Next Article in Journal
The Role of TGF-β3 in Radiation Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Effect of Antibacterial Peptides on Model Monolayers
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Key Roles of (p)ppGpp and DksA in Regulating Metabolism and Chemotaxis in Yersinia enterocolitica
Previous Article in Special Issue
Actinomycin-X2-Immobilized Silk Fibroin Film with Enhanced Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Activities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms24087609
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enzymatic Synthesis of a Novel Coumarin Aminophosphonates: Antibacterial Effects and Oxidative Stress Modulation on Selected E. coli Strains

by
Dominik Koszelewski
1,*,
Paweł Kowalczyk
2,*,
Anna Brodzka
1,
Anastasiia Hrunyk
1,
Karol Kramkowski
3 and
Ryszard Ostaszewski
1
1
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Animal Nutrition, The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Instytucka 3, 05-110 Jabłonna, Poland
3
Department of Physical Chemistry, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilińskiego 1 Str., 15-089 Białystok, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7609; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087609
Submission received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibacterial Strategies in Biomaterials: Current Progress and Challenges 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the synergistic effect of two important pharmacophores, coumarin and α-amino dimethyl phosphonate moieties, on antimicrobial activity toward selected LPS-varied E. coli strains. Studied antimicrobial agents were prepared via a Kabachnik–Fields reaction promoted by lipases. The products were provided with an excellent yield (up to 92%) under mild, solvent- and metal-free conditions. A preliminary exploration of coumarin α-amino dimethyl phosphonate analogs as novel antimicrobial agents was carried out to determine the basic features of the structure responsible for the observed biological activity. The structure–activity relationship revealed that an inhibitory activity of the synthesized compounds is strongly related to the type of the substituents located in the phenyl ring. The collected data demonstrated that coumarin-based α-aminophosphonates can be potential antimicrobial drug candidates, which is particularly crucial due to the constantly increasing resistance of bacteria to commonly used antibiotics.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli is a gram-negative bacteria which assists as a diverse microorganism in the fields of biotechnology and microbiology, where it has served as the host organism for the majority of work with recombinant DNA. This normally harmless commensal may easily become a highly adaptable pathogen causing serious diseases, such as gastroenteritis and extraintestinal infections of the urinary tract, bloodstream, and central nervous system [1]. The worldwide consequences of these infections are extraordinary, as hundreds of millions of people suffer from them [2]. Multi-drug resistance of E. coli to antimicrobial medicines, especially in developing countries, is considered one of the main causes of an ineffectiveness in the treatment of infectious diseases [3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) reports, multi-drug resistant pathogens are among the biggest challenges in treating bacterial infections worldwide, causing 10 million deaths a year by 2050 [4]. As a result of these premises and due to the high degree of antimicrobial resistance, it is necessary to develop effective antimicrobial drugs to treat bacterial resistance [5]. Current strategies in the pharmacological research of new lead compounds mostly refer to a large collection of molecules proven to be broadly useful as therapeutic agents, such as coumarins. Therefore, compounds that contain the 2H-chromen-2-one structural motif are well known in a variety of natural products [6,7,8,9]. Numerous biological activities have been attributed to simple coumarins as well as pyranocoumarins, furocoumarins, and analogues, e.g., antimicrobial, antiviral, anticancer, enzyme inhibition, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and central nervous system activities [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Coumarin and its derivatives found an important class of heterocyclic compounds that hold a dominant place in medicinal chemistry [18] (Figure 1).
In the last decade, α-aminophosphonates were intensively studied as a significant group of compounds because of their high biological activity [19,20,21], which broadens their applicability in agricultural and medicinal chemistry. Organophosphorus compounds are known for their antimicrobial activity (alafosfalin); for example, dialkyl α-aminophosphonates exhibit activity against pathogenic E. coli, S. aureus, Bacillus, or K. pneumonia strains (Figure 1) [22,23,24,25]. Based on the few available literature reports, the synergetic effect of these two pharmacophores, coumarin and α-aminophosphonate, incorporated in the same structure of the compound, may provide the desired antimicrobial effect, providing highly effective compounds against drug-resistant E. coli pathogenic strains [26,27,28,29].
Our previous studies revealed that several aminocoumarin peptidomimetics as well as α-aminophosphonates were effective inhibitors of growth of various LPS E. coli strains [30,31,32]. Thus, the aim of the current work is to develop a metal-free protocol for coumarin α-amino phosphonate derivatives preparation aimed at identifying features of the structure that could be important for anti-E. coli activity (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The Kabachnik–Fields reaction is the most practical approach for α-aminophosphonate preparation, as widely reported in the literature [33,34]. To improve the reaction yield, numerous protocols have been elaborated, such as ultrasound irradiation [35], the usage of ionic liquids [27], synthesis on the solid phase by mechanochemistry [36], and microwave irradiation [37]. The reactions can be mediated by various catalysts, such as SnCl2 [38], TiO2 [39], FeCl3 [40], Yb(PFO)3 [41], SbCl3/Al2O3 [42], and CF3CO2H [43]. However, a majority of them are toxic, expensive, and have to be used in stoichiometric amounts. Moreover, reported methods suffer from some drawbacks, such as moderate yields, tedious product isolation, and the use of unrecyclable catalysts. Additionally, due to pharmaceutical requirements, limits of heavy metal must be maintained below 5 ppm, which makes the above mentioned catalysts hardly acceptable for the industries. The green approaches toward α-aminophosphonates are rather limited [44]. Enzymes, which are natural catalysts with high catalytic activity, appear to be the unsurpassed alternative for the elaboration of new synthetic protocols that fulfill the restrictions related to safety and environmental protection. What is more, enzymes enable the synthesis of compounds without metal contamination, which is especially esteemed by the pharmaceutical industries.
Regarding non-natural activity of lipases [32], the model multicomponent reaction of 7-amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin (1 mmol), benzaldehyde (1 mmol), and dimethyl phosphite (1 mmol) was conducted in tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME) at 30 °C during 18 h (Scheme 1), (Table 1, entry 1). Eight commercially available lipases and two domestically prepared biocatalysts, pig liver acetone powder and wheat germ lipase, were verified as catalysts; the results are summarized in Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, immobilized lipase B from Candida antarctica (Novozym 435) was revealed as the best catalyst among the tested enzymes for this condensation reaction (Table 1, entry 3). The coumarin α-amino phosphonate 1 was obtained in good yield (51%) after 18 h in TBME at 30 °C. Without the enzyme, the product 1 formation was not observed (Table 1, entry 1). To confirm the promiscuous activity of CaLB in the studied reaction, non-catalytic bovine serum albumin (BSA) [45] and thermally deactivated CaLB were also tested. The obtained results indicated that only the application of BSA resulted in the formation of the target product 1 with 8% yield (Table 1, entries 20 and 21). These results clearly show that the peculiar active site of CaLB is responsible for the promotion of the studied multicomponent reaction. It is also worth noting that an attractive alternative to commercially used enzymes may be domestically made biocatalysts from readily available and cheap animal or plant tissues. The use of these biocatalysts in the model reaction led to the formation of the desired products with yields of 51% and 59%, respectively (Table 1, entries 5 and 11). The type of solvent used has a great impact on enzyme stability and activity [46]. Taking into account factors related to environmental protection, it was decided to investigate selected media commonly recognized as green and sustainable solvents in chemical processes (Table 1, entries 13–15) [46,47,48]. Among tested solvents, product 1 provided the highest yield: 81% in tetrahydro-2-methylfuran (2-MeTHF) (Table 1, entry 13). To our delight, the target coumarin α-aminophosphonate 1 was obtained in 83% yield under solvent-free conditions. The increase of the reaction time to 24 h did not substantially affected the yield (85%) (Table 1, entry 12). Therefore, in subsequent optimization studies, the reactions were conducted under solvent-free conditions. Further, we have studied the impact of temperature on the reaction course. The elevation of the temperature to 40 °C and 50 °C resulted in a decrease in the yield of product 1, which may be explained by the changes in the quaternary structure of the used enzyme (Table 1, entries 17 and 18) [49]. Then, we also investigated the amount of catalyst. The change of the amount of enzyme from 50 mg to 80 mg led to a slight increase in the yield (Table 1, entry 19). Thus, 80 mg of Novozym 435 was found to be optimal. Analogous to other addition reactions catalyzed by lipases, the obtained chiral products remain racemic [50].
Additionally, three various non-enzymatic catalysts reported in the literature as eco-friendly promoters of Kabachnik–Fields reaction [51,52,53], copper-based metal organic frameworks, copper(I) iodide under microwave irradiation, and Amberlyst 15, were tested for the studied transformation, resulting in the formation of the desired product 1 with up to 42% yield (Table 1, entries 22, 23 and 25). Moreover, recently reported boron trifluoride diethyl etherate [29] was also engaged as a catalyst in studied reaction; however, product 1 was obtained with a moderate yield 31% (Table 1, entry 24).
The reusability of the enzyme is an important economic aspect resulting in a significant reduction in the cost of the synthesis. In this work, Novozym 435 was recycled up to five times with a gradual decrease in the yield of target product 1 to 67% after the fifth cycle (Figure 2).
Finally, we applied the developed enzymatic protocol for various aldehydes, obtaining coumarin α-amino phosphonate derivatives 2–13 with good to excellent yields (Figure 3). The elaborated procedure provides straightforward and direct access to α-amino phosphonates, which are structural analogs of compounds with well recognized antimicrobial activity [29]. The enzymatic Kabachnik–Fields reaction with aromatic aldehydes possessing electron-donating groups as well as hetero-aromatic aldehydes provided products 2, 3, 10, and 11 with the highest yield ranges, from 81% to 92% (Figure 3). A decrease in the reaction yield was observed for sterically bulky aldehydes with an electron-withdrawing nitro group located at the meta-position of the phenyl ring and naphthyl group, which resulted in the formation of products 8 and 12 with 51% and 33% yields, respectively (Figure 3). It is also worth noting that replacing the CF3- group with a methyl group in the coumarin scaffold significantly reduced the yield of the resulting product 13 to 64%. This may be explained by the substrate selectivity of the enzyme. In order to ensure the effective contact of the solid reactants, 2-MeTHF was used in several cases, resulting in the formation of products 5–9 and 12 with good reaction yields, up to 69% (Figure 3). The analytical data of all newly obtained compounds (1–13) are presented in the experimental part (Supplementary Materials Figures S4–S42).
Further experiments were conducted to get insights on the reaction pathway. Under the elaborated conditions, 7-(benzylideneamino)-4-trifluoromethyl-2H-chromen-2-one (15) [54] was used together with dimethyl H-phosphite in the presence of Novozym 435 as a catalyst, which resulted in the formation of the target coumarin α-amino phosphonate 1 in a high yield (73%). The obtained results may suggest that the tested reaction proceeds through the formation of the appropriate imine followed by the addition of the phosphite form activated in the oxy-anion hole located in the active center of the enzyme (Scheme 2).

2.2. Cytotoxic Studies of the Library of Coumarin α-Aminophoshonates 1–13 and Coumarin 14

The noxious activity of all 14 examined agents on bacterial cells was measured after the analysis of the MIC and MBC tests (Figure 3), for which the MIC values were recorded in the range of 0.2–1.4 µg/mL, and MBC values −2–82 µg/mL for the investigated model strains K12, R2, R3 and R4) (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Model strains of E.coli were plotted in all 48-well plates observed. The K12 and R2–R4 strains were treated with the investigated coumarin α-aminophoshonates. From analysis of the MIC and MBC assays, for all tested compounds, color changes were observed with different levels depending on dilutions. Bacterial strains R3 and R4 were the most susceptible to a modification with these compounds due to the increasing length of their LPS (visible dilutions of 10−3 corresponding to a concentration of 0.25 µM) versus strains K12 and R2 (visible dilutions of 10−6 corresponding to a concentration of 0.06 µM). The analyzed R4 strain was the most sensitive of all strains, probably due to the longest lipopolysaccharide chain in the bacterial membrane. In all cases, the MBC values were approximately 222 times higher than the MIC values (Figure 6), since the K12 E. coli strain has native LPS while the Fpg overproducer E. coli strain without native LPS has an inducible level of Fpg protein. This strain was used as an additional control to determine whether the process of oxidative stress occurs in bacterial cells under the modification with the analyzed compounds.
The strain with Fpg protein was used only as a control for other E.coli model strains to show oxidative stress, which was induced in bacterial cells.

2.3. The Analysis of Bacterial DNA Isolated from E. coli R2–R4 Strains Modified with Tested Coumarin α-Aminophoshonates

The results of our current studies (MIC values) and those previously obtained [55,56,57,58] revealed that coumarin α-aminophoshonates show a strong toxic effect on the analyzed E. coli model strains. The compounds numbered 1–4, 6, 8, 9, and 12–14 showed the highest activity, similar to the biological activity of commonly used antibiotics. (see Figure S1 in supplementary materials)
Modified bacterial DNA was digested with Fpg, as described earlier [59,60,61,62,63]. All selected coumarin α-aminophoshonates (Figure 7) can strongly change the topology of bacterial DNA. After digestion with Fpg, mainly in enzymes of the base excision repair system (BER), an oxidative damage of approximately 3.5% was identified, which very strongly indicates oxidative damage in bacterial DNA [64,65], particularly in the R4 strain, as evidenced by the obtained MIC and MBC values. The obtained results for individual compounds were statistically significant at the level of p < 0.05. (Table 2).
The results of our studies show that newly synthesized compounds can potentially be engaged as “replacements” for the currently used antibiotics in hospital and clinical infections.
The development and synthesis of new coumarin derivatives may constitute a new alternative to the commonly used antimicrobial agents in clinical infections (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Thus, studies of the antibacterial activity of newly synthesized compounds are of great importance in nosocomial or clinical infections [66,67]. The toxic effect of the newly obtained compounds was tested on Escherichia coli cells of the K12 strain (having native LPS) and R2–R4 strains (with different LPS lengths). The results of the MIC and MBC tests indicate that the studied coumarin derivatives significantly influenced the defragmentation of the membrane and the structure of the bacteria cell wall containing LPS of various lengths, causing oxidative stress. This was further verified through the digestion by the specific enzyme Fpg of modified bacterial DNA (Labjot, New England Biolabs, UK), recognizing oxidized guanine and adenine. The oxidative damage observed after digestion with the Fpg protein in the bacterial DNA was compared with that obtained after the treatment with antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, bleomycin, and cloxacillin [56,57,58]. The results of our research show that coumarin α-aminophoshonates can be used in the future as typical “substitutes” for new antimicrobial drugs.
To study oxidative stress, the modified bacterial DNA was digested with a marker of oxidative stress: Fpg protein from the group of repair glycosylases [59,60]. We investigated whether the resulting modifications in bacterial DNA would introduce oxidative damage to the DNA chain by changing the topological three forms of bacterial DNA: ccc, oc, and linear forms. Such results were in accordance with our previous studies [56,57,58,59]. The modification of bacterial DNA with the studied compounds (Figure S2 in supplementary materials with the action of Fpg) led to the observation that all analyzed coumarin α-aminophoshonates can strongly affect the topology of bacterial DNA, even after digestion with Fpg protein based on agarose gels. The sensitivity of E. coli strains to the cytotoxic effect of the compounds used, and after the digestion of the Fpg protein was as follows: R4 > R2 > R3 > K12, which remains in agreement with our previous studies [55,56,57,58,59]. The obtained results show that the coumarin derivatives are highly cytotoxic towards bacterial DNA, probably by the modification of the components of the bacterial membrane and the LPS located in it, which may induce specific enzymes from topoisomerase and helicase groups, leading to the destabilization of the exposed DNA base structure. Such destabilization is crucial for the bacterial cell’s survival and may play an important role in changing its electrokinetic potential, expressing the reversal of burdens. Blocking these enzymes stops DNA replication, causing the bacterial cell’s apoptosis. In the future, cytotoxicity studies will be also carried out using various cell lines and cultures to assess the biocompatibility of test compounds with active coumarin α-aminophoshonates. The dysfunction of bacterial membranes containing different lengths of LPS in model bacterial strains is an ideal model to assess the effectiveness of these compounds in relation to the antibiotics used [60,61,62].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Microorganisms and Media

E. coli K-12 and R1–R4 strains were received from Prof. Jolanta Łukasiewicz at the Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland). The reference bacterial strains of E.coli (K12 ATCC 25404, R2 ATCC 39544, R3 ATCC 11775, and R4 ATCC 39543) were provided by LGC Standards U.K., and E.coli Fpg Y9070L was used according to the recommendation of ISO 11133: 2014. These strains were used to test the antibacterial activity of the synthesized agents. Bacteria were cultivated in a tryptic soy broth (TSB; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MI, USA) liquid medium and on agar plates containing TSB medium at 25 °C. Alternatively, TSB agar plates were used. The specific growth rate (μ) according to first-order kinetics was measured using a microplate reader (Thermo, Multiskan FC, Vantaa, Finland) at 605 nm in TSB medium. Lanes 1kb-ladder and Quick Extend DNA ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) were used for the MIC and MBC tests, as described in detail in the previous work [55,56,57,58], and analyzed by the Tukey test, indicated by (p < 0.05): * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.1, *** p < 0.01.

3.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

The MIC was estimated by a microtiter plate method using sterile 48- or 96-well plates [56]. First, precursor and TIL solutions were prepared in DMSO at 20 mg mL−1. Fifty microliters of the solutions were placed in the first row of the plate. Next, 25 μL of sterile TSB medium was added to the other wells, and serial dilutions were performed. Then, 200 μL of inoculated TSB medium containing resazurin (0.02 mg/mL) as an indicator was added to all the wells. TSB medium was inoculated with 10(6) colony-forming units (CFU) mL−1 (approximately 0.5 McFarland units) of the bacterial strains. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Colour changes from blue to pink or yellowish with turbidity were taken as positive, and the lowest concentration at which there was no visible color change was the MIC. The MBC was estimated based on the measurement of the dehydrogenases activity in the cultures after 24 h incubation without the ILs. Four milliliters of a dense culture (approximately 109 CFU mL−1) that was incubated for 24 h in TSB medium at 25 °C was added to identical test tubes. Next, the tested compounds were added to the test tubes until the mixture reached final concentrations of 10–250 mg mL−1. Then, the cultures containing the TILs were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C. Next, 0.1 g of CaCO3 and 0.1 mL of a 3% triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) solution were added to the test tubes. Then, the test tubes were sealed with parafilm and incubated for 1 h at 30 °C in darkness. The lowest concentration at which there was no visible red color (formazan) was taken as the MBC.

3.3. Chemicals

All reagents and the solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All solvents were of analytical grade and were used without prior distillation. All specific strains, such as Pseudomonas fluorescens (PfL) (catalogue number 534730, Lot. number MKBH1198V), Candida rugosa (CrL) (catalogue number 90860, Lot. number BCBH7102V), Candida cylindracea (CcL) (catalogue number 62316, Lot. number 1336707), Burkholderia cepacian (Pseudomonas cepacia lipase PcL) (catalogue number 534641, Lot. Number MKBV0029V), and Rhizomucor miehei (RmL) (catalogue number 80484), and bovine serum albumin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Immobilized lipase from Candida antarctica B (Novozym 435) (catalogue number LC200223) was purchased from Novo Nordisk. Lipase from porcine pancreas, Type II (PpL) (catalogue number L-3126, Lot. number 108H1379) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Pig liver was converted to the acetone powder (PLAP) by the method of Connors et al. [68]. Homemade lipase from wheat germ (WgL) was prepared according to the literature protocol [69]. Merck silica gel plates 60 F254 were used for TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography) analysis. Crude reaction mixtures were purified using column chromatography on Merck silica gel 60/230–400 mesh, with an appropriate mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate as an eluent. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (NMR) were performed on the Varian apparatus (Varian, Saint Louis, MI, USA) (400 MHz); the mass spectrometer was from Waters Company, Milford, CT, USA. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm and coupling constant (J) in Hz, using TMS as an internal standard. High-resolution mass spectra were acquired on a Maldi SYNAPT G2-S HDMS (Waters) apparatus with a QqTOF analyser. Enzymatic reactions were performed in a vortex (Heidolph Promax 1020) equipped with incubator (Heidolph Inkubator 1000). To prove the ability of the established protocol, each reaction was repeated at least three times.

3.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Coumarin α-Aminophosphonates 1–13

The general procedure for the enzyme-catalyzed Kabachnik–Fields reaction follows: a mixture of the corresponding 7-amino-4-trifluoromethyl coumarin or 7-amino-4-methyl coumarin (1 mmol), the corresponding aldehyde (1 mmol), dimethyl phosphite (1 mmol) and Novozym 435 (80 mg) (2-Me-THF (2 mL) if noted; see Figure 2) was shaken at 200 rpm at 30 °C for 18 h. After the completion of reaction, the catalyst was separated on a glass frit funnel. The residue was washed with ethyl acetate. The combined organic phase was concentrated under a vacuum. The resulting residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, eluent: ethyl acetate/hexanes, 6:4) to afford the target coumarin α-aminophosphonates 1–13. The yields of the derivatives are shown in Figure 2. The structures of the products were identified by their 1H, 31P and 13C NMR in electronic support information (ESI) and for known compounds compared with literature data.
  • Dimethyl ((phenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino)methyl) phosphonate (1). Compound 1 was obtained according to the General method with 86% (367 mg, 0.86 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 198–199 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.45 (ddd, J = 8.9, 6.0, 2.1 Hz, 3H), 7.40–7.29 (m, 3H), 6.67 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (dd, J = 10.2, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 5.85 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (dd, J = 24.2, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 3H), 3.44 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H); 13Ca NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.9, 156.6, 150.4, 143.2, 141.6, 134.1, 129.1, 129.0, 127.6, 124.3, 112.3, 99.7, 55.9, 54.3, 53.7, 53.7; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.6. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H17F3NO5PNa [M + Na]+, 450.0694, found 450.0689.
  • Dimethyl ((4-methoxyphenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (2). Compound 2 was obtained according to the General method with 92% (421 mg, 0.92 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 207–209 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CHCl3) δ 7.44–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.37 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.64 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.76 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (dd, J = 23.7, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.77 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H), 3.46 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.9, 156.6, 150.6, 150.5, 128.9, 128.8, 126.1, 125.8, 125.8, 114.6, 114.5, 112.3, 104.8, 99.7, 55.3, 54.2, 53.7, 53.6, 52.0; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H19F3NO6PNa [M + Na]+, 480.0800, found 480.0794.
  • Dimethyl ((4-methylphenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (3). Compound 3 was obtained according to the General method with 84% (371 mg, 0.84 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 194–196 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.64 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.66 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (dd, J = 23.9, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.46 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.9, 156.6, 150.8, 150.7, 138.5, 131.1, 131.0, 129.8, 129.7, 127.7, 127.6, 126.0, 112.3, 109.6, 109.5, 104.7, 99.7, 55.6, 54.3, 54.2, 53.7, 52.0, 21.1; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H19F3NO5PNa [M + Na]+, 464.0851, found 464.0847.
  • Dimethyl ((4-fluorophenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (4). Compound 4 was obtained according to the General method with 78% (347 mg, 0.78 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 182–184 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44 (ddt, J = 8.8, 5.5, 2.1 Hz, 3H), 7.12–6.99 (m, 2H), 6.65 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.48–6.37 (m, 2H), 5.94 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (dd, J = 24.1, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.51 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 156.6, 150.5, 150.3, 130.0, 129.5,129.4, 129.3, 126.2, 116.3, 116.2, 116.1, 116.0, 112.1, 110.0, 104.9, 99.7, 60.3, 54.2, 54.1, 53.8, 53.7; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.3. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H16F4NO5PNa [M + Na]+, 468.0600, found 468.0596.
  • Dimethyl ((4-bromophenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (5). Compound 5 was obtained according to the General method with 69% (349 mg, 0.69 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 188–190 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.9, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.29 (m, 2H), 6.63 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.84 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (dd, J = 24.4, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 3H), 3.53 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.7, 156.5, 150.2, 141.4, 133.4, 132.3, 132.2, 129.3, 126.2, 122.7, 112.1, 105.0, 99.8, 55.4, 54.3, 54.2, 53.9, 53.8; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 22.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H16BrF3NO5PNa [M + Na]+, 527.9799, found 527.9794.
  • Dimethyl ((4-iodophenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (6). Compound 6 was obtained according to the General method with 58% (320 mg, 0.58 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 209–211 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.69 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (dd, J = 8.9, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 6.63 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 5.94 (dd, J = 9.7, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (dd, J = 24.4, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.54 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.7, 156.5, 150.4, 150.2, 138.1, 134.1, 129.5, 126.2, 123.0, 112.1, 110.0, 105.0, 99.8, 94.3, 55.5, 54.3, 54.0, 53.9, 53.8; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 22.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H16F3INO5PNa [M + Na]+, 575.9661, found 575.9655.
  • Dimethyl ((4-chlorophenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (7). Compound 7 was obtained according to the General method with 62% (286 mg, 0.62 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 213–214 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.72–6.60 (m, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 5.80 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (dd, J = 24.3, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.53 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.7, 156.5, 150.2, 134.6, 132.8, 129.3, 129.2, 129.0, 128.9, 126.2, 112.1, 110.0, 105.0, 99.8, 55.3, 54.3, 53.9, 53.8; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 22.9. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H16F3ClNO5PNa [M + Na]+, 484.0304, found 484.0299.
  • Dimethyl ((3-nitrophenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (8). Compound 8 was obtained according to the General method with 51% (241 mg, 0.51 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 195–197 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.36 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.9, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (s, 2H), 6.28 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (dd, J = 24.9, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 3H), 3.65 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.5, 150.2, 150.0, 148.7, 137.2, 137.1, 133.8, 133.7, 129.9, 129.9, 126.4, 123.5, 123.5, 122.4, 122.3, 111.9, 105.2, 99.8, 55.3, 54.3, 54.1, 53.8; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.9. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H16F3N2O7PNa [M + Na]+, 495.0545, found 495.0541.
  • Dimethyl ((4-nitrophenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (9). Compound 9 was obtained according to the General method with 65% (307 mg, 0.65 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 199–201 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 2H), 7.47 – 7.39 (m, 1H), 6.63 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.01 (dd, J = 10.0, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (dd, J = 25.2, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.62 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.5, 156.5, 150.0, 149.9, 148.0, 142.1, 142.0, 128.6, 128.5, 124.1, 111.9, 105.3, 99.9, 55.6, 54.3, 54.2, 54.1, 54.0. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.8. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H16F3N2O7PNa [M + Na]+, 495.0545, found 495.0538.
  • Dimethyl ((furan-2-yl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (10). Compound 10 was obtained according to the General method with 76% (317 mg, 0.76 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 193–194 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.50–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.41 (q, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (s, 2H), 6.36 (dd, J = 3.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (dd, J = 23.5, 8.7 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.63 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 156.6, 150.3, 150.2, 147.5, 143.1, 126.2, 112.1, 111.0, 110.9, 109.5, 105.1, 99.6, 54.1, 53.9, 53.8, 48.2; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.1. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C17H15F3NO6PNa [M + Na]+, 440.0487, found 440.0482.
  • Dimethyl ((tiophen-2-yl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (11). Compound 11 was obtained according to the General method with 81% (351 mg, 0.81 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 205–207 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46 (dd, J = 9.0, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.25 (m, 1H), 7.20 (td, J = 2.9, 2.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (ddd, J = 5.1, 3.6, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 6.45 (s, 1H), 5.79 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (dd, J = 23.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 3H), 3.61 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 156.6, 150.4, 150.3, 137.6, 137.5, 127.4, 127.0, 126.9, 126.2, 126.1, 112.1, 110.1, 110.0, 105.1, 99.8, 54.4, 54.3, 53.9, 51.7, 50.1; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C17H15F3NO5PSNa [M + Na]+, 456.0258, found 456.0253.
  • Dimethyl ((naphthalen-1-yl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino) methyl)phosphonate (12). Compound 11 was obtained according to the General method with 33% (158 mg, 0.33 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 218–220 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.86–7.69 (m, 3H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.35 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.76–6.66 (m, 1H), 6.61 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 5.05 (dd, J = 24.3, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 3H), 3.48 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.9, 156.5, 151.0, 150.9, 141.7, 141.4, 133.2, 131.8, 128.9, 128.9, 127.9, 127.7, 127.1, 127.0, 126.5, 126.0, 125.2, 125.1, 123.1, 120.3, 112.1, 109.5, 109.5, 104.6, 99.8, 56.0, 54.5, 54.3, 54.2, 53.8; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.4. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C23H19F3NO5PNa [M + Na]+, 500.0851, found 500.0845.
  • Dimethyl ((phenyl)((2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromen-7-yl)amino)methyl) phosphonate (13). Compound 13 was obtained according to the General method with 64% (239 mg, 0.64 mmol) as a yellow solid; m.p.: 205–207 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.27 (m, 4H), 6.58 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (s, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 5.49 (dd, J = 9.9, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (dd, J = 24.2, 7.7 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.5, 155.5, 152.6, 149.6, 149.5, 134.5, 128.9, 128.5, 128.4, 127.7, 125.4, 111.6, 111.3, 110.2, 99.7, 56.0, 54.5, 53.7, 53.6, 18.4; 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.9. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C19H20NO5PNa [M + Na]+, 396.0977, found 396.0965.

4. Conclusions

Here we present a novel approach to coumarin α-aminophosphonates via an enzyme-catalyzed Kabachnik–Fields reaction. This protocol is characterized by mild, metal-free reaction conditions leading to the formation of the desired products with high yields. The crucial role of solvent type on the reaction efficiency was revealed. It is also worth mentioning that the biocatalyst can be reused several times, which significantly reduces the overall cost of the synthesis. The developed protocol is solvent-free, which makes this procedure environmentally benign. The obtained coumarin derivatives were also tested as potential antimicrobial agents against selected E. coli strains. The antimicrobial activity was enhanced by the synergetic effect of two pharmacophores, coumarin and α-amino phosphonate. The impact of the coumarin α-aminophosphonates structure on the antimicrobial activity against model strains of Escherichia coli K12 and R2–R4 was investigated. The newly synthesized compounds can modify all tested E. coli strains (R2–R4) and their bacterial DNA, changing the spatial structure of the LPS in their cell membranes. Among the tested coumarin α-aminophosphonates, compounds 4–8 and 10–12 showed super-selectivity and exhibited the highest cytotoxic activity, comparable to or better than the antibiotics ciprofloxacin, bleomycin, and cloxacillin.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24087609/s1.

Author Contributions

P.K. and D.K.; methodology, P.K., D.K., A.H., A.B., K.K. and R.O.; investigation, P.K. and D.K.; resources, P.K.; data curation, K.K. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.K., R.O. and D.K.; writing—review and editing, D.K., R.O. and P.K.; supervision, P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Medical University of Białystok Grant of National Science Center Opus 22 Nr 2021/43/B/NZ7/01903 and by National Science Center, Poland project OPUS No. 2019/33/B/ST4/01118 and SUB1/NN/22/001/2201. B.SUB.23.359, SUB/2/NN/22/001/2201.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

On request of those interested.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jolanta Łukasiewicz from Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (Polish Academy of Sciences) for providing the strains of E. coli. We would like to thank Agata Koszelewska for her help in editing schemes and figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

MICminimum inhibitory concentration
MBCminimum bactericidal concentration
Ocopen circle
Ccccovalently closed circle
BERbase excision repair
FpgDNA-formamidopyrimidine glycosylase
TBMEtert-butyl methyl ether
LPSLipopolysaccharide
CaLBCandida antarctica Lipase B

References

  1. Kaper, J.; Nataro, J.; Mobley, H. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tuem, K.B.; Gebre, A.K.; Atey, T.M.; Bitew, H.; Yimer, E.M.; Berhe, D.F. Drug Resistance Patterns of Escherichia coli in Ethiopia: A Meta-Analysis. Hindawi BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 4536905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Erb, A.; Stürmer, T.; Marre, R.; Brenner, H. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli: Overview of geographical, temporal, and methodological variations. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 26, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IACG. Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (2019) No Time to Wait: Securing the Future from Drug-Resistant Infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations; IACG: Hyderabad, India, 2019; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  5. Prestinaci, F.; Pezzotti, P.; Pantosti, A. Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2015, 109, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sarker, S.D.; Nahar, L. Progress in the Chemistry of Naturally Occurring Coumarins. Prog. Chem. Org. Nat. Prod. 2017, 106, 241–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Murray, R.D.H. The naturally occurring coumarins. Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 2002, 83, 1–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Soine, T.O. Naturally Occurring Coumarins and Related Physiological Activities. J. Pharm. Sci. 1964, 53, 231–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kirsch, G.; Abdelwahab, A.B.; Chaimbault, P. Natural and Synthetic Coumarins with Effects on Inflammation. Molecules 2016, 21, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kontogiorgis, C.; Detsi, A.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. Coumarin-based drugs: A patent review (2008–present). Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2012, 22, 437–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mustafa, Y.F.; Bashir, M.K.; Oglah, M.K. Original and Innovative Advances in the Synthetic Schemes of Coumarin-Based Derivatives: A Review. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 598–612. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ismael, R.M.; Mustafa, Y.F.; Al-Qazaz, H.K. Coumarin-based products: Their biodiversity and pharmacology. Iraqi J. Pharm. 2021, 18, 162–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Borges, F.; Roleira, F.; Milhazes, N.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E. Simple coumarins and analogues in medicinal chemistry: Occurrence, synthesis and biological activity. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 887–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Riveiro, M.E.; De Kimpe, N.; Moglioni, A.; Vázquez, R.; Monczor, F.; Shayo, C.; Davio, C. Coumarins: Old compounds with novel promising therapeutic perspectives. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 1325–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, S.; Cho, M.; Karlsberg, K.; Zhou, D.; Yuan, Y.-C. Biochemical and Biological Characterization of a Novel Anti-aromatase Coumarin Derivative. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 48071–48078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kulkarni, M.V.; Kulkarni, G.M.; Lin, C.-H.; Sun, C.-M. Recent Advances in Coumarins and 1-Azacoumarins as Versatile Biodynamic Agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 2795–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Al-Majedy, Y.; Kadhum, A.A.; Ibraheem, H.; Al-Amiery, A.; Moneim, A.A.; Mohamad, A.B. A Systematic Review on Pharmacological Activities of 4-Methylumbelliferon. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2018, 9, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Coumarins. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com/categories/DBCAT000641 (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  19. Varga, P.R.; Dinnyési, E.; Tóth, S.; Szakács, G.; Keglevich, G. Optimized Synthesis and Cytotoxic Activity of α-Aminophosphonates Against a Multidrug Resistant Uterine Sarcoma Cell Line. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2023, 20, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shaikh, S.; Dhavan, P.; Singh, P.; Uparkar, J.; Vaidya, S.P.; Jadhav, B.L.; Ramana, M.M.V. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel antipyrine based α-aminophosphonates as anti-Alzheimer and anti-inflammatory agent. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023, 41, 386–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elsherbiny, D.A.; Abdelgawad, A.M.; Shaheen, T.I.; Abdelwahed, N.A.M.; Jockenhoevel, S.; Ghazanfari, S. Thermoresponsive nanofibers loaded with antimicrobial α-aminophosphonate-o/w emulsion supported by cellulose nanocrystals for smart wound care patches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maruyama, H.B.; Arisawa, M.; Sawada, T. Alafosfalin, a new inhibitor of cell wall biosynthesis: In vitro activity against urinary isolates in Japan and potentiation with beta-lactams. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1979, 16, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kenawy, E.R.S.; Azaam, M.M.; Saad-Allah, K.M. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of α-aminophosphonates containing chitosan moiety. Arab. J. Chem. 2015, 8, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abdel-Megeed, M.F.; Badr, B.E.; Azaam, M.M.; El-Hiti, G.A. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activities of a Novel Series of Heterocyclic α-Aminophosphonates. Arch. Pharm. 2012, 345, 784–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Poola, S.; Nagaripati, S.; Tellamekala, S.; Chintha, V.; Kotha, P.; Yagani, J.R.; Golla, N.; Cirandur, S.R. Green synthesis, antibacterial, antiviral and molecular docking studies of α-aminophosphonates. Synth. Commun. 2020, 50, 2655–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kawase, M.; Varu, B.; Shah, A.; Motohashi, N.; Tani, S.; Saito, S.; Debnath, S.; Mahapatra, S.; Dastidar, S.G.; Chakrabarty, A.N. Antimicrobial Activity of New Coumarin Derivatives. Arzneimittelforschung 2001, 51, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Litim, B.; Cheraiet, Z.; Meliani, S. Synthesis and potent antimicrobial activity of novel coumarylthiazole α-aminophosphonates derivatives. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Koleva, A.I.; Petkova-Yankova, N.I.; Nikolova, R.D. Synthesis and Chemical Properties of 3-Phosphono-coumarins and 1,2-Benzoxaphosphorins as Precursors for Bioactive Compounds. Molecules 2019, 24, 2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, X.-C.; Zeng, C.-M.; Avula, S.R.; Peng, X.-M.; Geng, R.-X.; Zhou, C.-H. Novel coumarin aminophosphonates as potential multitargeting antibacterial agents against Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 245, 114891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kowalczyk, P.; Madej, A.; Paprocki, D.; Szymczak, M.; Ostaszewski, R. Coumarin Derivatives as New Toxic Compounds to Selected K12, R1–R4 E. coli Strains. Materials 2020, 13, 2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kowalczyk, P.; Wilk, M.; Parul, P.; Szymczak, M.; Kramkowski, K.; Raj, S.; Skiba, G.; Sulejczak, D.; Kleczkowska, P.; Ostaszewski, R. The Synthesis and Evaluation of Aminocoumarin Peptidomimetics as Cytotoxic Agents on Model Bacterial E. coli Strains. Materials 2021, 14, 5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koszelewski, D.; Kowalczyk, P.; Śmigielski, P.; Samsonowicz-Górski, J.; Kramkowski, K.; Wypych, A.; Szymczak, M.; Ostaszewski, R. Relationship between Structure and Antibacterial Activity of α-Aminophosphonate Derivatives Obtained via Lipase-Catalyzed Kabachnik−Fields Reaction. Materials 2022, 15, 3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Varga, P.R.; Keglevich, G. Synthesis of α-Aminophosphonates and Related Derivatives; The Last Decade of the Kabachnik–Fields Reaction. Molecules 2021, 26, 2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Keglevich, G.; Bálint, E. The Kabachnik–Fields Reaction: Mechanism and Synthetic Use. Molecules 2012, 17, 12821–12835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rasal, S.A.; Tamore, M.S.; Shimpi, N.G. Ultrasoundmediated synthesis of novel α-aminophosphonates using graphene nanosheets-silver nanoparticles (GNS-AgNPs) as a recyclable heterogeneous catalyst. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 2293–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fiore, C.; Sovic, I.; Lukin, S.; Halasz, I.; Martina, K.; Delogu, F.; Ricci, P.C.; Porcheddu, A.; Shemchuk, O.; Braga, D.; et al. Kabachnik–Fields Reaction by Mechanochemistry: New Horizons from Old Methods. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 18889–18902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kundeab, S.P.; Kanade, K.G.; Karalea, B.K.; Akolkara, H.N.; Arbuj, S.S.; Randhavanea, P.V.; Shindea, S.T.; Shaikha, M.H.; Kulkarni, A.K. Nanostructured N doped TiO2 efficient stable catalyst for Kabachnik–Fields reaction under microwave irradiation. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 26997–27005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gallardo-Macias, R.; Nakayama, K. Tin(II) compounds as catalysts for the Kabachnik–Fields reaction under solvent-free conditions: Facile synthesis of α-aminophosphonates. Synthesis 2010, 1, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hosseini-Sarvari, M. TiO2 as a new and reusable catalyst for one-pot threecomponent syntheses of α-aminophosphonates in solvent-free conditions. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 5459–5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rezaei, Z.; Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Ghaderi, A.; Jafari, M.R.; Zare, H.R. Design and one-pot synthesis of α-aminophosphonates and bis(α-aminophosphonates) by iron(III) chloride and cytotoxic activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 4266–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tang, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Mao, D. A facile synthesis of α-aminophosphonates catalyzed by ytterbium perfluorooctanoate under solvent-free conditions. J. Fluor. Chem. 2011, 132, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ambica, K.S.; Taneja, S.C.; Hundal, M.S.; Kapoor, K.K. Onepot synthesis of α-aminophosphonates catalyzed by antimony trichloride adsorbed on alumina. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 2208–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Akiyama, T.; Sanada, M.; Fuchibe, K. Bronsted acid-mediated synthesis of α-amino phosphonates under solventfree conditions. Synlett 2003, 10, 1463–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amira, A.; Aouf, Z.; K’tir, H.; Chemam, Y.; Ghodbane, R.; Zerrouki, R.; Aouf, N. Recent Advances in the Synthesis of α-Aminophosphonates: A Review. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 6137–6149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Bovine serum albumin: An efficient and green biocatalyst for the one-pot four-component synthesis of pyrano[2,3-c]pyrazoles. Chin. J. Catal. 2016, 37, 1461–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aissa, R.; Guezane-Lakoud, S.; Kolodziej, E.; Toffano, M.; Aribi-Zouioueche, L. Diastereoselective synthesis of bis(a-aminophosphonates) by lipase catalytic promiscuity. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 8153–8159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Clarke, C.J.; Tu, W.-C.; Levers, O.; Bröhl, A.; Hallett, J.P. Green and Sustainable Solvents in Chemical Processes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 747–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Capello, C.; Fischer, U.; Hungerbühler, K. What is a green solvent? A comprehensive framework for the environmental assessment of solvents. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Somero, G.N. Proteins and Temperature. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1995, 57, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guezane-Lakoud, S.; Toffano, M.; Aribi-Zouioueche, L. Promiscuous lipase catalyzed a new P–C bond formation: Green and efficient protocol for one- pot synthesis of α- aminophosphonates. Heteroat. Chem. 2017, 28, e21408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zandieh, H.; Mokhtari, J.; Larijani, K. Synthesis of α-amino phosphonates catalyzed by copper-based metal organic frameworks. J. Organometal. Chem. 2022, 957, 122156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Keglevich, G.; Kiss, N.Z.; Grün, A.; Bálint, E.; Kovács, T. Advantages of the Microwave Tool in Organophosphorus Syntheses. Synthesis 2017, 49, 3069–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tajbakhsh, M.; Heydari, A.; Alinezhada, H.; Ghaneia, M.; Khaksarb, S. Coupling of Aldehydes, Amines, and Trimethyl Phosphite Promoted by Amberlyst-15: Highly Efficient Synthesis of α-Aminophosphonates. Synthesis 2008, 3, 352–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, H.J.; Bhuniya, S.; Mahajan, R.K.; Puri, R.; Liu, H.; Ko, K.C.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, J.S. Fluorescence turn-on sensors for HSO4−. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2009, 7128–7130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Koszelewski, D.; Ostaszewski, R.; Smigielski, P.; Hrunyk, A.; Kramkowski, K.; Laskowski, Ł.; Laskowska, M.; Lizut, R.; Szymczak, M.; Michalski, J.; et al. Pyridine Derivatives—A New Class of Compounds That Are Toxic to E. coli K12, R2–R4 Strains. Materials 2021, 14, 5401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Samsonowicz-Górski, J.; Kowalczyk, P.; Koszelewski, D.; Brodzka, A.; Szymczak, M.; Kramkowski, K.; Ostaszewski, R. The Synthesis and Evaluation of Amidoximes as Cytotoxic Agents on Model Bacterial E. coli Strains. Materials 2021, 14, 7577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kowalczyk, P.; Trzepizur, D.; Szymczak, M.; Skiba, G.; Kramkowski, K.; Ostaszewski, R. 1,2-Diarylethanols—A New Class of Compounds That Are Toxic to E. coli K12, R2–R4 Strains. Materials 2021, 14, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kowalczyk, P.; Madej, A.; Szymczak, M.; Ostaszewski, R. α-Amidoamids as New Replacements of Antibiotics—Research on the Chosen K12, R2–R4 E. coli Strains. Materials 2020, 13, 5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kowalczyk, P.; Gawdzik, B.; Trzepizur, D.; Szymczak, M.; Skiba, G.; Raj, S.; Kramkowski, K.; Lizut, R.; Ostaszewski, R. δ -Lactones—A New Class of Compounds That Are Toxic to E. coli K12 and R2–R4 Strains. Materials 2021, 14, 2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gawdzik, B.; Kowalczyk, P.; Koszelewski, D.; Brodzka, A.; Masternak, J.; Kramkowski, K.; Wypych, A.; Ostaszewski, R. The Evaluation of DHPMs as Biotoxic Agents on Pathogen Bacterial Membranes. Membranes 2022, 12, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sahrawat, P.; Kowalczyk, P.; Koszelewski, D.; Szymczak, M.; Kramkowski, K.; Wypych, A.; Ostaszewski, R. Influence of Open Chain and Cyclic Structure of Peptidomimetics on Antibacterial Activity in E. coli Strains. Molecules 2022, 27, 3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kowalczyk, P.; Koszelewski, D.; Gawdzik, B.; Samsonowicz-Górski, J.; Kramkowski, K.; Wypych, A.; Lizut, R.; Ostaszewski, R. Promiscuous Lipase-Catalyzed Markovnikov Addition of H-Phosphites to Vinyl Esters for the Synthesis of Cytotoxic α -Acyloxy Phosphonate Derivatives. Materials 2022, 15, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kowalczyk, P.; Borkowski, A.; Czerwonka, G.; Cłapa, T.; Cieśla, J.; Misiewicz, A.; Borowiec, M.; Szala, M. The microbial toxicity of quaternary ammonium ionic liquids is dependent on the type of lipopolysaccharide. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 266, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Borkowski, A.; Kowalczyk, P.; Czerwonka, G.; Cieśla, J.; Cłapa, T.; Misiewicz, A.; Szala, M.; Drabik, M. Interaction of quaternary ammonium ionic liquids with bacterial membranes—Studies with Escherichia coli R1–R4-type lipopolysaccharides. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 246, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maciejewska, A.; Kaszowska, M.; Jachymek, W.; Lugowski, C.; Lukasiewicz, J. Lipopolysaccharide-linked Enterobacterial Common Antigen (ECALPS) Occurs in Rough Strains of Escherichia coli R1, R2, and R4. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Aedh, A.I.; Al-Swedan, A.D.; Mohammed, A.A.; Alwadai, B.M.; Alyami, A.Y.; Alsaaed, E.A.; Almurdhimah, N.M.; Zaki, M.S.; Othman, A.E.; Hasan, A. Occurrence of Multidrug-Resistant Strains of Acinetobacter spp.: An Emerging Threat for Nosocomial-Borne Infection in Najran Region, KSA. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Salmanov, A.; Shchehlov, D.; Artyomenko, V.; Svyrydiuk, O.; Maliarchuk, R.; Bortnik, I.; Mamonova, M.; Korniyenko, S.; Rud, V.; Gudym, M.; et al. Nosocomial transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms in Ukrainian hospitals: Results of a multi-centre study. J. Hosp. Infect. 2023, 132, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Connors, W.M.; Pihil, A.; Dounce, A.L.; Stotz, E.I. Purification of liver esterase. Biol. Chem. 1950, 184, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kublicki, M.; Koszelewski, D.; Brodzka, A.; Ostaszewski, R. Wheat germ lipase: Isolation, purification and applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 184–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 07609 g001 550
Figure 1. Biologically active antimicrobial coumarin and α-aminophosphonate derivatives.
Figure 1. Biologically active antimicrobial coumarin and α-aminophosphonate derivatives.
Ijms 24 07609 g001
Ijms 24 07609 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Enzyme-catalyzed synthesis of coumarin aminophosphonates 1–13.
Scheme 1. Enzyme-catalyzed synthesis of coumarin aminophosphonates 1–13.
Ijms 24 07609 sch001
Ijms 24 07609 g002 550
Figure 2. Reuse of the Novozym 435 catalyst.
Figure 2. Reuse of the Novozym 435 catalyst.
Ijms 24 07609 g002
Ijms 24 07609 g003 550
Figure 3. The synthesis of various coumarin α-aminophoshonates 1-13 under optimized conditions. Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1 mmol), 7-amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin (1 mmol), dimethyl phosphite (1 mmol), and Novozym 435 (80 mg) in neat for 18 h at 30 °C, 200 rpm. a 2-Me-THF (2 mL). Yields in brackets provided for isolated products 1–13.
Figure 3. The synthesis of various coumarin α-aminophoshonates 1-13 under optimized conditions. Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1 mmol), 7-amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin (1 mmol), dimethyl phosphite (1 mmol), and Novozym 435 (80 mg) in neat for 18 h at 30 °C, 200 rpm. a 2-Me-THF (2 mL). Yields in brackets provided for isolated products 1–13.
Ijms 24 07609 g003
Ijms 24 07609 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Plausible mechanism of CaLB lipase-catalyzed Kabachnik-Fields reaction.
Scheme 2. Plausible mechanism of CaLB lipase-catalyzed Kabachnik-Fields reaction.
Ijms 24 07609 sch002
Ijms 24 07609 g004 550
Figure 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the coumarin derivatives 1–14 in the model bacterial strains. The x-axis features compounds 1–14. The y-axis shows the MIC value in µg/mL. Investigated strains of E. coli K12 as control (blue), R2 strains (orange), R3 strain (grey), and R4 strain (yellow), Fpg overexpression strain (red bars). The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Figure 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the coumarin derivatives 1–14 in the model bacterial strains. The x-axis features compounds 1–14. The y-axis shows the MIC value in µg/mL. Investigated strains of E. coli K12 as control (blue), R2 strains (orange), R3 strain (grey), and R4 strain (yellow), Fpg overexpression strain (red bars). The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Ijms 24 07609 g004
Ijms 24 07609 g005 550
Figure 5. Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the coumarin derivatives. The x-axis features compounds 1–14. The y-axis shows the MIC value in µg/mL. Investigated strains of E. coli K12 as control (blue), R2 strains (orange), R3 strain (grey), and R4 strain (yellow), Fpg overexpression strain (red bars). The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Figure 5. Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the coumarin derivatives. The x-axis features compounds 1–14. The y-axis shows the MIC value in µg/mL. Investigated strains of E. coli K12 as control (blue), R2 strains (orange), R3 strain (grey), and R4 strain (yellow), Fpg overexpression strain (red bars). The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Ijms 24 07609 g005
Ijms 24 07609 g006 550
Figure 6. The ratio of MBC/MIC of the coumarin derivatives. The x-axis features compounds 1–14. The y-axis shows the MBC/MIC value in µg/mL. Investigated strains of E. coli K12 as control (blue), R2 strains (orange), R3 strain (grey), and R4 strain (yellow), Fpg overexpression strain (red bars). The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Figure 6. The ratio of MBC/MIC of the coumarin derivatives. The x-axis features compounds 1–14. The y-axis shows the MBC/MIC value in µg/mL. Investigated strains of E. coli K12 as control (blue), R2 strains (orange), R3 strain (grey), and R4 strain (yellow), Fpg overexpression strain (red bars). The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Ijms 24 07609 g006
Ijms 24 07609 g007 550
Figure 7. Percentage of plasmid DNA recognized by Fpg enzyme (y-axis) with model bacterial, K12, and R2–R4 strains (x-axis). All analyzed compounds numbered were statistically significant at <0.05 (see Table 2). The data are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2.
Figure 7. Percentage of plasmid DNA recognized by Fpg enzyme (y-axis) with model bacterial, K12, and R2–R4 strains (x-axis). All analyzed compounds numbered were statistically significant at <0.05 (see Table 2). The data are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2.
Ijms 24 07609 g007
Ijms 24 07609 g008 550
Figure 8. Examples of MIC with model bacterial strains K12, R2, R3, and R4 for studying antibiotics ciprofloxacin (cipro), bleomycin (bleo), and cloxacillin (clox). The x-axis features antibiotics used sequentially. The y-axis features the MIC value in µg/mL. The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Figure 8. Examples of MIC with model bacterial strains K12, R2, R3, and R4 for studying antibiotics ciprofloxacin (cipro), bleomycin (bleo), and cloxacillin (clox). The x-axis features antibiotics used sequentially. The y-axis features the MIC value in µg/mL. The order in which the compounds were applied to the plate are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Ijms 24 07609 g008
Ijms 24 07609 g009 550
Figure 9. Percentage of bacterial DNA recognized by Fpg enzyme in model bacterial strains after ciprofloxacin, bleomycin, and cloxacillin treatment. The compounds were statistically significant at p < 0.05.—(Supplementary Materials Figure S3).
Figure 9. Percentage of bacterial DNA recognized by Fpg enzyme in model bacterial strains after ciprofloxacin, bleomycin, and cloxacillin treatment. The compounds were statistically significant at p < 0.05.—(Supplementary Materials Figure S3).
Ijms 24 07609 g009
Table
Table 1. The Kabachnik–Fields reaction catalyzed by enzymes. a.Optimization studies.
Table 1. The Kabachnik–Fields reaction catalyzed by enzymes. a.Optimization studies.
EntryCatalystT (°C)SolventYield [%] f
1None30TBME<1
2Porcine pancreas lipase (PpL)30TBME52
3Novozym 43530TBME71
4Candida antarctica B lipase (CaLB)30TBME63
5Wheat germ lipase (WgL) b30TBME51
6Pseudomonas cepacia lipase (PcL)30TBME48
7Pseudomonas fluorescence lipase (PfL)30TBME37
8Candida cylindracea lipase (CcL)30TBME44
9Candida rugosa lipase (CrL)30TBME47
10Rhizomucor miehei lipase (RmL)30TBME23
11Pig liver acetone powder (PLAP) b30TBME59
12Novozym 43530-83 (85) g
13Novozym 435302-MeTHF81
14Novozym 43530EtOAc79
15Novozym 43530ethanol32
16Novozym 43520-75
17Novozym 43540-82
18Novozym 43550-76
19Novozym 435 c30-86
20Bovine serum albumin (BSA)30-8
21Denatured Candida antarctica B lipase d30TBME<1
22Cu-MOF e30-18
23CuI (MW irradiation) e30-42
24BF3-Et2O e30-31
25Amberlyst 15 e30-25
a Reaction conditions: benzaldehyde (1 mmol), 7-amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin (1 mmol), dimethyl phosphite (1 mmol), and enzyme (50 mg) in solvent (2 mL) for 18 h, 200 rpm. b Domestically prepared. c 80 mg of enzyme, d Thermally deactivated at 100 °C for 24 h. e 10 mol%. f Yield of the isolated product 1 after chromatography on silica gel. g Reaction time was 24 h.
Table
Table 2. Statistical analysis of all analyzed compounds by MIC, MBC, and MBC/MIC; <0.05 *, <0.01 **, <0.001 ***.
Table 2. Statistical analysis of all analyzed compounds by MIC, MBC, and MBC/MIC; <0.05 *, <0.01 **, <0.001 ***.
No. of Samples4, 5, 67, 8, 1011, 12, 14Type of Test
K12******MIC
R2******MIC
R3******MIC
R4******MIC
K12*******MBC
R2*******MBC
R3*******MBC
R4*******MBC
K12*******MBC/MIC
R2*******MBC/MIC
R3*******MBC/MIC
R4*******MBC/MIC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koszelewski, D.; Kowalczyk, P.; Brodzka, A.; Hrunyk, A.; Kramkowski, K.; Ostaszewski, R. Enzymatic Synthesis of a Novel Coumarin Aminophosphonates: Antibacterial Effects and Oxidative Stress Modulation on Selected E. coli Strains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087609

AMA Style

Koszelewski D, Kowalczyk P, Brodzka A, Hrunyk A, Kramkowski K, Ostaszewski R. Enzymatic Synthesis of a Novel Coumarin Aminophosphonates: Antibacterial Effects and Oxidative Stress Modulation on Selected E. coli Strains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koszelewski, Dominik, Paweł Kowalczyk, Anna Brodzka, Anastasiia Hrunyk, Karol Kramkowski, and Ryszard Ostaszewski. 2023. "Enzymatic Synthesis of a Novel Coumarin Aminophosphonates: Antibacterial Effects and Oxidative Stress Modulation on Selected E. coli Strains" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087609

APA Style

Koszelewski, D., Kowalczyk, P., Brodzka, A., Hrunyk, A., Kramkowski, K., & Ostaszewski, R. (2023). Enzymatic Synthesis of a Novel Coumarin Aminophosphonates: Antibacterial Effects and Oxidative Stress Modulation on Selected E. coli Strains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop