jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Epidemiology & Public Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 May 2022) | Viewed by 12953

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Interests: critical care medicine; sepsis; pain management; anesthetics; sedation; cognitive disorders; delirium

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Millions of patients are treated in intensive care units worldwide every year. In developed countries, up to 20% of in-patient sector-related healthcare costs account for these patients in the acute phase of their disease. Survivors of critical illness frequently suffer from long-term consequences such as cognitive disturbances, impaired physical function, mental illness, and a reduced HRQuoL. Frequently, these domains are summarized as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The trajectory of critically ill patients during their recovery is influenced by a number of different factors involving the in- and out-patient sector. This issue focuses on prevention, diagnostics, and treatment of critically ill patients with a focus on outcomes, pre-morbid status, preventive measures during the acute phase of illness, diagnostic tools, and tests to evaluate for PICS and post-ICU dysfunctions.

All kinds of interventional, diagnostic, and observational studies are welcome.

Dr. Björn Weiss
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Intensive care unit
  • Cognitive disturbances
  • Impaired physical function, Mental illness
  • Post-intensive care syndrome
  • Health-related quality of life

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 201 KiB  
Editorial
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome after Critical Illness: An Imperative for Effective Prevention
by Nicolas Paul and Björn Weiss
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(20), 6203; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206203 - 21 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1853
Abstract
Over the last decades, the importance of intensive care has considerably increased [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

12 pages, 1152 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Delirium in Neurological Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Single-Center Interrupted Time Series Trial
by Paul J. T. Rood, Dharmanand Ramnarain, Annemarie W. Oldenbeuving, Brenda L. den Oudsten, Sjaak Pouwels, Lex M. van Loon, Steven Teerenstra, Peter Pickkers, Jolanda de Vries and Mark van den Boogaard
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(18), 5820; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185820 - 7 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2309
Abstract
Background: Delirium is a pathobiological brain process that is frequently observed in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, and is associated with longer hospitalization as well as long-term cognitive impairment. In neurological ICU patients, delirium may be more treatment-resistant due to the initial [...] Read more.
Background: Delirium is a pathobiological brain process that is frequently observed in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, and is associated with longer hospitalization as well as long-term cognitive impairment. In neurological ICU patients, delirium may be more treatment-resistant due to the initial brain injury. This study examined the effects of a multicomponent non-pharmacological nursing intervention program on delirium in neurological ICU patients. Methods: A single-center interrupted time series trial was conducted in adult neurological ICU patients at high risk for developing delirium who were non-delirious at admission. A multicomponent nursing intervention program focusing on modifiable risk factors for delirium, including the optimalization of vision, hearing, orientation and cognition, sleep and mobilization, was implemented as the standard of care, and its effects were studied. The primary outcome was the number of delirium-free and coma-free days alive at 28 days after ICU admission. The secondary outcomes included delirium incidence and duration, ICU and hospital length-of-stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Results: Of 289 eligible patients admitted to the ICU, 130 patients were included, with a mean age of 68 ± 11 years, a mean APACHE-IV score of 79 ± 25 and a median predicted delirium risk (E-PRE-DELIRIC) score of 42 [IQR 38–50]). Of these, 73 were included in the intervention period and 57 in the control period. The median delirium- and coma-free days alive were 15 days [IQR 0–26] in the intervention group and 10 days [IQR 0–24] in the control group (level change −0.48 days, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) −7 to 6 days, p = 0.87; slope change −0.95 days, 95%CI −2.41 to 0.52 days, p = 0.18). Conclusions: In neurological ICU patients, our multicomponent non-pharmacological nursing intervention program did not change the number of delirium-free and coma-free days alive after 28 days. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1180 KiB  
Article
Total Plasma Exchange in Neuromuscular Junction Disorders—A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy, Safety and Potential Diagnostic Properties in Doubtful Diagnosis
by Andreas Totzeck, Michael Jahn, Benjamin Stolte, Andreas Thimm, Christoph Kleinschnitz and Tim Hagenacker
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4383; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154383 - 28 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1879
Abstract
Neuromuscular junction disorders (NJDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including myasthenia gravis (MG). In some cases, patients are present with myasthenic symptoms without evidence of autoimmune antibodies, making diagnosis challenging. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has proven efficacy in NJDs. The objective is [...] Read more.
Neuromuscular junction disorders (NJDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including myasthenia gravis (MG). In some cases, patients are present with myasthenic symptoms without evidence of autoimmune antibodies, making diagnosis challenging. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has proven efficacy in NJDs. The objective is to describe the safety and efficacy of TPE in NJD patients with questionable disease activity or uncertain diagnosis in order to assess the diagnostic potential of TPE. We report an observational, retrospective cohort study of clinical routine data. All the data were derived from the electronic medical records of the Department of Neurology at University Hospital Essen. We searched for patients with NJDs between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2021. Of the 303 patients who presented to the department with NJDs, 20 were treated with TPE; 9 patients did not show a measurable benefit from TPE (45%), 6 of whom were diagnosed with seronegative MG. Of these, 3 (50%) had long-standing ocular symptoms. There were decreases in the mean arterial pressure, hemoglobin, hematocrit and fibrinogen during treatment, which were not considered clinically relevant. In (seronegative) myasthenic patients, TPE may help to verify an uncertain diagnosis or to reveal possible muscle damage, allowing unnecessary therapy to be avoided. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 411 KiB  
Article
A Modified Physical Disability Screening Model after Treatment in the Intensive Care Unit: A Nationwide Derivation-Validation Study
by Malihe Sadat Moayed, Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Keivan Gohari-Moghadam, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Željko Reiner and Amirhossein Sahebkar
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123251 - 7 Jun 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1480
Abstract
Background: Many of the survivors of critical illnesses in the intensive care unit (ICU) suffer from physical disability for months after the treatment in the ICU. Identifying patients who are susceptible to disability is essential. The purpose of the study was to modify [...] Read more.
Background: Many of the survivors of critical illnesses in the intensive care unit (ICU) suffer from physical disability for months after the treatment in the ICU. Identifying patients who are susceptible to disability is essential. The purpose of the study was to modify a model for early in-ICU prediction of the patient’s risk for physical disability two months after the treatment in the ICU. Methods: A prospective multicenter derivation–validation study was conducted from 1 July 2015, to 31 August 2016. We modified a model consisting of three risk factors in the derivation group and tested the modified model in the validation group. They were asked for their physical abilities before being admitted, two months after discharge from the ICU by a binary ADL staircases questionnaire. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to modify physical disability components in the derivation data set. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the threshold values in the validation group. Results: Five-hundred nineteen survivors were enrolled in the derivation group, and 271 in the validation. In multivariable analysis, the odds ratio (OR) of physical disability significantly increased with educational level ≤ elementary school (OR: 36.96, 95%CI: 18.14–75.29), inability to sit without support (OR: 15.16, 95%CI: 7.98–28.80), and having a fracture (OR: 12.74, 95%CI: 4.47–36.30). The multivariable validation model indicated that education level, inability to sit without support, and having a fracture simultaneously had sensitivity 71.3%, specificity 88.2%, LR+ 6.0, LR− 0.33, PPV 90.9, and NPV 64.9 to predict physical disability. Applying the coefficients derived from the multivariable logistic regression fitted on the derivation dataset in the validation dataset and computing diagnostic index sensitivity 100%, specificity 60.5%, LR+ 2.5, LR− 0.003, PPV 80.8, and NPV 100. The modified model had an excellent prediction ability for physical disability (AUC ± SE = 0.881 ± 0.016). Conclusions: Low education level, inability to sit without support, and having a fracture in a modified model were associated with the development of physical disability after discharge from ICU. Therefore, these clinical variables should be considered when organizing follow-up care for ICU survivors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2891 KiB  
Article
Sex-Specific Aspects of Skeletal Muscle Metabolism in the Clinical Context of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness
by Lilian Jo Engelhardt, Julius J. Grunow, Tobias Wollersheim, Niklas M. Carbon, Felix Balzer, Joachim Spranger and Steffen Weber-Carstens
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(3), 846; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030846 - 5 Feb 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3204 | Correction
Abstract
(1) Background: Female sex is considered a risk factor for Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness (ICUAW). The aim is to investigate sex-specific aspects of skeletal muscle metabolism in the context of ICUAW. (2) Methods: This is a sex-specific sub-analysis from two prospectively conducted trials [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Female sex is considered a risk factor for Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness (ICUAW). The aim is to investigate sex-specific aspects of skeletal muscle metabolism in the context of ICUAW. (2) Methods: This is a sex-specific sub-analysis from two prospectively conducted trials examining skeletal muscle metabolism and advanced muscle activating measures in critical illness. Muscle strength was assessed by Medical Research Council Score. The insulin sensitivity index was analyzed by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic (HE) clamp. Muscular metabolites were studied by microdialysis. M. vastus lateralis biopsies were taken. The molecular analysis included protein degradation pathways. Morphology was assessed by myocyte cross-sectional area (MCSA). Multivariable linear regression models for the effect of sex on outcome parameters were performed. (3) Results: n = 83 (♂n = 57, 68.7%; ♀n = 26, 31.3%) ICU patients were included. ICUAW was present in 81.1%♂ and in 82.4%♀ at first awakening (p = 0.911) and in 59.5%♂ and in 70.6%♀ at ICU discharge (p = 0.432). Insulin sensitivity index was reduced more in women than in men (p = 0.026). Sex was significantly associated with insulin sensitivity index and MCSA of Type IIa fibers in the adjusted regression models. (4) Conclusion: This hypothesis-generating analysis suggests that more pronounced impairments in insulin sensitivity and lower MCSA of Type IIa fibers in critically ill women may be relevant for sex differences in ICUAW. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 743 KiB  
Article
Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Sedated with Intravenous Lormetazepam or Midazolam: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Björn Weiss, David Hilfrich, Gerald Vorderwülbecke, Maria Heinrich, Julius J. Grunow, Nicolas Paul, Jochen Kruppa, Bruno Neuner, Berthold Drexler, Felix Balzer and Claudia D. Spies
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4091; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184091 - 10 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2730
Abstract
The benzodiazepine, midazolam, is one of the most frequently used sedatives in intensive care medicine, but it has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile when continuously applied. As a consequence, patients are frequently prolonged and more deeply sedated than intended. Due to its distinct pharmacological [...] Read more.
The benzodiazepine, midazolam, is one of the most frequently used sedatives in intensive care medicine, but it has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile when continuously applied. As a consequence, patients are frequently prolonged and more deeply sedated than intended. Due to its distinct pharmacological features, including a cytochrome P450-independent metabolization, intravenous lormetazepam might be clinically advantageous compared to midazolam. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared patients who received either intravenous lormetazepam or midazolam with respect to their survival and sedation characteristics. The cohort included 3314 mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients that received one of the two drugs in a tertiary medical center in Germany between 2006 and 2018. A Cox proportional hazards model with mortality as outcome and APACHE II, age, gender, and admission mode as covariates revealed a hazard ratio of 1.75 [95% CI 1.46–2.09; p < 0.001] for in-hospital mortality associated with the use of midazolam. After additionally adjusting for sedation intensity, the HR became 1.04 [95% CI 0.83–1.31; p = 0.97]. Thus, we concluded that excessive sedation occurs more frequently in critically ill patients treated with midazolam than in patients treated with lormetazepam. These findings require further investigation in prospective trials to assess if lormetazepam, due to its ability to maintain light sedation, might be favorable over other benzodiazepines for sedation in the ICU. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 931 KiB  
Article
Plasma Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Is Useful for Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients
by Izabela Duda and Łukasz Krzych
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(12), 2576; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122576 - 10 Jun 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1789
Abstract
Elevated neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) occurs in a wide range of systemic diseases. This study examined the clinical utility of plasma NGAL to predict intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients. A total of 62 patients hospitalized in a [...] Read more.
Elevated neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) occurs in a wide range of systemic diseases. This study examined the clinical utility of plasma NGAL to predict intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients. A total of 62 patients hospitalized in a mixed ICU were included; pNGAL, creatinine, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assayed on four consecutive days (D1-D4) following ICU admission. APACHE II score (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) was calculated 24 h post-admission. ICU mortality reached 35% and in-hospital mortality was 39%. The median pNGAL at admission was 142.5 (65.6–298.3) ng/mL. pNGAL was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors. The highest accuracy for ICU mortality prediction was achieved at the pNGAL cutoff of 93.91 ng/mL on D4 area under the curve (AUC) = 0.89; 95%CI 0.69–0.98 and for in-hospital mortality prediction was achieved at the pNGAL cutoff of 176.64 ng/mL on D3 (AUC = 0.86; 95%CI 0.69–0.96). The APACHE II score on ICU admission predicted ICU mortality with AUC = 0.89 (95%CI 0.79–0.96) and in-hospital mortality with AUC = 0.86 (95%CI 0.75–0.94). Although pNGAL on D1 poorly correlated with APACHE II (R = 0.3; p = 0.01), the combination of APACHE II and pNGAL on D1 predicted ICU mortality with AUC = 0.90 (95%CI 0.79–0.96) and in-hospital mortality with AUC = 0.95 (95%CI 0.78–0.99). Maximal CRP during study observation failed to predict ICU mortality (AUC = 0.62; 95%CI 0.49–0.74), but helped to predict in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.67; 95%CI 0.54–0.79). Plasma NGAL with combination with the indices of critical illness is a useful biomarker for predicting mortality in heterogeneous population of ICU patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

21 pages, 1080 KiB  
Review
Perceived Severity of Stressors in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Semi-Quantitative Analysis of the Literature on the Perspectives of Patients, Health Care Providers and Relatives
by Henning Krampe, Claudia Denke, Jakob Gülden, Vivian-Marie Mauersberger, Lukas Ehlen, Elena Schönthaler, Maximilian Markus Wunderlich, Alawi Lütz, Felix Balzer, Björn Weiss and Claudia D. Spies
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3928; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173928 - 31 Aug 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3931
Abstract
The aim of this study was to synthesize quantitative research that identified ranking lists of the most severe stressors of patients in the intensive care unit, as perceived by patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCP). We conducted a systematic literature search in [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to synthesize quantitative research that identified ranking lists of the most severe stressors of patients in the intensive care unit, as perceived by patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCP). We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from 1989 to 15 May 2020. Data were analyzed with descriptive and semi-quantitative methods to yield summarizing ranking lists of the most severe stressors. We synthesized the results of 42 prospective cross-sectional observational studies from different international regions. All investigations had assessed patient ratings. Thirteen studies also measured HCP ratings, and four studies included ratings of relatives. Data indicated that patients rate the severity of stressors lower than HCPs and relatives do. Out of all ranking lists, we extracted 137 stressor items that were most frequently ranked among the most severe stressors. After allocation to four domains, a group of clinical ICU experts sorted these stressors with good to excellent agreement according to their stress levels. Our results may contribute to improve HCPs’ and relatives’ understanding of patients’ perceptions of stressors in the ICU. The synthesized stressor rankings can be used for the development of new assessment instruments of stressors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Recovery after Intensive Care Medicine in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop