jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 June 2022) | Viewed by 34659

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 14110, USA
Interests: platelets; coagulation; clinical trials; vascular disease; antiplatelet agents; anticoagulants
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The area of vascular pharmacology is on the move, and is rapidly evolving. New knowledge, however, suggests that sometimes data generated in clinical trials contradicts real-life clinical scenarios. Numerous researchers and practitioners have discussed the clinical features of various cardiac diseases and optimal therapeutic options. In general, they have agreed that many patients require individual approach to yield better outcomes. Also, major outcomes may be different because of ethnicity, drug doses and regiments challenging uniformed therapeutic recommendations. In summary, this Special Issue will focus on various approaches of national pharmaceutical management in vascular diseases, diabetes, stroke and arrhythmias. We are expecting healthy friendly dialog debating these critical issues among top research groups.

Dr. Victor Serebruany
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Antiplatelet Therapy
  • Anticoagulants
  • Vascular Disease
  • Diabetes
  • Stroke
  • Arrhythmia
  • Pharmacology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

13 pages, 2019 KiB  
Article
Differences in Optimal Platelet Reactivity after Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by Kai Song, Xuan Jin, Moo-Hyun Kim, Jia-Xin Li, Cai-De Jin, Song-Lin Yuan, Zhao-Yan Song, En-Ze Jin, Kwang-Min Lee, Kyung-Hee Lim and Young-Rak Cho
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2480; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092480 - 28 Apr 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1741
Abstract
Background: East Asian patients receiving treatment with the potent P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor experience more potent platelet inhibition than with clopidogrel. Methods: This study investigated differences in OPR rates with reduced doses of prasugrel (n = 38) or [...] Read more.
Background: East Asian patients receiving treatment with the potent P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor experience more potent platelet inhibition than with clopidogrel. Methods: This study investigated differences in OPR rates with reduced doses of prasugrel (n = 38) or ticagrelor (n = 40) for maintenance therapy in 118 Korean ACS patients who had undergone PCI, in comparison to conventional-dose clopidogrel (n = 40). We assessed drug responses at one- and three-months post-PCI with VerifyNow and multiple electrode aggregometry assays. Results: At the one-month period, patients receiving standard-dose prasugrel or ticagrelor had lower platelet reactivity as determined by the three assays than those receiving the conventional dose of clopidogrel (VN: p = 0.000; MEA: p = 0.000; LTA: p = 0.000). At the 3-month point, platelet reactivity was lower in those receiving reduced-dose prasugrel or ticagrelor than the clopidogrel-treated patients (VN: p = 0.000; MEA: p = 0.012; LTA: p = 0.002). Prasugrel resulted in significantly lower platelet inhibition than ticagrelor as determined by VN and LTA (VN: p = 0.000; LTA: p = 0.003). At three months, there was a significant overall difference in OPR among the three groups when measured by VN (p < 0.001), but not when measured by MEA (p = 0.596). OPR in the reduced-dose prasugrel group was not significantly different to the clopidogrel group at three months (VN: p = 0.180; MEA: p = 0.711). OPR in the reduced-dose ticagrelor group was similar to clopidogrel as determined by MEA at three months, but was different when assessed by VN (VN: p = 0.000; MEA: p = 0.540). Compared to standard-dose, the reduced-dose prasugrel OPR rate was significantly increased (VN: p = 0.008; MEA: p = 0.020). Conclusions: OPR values for reduced-dose prasugrel and conventional-dose clopidogrel at three months were similar but higher than for reduced-dose ticagrelor as determined by VN, but no differences were noted by MEA. The MEA assay might have less sensitivity and consistency than the VN assay. Further studies are needed to explore this discrepancy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1794 KiB  
Article
Effect of Sulodexide on Circulating Blood Cells in Patients with Mild COVID-19
by Arthur Melkumyants, Lyudmila Buryachkovskaya, Nikita Lomakin, Olga Antonova, Julia Docenko, Vladimir Ermishkin and Victor Serebruany
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1995; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071995 - 2 Apr 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2683
Abstract
Background. Despite the fact that COVID-19 usually manifests with severe pneumonia, there is a growing body of evidence that life-threatening multiorgan damage is caused by vascular and hemostatic abnormalities. Since there is no established therapy, assessing antithrombotics is indeed important. Sulodexide, a compound [...] Read more.
Background. Despite the fact that COVID-19 usually manifests with severe pneumonia, there is a growing body of evidence that life-threatening multiorgan damage is caused by vascular and hemostatic abnormalities. Since there is no established therapy, assessing antithrombotics is indeed important. Sulodexide, a compound derived from porcine intestinal mucosa is a mixture of fast-moving heparin fraction (80%) and dermatan sulfate (20%), is approved in Europe and currently in trials for COVID-19 indication. Methods. This single-center, prospective, observational study included 28 patients with mild COVID-19 hospitalized in the Central Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation. Patients in the control group (n = 14) were treated using routine therapy according to current guidelines, while patients in the experimental group (n = 14) had the routine treatment supplemented with daily intravenous injections of sulodexide in 600-unit doses. Scanning electron microscopy was utilized to examine the blood specimens derived from the cubital vein at admission and at 10 days after hospitalization, which was approximately the average duration of patients’ treatment in the hospital (11.6 ± 0.4 days). Results. Sulodexide significantly (by 40%) diminished the score of circulating endothelial cells, potentially indicating its antiviral endothelium-protective properties. It also prevented the extra activation of the platelets and the formation of erythrocytic sludges. Among patients in the control group, the share of activated platelets rose from 37 ± 5% to 45 ± 6% (p = 0.04) over the course of the study period, whereas among patients in the experimental group, the share of activated platelets remained practically unchanged (43 ± 6% vs. 38 ± 4%, p = 0.22). The score of erythrocytic sludges in the control group remained practically the same (4.8 ± 1.1 at admission vs. 3.9 ± 0.9 after 10 days, p = 0.67), whereas in the experimental group, it significantly decreased (from 5.7 ± 1.7 to 2.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.03). Conclusions. Sulodexide is able to defend endothelium, normalize blood, and, seemingly, prevent thrombosis. Therefore, it may be considered as a promising and effective agent for the treatment of patients with mild COVID-19. Broader randomized trials are needed to assess whether the observed findings will transform into sustained long-term clinical benefit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1129 KiB  
Article
RETRACTED: Validation of the CHA2DS2-VA Score (Excluding Female Sex) in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
by Sun Young Choi, Moo Hyun Kim, Hyo Bin Kim, Sa Yul Kang, Kwang Min Lee, Kyung-Yae Hyun and Sung-Cheol Yun
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1823; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071823 - 25 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2523 | Retraction
Abstract
Sex (i.e., female sex) confers one point for the CHA2DS2-VASc score. For this reason, females with atrial fibrillation (AF) always have a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 1. To compare the CHA2DS2-VA (excluding female sex) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in Korean AF patients using [...] Read more.
Sex (i.e., female sex) confers one point for the CHA2DS2-VASc score. For this reason, females with atrial fibrillation (AF) always have a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 1. To compare the CHA2DS2-VA (excluding female sex) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in Korean AF patients using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we analyzed the risk of ischemic stroke in nonvalvular AF patients between 2013 and 2017. The predictive values of the CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for ischemic stroke were evaluated using the C-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI). The primary outcome was the occurrence of ischemic stroke. A total of 185,637 patients with AF (49.7% women) were included in this study. The mean ages were 66.5 years for females and 64.9 years for males. The incidence of ischemic stroke in male patients was similar to females (3.63%/year vs. 3.72%/year, p = 0.273, respectively). In addition, no sex difference was apparent for stroke risk in AF patients stratified by risk factor component and age group. In the C-statistic analysis, the predictive ability of the CHA2DS2-VA score for ischemic stroke was similar to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Additionally, CHA2DS2-VA performed better for predicting ischemic stroke in AF patients with risk scores of ≥2 (AUC 0.701 vs. 0.689, z = 4.596, p < 0.001) or those aged ≥75 years (AUC 0.715 vs. 0.701, z = 4.957, p < 0.001). In Korean AF patients, female sex is not a specific risk factor that contributes to the development of ischemic stroke. The CHA2DS2-VA score, which excludes female sex, may be a more suitable risk score for guiding anticoagulation decisions in Korean AF patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 942 KiB  
Article
Should We Monitor Glucose and Biomarkers in Diabetics over Heart Surgery?
by Elena Z. Golukhova, Ljubov S. Lifanova, Yaroslava V. Pugovkina, Marina V. Grigoryan and Naida I. Bulaeva
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3399; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153399 - 30 Jul 2021
Viewed by 1872
Abstract
Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). While there is a consensus that blood glucose control may benefit patients undergoing CABG, the role of biomarkers, optimal method, and duration of such monitoring are still unclear. The aim of [...] Read more.
Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). While there is a consensus that blood glucose control may benefit patients undergoing CABG, the role of biomarkers, optimal method, and duration of such monitoring are still unclear. The aim of this study is to define the efficacy of a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and link it to pro-inflammatory biomarkers while on insulin pump therapy in diabetic patients undergoing CABG. We prospectively assessed CGMS for 72 h in 105 patients including 52 diabetics undergoing isolated CABG. In diabetics, CGMS was connected to an insulin pump for precise glucose control. On top of conventional biomarkers (HbA1C, lipid profile), high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Regulated upon Activation Normal T cell Expressed and presumably Secreted (RANTES), and leptin levels were collected before surgery, 1 h, 12 h, 7 days, and at 1 year after CABG. Overall, CGMS revealed high glucose independently from underlying diabetes during first 48 h following CABG but was higher (p < 0.05) in diabetics. The insulin pump improved glycemic control over early follow-up (72 h) post-CABG. There were no hypoglycemic episodes in patients on insulin pump therapy and those receiving bolus insulin therapy. We revealed a lower rate of postpericardiotomy syndrome (PCTS) in patients on insulin pump therapy compared to patients prescribed bolus insulin therapy in the early postoperative period (p = 0.03). Hs-CRP and RANTES levels were lower in patients with T2DM on insulin pump therapy compared to patients prescribed bolus insulin therapy in the early postoperative period (p < 0.05). It is most likely due to the fact that insulin pump therapy decreases systemic inflammatory response. Further controlled trials should assess whether CGMS improves outcomes after cardiac surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

5 pages, 808 KiB  
Article
Misreported Cancer Deaths in PLATO Trial
by Victor Serebruany and Jean-Francois Tanguay
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(14), 3140; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143140 - 16 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2079
Abstract
The potential link between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with excess cancer deaths (CD) was reported first for prasugrel (TRITON, DAPT), clopidogrel (DAPT), vorapaxar (TRACER), apixaban (APPRAISE-2), and later ticagrelor (PEGASUS). However, verified CD in the ticagrelor indication-seeking PLATO were not public. We obtained [...] Read more.
The potential link between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with excess cancer deaths (CD) was reported first for prasugrel (TRITON, DAPT), clopidogrel (DAPT), vorapaxar (TRACER), apixaban (APPRAISE-2), and later ticagrelor (PEGASUS). However, verified CD in the ticagrelor indication-seeking PLATO were not public. We obtained the complete list of deaths and their primary causes in PLATO, matched that dataset against local site records, and analyzed the patterns of CD reporting. The FDA-issued spreadsheet contains 31 precisely detailed CD (PLATO code 12-3). We obtained local site evidence for four CD and matched them with FDA-reported. We also assessed the patterns of how CD were reported among non-vascular death database column “S” by scrolling the FDA Excel file down among 938 PLATO entries. Clopidogrel CD (n = 17) were reported exclusively by sponsor, while independent CRO’s reported only ticagrelor CD (3 out of 14 PLATO total). Among four matched verified outcomes, one ticagrelor CD was correct, second ticagrelor CD was unreported, and two (ticagrelor and clopidogrel) CD were reported inaccurately. Of the remaining 16 clopidogrel CD six were reported as three separate next in line paired entries in Denmark (236–237), Poland (597–598), Romania (679–680), and as two more fatalities in South Africa (786) and Spain (789), while patients 787 and 788 received ticagrelor out of 938 records suggesting possible late addition of incorrect clopidogrel CD reports. We conclude that some CD were misreported in PLATO, favoring ticagrelor. Such mismatch may require reevaluation of this critical outcome in the trial focusing on the exact death cause reported by site investigators. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1280 KiB  
Article
Pharmacodynamics and Outcomes of a De-Escalation Strategy with Half-Dose Prasugrel or Ticagrelor in East Asians Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results from HOPE-TAILOR Trial
by Cai-De Jin, Moo-Hyun Kim, Kai Song, Xuan Jin, Kwang-Min Lee, Jong-Sung Park, Young-Rak Cho, Sung-Cheol Yun and Michael S. Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(12), 2699; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122699 - 18 Jun 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3113
Abstract
East Asians treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) generally experience more intense platelet inhibitory responses resulting in an increased risk of major bleeding. Whether a half-dose de-escalation strategy improves the net clinical benefit in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [...] Read more.
East Asians treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) generally experience more intense platelet inhibitory responses resulting in an increased risk of major bleeding. Whether a half-dose de-escalation strategy improves the net clinical benefit in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains uncertain. A total of 120 patients were pragmatically randomized to either prasugrel (n = 39, 60 mg loading dose (LD)/10 mg maintenance dose (MD)), ticagrelor (n = 40, 180 mg LD/90 mg MD), or clopidogrel (n = 41, 600 mg LD/75 mg MD) followed by a half-dose reduction at 1 month, or conventional dose 75 mg clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the incidence of optimal platelet reactivity (OPR), defined as a P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value between 85 and 208 (by VerifyNow) at 3 months. Ticagrelor treatment achieved a significantly lower PRU compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel (31.0 ± 34.5 vs. 93.2 ± 57.1 vs. 153.1 ± 69.4), resulting in the lowest rate of OPR (12.5% vs. 48.7% vs. 63.4%). At 9 months, the minor bleeding was significantly higher with potent P2Y12 inhibitors than with clopidogrel (31.6% vs. 12.2%; HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.12–7.75). Only a few patients experienced ischemic complications. In Korean ACS patients, a de-escalation strategy with half-dose ticagrelor and prasugrel from standard dose increased the OPR rate significantly. Half-dose ticagrelor had a lower OPR rate and greater platelet inhibition compared with half-dose prasugrel as well as conventional-dose clopidogrel. Optimal dose reduction strategies for potent P2Y12 inhibitors require further investigation to balance safety and efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1207 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Performance between ARC-HBR Criteria and PRECISE-DAPT Score in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by Sun Young Choi, Moo-Hyun Kim, Kwang-Min Lee, Yeo-Gyeong Ko, Chan-Ho Yoon, Min-Kyeong Jo and Sung-Cheol Yun
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(12), 2566; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122566 - 10 Jun 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2989
Abstract
The proper management of bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical. Recently, the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria have been proposed as a standardized tool for predicting bleeding risk. We sought to compare the predictive [...] Read more.
The proper management of bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical. Recently, the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria have been proposed as a standardized tool for predicting bleeding risk. We sought to compare the predictive performance of ARC-HBR criteria and the PRECISE-DAPT score for bleeding in Korean patients undergoing PCI. We recruited 1418 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from January 2012 through December 2018 (Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea). The ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT scores showed a high AUC for three bleeding definitions (AUC 0.75 and 0.77 for BARC 3 to 5; AUC 0.68 and 0.71 for TIMI minor to major; AUC 0.81 and 0.82 for GUSTO moderate to severe, respectively) and all-cause death (AUC 0.82 and 0.82, respectively). When compared with the ARC-HBR score, the discriminant ability of the PRECISE-DAPT score was not significantly different for bleeding events and all-cause death. The ARC-HBR criteria and PRECISE-DAPT scores demonstrated reasonably good discriminatory capacity with respect to 1-year bleeding events in Korean patients treated with DAPT, regardless of the bleeding definition. Our findings also suggest that the simple PRECISE-DAPT score is as useful as ARC-HBR criteria in predicting bleeding and all-cause death after PCI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 852 KiB  
Article
Switching Ticagrelor to 600 mg or 300 mg Clopidogrel Loading Bridge in Patients with Unstable Angina
by Sinem Cakal, Beytullah Cakal, Zafer Güven, Aydın Rodi Tosu, Muhsin Kalyoncuoglu, Halil Ibrahim Biter, Ziya Apaydın, Ibrahim Oguz Karaca, Erdal Belen and Mehmet Mustafa Can
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(11), 2463; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112463 - 2 Jun 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 6940
Abstract
Ticagrelor is believed to be a more potent and faster antiplatelet agent compared with clopidogrel and may result in lower ischemic outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, the best strategy of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel is unclear. Current guidelines advocate [...] Read more.
Ticagrelor is believed to be a more potent and faster antiplatelet agent compared with clopidogrel and may result in lower ischemic outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, the best strategy of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel is unclear. Current guidelines advocate clopidogrel bridging with a 600 mg loading dose (LD). This study aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of switching protocols from ticagrelor to clopidogrel 600 mg or 300 mg LD in patients with unstable angina pectoris (USAP). One hundred and eighty patients with USAP undergoing adhoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received preprocedural ticagrelor 180 mg/daily. The decision to switch antiplatelet therapy to clopidogrel with either 300 mg LD or 600 mg LD at 12 h was left to the discretion of the treating physician. The primary outcome was a composite of an efficacy endpoint major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and a safety endpoint Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale (BARC) (≥1). There were no differences in our composite clinical endpoint of MACCE between the two strategies, with one event occurring in each group. One patient in each group had myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis, and the patient in the 300 mg switching group died due to stent thrombosis. No difference between the two arms was observed in terms of BARC bleeding criteria. This study showed that among USAP patients undergoing PCI, switching to clopidogrel with 300 mg LD showed no significant difference compared to 600 mg clopidogrel LD. Ticagrelor LD in ad hoc PCI and de-escalation to clopidogrel with 300 mg LD could translate to lower costs for patients with USAP without compromising safety and efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1294 KiB  
Article
Predicting One-Year Deaths and Major Adverse Vascular Events with the Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Elderly Patients with Non–ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by Muhsin Kalyoncuoğlu, Fahrettin Katkat, Halil Ibrahim Biter, Sinem Cakal, Aydin Rodi Tosu and Mehmet Mustafa Can
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(11), 2247; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112247 - 22 May 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2386
Abstract
The prognostic value of malnutrition in elderly patients with non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is not fully understood. Nutritional characteristics were evaluated by novel Controlling Nutritional status (CONUT), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) scores. The impact of [...] Read more.
The prognostic value of malnutrition in elderly patients with non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is not fully understood. Nutritional characteristics were evaluated by novel Controlling Nutritional status (CONUT), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) scores. The impact of these scores on major outcomes in 253 NSTEMI patients over 60 years and older were assessed. Compared to those with good nutritional status; malnourished patients had more major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at 1-year follow up. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed that CONUT (hazard ratio = 1.372; p < 0.01) was independent predictor of MACCEs, whereas PNI (p = 0.44) and GNRI (p = 0.52) were not. The discriminating power of the CONUT (AUC: 0.79) was adequate and significantly superior to both the PNI (AUC: 0.68) and the GNRI (AUC: 0.60), with a p-value for both < 0.01. Patients with elevated CONUT exhibited the highest event rate for all-cause mortality and MACCEs in survival analysis (p < 0.01). We conclude that malnutrition is strongly associated with adverse outcomes in older patients with NSTEMI. In fact, the CONUT score adequately predicts one-year MACCEs among elderly NSTEMI patients who achieve complete revascularization after coronary intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2021 KiB  
Article
Risk Stratification after an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Significance of Antithrombotic Therapy
by Victoria A. Brazhnik, Larisa O. Minushkina, Olga I. Boeva, Niyaz R. Khasanov, Elena D. Kosmacheva, Marina A. Chichkova and Dmitry A. Zateyshchikov
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(8), 1572; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081572 - 8 Apr 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2563
Abstract
The impact of the de-escalation strategy of antiplatelet therapy (APT) on the life expectancy after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires an assessment in real clinical practice. Into the Russian multicentral observational trial (ORACLE II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04068909), 1803 [...] Read more.
The impact of the de-escalation strategy of antiplatelet therapy (APT) on the life expectancy after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires an assessment in real clinical practice. Into the Russian multicentral observational trial (ORACLE II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04068909), 1803 patients with ACS and PCI indications were enrolled. During 12 months of follow-up, 228 all-cause deaths have occurred. The analysis of death predictors was carried out by the classification tree method. Age, an option of antithrombotic therapy, a history of chronic heart failure, and uric acid level had the greatest prognostic value. The death prediction model’s sensitivity was 82.1% in the training cohort and 79.2% in the test cohort. During the observation period, ticagrelor was replaced with clopidogrel (APT de-escalation) in 357 patients. The groups of patients with different antiplatelet therapy options were adjusted for clinical parameters by the pseudorandomization method. The de-escalation group had the lowerest all-cause death rate. The incidence of bleeding and recurrent nonfatal coronary events in the study groups did not differ significantly. Thus, the APT regimen’s advantage of changing from the maximum in the first weeks after ACS to moderate at follow-up has been confirmed. There is an obvious need to study the possibilities of individualizing antiplatelet therapy in patients after acute coronary syndromes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 7954 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban in over 3.9 Million People with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Benjamin J. R. Buckley, Deirdre A. Lane, Peter Calvert, Juqian Zhang, David Gent, C. Daniel Mullins, Paul Dorian, Shun Kohsaka, Stefan H. Hohnloser and Gregory Y. H. Lip
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(13), 3788; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133788 - 30 Jun 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4390
Abstract
Background: There is a plethora of real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs); however, study heterogeneity has contributed to inconsistent findings. We compared the effectiveness and safety of apixaban with those of other direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and [...] Read more.
Background: There is a plethora of real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs); however, study heterogeneity has contributed to inconsistent findings. We compared the effectiveness and safety of apixaban with those of other direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA e.g., warfarin). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted retrieving data from PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science from January 2009 to December 2021. Studies that evaluated apixaban (intervention) prescribed for adults (aged 18 years or older) with AF for stroke prevention compared to other DOACs or VKAs were identified. Primary outcomes included stroke/systemic embolism (SE), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised trials were considered for inclusion. Results: In total, 67 studies were included, and 38 studies were meta-analysed. Participants taking apixaban had significantly lower stroke/SE compared to patients taking VKAs (relative risk (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–0.93, I2 = 94%) and dabigatran (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95, I2 = 66%), but not to patients administered rivaroxaban. There was no statistical difference in mortality between apixaban and VKAs or apixaban and dabigatran. Compared to patients administered rivaroxaban, participants taking apixaban had lower mortality rates (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.96, I2 = 96%). Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKAs (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.52–0.65, I2 = 90%), dabigatran (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.88, I2 = 78%) and rivaroxaban (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.70, I2 = 87%). Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with a better overall safety and effectiveness profile compared to VKAs and other DOACs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop