results identified four overarching themes: (1) considerations for HCPs; (2) considerations regarding patients; (3) considerations for planning and process; and (4) policy implications. For HCPs, subthemes included general practitioner (GP, primary care physician) knowledge and need for further training, having clear protocols for follow-up, and direct communication channels between providers. Patient considerations included identifying patients suitable for shared care, discussing shared care with patients early in their cancer journey, and patients’ relationships with their GPs. Regarding process, subthemes included rapid referral pathways back to hospital, care coordination, and ongoing data collection to inform refinement of a dynamic model. Finally, policy implications included development of policy to support a consistent shared care model, and reliable and sustainable funding mechanisms. Based on study findings, a set of recommendations for practice and policy were developed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
16 pages, 1120 KiB  
Article
Feasibility and Acceptability of Fear-Less: A Stepped-Care Program to Manage Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People with Metastatic Melanoma
by Fiona A Lynch, Lynda Katona, Michael Jefford, Allan Ben Smith, Joanne Shaw, Haryana M Dhillon, Steve Ellen, Jo Phipps-Nelson, Julia Lai-Kwon, Donna Milne, Lahiru Russell, Victoria Dax, Justine Diggens, Holly Kent, Alison Button-Sloan, Jane Elliott, Mark Shackleton, Hayley Burridge and Maria Ftanou
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2969; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092969 - 14 Sep 2020
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 5472
Abstract
Immunotherapies and targeted therapies have revolutionised treatment of metastatic melanoma and improved survival rates. However, survivors treated with novel therapies are vulnerable to high levels of fear of cancer recurrence or progression (FCR). Existing FCR interventions have rarely been trialled in people with [...] Read more.
Immunotherapies and targeted therapies have revolutionised treatment of metastatic melanoma and improved survival rates. However, survivors treated with novel therapies are vulnerable to high levels of fear of cancer recurrence or progression (FCR). Existing FCR interventions have rarely been trialled in people with advanced cancer. The current study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of Fear-Less: a stepped-care model to treat FCR in people with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Sixty-one outpatients with metastatic melanoma were screened using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF) and Fear of Progression Questionnaire Short Form (FoP-Q-SF). Survivors with subthreshold FCR were stratified to a self-management intervention while those with clinical levels of FCR were provided with an individual therapy, Conquer Fear. Survivor experience surveys and rescreening were administered post-intervention completion. Results indicated that Fear-Less was an acceptable and feasible FCR intervention. Results provided preliminary support for the potential impact of Fear-Less in reducing FCR. Fear-Less is a promising first step in providing an acceptable and feasible stepped-care model to treat FCR in survivors with metastatic disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 223 KiB  
Article
Patient and Medical Oncologists’ Perspectives on Prescribed Lifestyle Intervention—Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer and Providers
by Lynda G. Balneaves, Tracy L. O. Truant, Cheri Van Patten, Amy A. Kirkham, Erin Waters and Kristin L. Campbell
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2815; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092815 - 31 Aug 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2948
Abstract
This study explored the perspectives and experiences of breast cancer patients and medical oncologists with regards to participation in a lifestyle intervention at a tertiary cancer treatment center. A thematic approach was used to understand the context within which a lifestyle intervention was [...] Read more.
This study explored the perspectives and experiences of breast cancer patients and medical oncologists with regards to participation in a lifestyle intervention at a tertiary cancer treatment center. A thematic approach was used to understand the context within which a lifestyle intervention was recommended and experienced, to inform future lifestyle programming and promote uptake. Twelve women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and eight medical oncologists completed interviews. Findings suggest receiving a prescription for a lifestyle intervention from a trusted health professional was influential to women with breast cancer. The intervention offered physical, psychological, emotional, social, and informational benefits to the women and oncologists perceived both physiological and relational benefit to prescribing the intervention. Challenges focused on program access and tailored interventions. Lifestyle prescriptions are perceived by women with breast cancer to have numerous benefits and may promote lifestyle interventions and build rapport between oncologists and women. Oncology healthcare professionals play a pivotal role in motivating women’s participation in lifestyle interventions during breast cancer treatment. Maintenance programs that transition patients into community settings and provide on-going information and follow-up are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
13 pages, 1908 KiB  
Article
Survivorship in Colorectal Cancer: A Cohort Study of the Patterns and Documented Content of Follow-Up Visits
by Victoria Garwood, Karolina Lisy and Michael Jefford
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2725; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092725 - 24 Aug 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2568
Abstract
Survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC) may experience a range of physical, psychosocial, and practical challenges as a consequence of their diagnosis. We assessed the patterns and documented content of follow-up visits within the first three years following treatment, in comparison to survivorship care [...] Read more.
Survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC) may experience a range of physical, psychosocial, and practical challenges as a consequence of their diagnosis. We assessed the patterns and documented content of follow-up visits within the first three years following treatment, in comparison to survivorship care guidelines. Survivors with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative resection at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre from July 2015 to January 2018 were followed for up to 1080 days. Patterns of follow-up were calculated by recording the date and specialty of each visit; documented content was assessed using a study-specific audit tool for the first year (360 days) of follow-up. Forty-eight survivors comprised the study population, 34 of whom (71%) attended the recommended two to four follow-up visits in their first year. Visit notes documented new symptoms (96%), physical changes (85%), physical examination (63%), and investigations (56%–90%); none had documented discussions of screening for other primary cancers, or regular health checks and/or screening. Each survivor had at least one outpatient letter that was sent to their primary care physician, but responsibilities were not adequately defined (31%). Although survivors had regular follow-up in their first year, documentation did not consistently address aspects of wider survivorship care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1118 KiB  
Article
Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
by Hannah Ray, Anna Beaumont, Jenelle Loeliger, Alicia Martin, Celia Marston, Karla Gough, Shilpa Bordia, Maria Ftanou and Nicole Kiss
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2431; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431 - 30 Jul 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3561
Abstract
This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation [...] Read more.
This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity and appropriateness) were evaluated using nine patient interviews, and operational data and medical records of 185 patients referred between August 2017 and December 2018. Adoption, including intention to try and uptake, were acceptable: 88% of referred patients agreed to screening and 71% of eligible patients agreed to clinic participation. Fidelity was mixed, secondary to inpatient admissions and disease progression interrupting patient participation. Clinician compliance with outcome assessment was variable at program commencement (dietetic, 95%; physiotherapy, 91%; occupational therapy, 33%; quality of life, 23%) and low at program completion (dietetic, 32%; physiotherapy, 13%; occupational therapy, 10%; quality of life, 11%) mainly due to non-attendance. Patient interviews revealed high satisfaction and perceived appropriateness. Adoption of the optimisation clinic was acceptable. Interview responses suggest patients feel the clinic is both acceptable and appropriate. This indicates a multidisciplinary model is an important aspect of comprehensive, timely and effective care. However, fidelity was low, secondary to the complexities of the patient cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1596 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Prevalence of Sensory Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy for 5 Years after Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
by Marie Selvy, Bruno Pereira, Nicolas Kerckhove, Coralie Gonneau, Gabrielle Feydel, Caroline Pétorin, Agnès Vimal-Baguet, Sergey Melnikov, Sharif Kullab, Mohamed Hebbar, Olivier Bouché, Florian Slimano, Vincent Bourgeois, Valérie Lebrun-Ly, Frédéric Thuillier, Thibault Mazard, David Tavan, Kheir Eddine Benmammar, Brigitte Monange, Mohamed Ramdani, Denis Péré-Vergé, Floriane Huet-Penz, Ahmed Bedjaoui, Florent Genty, Cécile Leyronnas, Jérôme Busserolles, Sophie Trevis, Vincent Pinon, Denis Pezet and David Balayssacadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2400; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082400 - 27 Jul 2020
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 5017
Abstract
(1) Background: Oxaliplatin is among the most neurotoxic anticancer drugs. Little data are available on the long-term prevalence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), even though the third largest population of cancer survivors is made up of survivors of colorectal cancer. (2) [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Oxaliplatin is among the most neurotoxic anticancer drugs. Little data are available on the long-term prevalence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), even though the third largest population of cancer survivors is made up of survivors of colorectal cancer. (2) Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in 16 French centers to assess the prevalence of CIPN, as well as its consequences (neuropathic pain, anxiety, depression, and quality of life) in cancer survivors during the 5 years after the end of adjuvant oxaliplatin chemotherapy. (3) Results: Out of 406 patients, the prevalence of CIPN was 31.3% (95% confidence interval: 26.8–36.0). Little improvement in CIPN was found over the 5 years, and 36.5% of patients with CIPN also had neuropathic pain. CIPN was associated with anxiety, depression, and deterioration of quality of life. None of the patients with CIPN were treated with duloxetine (recommendation from American Society of Clinical Oncology), and only 3.2%, 1.6%, and 1.6% were treated with pregabalin, gabapentin, and amitriptyline, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Five years after the end of chemotherapy, a quarter of patients suffered from CIPN. The present study showed marked psychological distress and uncovered a failure in management in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1805 KiB  
Article
Exercise before, during, and after Hospitalization for Allogeneic Hematological Stem Cell Transplant: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
by Daniel Santa Mina, Lianne B. Dolan, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Darren Au, Encarna Camacho Pérez, Alyssa Franzese, Shabbir M. H. Alibhai, Jennifer M. Jones and Eugene Chang
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(6), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061854 - 14 Jun 2020
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 5377
Abstract
People with cancer who undergo allogeneic hematological stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) experience significant deconditioning that can compromise quality of life. Exercise has shown to be beneficial before or after allo-HSCT; however, little is known about exercise therapy delivered across the continuum of care. [...] Read more.
People with cancer who undergo allogeneic hematological stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) experience significant deconditioning that can compromise quality of life. Exercise has shown to be beneficial before or after allo-HSCT; however, little is known about exercise therapy delivered across the continuum of care. We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial of exercise delivered prior to admission, during the inpatient stay, and after discharge versus control in people with planned allo-HSCT. Feasibility was assessed via recruitment and retention rates, the incidence of adverse events, and adherence to the exercise prescription. Estimates of efficacy were measured at baseline, one week prior to hospital admission, and 100 days and one year after transplant. The recruitment and retention rates were 20% and 33%, respectively. One serious adverse event occurred during the baseline six-minute walk test that precluded participation in the study and no adverse events were associated with the intervention. From baseline to pre-transplant, the intervention group improved six-minute walk test distances by 45 m (95% CI: −18.0 to 108.7)—a finding that warrants further investigation with an adequately powered trial. Our study contributes important feasibility considerations and pilot data for future exercise intervention research in allo-HSCT recipients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 292 KiB  
Article
Increased Acid-Producing Diet and Past Smoking Intensity Are Associated with Worse Prognoses among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study
by Tianying Wu, Fang-Chi Hsu and John P. Pierce
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(6), 1817; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061817 - 11 Jun 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4374
Abstract
Current dietary guidelines do not consider cancer survivors’ and past smokers’ low capacity to regulate their acid–base balance. People with a low capacity to regulate their acid–base balance are more susceptible to acid-producing diets. We studied a cohort of 2950 early stage breast [...] Read more.
Current dietary guidelines do not consider cancer survivors’ and past smokers’ low capacity to regulate their acid–base balance. People with a low capacity to regulate their acid–base balance are more susceptible to acid-producing diets. We studied a cohort of 2950 early stage breast cancer survivors who provided dietary information at baseline and during follow-up. We assessed the intakes of acid-producing diets via two commonly used dietary acid load scores: potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP). We assessed past smoking intensity by pack-years of smoking. After an average of 7.3 years of follow-up, there were 295 total deaths, 249 breast cancer-specific deaths, and 490 cases of recurrent breast cancer. Increased intakes of dietary acid load and pack-years of smoking were each independently and jointly associated with increased total mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality; tests for trends and overall associations were statistically significant for NEAP and marginally significant for PRAL. Compared to women in the lowest tertile of NEAP and pack-year of smoking = 0, women in the highest tertile of NEAP and pack-years of smoking >15 had the greatest increased risk of total mortality (HR = 3.23, 95%CI 1.99–5.26). Further, dietary acid scores were associated with increased breast cancer recurrence among women with pack-years of smoking >0 but not in those with pack-years of smoking = 0 (p values for interactions <0.05). Our study provides valuable evidence for adding dietary acid load scores to dietary guidelines for breast cancer survivors and developing specific guidelines for past smokers among these survivors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
16 pages, 1467 KiB  
Article
Electromyographic Analysis of Shoulder Neuromuscular Activity in Women Following Breast Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study
by Virginia Prieto-Gómez, Beatriz Navarro-Brazález, Óscar Sánchez-Méndez, Pedro de-la-Villa, Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez and María Torres-Lacomba
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(6), 1804; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061804 - 10 Jun 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2929
Abstract
Certain secondary effects derived from medical treatment in breast cancer can favor the development of alterations in shoulder biomechanics. To the best of our knowledge, persistent peripheral pain as a key factor for the development of neuromuscular activity impairments has not been analyzed. [...] Read more.
Certain secondary effects derived from medical treatment in breast cancer can favor the development of alterations in shoulder biomechanics. To the best of our knowledge, persistent peripheral pain as a key factor for the development of neuromuscular activity impairments has not been analyzed. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. A total of 90 women were included and allocated to three groups: (i) 30 women with persistent peripheral pain after breast cancer treatment, (ii) 30 women without pain after breast cancer treatment, and (iii) 30 healthy women. Surface electromyography was employed to measure the onset and amplitude of the muscle activity of three shoulder movements. Statistically significant differences were found in the neuromuscular activity for all the muscles and shoulder movements among women with persistent pain versus healthy women (i.e., amplitude muscle activity variable p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also observed in the neuromuscular activity for certain muscles in shoulder movements among women with persistent pain versus women without pain, as well as between women without pain versus healthy women. Therefore, following breast cancer treatment, women showed alterations in their shoulder neuromuscular activity, which were more significant if persistent pain existed. These findings may contribute to developing a selective therapeutic exercise program that optimizes the shoulder neuromuscular activity in women after breast cancer treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 244 KiB  
Article
The Needs and Experiences of Post-Treatment Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
by Jennifer M Jones, Margaret Fitch, Jared Bongard, Manjula Maganti, Abha Gupta, Norma D’Agostino and Chana Korenblum
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(5), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051444 - 13 May 2020
Cited by 67 | Viewed by 7321
Abstract
(1) Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who have been diagnosed with and treated for cancer have unique healthcare needs, but more research is needed to inform developmentally targeted cancer care for this population. The purpose of the current analyses was to describe [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who have been diagnosed with and treated for cancer have unique healthcare needs, but more research is needed to inform developmentally targeted cancer care for this population. The purpose of the current analyses was to describe the physical and psychosocial concerns and experiences of AYA cancer survivors during the post-treatment phase. (2) Methods: A national survey was conducted by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer to evaluate the experiences and unmet needs of cancer survivors (≥18 years) within the first 5 years following cancer treatment. The current analyses were conducted on the AYA survivor population (18–34 years). (3) Results: A total of 575 surveys were completed by AYAs. Of these, 61% were female, 51% were married/partnered, and 52% were 1–3 years post treatment. Approximately three-quarters report their physical or emotional health as good/very good. Overall, 88% reported at least one physical concern [mean of 3.98+2.11 physical concerns (range 0–9)], 90% reported at least one emotional concern [mean of 3.77+1.75 emotional concern (range 0–6)], and 79% reported at least one practical challenge [mean of 2.39+1.28 practical concerns (range 0–5)]. The most common concerns were anxiety/worry about cancer returning (83%), fatigue/tiredness (78%), and depression/loss of interest in daily activities (66%). On average, 43% of those reporting a concern sought help. Common reasons for not seeking help included not wanting to ask, being told that it was normal to feel the way they did, or embarrassment. Of those who did seek help, 37% encountered difficulty obtaining assistance. (4) Conclusions: These results suggest that post-treatment AYA cancer survivors have a high rate and number of physical, psychosocial, and practical concerns and are often not seeking or receiving help to address these. Proactive approaches to characterizing and eliminating barriers to obtaining appropriate care are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
14 pages, 2623 KiB  
Article
Feasibility, Safety and Effects of a One-Week, Ski-Based Exercise Intervention in Brain Tumor Patients and Their Relatives: A Pilot Study
by Fabian M. Troschel, Christian Ramroth, Lars Lemcke, Jens Clasing, Amelie S. Troschel, Martin Dugas, Walter Stummer, Rainer Wiewrodt, Ralf Brandt and Dorothee Wiewrodt
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(4), 1006; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041006 - 2 Apr 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3128
Abstract
A brain tumor diagnosis poses a significant psychological burden and it severely impacts quality of life (QOL), both in patients and relatives. However, comprehensive strategies addressing QOL in this setting remain rare. Here, we aim to share our findings of a one-week ski [...] Read more.
A brain tumor diagnosis poses a significant psychological burden and it severely impacts quality of life (QOL), both in patients and relatives. However, comprehensive strategies addressing QOL in this setting remain rare. Here, we aim to share our findings of a one-week ski exercise intervention, with emphasis on feasibility, safety, QOL, and physical exercise. The intervention consisted of week-long daily ski sessions with professional ski guides as well as dedicated physicians present. The participants were handed questionnaires, including distress and QOL items before, during, and after the intervention. Using fitness watches, exercise intensity was also tracked at these timepoints. During the intervention, patients were checked for adverse events daily. Fifteen participants, nine patients after multidisciplinary treatment, and six relatives were included in the study. Additionally, 13 children participated in the exercise, but not in the study. All of the participants completed the entire program. No severe adverse events were documented during daily checks. There was a strong increase in quantified activity and QOL with a corresponding decrease in distress during the intervention, and, partly, afterwards. This prospective brain tumor rehabilitation study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of challenging ski exercise in brain tumor patients. The findings also underline the exercise-mediated QOL benefits, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive brain tumor rehabilitation programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 584 KiB  
Article
Effects of a Multicomponent Exercise Program in Older Adults with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer during Adjuvant/Palliative Treatment: An Intervention Study
by Ilem D. Rosero, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Nicolas Martínez-Velilla, Bernardo Abel Cedeño-Veloz, Idoia Morilla and Mikel Izquierdo
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(3), 862; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030862 - 21 Mar 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5726
Abstract
Clinical intervention studies support the efficacy and safety of exercise programs as a treatment modality for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during adjuvant/palliative treatment, but the effectiveness of real-world oncogeriatric services is yet to be established. We aimed to examine the effects of a [...] Read more.
Clinical intervention studies support the efficacy and safety of exercise programs as a treatment modality for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during adjuvant/palliative treatment, but the effectiveness of real-world oncogeriatric services is yet to be established. We aimed to examine the effects of a 10-week structured and individualized multicomponent exercise program on physical/cognitive functioning and mental wellness in elderly patients with NSCLC under adjuvant therapy or palliative treatment. A non-randomized, opportunistic control, longitudinal-design trial was conducted on 26 patients with NSCLC stage I–IV. Of 34 eligible participants, 21 were allocated into two groups: (i) control group (n = 7) received usual medical care; and (ii) intervention group (n =19) received multicomponent program sessions, including endurance, strength, balance, coordination and stretching exercises. Tests included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 5-m habitual Gait Velocity Test (GVT), Timed Up & Go Test (TUG), 6-Min Walk Test (6MWT), independence of activities in daily living (IADL), muscular performance, cognitive function, and quality of life, which were measured at baseline and after 10 weeks of the program. Results revealed a significant group×time interaction for SPPB (p = 0.004), 5-m GVT (p = 0.036), TUG (p = 0.007), and muscular performance (chest and leg power; p < 0.001). Similarly, significant changes were observed between groups for cognitive functioning (p = 0.021) and quality of life for EUROQoL 5D (p = 0.006). Our findings confirm that a multicomponent exercise program improves measures of physical/cognitive functioning and quality of life in the elderly with NSCLC under adjuvant therapy or palliative treatment. This is an interesting and important study that adds to our current body of knowledge on the safety of exercise interventions, especially in the elderly with solid tumors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

26 pages, 604 KiB  
Review
The Quality of Life and Psychosocial Implications of Cancer-Related Lower-Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Catharine Bowman, Katherine-Ann Piedalue, Mohamad Baydoun and Linda E. Carlson
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3200; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103200 - 2 Oct 2020
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 4740
Abstract
Lower-extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a progressive, lifelong complication of cancer that places a substantial burden upon cancer survivors’ quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial well-being. Despite its prevalence, cancer-related LEL is inconsistently diagnosed, treated, and poorly recognized by health care professionals. The purpose [...] Read more.
Lower-extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a progressive, lifelong complication of cancer that places a substantial burden upon cancer survivors’ quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial well-being. Despite its prevalence, cancer-related LEL is inconsistently diagnosed, treated, and poorly recognized by health care professionals. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and appraise the quantitative literature evaluating the impact of cancer-related LEL on patients’ psychosocial well-being and QOL. Three databases (PubMed, PROQuest, and Scopus) were searched for observational research articles published before May 1st, 2020. Twenty-one articles were eligible (cross-sectional (n = 16), prospective cohort designs (n = 3), and retrospective cohort designs (n = 2)). The majority of studies reported a negative relationship between cancer-related LEL and global QOL and/or one or more psychosocial domains including (1) physical and functional; (2) psycho-emotional; (3) social, relational and financial. A greater number of LEL symptoms and higher LEL severity were associated with poorer QOL. Although the evidence to date suggests a negative relationship between cancer-related LEL and patients’ QOL and psychosocial well-being, there is a substantial need for longitudinal analyses to examine the directionality and temporality of this effect in order to inform cancer survivorship care modelling and improve patient outcomes after cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

2 pages, 162 KiB  
Addendum
Addendum: MacDonald, A.M., et al. CaRE @ Home: Pilot Study of an Online Multidimensional Cancer Rehabilitation and Exercise Program for Cancer Survivors. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3092
by Anne Marie MacDonald, Aleksandra Chafranskaia, Christian J. Lopez, Manjula Maganti, Lori J. Bernstein, Eugene Chang, David Michael Langelier, Maya Obadia, Beth Edwards, Paul Oh, Jacqueline L. Bender, Shabbir M.H. Alibhai and Jennifer M. Jones
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(11), 3440; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113440 - 26 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1254
Abstract
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship)
Back to TopTop