Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals

A special issue of Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607). This special issue belongs to the section "Gut Microbiota".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2019) | Viewed by 52437

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
(MiCHAEL) Department of Ichthyology & Aquatic Environment, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
Interests: fish-microbe interactions; symbiosis; aquaculture; nutrition
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The last decade has seen rapid and spectacular ongoing progress in the multiple roles of gut microorganisms in humans. This knowledge and its concomitant technological progress is attracting increasing scientific interest for the investigation of animal gut microbiota and microbiomes. For various reasons, aquatic animals are no exception; such reasons are related to the eco-evolutionary history, the economic significance and ecological vulnerability of these animals and their habitats, in marine and fresh waters. The Special Issue entitled “Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals” aims to present recent research on any aspect of aquatic animal gut microbiology. Some of its focal points include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Gut microbes of animals living in extreme aquatic environments
  • Aquatic animal ontogeny and microbial succession
  • Gut microbiology of farmed aquatic animals
  • Gut Archaea and microscopic eukaryotes of aquatic animals
  • Novel methodologies for investigating gut microbes of aquatic animals
  • Pollution and other environmental stress factors on gut microbes of aquatic animals
  • Insights into the hologenome theory of evolution of aquatic animals

Prof. Dr. Konstantinos Kormas
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Microorganisms is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gut
  • microorganism
  • prokaryote
  • eukaryote
  • aquatic
  • animal
  • marine
  • freshwater
  • Bacteria
  • Archaea
  • microbiota
  • microbiome

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

2 pages, 165 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial for the Special Issue: Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals
by Konstantinos Ar. Kormas
Microorganisms 2019, 7(10), 377; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100377 - 21 Sep 2019
Viewed by 1905
Abstract
Since the introduction of the term holobiont [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

20 pages, 5205 KiB  
Article
Antibiotic-Induced Perturbations Are Manifested in the Dominant Intestinal Bacterial Phyla of Atlantic Salmon
by Shruti Gupta, Jorge Fernandes and Viswanath Kiron
Microorganisms 2019, 7(8), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080233 - 2 Aug 2019
Cited by 43 | Viewed by 5131
Abstract
The intestinal microbiota of certain farmed fish are often exposed to antimicrobial substances, such as antibiotics, that are used to prevent and treat bacterial diseases. Antibiotics that kill or inhibit the growth of harmful microbes can rapidly alter intestinal microbial diversity and composition, [...] Read more.
The intestinal microbiota of certain farmed fish are often exposed to antimicrobial substances, such as antibiotics, that are used to prevent and treat bacterial diseases. Antibiotics that kill or inhibit the growth of harmful microbes can rapidly alter intestinal microbial diversity and composition, with potential effects on the host health. In this study, we have elucidated the impact of two antibiotics, florfenicol and oxolinic acid, by employing a high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing technique on the distal and mid intestinal microbial communities of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). For this, Atlantic salmon were offered diets with or without antibiotics. We then investigated the bacterial communities in the intestinal mucus of the fish. Our results showed that antibiotic exposure shifts the intestinal microbial profile differentially. In addition, the bacterial compositions of the control and antibiotic-fed groups were significantly different. Antibiotic feeding altered the composition and abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla, namely Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Spirochaetes, Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes, and Thermotogae. The bacterial association network analysis also indicated the differential pattern of co-occurrence of bacteria in the three study groups. The results regarding the differences in the structure and association of the intestinal microbiota of Atlantic salmon after florfenicol and oxolinic acid feeding can be employed to attenuate the adverse effects of antibiotic feeding on fish. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 795 KiB  
Article
Investigation of the Potential Effects of Host Genetics and Probiotic Treatment on the Gut Bacterial Community Composition of Aquaculture-raised Pacific Whiteleg Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei
by Angela Landsman, Benoit St-Pierre, Misael Rosales-Leija, Michael Brown and William Gibbons
Microorganisms 2019, 7(8), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080217 - 26 Jul 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4546
Abstract
This study presents the potential effects of the genetic background and use of probiotics on the gut bacterial composition of Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) grown in an indoor aquaculture facility. The strains investigated were Shrimp Improvement Systems (SIS, Islamorada, FL, [...] Read more.
This study presents the potential effects of the genetic background and use of probiotics on the gut bacterial composition of Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) grown in an indoor aquaculture facility. The strains investigated were Shrimp Improvement Systems (SIS, Islamorada, FL, USA), a strain genetically selected for disease resistance, and an Oceanic Institute (OI, Oahu, HI, USA) strain, selected for growth performance. BioWish 3P (BioWish Technologies, Cincinnati, OH, USA) was the selected probiotic. The study consisted of two separate trials, where all shrimp were raised under standard industry conditions and fed the same diet. Shrimp were stocked in 2920 L production tanks at a density of 200/m3 and acclimated for 14 days. After the acclimation period, triplicate tanks were supplemented daily for a duration of 28 days with probiotics, while three other tanks did not receive any treatment (controls). During the 28-day trial period, there was no statistically supported difference (p > 0.05) in either performance or health status as a result of genetic background or probiotic treatment. However, differences in gut bacterial composition, as assessed by high throughput sequencing of amplicons generated from the V1-V3 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, were observed. The relative abundance of five major operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were found to vary significantly across experimental groups (p < 0.05). Notably, operational taxonomic unit (OTU) SD_Shr-00006 was at its highest abundance in d43 SIS samples, with levels greater than d71 samples of the same genetic line or any of the OI shrimp samples. OTUs for SD_Shr-00098 displayed a similar type of profile, but with highest abundance in the OI genetic line and lowest in the SIS shrimp. SD_Shr-00004 showed an opposite profile, with highest abundance in the SIS d71 samples and lowest in the SIS d43 samples. Together, these results suggest that host genetic background can be an important determinant of gut bacterial composition in aquaculture-raised whiteleg shrimp and indicate that development of strategies to manipulate the microbiome of this important seafood will likely need to be customized depending on the genetic line. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2332 KiB  
Article
Insights into the Potential of the Atlantic Cod Gut Microbiome as Biomarker of Oil Contamination in the Marine Environment
by Juline M. Walter, Andrea Bagi and Daniela M. Pampanin
Microorganisms 2019, 7(7), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7070209 - 22 Jul 2019
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 5655
Abstract
Background: Microorganisms are widespread in all environments, including in and on animal bodies. The gut microbiome has an essential influence on fish health, and is affected by several persistent and harmful organic and inorganic contaminants. Considering the shifts in gut microbiota composition observed [...] Read more.
Background: Microorganisms are widespread in all environments, including in and on animal bodies. The gut microbiome has an essential influence on fish health, and is affected by several persistent and harmful organic and inorganic contaminants. Considering the shifts in gut microbiota composition observed in those studies, we hypothesized that certain microbial groups in the gut can serve as indicators of pollution. To test this hypothesis, we explored the possibility of identifying key microbial players that indicate environmental contamination. Methods: Published 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data generated from the gut microbiota of Atlantic cod caught in geographically different Norwegian waters were used for bacterial diversity comparison. Results: Different microbiomes were identified between the northern Norway and southern Norway samples. Several bacterial genera previously identified as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degraders were present only in the samples collected in the southern Norway area, suggesting fish contamination with oil-related compounds. Conclusions: The results contribute to the identification of bacterial taxa present in the Atlantic cod gut that indicate fish exposure to contaminants in the marine environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3901 KiB  
Article
Stimulated Growth and Innate Immunity in Brook Charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) Treated with a General Probiotic (Bactocell®) and Two Endogenous Probiotics That Inhibit Aeromonas salmonicida In Vitro
by Jeff Gauthier, Stéphanie Rouleau-Breton, Steve J. Charette and Nicolas Derome
Microorganisms 2019, 7(7), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7070193 - 6 Jul 2019
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4031
Abstract
Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida is a Gram-negative bacterium causing furunculosis, an opportunistic infection of farmed salmonid fish. Current treatment methods against furunculosis rely heavily on antibiotherapy. However, strains of this opportunistic fish pathogen were found to possess genes that confer resistance to major [...] Read more.
Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida is a Gram-negative bacterium causing furunculosis, an opportunistic infection of farmed salmonid fish. Current treatment methods against furunculosis rely heavily on antibiotherapy. However, strains of this opportunistic fish pathogen were found to possess genes that confer resistance to major antibiotics including those used to cure furunculosis. Therefore, dispensing bacterial symbionts as probiotics to susceptible hosts appears to be a promising alternative. Here, we present the genomic characterization and in vivo safety assessment of two brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) bacterial symbionts that inhibited A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida growth in vitro (Pseudomonas fluorescens ML11A and Aeromonas sobria TM18) as well as a commercialized probiotic, Pediococcus acidilactici MA18/5M (Bactocell®). The genomic sequences of ML11A and TM18 obtained by whole-genome shotgun sequencing lack key virulence factor genes found in related pathogenic strains. Their genomic sequences are also devoid of genes involved in the inactivation (or target modification of) several key antimicrobial compounds used in salmonid aquaculture. Finally, when administered daily to live brook charr fingerlings, ML11A, TM18 and Bactocell® helped improve several physiological condition metrics such as mean body weight, Fulton’s condition factor and blood plasma lysozyme activity (an indicator for innate immune activity). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1469 KiB  
Article
Impact of Aquaculture Practices on Intestinal Bacterial Profiles of Pacific Whiteleg Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
by Angela Landsman, Benoit St-Pierre, Misael Rosales-Leija, Michael Brown and William Gibbons
Microorganisms 2019, 7(4), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7040093 - 30 Mar 2019
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 7517
Abstract
Considering the crucial role of the gut microbiome in animal health and nutrition, solutions to shrimp aquaculture challenges, such as improving disease resistance and optimizing growth on lower cost feeds, may lie in manipulation of their microbial symbionts. However, achieving this goal will [...] Read more.
Considering the crucial role of the gut microbiome in animal health and nutrition, solutions to shrimp aquaculture challenges, such as improving disease resistance and optimizing growth on lower cost feeds, may lie in manipulation of their microbial symbionts. However, achieving this goal will require a deeper understanding of shrimp microbial communities and how their composition is influenced by diet formulation, environmental conditions, and host factors. In this context, the current study investigated the intestinal bacterial communities of the Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei—the most widely aquaculture-farmed shrimp worldwide) reared in indoor aquaculture facilities and outdoor pond systems. While samples showed very consistent intestinal bacterial community profiles within each production system, major differences were uncovered between the two practices. Indeed, bacteria affiliated with Rhodobacteraceae (Proteobacteria) and Actinobacteria were significantly more abundant in indoor samples (84.4% vs. 5.1%; 3.0% vs. 0.06%, respectively), while Vibrionaceae (Proteobacteria), Firmicutes, Fusobacteria and Cyanobacteria were predominant in pond samples (0.03% vs. 44.8%; 0.7% vs. 36.0%; 0.0% vs. 7.9%; 0.001% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Accordingly, the abundance of 11 of the 12 most prominent Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were found to be statistically different between the two production environments. Together, these results indicate that aquaculture practices greatly influence the intestinal bacterial profile of the whiteleg shrimp, and further suggest that bacterial communities of this economically important crustacean could be effectively manipulated using diet composition or environmental conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1619 KiB  
Article
Gut Bacterial Communities in Geographically Distant Populations of Farmed Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) and Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
by Eleni Nikouli, Alexandra Meziti, Efthimia Antonopoulou, Eleni Mente and Konstantinos A. Kormas
Microorganisms 2018, 6(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6030092 - 1 Sep 2018
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 6471
Abstract
This study investigated the profile of the autochthonous gut bacterial communities in adult individuals of Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax reared in sea cages in five distantly located aquaculture farms in Greece and determine the impact of geographic location on them in order [...] Read more.
This study investigated the profile of the autochthonous gut bacterial communities in adult individuals of Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax reared in sea cages in five distantly located aquaculture farms in Greece and determine the impact of geographic location on them in order to detect the core gut microbiota of these commercially important fish species. Data analyses resulted in no significant geographic impact in the gut microbial communities within the two host species, while strong similarities between them were also present. Our survey revealed the existence of a core gut microbiota within and between the two host species independent of diet and geographic location consisting of the Delftia, Pseudomonas, Pelomonas, Propionibacterium, and Atopostipes genera. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 1258 KiB  
Communication
Microbial Community and Potential Pathogen Shifts Along an Ornamental Fish Supply Chain
by Linda A. Amaral-Zettler, Victor Schmidt and Katherine F. Smith
Microorganisms 2018, 6(3), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6030091 - 25 Aug 2018
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5043
Abstract
There is broad interest in disease spread through the pet trade, but empirical research on hosts and pathogens in transit along actual trade routes is notably absent. Using next-generation DNA sequencing, and partnering with the ornamental fish industry, we tracked shifts in microbial [...] Read more.
There is broad interest in disease spread through the pet trade, but empirical research on hosts and pathogens in transit along actual trade routes is notably absent. Using next-generation DNA sequencing, and partnering with the ornamental fish industry, we tracked shifts in microbial community and potential pathogen structure associated with Sailfin Tang (Zebrasoma desjardinii) along the United States (U.S.) leg of an international supply chain. We observed striking changes in microbial diversity and composition of potential pathogens, including increased dominance of vibrios of fishes in transit. Our pilot findings suggest that high investment in fishes early in the supply chain may not matter to their long-term health depending on end destination conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1879 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Impact of the Biofloc Rearing System and an Oral WSSV Challenge on the Intestinal Bacteriome of Litopenaeus vannamei
by Mariana R. Pilotto, André N. A. Goncalves, Felipe N. Vieira, Walter Q. Seifert, Evelyne Bachère, Rafael D. Rosa and Luciane M. Perazzolo
Microorganisms 2018, 6(3), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6030083 - 8 Aug 2018
Cited by 51 | Viewed by 10854
Abstract
We provide a global overview of the intestinal bacteriome of Litopenaeus vannamei in two rearing systems and after an oral challenge by the White spot syndrome virus (WSSV). By using a high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology, we identified and compared the composition [...] Read more.
We provide a global overview of the intestinal bacteriome of Litopenaeus vannamei in two rearing systems and after an oral challenge by the White spot syndrome virus (WSSV). By using a high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology, we identified and compared the composition and abundance of bacterial communities from the midgut of shrimp reared in the super-intensive biofloc technology (BFT) and clear seawater system (CWS). The predominant bacterial group belonged to the phylum Proteobacteria, followed by the phyla Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. Within Proteobacteria, the family Vibrionaceae, which includes opportunistic shrimp pathogens, was more abundant in CWS than in BFT-reared shrimp. Whereas the families Rhodobacteraceae and Enterobacteriaceae accounted for almost 20% of the bacterial communities of shrimp cultured in BFT, they corresponded to less than 3% in CWS-reared animals. Interestingly, the WSSV challenge dramatically changed the bacterial communities in terms of composition and abundance in comparison to its related unchallenged group. Proteobacteria remained the dominant phylum. Vibrionaceae was the most affected in BFT-reared shrimp (from 11.35 to 20.80%). By contrast, in CWS-reared animals the abundance of this family decreased from 68.23 to 23.38%. Our results provide new evidence on the influence of both abiotic and biotic factors on the gut bacteriome of aquatic species of commercial interest. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop