sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Framework for Managing Sustainable Development

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2023) | Viewed by 4779

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, Campus Gotland, 62157 Visby, Sweden
2. Department of Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden
Interests: quality for sustainability; sustainable building and sustainable cement
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, Campus Gotland, 62157 Visby, Sweden
2. Department of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Campus Gotland, 62157 Visby, Sweden
Interests: political economy; urban public space; digital technology; information flows; smart cities

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The spotlight placed on sustainable development is an advantage and a disadvantage.  The advantage is that companies, institutions and decision makers need to work with sustainability and sustainable development. The disadvantage is that the terms can be used as mere labels to be pasted onto all sorts of initiatives, technologies, models and solutions. It could be that the possibility to label anything as sustainable comes from a lack of a common understanding of what constitutes sustainability and how it connects to a overarching framework of sustainable development. Defining materiality—that is, understanding what is important for organizational sustainability—in the entire value chain while considering the main sustainability impacts could be a challenge. The key issue is that without a clear understanding of the main problems that are contributing to the current sustainability performance, any solution, no matter how well intentioned, will not contribute effectively towards sustainable development. This Special Issue seeks papers that will help in building a framework for sustainable development to act as a roadmap towards sustainability.  Articles critical to the assumptions described below are welcome. This work is based on the following assumptions:

  • Sustainability is viewed as a state—the level of sustainability, like a level of quality;
  • Sustainable development is the process of change that takes us from the current level of sustainability to a state of sustainability where a system can continue to exist without negatively affecting sub-systems it is dependent on and changing at a pace that avoids the destruction of sub-systems (e.g., reducing greenhouse gas emissions quickly enough to avoid cooking the planet);
  • Sensemaking of sustainable development is viewed in the stages of: understanding, defining, measuring, communicating, and leading sustainable development (Isaksson and Rosvall, 2020);
  • Improvement is defined using a six-step generic process: diagnosing, analyzing, solving, improving, anchoring and studying (Isaksson, 2015);
  • These two models could possibly be formed into a matrix that could become a roadmap for sustainable development.

The focus is on carrying out research that contributes to understanding sustainable development and to practically making sustainable development happen. We believe that studies that use multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches are particularly suitable. We further believe that understanding sustainability from the perspective of Science-Based Targets (SBTs), the GRI reporting standards, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Planetary Boundaries and the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development (FSSD) could help. Additionally, exemplifying sustainability and sustainable development within a specific context is of interest. Our research indicates that sustainability has to be understood, defined and measured in concrete contexts and within important sectors such as housing, transport, food systems, energy, tourism, healthcare and education. Even for the measurement of carbon emissions that are essential for all companies, reporting is often partial and does not account for the entire value chain. The editors of this Special Issue of Sustainability urge the contributors to think in terms of measuring sustainability in a manner that makes it concrete, real, and contextual for a system or a sector.

Dr. Raine Isaksson
Dr. Swaminathan Ramanathan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • understanding sustainable development
  • system
  • process
  • stakeholder needs focus

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 506 KiB  
Article
Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Building Blocks—Diagnosing Opportunities in Sub-Saharan Africa
by Raine Isaksson, Max Rosvall, Arezou Babaahmadi, Apollo Buregyeya, Amrita Hazarika, Joseph Mwiti Marangu, Kolawole Olonade, Swaminathan Ramanathan, Anthony Rucukye and Luca Valentini
Sustainability 2023, 15(7), 5822; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075822 - 27 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1873
Abstract
Sustainable building should at least be affordable and carbon neutral. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is a region struggling with housing affordability. Residential buildings are often constructed using block-based materials. These are increasingly produced using ordinary Portland cement (PC), which has a high carbon footprint. [...] Read more.
Sustainable building should at least be affordable and carbon neutral. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is a region struggling with housing affordability. Residential buildings are often constructed using block-based materials. These are increasingly produced using ordinary Portland cement (PC), which has a high carbon footprint. Using alternative Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) for block production might reduce the footprint and price. The purpose is to assess the level of information for SCM use in blocks in SSA and to use this information for Diagnosing the improvement potential as part of an Opportunity Study. Results from the scoping review show that aggregated information on SCMs and the quantities available is limited. Diagnosing the theoretical improvement potential in using cassava peel ash, rice husk ash, corn cob ash, volcanic ash and calcined clays, indicates that SCMs could represent a yearly value of approximately USD 400 million, which could be transferred from buying cement to local production. The use of SCMs could save 1.7 million tonnes of CO2 per year and create some 50,000 jobs. About 5% of the PC used for block production could be substituted, indicating that, in addition to using SCMs, other solutions are needed to secure production of sustainable blocks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Framework for Managing Sustainable Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4266 KiB  
Article
How Is Building Sustainability Understood?—A Study of Research Papers and Sustainability Reports
by Raine Isaksson, Max Rosvall, Maximilian Espuny, Thais Vieira Nunhes and Otávio José de Oliveira
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12430; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912430 - 29 Sep 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2284
Abstract
The global process of providing shelter plays an important role in sustainable development. Buildings are estimated to be responsible for up to 50% of global carbon emissions, which makes building a major issue for climate change. The common saying is that what “we [...] Read more.
The global process of providing shelter plays an important role in sustainable development. Buildings are estimated to be responsible for up to 50% of global carbon emissions, which makes building a major issue for climate change. The common saying is that what “we cannot measure, we cannot improve”. This assumes that we know what to measure, which requires that we have a common understanding. The indication is that there could be problems in how we understand building sustainability, which, if true, will reduce change towards sustainable building. The purpose of this paper is to assess how building sustainability is understood in building research and building practice. The research approach is to review how building researchers and building companies have interpreted sustainability in leading articles and in leading sustainability reports. These are assessed by studying how sustainability is described and then in more detail applying two maturity matrices on the articles and the reports. The preliminary results indicate that there could be a major problem in understanding sustainability among both building researchers and building company managers, which could constitute a significant obstacle to improving building sustainability. This might not only be related to building sustainability but could be a general problem. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Framework for Managing Sustainable Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop