Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 February 2022) | Viewed by 33139

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
Interests: endoscopy; interventional EUS; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; biliary tract diseases; pancreatic diseases; EUS; cholangiocarcinoma
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Background and history of this topic: in recent years, ERCP and EUS connections have become more and more intense and now the two procedures are considered complementary, supporting the concept of “Biliopancreatic Endoscopy”. The advent of new technologies, instruments and devices has led us to face new indications and new questions.

Aim and scope of the Special Issue: this Special Issue is designed to deal with different aspects of the Biliopancreatic Endoscopy with special interest on recent advances in indications, techniques, and clinical and logistic implications.

Cutting-edge research: interventional EUS, EUS guided drainage, ERCP, and cholangioscopy.

What kind of papers we are soliciting: reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, case reports, research papers.

Dr. Andrea Anderloni
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • EUS
  • Interventional EUS
  • ERCP
  • Cholangioscopy
  • Biliopancreatic endoscopy
  • CH-EUS
  • FNB
  • RFA
  • Difficult biliary stones
  • Lithotripsy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

3 pages, 233 KiB  
Editorial
Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy
by Andrea Anderloni and Kareem Khalaf
Medicina 2022, 58(5), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050593 - 26 Apr 2022
Viewed by 1680
Abstract
In this Special Issue of Medicina entitled “Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy” in the Section “Gastroenterology & Hepatology”, nine articles pave new insights into the advances in the world of biliopancreatic endoscopy [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

12 pages, 9181 KiB  
Article
Perceived Feasibility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenteric Anastomosis: An Italian Survey
by Ilaria Tarantino, Emanuele Sinagra, Cecilia Binda, Alessandro Fugazza, Arnaldo Amato, Marcello Maida, Andrea Lisotti, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Giovanni Aragona, Carlo Fabbri, Andrea Anderloni and on behalf of the i-EUS Group
Medicina 2022, 58(4), 532; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040532 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2341
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenteric anastomosis (EUS-GEA) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery across several indications. The aim of this survey is to investigate the perceived feasibility of this technique nationwide, within a [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenteric anastomosis (EUS-GEA) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery across several indications. The aim of this survey is to investigate the perceived feasibility of this technique nationwide, within a working group skilled in interventional endosonography. Materials and Methods: Endoscopists were asked to answer to 49 items on a web-based questionnaire about expertise, peri- and intra-procedural aspects in the three main settings of EUS-GEA performance, budget/refund, and future perspectives. Statistical analysis was performed through SPSS® (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: Sixty endosonographers belonging to forty Italian centers were I-EUS app users and were all invited to participate. In total, 29 participants from 24 Italian centers completed the survey. All the participants were endosonographers with a broad range of experience both in the field of EUS (only 10.3% with more than 20 years of experience) and duodenal stenting (only 6.9% placed more than 10 stents in 2020), whereas 86.2% also performed ERCP. A total of 27.6% of participants performed EUS-GEA (3.4% more than 20 during their career); on the other hand, 79.3% of participants routinely performed drainage of peri-pancreatic fluid collections, 62.1% performed biliary drainage, and 62.1% performed gallbladder drainage with LAMS. A total of 89.7% of participants thought that EUS-GEA could be useful in their daily clinical practice, with 100% concluding that this procedure will need to be performed in referral centers in the near future; however, in 55.2% of cases, organizational obstacles may occur and affect the diffusion of the procedure. With regard to indications: 44.8% of participants performed the procedure with palliative intent for malignant indication (96.6% pancreatic adenocarcinoma), and 13.6% also for benign indication. A total of 20.7% of participants experienced adverse events (none severe or fatal, 66.6% moderate). A total of 62.1% of participants considered the procedure technically challenging, although 82.8% considered the risk of adverse events acceptable when considering the benefit. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first survey assessing the perceived feasibility of EUS-guided anastomoses after its advent. There are currently wide variations in practice nationwide, which demonstrate a need to define technical, qualitative, and peri-procedural requirements to carry out this procedure. Therefore, a standardization of these requirements is needed in order to overcome the technical, economical, and organizational obstacles relative to its diffusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 466 KiB  
Article
The Yield of String Sign in Differentiating Mucinous from Non-Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
by Wisam Sbeit, Anas Kadah, Amir Shahin and Tawfik Khoury
Medicina 2021, 57(7), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57070716 - 15 Jul 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2046
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of pancreatic cysts is mostly based on a combination of morphological appearance and fluid analysis of amylase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). We aimed to assess the capability of the string sign in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of pancreatic cysts is mostly based on a combination of morphological appearance and fluid analysis of amylase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). We aimed to assess the capability of the string sign in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cysts. Materials and Methods: All patients who were referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for pancreatic cysts assessment from 2015 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Our cohort consisted of 112 patients. Of them, 92 patients (82.1%) had mucinous cystic neoplasms (group A) and 20 patients (17.9%) had non-mucinous cystic neoplasms (group B). The average age in groups A and B was 71.3 and 60.4 years, respectively. String sign was positive in 47 patients (51.1%) and negative in 21 patients (22.8%) in group A, while in group B, string sign was negative in 19 patients (95%). String sign showed significant correlation with the diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasms (OR 64.2, 95% CI 8.1–508.6, p = 0.0001). Cytology confirmed mucinous cystic neoplasms that included 32 patients; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of string sign for mucinous cystic neoplasms were high, reaching 93.8%, 85.7%, 96.8%, and 75%, respectively, with an excellent accuracy rate of 92.3%. Conclusions: The string sign is highly accurate for predicting pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms, and should be used as an important aid for improving diagnostic accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

15 pages, 2789 KiB  
Review
Biliary Tree Diagnostics: Advances in Endoscopic Imaging and Tissue Sampling
by Matteo Ghisa, Angelo Bellumat, Manuela De Bona, Flavio Valiante, Marco Tollardo, Gaia Riguccio, Angelo Iacobellis, Edoardo Savarino and Andrea Buda
Medicina 2022, 58(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010135 - 17 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2943
Abstract
The diagnostic approach to the biliary tree disorders can be challenging, especially for biliary strictures. Albeit the great diagnostic impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) which allows one to obtain fluoroscopic imaging and tissue sampling through brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy, a considerable [...] Read more.
The diagnostic approach to the biliary tree disorders can be challenging, especially for biliary strictures. Albeit the great diagnostic impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) which allows one to obtain fluoroscopic imaging and tissue sampling through brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy, a considerable proportion of cases remain indeterminate, leading to the risk of under/over treated patients. In the last two decades, several endoscopic techniques have been introduced in clinical practice, shrinking cases of uncertainties and improving diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this review is to discuss recent advances and emerging technologies applied to the management of biliary tree disorders through peroral endoscopy procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6890 KiB  
Review
Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques
by Edoardo Troncone, Michelangela Mossa, Pasquale De Vico, Giovanni Monteleone and Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco
Medicina 2022, 58(1), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010120 - 13 Jan 2022
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 7645
Abstract
Biliary stones represent the most common indication for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Many cases are successfully managed with biliary sphincterotomy and stone extraction with balloon or basket catheters. However, more complex conditions secondary to the specific features of stones, the biliary tract, or [...] Read more.
Biliary stones represent the most common indication for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Many cases are successfully managed with biliary sphincterotomy and stone extraction with balloon or basket catheters. However, more complex conditions secondary to the specific features of stones, the biliary tract, or patient’s needs could make the stone extraction with the standard techniques difficult. Traditionally, mechanical lithotripsy with baskets has been reported as a safe and effective technique to achieve stone clearance. More recently, the increasing use of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and the diffusion of single-operator cholangioscopy with laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy have brought new, safe, and effective therapeutic possibilities to the management of such challenging cases. We here summarize the available evidence about the endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones and discuss current indications of different lithotripsy techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2798 KiB  
Review
Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy: Timing and Technique
by Sergio Pinto, Saverio Bellizzi, Roberta Badas, Maria Laura Canfora, Erica Loddo, Simone Spada, Kareem Khalaf, Alessandro Fugazza and Silvio Bergamini
Medicina 2021, 57(12), 1305; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121305 - 28 Nov 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2854
Abstract
Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is one of the local complications of acute pancreatitis (AP). Several interventional techniques have been developed over the last few years. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore such methodologies, with specific focus on endoscopic drainage and [...] Read more.
Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is one of the local complications of acute pancreatitis (AP). Several interventional techniques have been developed over the last few years. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore such methodologies, with specific focus on endoscopic drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN), through evaluation of their indications and timing for intervention. Findings indicated how, after the introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), DEN is becoming the favorite technique to treat WOPN, especially when large solid debris or infection are present. Additionally, DEN is associated with a lower adverse events rate and hospital stay, and with improved clinical outcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1135 KiB  
Review
The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound
by Cecilia Binda, Chiara Coluccio, Gianmarco Marocchi, Monica Sbrancia and Carlo Fabbri
Medicina 2021, 57(10), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101085 - 11 Oct 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2291
Abstract
Over the last decades, contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) has emerged as an important diagnostic tool for the diagnosis and differentiation of several gastrointestinal diseases. The key advantage of CH-EUS is that the influx and washout of contrast in the target lesion can [...] Read more.
Over the last decades, contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) has emerged as an important diagnostic tool for the diagnosis and differentiation of several gastrointestinal diseases. The key advantage of CH-EUS is that the influx and washout of contrast in the target lesion can be observed in real time, accurately depicting microvasculature. CH-EUS is established as an evidence-based technique complementary to B-mode EUS to differentiate solid appearing structures, to characterize mass lesions, and to improve the staging of gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary cancer. In the last few years, interest has increased in the use of CH-EUS in interventional procedures such as tissue acquisition, tumor ablation, biliary drainage, and the management of pancreatic fluid collections. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the available evidence and future expectations of CH-EUS in interventional EUS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 443 KiB  
Review
EUS and ERCP in the Same Session for Biliary Stones: From Risk Stratification to Treatment Strategy in Different Clinical Conditions
by Pietro Fusaroli and Andrea Lisotti
Medicina 2021, 57(10), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101019 - 25 Sep 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3857
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, reaching a successful clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) in up to 90% of the cases. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the best diagnostic accuracy for CBD [...] Read more.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, reaching a successful clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) in up to 90% of the cases. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the best diagnostic accuracy for CBD stones, its sensitivity and specificity range being 89–94% and 94–95%, respectively. Traditionally seen as two separate entities, the two worlds of EUS and ERCP have recently come together under the new discipline of bilio-pancreatic endoscopy. Nevertheless, the complexity of both EUS and ERCP led the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy to identify quality in endoscopy as a top priority in its recent EUS and ERCP curriculum recommendations. The clinical benefits of performing EUS and ERCP in the same session are several, such as benefiting from real-time information from EUS, having one single sedation for both the diagnosis and the treatment of biliary stones, reducing the risk of cholangitis/acute pancreatitis while waiting for ERCP after the EUS diagnosis, and ultimately shortening the hospital stay and costs while preserving patients’ outcomes. Potential candidates for the same session approach include patients at high risk for CBD stones, symptomatic individuals with status post-cholecystectomy, pregnant women, and those unfit for surgery. This narrative review discusses the main technical aspects and evidence from the literature about EUS and ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

10 pages, 1520 KiB  
Perspective
Informed Consent for Endoscopic Biliary Drainage: Time for a New Paradigm
by Marco Spadaccini, Cecilia Binda, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Ilaria Tarantino, Carlo Fabbri, Luigi Cugia, Andrea Anderloni and on behalf of the Interventional Endoscopy & Ultra Sound (I-EUS) Group
Medicina 2022, 58(3), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030331 - 22 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3450
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered as the first option in the management of malignant biliary obstruction. In case of ERCP failure, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) has been conventionally considered as the preferred rescue strategy. However, the use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) [...] Read more.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered as the first option in the management of malignant biliary obstruction. In case of ERCP failure, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) has been conventionally considered as the preferred rescue strategy. However, the use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has proved similarly high rates of technical success, when compared to PTBD. As a matter of fact, biliary drainage is maybe the most evident paradigm of the increasing interconnection between ERCP and EUS, and obtaining an adequate informed consent (IC) is an emerging issue. The aim of this commentary is to discuss the reciprocal roles of ERCP and EUS for malignant biliary obstruction, in order to provide a guide to help in developing an appropriate informed consent reflecting the new biliopancreatic paradigm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 555 KiB  
Systematic Review
Biliopancreatic Endoscopy in Altered Anatomy
by Ilaria Tarantino and Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
Medicina 2021, 57(10), 1014; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101014 - 25 Sep 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2836
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Anatomical post-surgical alterations of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract have always been challenging for performing diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, especially when biliopancreatic diseases are involved. Esophagectomy, gastrectomy with various reconstructions and pancreaticoduodenectomy are among the most common surgeries causing [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Anatomical post-surgical alterations of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract have always been challenging for performing diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, especially when biliopancreatic diseases are involved. Esophagectomy, gastrectomy with various reconstructions and pancreaticoduodenectomy are among the most common surgeries causing upper GI tract alterations. Technological improvements and new methods have increased the endoscopic success rate in these patients, and the literature has been rapidly increasing over the past few years. The aim of this systematic review is to identify evidence on the available biliopancreatic endoscopic techniques performed in the altered post-surgical anatomy of upper GI tract. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS databases. Study-level variables extracted were the last name of the first author, publication year, study design, number of patients, type of post-surgical anatomical alteration, endoscopic technique, success rate and endoscopic-related adverse events. Results: Our primary search identified 221 titles, which was expanded with studies after the citation search. The final full-text review process identified 52 articles (31 retrospective studies, 8 prospective studies and 13 case reports). We found several different techniques developed over the years for biliopancreatic diseases in altered anatomy, in order to perform both endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). They included enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (double and single balloon enteroscopy-ERCP, spiral enteroscopy-ERCP) laparoscopic assisted ERCP, EUS-Directed transgastric ERCP, EUS-directed transgastric intervention, gastric access temporary for endoscopy, and percutaneous assisted trans prosthetic endoscopic therapy. The success rate was high (most of the techniques showed a success rate over 90%) and a low rate of adverse events were reported. Conclusions: We suggest the considerationof the novel techniques when approaching patients with altered anatomy who require biliopancreatic endoscopy, focusing on the surgery type, success rate and adverse events reported in the literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biliopancreatic Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop