Next Article in Journal
Niche Complementarity and Resistance to Grazing Promote the Invasion Success of Sargassum horneri in North America
Next Article in Special Issue
Respiration by the Opportunistic Spionid Polychaete Streblospio gynobranchiata during Adjustment to and Recovery from Moderate Hypoxia
Previous Article in Journal
First Study on Marine Heterobranchia (Gastropoda, Mollusca) in Bangka Archipelago, North Sulawesi, Indonesia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Historical Shifts in Benthic Infaunal Diversity in the Northern Gulf of Mexico since the Appearance of Seasonally Severe Hypoxia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/d12020053
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species Composition and Distribution of Jellyfish in a Seasonally Hypoxic Estuary, Hood Canal, Washington

by
BethElLee Herrmann
* and
Julie E. Keister
School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Box 357940, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2020, 12(2), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020053
Submission received: 20 December 2019 / Revised: 23 January 2020 / Accepted: 24 January 2020 / Published: 29 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Effects of Hypoxia on Marine Food Webs and Ecosystems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seasonal hypoxia (≤2 mg dissolved oxygen L−1) can have detrimental effects on marine food webs. Recent studies indicate that some jellyfish can tolerate low oxygen and may have a competitive advantage over other zooplankton and fishes in those environments. We assessed community structure and distributions of cnidarian and ctenophore jellyfish in seasonally hypoxic Hood Canal, WA, USA, at four stations that differed in oxygen conditions. Jellyfish were collected in June through October 2012 and 2013 using full-water-column and discrete-depth net tows, concurrent with CTD casts to measure dissolved oxygen (DO). Overall, southern, more hypoxic, regions of Hood Canal had higher abundances and higher diversity than the northern regions, particularly during the warmer and more hypoxic year of 2013. Of fifteen species identified, the most abundant—the siphonophore Muggiaea atlantica and hydrozoan Aglantha digitale—reached peak densities > 1800 Ind m−3 and 38 Ind m−3, respectively. M. atlantica were much more abundant at the hypoxic stations, whereas A. digitale were also common in the north. Vertical distributions explored during hypoxia showed that jellyfish were mostly in the upper 10 m regardless of the oxycline depth. Moderate hypoxia seemed to have no detrimental effect on jellyfish in Hood Canal, and may have resulted in high population densities, which could influence essential fisheries and trophic energy flow.

1. Introduction

Jellyfish, gelatinous zooplankton of the phyla Cnidaria (scyphozoans and hydrozoans) and Ctenophora (comb jellies), inhabit most marine environments from coastal waters to the deep-sea [1]. Composed of ~95% water and <1% carbon [2], jellyfish can range in size from microns to meters [3,4]. They are slow moving, yet have advanced predatory capabilities which, combined with short generation times, can lead to rapid population growth [5]. Well documented jellyfish invasions, causing trophic cascades and devastating fisheries [6], have motivated researchers to carefully examine the drivers that have supported these taxa for more than 500 million years [2]. Still, jellyfish dynamics in marine ecosystems remain understudied, particularly those of the many small species that do not form conspicuous aggregations yet typically outnumber larger species.
Reports of jellyfish blooms have increased in recent years, especially around heavily populated coastlines, suggesting degraded environmental triggers [7,8]. Hypoxia (dissolved oxygen concentration ≤ 2 mg L−1) is one of the triggers that has been implicated in increasing blooms [9]. While many marine taxa cannot survive hypoxia for an extended time, displaying stress or avoidance, some jellyfish can store excess oxygen in their mesoglea, decreasing their vulnerability to low oxygen concentrations [10,11]. Their reproduction can also become more successful in low oxygen bottom-water as there is less benthic competition for space where jellyfish planulae settle [12]. Furthermore, their effectiveness as predators may be enhanced during hypoxia, enabling higher growth rates [13,14].
Many jellyfish are known to be voracious predators, consuming hundreds to thousands of prey items per day [15]. Jellyfish compete with fish for zooplankton prey, while some also prey directly on fish eggs and larvae [16], elevating their trophic role to that of apex predators [17]. Certain hydroids create grazing pressures on the benthos where they consume diatoms, fecal pellets, and sinking particulate organic matter [18], effectively infiltrating two of the most critical pathways in the trophic structure—primary producers (phytoplankton) and primary consumers (zooplankton). Thus, hypoxia-resistant jellyfish could proliferate and out-compete fish for prey [16], redirecting energy flow through food webs [19].
Hood Canal, a sub-basin of Puget Sound, Washington, is a taxonomically diverse region that seasonally experiences hypoxic conditions. Carved by the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet [20], Hood Canal’s ~185 m deep basin and narrow inlet is fronted on its ocean end by a shallow glacial sill that inhibits circulation [21], making it a highly conducive environment for oxygen depletion. These bathymetric features, coupled with strong stratification and high primary productivity in spring and summer, lead to a seasonal decrease in bottom-water dissolved oxygen [22]. Flushing events, driven by tides and winds, temporarily replenish oxygen in fall and winter [23]. Such events can displace warmer, less dense, hypoxic bottom-water to mid and surface layers [22]), periodically causing fish kills.
In this study, we examined the species composition and diversity of jellyfish in Hood Canal, and explored their seasonal and spatial patterns in relation to dissolved oxygen to better understand jellyfish community dynamics and responses to hypoxia. We studied taxa that range in size from a few millimeters to almost a meter in diameter. We hypothesized that jellyfish would show increased abundance and diversity in regions of Hood Canal that experience seasonal hypoxia, changes which could indicate high predation on zooplankton, a competitive advantage over fishes, and a resultant shift in energy flow through the ecosystem.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Methods

Sampling was conducted on 10 cruises spaced every fourth week from early June to early October in 2012 and 2013. Four stations were sampled on each cruise: Dabob Bay (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN) (Figure 1). These sites represent a gradient in dissolved oxygen levels; two sites, UN and HP, were at the southern end of Hood Canal where hypoxia typically develops in summer, and two in the northern region, DU and DB, where oxygen levels usually remain higher. Two types of net tows were conducted which sampled mesozooplankton, including mesoplankton jellyfish (0.2–20 mm), or megaplankton jellyfish (>20 mm), as defined by Omori and Ikeda [24]. Oblique tows were conducted for mesozooplankton from the R/V Clifford A. Barnes using a 0.25 m2 HydroBios MultiNet plankton sampler (five-net capacity) equipped with 200-μm mesh nets and inner and outer flow meters to measure the water volume filtered and monitor for clogging. On one occasion (at DB in July 2013), a vertical ring net tow (200-μm mesh, 0.6-m diameter) was used during a MultiNet failure. Tows were conducted through the whole water column (herein termed full-water-column tows) from 5 to 10 m off the bottom, either as one net or a set of 4–5 depth-stratified nets. Since many zooplankton perform diel vertical migration, the full-water-column net tows were used to assess populations of jellyfish independent of diel migrations. Depth-stratified tows were conducted in both day and night, with nets opened and closed at specific depths chosen from oxygen profiles to assess distributions in relation to dissolved oxygen (DO). All samples were preserved in 5% buffered formalin and returned to the laboratory for analysis.
Densities of gelatinous megaplankton (large jellyfish) were estimated from Marinovich midwater trawls (n = 149) conducted from the R/V Centennial using a 3.2-mm mesh codend, towed at a ship speed of 2–3 knots. Trawl depths were chosen based on where acoustic backscatter, monitored using a Simrad EK60 four-frequency system, was highest; trawls did not cover the entire water column, and set-depths varied with each trawl. The vertical opening of the trawl, estimated from Sensus Ultra depth probes deployed on the head and foot ropes, varied from 4.8 to 7.0 m; distance trawled was calculated from GPS points using the Spherical Law of Cosines and used with the adjusted net opening to calculate net volume (m3). Species identifications, abundances (number of Ind.), and wet weight mass (kg) were recorded on board immediately after collection, after which densities (number of Ind. per 100 m3) and biovolumes (mL per 100 m3) were averaged across multiple day and night tows within each station-month-year. As set-depths varied, and trawl volumes could not be accurately assessed due to changes in the opening during trawling, these data should be considered as an index of large jellyfish abundance, used only to explore broad temporal and spatial patterns.
Casts of an annually-calibrated SBE 911plus CTD equipped with a Niskin rosette, SBE 43 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) sensor, and WET Labs ECO-AFL/FL fluorometer were conducted at each station prior to each day and night sampling period. The DO sensor was additionally calibrated by titrations following the modified Winkler Method [25,26] on a Metrohm 765 Dosimat burette using discrete water samples collected from at least three depths per station.

2.2. Laboratory Methods

For this study, 40 full-water-column tows (one from each station-month-year combination) were analyzed for mesozooplankton and mesoplankton jellyfish species composition; in addition, 12 discrete-depth samples (three sets of four nets) were analyzed from where a portion of the water column was hypoxic to examine vertical distributions of jellyfish in relation to oxygen and prey distributions.
Samples were split with a Folsom splitter (for jellyfish) or quantitatively diluted and subsampled using Stempel pipettes (for small prey taxa). Great care was taken to keep jellyfish structures intact. Unfortunately, the delicate ctenophore, Pleurobrachia bachei, was often only observed in pieces, and therefore quantified or measured from their robust gut-lining. Taxa were quantified and identified to the lowest taxonomic level (genus/species), with the exception of the colonial siphonophore, Muggiaea atlantica, which was further identified to individual zooid types to separate gastric components (nectophores, eudoxids with bracts, and separated bracts) from reproductive components (separated gonophores). Separated gonophores were not included in total abundances as these are egg-bearing zooids within the colony that have no grazing impact on the prey community [27]. In addition, measurements of bell diameter and height were recorded. To analyze prey abundances, species were grouped by genera or higher taxonomic group (i.e., calanoid or cyclopoid copepods, amphipods, krill, etc.). Densities were calculated as # individuals m−3 (Ind m−3) using the volume of water filtered by each net.

2.3. Statistical Methods

Species richness (S), the Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H) [28], evenness (EH), and the Simpson’s Index of Diversity (D’) [29] were calculated to assess temporal and spatial patterns in mesoplankton jellyfish species diversity. Patterns in species composition were explored using Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS) ordinations in PC-ORD™ 7.06 [30]. Sørensen (Bray–Curtis) distance measures were calculated on a matrix of 13 jellyfish species in 40 full-water-column samples. To adjust for a broad range of very abundant to rare species, abundance data were normalized using [Log10 (Y + 0.001) + 3]. The use of (Y + 0.001) + 3 rather than (Y + 1) helped prevent distorting the relationship between zeros and small non-zero values in the dataset [31]. The stability of the final configuration was evaluated using a Monte Carlo Stress Test computing Mather’s [32] scaling and Kruskal’s [33] stress formula one, scaled from 0–100 as SR = 100√S. Following ordination, the data cloud was rigidly rotated to load the maximum variance in taxonomic composition along Axis 1. This rigid rotation did not affect the geometry of points in the ordination space or the total variance explained by the ordination, but simply realigned the ordination points such that the greatest dissimilarity in community structure among samples lay along the first axis [31]. To explore drivers of community variance, Pearson correlations were calculated between the axis values for species abundances and environmental variables: year; month; station (coded 1–4 from north to south); maximum, minimum, average, and values at 2-m and 30-m depths for temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, density, and fluorescence. In addition to the ordination, a Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA) with pairwise comparisons ([34]) was run in PC-ORD™ using Sørensen (Bray–Curtis) distance measures to test for differences between station pairs [31].

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Properties

Hood Canal was stratified from June to September in both years, typically with strong thermoclines and pycnoclines in the upper 10 m of the water column (Figure 2a). Overall, temperatures ranged from 8.2 to 21.5 °C and were 0.5–1.0 °C cooler in 2012 than 2013. Surface temperatures were often highest at DB, but showed no consistent pattern among the other stations. Deep water was typically 8–10 °C until intrusion of dense, warmer ocean water or wind-mixing warmed deep waters in fall. Deep waters were typically warmer at the northern stations than in the south in summer and particularly following the deep-water intrusions, by up to 1.3 °C difference in October 2012.
Oxygen concentrations showed a typical seasonal cycle of oxygen drawdown through summer, with lowest oxygen at the southern stations (Figure 2b). Oxygen mostly remained well above 4 mg L−1 at the two northern stations, but in late summer, much of the water column was below 4 mg L−1 at the southern stations. Oxygen did not drop to hypoxic levels in 2012 except at Union in October. However, hypoxia was present at Union and Hoodsport in August through October 2013. In 2013, bottom-water DO at Union reached a minimum of 1.7 mg DO L−1 at 75 m depth in August, 1.8 mg DO L−1 at 74 m depth in September, and was displaced upwards to a near-surface oxygen minimum layer in October (1.6–2.0 mg DO L−1 at 5–16 m).

3.2. Species Composition

Overall, fifteen taxa were identified in Hood Canal, several of which are known to be cruising or ambush predators: three scyphozoans, eleven hydrozoans (including two siphonophores), and one ctenophore (Table 1). The dominant species in the mesoplankton size range was Muggiaea atlantica—a colonial calycophoran siphonophore averaging ~5.4 mm nectophore bell height, with feeding component densities (nectophores, eudoxids with bracts, and separated bracts) orders of magnitude higher than all other species (peak densities > 1800 Ind m−3, Figure 3a; Table 1). Aglantha digitale and Clytia gregaria, both averaging > 4 mm, were the next most abundant species with maximum densities of 38 Ind m−3 and 18 Ind m−3, respectively (Figure 3b; Table 1). M. atlantica dominated the southern stations, especially during mid-summer to fall, whereas A. digitale dominated the northern stations in early summer. All other species were relatively rare at < 5 Ind m−3 (Figure 3c,d).
The seasonal timing of peak abundance varied by species, year, and station, with overall higher abundances at Union, and peak abundances occurring earlier in 2013 than in 2012 (Figure 4). Total mesoplankton jellyfish abundances were significantly higher in 2013 than 2012 (Figure 4), which was especially noticeable in the ten-fold increase of M. atlantica gastrozooids, A. digitale, and C. gregaria (Figure 3a,b). Several of the rarer taxa, including Leuckartiara sp., Proboscidactyla flavicirrata, and the physonect siphonophore Nanomia bijuga occurred most frequently in early summer at the southern stations and were more common in 2013. Euphysa sp. was found at the southern stations but only during the autumn months, whereas Obelia sp. and Rathkea sp. were only observed at southern stations in Fall 2012 (Figure 3c,d). An especially rare jellyfish, Geomackiea zephyrolata—described by Mills [35]—was only collected in three net tows, primarily at Union in August 2013 (Figure 3c). Pleurobrachia bachei, the only ctenophore in our collections, was observed at all stations, chiefly at Hoodsport and Union early summer and late fall in 2013; they were largely absent in 2012 (Figure 3d).
Aequorea victoria, the largest hydrozoan in Hood Canal, was rarely seen in the mesoplankton nets except in early summer at Hoodsport and Union (Figure 3d) yet dominated the abundance of megaplankton jellyfish collected by trawls in June and July of both years (Figure S1). The large scyphozoans, Aurelia labiata and Phacellophora camtschatica, were not collected in mesoplankton net tows, and only a few small Cyanea capillata were found. However, these taxa were frequently observed in the mid-water trawls. C. capillata was the only ubiquitous species, observed at all stations over the full sampling period, and typically dominated the megaplankton jellyfish biomass except in August when P. camtschatica dominated. A. labiata was not common, although it can be highly abundant throughout summer in other regions of Puget Sound, particularly in sheltered embayments [36,37].

3.3. NMS Ordinations

Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS) ordination resulted in a 3-dimensional solution with a final stress of 11. 7 and a cumulative variance explained of 89%. After final rotation, variability along Axis 1 explained 61% of the variance in community structure, with Axis 2 and 3 carrying only 15% and 14%, respectively. The ordination showed clear distinction in community structure at the southern (Hoodsport and Union) versus northern (Dabob and Duckabush) stations along Axis 1 in both years (Table 2; Figure 5a), with the largest separation between Union (positive on Axis 1) and Duckabush (most negative on Axis 1). The community at Hoodsport was more similar to Union; the community at Dabob Bay was more similar to Duckabush. Patterns among months were not well defined (Figure 5b). Minimum dissolved oxygen levels were also oriented positively along Axis 1 (Figure 5c), likely because of the position of the hypoxic locations of Hoodsport and Union on the axis. Communities were less tightly clustered (more dissimilar) in 2012 than 2013.
Species most strongly associated with Axis 1 were M. atlantica (r = 0.87), C. gregaria (r = 0.81), and P. flavicirrata (r = 0.67) (Table 2). All species except C. capillata were positively associated with Axis 1 (i.e., generally more abundant in samples toward the top of the ordination). A. digitale and P. bachei were weakly associated with Axis 2 (r = 0.59 and r = −0.56, respectively), and Leuckartiara sp. positively correlated with Axis 3 (r = 0.62). Few environmental variables correlated with community variance along the axes. The strongest correlation was between Axis 1 and station (r = 0.57), capturing the observed separation of the stations; dissolved oxygen at 30-m depth was weakly correlated (r = −0.49) (Table S1). Average temperature through the water column was associated with community variance along Axis 2 (r = −0.60), with warmer temperatures in autumn following ocean intrusions (Figure 2). Crustacean prey were also negatively correlated with Axis 2 (r = −0.46). No environmental variables correlated well with Axis 3 (Table S1).
PerMANOVA results indicated a significant difference in jellyfish communities among stations (F = 5.79, p = 0.0002). Pairwise comparisons identified significant differences between all station pairs (p < 0.011 in all comparisons) except UN and HP which did not statistically differ (t = 1.14, p = 0.28). Communities also differed between 2012 and 2013 (F = 3.63, p = 0.009), and there was a significant interaction between Year and Station (F = 2.15, p = 0.02).

3.4. Species Diversity

Species richness, evenness, and diversity of mesoplankton jellyfish varied temporally and among stations (Figure 6). Between one and eight species were collected per sampling event; the maximum number at Union and the minimum at Duckabush, where at times, only 1–2 species were found. At the southern stations (UN and HP), the three metrics (S, EH, and H) approximately tracked each other over time, whereas the two northern stations (DB and DU) were more varied, particularly in diversity. In 2012, DB was similar to UN and HP in species richness yet diverged in evenness and diversity over the season. In 2013, there was a clearer separation of the two northern from the two southern stations. Species richness declined at both northern stations, but was more stable at the southern stations, over the season before all increased slightly in October (Figure 6a). Conversely, species evenness and diversity were higher at the northern stations in 2013, and lower at the southern stations (Figure 6b,c), especially in July and August when M. atlantica was particularly abundant in the south.

3.5. Vertical Distributions

Daytime vertical distributions of jellyfish examined at Union during hypoxia showed decreased abundances with depth, specifically for the dominant taxa M. atlantica, C. gregaria, and A. digitale (Figure 7). Overall, >80% of the community occupied the top 20 m of the water column (Figure S2). This was true even in October when a strong oxygen minimum layer was present near surface at ~5–16 m depth, which was sampled by a net towed over 6–10 m depths (Figure 7c and Figure S2b). Several jellyfish species were more abundant in the most hypoxic water layer (6–10 m) than above or below. These included the hydrozoans Euphysa sp., Rathkea sp., Leuckartiara sp., and ctenophore P. bachei. Another hydrozoan, P. flavicirrata, was also relatively abundant in the hypoxic layer, although less so than in the 10–20 m layer (Figure 7c). A. digitale and Rathkea sp. were more evenly distributed throughout the water column than most taxa (Figure 3). The rare G. zephyrolata was only present below 20 m, whereas Obelia sp. were only sampled in the top 10 m (Figure 7).
The most abundant potential prey collected were copepods, early life stages of euphausiids (mainly eggs and nauplii), barnacle larvae, and ostracods. Vertical distributions of prey closely matched the jellyfish distributions in August and September when both were most abundant in the surface layer and declined with depth (Figure S3a,b), a pattern that was particularly pronounced in September when barnacles and euphausiids were highly abundant near surface. In October, prey distribution did not match jellyfish as well—prey were concentrated deeper, in the 6–10 m hypoxic layer and in the 10–20 m depth layer (Figure S3c). Majority of prey were less abundant in deep hypoxic water in August and September, but most abundant in the mid-water hypoxic layer in October. Notably high abundances of copepods were aggregated in the hypoxic 6–10 m layer in October. Harpacticoid copepods occupied mid-depth layers each month. Ostracods were consistently found at deeper depths, regardless of oxygen conditions.

4. Discussion

4.1. Trophic Roles

Jellyfish can be voracious predators capable of asserting significant predation pressure on plankton communities, particularly when in high abundance. Most of the jellyfish species identified in Hood Canal were rare, with densities < 5 Ind m−3, but the dominant species, Aequorea victoria and Muggiaea atlantica, likely exerted a strong influence on their prey during their peak abundances.
M. atlantica are complex siphonophores existing either as colonies comprised of several zooid components, including a nectophore and multiple eudoxids, or as separated free-swimming eudoxids [27,38]. M. atlantica feed primarily on copepods, though other prey are consumed [39]. Despite the diminutive size of individual components, a colony with extended tentacles can cover a broad volume; a single nectophore with several gastrozooids consumes ~5–10 prey per day during non-growth stages; while growing, this rate can more than double, especially when prey are abundant [27]. In 2013, M. atlantica abundance (nectophores plus separated bracts) increased from 47 to 1859 Ind m−3 between our June and July sampling at Union, indicating a strong growth phase which was also evident from the high densities (1647 m−3) of reproductive gonophores. Based on their July nectophore densities and colony feeding rates from Purcell [27], their potential predation could have reached ~3400 prey m−3 d−1. Copepod density was ~5000 m−3 at Union in July 2013, which declined to <1000 m−3 by August (data shown in [40]) potentially indicating the effect of the siphonophores’ predation. When oxygen is low, jellyfish may have even higher predatory potential if escape abilities of their prey are diminished relative to jellyfish swimming and feeding behaviors [14].
In addition to copepods, jellyfish can put significant predation pressure on gelatinous and other soft-bodied taxa. Studies have reported that Aequorea and Aurelia can dramatically reduce fish eggs and larvae [41,42] and larvaceans [15]. Intraguild predation is also common. Predation of P. camtschatica on A. labiata has been reported [37], as has predation of A. victoria on M. atlantica, a favorite prey item [43,44]. A. victoria has also been known to prey on the ctenophore Pleurobrachia bachei and more than nine other hydrozoans, including Aglantha digitale and the physonect Nanomia bijuga [45]. In Hood Canal, A. victoria occupied Union and Hoodsport in very high numbers (>1000 Ind over a ~1.3 km tow) during June of both years, but diminished by July, around the time when the M. atlantica population dramatically increased. The reasons for the seasonal decline in A. victoria are unclear, but the result may have been released predation pressure on M. atlantica, allowing their bloom. The co-occurrence of taxa raises the question of whether their interactions release predation pressure on crustacean zooplankton through intraguild predation, or whether they primarily compete for mesozooplankton prey.

4.2. Vertical Distributions

Jellyfish vary in their hypoxia tolerance [10,11], and some species may even avoid very low oxygen levels [46]. Of species studied in Puget Sound, M. atlantica has the lowest critical oxygen partial pressure (Pcrit ~0.2 mg L−1 at 10 °C, 30 psu), indicating high hypoxia tolerance, whereas Euphysa flammea has the highest Pcrit (~1.8 mg L−1) [11]. In our study, daytime vertical distributions did not reflect those tolerances. M. atlantica primarily occupied upper layers of the water column, even when oxygen through the full water column was above their Pcrit level. Euphysa sp. was more patchily distributed but did not appear to avoid hypoxic water, and was in highest abundance in the most hypoxic layer in October although existing oxygen levels were below their Pcrit. Additionally, that M. atlantica was most abundant near surface during daytime suggests they were not performing diel vertical migration (DVM), contrary to reports that many jellyfish do, including other species of Muggiaea [47,48,49].
It is likely the jellyfish distributions reflected their prey’s vertical distributions rather than oxygen. Crustacean prey taxa which also commonly conduct DVM were dense near surface in the daytime when deep water was hypoxic. This contrast from expected daytime distributions is perplexing as it suggests the zooplankton sensed and avoided hypoxia, but in October, they were most abundant in the near-surface hypoxic layer where oxygen was 1.5–1.8 mg L−1. Some reports of geographic differences in copepod response imply that only populations that inhabit historically hypoxic regions will move to avoid hypoxia [50], but Hood Canal has been hypoxic for hundreds of years [51]. There are wide differences in behavioral response to hypoxia among species in Hood Canal [52], consequently more specific taxonomic information could help explain patterns observed in this study.
Species differences in behavior can lead to changes in vertical overlap and encounters between predators and their prey, as well as changes in prey capture success. In Chesapeake Bay, overlap between ctenophores and their prey decreases as copepods and fish larvae move up to avoid hypoxic depths where ctenophores remain within [46,53]. Simultaneously, overlap with the sea nettle Chrysaora increases as it moved up with its prey, compressing into upper layers and resulting in higher encounter rates [46]. For taxa which remain in hypoxic water, differential susceptibility to hypoxia can alter encounter outcomes. The medusae Aurelia aurita [42] and Chrysaora quinquecirrha [13], and the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi [53], all increase predation rates on fish larvae and zooplankton under low oxygen as their prey’s escape abilities decline.

4.3. Abundance and Community Patterns

The pattern of higher jellyfish abundances and species richness at the southern stations indicate that those locations may be reproduction or grazing hotspots for gelatinous zooplankton. Notably, every species collected was more abundant in southern Hood Canal, and two (Obelia and Rathkea) were exclusively found there. Species distributions were likely influenced by the distance from the canal’s inlet, hydrographic conditions, and the degree of anthropogenic disturbance to the ecosystem, all of which differ along the axis of the canal. That Dabob and Duckabush were more variable in species composition, as shown by the NMS ordination, but lower in species richness, may indicate that advective exchange with water outside of the canal is important. One study regarding circulation and the swimming behavior of Cyanea capillata in Hood Canal indicated that southern Hood Canal may be a sink for the large medusae [54]. Another trawl study of jellyfish found that large scyphozoan medusae are less abundant north of Puget Sound [55]. Moreover, forage fish and jellyfish showed opposite gradients in distributions, suggesting competitive or trophic interactions.
For the most part, the environmental metrics that we measured did not statistically correlate with community structure. Although the southern communities separated from those in the north, average temperature (primarily reflecting sub-thermocline temperature) was the only environmental correlate with NMS axes. Oxygen did not emerge as an important correlate with the ordination axes. The more hypoxic stations clearly supported a higher variety of species and higher abundances, but that was true even when oxygen was relatively high; most species were less abundant during hypoxic months. Perhaps hypoxia primes the system for successful jellyfish populations the following year, e.g., by reducing competition over winter, or that other conditions associated with the development of hypoxia also promote jellyfish, e.g., sluggish circulation. Overall, hypoxia did not seem to have a detrimental effect on gelatinous zooplankton, and could have been beneficial through food web processes, likely with influences on resident fish and zooplankton communities.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/12/2/53/s1: Table S1: Pearson correlations between environmental variables and NMS ordination axes. Figure S1: Midwater trawl megaplankton jellyfish distributions, Figure S2: Vertical distributions of mesoplankton jellyfish and crustacean prey taxa, Figure S3: Daytime vertical distribution of crustacean prey taxa.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.H. and J.E.K.; Methodology, B.H. and J.E.K.; Investigation, B.H. and J.E.K.; Formal analysis, B.H. and J.E.K.; Data Curation, B.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, B.H.; Writing—Review & Editing, B.H. and J.E.K.; Project Administration, J.E.K.; Funding Acquisition, J.E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants #OCE-1154648 and OCE-1657992.

Acknowledgments

We thank Claudia Mills for assistance with species identification; the UW Marine Chemistry Laboratory for oxygen titrations; T. Essington, P. Moriarty, and M. Sato for mid-water trawl data; Captain R. McQuin, L. Tuttle, the ship crew, and numerous volunteers who assisted with sampling on the R/V Clifford Barnes. This study comprised the thesis research of B. Herrmann as partial fulfillment of a B.S. degree in Oceanography at the University of Washington.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Larson, R.J.; Madin, L.P.; Harbison, G.R. In situ observations of deepwater medusae in the genus Deepstaria, with a description of D. reticulum, sp. nov. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1988, 68, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pitt, K.A.; Duarte, C.M.; Lucas, C.H.; Sutherland, K.R.; Condon, R.H.; Mianzan, H.; Purcell, J.E.; Robinson, K.L.; Uye, S. Jellyfish body plans provide allometric advantages beyond low carbon content. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mills, C.E.; Marques, A.C.; Migotto, A.E.; Calder, D.R.; Hand, C. Hydrozoa: Polyps, Hydromedusae, and Siphonophora. In The Light and Smith Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates from Central California to Oregon, 4th ed.; Carlton, J.T., Ed.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 118–188. ISBN 978-0520239395. [Google Scholar]
  4. Agassiz, E.C.C.; Agassiz, A. Seaside Studies in Natural History: Marine Animals of Massachusetts Bay, Radiates, 1st ed.; Ticknor and Fields: Boston, MA, USA, 1865; p. 39. [Google Scholar]
  5. Parsons, T.R.; Lalli, C.M. Jellyfish population explosions: Revisiting a hypothesis of possible causes. La Mer 2002, 40, 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  6. Greve, W. The 1989 German Bight invasion of Muggiaea atlantica. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1994, 51, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Uye, S. Human forcing of the copepod–fish–jellyfish triangular trophic relationship. Hydrobiologia 2011, 666, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ishii, H. The influence of environmental changes upon the coastal plankton ecosystems, with special reference to mass occurrence of jellyfish. Bull. Plankt. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 48, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  9. Purcell, J.E.; Breitburg, D.L.; Decker, M.B.; Graham, W.M.; Youngbluth, M.J.; Raskoff, K.A. Pelagic Cnidarians and Ctenophores in low dissolved oxygen environments: A review. In Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; pp. 77–100. [Google Scholar]
  10. Thuesen, E.V. Intragel oxygen promotes hypoxia tolerance of scyphomedusae. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208, 2475–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rutherford, L.; Thuesen, E. Metabolic performance and survival of medusae in estuarine hypoxia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2005, 294, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ishii, H.; Ohba, T.; Kobayashi, T. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on planula settlement, polyp growth and asexual reproduction of Aurelia aurita. Plankt. Benthos Res. 2008, 3, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Breitburg, D.L. Behavioral response of fish larvae to low dissolved oxygen concentrations in a stratified water column. Mar. Biol. 1994, 120, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Breitburg, D.L.; Loher, T.; Pacey, C.A.; Gerstein, A. Varying effects of low dissolved oxygen on trophic interactions in an estuarine food web. Ecol. Monogr. 1997, 67, 489–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Purcell, J.E. Predation on zooplankton by large jellyfish, Aurelia labiata, Cyanea capillata and Aequorea aequorea, in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003, 246, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Purcell, J.E.; Arai, M.N. Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: A review. Hydrobiologia 2001, 451, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Boero, F.; Bouillon, J.; Gravili, C.; Miglietta, M.; Parsons, T.; Piraino, S. Gelatinous plankton: Irregularities rule the world (sometimes). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 356, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Orejas, C.; Rossi, S.; Peralba, À.; García, E.; Gili, J.M.; Lippert, H. Feeding ecology and trophic impact of the hydroid Obelia dichotoma in the Kongsfjorden (Spitsbergen, Arctic). Polar Biol. 2013, 36, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pitt, K.A.; Welsh, D.T.; Condon, R.H. Influence of jellyfish blooms on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling and plankton production. Hydrobiologia 2009, 616, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Porter, S.C.; Swanson, T.W. Radiocarbon age constraints on rates of advance and retreat of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet during the last glaciation. Quat. Res. 1998, 50, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gregg, M.C.; Pratt, L.J. Flow and hydraulics near the sill of Hood Canal, a strongly sheared, continuously stratified fjord. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2010, 40, 1087–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Newton, J.; Bassin, C.; Devol, A.; Kawase, M.; Ruef, W.; Warner, M.; Hannafious, D.; Rose, R. Hypoxia in Hood Canal: An overview of status and contributing factors. In Proceedings of the 2007 Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 26–29 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cannon, G.A. Observations of bottom-water flushing in a fjord-like estuary. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 1975, 3, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Omori, M.; Ikeda, T. Methods in Marine Zooplankton Ecology; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 0-471-80107-0. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carpenter, J.H. The accuracy of the Winkler Method for dissolved oxygen analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1965, 10, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carpenter, J.H. The Chesapeake Bay Institute technique for the Winkler dissolved oxygen method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1965, 10, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Purcell, J.E. Feeding and growth of the siphonophore Muggiaea atlantica (Cunningham 1893). J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 1982, 62, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Simpson, E.H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949, 163, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McCune, B.; Mefford, M.J. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data; Version 7.0 for Windows; Wild Blueberry Media: Corvallis, OR, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. McCune, B.; Grace, J.B. Analysis of Ecological Communities; MJM Software Design: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 2002; ISBN 0-9721290-0-6. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mather, P.M. Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography; John Wiley & Sons: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kruskal, J.B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964, 29, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anderson, M.J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001, 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mills, C.E. A new hydrozoan, Geomackiea zephyrolata gen. nov., sp. nov. (Anthomedusae: Pandeidae), from inland marine waters of British Columbia and Washington State. Can. J. Zool. 1985, 63, 2172–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Keister, J.E. Unpublished work. 2020.
  37. Towanda, T.; Thuesen, E. Ectosymbiotic behavior of Cancer gracilis and its trophic relationships with its host Phacellophora camtschatica and the parasitoid Hyperia medusarum. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 315, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Blackett, M.; Licandro, P.; Coombs, S.H.; Lucas, C.H. Long-term variability of the siphonophores Muggiaea atlantica and M. kochi in the Western English Channel. Prog. Oceanogr. 2014, 128, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Purcell, J.E. Dietary composition and diel feeding patterns of epipelagic siphonophores. Mar. Biol. 1981, 65, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Keister, J.E.; Winans, A.K.; Herrmann, B. Zooplankton community response to seasonal hypoxia: A test of three hypotheses. Diversity 2020, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Purcell, J.E. Predation on fish larvae and eggs by the hydromedusa Aequorea victoria at a herring spawning ground in British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46, 1415–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shoji, J.; Masuda, R.; Yamashita, Y.; Tanaka, M. Effect of low dissolved oxygen concentrations on behavior and predation rates on red sea bream Pagrus major larvae by the jellyfish Aurelia aurita and by juvenile spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius. Mar. Biol. 2005, 147, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mapstone, G.M. Siphonophore (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from Canadian Pacific Waters; NRC Research Press: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2009; ISBN 90-73239-68-0. [Google Scholar]
  44. Purcell, J.E. Predation by Aequorea victoria on other species of potentially competing pelagic hydrozoans. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1991, 72, 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  45. Purcell, J.E. A review of cnidarians and ctenophores feeding on competitors in the plankton. Hydrobiologia 1991, 216, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Keister, J.E.; Houde, E.D.; Breitburg, D.L. Effects of bottom-layer hypoxia on abundances and depth distributions of organisms in Patuxent River, Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 205, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Decker, M.B.; Cieciel, K.; Zavolokin, A.; Lauth, R.; Brodeur, R.D.; Coyle, K.O. Population fluctuations of jellyfish in the Bering Sea and their ecological role in this productive shelf ecosystem. In Jellyfish Blooms; Pitt, K.A., Lucas, C.H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 153–183. ISBN 978-94-007-7014-0. [Google Scholar]
  48. Haraldsson, M.; Båmstedt, U.; Tiselius, P.; Titelman, J.; Aksnes, D.L. Evidence of diel vertical migration in Mnemiopsis leidyi. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Nogueira, M., Jr.; Brandini, F.P.; Codina, J.C.U. Diel vertical dynamics of gelatinous zooplankton (Cnidaria, Ctenophora and Thaliacea) in a subtropical stratified ecosystem (South Brazilian Bight). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Decker, M.B.; Breitburg, D.L.; Marcus, N.H. Geographical differences in behavioral responses to hypoxia: Local adaptation to an anthropogenic stressor? Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brandenberger, J.M.; Louchouarn, P.; Crecelius, E.A. Natural and post-urbanization signatures of hypoxia in two basins of Puget Sound: Historical reconstruction of redox sensitive metals and organic matter inputs. Aquat. Geochem. 2011, 17, 645–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Keister, J.E.; Tuttle, L.B. Effects of bottom-layer hypoxia on spatial distributions and community structure of mesozooplankton in a sub-estuary of Puget Sound, Washington, U.S.A. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2013, 58, 667–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Decker, M.B.; Breitburg, D.; Purcell, J. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on zooplankton predation by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 280, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moriarty, P.; Andrews, K.; Harvey, C.; Kawase, M. Vertical and horizontal movement patterns of scyphozoan jellyfish in a fjord-like estuary. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012, 455, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Rice, C.A.; Duda, J.J.; Greene, C.M.; Karr, J.R. Geographic patterns of fishes and jellyfish in Puget Sound surface waters. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2012, 4, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diversity 12 00053 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of Hood Canal in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Stations sampled in 2012 and 2013 represent a range in dissolved oxygen conditions from north to south: Dabob (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN).
Figure 1. Map of Hood Canal in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Stations sampled in 2012 and 2013 represent a range in dissolved oxygen conditions from north to south: Dabob (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN).
Diversity 12 00053 g001
Diversity 12 00053 g002 550
Figure 2. Seasonal profiles of (a) temperature (°C) and (b) dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg L−1) at Dabob (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN). Red indicates higher temperatures and dissolved oxygen concentrations, while blue indicates lower temperatures and dissolved oxygen concentrations ≤ 2.0 mg L−1.
Figure 2. Seasonal profiles of (a) temperature (°C) and (b) dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg L−1) at Dabob (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN). Red indicates higher temperatures and dissolved oxygen concentrations, while blue indicates lower temperatures and dissolved oxygen concentrations ≤ 2.0 mg L−1.
Diversity 12 00053 g002
Diversity 12 00053 g003 550
Figure 3. Temporal and spatial patterns in species abundances (Ind m−3) of (a) dominant, Muggiaea atlantica, (b) more abundant, (c) rare, and (d) very rare jellyfish at four stations in Hood Canal. M. atlantica’s individual predatory gastrozooids are separated by color (nectophores versus eudoxids/bracts). Species with less than 4 occurrences were not plotted. Note different x-axis scales and log-scaling of (a).
Figure 3. Temporal and spatial patterns in species abundances (Ind m−3) of (a) dominant, Muggiaea atlantica, (b) more abundant, (c) rare, and (d) very rare jellyfish at four stations in Hood Canal. M. atlantica’s individual predatory gastrozooids are separated by color (nectophores versus eudoxids/bracts). Species with less than 4 occurrences were not plotted. Note different x-axis scales and log-scaling of (a).
Diversity 12 00053 g003
Diversity 12 00053 g004 550
Figure 4. Total mesoplankton jellyfish abundances (Ind m−3) at four stations in Hood Canal (a) Dabob, (b) Duckabush, (c) Hoodsport, and (d) Union during June through August 2012 and 2013, colored by station. ‘H’ indicates stations with bottom-water or mid-layer hypoxia (≤2.0 mg DO L−1).
Figure 4. Total mesoplankton jellyfish abundances (Ind m−3) at four stations in Hood Canal (a) Dabob, (b) Duckabush, (c) Hoodsport, and (d) Union during June through August 2012 and 2013, colored by station. ‘H’ indicates stations with bottom-water or mid-layer hypoxia (≤2.0 mg DO L−1).
Diversity 12 00053 g004
Diversity 12 00053 g005 550
Figure 5. Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination of mesoplankton jellyfish composition in Hood Canal showing Axis 1 vs. Axis 2 (left panels) and Axis 1 vs. Axis 3 (right panels). Symbols are coded by year (2012 as open diamonds; 2013 as closed circles) and colored by (a) station, (b) month, or (c) minimum dissolved oxygen concentration within the water column.
Figure 5. Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination of mesoplankton jellyfish composition in Hood Canal showing Axis 1 vs. Axis 2 (left panels) and Axis 1 vs. Axis 3 (right panels). Symbols are coded by year (2012 as open diamonds; 2013 as closed circles) and colored by (a) station, (b) month, or (c) minimum dissolved oxygen concentration within the water column.
Diversity 12 00053 g005
Diversity 12 00053 g006 550
Figure 6. Seasonal changes in (a) species richness, (b) species evenness, and (c) Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index from the four stations Dabob (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN) in 2012 and 2013.
Figure 6. Seasonal changes in (a) species richness, (b) species evenness, and (c) Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index from the four stations Dabob (DB), Duckabush (DU), Hoodsport (HP), and Union (UN) in 2012 and 2013.
Diversity 12 00053 g006
Diversity 12 00053 g007 550
Figure 7. Daytime vertical distributions of mesoplankton jellyfish (Ind m−3) during hypoxic events at Union in (a) August, (b) September, and (c) October 2013 with corresponding CTD profiles of dissolved oxygen (mg L−1). Depth range sampled by each net is indicated in panels using horizontal grey lines and blue dashed arrows. Vertical red lines indicate 2 mg L−1 dissolved oxygen. Note that hypoxic water was present in deep water in August and September, but near surface in October. Note the log scaling of densities.
Figure 7. Daytime vertical distributions of mesoplankton jellyfish (Ind m−3) during hypoxic events at Union in (a) August, (b) September, and (c) October 2013 with corresponding CTD profiles of dissolved oxygen (mg L−1). Depth range sampled by each net is indicated in panels using horizontal grey lines and blue dashed arrows. Vertical red lines indicate 2 mg L−1 dissolved oxygen. Note that hypoxic water was present in deep water in August and September, but near surface in October. Note the log scaling of densities.
Diversity 12 00053 g007
Table
Table 1. Average diameter (D), bell height (H), number measured (n), and predation method of megaplankton and mesoplankton species collected from Hood Canal. Note only sizes of mesoplanktonic species are given.
Table 1. Average diameter (D), bell height (H), number measured (n), and predation method of megaplankton and mesoplankton species collected from Hood Canal. Note only sizes of mesoplanktonic species are given.
Class/Order
Genus species		Life History StagenAvg D (mm)Avg H (mm)Predation Method
Scyphozoa
Aurelia auritaMedusa---Cruising ★
Cyanea capillataMedusa---Cruising ★
Phacellophora camtschaticaMedusa---Cruising ★
Hydrozoa
Aequorea victoriaMedusa1936.637.68Cruising ★
Aglantha digitaleMedusa10802.814.36Ambush ★★
Clytia gregariaMedusa3584.921.82Cruising ★★
Euphysa sp.Medusa1460.791-
Geomackiea zephyrolataMedusa251.51.49-
Leuckartiara sp.Medusa1172.262.76Ambush ★★
Obelia sp.Medusa400.720.32-
Proboscidactyla flavicirrataMedusa2273.362.23-
Rathkea sp.Medusa790.720.59-
Siphonophora
Muggiaea atlanticaNectophore9842.065.42Ambush ★★
Bract8910.991.33
Eudoxid5410.892.22
Gonophore17380.961.65
Nanomia bijugaNectophore752.853.15Ambush ★★
Ctenophora
Pleurobrachia bacheiAdult953.884.16Ambush ★★
Predation methods based on ★(Purcell and Arai 2001) and ★★(Colin et al. 2003).
Table
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and correlations (R2) between jellyfish and the NMS ordination axes. Taxa strongly correlated with each axis (R2 > 0.3) are in bold. Total cumulative R2 of the ordination is given as CUM R2.
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and correlations (R2) between jellyfish and the NMS ordination axes. Taxa strongly correlated with each axis (R2 > 0.3) are in bold. Total cumulative R2 of the ordination is given as CUM R2.
CUM R2 = 0.89Axis 1
(R2 = 0.61)		 Axis 2
(R2 = 0.15)		 Axis 3
(R2 = 0.14)
rR2 rR2 rR2
Aequorea victoria0.30.09 00 0.270.08
Aglantha digitale0.410.17 0.590.35 0.080.01
Clytia gregaria0.810.65 0.120.01 −0.30.09
Cyanea capillata−0.160.03 0.370.14 −0.180.03
Euphysa sp.0.390.16 −0.230.05 −0.470.22
Geomackiea zephyrolata0.290.09 0.060 −0.060
Leuckartiara sp.0.520.27 −0.10.01 0.620.38
Muggiaea atlantica0.870.75 −0.060 0.250.06
Nanomia bijuga0.010 0.430.18 0.350.12
Obelia sp.0.220.05 0.240.06 −0.370.14
Pleurobrachia bachei0.360.13 −0.560.32 −0.030
Proboscidactyla flavicirrata0.670.44 0.220.05 0.460.22
Rathkea sp.0.240.06 0.060 −0.110.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Herrmann, B.; Keister, J.E. Species Composition and Distribution of Jellyfish in a Seasonally Hypoxic Estuary, Hood Canal, Washington. Diversity 2020, 12, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020053

AMA Style

Herrmann B, Keister JE. Species Composition and Distribution of Jellyfish in a Seasonally Hypoxic Estuary, Hood Canal, Washington. Diversity. 2020; 12(2):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Herrmann, BethElLee, and Julie E. Keister. 2020. "Species Composition and Distribution of Jellyfish in a Seasonally Hypoxic Estuary, Hood Canal, Washington" Diversity 12, no. 2: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020053

APA Style

Herrmann, B., & Keister, J. E. (2020). Species Composition and Distribution of Jellyfish in a Seasonally Hypoxic Estuary, Hood Canal, Washington. Diversity, 12(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop