Brain Asymmetry in Cognitive and Behavioral Perception

A special issue of Symmetry (ISSN 2073-8994). This special issue belongs to the section "Life Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2025 | Viewed by 2722

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Neuro-Com Research Group, Department of Audiovisual Communication and Advertising, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
Interests: cognitive neuroscience; visual perception; neuroscience and communication; electroencephalography (EEG); functional connectivity

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research and Development, Instituto de Radio Televisión Española, Corporación Radio Televisión Española, 08174 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
Interests: cognitive neuroscience; media perception; neuroscience and communication; visual processing; brain connectivity

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Brain asymmetry is a topic of great interest in cognitive neuroscience. Structural and functional symmetries are characteristic of biology and nature. However, how the human brain works symmetrically and asymmetrically is yet to be determined. Several studies have proven asymmetry in cognitive and behavioral functions such as visual perception, auditory perception, attention, emotion, and language, among many others.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to study how the brain hemispheres are related and organized to approach cognitive perception and behavior in terms of asymmetry, and to investigate the symmetry and asymmetry of the brain in cognitive and behavioral processes.

We welcome papers studying electrophysiology, neuroimaging techniques, and behavioral analyses.

Dr. Celia Andreu-Sánchez
Dr. Miguel Ángel Martín-Pascual
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Symmetry is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • brain asymmetry
  • cognitive neuroscience
  • cognitive perception
  • functional connectivity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

8 pages, 560 KiB  
Article
Lack of Brain Asymmetry in the Alpha Band During the Observation of Object Grasping in Reality Versus on Screen
by Celia Andreu-Sánchez, Miguel Ángel Martín-Pascual, Agnès Gruart and José María Delgado-García
Symmetry 2024, 16(11), 1534; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111534 - 16 Nov 2024
Viewed by 365
Abstract
The way audiovisuals are perceived is not completely understood. Previous works have shown that attention increases when watching audiovisuals compared with looking at real events, but depending on the editing style, and the interpreter, the understanding of the content may be different. The [...] Read more.
The way audiovisuals are perceived is not completely understood. Previous works have shown that attention increases when watching audiovisuals compared with looking at real events, but depending on the editing style, and the interpreter, the understanding of the content may be different. The study of brain asymmetries in this context aims to identify potential lateralizations in audiovisual perception. Previous studies have proven that seeing others grasp objects has a contralateral impact on somatosensory areas (C3 and C4) in the alpha band (8–12 Hz). In this work, we investigated whether brain activity could be asymmetrical in that band when looking at real grasping compared with watching grasping on a screen, and whether media expertise would be a determinant in this regard and presented the same narrative content both through live performance and as a movie to 40 participants (half of them media professionals) while recording their electroencephalography (EEG) activity. We conclude that the asymmetry in the alpha band in the somatosensory cortex is not affected by the medium through which the grasping actions are presented, that is, in reality or on screen. We also conclude that media expertise does not impact this asymmetry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Asymmetry in Cognitive and Behavioral Perception)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1167 KiB  
Article
Asymmetric Activation of Frontal Brain Regions during Cognitive Reappraisal Generation—A Function of Implemented Reappraisal Strategy?
by Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan, Andreas Fink and Ilona Papousek
Symmetry 2023, 15(10), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101887 - 8 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1787
Abstract
Prefrontal cortex activity facilitates emotion regulation by cognitive reappraisal. Yet, neuroimaging studies have yielded disparate findings as to whether relatively greater left or right prefrontal activity is more beneficial for reappraisal success. We argue that differences in hemispheric activation during reappraisal efforts may [...] Read more.
Prefrontal cortex activity facilitates emotion regulation by cognitive reappraisal. Yet, neuroimaging studies have yielded disparate findings as to whether relatively greater left or right prefrontal activity is more beneficial for reappraisal success. We argue that differences in hemispheric activation during reappraisal efforts may depend on the specific and diverse cognitive strategies utilized to reappraise negative stimuli. In this EEG study, n = 94 participants were randomly assigned to three groups and instructed to either generate problem-oriented reappraisals, positive reinterpretations, or distancing reappraisals for anger-eliciting situations while EEG alpha asymmetry changes in the prefrontal cortex were recorded (F3–F4, F7–F8, and Fp1–Fp2). Engaging in problem orientation yielded a right-lateralized frontal activation pattern and was linked to the highest reappraisal success (percentage of strategy-conforming reappraisals), along with the highest believability ratings. Conversely, engaging in distancing reappraisal yielded a left-lateralized frontal EEG pattern, along with the highest ideational fluency and lowest anger ratings post-reappraisal. No distinct asymmetry pattern emerged for positive reinterpretation; however, this reappraisal condition yielded the lowest reappraisal success and lowest believability ratings. For all groups, higher reappraisal capacity correlated with right-lateralized frontal activity. Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry observed during reappraisal may be a specific function of implemented reappraisal strategy rather than general ideational fluency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Asymmetry in Cognitive and Behavioral Perception)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop