sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2024) | Viewed by 21085

Special Issue Editors

Lord Ashcroft International Business School, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
Interests: applied macroeconomics; energy economics; sustainable finance; financial theory and markets; investments; asset pricing

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
Interests: economic development; conflict; quality of institutions; inequality

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Econometrics and Applied Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
Interests: macro-econometric modelling and forecasting with special interests in energy economics; macroeconomics; financial economics and climate risks
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to develop new knowledge and reach a broad audience of academic researchers, practitioners, and regulators with novel research on the topic of Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development. We welcome submissions that represent original, high-quality theoretical and empirical research, as well as policy-oriented research papers.

We particularly encourage research that focuses on climate-related and environmental risks/factors and their relationships with sustainable economic development. Possible research topics include but are not limited to climate-related and environmental risks/factors and their relationships with sustainable economic growth, sustainable financing, green economy, ESG investing, asset pricing, and financial stability. The issue is expected to contribute to existing literature and knowledge helping sustainable economic development, promoting sustainable corporate governance and investments, and supporting businesses' adaptions to the transitions to a sustainable and green economy. Investors and businesses can better understand the full range of climate-related and environmental risk factors they face, and integrate these factors into their finance and investment decision-making processes and their risks and returns calculations. It will inform policies on how and where to target policy interventions that would support businesses and the market to understand and assess climate-related and environmental risks and also seize opportunities that emerged in the transition to a sustainable and green economy.

Dr. Xin Sheng
Dr. Carolyn Chisadza
Prof. Dr. Afees A. Salisu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • climate change
  • environmental risks
  • sustainability
  • sustainable economic development
  • sustainable financing
  • green economy
  • green growth
  • green investments
  • ESG investing, risk management
  • policy
  • financial stability

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 403 KiB  
Article
Research on Energy Conservation and Emission-Reduction Effects of Green Finance: Evidence from China
by Runnan Jiang, Chengxiao Jin and Haoyu Wang
Sustainability 2024, 16(8), 3257; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083257 - 13 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1582
Abstract
The energy-saving and low-carbon development model is one of the important symbols of high-quality economic development. This article attempts to study the environmental effects of green finance from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, that is, to test whether green finance policies contribute to [...] Read more.
The energy-saving and low-carbon development model is one of the important symbols of high-quality economic development. This article attempts to study the environmental effects of green finance from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, that is, to test whether green finance policies contribute to achieving energy conservation and emission reduction. This article is based on provincial panel data from 2007 to 2020 in China and constructs a dynamic spatial Durbin model to examine the impact of green finance on environmental pollution and energy intensity. The results indicate that (1) green finance can achieve a dual effect of energy conservation and emission reduction simultaneously and has a significant promoting effect on energy conservation and emission reduction in neighboring regions. This conclusion is still valid after conducting robustness tests. (2) The energy-saving and emission-reduction effects of green finance exhibit significant regional heterogeneity, indicating that the performance of green finance is more outstanding in the eastern region with a higher level of economic development. (3) Mechanism testing has found that green finance can achieve energy-saving and emission-reduction effects through four channels: environmental regulation, credit allocation, enterprise profits, and enterprise innovation. Therefore, in order to further promote high-quality economic development, we need to build a comprehensive and multi-level green finance system, enrich the green finance policy toolbox, and smooth the transmission channels of green finance to promote green and stable economic development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 616 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Using Renewable Energy Resources on Sustainable Development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
by Abdullah Sultan Al Shammre
Sustainability 2024, 16(3), 1324; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031324 - 4 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2515
Abstract
This study examines the impact of renewable energy on sustainable development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from 2000 to 2019 and analyzes the kingdom’s most essential practices in this field to achieve sustainable development. The Cobb–Douglas production function is used in this [...] Read more.
This study examines the impact of renewable energy on sustainable development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from 2000 to 2019 and analyzes the kingdom’s most essential practices in this field to achieve sustainable development. The Cobb–Douglas production function is used in this study to investigate the impact of renewable energy on sustainable development using ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation. According to the findings, renewable energy consumption has a negative but insignificant effect on GDP. Additionally, traditional energy consumption has a major negative influence on GDP. The findings also demonstrate that fixed capital formulation and technical progress have a significant positive impact on Saudi Arabia’s sustainable development. Furthermore, while the labor force has a positive impact on GDP, this effect is not statistically significant. This report provides some recommendations for Saudi government policymakers to reform the country’s energy efficiency and consumption technologies in order to reduce energy waste and satisfy the goals of sustainable development. While the labor force is recognized as having a positive influence on GDP, it is notable that this result lacks statistical significance. The suggestions of these findings are mainly applicable to Saudi policymakers, and we present recommendations to improve energy competence and utilization technologies. Specially, our suggestions are intended to reduce energy dissipation and to support the objectives of sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 944 KiB  
Article
Climate Change, Technology Shocks and the US Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
by Afees A. Salisu, Yinka S. Hammed and Ibrahim Ngananga Ouattara
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14536; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914536 - 6 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1914
Abstract
Given the renewed interest in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), we are keenly focused on exploring the possible connection between climate change and return volatility of US equity REITs, as well as the role of technology innovation for environmental sustainability in the nexus. [...] Read more.
Given the renewed interest in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), we are keenly focused on exploring the possible connection between climate change and return volatility of US equity REITs, as well as the role of technology innovation for environmental sustainability in the nexus. While climate change might pose some threat to the REIT business, it is necessary to know the direction in which technological innovation can mitigate this impact. As a way to validate our evidence, we offer some additional analyses with alternative measures of technology shocks and the replacement of technology shocks with global economic expansion, as improvement in global economic activity could offer more investment options for investors to diversify their investment portfolio away from climate-prone assets. For completeness, the analyses are replicated for US mortgage REITs. Overall, we show that climate change heightens the return volatility of US equity REITs and that the former contains some predictive content for the latter. When the role of technology is examined, our results show that technology shock indeed reverses the cheering impact of temperature anomaly on the return volatility of US equity REITs. We show that these results are robust to alternative measures of economic shock and that the results equally hold for mortgage REITs. We further document some important implications of our findings for investors and policymakers alike. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 476 KiB  
Article
Green Household Technology and Its Impacts on Environmental Sustainability in China
by Qin Meng, Jing-Wen Zhang, Yunxu Wang, Hsu-Ling Chang and Chi-Wei Su
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 12919; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712919 - 27 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1617
Abstract
China has made a commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, and promoting a green lifestyle is an essential means to this end. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the asymmetric impact of green household technology on environmental sustainability in [...] Read more.
China has made a commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, and promoting a green lifestyle is an essential means to this end. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the asymmetric impact of green household technology on environmental sustainability in China. To that end, we have employed linear and non-linear auto-regressive distributed lag models to identify this complicated effect. The empirical results suggest that green household technology’s positive change exerts significant and negative effect on carbon emission in the short and long terms. And the impacts of green household technology’s negative change on carbon emission are significantly negative but smaller than its positive change in the long run, while insignificant in the short term. The estimates endorse the asymmetric impact of green household technology on carbon emissions both in the short and long term. This finding suggests that the improvement of green household technology can reduce carbon emissions, while a decline in it causes carbon emissions to rise, and technological retrogression plays a less influential role than its development. This research is a groundbreaking point in discussing the way towards environmental sustainability from a green household technology perspective, which considers the asymmetric effect and provides meaningful insights for China to achieve sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 4852 KiB  
Article
Just Energy Transition of South Africa in a Post-COVID Era
by Heinrich R. Bohlmann, Jessika A. Bohlmann, Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu and Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Sustainability 2023, 15(14), 10854; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410854 - 11 Jul 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3753
Abstract
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have sparked global debate over how green economic recovery may and should be, and if the pandemic has accelerated the present energy transition while assuring a just transition for vulnerable populations such as unskilled workers and women. [...] Read more.
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have sparked global debate over how green economic recovery may and should be, and if the pandemic has accelerated the present energy transition while assuring a just transition for vulnerable populations such as unskilled workers and women. This study investigates the socioeconomic impact of South Africa’s planned green energy transition, with a focus on the Mpumalanga province—the country’s largest coal mining region with many coal-fired power plants. Using a regional-dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, the study analyses the economy-wide effects of different policy scenarios related to a changing electricity generation mix, investment financing costs, and international action against non-compliant industries, amongst others, with a specific focus on the vulnerable industries and population groups in Mpumalanga. Key results from the study highlights that (1) the structure of the Mpumalanga economy will be affected in the medium to long run regardless of the domestic transition path, (2) the Mpumalanga economy is indeed in danger of shrinking relative to the baseline, unless the Just Energy Transition (JET) is quickly and carefully managed, and (3) at a national level, at least, there is the strong possibility of a double dividend when greening the South African economy with overall economic growth and environmental outcomes expected to improve in the long run. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2165 KiB  
Article
MCDM-Based Ranking and Prioritization of Fisheries’ Risks: A Case Study of Sindh, Pakistan
by Ana Mehak, Yongtong Mu, Muhammad Mohsin and Xing-Can Zhang
Sustainability 2023, 15(11), 8519; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118519 - 24 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2591
Abstract
The fisheries sector in developing countries, including Pakistan, faces various risks that have not been comprehensively studied and addressed through policy measures. This study aims to analyze fisheries’ risks in Pakistan by following a risk management process and using statistical analysis. The data [...] Read more.
The fisheries sector in developing countries, including Pakistan, faces various risks that have not been comprehensively studied and addressed through policy measures. This study aims to analyze fisheries’ risks in Pakistan by following a risk management process and using statistical analysis. The data was collected through structured questionnaire surveys, and subsequently, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP) and importance performance analysis (IPA) were utilized to analyze the data. The study ranked the top five risks in order of importance as management, technical, economic, environmental, and occupational risks. The study also identified high-importance, low-performance sub-factors, including inadequate legislative implementation, overexploitation, and infrastructure shortages. It was found that there is low risk perception and inadequate management regulations in the sector. The findings suggest that risk management strategies, such as risk avoidance and risk transfer, can be used to mitigate fisheries’ risks. The study highlights the need for policy measures to revitalize the fisheries sector in Pakistan and provides recommendations for further research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 840 KiB  
Communication
Climate Change and Inequality: Evidence from the United States
by Carolyn Chisadza, Matthew Clance, Xin Sheng and Rangan Gupta
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5322; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065322 - 17 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3314
Abstract
This paper examines the effects of climate change on income inequality in the United States. Computing impulse response functions (IRFs) from the local projections’ method, we empirically show that there is an immediate temporary positive response in income inequality from rising temperatures within [...] Read more.
This paper examines the effects of climate change on income inequality in the United States. Computing impulse response functions (IRFs) from the local projections’ method, we empirically show that there is an immediate temporary positive response in income inequality from rising temperatures within the first year. We also observe differences in the effects of temperature growth on inequality across different classifications, mainly states with high inequality and low temperature growth are more susceptible to changes in temperature growth than states with already high temperature growth and high inequality growth. States with low inequality growth exhibit similar positive effects on income inequality across low- and high-temperature-growth classifications. We find that the initial positive effect on income inequality is not permanent. However, if the effects of rising temperatures are unabated in the earlier periods, income inequality starts to rise in the later periods. Our results highlight an important pathway, that climate change can negatively affect sustainable development through increased income inequality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Environmental Perceptions and Sustainable Consumption Behavior: The Disparity among South Africans
by Frederich Kirsten and Mduduzi Eligius Biyase
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 4847; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064847 - 9 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2565
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of sociodemographic factors on the environmental perceptions and sustainable consumption behavior in South Africa, a country with the highest record of inequality in the world. Few studies have examined the ways in which [...] Read more.
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of sociodemographic factors on the environmental perceptions and sustainable consumption behavior in South Africa, a country with the highest record of inequality in the world. Few studies have examined the ways in which people in low-income countries perceive social and environmental problems. By using the International Social Survey Programme Environment III dataset for 2010, this study assessed the impact of sociodemographic factors on the environmental perceptions and sustainable consumption behavior of South Africans. The results show that environmental concern rates are highest among those with low socioeconomic status and African people. Since these individuals constitute the majority of the most vulnerable population in society, it supports the exposure to degradation hypothesis in a South African context. In contrast, sustainable consumption behavior rate is highest among those with high socioeconomic status, suggesting a strong post-materialist effect on pro-environmental consumption. From a policy perspective, environmental policymakers in South Africa could take note of the strong environmental concerns among those more vulnerable to daily environmental degradation and provide further incentives and support their transition to sustainable consumption behavior changes that would assist in environmental protection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Climate, and Sustainable Economic Development)
Back to TopTop