Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2023) | Viewed by 27830

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall-und Handchirurgie, Maria-Josef-Hospital Greven, Greven, Germany
Interests: arthroplasty; knee surgery; biomechanics; classification surgery; fracture; trauma; sports injuries; trauma surgery; hip

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Interests: cartilage; knee surgery; knee injuries; arthroplasty; fracture hip; sports injuries; trauma surgery; osteoporosis; knee

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trierweiler, Germany
Interests: knee; arthroplasty; bone; hip; sports injuries; fracture; knee surgery; knee injuries; osteoporosis; knee arthroplasty

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Hip and knee arthroplasties are two of the most frequent operations carried out in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. In the last decade, robot-assisted surgeries have seen a comeback in joint replacement of the hips and knees, alongside advances in patient-specific instruments and implants and improved materials. Novel technologies, including 3D printing and digital advancements such as augmented reality and artificial intelligence, promise better preoperative surgery planning and enhanced intraoperative performances.

This Special Issue will provide a comprehensive overview on the latest trends and developments in hip and knee arthroplasty technology.

Dr. Clemens Kösters
Dr. Sebastian Metzlaff
Prof. Dr. Ralf Dieckmann
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • knee arthroplasty
  • hip arthroplasty
  • robot-assisted arthroplasty
  • patient-specific implants
  • augmented reality
  • 3D printing

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (12 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

11 pages, 1890 KiB  
Article
The Modified Harrington Procedure for Metastatic Peri-Acetabular Bone Lesion Using a Novel Highly Porous Titanium Revision Shell with Long Lever Arm Screw
by Sven Frieler, Carsten Gebert, Yannik Hanusrichter, Periklis Godolias and Martin Wessling
Medicina 2024, 60(7), 1047; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071047 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1330
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Peri-acetabular metastases often lead to significant pain and functional impairment. Surgical interventions, including the Harrington procedure, aim to address these challenges. This study evaluates a modified Harrington procedure using the MUTARS® PRS® (Pelvic Revision Shell) with an [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Peri-acetabular metastases often lead to significant pain and functional impairment. Surgical interventions, including the Harrington procedure, aim to address these challenges. This study evaluates a modified Harrington procedure using the MUTARS® PRS® (Pelvic Revision Shell) with an 8 mm fixation screw for severe acetabular defects resulting from metastatic lesions. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 12 patients treated between January 2020 and December 2023 was conducted. The procedure involved using the novel MUTARS® PRS® with an 8 mm in diameter dome screw (length 70–100 mm). Outcome measures included implant positioning changes, complication rates, functional outcomes, implant longevity, and patient survival. Radiological assessments were performed postoperatively, with follow-ups at 3, 6, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Results: Average follow-up was 15 ± 11 months, with 67% patient survival at 1 year and 44% at 2 years. Implant survivorship remained 100%. Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 37 ± 22 preoperatively to 75 ± 15 at the last follow-up. No revisions involving implant components were reported. Complications occurred in 5 of 12 patients. Overall, PRS® demonstrates effective osseous ingrowth, high primary stability, immediate full weight-bearing, and low complication rates. Conclusions: PRS® integrates facilitating osseous ingrowth for preferable long-term outcomes, while efficiently transmitting the weight-bearing load to the intact aspect of the pelvis using a long 8 mm lever screw, enhancing the primary stability of the construct. It proves to be an effective and reproducible technique for managing destructive metastatic lesions of the acetabulum and peri-acetabular region, even in irradiated bone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1371 KiB  
Article
Optimization of the “Perth CT” Protocol for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
by Milica Stojadinović, Dragan Mašulović, Marko Kadija, Darko Milovanović, Nataša Milić, Ksenija Marković and Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac
Medicina 2024, 60(1), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010098 - 5 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2187
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the treatment of choice for advanced osteoarthritis. The aim of this paper was to show the possibilities of optimizing the Perth CT protocol, which is highly effective for preoperative planning and postoperative assessment [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the treatment of choice for advanced osteoarthritis. The aim of this paper was to show the possibilities of optimizing the Perth CT protocol, which is highly effective for preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of alignment. Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study comprised 16 patients for preoperative planning or postoperative evaluation of TKA. All patients were examined with the standard and optimized Perth CT protocol using advance techniques, including automatic exposure control (AEC), iterative image reconstruction (IR), as well as a single-energy projection-based metal artifact reduction algorithm for eliminating prosthesis artifacts. The effective radiation dose (E) was determined based on the dose report. Imaging quality is determined according to subjective and objective (values of signal to noise ratio (SdNR) and figure of merit (FOM)) criteria. Results: The effective radiation dose with the optimized protocol was significantly lower compared to the standard protocol (p < 0.001), while in patients with the knee prosthesis, E increased significantly less with the optimized protocol compared to the standard protocol. No significant difference was observed in the subjective evaluation of image quality between protocols (p > 0.05). Analyzing the objective criteria for image quality optimized protocols resulted in lower SdNR values and higher FOM values. No significant difference of image quality was determined using the SdNR and FOM as per the specified protocols and parts of extremities, and for the presence of prothesis. Conclusions: Retrospecting the ALARA (‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’) principles, it is possible to optimize the Perth CT protocol by reducing the kV and mAs values and by changing the collimation and increasing the pitch factor. Advanced IR techniques were used in both protocols, and AEC was used in the optimized protocol. The effective dose of radiation can be reduced five times, and the image quality will be satisfactory. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1790 KiB  
Article
Early- to Mid-Term Review of a Prospective, Multi-Center, International, Outcomes Study of an Anatomically Designed Implant with Posterior-Stabilized Bearing in Total Knee Arthroplasty
by Sung Eun Kim, Du Hyun Ro, Myung Chul Lee and Jason M. Cholewa
Medicina 2023, 59(12), 2105; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122105 - 30 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1268
Abstract
Background and Objectives: National joint registries report higher total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision rates in posterior-stabilized (PS) systems compared to non-posterior-stabilized designs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of an anatomic implant with a PS [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: National joint registries report higher total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision rates in posterior-stabilized (PS) systems compared to non-posterior-stabilized designs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of an anatomic implant with a PS bearing. Materials and Methods: An early- to mid-term follow-up of a prospective, multi-center, non-controlled outcomes study of patients who received primary TKA between November 2014 and June 2017 was performed. A total of 800 cases using PS bearings that were implanted in 664 patients were monitored post-operatively for their implant survivorship and adverse events for up to five years. The Knee Society Knee and Function scores, patient satisfaction, the five-dimensional European Quality of Life questionnaire, and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at six weeks, six months, one year, two years, three years, and five years. Results: The mean follow-up period was 3.7 ± 1.3 years, and the three-year implant survival rate was 99.3% (95% CI: 98.4%, 99.7%) with five revisions during the five-year follow-up. Patient satisfaction was 96.1% at six weeks and increased to 99.3% at one year. All patient-reported outcome measures significantly (p < 0.0001) increased up to the one-year follow-up and then remained stable up to the five-year follow-up. Conclusions: This study supports the excellent survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of the Persona® Knee system using cemented, fixed bearing, posterior-stabilized components with minimal complications at early- to mid-term follow-up in an international Asian population. Ongoing observations are being performed to investigate the mid- to long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes associated with this knee system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1146 KiB  
Article
Modified Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Surgery (ALMIS) for Total Hip Replacement: Anatomical Considerations, Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes
by Christos Koutserimpas, Maria Piagkou, Ilias Karaiskos, Athanasios Karamitros, Konstantinos Raptis, Konstantinos Kourelis and Nikolaos Christodoulou
Medicina 2023, 59(9), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091520 - 23 Aug 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2054
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In the modified anterolateral minimally invasive surgery (ALMIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA), the intermuscular plane between the tensor fasciae latae and the gluteus maximus (GM) is exposed, while the anterior ¼ of the GM is detached. There are scarce [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: In the modified anterolateral minimally invasive surgery (ALMIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA), the intermuscular plane between the tensor fasciae latae and the gluteus maximus (GM) is exposed, while the anterior ¼ of the GM is detached. There are scarce data regarding this surgical approach. The purpose of the present study is to thoroughly describe this approach, encompassing the anatomical background, and to present the results of a retrospective two-center study of 603 patients. Materials and Methods: The present study includes a two-center retrospective observational cohort of 603 patients undergoing the ALMIS technique with minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographics were recorded, while range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated preoperatively, at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up (>5 years). Surgery-related complications were also recorded. Results: The studied population’s mean age was 69.4 years, while most of them were females (397; 65.8%). The mean follow-up was 6.9 years. The median HHS at the 1-month follow-up was 74, compared to the 47 preoperatively (p-value < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, median HHS was 94. At the 1-month follow-up, mean adduction was 19.9° (compared to 15.4° preoperatively; p < 0.0001), mean abduction 24.3° (18.2° preoperatively; p < 0.0001), mean flexion 107.8° (79.1° preoperatively; p < 0.0001), mean external rotation 20.1° (12.1° preoperatively; p < 0.0001) and mean internal rotation 15.3° (7.2° preoperatively; p < 0.0001). ROM further improved until the final follow-up; mean adduction reached 22°, mean abduction 27.1°, mean flexion 119.8°, mean external rotation 24.4° and mean internal rotation 19.7°. Regarding complications, 1.3% of the sample suffered anterior traumatic dislocation, in 1.8% an intraoperative femoral fracture occurred, while 1.2% suffered periprosthetic joint infection. Conclusions: The modified ALMIS technique exhibited excellent clinical outcomes at short-, mid- and long-term follow-up, by significantly improving hip ROM and the HHS. Careful utilization of this technique, after adequate training, should yield favorable outcomes, while minimal major complications should be expected. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3361 KiB  
Article
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring with a Metal Augment: A Minimum Eight-Year Follow-Up Study
by Han Soul Kim, Ji Wan Kim, Jae Suk Chang and Chul-Ho Kim
Medicina 2023, 59(6), 1036; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061036 - 27 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2371
Abstract
Background and Objectives: An acetabular reinforcement ring (ARR) with a structural allograft is conventionally used to treat large acetabular bone defects or discontinuity during revision hip arthroplasty. However, ARR is prone to failure due to bone resorption and lack of incorporation. Here, we [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: An acetabular reinforcement ring (ARR) with a structural allograft is conventionally used to treat large acetabular bone defects or discontinuity during revision hip arthroplasty. However, ARR is prone to failure due to bone resorption and lack of incorporation. Here, we investigated the surgical outcomes of the patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using ARR combined with a metal augment (MA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 consecutive patients who had a minimum 8-year follow-up after revision hip arthroplasty using ARR with MA in Paprosky type III acetabular defect. We collected patient demographics, surgical details, clinical scores (including Harris Hip Score (HHS)), postoperative complications, and 8-year survival rates. Results: Six male and four female patients were included. The mean age was 64.3 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 104.3 months (96.0–112.0 months). Trauma-related diagnosis was the most common reason for index surgery. Three patients underwent all component revision, and seven underwent cup revision. Six were confirmed as Paprosky type IIIA and four as type IIIB. The mean HHS at the final follow-up was 81.5 (72–91). One patient was diagnosed with prosthetic joint infection at the 3-month follow-up; therefore, the minimum 8-year survival rate with our technique was 90.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.3–118.5%). Conclusions: The satisfactory mid- to long-term results of revision THA suggest that ARR combined with tantalum MA is a viable revision option for treating severe acetabular defects with pelvic discontinuity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1535 KiB  
Article
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty with DELTA ST-C Cup and MINIMA S Stem
by Nikolaos Christodoulou, Emmanouil Volonakis, Karatzas Voutsas, Konstantinos Raptis and Christos Koutserimpas
Medicina 2023, 59(3), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030607 - 19 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2618
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The uncemented threaded DELTA ST-C cup was introduced in last few years. It has a hemispheric shell, consisting of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. The MINIMA S stem was developed according to the principles of proximal-loading and extended metaphyseal geometry applied [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The uncemented threaded DELTA ST-C cup was introduced in last few years. It has a hemispheric shell, consisting of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. The MINIMA S stem was developed according to the principles of proximal-loading and extended metaphyseal geometry applied to a short stem. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and the short- and mid-term survivorship of the DELTA ST-C cup and MINIMA S stem in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The present is the first study to report outcomes and implant survivorship of the DELTA ST-C cup coupled with the MINIMA S femoral stem. Materials and Methods: The present study is a retrospective observational cohort study of a prospectively maintained database, evaluating clinical outcomes and implant survivorship in 95 patients undergoing THA with the MINIMA stem coupled with the DELTA ST-C cup with at least a 3-year follow-up. The clinical evaluation was assessed with a change in the Harris hip score (HHS), while the radiographic evaluation included anteroposterior views of the pelvis and lateral views of the affected hip. Results: The enrolled population’s mean age was 69.3 years and most patients were female (64%). The MINIMA S standard stem was implanted in 68 patients (72%), the lateralized stem was implanted in 27 (28%), and the mean acetabular inclination was 48.2°. The HHS improved significantly from the preoperative value (median 46, IQR: 38–55), already at 1 month after surgery (median 76, IQR: 66–77), reaching excellent results at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively (median 96, IQR: 91–100). X-rays demonstrated good implant stability and biomechanics parameter restorations revealed no sign of subsidence, and the presence of radiolucent lines greater than 2 mm in the short stem area in five cases and in the acetabulum in one were not clinically significant. No revisions have been performed so far. Conclusions: The MINIMA S stem coupled with the DELTA ST-C cup demonstrated very good clinical and radiological results with a significant increase of the Harris hip score at short- and mid-term follow-up. This is the first study evaluating the DELTA ST-C cup, showing promising outcomes during the study’s follow-up. The MINIMA S stem has been evaluated in a very few studies. However, the combination with this particular cup had not yet been studied. The design of the stem and the cup ensures primary stability and excellent early term outcomes, moreover the study demonstrates extraordinary implant survivorship, equal to 100%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1109 KiB  
Article
Dual-Modular Versus Single-Modular Stems for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Survival Analysis
by Samo K. Fokter, Nejc Noč, Vesna Levašič, Marko Hanc and Jan Zajc
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020290 - 2 Feb 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3173
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Increased revision rate of dual-modular (DM) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of modular-neck breakage and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) to additional junction damage products is well established and some designs have been recalled from [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Increased revision rate of dual-modular (DM) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of modular-neck breakage and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) to additional junction damage products is well established and some designs have been recalled from the market. However, some long-term studies of specific DM stems did not confirm the inferiority of these stems compared to standard single-modular (SM) stems, and a head-to-head comparison THA is missing. The objectives of this multicentre study were to determine the survivorship and complication rates of a common DM stem design compared to a similar SM stem. Materials and Methods: In a time frame from January 2012 to November 2015, a cohort of 807 patients (882 hips) consecutively underwent primary cementless THAs at two orthopaedic centres. 377 hips were treated with a Zweimüller-type DM stem THA system and 505 hips with a similar SM stem THA system, both including a modern press-fit acetabulum. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and complication rates were compared between both groups in a median follow-up of 9.0 years (maximum, 9.9 years). Results: The 9-year survivorship of the DM stem THA system (92.6%, 95% CI 89.9–95.3) was significantly lower than that of the SM stem THA system (97.0%, 95% CI 95.2–98.8). There were no differences in revision rates for septic loosening, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures between the two groups. One ceramic inlay and one Ti-alloy modular neck breakage occurred in the DM stem THA system group, but the main reason for revision in this group was aseptic loosening of components. Conclusions: The survivorship of the DM stem THA system was lower than the similar SM stem THA system in a comparable clinical environment with long-term follow-up. Our results confirmed that no rationale for stem modularity exists in primary THAs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

11 pages, 285 KiB  
Review
Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses
by Christoph Theil, Sebastian Bockholt, Georg Gosheger, Ralf Dieckmann, Jan Schwarze, Martin Schulze, Jan Puetzler and Burkhard Moellenbeck
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 583; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040583 - 31 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1483
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection is a feared complication after the megaprosthetic reconstruction of oncologic and non-oncologic bone defects of including the knee or hip joint. Due to the relative rarity of these procedures, however, optimal management is debatable. Considering the expanding use of megaprostheses [...] Read more.
Periprosthetic joint infection is a feared complication after the megaprosthetic reconstruction of oncologic and non-oncologic bone defects of including the knee or hip joint. Due to the relative rarity of these procedures, however, optimal management is debatable. Considering the expanding use of megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty and the high revision burden in orthopedic oncology, the risk of PJI is likely to increase over the coming years. In this non-systematic review article, we present and discuss current management options and the associated results focusing on studies from the last 15 years and studies from dedicated centers or study groups. The indication, surgical details and results in controlling infection are presented for debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and retention (DAIR) procedure with an exchange of the modular components, single-stage implant exchange, two-stage exchanges and ablative procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
14 pages, 2339 KiB  
Review
Achieving Precise Cup Positioning in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review
by Laura Elisa Streck and Friedrich Boettner
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020271 - 31 Jan 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3066
Abstract
Malpositioned implants in total hip arthroplasty are associated with impingement, increased wear, and dislocations, thus precise cup positioning is crucial. However, significant deviations between targeted and actually achieved cup positions have been found even in patients operated by experienced surgeons. When aiming for [...] Read more.
Malpositioned implants in total hip arthroplasty are associated with impingement, increased wear, and dislocations, thus precise cup positioning is crucial. However, significant deviations between targeted and actually achieved cup positions have been found even in patients operated by experienced surgeons. When aiming for higher accuracy, various methods based on freehand positioning lead by anatomic landmarks, C-arm fluoroscopy, imageless navigation, or robotic-assisted-surgery have been described. There is a constant development of new products aiming to simplify and improve intraoperative guidance. Both the literature and expert opinions on this topic are often quite controversial. This article aims to give an overview of the different methods and systems with their specific advantages and potential pitfalls while also taking a look into the future of cup positioning in anterior hip replacements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

9 pages, 2971 KiB  
Commentary
Pitfalls with the MAKO Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
by Konstantinos Dretakis and Christos Koutserimpas
Medicina 2024, 60(2), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020262 - 2 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2172
Abstract
Robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) with the MAKO system minimizes deviations in implant alignment and yields superior precision in implant position compared to a manual total knee arthroplasty. In this comprehensive commentary, we present and categorize the limitations and pitfalls of the procedure [...] Read more.
Robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) with the MAKO system minimizes deviations in implant alignment and yields superior precision in implant position compared to a manual total knee arthroplasty. In this comprehensive commentary, we present and categorize the limitations and pitfalls of the procedure and we also provide recommendations for avoiding each limitation. The main surgeon-related limitations include prolonged operation duration, loose insertion of the checkpoints and pins, wrong registration and mapping, and damage to soft tissues during bone cutting. The system-related issues include the interruptions of the saw-cutting due to vibrations, specifications for the operating room floor and power supply, the high cost of the system, as well as the cost of each operation due to the extra implants, inability to use the system with various prostheses, wireless connection interruptions between the system’s components, and hardware issues with the six joints of the robotic device. In order to circumvent the potential challenges in this surgical procedure, it is essential to possess sufficient experience and undergo comprehensive training. Maintaining continuous awareness of the additional implants throughout the entire operation and prioritizing the preservation of soft tissues are of paramount significance. A profound comprehension of the system and its inherent constraints can also prove to be pivotal in certain situations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2801 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis
by Jae Suk Chang, Min Wook Kang, Dong Hwan Lee, Ji Wan Kim and Chul-Ho Kim
Medicina 2023, 59(8), 1390; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081390 - 29 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2307
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach, which utilizes the interval between the tensor fasciae latae posteriorly, offers several advantages, such as the reduced risk of nerve injury and the freedom to choose various implants. Herein, we aimed to compare the [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach, which utilizes the interval between the tensor fasciae latae posteriorly, offers several advantages, such as the reduced risk of nerve injury and the freedom to choose various implants. Herein, we aimed to compare the outcome of ABMS to the direct anterior (DA) approach using pairwise meta-analysis techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PUBMED), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed for studies published up to 7 June 2023, which compared the ABMS approach with the DA approach for hip arthroplasty. We compared (1) perioperative outcomes (operation time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total opioid consumption, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the number of patients discharged to their homes); (2) postoperative complications (neuropraxia/nerve injury, dislocation, surgical site infection, intraoperative fracture, and reoperation rate); and (3) implant position (cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem alignment). Results: Ten studies were eligible for meta-analysis, including 1737 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with the ABMS approach and 1979 with the DA approach. The pooled analysis showed no differences in all outcome variables, including perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and the implant position between the two surgical approaches. Conclusions: In current meta-analysis, the ABMS approach demonstrated comparable results to the conventional DA approach in terms of both clinical and radiologic outcomes as well as postoperative complications. Furthermore, the ABMS approach has the advantage of a broader indication and fewer limitations in terms of the surgical position compared to the DA approach. Therefore, the ABMS approach can be even more beneficial as an option within MSA, surpassing the utility of the DA approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 1906 KiB  
Case Report
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Utilizing Threaded Pins in Cement for Tibial Bone Loss
by Max Jiganti and Nicholas Tedesco
Medicina 2023, 59(1), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010162 - 13 Jan 2023
Viewed by 2778
Abstract
Introduction: a primary goal in revision total knee arthroplasty is to recreate and restore near-normal knee biomechanics by reapproximating the native anatomy. Tibial bone loss poses a challenge for surgeons. Bone cement, bone allograft, screws-in-cement, metaphyseal sleeves or cones, and metallic augments [...] Read more.
Introduction: a primary goal in revision total knee arthroplasty is to recreate and restore near-normal knee biomechanics by reapproximating the native anatomy. Tibial bone loss poses a challenge for surgeons. Bone cement, bone allograft, screws-in-cement, metaphyseal sleeves or cones, and metallic augments are some options for addressing bony deficiency, with endoprosthetic proximal tibia replacement a consideration for the most severe cases. Case Description: we present a case for the novel use of threaded Steinmann pins augmented with cement to reconstruct a massive tibial metaphyseal cortical defect during revision knee arthroplasty. A 76-year-old male presented with an infected primary total knee arthroplasty using MSIS (Musculoskeletal Infection Society) criteria and underwent a standard two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty once the knee was confirmed sterile. Intraoperatively, significant posteromedial and metaphyseal tibial bone loss was identified. In order to avoid proximal tibial replacement and the extensor mechanism complications seen with these, coupled with obligate gastrocnemius flap, a metaphyseal cone was utilized in the proximal tibia with four vertical threaded Steinmann pins spaced approximately 1 cm apart at its periphery, subsequently cut flush with the level of the cone after cementation to recreate the tibial cortex. The patient’s function and range of motion continue to improve with no evidence of structural complication at 2.5 years of follow-up. Discussion: the implementation of threaded Steinmann pins was utilized in this case to stabilize a cemented metaphyseal cone in the revision of an infected total knee with significant tibial bone loss. The threaded property may help prevent migration of these pins in comparison to smooth pins. Creation of a stable platform in a revision total knee arthroplasty poses a substantial challenge in the context of significant bone loss, and our case depicts a good short-term outcome and another option for surgeons to consider before moving toward endoprostheses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Developments in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop