materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Manufacturing and Recycling of Battery Materials

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Electronic Materials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2022) | Viewed by 18570

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Minerals and Materials Processing Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Taejon 305-350, Korea
Interests: metal extraction; separation of metal ions; purification of metal compounds; recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries; manufacturing of battery materials; leaching of metal compounds by deep eutectic solvents

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Demands for innovative battery materials are increasing in the market of IT mobile industry, electric vehicle, and energy storage systems, as interests in higher capacity and higher stability batteries increase in the era of the fourth industrial revolution and green energy.

To meet these demands, various next-generation batteries are currently being developed, such as all-solid-state, metal-air, redox-flow, lithium-sulfur, polyvalent ion, NaS, NaNi, and advanced capacitors. Moreover continuous and further research activities are needed to improve energy density, achieve low cost, and improve safety.

As electric vehicles are changed with internal combustion engine vehicles, the demand for cathode material, such as cobalt, nickel, and lithium are growing and the necessity for recycling of spent lithium-ion battery are rising. Effective spent battery recycling technology is very important for securing more amounts of battery materials, as well as solving the environmental problems due to the wrong disposal of spent battery. Even though there are some commercialized recycling processes for battery scraps and small-sized spent LIBs globally, economical, and eco-friendly recycling processes are not developed yet for large-scale spent LIBs used in EV and ESS.

This Special Issue will focus on the advances in manufacturing and recycling of battery materials for solving the bottlenecks in next-generation batteries and economical recycling process. Particularly, greater engagement with recycling will allow the battery manufacturing industry more chances to contribute to the circular economy.

It is my pleasure to invite you to submit to this Special Issue. Full papers, communications, and reviews are welcome.

Dr. Jeong-Soo Sohn
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • manufacturing battery materials
  • recycling of large scale spent LIBs
  • all solid state battery
  • metal-air battery
  • vanadium redox flow battery
  • lithium-sulfur battery
  • NaS, NaNi
  • advanced pyrometallurgical/hydrometallurgical recycling process
  • application of deep eutectic solvent for ecofriendly leaching
  • re-use, direct reutilization of spent LIBs
  • recycling of ESS and FCEV

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

30 pages, 7228 KiB  
Article
Studies of Selective Recovery of Zinc and Manganese from Alkaline Batteries Scrap by Leaching and Precipitation
by Tomasz Skrzekut, Andrzej Piotrowicz, Piotr Noga, Maciej Wędrychowicz and Adam W. Bydałek
Materials 2022, 15(11), 3966; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113966 - 2 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2457
Abstract
Recovery of zinc and manganese from scrapped alkaline batteries were carried out in the following way: leaching in H2SO4 and selective precipitation of zinc and manganese by alkalization/neutralization. As a result of non-selective leaching, 95.6–99.7% Zn was leached and 83.7–99.3% [...] Read more.
Recovery of zinc and manganese from scrapped alkaline batteries were carried out in the following way: leaching in H2SO4 and selective precipitation of zinc and manganese by alkalization/neutralization. As a result of non-selective leaching, 95.6–99.7% Zn was leached and 83.7–99.3% Mn was leached. A critical technological parameter is the liquid/solid treatment (l/s) ratio, which should be at least 20 mL∙g−1. Selective leaching, which allows the leaching of zinc only, takes place with a leaching yield of 84.8–98.5% Zn, with minimal manganese co-leaching, 0.7–12.3%. The optimal H2SO4 concentration is 0.25 mol∙L−1. Precipitation of zinc and manganese from the solution after non-selective leaching, with the use of NaOH at pH = 13, and then with H2SO4 to pH = 9, turned out to be ineffective: the manganese concentrate contained 19.9 wt.% Zn and zinc concentrate, and 21.46 wt.% Mn. Better selectivity results were obtained if zinc was precipitated from the solution after selective leaching: at pH = 6.5, 90% of Zn precipitated, and only 2% manganese. Moreover, the obtained concentrate contained over 90% of ZnO. The precipitation of zinc with sodium phosphate and sodium carbonate is non-selective, despite its relatively high efficiency: up to 93.70% of Zn and 4.48–93.18% of Mn and up to 95.22% of Zn and 19.55–99.71% Mn, respectively for Na3PO4 and Na2CO3. Recovered zinc and manganese compounds could have commercial values with suitable refining processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Manufacturing and Recycling of Battery Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2736 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Excessive Sulfate in the Li-Ion Battery Leachate on the Properties of Resynthesized Li[Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3]O2
by Jimin Lee, Sanghyuk Park, Mincheol Beak, Sang Ryul Park, Ah Reum Lee, Suk Hyun Byun, Junho Song, Jeong Soo Sohn and Kyungjung Kwon
Materials 2021, 14(21), 6672; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216672 - 5 Nov 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2513
Abstract
In order to examine the effect of excessive sulfate in the leachate of spent Li-ion batteries (LIBs), LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (pristine NCM) and sulfate-containing LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (NCMS) are prepared by a co-precipitation [...] Read more.
In order to examine the effect of excessive sulfate in the leachate of spent Li-ion batteries (LIBs), LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (pristine NCM) and sulfate-containing LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (NCMS) are prepared by a co-precipitation method. The crystal structures, morphology, surface species, and electrochemical performances of both cathode active materials are studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and charge-discharge tests. The XRD patterns and XPS results identify the presence of sulfate groups on the surface of NCMS. While pristine NCM exhibits a very dense surface in SEM images, NCMS has a relatively porous surface, which could be attributed to the sulfate impurities that hinder the growth of primary particles. The charge-discharge tests show that discharge capacities of NCMS at C-rates, which range from 0.1 to 5 C, are slightly decreased compared to pristine NCM. In dQ/dV plots, pristine NCM and NCMS have the same redox overvoltage regardless of discharge C-rates. The omnipresent sulfate due to the sulfuric acid leaching of spent LIBs has a minimal effect on resynthesized NCM cathode active materials as long as their precursors are adequately washed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Manufacturing and Recycling of Battery Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 5013 KiB  
Article
Utilizing the Intrinsic Thermal Instability of Swedenborgite Structured YBaCo4O7+δ as an Opportunity for Material Engineering in Lithium-Ion Batteries by Er and Ga Co-Doping Processes
by Sanghyuk Park, Kwangho Park, Ji-Seop Shin, Gyeongbin Ko, Wooseok Kim, Jun-Young Park and Kyungjung Kwon
Materials 2021, 14(16), 4565; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164565 - 14 Aug 2021
Viewed by 2225
Abstract
We firstly introduce Er and Ga co-doped swedenborgite-structured YBaCo4O7+δ (YBC) as a cathode-active material in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), aiming at converting the phase instability of YBC at high temperatures into a strategic way of enhancing the structural stability of layered [...] Read more.
We firstly introduce Er and Ga co-doped swedenborgite-structured YBaCo4O7+δ (YBC) as a cathode-active material in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), aiming at converting the phase instability of YBC at high temperatures into a strategic way of enhancing the structural stability of layered cathode-active materials. Our recent publication reported that Y0.8Er0.2BaCo3.2Ga0.8O7+δ (YEBCG) showed excellent phase stability compared to YBC in a fuel cell operating condition. By contrast, the feasibility of the LiCoO2 (LCO) phase, which is derived from swedenborgite-structured YBC-based materials, as a LIB cathode-active material is investigated and the effects of co-doping with the Er and Ga ions on the structural and electrochemical properties of Li-intercalated YBC are systemically studied. The intrinsic swedenborgite structure of YBC-based materials with tetrahedrally coordinated Co2+/Co3+ are partially transformed into octahedrally coordinated Co3+, resulting in the formation of an LCO layered structure with a space group of R-3m that can work as a Li-ion migration path. Li-intercalated YEBCG (Li[YEBCG]) shows effective suppression of structural phase transition during cycling, leading to the enhancement of LIB performance in Coulombic efficiency, capacity retention, and rate capability. The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy are performed to elucidate the enhanced phase stability of Li[YEBCG]. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Manufacturing and Recycling of Battery Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 12191 KiB  
Article
Effect of Residual Trace Amounts of Fe and Al in Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2 Cathode Active Material for the Sustainable Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries
by Seongdeock Jeong, Sanghyuk Park, Mincheol Beak, Jangho Park, Jeong-Soo Sohn and Kyungjung Kwon
Materials 2021, 14(9), 2464; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092464 - 10 May 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4056
Abstract
As the explosive growth of the electric vehicle market leads to an increase in spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the disposal of LIBs has also made headlines. In this study, we synthesized the cathode active materials Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2 [...] Read more.
As the explosive growth of the electric vehicle market leads to an increase in spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the disposal of LIBs has also made headlines. In this study, we synthesized the cathode active materials Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2 (NMC) and Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3Fe0.0005Al0.0005]O2 (NMCFA) via hydroxide co-precipitation and calcination processes, which simulate the resynthesis of NMC in leachate containing trace amounts of iron and aluminum from spent LIBs. The effects of iron and aluminum on the physicochemical and electrochemical properties were investigated and compared with NMC. Trace amounts of iron and aluminum do not affect the morphology, the formation of O3-type layered structures, or the redox peak. On the other hand, the rate capability of NMCFA shows high discharge capacities at 7 C (110 mAh g−1) and 10 C (74 mAh g−1), comparable to the values for NMC at 5 C (111 mAh g−1) and 7 C (79 mAh g−1), respectively, due to the widened interslab thickness of NMCFA which facilitates the movement of lithium ions in a 2D channel. Therefore, iron and aluminum, which are usually considered as impurities in the recycling of LIBs, could be used as doping elements for enhancing the electrochemical performance of resynthesized cathode active materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Manufacturing and Recycling of Battery Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

41 pages, 7300 KiB  
Review
Metallic Material Selection and Prospective Surface Treatments for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Bipolar Plates—A Review
by Tereza Bohackova, Jakub Ludvik and Milan Kouril
Materials 2021, 14(10), 2682; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102682 - 20 May 2021
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 6183
Abstract
The aim of this review is to summarize the possibilities of replacing graphite bipolar plates in fuel-cells. The review is mostly focused on metallic bipolar plates, which benefit from many properties required for fuel cells, viz. good mechanical properties, thermal and electrical conductivity, [...] Read more.
The aim of this review is to summarize the possibilities of replacing graphite bipolar plates in fuel-cells. The review is mostly focused on metallic bipolar plates, which benefit from many properties required for fuel cells, viz. good mechanical properties, thermal and electrical conductivity, availability, and others. The main disadvantage of metals is that their corrosion resistance in the fuel-cell environment originates from the formation of a passive layer, which significantly increases interfacial contact resistance. Suitable coating systems prepared by a proper deposition method are eventually able to compensate for this disadvantage and make the replacement of graphite bipolar plates possible. This review compares coatings, materials, and deposition methods based on electrochemical measurements and contact resistance properties with respect to achieving appropriate parameters established by the DOE as objectives for 2020. An extraordinary number of studies have been performed, but only a minority of them provided promising results. One of these is the nanocrystalline β-Nb2N coating on AISI 430, prepared by the disproportionation reaction of Nb(IV) in molten salt, which satisfied the DOE 2020 objectives in terms of corrosion resistance and interfacial contact resistance. From other studies, TiN, CrN, NbC, TiC, or amorphous carbon-based coatings seem to be promising. This paper is novel in extracting important aspects for future studies and methods for testing the properties of metallic materials and factors affecting monitoring characteristics and parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Manufacturing and Recycling of Battery Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop