Next Article in Journal
Phenolics Profiling of Carpobrotus edulis (L.) N.E.Br. and Insights into Molecular Dynamics of Their Significance in Type 2 Diabetes Therapy and Its Retinopathy Complication
Next Article in Special Issue
Curcumin and Resveratrol Improve Muscle Function and Structure through Attenuation of Proteolytic Markers in Experimental Cancer-Induced Cachexia
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Anti-Alzheimer Agents from Guanidinyl Tryptophan Derivatives with Activities of Membrane Adhesion and Conformational Transition Inhibitions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Curcumin as Prospective Anti-Aging Natural Compound: Focus on Brain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Curcumin-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for the Prevention of the Biofilm-Associated Infections

1
Research Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET)—CNR, Via Castellino, 111, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
3
Elleva Pharma s.r.l., Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”, Largo Donegani, 2, 28100 Novara, Italy
5
Nice Filler s.r.l., Via Loggia dei Pisani, 25, 80133 Naples, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equally contributed.
Molecules 2021, 26(16), 4866; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164866
Submission received: 25 June 2021 / Revised: 28 July 2021 / Accepted: 8 August 2021 / Published: 11 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Health Benefits from Curcumin)

Abstract

:
Curcumin extracted from the rhizome of Curcuma Longa has been used in therapeutic preparations for centuries in different parts of the world. However, its bioactivity is limited by chemical instability, water insolubility, low bioavailability, and extensive metabolism. In this study, the coaxial electrospinning technique was used to produce both poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL)–curcumin and core–shell nanofibers composed of PCL and curcumin in the core and poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in the shell. Morphology and physical properties, as well as the release of curcumin were studied and compared with neat PCL, showing the formation of randomly oriented, defect-free cylindrical fibers with a narrow distribution of the dimensions. The antibacterial and antibiofilm potential, including the capacity to interfere with the quorum-sensing mechanism, was evaluated on Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, and Streptococcus mutans, two opportunistic pathogenic bacteria frequently associated with infections. The reported results demonstrated the ability of the Curcumin-loading membranes to inhibit both PAO1 and S. mutans biofilm growth and activity, thus representing a promising solution for the prevention of biofilm-associated infections. Moreover, the high biocompatibility and the ability to control the oxidative stress of damaged tissue, make the synthesized membranes useful as scaffolds in tissue engineering regeneration, helping to accelerate the healing process.

1. Introduction

Among natural compounds, curcumin (1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione), the main active components isolated from the rhizome of Curcuma Longa L., is well known for its beneficial effect on human health because of its outstanding anti-inflammatory [1], antioxidant [2], anticancer [3], wound healing [4,5], and antibacterial [6] properties. Despite these health-beneficial effects, curcumin exhibits poor bioavailability, photodegradation, and in vivo instability (i.e., low serum levels, limited tissue distribution, excessive metabolism, etc.) that limits its therapeutic efficacy. To date, there is a large body of published studies supporting the use of several nanoformulations to overcome these limitations [7,8,9].
In particular, electrospinning (ES) has emerged as a versatile technique for preparing nano and microfibers of natural and synthetic polymers. The electrospun fibers show fitness in diversified technological fields such as filtration, protective clothing, wound healing, and other biomedical applications [10,11,12,13]. In particular, the use of electrospun fibers is highly promising for scaffolds in tissue engineering and drug delivery [13,14,15,16,17]. High surface area, high drug loading capacity, porosity, simultaneous delivery of different therapeutic agents, adequate mechanical strength, and cost-effectiveness are appealing characteristics for use in drug delivery systems [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. In this context, the coaxial electrospinning technique, combining the properties from two different materials into a single core-sheath fiber, provides important and unique features relevant for biomedical applications [28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
The core–shell methodology might contribute to overcoming some challenges associated with electrospinning techniques (i.e., blending electrospinning, production of monolithic fibers, bilayer electrospinning) such as the incorporation of high compound loading, preservation of the activity and presence of burst effect. The use of core–shell structures allows for better tuning of the release kinetics by tailoring the thickness of shell polymer, which acts as a diffusion barrier for the compound loaded in the core as well as a protection of the active molecule from the sunlight or from microbiological attack for example. Then, coaxial fibers allow for the bioactive molecule to be located either in the core or shell layer in a simple one-step process and to modulate the thickness of fibrous material triggering the drug release kinetic [10]. Moreover, the drug release mechanism is mostly explained by the relative rates of erosion and diffusion of the entire fiber scaffold, hence the composition and the porosity of the single fibers can both modify this effect [35,36,37,38].
For these reasons, recently electrospinning technique was used in the treatment and prevention of biofilm-related infections, where the possibility to finely trigger the drug release may have a different impact on the bacterial/biofilm growth [39,40,41]. Biofilm is a complex multidimensional, self-sustained community of bacteria producing a matrix consisting of proteins, extracellular DNA, and polysaccharides, which are frequently associated with antibiotic resistance. Recently, several studies reported the use of electrospun fibers loaded with curcumin which ensure a controlled and sustained drug release in biomedical applications [5,42,43]. However, only a few papers described the fabrication and the application of coaxial electrospun mats loading curcumin [44,45]. Here we report the synthesis of coaxial membranes with two biodegradable polymers, poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly (lactic acid) (PLA), used for the core and shell and loaded with curcumin in the core. The antibacterial and antibiofilm potential was evaluated on Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, and Streptococcus mutans, two opportunistic pathogenic bacteria frequently associated with the infection of biomedical devices both in oral and in orthopedic implantology [46,47,48]. The Gram-negative bacterium PAO1 is responsible for several medical device-related infections (i.e., endocardial valve infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, etc.), causing approximately 80% of severe infections in immunocompromised patients, of which 25–60% fatal [46,49,50]. Streptococcus mutans, moreover, is a Gram-positive bacterium present in the oral cavity and is one of the major contributors to dental biofilms [51,52].
The results reported herein demonstrate the ability of the single-needle-spinned PCL-Cur and the coaxial membrane PCL-Cur/PLA (PCL in the core and PLA in the shell) to inhibit both PAO1 and S. mutans biofilm growth and activity. The high biocompatibility and the ability to control the oxidative stress of damaged tissue, make the synthesized membranes useful as scaffolds in tissue engineering regeneration, helping to accelerate the healing process and to prevent biofilm-associated infections.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphological Analysis

Electrospinning conditions were optimized to produce fibrous mats with bead-less fibers [53,54]. By adopting the chosen final parameters (as reported in the experimental part), fibers loaded with curcumin were successfully fabricated. Representative SEM photographs and the fiber diameter distribution of the electrospun membranes are shown in Figure 1.
As shown in Figure 1; curcumin loading did not noticeably affect the fiber morphology. The electrospinning of PCL led to the defection of free fibers, with a narrow fiber diameter distribution of 344 nm. Even in the case of coaxial fibers, the fibers are well-formed and almost free of defects. Their dimensions are slightly smaller than the neat PCL membrane and are very similar. In Figure 2, the TEM analysis shows the morphology of coaxial nanofibers where the inner and outer diameters made of PCL-Cur and PLA, respectively, are clearly evident.
It is evident that the core containing the drug is thicker than the shell of PLA; the PCL core is 286 nm, whereas the PLA shell is 60.5 nm.

2.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis was performed for investigating the degradation temperature of the coaxial fibers compared to the pure polymers. The thermal decomposition up to 700 °C in the air of the electrospun fibers, either PCL-Cur or coaxial PCL-Cur/PLA, are shown in Figure 3.
The degradation behavior of the coaxial membrane is higher than the PCL-Cur. This is due to the presence of PLA that shows lower thermal stability. Table 1 reports the degradation temperatures as the onset and endset of the coaxial fibers compared to the pure polymers.

2.3. Mechanical Characterization

The mechanical properties of PCL-Cur membranes were evaluated from stress–strain curves and compared to the coaxial system. The mechanical parameters are reported in Table 2.
Interestingly, the coaxial fibers show a higher mechanical modulus due to the strengthening of one material inside the other. At variance, the coaxial systems displayed a lower extensibility than PCL system as well as reduced stress at the breakpoint. This can be due to the dishomogeneity of the systems. However, the decrease of these parameters is not dramatic, and does not compromise the mechanical properties, also considering the increase of the elastic modulus.

2.4. Drug Release Analysis

As curcumin is poorly soluble in aqueous solutions, the release kinetic was determined in PBS/EtOH (90:10 v/v), a medium that facilitates the solubilization of the curcumin. As shown in Figure 4, PCL-Cur/PLA exhibited a significantly (p < 0.001) more sustained curcumin release, compared to PCL-Cur, after 2 h of incubation and throughout the experimental period.
Approximately 30 and 45% of the curcumin was released within the first 6 h from PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA, respectively, indicating that curcumin molecules weakly attached on the fiber surfaces have a high diffusion tendency. This initial burst release is followed by a slower and constant release, reaching 49 and 67.8% of a curcumin release after 72 h of incubation for PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA, respectively. From 72 h onwards, the release of curcumin reached a plateau, leveling off at around 52 and 69% for PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA, respectively (data not shown).
Moreover, the coaxial membrane PCL-Cur/PLA showed a higher curcumin loading efficiency in comparison to the PCL-Cur membrane, incorporating 70 ± 3% and 56 ± 2% of curcumin, respectively. The obtained data are in accordance with the literature, confirming the capacity of the coaxial spinning to load the drug and control the initial burst release more efficiently with respect to single-needle spinning [55,56]. Furthermore, the incorporation into the core–shell of the fiber is helpful to protect unstable active molecules from degradation, serving as a physical barrier [32,56].

2.5. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Analyses

Biofilm inhibition was analyzed at different times, as reported in Figure 5.
The results indicated a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in both PAO1 and S. mutans biofilm formation only for the PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA, according to the release study.
In particular, the major effect was observed for PCL-Cur/PLA membrane whit a reduction of 38 ± 3%, 47 ± 3% in PAO1 and S. mutans biofilm formation, respectively. During the first stage of biofilm formation, only PCL-Cur/PLA significantly inhibited biofilm formation, resulting in a reduction of 23 ± 5%, 33 ± 4% in PAO1 and S. mutans biofilm formation, respectively after 12 h of incubation.
Moreover, to better understand the mechanism of action of curcumin released from membranes in the inhibition of biofilm formation/maturation, the mRNA level of several genes involved in the quorum-sensing process was evaluated by q-PCR.
In general, QS is regulated by different autoinducer molecules in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [57]. Indeed, Gram-negative bacteria such as PAO1 during the QS process produce extracellular autoinducers such as N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone (3-O-C12-HSL) and N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL) that promote the transcription of virulence genes (i.e., exotoxin A, proteases, and rhamnolipids) [58,59]. Among them, rhamnolipids, which are of great importance acting as heat-stable extracellular hemolysins [60], are synthesized via rhlAB operon [61]. Conversely, Gram-positive bacteria such as S. mutans regulated the production of virulence factors via a two-component signal transduction system (TCSTS), consisting of a membrane-bound histidine kinase (HK) sensor protein, and a cognate cytoplasmic response regulator (RR) protein [62]. In S. mutans, the TCSTS consist principally in the operon ComAB/ComCDE where comC gene encodes competence-stimulating peptide (CSP), comD encodes HK sensor protein (ComD), and comE encodes an RR protein (ComE) [63].
As shown in Figure 6, both PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA significantly (p < 0.001) decreased the mRNA levels of all genes tested, compared to control (gene expression level in biofilm formed in the presence of PCL and PLA membranes). In particular, for PAO1, the relative expression levels of the virulence genes rhlA, and rhlB were significantly decreased by 0.85-, and 0.83-fold, respectively, after 6 h of incubation in the presence of PCL-Cur, while by 0.72- and 0.73-fold after 6 h of incubation in the presence of PCL-Cur/PLA. This reduction was more evident after 24 h of incubation, reaching a downregulation of 0.67- and 0.53-fold for PCL-Cur and 0.53- and 49-fold for PCL-Cur/PLA. The same behavior was observed for S. mutans biofilm, where the treatment with PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA for 6 h repressed the relative expression levels of comC and comD to 77% and 72% (PCL-Cur), and 37% and 49% (PCL-Cur/PLA), respectively, as compared to control values. After 24 h of incubation, only the relative expression level of com D significantly (p < 0.001) was downregulated, reaching a 29% decrease compared to control for PCL-CUR/PLA.
Antimicrobial activity was then analyzed at 6 and 24 h in the presence of prepared membranes. As reported in Figure 7, the antibacterial evaluation demonstrated that the electrospun membranes did not have a noticeable effect on both the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and the Streptococcus mutans growth curves.
The reported results demonstrated that the curcumin released from electrospun membranes is able to affect biofilm formation without interfering with bacterial growth.

2.6. Determination of DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

Inflammation represents an adaptive physiological response to external and/or internal deleterious circumstances, including infection and tissue injuries. Extensive studies have suggested that continuous oxidative stress activates the inflammatory signaling cascade producing new free radicals that, in turn, lead to further oxidative stress, thus creating a cycle. This altered status can cause various chronic diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, metabolic disorders, and so on [64,65]. Among the numerous phytochemicals, curcumin exhibited anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antitumor effects both on in vitro and in vivo models of human diseases [66]. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidative activity of curcumin is mostly related to the regulation of the NF-κB (nuclear factor k-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) pathway and the inhibition of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [67]. Other studies reported the involvement of curcumin in the increase of reactive oxidative species (ROS) and glutathione production and inhibition of lipid peroxidation activity [68]. It has been suggested that the antioxidant activity of curcumin can be attributed either to the phenolic OH group or the CH2 group of the β-diketone moiety [69,70]. Indeed, the radical scavenging activity of curcumin is 100-fold stronger than that of vitamin E or C both in vitro and in vivo [71].
The ability of curcumin released from membranes to produces an antioxidant effect was evaluated by the DPPH radical scavenging assay, a simple and highly sensitive method to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity of antioxidants [72].
As reported in Figure 8, a decrease in the concentration of DPPH radical was shown due to the scavenging ability of curcumin released from both PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur/PLA. However, the PCL-Cur/PLA coaxial membrane showed a significantly higher antioxidant activity with respect to PCL-Cur after 8, 24 and 48 h of immersion. No effect was observed in the presence of PLA-Cur and PLA-Cur/PCL membranes. Moreover, the results indicated that a longer immersion period (48 h) led to a reduction of antioxidant activity, likely due to decreasing stability of curcumin in alcohol solution.

2.7. Membranes Biocompatibility

To investigate the effect of curcumin extract on viability, human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were chosen as in vitro cell models. The results depicted in Figure 9 demonstrated that the extracts obtained in culture medium from all synthesized membranes did not elicit any cytotoxic effect. In particular, no influence on HDF metabolic activity was reported even after 72 h of incubation (Figure 9A). In addition, the low LDH level in the cell supernatant confirms the absence of cell membrane damage (Figure 9B).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the fabricated membranes could be employed as scaffolds in tissue engineering regeneration to control the oxidative stress of damaged tissue, helping to accelerates the healing process.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL molecular weight of 80,000 Da) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich while poly (l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) (PLA 4032 D-Mw = 160,000 g/mol) was purchased from NatureWorks (Minnetonka, MN, USA). Tetrahydrofuran (THF pure-CAS: 109-99-9), Ethanol (EtOH purity > 96%-CAS 64-17-5) and Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS-pH = 7 ± 0.02-CAS: 7558-79-4) were purchased from Carlo Erba Reagents (Cornaredo-Milano). N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF-CAS 68-12-2) and Curcumin (Cur) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and Lactate dehydrogenase assay were from Roche Applied Science (Milan, Italy). Human dermal fibroblasts were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection ATCC (LGC Standards S.R.L., Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy) and cultured in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin were purchased from Hyclone (Milan, Italy).

3.2. Preparation of Curcumin-Loaded Membranes Using Electrospinning

The electrospinning membranes were prepared by dissolving PCL and PLA in a solvent mixture THF/DMF (50:50 v/v) at 12% w/w. Curcumin was added to PCL solution at the drug to polymer ratio of 0.1:9.9 (w/w) and mixed for 4 h at 40 °C using a temperature-controlled stirring plate (300 rpm) to obtain a homogenous solution. Coaxial electrospun membranes were obtained by using a coaxial nozzle (EM-CAX-Ime electrospinning). Two separate volumetric pumps were used to process the polymeric solutions, prepared as previously described. The curcumin-loaded coaxial nanofibrous mats were processed by coaxial electrospinning; the drug-loaded solution constitutes the inner core, while the no-loaded solution is the outer shell. Before performing the experiment, each solution was fed in a 5 mL syringe pump. The sets of electrospinning conditions were reported in Table 3 and optimized to produce nanofibrous mats without bead formation [44]. Temperature and relative humidity were fixed for all the experiments and equal to 25 °C and 35%, respectively. The produced composite nanofibrous mats were marked as PCL-Cur and PCL-Cur (core)/PLA (shell).
A climate-controlled electrospinning apparatus EC-CLI (IME Technologies, WG Waalre, The Netherlands) was used to produce fibrous membranes. The vertical setup was chosen to carry out the experiments. Core–shell nanofibers were obtained through a coaxial apparatus containing two concentric needles. The diameters of the inner and outer needles were 0.8 mm and 1.2 mm, respectively. The inner needle was 0.20 mm longer than the outer needle. For all the experiments, an aluminum collector was used to recover the electrospun nanofibers.

3.3. Morphological Analises

3.3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM was carried out using a Quanta 200 F microscope (Thermo Fischer, Hillsboro, OR, USA) in high-vacuum mode. Before the analysis, electrospun membranes were covered with a thin film of gold using an Agar Automatic Sputter Coater (Mod. B7341, Stansted, UK) at 40 mA for 120 s prior to the analysis.

3.3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM was performed on a FEI Tecnai 200 kV electron microscope (Thermo Fischer, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operating at 100 keV. The samples for the TEM observation were prepared by directly depositing the as-spun fibers onto the copper grids.

3.4. Structural Characterization of Electrospinning Nanofibers

3.4.1. Thermogravimetric Analyses (TGA)

TGA were carried out in an air atmosphere with a Mettler TC-10 thermobalance (Mettler Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland) from 25 °C to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

3.4.2. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical properties were evaluated, in tensile mode, at room temperature using a dynamometric apparatus INSTRON 4301 (ITW Test and Measurement Italia S.r.l., Pianezza, Italy). Experiments were conducted at room temperature with a deformation rate of 5 mm/min. Elastic modulus was evaluated in the deformation range of 0.1%. Data were averaged on five samples.

3.5. Curcumin Entrapment Efficiency

Square pieces of membranes (ca. 2 cm2) were weighted and dissolved in methanol (1:5 w/v) for 60 min and curcumin concentration was measured as reported above by HPLC. The curcumin loading efficiency (LE) was calculated as percentage respect to the loaded drug as follows:
LE   % = curcumin   concentration curcumin   concentration   initially   added   in   the   polymer   solution × 100

3.6. In Vitro Release Kinetic Measurement

The release of the curcumin from the membranes was determined as early described with some modifications [73]. Briefly, square pieces of membranes (ca. 2 cm2) were weighed and placed into individual amber vials. Considering the very low solubility of the curcumin in aqueous solutions, the release kinetic was performed at 37 °C in PBS/EtOH (90:10 v/v). At predetermined time intervals (every hour for 6 h, then at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h), supernatants were withdrawn, and the same amount of fresh solution was added back to the release medium. The curcumin concentration was measured using HPLC-UV with a linear elution gradient consisting of mobile phase A (0.1% acetic acid), B (Acetonitrile), and C (Methanol). The detection wavelength was set at 420 nm and Curcumin quantitation was based on a standard curve in PBS/EtOH (90:10 v/v). System control and data acquisition were performed using ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies). The results were presented in terms of cumulative release (percentage with respect to the loaded drug) as a function of time.

3.7. Antioxidant Activity

Antioxidant activity, as the free radical-scavenging ability of curcumin-loaded nanofibers, was examined using 1,1-dipheny-l-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) assay as reported by Amrati et al. with slight modifications [74]. Samples of square pieces of membranes (ca. 1.5 × 2 cm) were dissolved in PBS/EtOH (90:10 v/v) for 0.5, 1, 8, 24 and 48 h and then ultrasonicated for 15 min. The dilution of the solutions was done in PBS/EtOH (90:10 v/v). Aliquots (500 μL) of those solutions were added to 2 mL of DPPH methanolic solution (60 μM) and kept in the dark at 37 °C for 1 h. The absorbance of the samples was determined at 517 nm using a microplate reader (Cytation 3, ASHI). A methanolic solution of free curcumin and polymers was used as a control. The percentage of inhibition of DPPH was calculated as follows:
DPPH scavenging effect (%) = [(A1 − A0)/A1] × 100
where A1 was the absorbance of the control (DPPH solution without sample) at 517; A0 was the absorbance at 517 of the sample at different concentrations with DPPH. The antioxidant activity was expressed as % with respect to free curcumin.

3.8. Citotoxicity

3.8.1. Cell Proliferation Assay

Indirect cytotoxicity evaluation of curcumin-loaded membranes was conducted according to ISO 10993-5 standard test method as reported by Conte et al. with slight modifications [75]. Samples in a circular shape (1.5 cm in diameter) were exposed to UV radiation for 30 min for sterilization. Then, the samples were immersed in 10 v/v % serum containing DMEM medium for 24 h at 37 °C to produce the sample extraction. Human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were cultured in 96-well tissue-culture polystyrene plate (TCPS) at 2 × 103 cells/well in serum-containing DMEM for 16 h to allow cell attachment. After that, the medium was replaced with an extraction medium and HDFs were incubated for a further 12, 24 and 48 h. At the end of the incubation period, all CCK-8 solutions were added to each well, and the plate was then incubated under cell culture conditions for 1–4 h. The optical density of formazan salt at 450 nm was measured using a Citation 3 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode microplate reader (ASHI, Milan, Italy). The cytocompatibility of the membranes was expressed as a percentage relative to the control and calculated as:
Cytocompatibility (%) = (OD sample/OD control) × 100
where OD sample is the optical density of cells treated with curcumin extract and OD control is the optical density of untreated cells.

3.8.2. LDH Release Assay

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release measurements were based on the measurement of lactate LDH released into the growth media when the integrity of the cell membrane is lost. For this assay, HDF cells were treated with extracts in the same way as described above. At the end of the incubation time, 100 μL of the culture supernatants were collected to a well, and LDH activity was detected at 450 nm as reported by manufacturing protocol. As a positive control, cells were completely lysed with Triton X-100, according to Calarco et al. [76].

3.9. Antimicrobial Activity

3.9.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (ATCC® BAA-47™) and Streptococcus mutans (ATCC® 25175) were purchased from ATCC, and cultured following the ATCC’s guidelines.

3.9.2. Antibacterial Activity

The capability of the curcumin-loaded membranes to inhibit bacterial growth was determined by monitoring the optical density (OD) at 600 nm of bacterial suspensions cultured in the presence of both PCL-Cur and coaxial PCL-Cur/PLA. All mats were cut of similar dimension, sterilized by UV radiation for 15 min at each side, and finally placed in a 12-well plate in the presence of 500 µL liquid broth as previously described [77]. Briefly, bacteria were inoculated approximately at 1 × 107 CFU/mL and incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm in a microplate reader (Cytation 3). As a control, the growth curve was obtained in the presence of PCL mat. At scheduled times (6 h or 24 h), the optical density (OD) at 600 nm was recorded.

3.9.3. Biofilm Analysis

To investigate the ability of the curcumin-loaded membranes to inhibit the biofilm formation, a similar amount of PCL-Cur, and PCL-Cur/PLA were sterilized by UV radiation for 15 min at each side, placed in a 48-well polystyrene plate, and biofilm developed as described by Di Salle et al. with some modifications [78]. Briefly, 750 µL of liquid medium broth containing 1 × 107 CFU/mL of S. mutans or PAO1 were added and the cultures were incubated statically at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere. PLA or PCL mats incubated in liquid medium broth were used as a negative control, while 750 µL of PAO1 (1 × 107 CFU/mL) or S. mutans (1 × 107 CFU/mL) were used as positive controls.
The surface-adhered biofilm was quantified after 6, 12, and 24 h by the Crystal Violet (CV) assay. Each well was washed gently with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and air-dried for 30 min. Then, a solution of 0.1% w/v Crystal Violet was added to each well. After 30 min, excess solution was removed, and any extra stain was removed by washing with PBS. The stained biofilms were solubilized in 96% ethanol and quantified by measuring the optical density (OD) at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Cytation 3, AHSI, Milan, Italy). Measurements were carried out in triplicate for each membrane.

3.9.4. Quorum Sensing (QS) Interfering

To determine the ability of the membranes to interfere with the quorum-sensing mechanism underlying the biofilm maturation process, the mRNA level of rhlAB genes for PAO1 and of comCD genes for S. mutans was quantified by real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). PAO1 and S. mutans biofilms were developed in the presence of synthesized membranes for 6 or 24 h, as previously described in a 48-well polystyrene plate. The bacterial pellet was then collected by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 10 min, and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Italy) as previously described [79]. Briefly, 0.2 μg of total RNA was retrotranscripted using AMV Reverse Transcriptase and random hexamers according to the provider’s instruction (Promega, Milan, Italy). The resulting mixture was amplified by qRT-PCR using specific primers based on the previous literature as listed in Table 4.
qPCR and data collection were performed on 7900HT Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Milan, Italy). The reactions were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen, Italy). All reactions were run in triplicate, normalized to the housekeeping gene (16SrRNA), and the results expressed as mean ±SD. The comparative cycle threshold (2−ΔΔCt) method was used to determine the relative quantification.

3.10. Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as mean ±  standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was used for the curcumin release. For biochemical, antimicrobial investigations assay, and quantitative real-time PCR one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for statistical comparison. The difference was regarded as statistically significant when p < 0.05. All the data were analyzed with the GraphPad Prism version 6.01 statistical software package (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

4. Conclusions

In this study, electrospinning was used to produce nanofibrous membranes with the ability to release curcumin in a continuous and sustainable mode, eliciting both antibacterial and antibiofilm activity on Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Streptococcus mutans—two opportunistic bacteria frequently associated with human infections. In particular, we observed a more important effect, especially after 12 h of incubation, with the coaxial respect to the single-needle electrospun membrane, showing a reduction of 23 ± 5%, 33 ± 4% in PAO1 and S. mutans biofilm formation, respectively. Our data also demonstrated the ability of CUR-loading membranes to inhibit signal-based biofilm formation, lowering the expression of several genes involved in the quorum-sensing mechanism that led to biofilm maturation.
Moreover, the presented results demonstrated good biocompatibility of both PCL-Cur, and PCL-Cur/PLA and a good antioxidant capacity already after 30 min of incubation.
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the fabricated membranes could be employed as scaffolds in tissue engineering regeneration to control the oxidative stress of damaged tissue, thus helping to accelerates the healing process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C., A.D.S. and G.G.; investigation, G.V., A.V., F.D.C. and E.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G., A.D.S., G.P., V.V. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, G.G., A.D.S., G.P., V.V. and A.C.; supervision, A.D.S., G.G. and A.C.; funding acquisition, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the PON 03 PE_00110_1/ptd1_000410 Titolo: Sviluppo di nanotecnologie Orientate alla Rigenerazione e Ricostruzione tissutale, Implantologia e Sensoristica in Odontoiatria/oculistica (SORRISO).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Orsolina Petillo for her technical support and editorial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not available.

References

  1. Hasanzadeh, S.; Read, M.I.; Bland, A.R.; Majeed, M.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Curcumin: An inflammasome silencer. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 159, 104921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Banez, M.J.; Geluz, M.I.; Chandra, A.; Hamdan, T.; Biswas, O.S.; Bryan, N.S.; Von Schwarz, E.R. A systemic review on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of resveratrol, curcumin, and dietary nitric oxide supplementation on human cardiovascular health. Nutr. Res. 2020, 78, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. D’Arcy, M.S. A review of the chemopreventative and chemotherapeutic properties of the phytochemicals berberine, resveratrol and curcumin, and their influence on cell death via the pathways of apoptosis and autophagy. Cell Biol. Int. 2020, 44, 1781–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barbalho, S.M.; de Sousa Gonzaga, H.F.; de Souza, G.A.; de Alvares Goulart, R.; de Sousa Gonzaga, M.L.; de Alvarez Rezende, B. Dermatological effects of Curcuma species: A systematic review. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2021, 46, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alven, S.; Nqoro, X.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Polymer-Based Materials Loaded with Curcumin for Wound Healing Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zheng, D.; Huang, C.; Huang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Khan, M.R.U.; Zhao, H.; Huang, L. Antibacterial Mechanism of Curcumin: A Review. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Basu, P.; Maier, C.; Basu, A. Effects of Curcumin and Its Different Formulations in Preclinical and Clinical Studies of Peripheral Neuropathic and Postoperative Pain: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hesari, M.; Mohammadi, P.; Khademi, F.; Shackebaei, D.; Momtaz, S.; Moasefi, N.; Farzaei, M.H.; Abdollahi, M. Current Advances in the Use of Nanophytomedicine Therapies for Human Cardiovascular Diseases. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 3293–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mahjoob, M.; Stochaj, U. Curcumin nanoformulations to combat aging-related diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021, 69, 101364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, H.; Gough, C.R.; Deng, Q.; Gu, Z.; Wang, F.; Hu, X. Recent Advances in Electrospun Sustainable Composites for Biomedical, Environmental, Energy, and Packaging Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Croitoru, A.M.; Ficai, D.; Ficai, A.; Mihailescu, N.; Andronescu, E.; Turculet, C.F. Nanostructured Fibers Containing Natural or Synthetic Bioactive Compounds in Wound Dressing Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luo, H.; Jie, T.; Zheng, L.; Huang, C.; Chen, G.; Cui, W. Electrospun Nanofibers for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1295, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dziemidowicz, K.; Sang, Q.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Lagaron, J.M.; Mo, X.; Parker, G.J.M.; Yu, D.G.; Zhu, L.M.; et al. Electrospinning for healthcare: Recent advancements. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tottoli, E.M.; Dorati, R.; Genta, I.; Chiesa, E.; Pisani, S.; Conti, B. Skin Wound Healing Process and New Emerging Technologies for Skin Wound Care and Regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deng, X.; Qasim, M.; Ali, A. Engineering and polymeric composition of drug-eluting suture: A review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jeckson, T.A.; Neo, Y.P.; Sisinthy, S.P.; Gorain, B. Delivery of Therapeutics from Layer-by-Layer Electrospun Nanofiber Matrix for Wound Healing: An Update. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 110, 635–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luraghi, A.; Peri, F.; Moroni, L. Electrospinning for drug delivery applications: A review. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2021, 334, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elsner, J.J.; Egozi, D.; Ullmann, Y.; Berdicevsky, I.; Shefy-Peleg, A.; Zilberman, M. Novel biodegradable composite wound dressings with controlled release of antibiotics: Results in a guinea pig burn model. Burns 2011, 37, 896–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elsner, J.J.; Zilberman, M. Antibiotic-eluting bioresorbable composite fibers for wound healing applications: Microstructure, drug delivery and mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 2872–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, S.-J.; Kau, Y.-C.; Chou, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-K.; Wu, R.-C.; Yeh, W.-L. Electrospun PLGA/collagen nanofibrous membrane as early-stage wound dressing. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 355, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, Z.X.; Xu, X.X.; Zheng, W.; Zhou, H.M.; Li, L.; Zheng, Y.F.; Lou, X. Preparation and characterization of electrospun PLGA/gelatin nanofibers as a potential drug delivery system. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 84, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Noh, H.K.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, J.-M.; Oh, J.-E.; Kim, K.-H.; Chung, C.-P.; Choi, S.-C.; Park, W.H.; Min, B.-M. Electrospinning of chitin nanofibers: Degradation behavior and cellular response to normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3934–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Powell, H.M.; Supp, D.M.; Boyce, S.T. Influence of electrospun collagen on wound contraction of engineered skin substitutes. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rho, K.S.; Jeong, L.; Lee, G.; Seo, B.-M.; Park, Y.J.; Hong, S.-D.; Roh, S.; Cho, J.J.; Park, W.H.; Min, B.-M. Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers: Effects on the behavior of normal human keratinocytes and early-stage wound healing. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 1452–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Teo, E.Y.; Ong, S.-Y.; Khoon Chong, M.S.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, J.; Moochhala, S.; Ho, B.; Teoh, S.-H. Polycaprolactone-based fused deposition modeled mesh for delivery of antibacterial agents to infected wounds. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thangaraju, E.; Rajiv, S.; Natarajan, T.S. Comparison of preparation and characterization of water-bath collected porous poly L –lactide microfibers and cellulose/silk fibroin based poly L-lactide nanofibers for biomedical applications. J. Polym. Res. 2015, 22, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Uttayarat, P.; Jetawattana, S.; Suwanmala, P.; Eamsiri, J.; Tangthong, T.; Pongpat, S. Antimicrobial electrospun silk fibroin mats with silver nanoparticles for wound dressing application. Fibers Polym. 2012, 13, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alharbi, H.F.; Luqman, M.; Khalil, K.A.; Elnakady, Y.A.; Abd-Elkader, O.H.; Rady, A.M.; Alharthi, N.H.; Karim, M.R. Fabrication of core-shell structured nanofibers of poly (lactic acid) and poly (vinyl alcohol) by coaxial electrospinning for tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 98, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khalf, A.; Madihally, S.V. Recent advances in multiaxial electrospinning for drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 112, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. McCann, J.T.; Li, D.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers with core-sheath, hollow, or porous structures. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 735–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Naeimirad, M.; Zadhoush, A.; Kotek, R.; Esmaeely Neisiany, R.; Nouri Khorasani, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Recent advances in core/shell bicomponent fibers and nanofibers: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sultanova, Z.; Kaleli, G.; Kabay, G.; Mutlu, M. Controlled release of a hydrophilic drug from coaxially electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 505, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Windbergs, M. Controlled dual drug release by coaxial electrospun fibers—Impact of the core fluid on drug encapsulation and release. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 556, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, X.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Jing, X. Biodegradable electrospun poly(l-lactide) fibers containing antibacterial silver nanoparticles. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 2081–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yakoub, L.K.; Mohammad, F.K. Medetomidine protection against diazinon-induced toxicosis in mice. Toxicol. Lett. 1997, 93, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gopferich, A.; Langer, R. Modeling of polymer erosion. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 4105–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reynolds, T.D.; Gehrke, S.H.; Ajaz, S.H.; Shenouda, L.S. Polymer Erosion and Drug Release Characterization of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Matrices. J. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 87, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tamada, J.A.; Langer, R. Erosion kinetics of hydrolytically degradable polymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Preem, L.; Mahmoudzadeh, M.; Putrinš, M.; Meos, A.; Laidmäe, I.; Romann, T.; Aruväli, J.; Härmas, R.; Koivuniemi, A.; Bunker, A.; et al. Interactions between Chloramphenicol, Carrier Polymers, and Bacteria–Implications for Designing Electrospun Drug Delivery Systems Countering Wound Infection. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 4417–4430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Preem, L.; Bock, F.; Hinnu, M.; Putrinš, M.; Sagor, K.; Tenson, T.; Meos, A.; Østergaard, J.; Kogermann, K. Monitoring of Antimicrobial Drug Chloramphenicol Release from Electrospun Nano- and Microfiber Mats Using UV Imaging and Bacterial Bioreporters. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Zupančič, Š.; Preem, L.; Kristl, J.; Putrinš, M.; Tenson, T.; Kocbek, P.; Kogermann, K. Impact of PCL nanofiber mat structural properties on hydrophilic drug release and antibacterial activity on periodontal pathogens. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 122, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Agarwal, Y.; Rajinikanth, P.S.; Ranjan, S.; Tiwari, U.; Balasubramnaiam, J.; Pandey, P.; Arya, D.K.; Anand, S.; Deepak, P. Curcumin loaded polycaprolactone-/polyvinyl alcohol-silk fibroin based electrospun nanofibrous mat for rapid healing of diabetic wound: An in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 176, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shababdoust, A.; Ehsani, M.; Shokrollahi, P.; Zandi, M. Fabrication of curcumin-loaded electrospun nanofiberous polyurethanes with anti-bacterial activity. Prog. Biomater. 2018, 7, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Llorens, E.; Ibañez, H.; Del Valle, L.J.; Puiggalí, J. Biocompatibility and drug release behavior of scaffolds prepared by coaxial electrospinning of poly(butylene succinate) and polyethylene glycol. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2015, 49, 472–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sharifisamani, E.; Mousazadegan, F.; Bagherzadeh, R.; Latifi, M. PEG-PLA-PCL based electrospun yarns with curcumin control release property as suture. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 1520–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Canullo, L.; Rossetti, P.H.; Penarrocha, D. Identification of Enterococcus Faecalis and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa on and in Implants in Individuals with Peri-implant Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2015, 30, 583–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kaur, G.; Rajesh, S.; Princy, S.A. Plausible Drug Targets in the Streptococcus mutans Quorum Sensing Pathways to Combat Dental Biofilms and Associated Risks. Indian J. Microbiol. 2015, 55, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Persson, G.R.; Renvert, S. Cluster of Bacteria Associated with Peri-Implantitis. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2014, 16, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maurice, N.M.; Bedi, B.; Sadikot, R.T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Host Response and Clinical Implications in Lung Infections. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 58, 428–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pericolini, E.; Colombari, B.; Ferretti, G.; Iseppi, R.; Ardizzoni, A.; Girardis, M.; Sala, A.; Peppoloni, S.; Blasi, E. Real-time monitoring of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on endotracheal tubes in vitro. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Astasov-Frauenhoffer, M.; Kulik, E.M. Cariogenic Biofilms and Caries from Birth to Old Age. Monogr. Oral Sci. 2021, 29, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koo, H.; Xiao, J.; Klein, M.I.; Jeon, J.G. Exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases modulate the establishment of microcolonies within multispecies biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 3024–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Qin, X.-H.; Wang, S.-Y. Filtration properties of electrospinning nanofibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 102, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Viscusi, G.; Lamberti, E.; Vittoria, V.; Gorrasi, G. Coaxial electrospun membranes of poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(lactic acid) with reverse core-shell structures loaded with curcumin as tunable drug delivery systems. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kabay, G.; Demirci, C.; Kaleli Can, G.; Meydan, A.E.; Daşan, B.G.; Mutlu, M. A comparative study of single-needle and coaxial electrospun amyloid-like protein nanofibers to investigate hydrophilic drug release behavior. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 114, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.J. Drug Delivery Applications of Core-Sheath Nanofibers Prepared by Coaxial Electrospinning: A Review. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Rocha, F.R.; Regis, W.F.M.; Duarte, S.; Muniz, F.W.M.G.; Rodrigues, L.K.A. Effect of bioactive compounds on the regulation of quorum sensing network-associated genes and virulence in Streptococcus mutans—A systematic review. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020, 119, 104893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. O’Loughlin, C.T.; Miller, L.C.; Siryaporn, A.; Drescher, K.; Semmelhack, M.F.; Bassler, B.L. A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Pesci, E.C.; Pearson, J.P.; Seed, P.C.; Iglewski, B.H. Regulation of las and rhl quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 3127–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Soberón-Chávez, G.; Lépine, F.; Déziel, E. Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 68, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhu, K.; Rock, C.O. RhlA converts beta-hydroxyacyl-acyl carrier protein intermediates in fatty acid synthesis to the beta-hydroxydecanoyl-beta-hydroxydecanoate component of rhamnolipids in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 3147–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Li, Y.-H.; Tian, X.-L.; Layton, G.; Norgaard, C.; Sisson, G. Additive attenuation of virulence and cariogenic potential of Streptococcus mutans by simultaneous inactivation of the ComCDE quorum-sensing system and HK/RR11 two-component regulatory system. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3256–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Li, Y.-H.; Lau Peter, C.Y.; Lee Janet, H.; Ellen Richard, P.; Cvitkovitch Dennis, G. Natural Genetic Transformation ofStreptococcus mutans Growing in Biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Aggarwal, B.B.; Harikumar, K.B. Potential therapeutic effects of curcumin, the anti-inflammatory agent, against neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, autoimmune and neoplastic diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41, 40–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Xu, X.-Y.; Meng, X.; Li, S.; Gan, R.-Y.; Li, Y.; Li, H.-B. Bioactivity, Health Benefits, and Related Molecular Mechanisms of Curcumin: Current Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sreedhar, R.; Arumugam, S.; Thandavarayan, R.A.; Karuppagounder, V.; Watanabe, K. Curcumin as a therapeutic agent in the chemoprevention of inflammatory bowel disease. Drug Discov. Today 2016, 21, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Willenbacher, E.; Khan, S.Z.; Mujica, S.C.; Trapani, D.; Hussain, S.; Wolf, D.; Willenbacher, W.; Spizzo, G.; Seeber, A. Erratum: Willenbacher, E.; et al. Curcumin: New Insights into an Ancient Ingredient against Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Biswas, S.K.; McClure, D.; Jimenez, L.A.; Megson, I.L.; Rahman, I. Curcumin Induces Glutathione Biosynthesis and Inhibits NF-κB Activation and Interleukin-8 Release in Alveolar Epithelial Cells: Mechanism of Free Radical Scavenging Activity. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2004, 7, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Portes, E.; Gardrat, C.; Castellan, A. A comparative study on the antioxidant properties of tetrahydrocurcuminoids and curcuminoids. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9092–9099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Priyadarsini, K.I.; Maity, D.K.; Naik, G.H.; Kumar, M.S.; Unnikrishnan, M.K.; Satav, J.G.; Mohan, H. Role of phenolic O-H and methylene hydrogen on the free radical reactions and antioxidant activity of curcumin. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ruby, A.J.; Kuttan, G.; Dinesh Babu, K.; Rajasekharan, K.N.; Kuttan, R. Anti-tumour and antioxidant activity of natural curcuminoids. Cancer Lett. 1995, 94, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Saeed, N.; Khan, M.R.; Shabbir, M. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of whole plant extracts Torilis leptophylla L. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Riccitiello, F.; De Luise, A.; Conte, R.; D’Aniello, S.; Vittoria, V.; Di Salle, A.; Calarco, A.; Peluso, G. Effect of resveratrol release kinetic from electrospun nanofibers on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 99, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Amrati, F.e.-z.; Bourhia, M.; Slighoua, M.; Ibnemoussa, S.; Bari, A.; Ullah, R.; Amaghnouje, A.; Di Cristo, F.; El Mzibri, M.; Calarco, A.; et al. Phytochemical Study on Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities of Moroccan Caralluma europaea Extract and Its Bioactive Compound Classes. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 8409718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Conte, R.; Valentino, A.; Di Cristo, F.; Peluso, G.; Cerruti, P.; Di Salle, A.; Calarco, A. Cationic Polymer Nanoparticles-Mediated Delivery of miR-124 Impairs Tumorigenicity of Prostate Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Calarco, A.; Bosetti, M.; Margarucci, S.; Fusaro, L.; Nicolì, E.; Petillo, O.; Cannas, M.; Galderisi, U.; Peluso, G. The genotoxicity of PEI-based nanoparticles is reduced by acetylation of polyethylenimine amines in human primary cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 218, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bonadies, I.; Di Cristo, F.; Valentino, A.; Peluso, G.; Calarco, A.; Di Salle, A. pH-Responsive Resveratrol-Loaded Electrospun Membranes for the Prevention of Implant-Associated Infections. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Di Salle, A.; Spagnuolo, G.; Conte, R.; Procino, A.; Peluso, G.; Rengo, C. Effects of various prophylactic procedures on titanium surfaces and biofilm formation. J. Periodontal Implant. Sci. 2018, 48, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Calarco, A.; Di Salle, A.; Tammaro, L.; De Luca, I.; Mucerino, S.; Petillo, O.; Riccitiello, F.; Vittoria, V.; Peluso, G. Long-Term Fluoride Release from Dental Resins Affects STRO-1+ Cell Behavior. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Prateeksha; Rao, C.V.; Das, A.K.; Barik, S.K.; Singh, B.N. ZnO/Curcumin Nanocomposites for Enhanced Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence via LasR-RhlR Quorum Sensing Systems. Mol. Pharm. 2019, 16, 3399–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, B.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; Zhou, Y. Curcumin as a Promising Antibacterial Agent: Effects on Metabolism and Biofilm Formation in S. mutans. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 4508709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Wang, C.; Hou, J.; van der Mei, H.C.; Busscher, H.J.; Ren, Y. Emergent Properties in Streptococcus mutans Biofilms Are Controlled through Adhesion Force Sensing by Initial Colonizers. mBio 2019, 10, e01908-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Lenz Ailyn, P.; Williamson Kerry, S.; Pitts, B.; Stewart Philip, S.; Franklin Michael, J. Localized Gene Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4463–4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. SEM photographs of (a) PCL; (b) PCL-PLA; (c) PCL-Cur; (d) PCL-Cur/PLA; (e) fiber distribution of PCL-Cur and (f) fiber distribution of PCL-Cur/PLA.
Figure 1. SEM photographs of (a) PCL; (b) PCL-PLA; (c) PCL-Cur; (d) PCL-Cur/PLA; (e) fiber distribution of PCL-Cur and (f) fiber distribution of PCL-Cur/PLA.
Molecules 26 04866 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of PCL-Cur/PLA fiber.
Figure 2. TEM images of PCL-Cur/PLA fiber.
Molecules 26 04866 g002
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric analysis of PCL-Cur, PCL-Cur/PLA and PLA.
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric analysis of PCL-Cur, PCL-Cur/PLA and PLA.
Molecules 26 04866 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative curcumin release kinetic release profiles at 37 °C of PCL, and PCL-Cur/PLA incubated for 72 h in release medium (PBS/EtOH 90:10 v/v). For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD). Statistically significant variations: ### p < 0.001 versus PCL-CUR.
Figure 4. Cumulative curcumin release kinetic release profiles at 37 °C of PCL, and PCL-Cur/PLA incubated for 72 h in release medium (PBS/EtOH 90:10 v/v). For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD). Statistically significant variations: ### p < 0.001 versus PCL-CUR.
Molecules 26 04866 g004
Figure 5. Antibiofilm activity of curcumin-loading membranes. Biofilm formation was evaluated by CV assay, after 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation at 37 °C in the presence of PAO1 (A), and Streptococcus mutans (B) as described in the material and methods section. Biofilm formation was reported as a percentage in comparison to the maximum amount of biofilm produced by PAO1 and Streptococcus mutans grown (bacterial positive controls). For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD). Statistically significant variations: *** p < 0.001 versus PCL and PLA; ### p < 0.001 versus PCL-Cur.
Figure 5. Antibiofilm activity of curcumin-loading membranes. Biofilm formation was evaluated by CV assay, after 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation at 37 °C in the presence of PAO1 (A), and Streptococcus mutans (B) as described in the material and methods section. Biofilm formation was reported as a percentage in comparison to the maximum amount of biofilm produced by PAO1 and Streptococcus mutans grown (bacterial positive controls). For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD). Statistically significant variations: *** p < 0.001 versus PCL and PLA; ### p < 0.001 versus PCL-Cur.
Molecules 26 04866 g005
Figure 6. Evaluation of the effect of the CUR-loaded membranes on the expression of QS-related genes. (A) Relative RNA expression of rhlA and rhlB in PAO1; (B) relative RNA expression of comC and comD in S. mutans. Different gene expression levels were normalized to the level of 16sRNA gene transcripts. Gene expression levels of biofilm formed in the presence of PCL were used as control. Statistically significant variations: * p < 0.05 versus PCL and PLA; ** p < 0.01 versus PCL and PLA; *** p < 0.001 versus PCL and PLA; # p < 0.05 versus PCL-CUR; ## p < 0.01 versus PCL-CUR; ### p < 0.001 versus PCL-CUR.
Figure 6. Evaluation of the effect of the CUR-loaded membranes on the expression of QS-related genes. (A) Relative RNA expression of rhlA and rhlB in PAO1; (B) relative RNA expression of comC and comD in S. mutans. Different gene expression levels were normalized to the level of 16sRNA gene transcripts. Gene expression levels of biofilm formed in the presence of PCL were used as control. Statistically significant variations: * p < 0.05 versus PCL and PLA; ** p < 0.01 versus PCL and PLA; *** p < 0.001 versus PCL and PLA; # p < 0.05 versus PCL-CUR; ## p < 0.01 versus PCL-CUR; ### p < 0.001 versus PCL-CUR.
Molecules 26 04866 g006
Figure 7. Antibacterial activity evaluated at 600 nm against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, and Streptococcus mutans. Bacterial growth in the presence of PCL and PLA were used as controls. For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD).
Figure 7. Antibacterial activity evaluated at 600 nm against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, and Streptococcus mutans. Bacterial growth in the presence of PCL and PLA were used as controls. For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD).
Molecules 26 04866 g007
Figure 8. DPPH scavenging activity of Cur loading membranes. For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD). Statistically significant variations: ## p < 0.005 versus PCL-Cur; # p < 0.05 versus PCL-Cur.
Figure 8. DPPH scavenging activity of Cur loading membranes. For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD). Statistically significant variations: ## p < 0.005 versus PCL-Cur; # p < 0.05 versus PCL-Cur.
Molecules 26 04866 g008
Figure 9. Cytotoxicity of curcumin released from Cur loading membranes tested via CCK-8 (A) and LDH (B) assays after 12, 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation. For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results were expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD).
Figure 9. Cytotoxicity of curcumin released from Cur loading membranes tested via CCK-8 (A) and LDH (B) assays after 12, 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation. For each sample, six different experiments were conducted, and the results were expressed as the mean of the values obtained (mean ± SD).
Molecules 26 04866 g009
Table 1. Onset temperatures, endset temperatures and residue contents of electrospun membranes.
Table 1. Onset temperatures, endset temperatures and residue contents of electrospun membranes.
PCL-CurPCL-Cur/PLAPLA
Residue (%)1.894.702.98
Onset (°C)372260315
Endset (°C)425395374
Table 2. Mechanical properties of electrospun membranes.
Table 2. Mechanical properties of electrospun membranes.
PCL-CurPCL-Cur/PLA
E (MPa)6.1 ± 0.548 ± 25
σbreak (MPa)2.19 ± 1.11.31 ± 0.3
ε break (mm/mm%)139 ± 3.546 ± 11
Table 3. Processing parameters of fibrous membranes fabricated by electrospinning.
Table 3. Processing parameters of fibrous membranes fabricated by electrospinning.
SamplePolymer Concentration
(% w/w)
Voltage
(kV)
Distance
(cm)
Flow Rate
(mL/h)
PCL-Cur1217.5180.5
Core: PCL-Cur
Shell: PLA
Core: 12
Shell: 12
2425Core: 0.5
Shell: 0.7
Table 4. QPCR primers.
Table 4. QPCR primers.
GeneForward Primer (5′—3′)Reverse Primer (5′—3′)Ref.
rhlAAGCTGGGACGAATACACCAGACTCCAGGTCGAGGAAATG[80]
rhlBGAGCGACGAACTGACCTACCGTTGAACTTGGGGTGTACCG[80]
comCGACTTTAAAGAAATTAAGACTGAAGCTTGTGTAAAACTTCTGT[81]
comDCTCTGATTGACCATTCTTCTGGCATTCTGAGTTTATGCCCCTC[81]
16SrRNACCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGCAACAGAGCTTTACGATCCGAAA[82]
16SrRNACAAAACTACTGAGCTAGAGTACGTAAGATCTCAAGGATCCCAACGGCT[83]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Salle, A.; Viscusi, G.; Di Cristo, F.; Valentino, A.; Gorrasi, G.; Lamberti, E.; Vittoria, V.; Calarco, A.; Peluso, G. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Curcumin-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for the Prevention of the Biofilm-Associated Infections. Molecules 2021, 26, 4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164866

AMA Style

Di Salle A, Viscusi G, Di Cristo F, Valentino A, Gorrasi G, Lamberti E, Vittoria V, Calarco A, Peluso G. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Curcumin-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for the Prevention of the Biofilm-Associated Infections. Molecules. 2021; 26(16):4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Salle, Anna, Gianluca Viscusi, Francesca Di Cristo, Anna Valentino, Giuliana Gorrasi, Elena Lamberti, Vittoria Vittoria, Anna Calarco, and Gianfranco Peluso. 2021. "Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Curcumin-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for the Prevention of the Biofilm-Associated Infections" Molecules 26, no. 16: 4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164866

APA Style

Di Salle, A., Viscusi, G., Di Cristo, F., Valentino, A., Gorrasi, G., Lamberti, E., Vittoria, V., Calarco, A., & Peluso, G. (2021). Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Curcumin-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for the Prevention of the Biofilm-Associated Infections. Molecules, 26(16), 4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164866

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop