Next Article in Journal
A New Iason Species from Crete (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Anillini) with Notes about Anillini of Greece and Anatolia
Next Article in Special Issue
The Contact Zone of Phylogenetic Lineages of Freshwater Fish in Arctic Eurasia: Genetic Polymorphism of Coregonid Populations
Previous Article in Journal
Itching for an Answer: Gall-Forming Biological Control Agent Contains an Itch Mite Species Found at Localities Known for Periodic ‘Bite Outbreaks’
Previous Article in Special Issue
Amphiboreality and Distribution of Snailfishes (Cottiformes: Liparidae) in the Arctic and the North Atlantic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Natural Selection at the Edge of Life: Allelic Polymorphism and Recruitment in High Latitude Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) Generated and Maintained by Environmental Extremes

1
Department of Zoology, University of Uppsala, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
2
Institute of Freshwater Research, SE-453 30 Drottningholm, Sweden
3
ISACF HQ, Ågatan 22, SE-271 31 Simrishamn, Sweden
Diversity 2023, 15(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010074
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023

Abstract

:
Information from extreme habitats of polymorphic populations is expected to answer questions related to evolutionary changes occurring at their niche border. Landlocked and resident/anadromous populations of the Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus (L.) sp. complex), sampled during three successive years in northern Svalbard, were assessed for life-history characteristics, allele-frequency variation at the polymorphic EST-2* locus, and tested for genotype–environment interactions. While year-class strength correlated positively with mean air temperature during the two summers preceding spawning, the EST-2*100 allele frequency correlated positively with the air temperature in June after birth. By affecting two asynchronous and independent population variables, which are both no doubt correlated with fitness, annual temperature variation is suggested to generate and maintain polymorphism in Arctic char in the High Arctic by modifying year-class strength and selecting for variant alleles influencing cold resistance. Intra- and inter-population comparisons imply an additional selection between the two variant EST-2* alleles to operate ontogenetically, with a fixation on the 90 allele in landlocked and resident individuals and the 100 allele in anadromous individuals. The selective mechanism behind the latter processes is unknown. Because of low substrate specificity, however, esterases may form a reserve of adaptive ability towards environmental stress during contrasting conditions.

1. Introduction

Mechanisms maintaining polymorphic loci in populations are one of the main problems in population genetics, and a perpetual challenge for evolutionary and conservation ecologists. Under what circumstances does natural selection maintain rare alleles in a population? Information from extreme habitats of polymorphic populations may answer such questions. Life at the distributional edge of many species encounters severe environmental conditions, and genetic or phenotypic heterogeneity may be a prerequisite to adaptive changes and population survival under unstable circumstances.
High Arctic lakes constitute extreme habitats, in which landlocked, isolated, and ectothermic organisms may be genetically trapped, and because of colonization difficulties and/or for physiological and ecological reasons, many northern lakes are inhabited by one single taxon of salmonid fish [1,2,3]. On an evolutionary time scale, such surviving populations have had to demonstrate a high capacity of resilience by either adapting to major physical and biotic changes or utilizing available genetic variation; otherwise, they go extinct [4]. Exposure to contrasting environmental changes during repeated events of colonization and isolation during successive episodes of interglaciations is probably a key factor explaining the taxonomic diversity of the extreme phenotypic and ecological plasticity seen among northern salmonids, such as chars (Salvelinus spp.) (e.g., [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]).
Numerous studies have illustrated how incomplete sexual barriers and wide niche utilization may allow gene flow between sympatric populations of congeneric salmonid taxa (see ref. in [13]), while in central populations, besides adaptive changes to environmental gradients, increased interspecific competition and niche compression may cause other adaptive changes, such as character displacement (e.g., [14,15]). Until recently, few studies had demonstrated evolutionary changes occurring at the niche border (e.g., [16,17,18]).
Functional and kinetic differences between allelic variants have been demonstrated in numerous loci and fish taxa (e.g., [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]). In the Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) species complex, the highly polymorphic esterase loci offer a unique tool in testing adaptive changes at the northern species borders because of the correlation between allele frequencies and temperature, both within populations, between year classes, and among populations from different latitudes [26,27,28]. Similar correlations have been reported in other fish taxa as well [29,30,31,32,33]. Major activity changes in esterases have also been documented in individual fish experimentally exposed to increased temperature regimes [34], and a preference for hot-water effluents by individual fish with appropriate esterase genotypes has been suggested to occur [35].
In the present study, data on otolith age and allele-frequency variation within the diallelic EST-2* locus of unexploited populations of Arctic char sampled in northern Svalbard were used to test genotype–environment interactions by analyzing the impact of air temperature on year-class strength and allele-frequency distribution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Arctic Char Species Complex

The Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) sp. complex is the northern-most freshwater fish taxon, and the circumpolar distribution of landlocked, resident, and anadromous populations include High Arctic regions, such as Svalbard, Peary Land, and Ellesmere Island. Although exploiting a variety of habitats, reproduction and over-wintering are invariably restricted to freshwater [1,36,37]. Arctic char are iteroparous, and typically spawn in autumn. While the southern border of this taxon is controlled by interspecific interactions, the northern border seems to be controlled by abiotic barriers [4,38,39,40,41]. While Low Arctic populations commonly employ anadromy to maximize energy intake during the short summer, residency in freshwater all year round seems to be more common among the extreme northern-most populations of char [1,40]. The landlocked populations of char in Svalbard commonly express a bimodal size and age distribution, with cannibalism reinforcing the numerical preponderance of large-sized individuals [42,43,44]. In contrast, populations with mixed resident and anadromous individuals demonstrate comparatively even polymodal size and age structures.

2.2. Sampling and Electrophoretic Analysis

A series of unexploited landlocked and mixed resident–anadromous populations of Arctic char were sampled in northern Svalbard (Figure 1) during the summers of 1979–1981 (Table 1). Test fishing, using multiple mesh size gillnets (10–75 mm) [45], was carried out to assess population structure, prey choice, parasite acquisition, and organic pollutants [40,42,43,46]. Sagittal otoliths were removed for the analysis of age and year-class identification. The age-frequency distribution of the char populations was treated as sampled by the experimental gillnets, i.e., without subsequent adjustment for possible gillnet selection effects and considered to reflect the relative strength of the various year classes represented. In addition, allele-frequency variation within the EST-2* locus was screened with starch gel electrophoresis of serum samples [47] in order to study systematic status [26], genetic differentiation [48,49], and the possibility of a temperature-induced selection processes.

2.3. The EST-2* Locus

The EST-2* locus, with its two codominant alleles 90 and 100, codes for a monomeric esterase enzyme. Nyman and Shaw [50] suggested that the esterase coded for by the EST-2*100 allele has a higher optimal temperature than the variant (90) allele, and the frequency of the 100 allele demonstrates a positive correlation with temperature and declining frequencies in latitude (e.g., [10,26]. Temperature is known to influence enzymatic processes, including the activity of hydrolyzing enzymes, such as esterases. The functional significance of the products of the EST-2* locus in Arctic char is, however, unknown, and a precise classification is difficult due to their overlapping substrate specificity. Using substrate and inhibitor-specificity methods, Nyman [51] classified the polymorphic serum esterase in salmonids as a carboxylic ester hydrolase with a selective affinity for alpha-naphthyl propionate. Carboxyl esterases hydrolyze various organic carboxy-ester-bonds, including lipid substrates, and in the Arctic char, the EST-2* allozymes are present in the serum, liver, muscle, and external mucus [26].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

For genotype–temperature comparisons, air temperature data for the period 1956–1975 were available from Jan Mayen and another four weather stations in Svalbard (Figure 1). Complete sets of monthly mean air temperatures were considered variables adequately reflecting the thermic conditions in the lakes during summer. The closest weather stations were Isfjord Radio and Hopen, with Isfjord Radio being more representative of the western parts affected by the Golf Current, and Hopen being more representative of the eastern and harsher regions of Svalbard.
Linear association was tested using Pearson’s coefficients for air temperature and two different sets of year-class variables. Correlations between relative year-class strength and mean annual, seasonal, and monthly temperatures were restricted to 1959–73, with the oldest year classes being disregarded because of their rare occurrence in the catches, and the youngest year classes because of the size-selective properties of the gillnets [45]. In order to identify seasonal patterns in relationships, and to avoid unwarranted conclusions because of spurious associations expected to occur in any large matrix of bivariate comparisons, year-class strength correlations were also tested with a displaced series of mean temperature representing the years before, as well as after, the actual year of birth. The probability values were adjusted for the number of tests using the sequential Bonferroni technique [52]. The correlation between the EST-2*100 allele frequency and mean annual temperature was restricted to the middle year classes of 1960–1971, assumed to be least affected by ontogenetic changes in viability.

3. Results

The number of individuals from different year classes of the five landlocked populations examined varied greatly, suggesting variable success in recruitment across the years as a reasonable explanation. In the sample, the number of char born in 1959–63 and 1972–74 surpasses the number of char born during the colder period of 1964–71, indicating a possible covariation with temperature (Figure 2). Linear correlation tests with the pooled age structures, presented as relative year-class strengths for landlocked populations, showed positive relationships with temperature for June–September of the preceding year (R2 = 0.550, n = 15, p = 0.002), as well as for the same period two years earlier (R2 = 0.493, n = 15, p = 0.004). A combination of the mean temperatures during the two previous summers was found to explain 73 percent of the year-class strength of landlocked Arctic char in a given year (p < 0.001). When tested on the total sample of char, the correlation remained, proving that year-class-strength determination basically takes place in June–September of the previous year (R2 = 0.624, n = 15, p < 0.001, Figure 3A) with a mean summer air temperature of below 3 °C, generating fewer recruits than the predicted average year class the next year (Mann–Whitney U-test, U = 4.0, p < 0.01).
The EST-2*100 allele-frequency distribution among year classes of the total sample correlated positively with mean air temperature (R2 = 0.390, p = 0.030, n = 12, Figure 3B). More specifically, in landlocked populations, the correlation suggests selection for the 100 allele when the mean air temperature exceeds 1.5 °C in June, i.e., shortly after hatching (R2 = 0.842, p < 0.001, n = 9).
While anadromous populations intermix genetically via strayers and thus maintain genetic variation and geographic cohesion, alleles in resident and landlocked populations tend to become fixed due to isolation, reduced population size, and perhaps less unstable environmental conditions (Figure 4). In landlocked High Arctic populations, this could lead to a fixation of the EST-2*90 allele, as seems plausible from a comparison of the allele frequencies of the anadromous, resident, and landlocked populations (Table 2), with all the resident and landlocked populations possessing lower frequencies of the 100 allele (Mann–Whitney U-test, 10 pop., U = 0.0, p = 0.017). In one anadromous population (L. Arkvatn), a dramatic increase occurs in the frequency of the 100 allele at the age (>14 years) and size (>200 mm) at smoltification. Deviation from Castle–Hardy–Weinberg proportions and the change in allele frequencies, indicating a shift in the direction of selection, is also apparent (Table 3). This suggests an opposite, strong selective process to operate during a few weeks of feeding in saltwater. If the coastal water temperature is higher or lower than in fresh water, the area is not known. Differences in genotype distribution between landlocked (pooled) and anadromous (L. Arkvatn) individuals in three successive age groups, namely 4–10, 11–20, and 21–27 (Chi-square = 7.32–27.62, p < 0.005, d.f. 1), imply that old anadromous char tend to be homozygous for the 100 allele, whereas old landlocked char tend to be homozygous for the 90 allele (Figure 5). The present data do not yield comparisons of phenotype performance within year classes, although such an analysis would probably illustrate genetic differentiation [23,24].

4. Discussion

In addition to cannibalism and parasites [43], temperature is also found to affect the magnitude of year-class strength and thus the demography of High Arctic populations of Arctic char; therefore, it may thus explain the exaggerated bimodal population structure recorded in 1979–81 in Svalbard. The present results demonstrate a climatic impact on year-class strength both one and two years before birth, thus pointing at the significance of parental traits affecting reproduction, such as the sexual maturity process, frequency of spawners, and number and quality of eggs.
As in most northern animals, any factor reducing the accumulation of energy of juveniles during their first summer is likely to reduce their survival during the first critical winter. This has long been a principle suggested to govern year-class strength among temperate fishes and has been especially emphasized among such species at their northern-most distributional limits (e.g., [53]). A latitudinal reduction in the growth period, used in the past as an evolutionary argument for autumn spawning and early spring hatching among northern salmonids [54], may thus be a serious constraint to somatic, as well as gonadal, growth. Anadromous char may stay for an entire year in freshwater in order to fully develop their gonads and may need at least another year to recover after spawning [55]. Energy resources built up by early spring may influence whether energy is allocated to gonads or continued somatic growth [56,57]. In Svalbard, individual landlocked char seem to spawn at least every third year until well above 20 years of age [43]. The present results suggest that the maturity process is influenced by the temperature in the summer preceding spawning, with a mean temperature for June–September of less than ca 3 °C, generating fewer recruits than average in the next year. A series of warmer summers provide the potential for higher numbers of recruits in High Arctic char which, during the actual year of hatching, face selection among variant EST-2* genotypes. Three successive “warm” summers may thus generate a large year class of individuals with a reduced ability to cope with extreme cold. The temporally displaced selection processes influencing year-class strength and allele frequency are proposed to grant the maintenance of both alleles, and thus also polymorphism, in isolated populations living in the far north.
This model may perhaps explain the genetic divergence of sympatric Arctic char in Lake Johansvatn, Danskøya [42]. Almost contrasting distributions of genotypes shift from one modal group to another in less than 10 years (Figure 6). However, differential mortality is unlikely to cause a dramatic change in EST-2*100 frequencies between two modal gene pools of adult fish. One alternative explanation is that the lower modal group with a high allele frequency (0.74 ± 0.15) was born during a series of warmer years or is the offspring of a rich year class of parents born during a series of such years, while the low frequency group (0.34 ± 0.17) has the opposite origin. The two groups thus seem to be genetically isolated by their year of recruitment. Another explanation is simply that the Arctic char in Lake Johansvatn is yet another example of coexisting, reproductively isolated populations of either pre- or post-glacial origin, or both (e.g., [8,48,49,58,59,60]).
The findings in Svalbard raise the question of the exact mechanisms involved in the selection, and thus the functional significance of the allozymes produced by the EST-2* locus in Arctic char. As shown by the latitudinal gradients and year class–temperature correlations, esterases seem primarily to be involved in a temperature-dependent process affecting juvenile survival. Koehn [30] provided elegant molecular evidence of temperature-related differences in the direct activity of different allozymes, fitting with his observations of a latitudinal cline of allele frequencies. The present study adds a selective process connected with differential survival during repeated transformations to a life in the sea. The striking decline of homozygotes and heterozygotes for the EST-2*90 allele among older and larger individuals in Lake Arkvatn strongly suggests a selective loss of individuals from the system (Table 3). Selection favoring the EST-2*90 allele in freshwater and the EST-2*100 allele in saltwater suggests a disruptive selection, although the mechanism of such a selective process is not known. Anadromy manifests a major change in physiology, growth, and diet, as well as in dramatic exposure to the marine environment. Additionally, in comparison to other salmonids, Arctic char seem to be less capable of acclimating to the marine habitat. Besides the stress, the metamorphosis of smoltifying fish induces a number of extraordinary physiological changes, and the exact mechanism of selection may be found among changes in the activity of various enzymes and hormones, increased lipid utilization, etc. Individuals which have not yet acquired the ability to osmoregulate die if they are transferred to sea water, and smolts which are prevented from migrating to sea may also die (e.g., [61]). The fact that esterases are active in external mucus may indicate a defense function towards various environmental toxicants. Smith [32] indicated that the selection agent may be an associated parameter, such as salinity, pH, or even food, because esterases are known to act on externally derived substrates. Carboxyl esterases have been suggested to form a reserve of adaptive ability towards certain toxicants and pollutants, and the fact that they have a low substrate specificity makes them more efficient in destroying a variety of foreign agents [62]. Another parameter combining temperature with differential survival and smoltification is the photoperiod. Temperature, and thus latitudinal gradients and ice cover duration, are likely to affect the photoperiod perception of fish, and this has been pointed out as a major synchronizing cue for year-class strength and seasonal cycles of growth, as well as smolting in juvenile salmonids [63,64].
Other enzyme loci isozymes, particularly the products of the LDH-B* locus [24], are also differentially selected in different thermal environments. This suggests the possibility of polygenic correlations, including the combined effects of several genes, and in an important study of vendace (Coregonus albula) transplanted 92 years earlier into a new and colder environment, significant changes in eight of ten polymorphic loci were detected [65].

5. Conclusions

The relative strength of year classes and their frequency in the EST-2*100 allele has been found to correlate positively with summer temperature in high latitude Arctic char. The climatic impact on these two fitness-correlated population variables seem to vary asynchronically, with relative year-class strength being correlated with temperature during one or two summers preceding spawning, and year-class allele frequency being correlated with temperature after hatching. The results suggest temperature affects parental traits, thus affecting reproductive success, as well as selection of a variant allele influencing cold resistance. As a complication, an additional ontogenetic option between the two variant EST-2* alleles, generated by selection in coastal habitats, may also evolve. Varying selection processes during warm and cold summers, and because of contrasting habitat conditions for resident and anadromous char, may thus generate and maintain allelic polymorphism in these marginal populations. My results also imply that landlocked populations in the High Arctic may have adapted to cold freshwater conditions and, in the process, lost capability to adopt an anadromous life history. With the ongoing dramatic increase in environmental temperature in the Arctic [66,67], these conclusions may already be historical.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge all generous help from the enthusiastic crews of the various rubber-boat, icebreaker, helicopter, and other research-vessel expeditions employed during 1979–1981 in Svalbard, and to Thor Larsen, N.P.I., for supplying me with necessary permissions. Asta Guttormsdóttir, D.N.M.I., kindly provided me with temperature data from Svalbard. I also wish to express my deep thanks to Boris Mednikov, Lennart Nyman, Tiit Paaver, Ksenia Savvaitova, Gunnar Svärdson, and Eric Verspoor for many stimulating discussions, and a very special thank you to Staffan Ulfstrand, Anders Berglund, and two anonymous reviewers for very constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The research has mainly been financed by myself, although financial support from the Nordic Council for Ecology, the Ymer-80 Foundation, and the Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, is kindly acknowledged. An early compilation of the manuscript as part of a doctoral thesis in 1998 was supported by the Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Johnson, L. The arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. In Charrs, Salmonid Fishes of the Genus Salvelinus; Balon, E.K., Ed.; Dr W. Junk Publishers: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 15–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hammar, J. Freshwater ecosystems of Polar Regions: Vulnerable resources. Ambio 1989, 18, 6–22. [Google Scholar]
  3. Christiansen, J.S.; Reist, J.D.; Brown, R.J.; Brykov, V.A.; Christensen, G.; Christoffersen, K.; Cott, P.; Crane, P.; Dempson, J.B.; Docker, M.; et al. Fishes. In Arctic Biodiversity Assessment. Status and Trends in Arctic Biodiversity; Meltofte, H., Ed.; Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF): Akureyri, Iceland, 2013; Chapter 6; pp. 192–245. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hammar, J. Natural resilience in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus: Life history, spatial and dietary alterations along gradients of interspecific interactions. J. Fish Biol. 2014, 85, 81–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Behnke, R.J. The systematics of salmonid fishes of recently glaciated lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1972, 29, 639–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Behnke, R.J. A systematic review of the genus Salvelinus. In Charrs, Salmonid Fishes of the Genus Salvelinus; Balon, E.K., Ed.; Dr W. Junk Publishers: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 441–480. [Google Scholar]
  7. Savvaitova, K.A. The application of the biological species concept to evaluation of the systematic position of chars of the genus Salvelinus (Salmonidae). J. Ichthyol. 1983, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Savvaitova, K.A. Patterns of diversity and processes of speciation in Arctic char. Nord. J. Freshw. Res. 1995, 71, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chereshnev, I.A. On the Systematics and Phylogeny of Charrs of the Genus Salvelinus: Taxonomic Relationships of Sympatric Anadromous Charrs of North-East Asia; Hammar, J., Ed.; ISACF Information Series; Institute of Freshwater Research: Drottningholm, Sweden, 1991; Volume 5, pp. 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hammar, J. Evolutionary Ecology of Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)): Intra- and Interspecific Interactions in Circumpolar Populations; Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology Series; Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Uppsala, Sweden, 1998; Volume 408. [Google Scholar]
  11. Reist, J.D.; Power, M.; Dempson, J.B. Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus): A case study of the importance of understanding biodiversity and taxonomic issues in northern fishes. Biodiversity 2012, 14, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Klemetsen, A. The most variable vertebrate on earth. J. Ichthyol. 2013, 53, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verspoor, E.; Hammar, J. Introgressive hybridization in fishes: The biochemical evidence. J. Fish Biol. 1991, 39 (Suppl. A), 309–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Robinson, B.W.; Wilson, D.S. Character release and displacement in fishes: A neglected literature. Am. Nat. 1994, 144, 596–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schluter, D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; p. 288. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoffmann, A.A.; Parsons, P.A. Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1991; pp. 1–284. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoffmann, A.A.; Parsons, P.A. Extreme Environmental Change and Evolution; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; pp. 1–259. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann, A.A.; Blows, M.W. Species borders: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. DiMichele, L.; Powers, D.A. Ldh-B genotype specific hatching times of Fundulus heteroclitus embryos. Nature 1982, 296, 563–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Smith, M.W.; Smith, M.H.; Chesser, R.K. Biochemical genetics of mosquitofish. I. Environmental correlates and temporal and spatial heterogeneity of allele frequencies within a river drainage. Copeia 1983, 1, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gauldie, R.W. Allelic variation and fisheries management. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Fish. Res. Bull. 1984, 26, 35. [Google Scholar]
  22. Philipp, D.P.; Childers, W.F.; Whitt, G.S. Correlations of allele frequencies with physical and environmental variables for populations of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepede). J. Fish Biol. 1985, 27, 347–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jordan, W.C.; Youngson, A.F. Genetic protein variation and natural selection in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr. J. Fish Biol. 1991, 39 (Suppl. A), 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Powers, D.A.; Lauerman, T.; Crawford, D.; Smith, M.; Gonzalez-Villasenor, I.; DiMichele, L. The evolutionary significance of genetic variation at enzyme synthesizing loci in the teleost Fundulus heteroclitus. J. Fish Biol. 1991, 39 (Suppl. A), 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kirpichnikov, V.S. Adaptive nature of intrapopulational biochemical polymorphism in fish. J. Fish Biol. 1992, 40, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nyman, L. A new approach to the taxonomy of the Salvelinus alpinus species complex. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1972, 52, 103–131. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nyman, L.; Filipsson, O. The chars of Lake Yraf. Inform. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1972, 10, 20. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
  28. Dempson, J.B.; Verspoor, E.; Hammar, J. Intrapopulation variation of the Esterase-2 polymorphism in the serum of anadromous Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, from a northern Labrador river. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1988, 45, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koehn, R.K.; Rasmussen, D.I. Polymorphic and monomorphic serum esterase heterogeneity in catastomid fish populations. Biochem. Genet. 1967, 1, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koehn, R.K. Functional and evolutionary dynamics of polymorphic esterases in catastomid fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1970, 99, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johnson, M.S. Association of allozymes and temperature in the crested blenny Anoplarchus purpurescens. Mar. Biol. 1977, 41, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, P.J. Esterase gene frequencies and temperature relationships in the New Zealand snapper Chrysophrys auratus. Mar. Biol. 1979, 53, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kornfield, I.; Sidell, B.D.; Gagnon, P.S. Stock definition in Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus harengus): Genetic evidence for discrete fall and spring spawning populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1982, 39, 1610–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shaklee, J.B.; Christiansen, J.A.; Sidell, B.D.; Prosser, C.L.; Whitt, G.S. Molecular aspects of temperature acclimation in fish: Contributions of changes in enzyme activities and isozyme patterns to metabolic reorganization in the green sunfish. J. Exp. Zool. 1977, 201, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nyman, L. Allelic selection in a fish (Gymnocephalus cernua (L.)) subjected to hotwater effluents. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1975, 54, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson, L. The anadromous Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, of Nayuk Lake, N.W.T., Canada. Phys. Ecol. 1989, 1, 201–227. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dempson, J.B.; Kristofferson, A.H. Spatial and temporal aspects of the ocean migration of anadromous Arctic char. Am. Fish. 1987, 1, 340–357. [Google Scholar]
  38. Filipsson, O.; Svärdson, G. Principles for the management of char populations. Inform. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1976, 2, 1–78. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
  39. Hammar, J. Zoogeographical Zonation of Fish Communities in Insular Newfoundland; A Preliminary Attempt to Use the Arctic Char Population Ecology to Describe Early Postglacial Colonization Interactions; Hammar, J., Nyman, L., Eds.; ISACF Information Series; Institute of Freshwater Research: Drottningholm, Sweden, 1987; Volume 4, pp. 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hammar, J. Speciation Processes in the High Arctic: Hardly as Simple as the Environment might Suggest; Hammar, J., Ed.; ISACF Information Series; Institute of Freshwater Research: Drottningholm, Sweden, 1991; Volume 5, pp. 73–88. [Google Scholar]
  41. Power, M.; Dempson, J.B.; Power, G.; Reist, J.D. Environmental influences on an exploited anadromous Arctic charr stock in Labrador. J. Fish Biol. 2000, 57, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hammar, J. Arctic char in Arctic regions. Fauna Flora 1982, 77, 85–92. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
  43. Hammar, J. Cannibals and parasites-conflicting regulators of bimodality in high latitude Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)). Oikos 2000, 88, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Svenning, M.-A.; Borgstrøm, R. Population structure in landlocked Spitsbergen Arctic charr. Sustained by cannibalism? Nord. J. Freshw. Res. 1995, 71, 424–431. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hammar, J.; Filipsson, O. Ecological testfishing with the Lundgren gillnets of multiple mesh size: The Drottningholm technique modified for Newfoundland Arctic char populations. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1985, 62, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kylin, H.; Hammar, J.; Mowrer, J.; Bouwman, H.; Edelstam, C.; Olsson, M.; Jensen, S. Persistent organic pollutants in biota samples collected during the Ymer-80 expedition to the Arctic. Polar Res. 2015, 34, 21129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nyman, L. Protein variations in Salmonidae. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1967, 47, 5–38. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nyman, L.; Hammar, J.; Gydemo, R. The systematics and biology of landlocked populations of Arctic char from northern Europe. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1981, 59, 128–141. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hammar, J. Ecological characters of different combinations of sympatric populations of Arctic charr in Sweden. In Biology of the Arctic Charr. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Arctic Charr; Johnson, L., Burns, B.L., Eds.; University of Manitoba Press: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1984; pp. 35–63. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nyman, L.; Shaw, D.H. Molecular weight heterogeneity of serum esterases in four species of salmonid fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1971, 40B, 563–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nyman, O.L. Electrophoretic analysis of hybrids between salmon (Salmo salar L.) and trout (Salmo trutta L.). Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1970, 99, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rice, W.R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 1989, 43, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lindström, T.; Bergstrand, E. The habitat of perch Perca fluviatilis L. on the outskirts of its Swedish distribution, lakes and lake reservoirs. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1979, 58, 55–76. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nordqvist, O. Några biologiska orsaker till sötvattensfiskarnas nuvarande utbredning i Finland. (Biological reasons for the present distribution of fresh-water fish in Finland). Fisk. Finl. 1903, 12, 133–142. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
  55. Dutil, J.-D. Energetic constraints and spawning interval in the anadromous Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Copeia 1986, 4, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thorpe, J.E. Age at first maturity in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, freshwater period influences and conflicts with smolting. In Salmonid Age at Maturity; Meerburg, D.J., Ed.; Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 89: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1986; pp. 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rowe, D.K.; Thorpe, J.E.; Shanks, A.M. Role of fat stores in the maturation of male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1991, 48, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Klemetsen, A. The charr problem revisited: Exceptional phenptypic plasticity promotes ecological speciation in postglacial lakes. Freshw. Rev. 2010, 3, 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Verspoor, E.; Knox, D.; Greer, R.; Hammar, J. Mitochondrial DNA variation in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) morphs from Loch Rannoch, Scotland: Evidence for allopatric and peripatric divergence. Hydrobiologia 2010, 650, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alekseyev, S.S.; Pichugin, M.Y.; Gordeeva, N.V.; Samusenok, V.P.; Yur’ev, A.L.; Khlystov, V.S.; Matveev, A.N. Reproductive Strategies and the Origin of Parapatric and Sympatric Forms of Arctic Charr Salvelinus alpinus (Salmonidae) in the System of Lakes Bol’shoe Leprindo and Maloe Leprindo. J. Ichthyol. 2019, 59, 527–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Love, R.M. The Chemical Biology of Fishes; Academic Press: London, UK, 1980; Volume 2, p. 943. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gantberg, A.N.; Perevoznikov, M.A.; Rozengart, V.I.; Sherstobitov, O.E. Peculiarities of resistance of some freshwater fishes to Carbophos. J. Ichthyol. 1989, 29, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  63. Clarke, W.C. Photoperiod control of smolting: A review. Phys. Ecol. 1989, 1, 497–502. [Google Scholar]
  64. Borgstrøm, R.; Museth, J. Accumulated snow and summer temperature–critical factors for recruitment to high mountain populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Ecol. Freshw. Fish 2005, 14, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vuorinen, J.; Næsje, T.F.; Sandlund, O.-T. Genetic changes in a vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) population, 92 years after introduction. J. Fish Biol. 1991, 39 (Suppl. A), 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. ACIA. Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  67. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The geography of Svalbard at 74–81° North and 9–33° East, with sampling sites and weather stations.
Figure 1. The geography of Svalbard at 74–81° North and 9–33° East, with sampling sites and weather stations.
Diversity 15 00074 g001
Figure 2. Year-class strength, shown as pooled numbers of all sampled landlocked char born in specific years, and the corresponding mean annual air temperature recorded at Isfjord Radio weather station.
Figure 2. Year-class strength, shown as pooled numbers of all sampled landlocked char born in specific years, and the corresponding mean annual air temperature recorded at Isfjord Radio weather station.
Diversity 15 00074 g002
Figure 3. Correlation between air temperature recorded at Isfjord Radio. (A) Year-class strength, shown as pooled numbers of all sampled char born in the years 1959–73 (Mean temp., June–September, the year previous to birth), and (B) frequencies of the EST-2*100 allele in the year classes 1960–71 (Mean annual temp., current year).
Figure 3. Correlation between air temperature recorded at Isfjord Radio. (A) Year-class strength, shown as pooled numbers of all sampled char born in the years 1959–73 (Mean temp., June–September, the year previous to birth), and (B) frequencies of the EST-2*100 allele in the year classes 1960–71 (Mean annual temp., current year).
Diversity 15 00074 g003
Figure 4. A model demonstrating the evolutionary processes comprising gene flow and/or reproductive isolation within two closely oriented gene pools of anadromous, resident, and eventually landlocked Arctic char.
Figure 4. A model demonstrating the evolutionary processes comprising gene flow and/or reproductive isolation within two closely oriented gene pools of anadromous, resident, and eventually landlocked Arctic char.
Diversity 15 00074 g004
Figure 5. Ontogenetic shifts in the EST-2* genotype dominance in (A) landlocked (pooled populations, n = 97) and (B) anadromous (Lake Arkvatn, n = 107) Arctic char sampled in Svalbard, 1979–81.
Figure 5. Ontogenetic shifts in the EST-2* genotype dominance in (A) landlocked (pooled populations, n = 97) and (B) anadromous (Lake Arkvatn, n = 107) Arctic char sampled in Svalbard, 1979–81.
Diversity 15 00074 g005
Figure 6. EST-2* genotype designation and length by otolith age correlations in two modal groups of landlocked Arctic char sampled in Lake Johansvatn, Danskøya, Svalbard, 20–21 August 1981.
Figure 6. EST-2* genotype designation and length by otolith age correlations in two modal groups of landlocked Arctic char sampled in Lake Johansvatn, Danskøya, Svalbard, 20–21 August 1981.
Diversity 15 00074 g006
Table 1. Geographic position of lakes surveyed in Svalbard, and the size and age range of the samples of Arctic char analyzed. While the char from Lakes Diesetvatn and Sirkelvatn were collected with seine and hook, respectively, the remainder were caught with multiple mesh size gillnets. The life-history abbreviations refer to anadromous (A), resident (R), and landlocked (L) populations.
Table 1. Geographic position of lakes surveyed in Svalbard, and the size and age range of the samples of Arctic char analyzed. While the char from Lakes Diesetvatn and Sirkelvatn were collected with seine and hook, respectively, the remainder were caught with multiple mesh size gillnets. The life-history abbreviations refer to anadromous (A), resident (R), and landlocked (L) populations.
LakesPosition of OutletLife-HistoryNLengthWeightAgeDate of Sampling
LatitudeLongitudeA/R/L MTL (mm)(Gram)(Years)(y-m-d)
Diesetvatn79°12′ N11°22′ EA5427–578-8–131979.07.22
Linnévatn78°04′ N13°48′ EA + R17114–2629–1375–121980.09.09
Arkvatn80°25′ N22°57′ EA + R108101–6157–18805–241980.08.16
Wibjørnvatn *80°09′ N18°28′ EL2697–4336–5204–261980.08.20
Jensenvatn79°43′ N10°51′ EL7371–590562–19907–181979.07.29, 1981.08.24
Johansvatn *79°40′ N10°48′ EL34100–5657–13006–241981.08.21
Annavatn *79°46′ N10°53′ EL28117–4958–8259–261981.08.23
Sirkelvatn80°12′ N22°52′ EL4382–420-26–271980.07.16
* These names are unofficial working names used by the author in previous reports; thus, they may be altered in future publications.
Table 2. Observed allele and genotype frequencies, their expected genotype distribution (in parentheses), deviation from the Castle–Hardy–Weinberg proportions, and the 95% confidence interval at the EST-2* locus in anadromous (A), resident (R), and landlocked (L) Arctic char in Svalbard.
Table 2. Observed allele and genotype frequencies, their expected genotype distribution (in parentheses), deviation from the Castle–Hardy–Weinberg proportions, and the 95% confidence interval at the EST-2* locus in anadromous (A), resident (R), and landlocked (L) Arctic char in Svalbard.
Observed (Expected) Distribution
LakeLife-Hist.nf(100)90/9090/100100/100χ2p95% c.i.
DiesetvatnA50.9000 (0.1)1 (0.9)4 (4.1)0.0620.970.190
LinnévatnA40.8750 (0.1)1 (0.9)3 (3.1)0.0820.960.234
R130.6921 (1.2)6 (5.5)6 (6.2)0.0900.960.181
Total170.7351 (1.2)7 (6.6)9 (9.2)0.0570.970.151
ArkvatnA580.8194 (1.9)13 (17.2)41 (38.9)3.4560.180.072
R500.6107 (7.6)25 (23.8)18 (18.6)0.1290.940.098
Total1080.72211 (8.3)38 (43.3)59 (56.3)1.6360.440.061
WibjørnvatnL260.7881 (1.2)9 (8.7)16 (16.2)0.0370.980.113
JensenvatnL70.7140 (0.6)4 (2.9)3 (3.6)1.1201.120.241
JohansvatnL#1170.7351 (1.2)7 (6.6)9 (9.2)0.0570.570.151
JohansvatnL#2160.3446 (6.9)9 (7.2)1 (1.9)0.9740.970.168
JohansvatnTotal330.5457 (6.8)16 (16.4)10 (9.8)0.0160.990.123
AnnavatnL280.4469 (8.6)13 (13.8)6 (5.6)0.1030.950.133
SirkelvatnL30.0003 (3.0)0 (0)0 (0)---
Table 3. Observed allele and genotype frequencies, their expected genotype distribution (in parentheses), deviation from the Castle–Hardy–Weinberg proportions, and the 95% confidence interval at the EST-2* locus in different sex and age groups of anadromous/resident Arctic char from Lake Arkvatn, Svalbard.
Table 3. Observed allele and genotype frequencies, their expected genotype distribution (in parentheses), deviation from the Castle–Hardy–Weinberg proportions, and the 95% confidence interval at the EST-2* locus in different sex and age groups of anadromous/resident Arctic char from Lake Arkvatn, Svalbard.
Age and Sex GroupsObserved (Expected) Distribution
Age Groups, Totalnf(100)90/9090/100100/100χ2p95% c.i.
9–5350.6005 (5.6)18 (16.8)12 (12.6)0.1790.910.117
10–14290.6554 (3.5)12 (13.1)13 (12.5)0.2060.900.125
15–19280.8931 (0.3)4 (5.4)23 (22.3)1.7970.410.083
20–24150.8331 (0.4)3 (4.2)11 (10.4)1.1760.560.136
Age groups, males
9–5260.5965 (4.2)11 (12.5)10 (9.2)0.3830.830.136
10–14170.6761 (1.8)9 (7.4)7 (7.8)0.7460.690.160
15–19150.9331 (0.1)0 (1.9)14 (13.1)15.00<0.0010.091
20–24120.8331 (0.3)2 (3.3)9 (8.3)1.9200.380.152
Age groups, females
9–590.6110 (1.4)7 (4.3)2 (3.4)3.6450.160.230
10–14120.6253 (1.7)3 (5.6)6 (4.7)2.6130.270.198
15–19130.8460 (0.3)4 (3.4)9 (9.3)0.4300.810.142
20–2420.7500 (0.1)1 (0.8)1 (1.1)0.2220.890.433
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hammar, J. Natural Selection at the Edge of Life: Allelic Polymorphism and Recruitment in High Latitude Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) Generated and Maintained by Environmental Extremes. Diversity 2023, 15, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010074

AMA Style

Hammar J. Natural Selection at the Edge of Life: Allelic Polymorphism and Recruitment in High Latitude Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) Generated and Maintained by Environmental Extremes. Diversity. 2023; 15(1):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hammar, Johan. 2023. "Natural Selection at the Edge of Life: Allelic Polymorphism and Recruitment in High Latitude Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) Generated and Maintained by Environmental Extremes" Diversity 15, no. 1: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010074

APA Style

Hammar, J. (2023). Natural Selection at the Edge of Life: Allelic Polymorphism and Recruitment in High Latitude Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) Generated and Maintained by Environmental Extremes. Diversity, 15(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop