Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
2.6
1.7
Journals
Social Sciences
Special Issues
Immigration and Refugee Integration Policy in the United States
share announcement

Immigration and Refugee Integration Policy in the United States

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "International Migration".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 June 2019) | Viewed by 12250

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Larry Nackerud

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Work, University of Georgia, 279 Williams Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Interests: U.S. immigration and refugee policy; research methodogies
Dr. Lauren Ricciardelli

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Work and Human Services, Troy University, Troy, AL 36867, USA
Interests: disability; social welfare; criminal justice policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In this historical moment, U.S. immigration and refugee policy is sorely maligned and misunderstood. While this policy arena has always had a good deal of complexity in policy development, interpretation, and implementation, the chaos now seems unprecedented.  Persons in positions of social and political leadership seem unable, or unwilling, to gain an understanding of the varied entrant and visa categories, the difference between family reunification and employment based entrants, and the difference in the journey of a person seeking asylum and that of a person arriving in the United States as a vetted political refugee.  The political, social, and moral distance between “open borders” and “zero tolerance” has never seemed more incalculable. The criminalization of immigration and refugee policy and the infusion of national security concerns into the policy arena have never been more prominent. For a country that prides itself on being a “nation of immigrants,” the United States is fast slipping from its leadership role in the international community to land on a position of near complete isolationism regarding welcoming persons from other countries into the United States—both for persons who enter with the intent of remaining permanently or even those who wish to remain only temporarily. And the voice of those who advocate for consideration of amnesty for the millions of undocumented persons in the United States is almost completely silenced. The goal of the editors for this special edition is to help bring a sense of scholarly clarity to bear. We welcome papers/manuscripts from a wide range of political and social science research perspectives.

Prof. Larry Nackerud
Dr. Lauren Ricciardelli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • immigration
  • refugee
  • asylum
  • amnesty
  • disability/rights
  • criminalization
  • national security
  • due process
  • family separation
  • detention

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 538 KiB  
Article
Sanctuary Cities: What Global Migration Means for Local Governments
by Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez
Soc. Sci. 2020, 9(8), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080146 - 14 Aug 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 7856
Abstract
Cities have become active participants in implementing migration policies, thereby expanding the meaning of the word “global” with regard to the activity of local governments. International movement tends to flow toward and converge on metropolitan areas. This paper discusses the role of cities [...] Read more.
Cities have become active participants in implementing migration policies, thereby expanding the meaning of the word “global” with regard to the activity of local governments. International movement tends to flow toward and converge on metropolitan areas. This paper discusses the role of cities in immigration policy by taking into consideration legitimacy, authority, and public governance. Under Donald Trump’s crackdown on sanctuary cities, this study sheds light on implementation policies worldwide, and on the role of social demands in opening cities to migrants. Finally, the sovereignty-free approach explains why cities like San Francisco and Barcelona have opposed national foreign policy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immigration and Refugee Integration Policy in the United States)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 261 KiB  
Article
Mutual Benefit: How Vocational Training Programs Utilize Employer Engagement and Refugee Strengths to Facilitate Integration
by Audrey Lumley-Sapanski and Nancy Joyce Callahan
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(5), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050145 - 8 May 2019
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3864
Abstract
Successful integration of newly arriving refugees requires the engagement of the receiving community and active facilitation of integration through provision of employment, access to housing, and protection of basic rights. Understanding how local entities effectively facilitate integration is important for policymakers and scholars [...] Read more.
Successful integration of newly arriving refugees requires the engagement of the receiving community and active facilitation of integration through provision of employment, access to housing, and protection of basic rights. Understanding how local entities effectively facilitate integration is important for policymakers and scholars interested in identifying best practices and replicating outcomes. This study examines the integration outcomes of refugees who participated in a vocational hospitality training program in Chicago, Illinois between 2008 and 2012. In particular, we explore the integration experiences—using employment, housing, and homeownership—of Bhutanese origin refugees who represented the largest country of origin group in the hospitality course. We find that the Bhutanese refugees who participated in the course had high rates of homeownership, stable employment, higher wages and experienced socioeconomic upward mobility—positive indicators of integration. In our analysis, we identify three reasons the program is successful in facilitating integration: a practice of selective enrollment, active employer engagement, and informed industry selection. Importantly, our findings suggest a positive benefit for employers in addition to refugee employees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immigration and Refugee Integration Policy in the United States)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop