Next Article in Journal
Data-Driven Recommendations for Establishing Threshold Values for the NIS Trend Indicator in the Mediterranean Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
Prey Selectivity in Juvenile Red King Crabs from the Coastal Barents Sea
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acid Changes in Nearshore Phytoplankton under Anthropogenic Impact as a Biodiversity Risk Factor for the World’s Deepest Lake Baikal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trophic Niche Dynamics and Diet Partitioning of King Crab Lithodes santolla in Chile’s Sub-Antarctic Water

1
Laboratorio de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas 6210427, Chile
2
Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Punta Arenas 6210549, Chile
3
Centro de Estudios del Hombre Austral, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas 6210427, Chile
4
Laboratorio Costero de Calfuco, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
5
Centro de Investigación de Dinámica de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL), Valdivia 5090000, Chile
6
Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP), Coyhaique 5951601, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010056
Submission received: 24 December 2021 / Revised: 11 January 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2022 / Published: 15 January 2022

Abstract

:
The southern king crab Lithodes santolla is one of the most economically important fishery species in the southern waters of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. A combination of stomach content and stable isotope analyses was used to reveal the potential dietary characteristics, isotopic niche, overlap among maturity stages and sexes, and trophic relationships of an L. santolla population in the Nassau Bay, Cape Horn region. Stable isotope analyses indicated that L. santolla assimilated energy from a basal carbon source, the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera, forming the trophic baseline of the benthic food web. Moreover, the trophic position of L. santolla varied among late juveniles and adults, suggesting that the southern king crab does undergo an ontogenetic diet shift. L. santolla exhibited intraspecific isotopic niche variation, reflecting niche differentiation which allows the species to partition resources. The trophic relationships of L. santolla with the associated fauna suggested some potential interactions for food resources/habitat use when they are limited. This study is the first attempt to characterize the trophic dynamics of the southern king crab in the Cape Horn area and, by generating more data, contributes to the conservation of the king crab population and the long-term management of local fisheries that rely on this resource.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Large stocks of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla (Molina, 1782) (Decapoda, Lithodidae) are distributed along coastal waters and fjords in the sub-Antarctic Magellan and Cape Horn region, at the southern tip of South America. Currently, the species has very high economic value, depending on small-scale local artisanal fisheries that have, however, generated dynamic histories of overfishing and governmental management. It is considered a high-status seafood source and a gastronomic footprint for tourism [1]. The modern history of its exploitation shows a peak towards the beginning of the 21st century. Previously, in the 1950s, it was only subject to local consumption and rapidly started to acquire significant status within regional gastronomy during the following decade. Then, since the late 1970s, it has had a consistent exploitation and high valuation as an export product for elite consumption (Mateo Martinic, 2022, personal communcation).
For more than 40 years, many biological studies aiming to improve L. santolla fisheries’ knowledge have been made [2,3,4,5,6,7], there is limited knowledge about the species’ trophic ecology relationship to the habitat that the species uses [8,9]. It is important to note that trophic ecology information is crucial for the design and planning of ecosystem-based management strategies of the Chilean benthic fishery [10]. In addition, a holistic approach to studying trophic relationships in terms of prey availability and predator–prey interactions among species in a particular area is critical to understanding their ability to co-exist [11,12].
Between 2010 and 2016, annual landings of southern king crab in Chilean fisheries ranged from 3022 to 5193 t, while in 2019, landings were less than 3000 t per year, the lowest figure recorded so far [13]. This suggests a decline in king crab natural abundances, which could be primarily attributed to overfishing [1]. Hence, major consequences for trophic dynamics and food web structure can be expected, as previous studies have described that L. santolla constitutes a significant part of the benthic invertebrate biomass [14]. L. santolla are commonly assumed to be generalist feeders, able to exploit a broad range of resources [4], predating preferentially on gastropod mollusks, crustaceans, bryozoans, and algae [15]. L. santolla occupies a key role in the trophic ecology in fjord waters because of its role as both predator and scavenger in coastal benthic ecosystems depending on the availability of food [14,16]. However, information about the feeding preferences of king crabs is still limited, and its trophic level has not been thoroughly assessed to date. Additionally, the complex life cycle of L. santolla [17] may cause changes in its diet according to the environment and prey availability, especially during ontogeny. Larvae recruit in shallow waters in complex substrates [18], and juveniles grow up associated with kelp forest [19], but then adults perform a seasonal bathymetric migration [19,20]. Vinuesa [21] and Vinuesa et al. [17] reported different diets for king crab juveniles from shallow rocky areas and adults inhabiting deeper shelf waters in the San Jorge Gulf, Argentina. Under laboratory conditions, L. santolla diet can also exhibit intra-specific predation, which occurs intensely during molting periods of early developmental stages when king crabs have soft exoskeletons and, consequently, are more exposed to cannibalism [9]. Cannibalism has been recorded in the wild as well [19].
In general, no studies have assessed how different strategies in feeding behavior, ontogenetic changes in habitats, sex, and partitioning of food resources relate to the trophic niche of L. santolla. However, it has been suggested that this species shares resources in the same habitat due to similar food requirements within a wide generalist diet [14]. Since sharing resources can lead to intra-specific competition [22], it is important to assess the extent of trophic niche overlap in resource utilization [23,24] to improve L. santolla fisheries management. In addition, studies of other crabs in other environments have demonstrated how ontogeny influences diet composition shifts because as the crab size increases, it allows them to capture larger prey [25,26] and improve predator-avoidance behavior [27].
The utilization of stable isotopes δ13C and δ15N in ecological studies has proven useful to trace trophic relationships [28], quantify the isotopic niche as a proxy for trophic niche [29,30], estimate niche overlap, and determinate niche region [31]. Some relevant research employing the isotopes technique has contributed to, for example, elucidating the dietary niche differences of the snow crab Chionoecetes opilio in complex environments [32] or to predicting the impacts of the invasive species red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus on the native biota of a subarctic fjord by determining its trophic role in the food web [26]. These and other studies demonstrate the possibilities offered by stable isotope analysis of δ13C and δ15N to investigate the population’s niche widths [24,29].
In the area where the present study was conducted, the high density and biomass of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae), which offer nursery areas, abundant food, and protection [33], as well as the presence of various economically important species, provide an ideal scenario to examine L. santolla’s trophic interactions. Indeed, the microhabitat proportioned by M. pyrifera for juveniles and/or adults of L. santolla may shape different foraging strategies linked to podding behavior, which is still not understood [8]. At present, there are no studies that establish the niche differentiation of L. santolla and the relationships among co-existing species.
The main objective of this study was to analyze the stomach content and isotopic composition of L. santolla to establish its diet, trophic niche width, position, and overlap, while also to determine the niche width of the community comprised together with the associated fauna within the benthic food web. This information may help understand the habitat and resource use of L. santolla as well as the energy pathways that determine the trophic structure of the system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The study was conducted in Nassau Bay (55°41′67″ S; 67°66′67″ W), located south of Navarino Island and north of Cape Horn Archipelago, Chile (Figure 1). The bay is about 100 km wide, with a shallow water environment less than 70 m depth. The water column presents a homogeneous vertical structure with a mean temperature of 6.5 °C, mean oxygen content of 6.5 mL L−1, and salinity of 32.5 [34]. The weather is characterized by a temperate-cold climate with a minimum temperature of 5 °C and a maximum of 10 °C [35].
The surrounding area hosts marine fauna that supports numerous fisheries, not only king crab (L. santolla) but also Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), southern blue whiting (Micromesistius australis), southern hake (Merluccius australis), golden conger eel (Genypterus blacodes), and false southern king crab (Paralomis granulosa), among other species [33,36]. This marine ecosystem is particularly abundant in large forests of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera and the southern bull kelp Durvillaea antarctica, which sustain a high diversity of invertebrates such as polychaetes, crustaceans, echinoderms, and sponges [37], and cold-water coral species can also be found [38].

2.2. Sampling

Samples were caught between September and November 2017 at 35 stations by personnel of the Instituto de Fomento Pesquero (IFOP) during artisanal small-scale fishing operations. King crabs and associated fauna were caught by randomly distributed crab traps positioned 24 to 35 m deep. Potential food sources such as macroalgae and surface bottom sediment samples were collected by SCUBA diving. On board, crabs were sexed according to their external morphology, following guidelines by Stevens and Jewett [39] and Lovrich and Vinuesa [40]. Individual wet weight (g), length (mm), and width (mm) of the carapace were recorded (see Supplementary Material Table S1 for further details). The maturity stage of king crabs was classified as follows: those with a cephalothorax length of >80 mm were considered adults, while those with a cephalothorax length of <80 mm were considered late juveniles [5,41,42] (Table 1). Stomachs were collected and kept in a 10% formaldehyde–seawater solution. For stable isotopes, muscular tissue of vertebrates and invertebrates, whole flora, and sediment samples were preserved in 1.5 mL cryovials in a liquid nitrogen tank and transported to the Laboratorio de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, for further processing.

2.3. Stomach Content Analysis (SCA)

Once in the laboratory, each stomach sample was dissected, and the Stomach Fullness Index SFIi was assigned, where the estimated overall fullness value ranged from 0 (empty) to 16 (stuffed) with intermediate values of 1 (traces of food), 2 (little food), 4 (some food), 8 (half-filled), and 12 (almost filled). Prior to the analysis, empty stomachs were excluded. The available contents were transferred to a petri dish for identification and recording of food items to the lowest taxonomic level under a binocular stereoscope at 20x magnification. When needed, items were placed on a slide and observed under a binocular microscope at 100x magnification. The unidentified material was grouped under a miscellaneous item group. Prey items were stored in 95% denatured ethanol. Quantitative estimates of diet composition were made by using an online computation spreadsheet [43], following the Point Method of Hynes [44], modified by Brun [45], Fratt and Dearborn [46], and Dearborn et al. [47], where the percentage mean volumetric contributions of food items were obtained for each individual.

2.4. Stable Isotope Analysis (SIA)

Eighty-eight king crabs, nine decapods, sixteen algae, four fish, twenty-one invertebrates, and four sediment samples were analyzed. Biota was sorted to the lowest possible taxonomic resolution following adequate literature [48,49,50]. Where taxonomic doubt existed, extra specimens were preserved in a formaldehyde–seawater solution for later verification by experts (see Acknowledgments section).
Samples were lyophilized for isotope analysis for 24 h at −60 °C or oven-dried at 60 °C for 48 h. After drying, samples were ground into a fine powder using an Agatha mortar and pestle. SIA, including the determination of carbon and nitrogen concentrations was carried out in the Laboratory of Biogeochemistry and Applied Stable Isotopes (LABASI) at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile using an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) Thermo Delta Advantage coupled to an Elemental Flash EA2000 analyzer. Some samples were acidified to remove CaCO3 in accordance with Fry [51] and Jacob et al. [52]. Stable isotope ratios were expressed in the delta notion δ13C and δ15N as the deviation from the conventional standard Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB) for carbon and air N2 for nitrogen in per mill (‰). After obtaining the isotope results, we did not perform lipid extraction of muscle tissue for the δ13C values of king crab since their mean muscle C:N was <3.2, which shows nonlipid-rich tissues for decapod crustaceans [53]. However, we applied the lipid correction factor for fish δ13C values in the associated fauna following Kiljunen et al. [54].

2.5. Data Analysis

Prior to statistical analysis, the arcsine transformation of percentage data (volumetric contribution of the L. santolla diet obtained by SCA) was performed. Then, normality and homogeneity of variance of all data were checked using the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. To compare king crab diets in both maturity stage and sexes, a factorial PERMANOVA was performed on the matrix of volumetric contribution per item for each southern king crab using the Bray–Curtis similarity matrix. In addition, a similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER) was conducted to determine which food item made the greatest contribution to dissimilarities in the diet between maturity stages and sexes. All analyses were performed in PRIMER v7 [55].
To account for differences among sex (males and females) and maturity stage (juveniles and adults), the values of δ13C and δ15N of the southern king crab were tested, through the PERMANOVA routine. When significant differences between groups were found, pairwise tests were performed (adult males, adult females, juvenile males, juvenile females as covariates).
In the absence of data normality, a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test was performed to compare the δ13C and δ15N values of basal sources. In all cases, a significance level of 0.05 was assumed which was used to test the significance of the null hypothesis. All statistical analyses were carried out in the PAST version 4.08 software [56].
Bayesian isotopic mixing models were performed by using the SIMMR package from R software, version 4.0.2 [57], first to create a biplot of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) values from individual southern king crabs grouped by sex and maturity stages and the potential food sources and second, to estimate the proportional contribution of macroalgae and sediment as basal carbon sources to the southern king crab population across sex and maturity stage. The SIMMR package uses the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate parameters from observed data and user-specified prior distributions [58]. This approach allows the user to incorporate uncertainty in trophic enrichment factors, sources, and mixtures [58]. The trophic enrichment factor (TEF) used for computing the mixing model was 2.3‰ (SE = 0.28) for δ15N and 0.4‰ (SE = 0.17) for δ13C for aquatic consumers [59].
The relative trophic positions (TPs) of L. santolla and associated fauna were estimated using the following equation according to Post [60]:
Trophic Positionconsumer= 1 + [(δ15Nconsumerδ15Nbaseline)/(TEF δ15N)],
where δ15Nconsumer is the δ15N value for an individual consumer, δ15Nbaseline represents the food-web baseline value of the macroalgae Macrocystis pyrifera in our study (trophic level 1) and TEF δ15N is the mean trophic enrichment factor of 2.3‰ for aquatic consumers [59].
To investigate ontogenetic shifts in the diet of L. santolla, linear regression models were fitted using log-transformed variables, such as carapace length (mm), as proxy of body size, body mass (g), and trophic position versus δ13C and δ15N.
To determine the size of isotopic niches of L. santolla, their variability across sex and maturity stage and overlap, carbon and nitrogen stable isotope data of adult males/females and late juvenile males/females were used to calculate the standard ellipse area (SEA) and corrected for small sample size (SEAc) with the Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses (SIBER) package in R [61]. The SEAc was set to contain 40% of isotopic observations of each group [62], along with the traditional standard convex hull which represents the isotopic total area (TA) occupied by individuals [30].
Additionally, to quantify differences in isotopic niche use among sex and maturity stages of L. santolla, the probability of a group appearing within the niche region (space) of another group was estimated by using the R package nicheROVER [32] with 95% credible intervals based on 10,000 iterations.
To explore preliminary community niche width, we ran the SIBER package in R [61] on the complete dataset which includes δ13C and δ15N values of all king crab and the relationship with associated fauna species with at least three samples. The degree of interspecific trophic overlap was calculated as the overlap index of the model SIBER, where a value greater than 1 indicates high overlap, and below 0.30 indicates low overlap [61].

3. Results

3.1. Stomach Content

In total, 149 stomach contents of L. santolla were dissected. Of these, 63.1% were found with traces of food, and 12.1% were empty. In lower percentages, 6.7% of the stomachs were found with little food, 5.4% with some food, 4.7% showed almost filled stomachs, 4.7% stuffed stomachs and, finally, only 3.4% showed half-filled stomachs. Of the total, only adults presented stuffed stomachs (7.7%) and the highest number of both traces of food (56%) and empty stomachs (13.2%). Meanwhile, no full stomachs were found in late juveniles, a high number of stomachs showed traces of food (74.1%) and the proportion of empty stomachs (10.3%) was lower (see Supplementary Material Table S1).
The diet composition of L. santolla comprised 16 major prey items. Of these, crustaceans and bivalves were found to be of higher importance (18.9% and 14%, respectively), followed by hydrozoans (13.2%), algae (12.3%), and fish (11.1%) and in less quantity, detritus (1.2%), cephalopods (0.8%), gastropods (0.7%), sediment (0.7%), and others (0.2%). Crustacean items included mostly body parts of the carapace/exoskeleton of king crabs, the algae items were fragments dominated by the brown algae Macrocystis pyrifera, and the fish items included body parts such as flesh, spines, scales, and otoliths of Merluccius australis. Among groups, in adult males, the highest contributors of prey items were crustaceans (31.9%), algae (23.8%), hydrozoans (11.3%), and fish (9%). In adult female crabs, it was hydrozoans (20.1%), fish (15.3%), bryozoans (14%), crustaceans (12.6%), and bivalves (12.6%). Late juvenile male crabs consumed greater amounts of crustaceans and bivalves (19.7% and 17.1%, respectively), followed by plastic (11.5%) and echinoderms (10.6%). In late juvenile females, the most important items were bivalves and porifera (24.3% and 14.9%, respectively), followed by hydrozoans (10.8%) and crustaceans (10.6%) (Table 2).
The standardized volumetric contribution (%) of prey to individual diet showed differences among maturity stage and sex (Supplementary Material Table S2). Indeed, the PERMANOVA showed differences between adults and juveniles (Pseudo-F = 3.62; p = 0.001) and between males and females (Pseudo-F = 2.19; p = 0.014) (Table 3). The SIMPER analysis showed an 83% dissimilarity in stomach contents between adults and juveniles, where crustaceans, hydrozoans, bivalves, and algae were the prey that contributed most to these differences (19.8%, 14.1%, 11.3%, and 11%, respectively) (Table 4). Among sex groups, the SIMPER analysis showed an 81.2% dissimilarity between males and females, where crustaceans, hydrozoans, algae, and bivalves were the prey that contributed most to the differences between them (14.5%, 13.6%, 12.4%, and 11%, respectively) (Table 5). We identified dominant fragments of brown algae Macrocystis pyrifera and, in very little proportion, unidentified calcareous red algae and some green filamentous algae.

3.2. King Crab Stable Isotope Composition and Potential Basal Carbon Sources

The results are shown in Table 6, including a full list of taxa, their classification, stable isotope values, and relevant trophic traits. Overall, δ13C values in L. santolla tissues ranged from −16.9‰ to −13.2‰ (mean −14.9), while δ15N values ranged from 10.5‰ to 12.6‰ (mean 11.6) within the population. In addition, the δ13C–δ15N biplot revealed segregation among maturity stages and sexes (Figure 2).
Among maturity stages, the mean δ13C value of the late juveniles (−15.3‰) was significantly lower than in adults (mean −14.7‰) (Pseudo-F = 12.39; p = 0.001). The mean δ15N value of adults (11.6‰) was significantly more enriched 15N than the late juveniles (mean 11.4‰) (Pseudo-F = 4.67; p = 0.0355). Among sexes, the mean δ13C value of the males (−15.1‰) was more 13C depleted than the females (mean −14.8‰) but there were not significant differences (Pseudo-F = 3.39; p = 0.0509). The mean δ15N value of males (11.7‰) was significantly higher compared to the females (mean 11.4‰) (Pseudo-F = 17.62; p = 0.0001).
Pairwise comparisons in δ13C values among maturity stages and sexes revealed significant mean differences between adult females and late juvenile males, and between adult females and late juvenile females (p < 0.05). In δ15N values, adult males were significantly different in relation to all the other groups (p < 0.05).
The Bayesian mixing models showed that the predominant basal carbon source that contributes to the diet of L. santolla population was the brown macroalgae Macrocystis pyrifera, with average values of 89.6% for males, 96.5% for females, 88.8% for adults, and 88.2% for late juveniles. The second carbon source contributing to L. santolla was the red algae Porphyra columbina, showing average values of 2.5% for males, 0.8% for females, 0.26% for adults, and 0.28% for late juveniles. The proportional contribution of sediment was 0.28% for males, 0.10% for females, 0.31% for adults, and 0.32% for late juveniles. The carbon primary sources such as macroalgae species Gigartina skottsbergii, Gracilaria chilensis, and Ulva lactuca contributed less than 0.20% to the nutrition of L. santolla (Figure 3).
Details of isotopic values for each basal source used in the model are shown in Table 2. There were significant differences in both δ13C and δ15N among basal sources (H = 18.23; p = 0.002 for δ13C and H = 11.62; p = 0.002 for δ15N). Among the sources, macroalgae Porphyra columbina and Gracilaria chilensis had the widest range in δ13C. The highest mean δ13C value was found for G. chilensis, and the highest mean δ15N value was found for P. columbina. A mean δ13C value of −15.59‰ and mean δ15N value of 6.26‰ were for Macrocystis pyrifera. Sediment had mean δ13C and δ15N values of −18.35‰ and 5.58‰, respectively.

3.3. Isotopic Niche and Overlap

The δ13C–δ15N biplot with the standard ellipse area revealed intra-population niche differences for Lithodes santolla (Figure 4). L. santolla shows broader isotopic niches but they were marginally larger in adult males (SEAc = 0.85‰2) than in adult females (SEAc = 0.61‰2). Late juvenile males and females occupied relatively smaller isotopic niche spaces (SEAc = 0.49‰2 and 0.44‰2, respectively) (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The SEAc of late juvenile females was significantly smaller compared to the SEAc of adult males (p < 0.05) (Figure 5).
The niche overlap estimated with SIBER showed a high degree of overlap between late juvenile males and females (34.8%), while less overlap (<3%) was found for the rest of groups. The observed δ13C of adult females were more enriched compared to late juvenile females, resulting in the lowest probability of niche overlap (0.8%) (Figure 4).
The nicheROVER analysis revealed that there is a high probability (95%) of southern king crab individuals to be found in the same niche region within the population, where the isotope niche of late juvenile females showed an extremely high probability to be found in the niche regions of adult males (98.2%), adult females (94%), and late juvenile males (91.4%). Similarly, the niche region of late juvenile males showed a high probability to be recorded in adult males and females niche regions (89.1% and 83.9%, respectively). Isotopic niches of adult females showed a high probability to be found in the niche region of adult males (89.2%). Finally, the isotope niche of adult males was low in the niche regions of late juvenile females and males (54.8 and 53.4%, respectively) (Figure 6).

3.4. Trophic Position and Ontogenetic Shift

Overall, the estimated mean trophic position for L. santolla was 3.3 (SD = 0.2; range 2.8–3.8). In relation to sex groups, in males the estimated mean trophic position was 3.4 (SD = 0.2; range 3.1–3.8) and for females 3.2 (SD = 0.1; range 2.8–3.6). Regarding maturity stage, in adults the estimated mean trophic position was 3.3 (SD = 0.2; range 2.8–3.8), and finally, for late juveniles it was 3.3 (SD = 0.2; range 3.0–3.8) (Table 6). The δ15N of southern king crab indicated that individuals fed at a common trophic level representing secondary consumers. There were significant differences in trophic position among sex (Pseudo-F = 17.63, p = 0.0002) and maturity stages (Pseudo-F = 4.68; p = 0.034). When comparing all groups, adult males showed significant differences from all the other groups (p < 0.05).

3.5. Relationship between Body Size, Body Mass, TP and Isotopic Values of Lithodes santolla

There were significant positive relationships between body size (i.e., carapace length) with trophic position and δ15N values of L. santolla (p < 0.05). In contrast, there was a significant negative relationship between body size and δ13C (p = 0.005). Trophic position and δ15N values increased significantly with individuals’ body mass in all groups (p < 0.05), but a negative relationship with δ13C was found (p = 0.004). The trophic position was not significantly related to δ13C (p = 0.405) (Figure 7).

3.6. Community Niche Width and Food Web Length

The isotopic niche width of associated fauna and southern king crab indicated that the largest niche area hosts spider crab (Eurypodius sp.) with 1.67‰2, followed by eelpout fish (Bassanago sp.) with 0.85‰2, southern king crab (L. santolla) with 0.84‰2, common fjord starfish (Cosmasterias lurida) with 0.75‰2, hermit crab (Propagurus gaudichaudi) with 0.62‰2, and southern octopus (Enteroctopus megalocyathus) with 0.54‰2, being the smallest area of isotopic niche for false southern king crab (P. granulosa) with 0.39‰2 and piquilhue snail (Adelomelon ancilla) with 0.33‰2 (Figure 8). We found little niche overlap in almost all of the species within the southern king crab’s niche, with the exception of the southern octopus and the piquilhue snail where no overlap was found. The southern king crab showed some overlap with eelpout fish (0.33), common fjord starfish (0.28), false southern king crab (0.14), and spider crab (0.09) (Figure 8).
With a TEF of 2.3‰, the estimated trophic position (TPs) for the associated fauna varied from 2.1 for the sponge Haliclona sp. positioned as a consumer of the first trophic level, to 4.2 for southern octopus as the highest predator in the benthic food web (Table 6). The community’s isotopic niches revealed at least four trophic levels where the southern king crab was found positioned as an intermediate level consumer (trophic level = ~3).

4. Discussion

4.1. Diet Composition of Lithodes santolla

The stomach content data analyzed in the present study characterized Nassau Bay southern king crabs as omnivorous feeders that consume a great diversity of prey including crustaceans, hydrozoans, other small benthic invertebrates (e.g., bivalves and bryozoans), algae, among other prey. These findings corroborate previous studies of populations located in different regions and lead us to conclude that L. santolla has a generalist feeding strategy and the ability to exploit a wide variety of natural resources from coastal benthic waters [2,3,4,14,15,19,62,63]. Therefore, L. santolla’s foraging strategy should significantly influence trophic dynamics, as strategies that incorporate a more varied prey favor more complex energetic pathways in the local benthic food web [64].
Interestingly, studies of the diet composition of L. santolla based on stomach content analyses are mostly restricted to juveniles or adults, but they can shift their diets. For example, Comoglio and Amin [15] indicated that juveniles, between 40–70 mm CL from the Beagle Channel, consume mainly gastropod mollusks, crustaceans, bryozoans, and algae, finding a total of 20 different items. In early juveniles, that is, specimens between 8.40–49.04 mm CL from the Gulf of San Jorge, Argentina, Vinuesa et al. [14] identified a total of 27 different food items, being red algae, ophiuroids, echinoderms, isopods, bivalve mollusks, polychaetes and bryozoans the most consumed prey. In adults between 70–119 mm CL also from the Gulf of San Jorge, Balzi [42] recorded four main prey including fish, squat lobsters, echinoderms, and bivalve mollusks.
Our study shows significant differences in the feeding patterns of late juveniles and adults, whereby late juveniles consume more bivalves than any other group. Therefore, juveniles forage differently from adults, which is probably due to the availability of prey in the habitat which individuals use. Since southern king crabs’ sexual maturity varies in relation to region or depth [5,40,65], care has been taken to assure the class sizes’ accuracy between late juveniles and adults reflected in the population under study.
Furthermore, southern king crabs are also known to have similar food preferences between males and females [14,15]. Conversely, our study detected differences in diet composition between sexes in both adults that were mostly related to prey item percentage. This result could indicate variations in prey availability in the foraging areas that could probably be attributable to differences in sexual behavior and ontogenetic patterns of habitat use [66,67]. Indeed, some evidence indicates that in the early spring season, females and males of L. santolla migrate to shallow waters for molting and mating and then return to deeper waters in late spring [40,68]. Hence, foraging prey availability for L. santolla of both sexes may match within their habitat during this reproductive migration.
L. santolla also appears to have an opportunistic scavenging strategy since the proportion of fish registered in diet composition among sexes and maturity stages presumably relies on the fish bait used in the crab traps (e.g., southern hake). Similar results were recorded in other fishing areas, where L. santolla scavenges discarded fish, such as Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi, from trawlers [42].
In general, Lithodes santolla feed throughout the year, except for a few weeks during the molting period, when feeding ceases or decreases in intensity [69]. This has been shown, for example, in L. santolla in the Beagle Channel, where a high percentage of empty stomachs were recorded during the spring period [15]. This may explain the results observed in our study, where although the number of entirely empty stomachs observed was minimal, a high percentage of stomachs were found only with traces of food.
On the other hand, the stomach content results provide evidence of intraspecific predation within the natural population of L. santolla. The presence of crab carapace fragments inside the southern king crabs’ stomachs allows us to infer the possibility of cannibalistic behavior between juveniles and adults with unknown implications for this species’ growth, fitness, and reproductive success. Indeed, Pardo et al. [19] reported cannibalism for this species in the wild, with 43% of exoskeleton crabs in the stomachs of early juveniles. In addition, Lovrich [17] observed that newly molted juveniles of L. santolla are eaten by adults. It has been observed in other juvenile crustaceans’ species that a higher risk of predation associated with complex habitats, creates a conspecific predation bottleneck [69,70]. Further evaluation of species’ habitats is needed to understand this particular characteristic, which may better describe the species’ population dynamics [71].
In the present study, fragments of deteriorating algae had a relatively low volumetric contribution in the stomach content of L. santolla and may represent a direct and/or indirect intake of other prey such as epibionts bryozoans, gastropods, etc. These results are different from those reported by Vinuesa et al. [14], who observed a higher occurrence of red coralline algae on late juveniles of L. santolla. Here, bivalves and crustaceans were of major importance in the stomach contents of late juveniles. This may suggest that the relative abundance of prey availability and their quality could account for omnivorous feeding at different trophic levels [72,73].
Additionally, we also recorded the presence of microplastics in the stomach content of L. santolla, corresponding mainly to fibers between 0.05–5 mm in length. Fibers occur as both small strands, varying between blue and red, and in the form of a ball, ranging from transparent to black. Similar findings were reported by Andrade and Ovando [74]. They point out that the probable origin of this waste and its transport to the sampling area is due to fishing activities, domestic use materials, and/or synthetic clothing. The possible routes of ingestion of the plastics can be by direct consumption or indirectly by trophic transfer from the lower trophic level in the food chain [75]. Similar results of plastic ingestion have been found in other decapod crustaceans of commercial importance, such as Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus, where plastic fibers’ effects within the stomach contents caused a lower feeding rate and lower reserves [76]. Recently, the presence of plastic fibers in the stomach contents of Paralithodes camtschaticus has also been recorded, reaching 37.9% of 139 crabs analyzed [26]. At the moment, the potential toxicity is unknown and the mechanical or other detrimental effects caused by the ingestion of plastics by L. santolla or in the rest of the organisms that make up the food web in the Nassau Bay area.
For the first time, Cephalopoda were recorded in the stomach content of L. santolla, since octopus beaks were found in it. In general, cephalopods are active predators of crustaceans, mollusks, polychaetes, fish, and other cephalopods and constitute an important carnivore in marine ecosystems [77,78]. In the Magellan sub-Antarctic region, the presence of dead octopuses on the seabed has been anecdotally documented by fishermen during diving activities (Eduardo Almonacid, 2019, personal communication.). Most probably, L. santolla scavenges on octopus remnants, and such carrion prey availability can be beneficial to the L. santolla.
When comparing the diet of L. santolla to that of other decapod crustaceans from the northern hemisphere, similar findings are reported. For example, the opportunistic generalist Alaska red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus fed on 69 food items, with bivalves and polychaetes being the most consumed items for both late juveniles and adults, followed by echinoderms and crustaceans. The analysis also showed that all the specimens contained algae in their stomachs, but lower than other items [26]. In addition, the omnivorous snow crab Chionoecetes opilio’s mainly preys on polychaetes, mollusks, echinoderms, and teleost fishes, although the latter two in smaller quantities for both late juveniles and adults (30–130 mm CW) [32].

4.2. Contribution of Kelp Carbon as the Major Source to Lithodes santolla

Our study significantly expands the knowledge on L. santolla trophic ecology studies since the stable isotope analysis provided a novel insight into resource use within a population across sex and maturity stage groups, trophic niche, overlap, trophic position, and interactions with crab trap-associated fauna. There is very little isotopic information on this species [19]. In general, the mean values of δ13C and δ15N of L. santolla are similar to those found in the Patagonian fjord ecosystem for this species [19,79], and they are within the range found for other species of omnivore crabs from high latitude ecosystems [26,32].
The carbon signal of L. santolla showed intermediate values in Nassau Bay, which reflected a nearshore ecosystem, where nearby kelp belts of Macrocystis pyrifera provide a predictable source of nutrition. Conversely, the mean values of δ13C found in the L. santolla population presented a variation between –16.83‰ and –13.22‰, which corresponds to a food chain producer-based primary with a C4 photosynthetic pathway (e.g., marine brown macroalgae [80]). The Bayesian mixing models confirmed that M. pyrifera was the most important basal carbon source for southern king crabs in Nassau Bay compared to the red algae Porphyra columbina and the sediment, whose contribution seems to be little.
The incorporation of kelp carbon into L. santolla body tissues may be from the direct and/or indirect consumption of M. pyrifera. Consequently, the transfer of energy and nutrients is mediated by abundant primary consumers such as herbivores and grazers relying on feeding on kelp [81,82,83]. Thus, the giant kelp M. pyrifera would be an important carbon donor throughout the benthic food web [84]. However, we cannot ignore that quantities of decomposed kelp material and macroalgal drift can be an important carbon source that enter the food chain through detrital pathways [85,86,87]. To disentangle these mechanisms of energy pathways, further isotopic information is required from other allochthonous and autochthonous carbon food sources and from other organisms inhabiting and consuming M. pyrifera in this high-latitude marine ecosystem. In addition, the spatio-temporal variability of basal sources should be considered, as their effects on the quantity/quality of available food for consumers are well known [88,89,90,91]. For instance, in sub-Antarctic marine systems, macroalgal carbon contributions sustain benthic food webs [92,93]. Large amounts of macroalgae-derived suspended particulate matter of kelp origin and resuspended kelp detritus represent significant nutrition sources for nearshore habitats [93,94]. The importance of kelp as an important trophic base for benthic food webs could also be due to the high polyunsaturated fatty-acid content [95] and probably, being of nutritional importance for the growth and reproduction of invertebrates, as many algae had been described to serve as high-quality food for invertebrates in other systems [96].

4.3. Intraspecific Niche Variation and Overlap of Lithodes santolla

The isotopic patterns observed show intraspecific trophic niche variation in the southern king crab. Niche size and region representations revealed a considerable dietary partitioning between sex and maturity, showing a greater tendency to forage different food items. It is perhaps forage intake that underpins differences in habitat use. The isotopic niches of individuals either overlapped or showed some levels of similar use and resource partitioning. The intraspecific niche variation observed in adult males/females indicated that their exploitation of trophic resources is more diversified than late juvenile males/females. These findings may be attributed to an ontogenetic shift linked to body size [97,98], age [99], seasonal migration [100], and sexual segregation [101], among others. However, spatial separation by migratory patterns in the life cycle of L. santolla [44,102,103] reinforces the idea that the high mobility of adults from both sexes, when migrating from shallow to deep waters, means they have more access to habitat foraging resources than the juveniles do. Therefore, the niche differentiation found in the southern king crab population allows the species to partition resources since they likely share the same ecological niche, which facilitates the coexistence of similar species [104]. The mechanism associated with this pattern in L. santolla has yet to be explored.
The narrower niche found in late juveniles from both sexes could indicate limited access to forage by the availability of food in the habitat and therefore can aid resource partitioning and a more specialized diet [105]. Consumer specialization shifts, for a particular resource or habitat use, are mostly related to ontogenetic changes in resource use in organisms [105,106]. For instance, evidence based on juvenile pods of L. santolla around kelp beds of Macrocystis pyrifera [8] supports the idea of juvenile specialization on kelp-associated prey (e.g., bivalves). Moreover, kelp forests and beds of M. pyrifera are common habitats, forming in shallow coastal ecosystems in the Magellan region [63,107], and smaller juveniles of L. santolla seem to occupy them as microhabitats to minimize the risk of predation or cannibalism [14].
Despite these findings, one also has to account for the influence when routing processes of isotopic data to estimate niche variation since outliers were included in our niche analysis to not underestimate the natural variability of organisms [67] as we do not have isotopic prey availability data.
On the other hand, the significant enrichment in δ15N found in adult males enables them to forage on food sources higher in δ15N than females and late juveniles in various habitats, including kelp beds, along a spatial gradient and also on prey sources, thus increasing their trophic position. Besides, adult females showed more enrichment of δ13C, suggesting they are using other food sources more related to coastal waters (e.g., littoral benthic environment). Larger niche sizes in adults may also indicate a shift from a foraging behavior to scavenging [16], perhaps across a wide range of benthic habitats (e.g., nearshore and offshore). Given these characteristics in the complex feeding ecology of L. santolla, it would be useful to understand how ontogenetic changes affect an organism’s resource use to optimize their energetic requirements and nutrition as they grow and when food resources are limited [96].
The overlapping of Bayesian ellipses provides a measure of the diversity of individual patterns in resource use [31] so that the results account for a broad use of trophic resources. There are similar resource requirements such as food and habitat, with varying degrees of overlap depending on the availability of the limited resources. It is possible that the overlapping of niches emphasizes the reported cannibalism for this species in their natural environment [19]. Indeed, cannibalism has been described as a common phenomenon among crustaceans [9,108,109].

4.4. Trophic Position of Lithodes santolla

According to our results, L. santolla has an intermediate trophic position belonging to a secondary consumer (relative trophic level = ~3), and its range reflects an intraspecific variation in diet (i.e., trophic level does not relate to δ13C), which supports an omnivore-based diet. Moreover, regression analyses indicated that as the L. santolla increased its body size and body mass, the isotopic niche moved along both axes, with a significant shift from late juveniles to adults, towards more enriched δ15N values reflected in a higher trophic position. Therefore, these results suggest that southern king crab tissues assimilate 13C- and 15N-enriched food sources as they grow and develop [110,111,112]. Consequently, trophic positions increase with ontogeny. However, our data should be interpreted cautiously, as it does not fully reflect all L. santolla life stages. Hence, an extended sampling that incorporates early juveniles should be carried out. Recently, a published paper by Pardo et al. [20], focused on juveniles of L. santolla, found an ontogenetic shift where the vagile phase occupied a higher trophic position than the cryptic phase. In general, ontogenetic niche shifts through life history are common in aquatic consumers [97,99,113], particularly many crustaceans display ontogenetic dietary shifts related to body size increases [114,115,116].
The estimated trophic position for the southern king crab in this study (3.3) is higher compared to that reported by Pardo et al. [19] for other populations within the region, although the species showed a similar diet. These findings can be attributed to the basal carbon signature assimilated by L. santolla and to the availability of high-quality food in the environment. Another comparison can be made with the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (3.1), a decapod from a different high latitude ecosystem [26], wherein both species represent a trophic role of a secondary consumer, also called the first-order predator, in the trophic structure.

4.5. Community Niche Width

Our study represents the first attempt to estimate the trophic niche overlap of L. santolla with associate fauna, as co-existing species, and their niche widths. Although there are many target fisheries in the area, the marine ecosystems and their trophic pathways’ functioning remains poorly understood. Stable isotope analyses indicated that L. santolla overlap their isotopic niche, more or less, with some species of the associated fauna, such as false southern king crab, eelpout fish, and starfish, evidencing the sharing of food resources and habitat use. For example, L. santolla may share resources and habitat with P. granulosa. They present similar foraging behaviors and preys found in both species’ diets (e.g., algae, mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms) [69]. The starfish, on the other hand, it may share gastropods and bivalves’ prey, but also microhabitat since it is actively feeding in kelp M. pyrifera [82]. For eelpout fish, there is no information about its diet and these results might suggest that this species is a potential predator of the southern king crab as seen by the niche overlap. Moreover, eelpout fish has a similar niche size with southern king crab and may suggest both species share food sources and habitats.
In contrast, there is no evidence in our study of niche overlap within the community between L. santolla and the southern octopus and piquilhue snail. This is probably related to different habitats and preys, besides both species occupy a higher trophic position than L. santolla. In addition, the narrow niche size found in piquilhue snail seems to be a more specialist diet. In fact, Bigatti et al. [117] reported two dominant bivalve species in piquilhue snail stomach contents. Further research that includes more species interactions is necessary for improving the knowledge of the benthic food web.
The results of this study are relevant for ecosystem-based management in Nassau Bay. Therefore, it would be important to conduct long-term trophic studies to clarify whether the competing species are using the same habitats [97] and what the overlap niche effects are of multiple target fisheries in the abundance of food source availability.

5. Conclusions

The information presented here could be considered for the establishment of the regular monitoring of isotopic composition in southern king crab populations, as measures of niche and trophic position reflect the state of the populations summarizing the changes in a species’ population dynamics [118]. Thus, our study could be considered a benchmark for future surveys of Lithodes santolla within and among populations since the increase or decrease in trophic position and variation of trophic niche width could indicate changes in the availability of prey and the reduction of the adult fraction or an increase in juveniles of the population of L. santolla.
The feeding ecology complexity in L. santolla with its multiple features (foraging strategies, variation in habitat use, ontogenetic diet shifts, intraspecific/interspecific niche, partitioning of resources, among others) impact the efficiency of energy use, the requirements of the animal, and the secondary production [119]. It seems that being a generalist with an omnivorous diet is an advantage over other species since they can adjust their feeding preferences according to their fitness requirements by preying on less nutritious but abundant food and less but more nutritious food sources in variable proportions [120]. To improve the knowledge of foods’ nutritional value, the fatty acid composition of L. santolla and their prey’s abundance should be further investigated.
Finally, this study reinforces the urgency of research in this area to improve conservation management of southern king crab populations. Further studies are needed to assess the implications of habitat fragmentation enhanced by climate change and harvesting activities on the kelp forests, Macrocystis pyrifera, that play an essential role as a critical habitat and nutritious carbon food source for L. santolla and many other species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d14010056/s1, Table S1: Information of sampling dates and locations, body measurements, sex, maturity state, type of analysis (stable isotope/stomach content) and stomach fullness index for all individuals of Lithodes santolla included in the study, from the Nassau Bay, Cape Horn; Table S2: Percentage average volumetric contribution to individual Lithodes santolla diet.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A., E.D. and E.A.; methodology, C.A.; data curation, C.A., C.R. and F.O.; software, C.A. and C.R.; formal analysis, C.A., C.R., F.O. and L.M.P.; validation, C.A.; resources, E.D., F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.; writing—review and editing, C.A., C.R., E.D., E.A., L.M.P. and F.M.; visualization, C.A., C.R. and L.M.P.; project administration, C.A.; funding acquisition; C.A., E.D. and E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, IFOP Project Programa de Seguimiento de las Principales Pesquerías Nacionales, Año 2017. Pesquerías de Crustáceos Bentónicos.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of Chilean law and organism were collected with fishing permits (Subsecretaría de Pesca y Acuacultura, Resolución Exenta No 3516).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alex Oyarzo for field assistance and collecting and handling samples (Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, IFOP); Ruth Hernández for fieldwork coordination (Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, IFOP); Pedro Oyarzún for providing logistical support during the fieldwork (the shipowner of motorboat L/M ´Romanche`); Américo Montiel (Universidad de Magallanes, Chile) for his collaboration in the identification of polychaetes; César Cárdenas (Instituto Antártico Chileno, INACH) for sponge identifications; Nicole Olguín (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile) for helping us to identify the molts in the crab stomachs; Paul Brickle (South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Stanley, Falklands Islands) for his help in identifying fish otoliths; and Mathias Hüne (Centro de Investigación para la Conservación de los Ecosistemas Australes, Chile) for his help in identifying fish samples. We would also like to thank Eduardo Quiroga (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile) for his constructive comments on the manuscript. We thank Margaret Bazley, Pamela Palacios-Fuentes, and Valentina Ruiz for improving the English editing. Finally, we thank FONDECYT 1190984.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest and funders had no influence with the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Pollack, G.; Berghöfer, A.; Berghöfer, U. Fishing for social realities—Challenges to sustainable fisheries management in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve. Mar. Policy 2008, 32, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stuardo, J.; Solis, I. Biometría y observaciones generales sobre la biología de Lithodes antarcticus Jacquinot. Gay. Zool. 1963, 11, 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  3. Campodónico, I.; Hernández, M.; Riveros, E. Investigación, manejo y control de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la XII región. Informe Consolidado: Recurso centollón. Punta Arenas, Chile. 1983. Available online: http://www.bibliotecadigital.umag.cl (accessed on 14 January 2019).
  4. Guzmán, L.; Ríos, C. Investigación, manejo y control de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la Xlla región 1979–1983 informe Consolidado: Recurso centolla (Lithodes antarcticus Jacquinot). Punta Arenas, Chile. 1985. Available online: http://www.bibliotecadigital.umag.cl (accessed on 26 January 2019).
  5. Vinuesa, J. Sistema reproductor, ciclo y madurez gonadal de la centolla (Lithodes antarcticus) del canal Beagle. Contrib. INIDEP 1984, 441, 73–95. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cañete, J.I.; Cárdenas, C.; Oyarzún, S.; Plana, J.; Palacios, M.; Santana, M. Pseudione tuberculata Richardson, 1904 (Isopoda: Bopyridae): A parasite of juveniles of the king crab Lithodes santolla (Molina, 1782) (Anomura: Lithodidae) in the Magellan Strait, Chile. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2008, 43, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lovrich, G.; Tapella, F. Southern king crabs. In King Crabs of the World: Biology and Fisheries Management; Stevens, B.G., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 405–449. ISBN 978-143-985-541-6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cárdenas, C.; Cañete, J.I.; Oyarzún, S.; Mansilla, A. Podding of juvenile king crabs Lithodes santolla (Molina, 1782) (Crustacea) in association with holdfasts of Macrocystis pyrifera (Linnaeus) C. Agardh, 1980. Investig. Mar. 2007, 35, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sotelano, P.; Lovrich, G.; Romero, C.; Tapella, F. Cannibalism during intermolt period in early stages of the Southern King Crab Lithodes santolla (Molina 1872): Effect of stage and predator–prey proportions. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2012, 411, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garay-Flühmann, R.; Garay-Narváez, L.; Montenegro, C.; Galán, A.; Olguín, A.; Andrade, C.; Pinilla, E.; Vidal, G.; Aedo, G.; Contreras, H.; et al. Modelamiento ecológico conceptual y cualitativo para recursos centolla (Lithodes santolla) y centollón (Paralomis granulosa) Región de Magallanes y la Antártica Chilena y de jaiba marmola (Metacarcinus edwardsii), Chiloé, Región de Los Lagos. IFOP: Valparaíso, Chile, 2019. Available online: http://www.ifop.cl/enfoque-ecosistemico/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2019/07/INFORME_T%C3%89CNICO_10_-_MOD.CUALIT._DIMENSI%C3%93N_ECOL%C3%93GICA_MAGALLANES_-_CHILO%C3%89.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2020).
  11. Botsford, L.; Castilla, J.C.; Peterson, C. The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Science 1997, 277, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hubans, B.; Chouvelon, T.; Begout, M.L.; Biais, G.; Bustamante, P.; Ducci, L.; Mornet, F.; Boiron, A.; Coupeau, Y.; Splitz, J. Trophic ecology of commercial-size meagre, Argyrosomus regius, in the Bay of Biscay (NE Atlantic). Aquat. Living Resour. 2017, 30, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. SERNAPESCA Home Page. Available online: http://www.sernapesca.cl/informes/estadisticas (accessed on 30 November 2020).
  14. Vinuesa, J.; Varisco, M.; Balzi, P. Feeding strategy of early juvenile stages of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla in the San Jorge Gulf, Argentina. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2013, 48, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Comoglio, L.; Amin, O. Dieta natural de la centolla patagónica Lithodes santolla (Lithodidae) en el Canal Beagle, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Biol. Pesq. 1996, 25, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  16. Balzi, P. Los hábitos alimenticios de la centolla Lithodes santolla (Molina) del Golfo San Jorge. Nat. Patagónica Cienc. Biol. 1997, 5, 67–87. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lovrich, G. Lithodidae. In Los Invertebrados del mar Argentino; Calcagno, J.A., Ed.; Vázquez Mazzini Editores: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2014; pp. 243–263. ISBN 978-987-3781-02-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tapella, F.; Lovrich, G.A. Asentamiento de estadios tempranos de las centollas Lithodes santolla y Paralomis granulosa (Decapoda: Lithodidae) en colectores artificiales pasivos en el Canal Beagle. Argentina. Investig. Mar. 2006, 34, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pardo, L.M.; Andrade, C.; Zenteno-Devaud, L.; Garrido, B.; Rivera, C. Trophic Ecology of Juvenile Southern King Crab Associated with Kelp Forest: Evidence of Cannibalism. Diversity 2021, 13, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Figueroa-Muñoz, G.; Retamal, M.; De Los Ríos, P.R.; Esse, C.; Pérez-Schultheiss, J.; Vega-Aguayo, R.; Boyero, L.; Correa-Araneda, F. Scavenging crustacean fauna in the Chilean Patagonian Sea. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vinuesa, J. Distribución de crustáceos decápodos y estomatópodos del golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2005, 40, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Svanbäck, R.; Bolnick, D. Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialization: An optimal diet theory method. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7, 993–1012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chase, J.; Leibold, M. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2003; p. 221. ISBN 0-226-10180-0. [Google Scholar]
  24. Newsome, S.D.; Martinez del Rio, C.; Bearhop, S.; Phillips, D.L. A niche for isotopic ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Squires, H.; Dawe, E. Stomach contents of snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio, Decapoda, Brachyura) from the Northeast Newfoundland Shelf. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 2003, 32, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fuhrmann, M.; Pedersen, T.; Nilssen, E. Trophic niche of the invasive red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus in a benthic food web. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2017, 565, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Falk-Petersen, J.; Renaud, P.; Anisimova, N. Establishment and ecosystem effects of the alien invasive red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) in the Barents Sea—A review. J. Mar. Sci. 2011, 68, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Michener, R.; Schell, D. Stable isotope ratios as tracers in marine aquatic food webs. In Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science; Michener, R., Lajtha, K., Eds.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1994; pp. 138–157. ISBN 978-140-512-680-9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bearhop, S.; Adams, C.E.; Waldron, S.; Fuller, R.A.; MacLeod, H. Determining trophic niche width: A novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004, 73, 1007–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Layman, C.A.; Arrington, D.A.; Montaña, C.G.; Post, D.M. Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure? Ecology 2007, 88, 4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Swanson, H.; Lysy, M.; Power, M.; Stasko, A.; Johnson, J.; Reist, J. A new probabilistic method for quantifying n-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap. Ecology 2015, 96, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Divine, L.; Bluhm, B.; Mueter, F.; Iken, K. Diet analysis of Alaska Arctic snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) using stomach contents and δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N stable isotopes. Deep-Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2017, 135, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Friedlander, A.; Ballesteros, E.; Bell, T.; Giddens, J.; Henning, B.; Hüne, M.; Muñoz, A.; Salinas de León, P.; Sala, E. Marine biodiversity at the end of the world: Cape Horn and Diego Ramírez islands. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0189930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Valdenegro, A.; Silva, N. Caracterización oceanográfica física y química de la zona de canales y fiordos australes de Chile entre el estrecho de Magallanes y cabo de Hornos (Cimar 3 Fiordos). Cienc. Tecnol. Mar. 2003, 26, 19–60. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cokendolpher, J.; Lanfranco, D. Opiliones from the Cape Horn Archipelago: New southern records for harvestment. J. Arachnol. 1985, 13, 311–319. [Google Scholar]
  36. Henríquez, V.; Licandeo, R.; Cubillos, L.; Cox, S. Interactions between ageing error and selectivity in statistical catch-at-age models: Simulations and implications for assessment of the Chilean Patagonian toothfish fishery. J. Mar. Sci. 2016, 73, 1074–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rozzi, R.F.; Massardo, A.; Mansilla, F.; Squeo, E.; Barros, E.; Poulin, M.; Rosenfeld, S.; Goffinet, C.; González-Weaver, R.; Mackenzie, R.D.; et al. Parque Marino Cabo de Hornos–Diego Ramírez. Informe Técnico para la Propuesta de Creación. Punta Arenas, Chile. 2017. Available online: https://issuu.com/umag9/docs/libro_informe_cabo_de_hornos_diego_ (accessed on 2 July 2018).
  38. Reyes, P. Presencia de corales de aguas frías (Cnidaria: Anthozoa & Hydrozoa) en aguas profundas (306–2.250 m) de la región de Magallanes, Chile. An. Inst. Patagon. 2019, 47, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Stevens, B.; Jewett, S. Growth, molting, and feeding of king crabs. In King Crabs of the World: Biology and Fisheries Management; Stevens, B., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 315–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lovrich, G.; Vinuesa, J. Biología de las centollas (Anomura: Lithodidae) In Los Crustáceos de Interés Pesquero y Otras Especies Relevantes en los Ecosistemas Marinos; Boschi, E.E., Ed.; INIDEP: Mar del Plata, Argentina, 2016; Volume 6, pp. 183–212. ISBN 978-987-1443-11-6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yañez, A. Estatus y Posibilidades de Explotación Biológicamente Sustentables de los Principales Recursos Pesqueros Nacionales, Jaiba y Centolla. Documento Consolidado. Convenio de Desempeño, 2016; IFOP: Valparaíso, Chile, 2017; Available online: https://www.ifop.cl/wp-content/contenidos/uploads/RepositorioIfop/InformeFinal/P-483253_jaiba_centolla.pdf (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  42. Balzi, P. Ecología y Biología de la Reproducción de la Centolla Lithodes santolla del Golfo de San Jorge. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Comodoro Rivadavia, CHT, 2005. Available online: https://aquadocs.org/handle/1834/14435 (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  43. Brey, T. Virtual Handbook. Available online: http://www.thomas-brey.de/science/virtualhandbook/spreadsheets/index.html (accessed on 12 December 2018).
  44. Hynes, H. The Food of Fresh-Water Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a Review of Methods Used in Studies of the Food of Fishes. J. Anim. Ecol. 1950, 19, 36–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brun, E. Food and Feeding Habits of Luidia ciliaris Echinodermata: Asteroidea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 1972, 52, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fratt, D.; Dearborn, J. Feeding biology of the Antarctic brittle star Ophionotus victoriae (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Polar Biol. 1984, 3, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dearborn, J.; Ferrari, F.; Edwards, K. Can pelagic aggregations cause benthic satiation? Feeding biology of the antarctic brittle star Astrotoma agassizii (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). In Biology of the Antarctic Seas XVII; Kornicker, L., Ed.; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 1986; Volume 44, pp. 1–28. ISBN 978-1-118-66670-8. [Google Scholar]
  48. Häussermann, V.; Försterra, G. Marine Benthic Fauna of Chilean Patagonia: Illustrated Identification Guide; Nature in Focus: Puerto Montt, Chile, 2009; p. 1000. ISBN 9789563322446. [Google Scholar]
  49. Galea, H.R. Hydroids and hydromedusae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from the fjords region of southern Chile. Zootaxa 2007, 1597, 1–116. [Google Scholar]
  50. Forcelli, D.O. Moluscos Magallánicos: Guía de Moluscos de Patagonia y sur de Chile; Vásquez Mazzini Editores: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2000; p. 200. ISBN 9879132017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fry, B. Food web structure on Georges Bank from stable C, N, and S isotopic compositions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1988, 33, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jacob, U.; Mintenbeck, K.; Brey, T.; Knust, R.; Beyer, K. Stable isotope food web studies: A case for standardized sample treatment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2005, 287, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bodin, N.; Le Loc’h, F.; Hily, C. Effect of lipid removal on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in crustacean tissues. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2007, 341, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kiljunen, M.; Grey, J.; Sinisalo, T.; Harrod, C.; Immonen, H.; Jones, R. A revised model for lipid-normalizing δ¹³C values from aquatic organisms, with implications for isotope mixing models. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 46, 1213–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Clarke, K.R.; Gorley, R.N. PRIMER v7: User Manual/Tutorial Plymouth.: PRIMER-E 2015. Available online: http://updates.primer-e.com/primer7/manuals/Getting_started_with_PRIMER_7.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2021).
  56. Hammer, O.; Harper, D.; Ryan, P. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  57. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria. 2020. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 10 March 2020).
  58. Parnell, A.; Inger, R.; Bearhop, S.; Jackson, A. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: Coping with too much variation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. McCutchan, J.H.; Lewis, W.M.; Kendall, C.; McGrath, C.C. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos 2003, 102, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Post, D.M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 2002, 83, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jackson, A.L.; Inger, R.; Parnell, A.C.; Bearhop, S. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER–Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Comoglio, L.I.; Vinuesa, J.H.; Lovrich, G.A. Feeding habits of southern king crab, Lithodes santolla (Molina), and the false king crab, Paralomis granulosa Jacquinot, in the Beagle Channel. In Proceedings of the International King & Tanner Crabs Symposium, Anchorage, AK, USA, 28–30 November 1989; pp. 315–325. [Google Scholar]
  63. Adami, M.L.; Gordillo, S. Structure and dynamics of the biota associated with Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyta) from the Beagle Channel, Tierra del Fuego. Sci. Mar. 1999, 63, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Lesser, J.S.; James, W.R.; Stallings, C.D.; Wilson, R.M.; Nelson, J.A. Trophic niche size and overlap decreases with increasing ecosystem productivity. Oikos 2020, 129, 1303–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vinuesa, J.H. Efectos e incidencia del parasitismo en la centolla (Lithodes santolla) y el centollón (Paralomis granulosa) del Canal de Beagle. Physis Seccion A 1989, 47, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hines, A.H.; Lipcius, R.N.; Haddon, A.M. Population dynamics and habitat partitioning by size, sex, and molt stage of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus in a subestuary of central Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1987, 36, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Araújo, M.S.L.C.; Barreto, A.V.; Negromonte, A.O.; Schwamborn, R. Population ecology of the blue crab Callinectes danae (Crustacea: Portunidae) in a Brazilian tropical estuary. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2012, 84, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Vinuesa, J.H.; Balzi, P. Reproductive biology of Lithodes santolla in the San Jorge Gulf, Argentina. In Crabs in Cold Water Regions: Biology, Management, and Economics; Paul, A.J., Dawe, E.G., Elner, R., Jamieson, G.S., Kruse, G.H., Otto, R.S., Sainte-Marie, B., Shirley, T.C., Woodby, D., Eds.; University of Alaska Sea Grant: Fairbanks, AK, USA, 2002; pp. 283–304. ISBN 978-1-56612-077-7. [Google Scholar]
  69. Comoglio, L.; Amin, O. Feeding habits of the false southern king crab Paralomis granulosa (Lithodidae) in the Beagle Channel, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Sci. Mar. 1999, 63, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Smith, K.N.; Herrkind, W.F. Predation on early juvenile spiny lobsters Panulirus argus (Latreille): Influence of size and shelter. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1992, 157, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Halpern, B.S. Habitat bottlenecks in stage-structured species: Hermit crabs as a model system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 276, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Diehl, S. The evolution and maintenance of omnivory: Dynamic constraints and the role of food quality. Ecology 2003, 84, 2557–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Olsson, K.; Nyström, P.; Stenroth, P.; Nilsson, E.; Svensson, M.; Granéli, W. The influence of food quality and availability on trophic position, carbon signature, and growth rate of an omnivorous crayfish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2008, 65, 2293–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Andrade, C.; Ovando, F. First record of microplastics in stomach content of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla (Anomura: Lithodidae), Nassau bay, Cape Horn, Chile. An. Inst. Patagon. 2017, 45, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Anderson, J.; Park, B.; Palace, V. Microplastics in aquatic environments: Implications for Canadian ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Murray, F. and Cowie, P. Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus (Linnaeus, 1758). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1207–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ibañez, C.; Chong, J. Feeding ecology of Enteroctopus megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in southern Chile. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 2008, 88, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Golikov, A.V.; Ceia, F.R.; Sabirov, R.M.; Batalin, G.A.; Blicher, M.E.; Gareev, B.I.; Gudmundsson, G.; Jørgensen, L.L.; Mingazov, G.Z.; Zakharov, D.V.; et al. Diet and life history reduce interspecific and intraspecific competition among three sympatric Arctic cephalopods. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cari, I.; Andrade, C.; Quiroga, E.; Mutschke, E. Benthic trophic structure of a Patagonian fjord (47°S): The role of hydrographic conditions in the food supply in a glaciofluvial system. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2020, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kremmer, B.P. C4-Metabolism in marine brown macrophytic algae. Z. Naturforsch. 1981, 36, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Castilla, J.C.; Moreno, C.A. Sea urchins and Macrocystis pyrifera: Experimental test of their ecological relations in southern Chile. In Proceedings of the International Conference, Tampa Bay, FL, USA, 14–17 September 1981; pp. 257–263. [Google Scholar]
  82. Castilla, J.C. Food webs and functional aspects of the kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, community in the Beagle Channel, Chile. In Antarctic Nutrient Cycles and Food Webs; Siegfried, W.R., Condy, P.R., Laws, R.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1985; pp. 407–414. ISBN 978-3-642-82275-9. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ojeda, F.P.; Santelices, B. Invertebrate communities in holdfasts of the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera from southern Chile. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1984, 16, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pessarrodona, A.; Moore, P.J.; Sayer, M.D.; Smale, D.A. Carbon assimilation and transfer through kelp forests in the NE Atlantic is diminished under a warmer ocean climate. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 4386–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Dunton, K.H.; Schell, D.M. Dependence of consumers on macroalgal (Laminaria solidungula) carbon in an arctic kelp community: δ¹³C evidence. Mar. Biol. 1987, 93, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mann, K.H. Production and use of detritus in various freshwater, estuarine, and coastal marine ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1988, 33, 910–930. [Google Scholar]
  87. Harrold, C.; Light, K.; Lisin, S. Organic enrichment of submarine-canyon and continental-shelf benthic communities by macroalgal drift imported from nearshore kelp forests. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 43, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Polis, G.A.; Strong, D.R. Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am. Nat. 1996, 147, 813–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sterner, R.W. Modelling interactions of food quality and quantity in homeostatic consumers. Freshw. Biol. 1997, 38, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mitra, A.; Flyn, K.J. Importance of interactions between food quality, quantity, and gut transit time on consumer feeding, growth, and trophic dynamics. Am. Nat. 2007, 196, 632–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Richoux, N.B.; Bergamino, L.; Moyo, S.; Dalu, T. Spatial and temporal variability in the nutritional quality of basal resources along a temperate river/estuary continuum. Org. Geochem. 2018, 116, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Andrade, C.; Ríos, C.; Gerdes, D.; Brey, T. Trophic structure of shallow-water benthic communities in the sub-Antarctic Strait of Magellan. Polar Biol. 2016, 39, 2281–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Riccialdelli, L.; Newsome, S.D.; Fogel, M.L.; Fernández, D.A. Trophic interactions and food web structure of a subantarctic marine food web in the Beagle Channel: Bahía Lapataia, Argentina. Polar Biol. 2016, 40, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kaehler, S.; Pakhomov, E.A.; Kalin, R.M.; Davis, S. Trophic importance of kelp-derived suspended particulate matter in a through-flow sub-Antarctic system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 316, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. dos Santos, M.A.Z.; de Freitas, S.C.; Berneira, L.M.; Mansilla, A.; Astorga-España, M.S.; Colepicolo, P.; Pereira, C.M. Pigment concentration, photosynthetic performance, and fatty acid profile of sub-Antarctic brown macroalgae in different phases of development from the Magellan Region, Chile. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 2629–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Guo, F.; Kainz, M.J.; Sheldon, F.; Bunn, S.E. The importance of high-quality algal food sources in stream food webs—Current status and future perspectives. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61, 815–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Werner, E.E.; Gilliam, J.F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15, 393–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Woodward, G.; Hildrew, A.G. Body-size determinants of niche overlap and intraguild predation within a complex food web. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71, 1063–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Polis, G.A. Age Structure Component of Niche Width and Intraspecific Resource Partitioning: Can Age Groups Function as Ecological Species? Am. Nat. 1984, 123, 541–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fokkema, W.; van der Jeugd, H.P.; Lameris, T.K.; Dokter, A.M.; Ebbinge, B.S.; Ross, A.M.; Nolet, A.N.; Piersma, T. Ontogenetic niche shifts as a driver of seasonal migration. Oecologia 2020, 193, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bearhop, S.; Phillips, R.A.; McGill, R.; Cherel, Y.; Dawson, D.A.; Croxall, J.P. Stable isotopes indicate sex-specific and long-term individual foraging specialisation in diving seabirds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 311, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Lovrich, G.A. La pesquería mixta de las centollas Lithodes santolla y Paralomis granulosa (Anomura: Lithodidae) en Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Investig. Mar. 1997, 25, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Lovrich, G.L.; Vinuesa, J.H.; Smith, B.D. Growth, maturity, and mating of male southern king crab (Lithodes santolla) in the Beagle Channel, Argentina. In Crabs in Cold Water Regions: Biology, Management, and Economics; Paul, A.J., Dawe, E.G., Elner, R., Jamieson, G.S., Kruse, G.H., Otto, R.S., Sainte-Marie, B., Shirley, T.C., Woodby, D., Eds.; University of Alaska Sea Grant: Fairbanks, AK, USA, 2002; pp. 147–168. ISBN 978-1-56612-077-7. [Google Scholar]
  104. Pianka, E.R. Competition and niche theory, In Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; May, R.M., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK, 1981; pp. 167–196. [Google Scholar]
  105. Bolnick, D.I.; Svanbäck, R.; Fordyce, J.A.; Yang, L.H.; Davis, J.M.; Hulsey, C.D.; Forister, M.L.; McPeek, M.A. The ecology of individuals: Incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 2003, 161, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chaguaceda, F.; Eklöv, P.; Scharnweber, K. Regulation of fatty acid composition related to ontogenetic changes and niche differentiation of a common aquatic consumer. Oecologia 2020, 193, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ríos, C. Marine Benthic Communities of the Magellan Region, Southern Chile: Contributions of Different Habitats to the Overall Biodiversity. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany, 2007. Available online: https://media.suub.uni-bremen.de/handle/elib/2516 (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  108. Lovrich, G.; Sainte-Marie, B. Cannibalism in the snow crab, Chionoecetes opilio (O. Fabricius) (Brachyura: Majidae), and its potential importance to recruitment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1997, 211, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Marshall, S.; Warburton, K.; Peterson, B.; Mann, D. Cannibalism in juvenile blue-swimmer crabs Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1766): Effects of body size, moult stage and refuge availability. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 90, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fry, B.; Arnold, C. Rapid ¹³C/¹²C turnover during growth of brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus). Oecologia 1982, 54, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fry, B. Stable Isotope Ecology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; p. 308. ISBN 978-0-387-33745-6. [Google Scholar]
  112. Vander Zanden, M.J.; Clayton, M.K.; Moody, E.K.; Solomon, C.T.; Weidel, B.C. Stable isotope turnover and half-life in animal tissues: A literature synthesis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Hentschel, B.T. Intraspecific variations in δ¹³C indicate ontogenetic diet changes in deposit-feeding polychaetes. Ecology 1998, 79, 1357–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lim, S.S.; Yong, A.Y.; Christy, J.H. Ontogenetic changes in diet and related morphological adaptations in Ocypode gaudichaudii. Invertebr. Biol. 2016, 135, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mancinelli, G.; Glamuzina, B.; Petric, M.; Carrozzo, L.; Glamuzina, L.; Zotti, M.; Raho, D.; Vizzini, S. The trophic position of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus Rathbun 1896 in the food web of Parila Lagoon (South Eastern Adriatic, Croatia): A first assessment using stable isotopes. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2016, 17, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Zeng, Q.; Jeppesen, E.; Gu, X.; Mao, Z.; Chen, H. Cannibalism and habitat selection of cultured Chinese Mitten Crab: Effects of submerged aquatic vegetation with different nutritional and refuge values. Water 2018, 10, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Bigatti, G.; Sanchez, C.; Miloslavich, P.; Penchaszadeh, P.E. Feeding behavior of Adelomelon ancilla (Ligfoot, 1786): A predatory neogastropod (Gastropoda: Volutidae) in Patagonian benthic communities. Nautilus 2009, 123, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  118. Vögler, R.; Milessi, A.; Quiñones, R. Influence of environmental variables on the distribution of Squatina guggenheim (Chondrichthyes, Squatinidae) in the Argentine–Uruguayan Common Fishing Zone. Fish. Res. 2008, 91, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Benke, A.C.; Wallace, J.B.; Harrison, J.W.; Koebel, J.W. Food web quantification using secondary production analysis: Predaceous invertebrates of the snag habitat in a subtropical river. Freshw. Biol. 2001, 46, 329–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Coll, M.; Guershon, M. Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: Mixing plant and prey diets. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 267–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Map showing the sampling locations where southern king crab Lithodes santolla, their primary food sources, and associated fauna organisms were collected in Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Figure 1. Map showing the sampling locations where southern king crab Lithodes santolla, their primary food sources, and associated fauna organisms were collected in Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Diversity 14 00056 g001
Figure 2. Isotope plot of mean δ13C and δ15N values (mean ± SD) for basal organic sources and southern king crab Lithodes santolla among sex and maturity stages, Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Figure 2. Isotope plot of mean δ13C and δ15N values (mean ± SD) for basal organic sources and southern king crab Lithodes santolla among sex and maturity stages, Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Diversity 14 00056 g002
Figure 3. Results of SIMMR Bayesian mixing models showing proportional estimates of potential carbon sources (mean, 25% and 75% percentiles) to the diet composition of southern king crab Lithodes santolla by groups: (a) adult males, (b) adult females, (c) juvenile males, and (d) juvenile females.
Figure 3. Results of SIMMR Bayesian mixing models showing proportional estimates of potential carbon sources (mean, 25% and 75% percentiles) to the diet composition of southern king crab Lithodes santolla by groups: (a) adult males, (b) adult females, (c) juvenile males, and (d) juvenile females.
Diversity 14 00056 g003
Figure 4. Isotopic niche widths of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla among sex and maturity stages in delta space. The standard ellipse areas (SEAs) are indicated by the solid lines, and convex hulls of the total area (TA) are indicated by the dashed lines estimated by SIBER analysis.
Figure 4. Isotopic niche widths of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla among sex and maturity stages in delta space. The standard ellipse areas (SEAs) are indicated by the solid lines, and convex hulls of the total area (TA) are indicated by the dashed lines estimated by SIBER analysis.
Diversity 14 00056 g004
Figure 5. Bayesian density plots showing the credibility intervals (50%, 75%, and 95%) of the standard ellipse areas for the southern king crab Lithodes santolla groups estimated by SIBER analysis. Black points = mean standard ellipse area, red points = mean standard ellipse areas corrected for small sample size (SEAc).
Figure 5. Bayesian density plots showing the credibility intervals (50%, 75%, and 95%) of the standard ellipse areas for the southern king crab Lithodes santolla groups estimated by SIBER analysis. Black points = mean standard ellipse area, red points = mean standard ellipse areas corrected for small sample size (SEAc).
Diversity 14 00056 g005
Figure 6. Bayesian plot of the posterior probability distribution of niche region metric (%) for the southern king crab Lithodes santolla groups estimated by nicheROVER analysis. The posterior means and 95% credible intervals are displayed in turquoise color.
Figure 6. Bayesian plot of the posterior probability distribution of niche region metric (%) for the southern king crab Lithodes santolla groups estimated by nicheROVER analysis. The posterior means and 95% credible intervals are displayed in turquoise color.
Diversity 14 00056 g006
Figure 7. Relationships between: (a) body size vs. TP, (b) body size vs. δ15N, (c) body mass vs. δ13C, (d) body mass vs. TP, (e) body mass vs. δ15N, (f) body mass vs. δ13C, and (g) δ13C vs. TP for all individuals of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla, Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Figure 7. Relationships between: (a) body size vs. TP, (b) body size vs. δ15N, (c) body mass vs. δ13C, (d) body mass vs. TP, (e) body mass vs. δ15N, (f) body mass vs. δ13C, and (g) δ13C vs. TP for all individuals of the southern king crab Lithodes santolla, Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Diversity 14 00056 g007
Figure 8. Community niche width output for the associated fauna species and the southern king crab Lithodes santolla using SIBER analysis. The standard ellipse area (SEA) represents the isotopic niche width of each species. SEA = solid lines and convex hulls of the total area (TA) = dashed lines.
Figure 8. Community niche width output for the associated fauna species and the southern king crab Lithodes santolla using SIBER analysis. The standard ellipse area (SEA) represents the isotopic niche width of each species. SEA = solid lines and convex hulls of the total area (TA) = dashed lines.
Diversity 14 00056 g008
Table 1. Size and weight ranges of Lithodes santolla by maturity stage and sex. Sample size and sampling method of southern king crab collected in Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Table 1. Size and weight ranges of Lithodes santolla by maturity stage and sex. Sample size and sampling method of southern king crab collected in Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
NLength (CL mm)Width (mm)Weight (gr)Sampling Method
Lithodes santolla Adult Males4688–16390–175600–3200Crab traps
Lithodes santolla Adult Females4590–14094–145500–2000Crab traps
Lithodes santolla Juvenile Males3054–7954–8495–354Crab traps
Lithodes santolla Juvenile Females2856–8058–85100–355Crab traps
Lithodes santolla All14954–16354–17595–3200Crab traps
Table 2. Mean volumetric contribution (%) of food items in the diet of Lithodes santolla among sex and maturity stage, Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Table 2. Mean volumetric contribution (%) of food items in the diet of Lithodes santolla among sex and maturity stage, Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Prey GroupsAdultSDAdultSDJuvenileSDJuvenileSDAllSD
MalesFemalesMalesFemales
Algae23.837.01913.47.714.46.312.212.323.4
Hydrozoa11.327.320.125.66.712.610.815.813.222.8
Bryozoa517.21427.51.243.19.16.819.2
Porifera----3.414.814.9323.616.5
Foraminifera0.51.82.5 2.64.769.12.75.3
Polychaeta1.95.12.55.84.814.10.73.72.47.8
Echinodermata3.116.73.810.210.623.21.44.14.515.1
Crustacea31.940.212.622.419.723.210.61818.928.9
Bivalvia5.920.112.620.917.117.624.3331423.7
Gastropoda0.52.30.41.60.73.71.24.30.72.9
Cephalopoda311------0.85.9
Fish10.923.615.327.06.520.89.119.911.124
Plastic2.136.516.811.5239.615.56.916
Sediment--003.612.6000.75.7
Detritus--0.113.819.61.96.11.29.1
Other--0.63----0.21.7
Number of
stomachs with food36 43 26 26 131
Table 3. Factorial PERMANOVA to test differences between maturity stage and sexes in diet contribution from 16 prey items.
Table 3. Factorial PERMANOVA to test differences between maturity stage and sexes in diet contribution from 16 prey items.
Source of VariationdfSums of SquarePseudo-FF (Perm)Perm
Maturity (M)1124583.62160.001999
Sex (S)17526.52.18790.014999
M × S15184.51.50710.111999
Res1273440.1
Total130
Bold figures indicate significant results (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Contribution of principal food items (%) to dissimilarity in stomach contents between adults and juveniles of Lithodes santolla from Cabo de Hornos. Av.Abund = average abundance of prey item, Av.Diss = average dissimilarity, Diss/SD = average contribution divided by the standard deviation, Contrib% = Contribution to the dissimilarities, Cum% = Cumulative contribution to the dissimilarities. All items representing >10%.
Table 4. Contribution of principal food items (%) to dissimilarity in stomach contents between adults and juveniles of Lithodes santolla from Cabo de Hornos. Av.Abund = average abundance of prey item, Av.Diss = average dissimilarity, Diss/SD = average contribution divided by the standard deviation, Contrib% = Contribution to the dissimilarities, Cum% = Cumulative contribution to the dissimilarities. All items representing >10%.
ITEMSAv.AbundAvAbundAvDissDiss/SDContrib%Cum%
AdultsJuveniles
Crustaceans6.171.57121.8119.8419.84
Hydrozoans1.764.078.491.3114.0533.89
Bivalvia2.694.646.851.2911.3445.23
Algae3.612.556.651.1810.9956.22
Average Dissimilarity 83.0
Table 5. Contribution of principal food items (%) to dissimilarity in stomach contents between males and females of Lithodes santolla from Cabo de Hornos. Av.Abund = average abundance of prey item, Av.Diss = average dissimilarity, Diss/SD = average contribution divided by the standard deviation, Contrib% = Contribution to the dissimilarities, Cum% = Cumulative contribution to the dissimilarities. All items representing >10%.
Table 5. Contribution of principal food items (%) to dissimilarity in stomach contents between males and females of Lithodes santolla from Cabo de Hornos. Av.Abund = average abundance of prey item, Av.Diss = average dissimilarity, Diss/SD = average contribution divided by the standard deviation, Contrib% = Contribution to the dissimilarities, Cum% = Cumulative contribution to the dissimilarities. All items representing >10%.
ITEMSAvAbundAvAbundAvDissDiss/SDContrib%Cum%
MaleFemale
Crustaceans18.3712.6411.920.8314.514.5
Hydrozoans10.3116.8411.140.7713.5528.04
Algae14.0910.4510.150.7512.3540.39
Bivalvia11.3913.059.030.7510.9951.38
Fish8.699.438.220.591061.38
Average Dissimilarity 81.2
Table 6. Summary statistics of the isotopic composition of δ13C and δ15N values (range, mean, and standard deviation), sample size, trophic position, diet, feeding mode and sample type of Lithodes santolla, associated fauna, primary producers, and sediment collected in Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Table 6. Summary statistics of the isotopic composition of δ13C and δ15N values (range, mean, and standard deviation), sample size, trophic position, diet, feeding mode and sample type of Lithodes santolla, associated fauna, primary producers, and sediment collected in Nassau Bay, Cape Horn.
Phyla/TaxonNδ15N Range Mean δ15NSDδ13C Range Mean δ13CSDTPDietFeeding ModeSample Type
Arthropoda
Crustacea
Lithodes santolla Adults6010.5–12.611.60.4−16.9–−13.3−14.70.83.3OmPrMT
Lithodes santolla Juveniles2810.9–12.611.40.3−16.4–−14.3−15.30.53.3OmPrMT
Lithodes santolla Males4411.2–12.611.70.4−16.9–−13.3−15.10.83.4OmPrMT
Lithodes santolla Females4410.5–12.211.40.3−16.4–−13.7−14.80.73.2OmPrMT
Lithodes santolla All8810.5–12.611.60.4−16.9–−13.3−14.90.83.3OmPrMT
Paralomis granulosa310.4–11.5110.6−14.7–−14.6−14.70.13.1OmPrMT
Propagurus gaudichaudi312.3–12.712.50.2−16.3–−15.1−15.80.63.7OmSc, DFMT
Eurypodius sp.311.7–12.812.30.5−15.8–−14.6−15.20.63.6OmSc, DFMT
Austromegabalanus psittacus18.7 −19.1 2.1OmSFST, a
Mollusca
Cephalopoda
Enteroctopus megalocyathus613.4–14.213.70.4−16.6–−15.7−16.10.44.2CaPrMT
Gastropoda
Adelomelon ancilla412.7–13.3130.3−15.5–−15.2−15.40.13.9CaPrMT, a
Echinodermata
Asteroidea
Cosmasterias lurida611.4–12.4120.5−16.8–−14.1−15.913.5CaPrTF, a
Chordata
Ascidiacea
Ascidia indet.19.1 −20.3 2.2OmSFST, a
Actinopterygii
Zoarcidae
Crossostomus chilensis410.4–12.311.70.9−15.4–−14.7−150.33.4CaPrMT, b
Porifera
Mycale sp.18.9 –19 2.1OmSFST, a
Haliclona sp.28.2–9.18.60.6−19.8–−18−18.91.32OmSFST, a
Primary producers
Rhodophyta
Gigartina skottsbergii36.5–6.76.60.1−23.2–−22.4−22.80.4 Aut a
Gracilaria chilensis54.3–6.65.81−30.5–−28.9−29.50.6 Aut a
Porphyra columbina26.7–8.17.40.9−21.9–−19.9−20.91.4 Aut a
Chlorophyta
Ulva lactuca36.4–76.70.3−23.7–−23.1−23.40.3 Aut a
Ochrophyta
Macrocystis pyrifera36.1–6.56.30.2−15.6–−15.6−15.60.00 Aut a
Sediment44.9–6.45.60.7−18.6–−18−18.30.3 a
N = sample size; TP = Trophic position; SD = Standard deviation; a = acidified treatment; b = mathematical correction of lipids; Om = Omnivorous; Ca = Carnivorous; Aut = Autotroph; Pr = Predator; Sc = Scavenger; DF = Deposit feeder; SF = Suspension feeder; MT = Muscle tissue; TF = Tube feet; ST = Soft tissue.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrade, C.; Rivera, C.; Daza, E.; Almonacid, E.; Ovando, F.; Morello, F.; Pardo, L.M. Trophic Niche Dynamics and Diet Partitioning of King Crab Lithodes santolla in Chile’s Sub-Antarctic Water. Diversity 2022, 14, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010056

AMA Style

Andrade C, Rivera C, Daza E, Almonacid E, Ovando F, Morello F, Pardo LM. Trophic Niche Dynamics and Diet Partitioning of King Crab Lithodes santolla in Chile’s Sub-Antarctic Water. Diversity. 2022; 14(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrade, Claudia, Cristóbal Rivera, Erik Daza, Eduardo Almonacid, Fernanda Ovando, Flavia Morello, and Luis Miguel Pardo. 2022. "Trophic Niche Dynamics and Diet Partitioning of King Crab Lithodes santolla in Chile’s Sub-Antarctic Water" Diversity 14, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010056

APA Style

Andrade, C., Rivera, C., Daza, E., Almonacid, E., Ovando, F., Morello, F., & Pardo, L. M. (2022). Trophic Niche Dynamics and Diet Partitioning of King Crab Lithodes santolla in Chile’s Sub-Antarctic Water. Diversity, 14(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop