Journal of Personalized Medicine

Research

7 pages, 1422 KiB

Open AccessArticle

CD21^lo B Cells Could Be a Potential Predictor of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Renal Cell Carcinoma

by Kenichi Nishimura, Tatsuya Konishi, Toshiki Ochi, Ryuta Watanabe, Terutaka Noda, Tetsuya Fukumoto, Noriyoshi Miura, Yuki Miyauchi, Tadahiko Kikugawa, Katsuto Takenaka and Takashi Saika

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(6), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060888 - 28 May 2022

Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2629

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy increases the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In particular, combination checkpoint blockade (CCB) targeting inhibitory CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors could lead to irAEs at a higher rate than ICI monotherapy. Management of irAEs is important while using [...] Read more.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy increases the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In particular, combination checkpoint blockade (CCB) targeting inhibitory CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors could lead to irAEs at a higher rate than ICI monotherapy. Management of irAEs is important while using ICIs. However, there are no reliable biomarkers for predicting irAEs. The aim of this study was to elucidate early B cell changes after CCB therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and verify whether B cells can be a predictor of irAEs. This prospective cohort study was conducted with 23 Japanese patients with metastatic RCC. An increase in the proportion of CD21^lo B cells and CD21^lo memory B cells was confirmed following CCB therapy. Although there were no differences in clinical outcomes between irAE and no-irAE groups, the proportion of CD21^lo B cells at baseline was lower in the irAE group, with a significant increase after the first cycle of CCB therapy. Further analysis revealed a moderate correlation between irAEs and CD21^lo B cell levels at baseline (area under the curve: 0.83, cut-off: 3.13%, sensitivity: 92.3, specificity: 70.0). This finding indicates that patients with low baseline CD21^lo B cell levels warrant closer monitoring for irAEs. The clinical registration number by the Certified Review Board of Ehime University is No. 1902011. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 553 KiB

Open AccessArticle

High-Intensity Focused-Ultrasound Focal Therapy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Oncological and Functional Outcomes in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

by Łukasz Nyk, Wojciech Michalak, Stanisław Szempliński, Rafał Woźniak, Bartłomiej Zagożdżon, Wojciech Krajewski, Piotr Kryst, Hubert Kamecki and Sławomir Poletajew

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020251 - 9 Feb 2022

Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2413

Abstract

To compare oncological and functional outcomes of high-intensity focused-ultrasound (HIFU) focal therapy (FT) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in patients treated for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), we retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients comprising 30 men, who underwent HIFU-FT, and 96 [...] Read more.

To compare oncological and functional outcomes of high-intensity focused-ultrasound (HIFU) focal therapy (FT) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in patients treated for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), we retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients comprising 30 men, who underwent HIFU-FT, and 96 men who underwent LRP, in an academic center. Oncological outcomes were assessed based on the follow-up prostate-specific antigen values. We used the International Index of Erectile Function short form score to assess erectile function (EF). Urinary continence status was defined based on the number of pads used per day. Median follow-up was 12.5 and 19.1 months in the LRP and HIFU-FT groups, respectively. The effects were computed after propensity score matching and expressed as average treatment effect (ATE). Compared to LRP, HIFU-FT was associated with increased risk of treatment failure (ATE 0.103–0.164, depending on definition, p < 0.01) and lower risk of urinary incontinence (ATE −0.808 at 12 months, p < 0.01). Risk of erectile dysfunction was higher in the LRP group (ATE 5.092, p < 0.01). Our results demonstrate that HIFU-FT may be a reasonable treatment option in selected PCa patients, willing to preserve their EF and urinary continence yet accepting a higher risk of treatment failure. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1532 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Clinical Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (pT3-T4): Real-World Data from the Taiwan Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration Group

by Chung-Yu Lin, Han-Yu Weng, Ta-Yao Tai, Hsi-Chin Wu, Wen-Chi Chen, Chung-Hsin Chen, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chi-Wen Lo, Chih-Chin Yu, Chung-You Tsai, Wei-Che Wu, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu-Khun Lee, Thomas Y. Hsueh, Allen W. Chiu, Bing-Juin Chiang, Hsu-Che Huang, I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Yung-Tai Chen, Wei-Yu Lin, Chia-Chang Wu, Yao-Chou Tsai, Hsiang-Ying Lee and Wei-Ming Li Show full author list Hide full author list

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(2), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020226 - 6 Feb 2022

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2234

Abstract

The clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. We aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced UTUC (pT3-T4) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We retrospectively reviewed the data of 2108 patients from [...] Read more.

The clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. We aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced UTUC (pT3-T4) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We retrospectively reviewed the data of 2108 patients from the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group between 1988 and 2018. Comprehensive clinical features, pathological characteristics, and survival outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 533 patients with advanced UTUC included, 161 (30.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of overall death (hazard ratio (HR), 0.599; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.419–0.857; p = 0.005), cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.598; 95% CI, 0.391–0.914; p = 0.018), and cancer recurrence (HR, 0.456; 95% CI, 0.310–0.673; p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better five-year OS (64% vs. 50%, p = 0.002), CSS (70% vs. 62%, p = 0.043), and DFS (60% vs. 48%, p = 0.002) rates compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy after RNU had significant therapeutic benefits on OS, CSS, and DFS in advanced UTUC. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1174 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of the Predictive Role of Blood-Based Biomarkers in the Context of Suspicious Prostate MRI in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy

by Pawel Rajwa, Nicolai A. Huebner, Dadjar I. Hostermann, Nico C. Grossmann, Victor M. Schuettfort, Stephan Korn, Fahad Quhal, Frederik König, Hadi Mostafaei, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Keiichiro Mori, Reza Sari Motlagh, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Abdulmajeed Aydh, Piotr Bryniarski, Benjamin Pradere, Andrzej Paradysz, Pascal A. Baltzer, Bernhard Grubmüller and Shahrokh F. Shariat

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(11), 1231; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111231 - 19 Nov 2021

Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2541

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of pre-biopsy blood-based markers in patients undergoing a fusion biopsy for suspicious prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We identified 365 consecutive patients who underwent MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy for an MRI [...] Read more.

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of pre-biopsy blood-based markers in patients undergoing a fusion biopsy for suspicious prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We identified 365 consecutive patients who underwent MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy for an MRI scored Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System Version (PI-RADS) ≥ 3. We evaluated the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR,) de Ritis ratio, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI). Uni- and multivariable logistic models were used to analyze the association of the biomarkers with biopsy findings. The clinical benefits of biomarkers implemented in clinical decision-making were assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA). In total, 69% and 58% of patients were diagnosed with any prostate cancer and Gleason Grade (GG) ≥ 2, respectively. On multivariable analysis, only high dNLR (odds ratio (OR) 2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23–5.56, p = 0.02) and low PNI (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26–0.88, p = 0.02) remained independent predictors for GG ≥ 2. The logistic regression models with biomarkers reached AUCs of 0.824–0.849 for GG ≥ 2. The addition of dNLR and PNI did not enhance the net benefit of a standard clinical model. Finally, we created the nomogram that may help guide biopsy avoidance in patients with suspicious MRI. In patients with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions undergoing MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy, a high dNLR and low PNI were associated with unfavorable biopsy outcomes. Pre-biopsy blood-based biomarkers did not, however, significantly improve the discriminatory power and failed to add a clinical benefit beyond standard clinical factors. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2563 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Low Tumor-to-Stroma Ratio Reflects Protective Role of Stroma against Prostate Cancer Progression

by Paulina Nastały, Julia Smentoch, Marta Popęda, Emanuele Martini, Paolo Maiuri, Anna J. Żaczek, Marek Sowa, Marcin Matuszewski, Jolanta Szade, Leszek Kalinowski, Magdalena Niemira, Burkhard Brandt, Elke Eltze, Axel Semjonow and Natalia Bednarz-Knoll

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(11), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111088 - 26 Oct 2021

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2465

Abstract

Tumor-to-stroma ratio (TSR) is a prognostic factor that expresses the relative amounts of tumor and intratumoral stroma. In this study, its clinical and molecular relevance was evaluated in prostate cancer (PCa). The feasibility of automated quantification was tested in digital scans of tissue [...] Read more.

Tumor-to-stroma ratio (TSR) is a prognostic factor that expresses the relative amounts of tumor and intratumoral stroma. In this study, its clinical and molecular relevance was evaluated in prostate cancer (PCa). The feasibility of automated quantification was tested in digital scans of tissue microarrays containing 128 primary tumors from 72 PCa patients stained immunohistochemically for epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), followed by validation in a cohort of 310 primary tumors from 209 PCa patients. In order to investigate the gene expression differences between tumors with low and high TSR, we applied multigene expression analysis (nCounter^® PanCancer Progression Panel, NanoString) of 42 tissue samples. TSR scores were categorized into low (<1 TSR) and high (≥1 TSR). In the pilot cohort, 31 patients (43.1%) were categorized as low and 41 (56.9%) as high TSR score, whereas 48 (23.0%) patients from the validation cohort were classified as low TSR and 161 (77.0%) as high. In both cohorts, high TSR appeared to indicate the shorter time to biochemical recurrence in PCa patients (Log-rank test, p = 0.04 and p = 0.01 for the pilot and validation cohort, respectively). Additionally, in the multivariate analysis of the validation cohort, TSR predicted BR independent of other factors, i.e., pT, pN, and age (p = 0.04, HR 2.75, 95%CI 1.07–7.03). Our data revealed that tumors categorized into low and high TSR score show differential expression of various genes; the genes upregulated in tumors with low TSR score were mostly associated with extracellular matrix and cell adhesion regulation. Taken together, this study shows that high stroma content can play a protective role in PCa. Automatic EpCAM-based quantification of TSR might improve prognostication in personalized medicine for PCa. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

15 pages, 2992 KiB

Open AccessReview

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Meta-Analysis

by Ilias P. Nikas, Svenja Seide, Tanja Proctor, Zoi Kleinaki, Maria Kleinaki and Jordan P. Reynolds

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(2), 170; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020170 - 27 Jan 2022

Cited by 22 | Viewed by 11873

Abstract

The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. [...] Read more.

The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. This study aimed to calculate the pooled risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) of each category and demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology reported with TPS. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, while data were extracted and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled ROHM was 17.70% for the nondiagnostic category (95% CI, 0.0650; 0.3997), 13.04% for the NHGUC (95% CI, 0.0932; 0.1796), 38.65% for the AUC (95% CI, 0.3042; 0.4759), 12.45% for the LGUN (95% CI, 0.0431; 0.3101), 76.89 for the SHGUC (95% CI, 0.7063; 0.8216), and 91.79% for the HGUC and other malignancies (95% CI, 0.8722; 0.9482). A summary ROC curve was created and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.849, while the pooled sensitivity was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.589; 0.741) and false-positive rate was 0.101 (95% CI, 0.063; 0.158). In addition, the pooled DOR of the included studies was 21.258 (95% CI, 14.336; 31.522). TPS assigns each sample into a diagnostic category linked with a specific ROHM, guiding clinical management. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1776 KiB

Open AccessReview

The Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by Wojciech Krajewski, Łukasz Nowak, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Joanna Chorbińska, Paweł Kiełb, Adrian Poterek, Bartłomiej Sporniak, Michał Sut, Marco Moschini, Chiara Lonati, Roberto Carando, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Keiichiro Mori, Krzysztof Kaliszewski, Tomasz Szydełko and on behalf of the European Association of Urology–Young Academic Urologists (EAU–YAU) Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(12), 1363; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121363 - 14 Dec 2021

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2916

Abstract

Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for up to 10% of all urothelial neoplasms. Currently, various tumor-related factors are proposed to be of importance in UTUC prognostic models; however, the association of the primary UTUC location with oncological outcomes remains controversial. Thus, [...] Read more.

Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for up to 10% of all urothelial neoplasms. Currently, various tumor-related factors are proposed to be of importance in UTUC prognostic models; however, the association of the primary UTUC location with oncological outcomes remains controversial. Thus, we sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the latest available evidence and assess the impact of primary tumor location on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with UTUC undergoing radical nephroureterectomy. Materials and Methods: A computerized systematic literature search was conducted in October 2021 through the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Effect measures for the analyzed outcomes were reported hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among the total number of 16,836 UTUC in 17 included studies, 10,537 (62.6%) were renal pelvic tumors (RPTs), and 6299 (37.4%) were ureteral tumors (UTs). Pooled results indicated that patients with UT had significantly worse CSS (HR: 1.37, p < 0.001), OS (HR: 1.26, p = 0.003, and DFS (HR: 1.51, p < 0.001) compared to patients with RPT. Based on performed subgroup analyses, we identified different definitions of primary tumor location and geographical region as potential sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: Ureteral location of UTUC is associated with significantly worse long-term oncological outcomes. Our results support the need for close follow-up and the consideration of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with UTUC located in the ureter. However, further prospective studies are needed to draw final conclusions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 6956 KiB

Open AccessReview

Neoadjuvant Therapy Using Checkpoint Inhibitors before Radical Cystectomy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review

by Hadi SHSM, Usama A. Fahmy, Nabil A. Alhakamy, Mohd G. Khairul-Asri and Omar Fahmy

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(11), 1195; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111195 - 13 Nov 2021

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2421

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care before radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated as a neoadjuvant treatment after the reported efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Objectives: The aim of this systematic [...] Read more.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care before radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated as a neoadjuvant treatment after the reported efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the role of checkpoint inhibitors as a neoadjuvant treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer before radical cystectomy. Methods: Based on the PRISMA statement, a systematic review of the literature was conducted through online databases and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting Library. Suitable publications were subjected to full-text assessment. The primary outcome of this review was to identify the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on the oncological outcomes and survival benefits. Results: From the retrieved 254 results, 8 studies including 404 patients were included. Complete response varied between 30% and 50%. Downstaging varied between 50% and 74%. ≥Grade 3 AEs were recorded in 8.6% of patients who received monotherapy with either Atezolizumab or Pembrolizumab. In patients who received combination treatment, the incidence of ≥Grade 3 AEs was 16.3% for chemoimmunotherapy and 36.5% for combined immunotherapy. A total of 373 patients (92%) underwent radical cystectomy. ≥Grade 3 Clavien-Dindo surgical complications were reported in 21.7% of the patients. One-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) varied between 81% and 92%, and 70% and 88%, respectively. Conclusion: The evidence on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the setting of pre-radical cystectomy is quite limited, with noted variability within published trials. Combination with chemotherapy or another checkpoint inhibitor may boost response, although prospective studies with extended follow-up are needed to report on the survival advantages. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

14 pages, 4210 KiB

Open AccessSystematic Review

Oncological Response and Predictive Biomarkers for the Checkpoint Inhibitors in Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by Omar Fahmy, Nabil A. Alhakamy, Mohd G. Khairul-Asri, Osama A. A. Ahmed, Usama A. Fahmy, Claudia G. Fresta and Giuseppe Caruso

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010008 - 23 Dec 2021

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3560

Abstract

Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated in metastatic prostate cancer, however their overall effect is unclear and needs to be further investigated. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the oncological response of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients to immune [...] Read more.

Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated in metastatic prostate cancer, however their overall effect is unclear and needs to be further investigated. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the oncological response of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, a systematic review of the literature was conducted through online electronic databases and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting Library. Eligible publications were selected after a staged screening and selection process. RevMan 5.4 software was employed to run the quantitative analysis and forest plots. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for the randomized and non-randomized trials, respectively. Results: From the 831 results retrieved, 8 studies including 2768 patients were included. There was no significant effect on overall survival (OS) (overall response (OR) = 0.98; Z = 0.42; p = 0.67). Meanwhile, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better with immune checkpoint inhibitors administration (OR = 0.85; Z = 3.9; p < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis for oncological outcomes based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity status displayed no significant effect, except on prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA RR) (OR = 3.25; Z = 2.29; p = 0.02). Based on DNA damage repair (DDR), positive patients had a significantly better PFS and a trend towards better OS and overall response rate (ORR); the ORR was 40% in positive patients compared to 20% in the negative patients (OR = 2.46; Z = 1.3; p = 0.19), while PSA RR was 23.5% compared to 14.3% (OR = 1.88; Z = 0.88; p = 0.38). Better PFS was clearly associated with DDR positivity (OR = 0.70; Z = 2.48; p = 0.01) with a trend towards better OS in DDR positive patients (OR = 0.71; Z = 1.38; p = 0.17). Based on tumor mutation burden (TMB), ORR was 46.7% with high TMB versus 8.8% in patients with low TMB (OR = 11.88; Z = 3.0; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Checkpoint inhibitors provide modest oncological advantages in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. There are currently no good predictive indicators that indicate a greater response in some patients. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Precision Medicine in Urologic Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (9 papers)

Research

Review

Other

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI