Next Article in Journal
Highly Substituted Phenol Derivatives with Nitric Oxide Inhibitory Activities from the Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Trichobotrys effuse FS524
Next Article in Special Issue
Clavukoellians G–K, New Nardosinane and Aristolane Sesquiterpenoids with Angiogenesis Promoting Activity from the Marine Soft Coral Lemnalia sp.
Previous Article in Journal
New Thiodiketopiperazine and 3,4-Dihydroisocoumarin Derivatives from the Marine-Derived Fungus Aspergillus terreus
Previous Article in Special Issue
One-Step Preparative Separation of Phytosterols from Edible Brown Seaweed Sargassum horneri by High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extraction, Identification, Modification, and Antibacterial Activity of Histone from Immature Testis of Atlantic salmon

College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2020, 18(3), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/md18030133
Submission received: 18 January 2020 / Revised: 21 February 2020 / Accepted: 23 February 2020 / Published: 26 February 2020

Abstract

:
In the present study, histone from immature testis of Atlantic salmon was extracted and identified, and its antibacterial activity after enzymolysis was investigated. Histone extracted from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) testis using the acid extraction method was successfully identified by LC-MS/MS, and revealed significant inhibitory activity on both the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. With a low concentration of 10 mg/mL, the observed inhibitory zone diameter (IZD) could significantly reach up to 15.23 mm. After modification of enzymatic hydrolysis by pepsin, histone could be digested to three fragments, while the antibacterial activity increased up to 57.7%. All the results suggested the leftovers from commercial fishing could be utilized for the extraction of antimicrobial peptides.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small molecular peptides with a varying number of amino acids known to have a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity [1,2]. Most AMPs, generally consisting of 12–100 amino acid residues, are amphiphilic cationic peptides containing hydrophobic amino acids [3]. AMPs have been recognized as one of the most efficient alternatives to the existing use of antibiotics [4], revealing its major role in innate immunity characterized by broad-spectrum, high efficiency, selective toxicity, stability, and low drug resistance, respectively [5].
Protamine, which is a polycationic peptide existing in the mature testis of fish with a molecular weight of 4.0–4.5 KDa [6,7], is known to possess a variety of biological activities such as bacterial inhibition, anticoagulation, and promoting digestion [8,9,10]. In a previous report, histone has been determined as a nucleoprotein that tightly bounds to the DNA [11]. Meanwhile, the large amounts of lysine content in histones have led to it emerging as a potential food preservative, mainly owing to its stable structure and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity.
Several previous studies have reported that histones have significant inhibitory activity on aquatic organisms. Fernandes et al. (2004) reported that oncorhyncin II, which was a histone-derived peptide, isolated and purified from the acidic extract of skin secretion of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), revealed significant antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive (G+) and Gram-negative (G−) bacteria [12]. The acidic extract from the epidermal mucus of the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) showed antimicrobial activity against Bacillus megaterium, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans [13]. De Zoysa et al. (2009) discovered a highly efficient histone-derived antimicrobial peptide from Haliotis discus discus, which could be induced in blood cells, digestive tract, and colony tissues after infecting Abalone with various bacteria [14]. Histone had also revealed high inhibitory activity on human monocytic leukemia cancer cells (THP-1) in vitro, while the survival rate of normal cells in the control group did not decline [15]. Eskandarian et al. (2013) discovered that histone modification was an important epigenetic modification, which precisely regulated the innate immune response and the expression of corresponding defense genes [16].
The previous studies on AMPs extracted from the testis of Atlantic salmon were mainly focused on the extraction of protamine and its antibacterial activity, with very little information available on the application of histone in immature testis of Atlantic salmon [17]. Studies on the maturation stage of fish sperm cells have revealed that chromatin in the inactive state is composed of histone polymers encased in DNA to form nucleosomes, which are then folded into higher-order structures by nucleosome fibers. As the testes mature, protamine replaces histones and binds to DNA to form highly dense sperm chromatin [18]. The composition and content of nuclein in the testis of fishes with different maturity were different. There was almost no protamine in immature fish testicles, and the amount of protamine increased during the maturation of testis, reaching a large amount at the end of maturation when protamine bound to DNA as a substitute histone for nucleosin [19]. Therefore, mature fish sperms were more suitable for protamine extraction, while the immature fish sperms comprised of a fairly large amount of histone. Owing to the advanced commercial fishing technology and the increase in overfishing, a large proportion of Atlantic salmon males was caught before the maturation of their gonads and maturity stage. In addition, the gonads of Atlantic salmon males were often treated as leftovers for fodder, fertilizer, or abandoned, resulting in a great amount of waste. Therefore, in this study, the histone was extracted and identified from immature testis of Atlantic salmon and its antibacterial activity before and after modification was mainly investigated to obtain the best natural antimicrobial peptide fragments.

2. Results

2.1. SDS-Page and Tris-Tricine-Sds-Page Electrophoresis

The histone extracted from salmon sperm was a single component with the relative molecular weight of about 30 KDa (Figure 1a); it was much bigger than that of the commercial protamine, which was known to have two bands with the molecular weight of 4 KDa and 7 KDa (Figure 1b), respectively.

2.2. Histone Identification

The extracted histone was identified by LC-MS/MS and the peak was labeled using data analysis software, after which the Mascot search in Uniprot was performed. The search conditions and parameters are shown in Table 1, and the partial comparison results in the Uniprot database are shown in Table 2. The results revealed that the highest matching degree of the extracted protein was salmon histone H1, with 38% matching peptide coverage and 1268 evaluation scores (Figure 2). Although the matching degree was not so high, it could be confirmed that the extracted product was histone according to its specific fragment and fraction judgment. There was a significant difference between the above 27 scores, which was an important result obtained.

2.3. Histone Modification

Histone was modified by protease hydrolysis with papain, pepsin, trypsin, flavor protease, and alkaline protease. When incubated for 1 h, histone was completely hydrolyzed by papain, trypsin, flavor protease, and alkaline protease, and three other bands appeared after pepsin hydrolysis (Figure 3a). After 5 h incubation, histone was completely hydrolyzed by pepsin, which was observed by the three new bands at molecular weights of about 25, 23, and 19 KDa, respectively (Figure 3b).

2.4. Antibacterial Activity Results

2.4.1. Histone Antimicrobial Activity

The bacteriostasis circle method was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of histone against Pseudomonas putida, Shewanella putrefaciens, and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. As shown in Figure 4a, histone showed a significant inhibition to the three bacteria and the inhibition improved with the increase of the concentration of histone. In addition, the antimicrobial effect of histone to Staphylococcus was observed to be the best, whereas when the concentration was 10 mg/mL, the inhibitory zone diameter (IZD) of Staphylococcus aureus, Shewanella putrefaciens, and Pseudomonas putida were 15.23, 14.43, and 10.4 mm, respectively (Figure 4a). When compared with protamine at the same concentration, the observed antimicrobial activity of histone to Staphylococcus aureus and Shewanella putrefaciens was almost the same of that of protamine (Figure 4b, 4c), although it was much lower than that of protamine against Pseudomonas (Figure 4d). Meanwhile, the OD method results showed that the optical density (OD) value of bacteria suspension with histone increased much slower (Figure 5a), while the bacteria suspension without histone increased rapidly (Figure 5b).

2.4.2. Antimicrobial Activity of Histone after Modification

The antimicrobial activity of histone products after hydrolysis by papain, trypsin, flavor protease, and alkaline protease was investigated. No antimicrobial activity was observed (Figure 6a–c), except that the products hydrolyzed by alkaline protease for 1 h showed slight antimicrobial activity against Shiva and Staphylococcus (Figure 6d).
The bacteriostasis of the histone products after pepsin hydrolysis at 1 h and 5 h is shown in Figure 6e. Compared with the other four enzymes, the enzymatic fragments of pepsin showed higher bacteriostasis and the fragments of pepsin hydrolyzed for 5 h revealed slightly better bacteriostasis than those of enzymatic hydrolyzed for 1 h, respectively. At the concentration of 10 mg/mL, the 5 h segment of pepsin enzymatic hydrolysis with an antibacterial ring diameter of about 19.03 mm for Shiva, 19.83 mm for Staphylococcus, and 16.4 mm for Pseudomonas putida (Figure 7), which was increased by 31.87%, 30.2%, and 57.7% compared with the diameters of the original histones, which were 14.43 mm, 15.23 mm, and 10.4 mm, respectively. Meanwhile, the OD method results showed that the OD value of bacterial suspension with histone after digestion by pepsin decreased rapidly (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

Past studies suggest that histone H1 is known to play a key role in fish immunity. Richards et al. (2001) extracted a 20.7 KDa antibacterial protein from Atlantic salmon liver, which was identified as histone H1 by tandem nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the protein against E. coli D31 was 31 µg/ml [11]. Patrzykat et al. (2001) reported the purification of an antimicrobial peptide (HSDF-1) from the mucus and serum of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, which was a 26-residue N-terminal fragment of histone H1, could inhibit the growth of A. salmonicida, V. anguillarum, or Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium [20]. On the basis of these results, in this study, histone was extracted from immature gonads of Atlantic salmon males that were discarded during commercial fishing operations, and the antibacterial activity was estimated.
In the storage of aquatic products, specific spoilage organisms (SSO) dominate the spoilage of food [21]. Shewanella putrefaciens and Pseudomonas putida are both common SSO in marine fish, which often appeared in salmon and turbot preserved at low temperatures [22,23]. In addition, Staphylococcus aureus, which was a common pathogen in aquatic products, was also selected as the test strain.
Using data analysis software, the peptide mass was extracted from the original documents in order to compare it with the UniProt data bank. The information extracted from the analysis software was uploaded into the MASCOT software, and various parameters such as enzymolysis, chemical modification, and corresponding database were set. On the basis of probability scoring, the software matches the actual detected peptide information with the information in the database and provides reasonable scores and coverage information. In this way, the extracted protein was finally determined as histone rather than protamine, where the observed molecular weight of histone was much bigger than that of protamine.
The enzymolysis method has been often applied in protein modifications, because some bioactive peptides may hide in some of their structures or sequences [24]. According to a previous report, it is possible to obtain peptide segments with high activity by using different enzymes to hydrolyze the proteins [25]. Furthermore, the preparation of antimicrobial peptides by enzymolysis is environmental friendly and easy to control, which is considered the most promising method for mass production of antimicrobial peptides [24]. Therefore, in our study, five common proteases were selected for enzymatic hydrolysis of the extracted histones. Compared with the original histone, the fragments obtained by the pepsin hydrolysate have higher antibacterial activity, which was increased by 31.87%, 30.2%, and 57.7%, while the molecular weight was 15% to 30% lower than that of the original histone. Some other studies have reported that histone proteins or their derivatives have some antibacterial activity, but because of the large molecular weight and functional regions unrelated to antibacterial activity, the complete histones may have some defects when used as intracellular antibacterial factors. Meanwhile, some of the antimicrobial peptides were generated by the degradation of some precursor proteins. Cho et al. (2002) reported that some histone-derived antimicrobial peptides with high similarity to histone amino sequences existed on the body surface and in vivo of fish were mainly derived from histone H1, H2A, and H2B [26]. Nam et al. found that the N-terminal of histone H1 exacted from the testis and ovaries of flouncy (Paralichthys olivaceus) was similar to the known antimicrobial peptides, which had strong antibacterial activity to both G+ and G bacteria [27]. The three fragments resultant from the pepsin digestion in this study might be histone-derived antimicrobial peptides, and we will isolate them and analyze their sequence and antimicrobial activity, respectively, in future research.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Fresh Atlantic salmon spermary was purchased from Shandong Oriental Ocean sci-tech Co., Ltd, China. Pepsin, trypsin, papain, flavoring protease, and alkaline protease were purchased from Solarbio (Beijing, China). Protamine was purchased from Sigma Company. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas putida, and Shewanella putrefaciens were obtained from the food safety laboratory of Ocean University of China. All other reagents used in the experiments were chemically pure.

4.2. Histone Extraction

One hundred grams of fresh raw Atlantic salmon fish sperm were homogenized for 1 min in 200 mL of NaCl solution (0.14 mol/L). Then, it was stirred in ice bath for 20 min and treated for 10 min, followed by centrifuging at 4000 r/min for 10 min at 4 °C, after which the precipitate was collected. The operation was repeated once and the final precipitation obtained was ribonucleoprotein (DNP). One gram of DNP was mixed in 4 ml 5%(v/v) sulfuric acid, followed by ultrasound extraction at 10 KHz for 20 min, and centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and mixed with triple volume of 95% cold ethanol, and then the final precipitate was collected as crude protein.
The crude protein sample was then dried by vacuum freeze-drying and dissolved in ultrapure water to a final concentration of 10 mg/mL. Later, the pH was adjusted to 6–7, and the solution was moved in dialysis bags and dialyzed in ultra-pure water for more than 24 h with an ultra-pure water replacement every 8 h of intervals. Processed samples were collected for SDS-PAGE and Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE electrophoresis.

4.3. Histone Identification

The histone on the SDS-PAGE gel was identified by LC-MS-MS. Firstly, the clear histone band on the SDS-PAGE gel was cut off and treated with water and decolorizing solution (50% acetonitrile, 25 mM NH4HCO3), respectively. After vacuuming the acetonitrile, 10 mM DTT was added and incubated in a 56 °C water bath for 1 h. Afterwards, the DTT was removed, 55 mM iodacetamide (C2H4INO, Iam) was added, and it was incubated in a dark room for 45 min. The colloidal particles were collected and removed Iam, 25 mM NH4HCO3 was added for cleaning, and decolorizing solution was added for further cleaning. Finally, enzyme storage solution at 1 μg/μL was diluted 15 times with 25 mM NH4HCO3 and added into the cleaned colloidal particles, followed by addition of 25 mM NH4HCO3 to soak the colloidal particles, and then digestion at 37 °C overnight. Then, 0.1% FA of final concentration was added to stop digestion, and 10 µL of the sample was drawn for detection with mass spectrometer MicrOTOF-QII (BrukerDaltonics). After detection, the mass spectrogram data was extracted for analysis. Data analysis software was used to mark the peaks, and Mascot search engine version 2.3.01 was then used to search the Uniprot database, respectively.

4.4. Histone Modification

Papain, pepsin, trypsin, flavor protease, and alkaline protease were chosen for enzymatic hydrolysis. The enzyme was added at a ratio of 1:30 (g/g protein) to the histone with a concentration of 10 mg/mL. The enzymatic reaction was carried out in a shaker at the optimum condition of the enzyme according to its specification. The products of enzymatic hydrolysis for 1 h and 5 h were selected, respectively. The enzymes were inactivated in boiling water bath for 3–5 min before further use for the bacteriostasis experiment and electrophoresis.

4.5. Determination of Bacteriostatic Activity

The bacteriostasis of the histone before and after modification was preliminarily verified by the bacteriostasis circle method and the optical density (OD) method. Pseudomonas putida, Shewanella putrefaciens, and Staphylococcus aureus were chosen as test strains. After culture for 12 h, 100 µL bacterial suspension was evenly coated on the sterilized medium by spreaders, and then the pre-sterilized filter paper disc was dipped in histone solution and placed on the plates, and then incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, the bacteriostatic circles were successfully observed. Protamine was used as the positive control and sterile water was used as the negative control. The OD value method was used to detect the change in the optical density curves to time by mixing 50 μL bacterial suspension with 50 μL histone solution and cultured for six hours.

5. Conclusions

In this study, histone was extracted from immature testis of Atlantic salmon by acid extraction, modified by proteinases, and its antibacterial activity before and after modification was investigated. The results showed that the extracted histone with a molecular weight of about 30 KDa showed broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Whereas, after modification with pepsin, histone was hydrolyzed into three smaller fragments, and the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Shewanella putrefaciens, and Pseudomonas putida was found to be increased by 31.87%, 30.2%, and 57.7%, respectively. All the results obtained in this study emphasize and conclude that histone could be used as a potential preservative in the preservation application of various seafood in the food industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.F. and H.L.; Experiments, B.F.; Analysis, B.F., H.L., N.M., and J.S.; Writing paper, B.F., J.S., and T.R.P.; Supervision, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by China Agriculture Research System (CARS-47).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Izadpanah, A.; Gallo R, L. Antimicrobial peptides. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 52, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hancock, R.E.; Scott, M.G. The role of antimicrobial peptides in animal defenses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8856–8861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yeaman, M.R.; Yount, N.Y. Unifying themes in host defence effector polypeptides. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Syed, H.; Tauseef, M.; Ahmad, Z. A connection between antimicrobial properties of venom peptides and microbial ATP synthase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 2002, 415, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scheicher, B.; Schachner-Nedherer, A.-L.; Zimmer, A. Protamine-oligonucleotide-nanoparticles: Recent advances in drug delivery and drug targeting. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 75, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, H.; Ye, J.; Liu, E.; Liang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Yang, V.C. Low molecular weight protamine (LMWP): A nontoxic protamine substitute and an effective cell-penetrating peptide. J. Control. Release 2014, 193, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Z.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, G. Facile and sensitive detection of protamine by enhanced room-temperature phosphorescence of Mn-doped ZnS quantum dots. Anal. Biochem. 2015, 478, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pugsley, M.K.; Kalra, V.; Froebel-Wilson, S. Protamine is a low molecular weight polycationic amine that produces actions on cardiac muscle. Life Sci. 2002, 72, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fritsche, A.; Schweitzer, M.A.; Hring, H. Glimepiride Combined with Morning Insulin Glargine, Bedtime Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin, or Bedtime Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003, 138, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Richards, R.C.; O’Neil, D.B.; Thibault, P.; Ewart, K.V. Histone H1: An antimicrobial protein of Atlantic salmon (Salmon salar). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 284, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Femandes, J.M.; Molle, G.; Kemp, G.D.; Smith, V. Isolation and characterisation of oncorhyncin II, a histone H1-derived antimicrobial peptide from skin secretions of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2004, 28, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bergsson, G.; Agerberth, B.; Jörnvall, H.; Gudmundsson, G.H. Isolation and identification of antimicrobial components from the epidermal mucus of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). FEBS J. 2005, 272, 4960–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Zoysa, M.; Nikapitiya, C.; Whang, I.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J. Abhisin: A potential antimicrobial peptide derived from histone H2A of disk abalone (Haliotis discus discus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2009, 27, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Zoysa, M.; Whang, I.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J. Defensin from disk abalone Haliotis discus discus: Molecular cloning, sequence characterization and immune response against bacterial infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010, 28, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eskandarian, H.A.; Impens, F.; Nahori, M.A.; Soubigou, G.; Coppée, J.Y.; Cossart, P.; Hamon, M.A. A Role for SIRT2-Dependent Histone H3K18 Deacetylation in Bacterial Infection. Science 2013, 341, 1238858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miller, B.F.; Abrams, R.; Dorfman, A.; Klein, M. Antibacterial properties of potamine and histone. Science 1942, 96, 428–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaňka, J. Gene expression and chromatin structure in the pre-implantation embryo. Theriogenology 2003, 59, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clarke, A.J.M. The Physical Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Herring Protamines. Master’s Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada, April 1998. [Google Scholar]
  20. Patrzykat, A.; Zhang, L.; Mendoza, V.; Iwama, G.K.; Hancock, R.E. Synergy of histone-derived peptides of coho salmon with lysozyme and flounder pleurocidin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1337–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dalgaard, P. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of spoilage bacteria from packed fish. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995, 26, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Indergård, E.; Tolstorebrov, I.; Larsen, H.; Eikevik, T.M. The influence of long-term storage, temperature and type of packaging materials on the quality characteristics of frozen farmed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Int. J. Refrig. 2014, 41, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gram, L.; Huss, H.H. Fresh and Processed Fish and Shellfish. In The Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food; Lund, B.M., Baird-Parker, T.C., Gould, G.W., Eds.; Aspen Publishers Inc.: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000; pp. 472–506. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bolscher, J.G.; van der Kraan, M.I.; Nazmi, K.; Kalay, H.; Grün, C.H.; van’t Hof, W.; Amerongen, A.V.N. A one-enzyme strategy to release an antimicrobial peptide from the LFampin-domain of bovine lactoferrin. Peptides (N.Y.) 2006, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tomita, M.; Bellamy, W.; Takase, M.; Yamauchi, K.; Wakabayashi, H.; Kawase, K. Potent Antibacterial Peptides Generated by Pepsin Digestion of Bovine Lactoferrin. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 4137–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cho, J.H.; Park, I.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, W.T.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, S.C. Cathepsin D produces antimicrobial peptide parasin I from histone H2A in the skin mucosa of fish. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 429–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nam, B.H.; Seo, J.K.; Go, H.J.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, Y.O.; Kim, D.G.; Park, N.G. Purification and characterization of an antimicrobial histone H1-like protein and its gene from the testes of olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The results of SDS-page electrophoresis and Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE. 1: Marker. 2: Commercial protamine. 3: Histone. (a) The SDS-page of histone; (b) the Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE of sigma’s commercial protamine and histone.
Figure 1. The results of SDS-page electrophoresis and Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE. 1: Marker. 2: Commercial protamine. 3: Histone. (a) The SDS-page of histone; (b) the Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE of sigma’s commercial protamine and histone.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g001
Figure 2. The result of Mascot search in Uniprot. It showed the highest score of protein in salmon histone.
Figure 2. The result of Mascot search in Uniprot. It showed the highest score of protein in salmon histone.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g002
Figure 3. The results of SDS-page electrophoresis of histone after enzymatic hydrolysis. 1: Marker. 2: Histone. 3: Histone treated by papain. 4: Histone treated by pepsin. 5: Histone treated by trypsin. 6: Histone treated by flavor protease. 7: Histone treated by alkaline protease. (a) The results of an hour’s hydrolysis of five enzymes; (b) the results of five hour’s hydrolysis of five enzymes.
Figure 3. The results of SDS-page electrophoresis of histone after enzymatic hydrolysis. 1: Marker. 2: Histone. 3: Histone treated by papain. 4: Histone treated by pepsin. 5: Histone treated by trypsin. 6: Histone treated by flavor protease. 7: Histone treated by alkaline protease. (a) The results of an hour’s hydrolysis of five enzymes; (b) the results of five hour’s hydrolysis of five enzymes.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g003
Figure 4. The inhibitory zone diameter (IZD) of histone and protamine against Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus as the concentration changes. (a) The IZD of histone against Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus; (b) the comparison of IZD of histone and protamine against Shewanella putrefaciens; (c) the comparison of IZD of histone and protamine against Staphylococcus aureus; (d) the comparison of IZD of histone and protamine against Pseudomonas putida.
Figure 4. The inhibitory zone diameter (IZD) of histone and protamine against Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus as the concentration changes. (a) The IZD of histone against Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus; (b) the comparison of IZD of histone and protamine against Shewanella putrefaciens; (c) the comparison of IZD of histone and protamine against Staphylococcus aureus; (d) the comparison of IZD of histone and protamine against Pseudomonas putida.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g004
Figure 5. The optical density (OD) value of histone and the blank control group changed with the trend of time. (a) The OD value of histone changed with the trend of time; (b) the OD value of the blank control group changed with the trend of time.
Figure 5. The optical density (OD) value of histone and the blank control group changed with the trend of time. (a) The OD value of histone changed with the trend of time; (b) the OD value of the blank control group changed with the trend of time.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g005
Figure 6. The results of the bacteriostasis activity test of the products of pepsinase hydrolyzed histone at 1 h and 5 h. (a) The results of papain enzymatic hydrolysis products; (b) the results of trypsin enzymatic hydrolysis products; (c) the results of flavourzyme enzymatic hydrolysis products; (d) the results of alcalase enzymatic hydrolysis products; (e) the results of pepsin enzymatic hydrolysis products.
Figure 6. The results of the bacteriostasis activity test of the products of pepsinase hydrolyzed histone at 1 h and 5 h. (a) The results of papain enzymatic hydrolysis products; (b) the results of trypsin enzymatic hydrolysis products; (c) the results of flavourzyme enzymatic hydrolysis products; (d) the results of alcalase enzymatic hydrolysis products; (e) the results of pepsin enzymatic hydrolysis products.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g006
Figure 7. The IZD of pepsin enzymolysis fragment and histone and protamine against Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus at a concentration of 10 mg/mL.
Figure 7. The IZD of pepsin enzymolysis fragment and histone and protamine against Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus at a concentration of 10 mg/mL.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g007
Figure 8. The OD value of the pepsin enzymolysis fragment changed with the trend of time.
Figure 8. The OD value of the pepsin enzymolysis fragment changed with the trend of time.
Marinedrugs 18 00133 g008
Table 1. The search conditions and parameters of histone.
Table 1. The search conditions and parameters of histone.
Parameter OptionsParameter Determination
Type of searchMS/MS Ion Search
EnzymeTrypsin
Fixed modificationsCarboxymethyl (C)
Variable modificationsGln- Epyro-Glu (N-term Q), Oxidation (M)
Mass valuesMono isotopic
Protein massUnrestricted
Peptide mass tolerance−/+ 15 ppm
Fragment mass tolerance−/+ 20 mmu
Max missed cleavages1
Instrument typeDefault
Number of queries10,497
Databaseuniprot20180305 (556,825 sequences; 199,652,254 residues)
TaxonomyMetazoa (Animals) (101,714 sequences)
Table 2. The partial comparison results in the Uniprot database.
Table 2. The partial comparison results in the Uniprot database.
AccessionDescriptionMassScoreMatchesSequencesCoverage
P06350Histone H1 OS = Oncorhynchus mykiss OX = 8022 PE = 1 SV = 220791126884(52)12(12)38%
P04264Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 1 OS = Homo sapiens OX = 9606 GN = KRT1 PE = 1 SV = 66617372236(23)17(15)25%
P13645Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 10 OS = Homo sapiens OX = 9606 GN = KRT10 PE = 1 SV = 65902436627(13)17(10)24%
P35908Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 2 epidermal OS = Homo sapiens OX = 9606 GN = KRT2 PE = 1 SV = 26568332920(12)14(10)23%
P35527Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 9 OS = Homo sapiens OX = 9606 GN = KRT9 PE = 1 SV = 36225915915(7)10(7)17%
P42212Green fluorescent protein OS = Aequorea victoria OX = 6100 GN = GFP PE = 1 SV = 12698514311(6)6(3)27%
P02754Beta-lactoglobulin OS = Bos taurus OX=9913 GN = LGB PE = 1 SV = 3202761226(4)4(3)17%
P02533Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 14 OS = Homo sapiens OX = 9606 GN = KRT14 PE = 1 SV = 4518771198(4)7(4)16%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, B.; Lin, H.; Ramesh Pavase, T.; Mi, N.; Sui, J. Extraction, Identification, Modification, and Antibacterial Activity of Histone from Immature Testis of Atlantic salmon. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18030133

AMA Style

Fu B, Lin H, Ramesh Pavase T, Mi N, Sui J. Extraction, Identification, Modification, and Antibacterial Activity of Histone from Immature Testis of Atlantic salmon. Marine Drugs. 2020; 18(3):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18030133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Boyu, Hong Lin, Tushar Ramesh Pavase, Nasha Mi, and Jianxin Sui. 2020. "Extraction, Identification, Modification, and Antibacterial Activity of Histone from Immature Testis of Atlantic salmon" Marine Drugs 18, no. 3: 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18030133

APA Style

Fu, B., Lin, H., Ramesh Pavase, T., Mi, N., & Sui, J. (2020). Extraction, Identification, Modification, and Antibacterial Activity of Histone from Immature Testis of Atlantic salmon. Marine Drugs, 18(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18030133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop