Next Article in Journal
Effect of Equal Channel Angular Pressing on the Dynamic Softening Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy in the Hot Deformation Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Corrosion Protective Film Formation on Mg Alloy AZ31 by Exposure to Dilute Selenite Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis of Shear and Particle Crushing Characteristics in Ring Shear System Using the PFC2D
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Different Surface Native Pre-Oxides on the Hot Corrosion Properties of Nickel-Based Single Crystal Superalloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of ZnO Oxide Layer on the Physicochemical Behavior of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy

1
Department of Materials Engineering and Biomaterials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
Department of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40 Street, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
3
Department of Inorganic, Analytical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, B. Krzywoustego 6 Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(1), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010230
Submission received: 1 December 2020 / Revised: 26 December 2020 / Accepted: 28 December 2020 / Published: 5 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corrosion Resistance of Alloy and Coating Materials)

Abstract

:
Titanium and its alloys are characterized by high biocompatibility and good corrosion resistance as a result of the ability to form a TiO2 oxide layer. However, based on literature data it can be concluded that titanium degradation products, in the form of titanium particles, metal-protein groups, oxides and ions, may cause allergic, inflammatory reactions and bone resorption. The corrosion process of Ti6Al4V in the human body environment may be intensified by a decreased pH and concentration of chloride compounds. The purpose of this article was to analyze the corrosion resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy, obtained by the selective laser melting method in a corrosion solution of neutral pH and in a solution simulating peri-implant inflammatory conditions. Additionally, the influence of zinc oxide deposited by the atomic layer deposition method on the improvement of the physicochemical behavior of the Ti6Al4V alloy was analyzed. In order to characterize the ZnO layer, tests of chemical and phase composition as well as surface morphology investigation were performed. As part of the assessment of the physicochemical properties of the uncoated samples and those with the ZnO layer, tests of wetting angle, pitting corrosion and impedance corrosion were carried out. The number of ions released after the potentiodynamic test were measured using the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) method. It can be concluded that samples after surface modification (with the ZnO layer) were characterized by favorable physicochemical properties and had higher corrosion resistance.

1. Introduction

Generally, titanium and its alloys haves been regarded as inert and biocompatible materials, which are ideal for long-lasting implantation in medical applications [1,2,3,4]. Good corrosion resistance is associated with the ability to spontaneously form a thin and stable protective oxide layer, which constitute a compact and dense kinetic barrier for extensive corrosion [5,6,7]. However, mechanical stress results in depassivation, bare metal exposure, repassivation and corrosion [8,9,10]. In vivo corrosion and tribological wear of titanium materials can, therefore, lead to the release of particles in the form of TiO2, inorganic metallic salts, as well as free metal ions to the intraarticular joint space. Unfortunately, and contrary to popular belief, released titanium degradation products may cause serious side effects such as inflammation, pain [11], cytotoxicity [12,13], allergy [14], genotoxicity [15], carcinogenicity [16]. Additionally, titanium dioxide TiO2 can alter the viability and behavior of multiple bone cells, which may result in bone resorption, aseptic implant loosening and disrupt implant retention [17,18]. On this basis, it can be concluded that the chemical and physical properties of the surface of the medical device are responsible for the proper integration of the implant with the environment of the human body. In recent years, the use of inorganic oxide layers in biomedical application has attracted interest due to their high chemical stability, satisfactory biocompatibility and possible high antibacterial potential. The most popular metal oxide layers are: silver Ag2O [19], copper oxide CuO [20], gold Au2O3 [21], titanium oxide TiO2 [22], aluminum oxide Al2O3 [23], zirconia oxide ZrO2 [24]. Currently, there are some reports on the antibacterial activity and corrosion protection of ZnO [25]. Mao et al. [26] pointed to the effect of zinc ions on enhancing antibacterial activities and stimulating the immune function of the human body. Based on the results obtained by Foroutan [27], it can be concluded that the ZnO nanoparticles stimulated the process of differentiation of MSCs (mensenchymal stem cells), which depended on the dose as well as on the size of ZnO. According to the studies performed by Bowen et al. [28], it can be concluded that the Zn2+ ions released from a zinc implant may suppress restenosis pathways and exhibit excellent biocompatibility with the arterial tissue, which was also confirmed by Yang et al. [29].
In many literature reports the effect of surface conditions on the physicochemical properties, especially corrosion resistance of Ti-based alloys, has been investigated, but in many cases the corrosion tests were performed in a neutral solution of pH = 7–8 [30,31]. However, interference with the human body environment disturbs its existing state of balance and thus triggers defense reactions, such as decreased pH of body solution and increased temperature. In some reports, in order to simulate relevant clinical scenarios, the pH of the solution was decreased by the addition of fluoride ions [32,33]. However, there is no clear information about the influence of chloride ions on the corrosive behavior of titanium alloys. Oshida et al. [34] suggested that implantological success depends to a large extent on pH values and the concentration of oxygen or chloride compounds. The corrosion of the metal implant can also be accelerated by the adhesion of bacteria [35]. Therefore, the authors of this work proposed a modification of the Ti6Al4V alloy surface by deposition of a ZnO layer by the atomic layer deposition (ALD) method. The ALD method allows deposition of extremely conformal and high-quality barrier layers with controllable thickness, even on complex three-dimensional surfaces. The bone implants are often characterized by very complex shapes, in many cases obtained by selective laser melting (SLM) methods, which does not appear to be a limitation from the designer’s point view [36,37]. The aim of this study is to understand the mechanism underpinning the effect of Ringer’s solution pH on the corrosion of the Ti6Al4V alloy and eventually the protective action of the ZnO oxide layer. The quality of the ZnO layer was investigated by microscopic observations, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) as well as phase investigation by X-Ray Diffraction method. In order to reflect possible changes in degradation of the uncoated metal surface and the surface with ZnO layer, the potentiodynamic tests were performed. Additionally, to test processes and phenomena occurring at the interface between the implant and the tissue environment (in order to characterize the metal/oxide/solution interface), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed. The results of the research were supplemented with the analysis of the amount of ionized ions released to the corrosive solution using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AEM) method. Wetting angle measurements and surface free energy (SFE) calculations were performed to obtain the information about the chemical character of the surface, which are important factors that could affect cellular response and bacterial plaque accumulation. The selection of the investigated aspects is related to the functioning of the implants.

2. Materials and Methods

The subject of the study was the Ti6Al4V titanium alloy, manufactured by SLM. The chemical composition delivered and used in the experiments met the requirements of ISO 5832-3 [38] and ASTM F-136-13 [39] standards and is shown in Table 1.
It was found that the chemical composition of the Ti6Al4V powder and as-fabricated samples were almost the same as the declared requirements. A similar elements content within the powder and as-fabricated specimens designated that the alloying elements evaporation during laser interaction with powder material during the SLM process was negligible. The Ti6Al4V powder was spherical in shape (Figure 1a).
The powder particle size was in the range of 19–65 µm (Figure 1b), as measured using a laser particle size analyzer Analysette 22 MicroTec PLUS (Fritsch, Sonneberg, German). The median diameter D50 was 35.86 µm, and D10–D90 diameter range was 19.12–60.75 µm. The shape of the particle size distribution scheme was relatively narrow and symmetric. The Ti6Al4V cube with dimensions of 10 × 10 × 10 mm was built using a laser-based SLM machine AM250 (Reinshaw, New Mills, UK), which is employs a Ytterbium fiber laser (Yb) with a wavelength of λ = 1074 nm (laser power P—400 W, scanning speed SP—up to 2000 mm/s). The tested samples were manufactured using the laser power of 400 W and laser speed of 500 mm/s within the protective atmosphere of high purity argon (99.996%). The tested samples were manufactured using a meander scanning strategy, and the direction of scanning was rotated through 67° between successive layers. In order to guarantee good adhesion of the powder material to the base platform, before the start of the process the plate was subjected to polishing. Process parameters were designed with MARCAM AutoFab software (PresseBox, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). Final tested samples were subjected to heat treatment at T = 800 °C for t = 6 h.
After processing, the tested samples were subjected to mechanical finishing, using the grinding-polishing machine TERGAMIN-30 (Struers, Willich, Germany). The samples were ground with SiC abrasive papers of 4000 and 2400 grain/mm2 and polished, which was performed using a colloidal silica suspension OP-U 0.04 µm. Next, the samples were thoroughly cleaned in acetone and then dried. After mechanical finishing the samples were in the initial state (M1) for the tests. The zinc oxide layer ZnO has been deposited by an ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition) method, using an advanced ALD system R-200 (Picosun, Masalantie, Finland). Diethylzinc (DEZ) was used as a precursor for zinc, and deionized water as a precursor for the oxide. Nitrogen was used as an inert gas. The dosing time for each of the precursors was 0.1 s. The flushing time was 4 s for DEZ and 5 s for deionized water. During the ALD process, the chemical reaction was thermally assisted and the temperature was set at 150 °C, which is located in the so-called “growth window”. The number of cycles was 1500. The thickness of the layer was approximately ~200 ± 20 nm. The samples after the ALD process were the second group M2 for the tests.
The surface observation of the tested samples was performed using the scanning electron microscope Supra 35 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), equipped with type InLess detector. The microscopic observations were conducted at 70,000 magnification with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
The surface morphology and topography were examined using AFM XE—100 atomic force microscopy (Park System, Suwon, Korea). The observation was conducted by the contact mode, and the scan area was 10 × 10 µm2.
The phase constituents of samples with the ZnO layer were examined by the X-ray diffraction method, using X’Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer (Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) using Co Kα radiation with 2θ ranging from 20° to 90° with a step of 0.05. The lamp was set to 40 kV and the heater current of 30 mA was used. To identify the ZnO phase components, a thin layer of zinc oxide was applied to a SiC substrate to remove interference from the substrate material.
The EIS test consists in determining the response of the tested electrical system at a determined free potential and current pulse [40]. An electrochemical examination was performed using the test stand comprised of an AutoLab’s PGSTAT 302N system (AutoLab, Warsaw, Poland), equipped with the frequency response analyzer (FRA2) module and an electrochemical cell with a three-electrode system, where the tested sample was used as a working electrode (anode), an auxiliary electrode was represented by a platinum wire (PtP-201), and the reference electrode was a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode. The tests were performed within a 104–10−3 Hz frequency range, and the voltage amplitude of the sinusoidal signal activating amounted to 10 mV. In the test, impedance spectra of the system were determined and the measurement data were compared against the equivalent system. The impedance spectra of the studies are presented in the form of Nyquist diagrams for different frequency values and Bode diagrams. The obtained measurement data were adjusted through the method of the smallest squares to the substitute setup and the values of resistance R and capacity C were determined.
The potentiodynamic test by recording anodic polarization curves, according to PN-EN ISO 10993-15 [41] standard was performed. The measurements were taken with the use of Atlas 0531 EU potentiostat (ATLAS-SOLLICH, Rębiechowo Poland) with a PC with the AtlasLab software and three electrode system, identical to that used in the EIS test. At first, the open circuit potential (OCP) was established at electrolysis conditions, after which the potentiodynamic polarization curves-from the value of the initial potential Einit determined according to the formula Einit = Ecop − 100 mV. The polarization rate was equal to 1 mV/s and the potential change was in the direction of the anode and once the maximum measuring range reached + 4000 mV, the polarization direction was changed. Based on the study, the following parameters were determined: the corrosion resistance Ecorr [mV], transpassivation potential Etr [mV], breakdown potential Eb [mV], repassivation potential Ecp [mV]. The value of polarization resistance Rp and Tafels components ba and bc [mV] were determined with the use of the Tafel method and corrosion current density was calculated using the formula icorr = 0.026/Rp.
All of the electrochemical tests were performed in 250 mL of Ringer’s solution (NaCl—8.6 g/cm3, KCl—0.3 g/cm3, CaCl2 × 2H2O—0.33 g/cm3) at 37 ± 1 °C and pH 7.4. Subsequently, to simulate inflammation, the pH of the solution was adjusted by controlled injection of a 1M HCl solution until the critical value was pH 5. The electrolyte temperature was kept constant using a Julabo F12-MA cooling/heating circulator (Cole-Parmer, Veron Hills, UK).
The content of aluminum, vanadium and titanium for the M1 samples’ group and additionally Zn for the M2 samples’ group in saline Ringer solutions were determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer Varian 710-ES. The system is equipped with a OneNeb nebulizer and twister glass spray chamber. The parameters of the analysis were as follows: RF power 1.0 kW, plasma flow 15 L/min, auxiliary flow 1.5 L/min, nebulizer pressure 210 kPa, pump rate 15 rpm, emission lines of Al: λ = 237.312 and 396.152 nm, V: λ = 268.796, 292.401, 309.310 and 311.837 nm, Ti: λ = 334.188, 334.941, and 336.122 nm. The calibration curve method was applied, and the standards were prepared using the matrix (Ringer solution) and single element standard solutions of 1 mg/mL (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized water was obtained using a Millipore Elix 10 system. The results were calculated as an average value of concentrations obtained for all used analytical lines with standard deviation not exceeding 1.7%.
The microscopic observation of the surface of the tested samples after potentiodynamic tests was carried out using a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), equipment with SE (secondary electron) detector. Additionally, the microchemical composition analysis was carried out using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) with the point-by-point method.
To determine the surface wettability and contact angles θ analysis measurements, the sessile drop method was performed on both sample groups. The measurements were performed using a test stand, incorporating a Surftens Universal Goniometer (OEG, Frankfurt, Germany) and a PC with Surface 4.5 software. Two measure liquids–distilled water (POCH S.A., Gliwice, Poland) and diiodonomethane (Merck, Warsow, Poland) were used. The wettability angle measurements were carried out using drops of liquid with a volume 1.5 µL at temperature T = 23 ± 1 °C (289 K) placed on the surface of the samples. For both tested sample groups five measurements using both measurement liquids were performed, and the average value was determined. The values of SFE were calculated based on the recorded contact angle. The values of SFE and their components are given in Table 2.
For all physicochemical and electrochemical tests, five samples of botch groups (initial state and with ZnO layer) were undertaken.

3. Results

Based on the microscopic observation (Figure 2a) it ca be concluded, that the ZnO layer deposited by the ALD method was conformal, homogeneous and defect-free (no discontinuities, cracks, pores were detected). The microanalysis of the chemical composition of EDS showed the presence of only zinc Zn and oxygen O.
The columnar growth and columnar orientation of grains were observed, which is typical for ZnO grown by the ALD method [42]. The grains had an elongated shape and were disordered without a dominant direction. The registered XRD pattern had a major diffraction peak of ZnO at an angle (2θ) of 32.1° along (100) plane and other diffraction lines of lower intensity attributed to (002), (101), (102), (103), (112), (2200), (112) and (102) planes of the hexagonal wurtzite ZnO, respectively. Similar results were obtained by Feng at all. [43] and Staszuk at all. [40].
On the basis of AFM scans (Figure 3) it can be concluded, that the samples with a ZnO layer (M2) were characterized by higher surface roughness in nanoscale, as compared to the samples in the initial state (M1).
The mean value of Ra parameter for uncoated samples (M1) was Ra = 21 nm and for the samples with ZnO layer Ra = 62 nm. Additionally, the average distance between the highest peaks analyzed for samples with the ZnO layer assumed similar values.
On the Figure 4 was presented the OCP values changes in time function.
In the neutral Ringer solution of pH = 7.4, the OPC values of samples in the initial state (M1), positively shift direction over all measuring time without noticeable stabilization. The OCP potential of the M1 sample group, tested in Ringer solution of pH = 5 presents almost no change over time. For samples in the initial state M1, the OCP was higher in the solution containing chloride ions (−200 mVSCE) compared to that in Ringer solution alone, (−350 mVSCE) which is likely to be due to an increased cathodic current. The OCP values close to −350 mVSCE and −200 mVSCE (corresponding to approximately −81 mVNEH and +44 mVNEH,, respectively) of the Ti6Al4V alloy for both tests’ conditions, belongs to domains of the passive region of TiO2 in the Pourbaix diagram (Figure 5a) indicating the fact that under steady-state conditions, the alloys form a stable oxide layer of TiO2 [44,45].
For the samples with the ZnO layer, regardless of the pH of Ringer’s solution, the OCP potential gradually increased. It was associated with a thickening of the oxide film and/or corrosion products layer on the samples. Additionally, the OCP values of that same pH of Ringer solution were higher for the samples with the ZnO layer as compared to the samples in the initial state. In the Ringer solution of pH = 7.4, the OCP potential of the M2 sample group presents some oscillations. This can be related to some instability of ZnO oxide films in test conditions.
The mean value of OCP was close to −109 mVSCE (+135 mVNEH), which is more noble, compared to the M2 samples, tested in Ringer solution with the addition of chloride ions, where the mean value was −223 mVSCE (+21 mVNEH). According to the Pourbaix diagram (Figure 5b), zinc is present as hydrated Zn2+(aq), over both ranges of the pH values of Ringer’s solution, and the OCP values belong to biological standard reduction potentials (~820 mV to ~−670 mV) [46,47]. The area of zinc passivation (the field of solid corrosion products) occurs for a narrow range of pH values from 9 to 11. However, the domains of the passive zinc region can be expanded to pH 6–11 by the adsorption of carbon to the zinc surface [48].
The results of the potentiodynamic test in form of anodic polarization curves, which can be used to confirm the interpretation of OCP behavior, are presented in Figure 6 and the pitting corrosion parameters are given in Table 3.
For M1 for both variants of the Ringer’s solution pH, higher values of the bc (bc = 67 ± 7, pH—7.4 and bc = 69 ± 8, pH = 5) were obtained compared to ba (ba = 54 ± 6, pH—7.4 and ba = 69 ± 8, pH = 5). A reverse tendency has been reported for the samples with the ZnO layer. Higher values of anodic reaction (ba = 256 ± 14 mV, pH—7.4 and ba = 207 ± 19 mV, pH = 5) as compared to the cathodic reaction were recorded (bc = 88 ± 9 mV, pH—7.4 and pH = 5). On the basis of the recorded curves it was established that the corrosion resistance was different depending on the surface condition and Ringer’s solution pH. Only for the samples in initial state M1, tested in neutral Ringer solution of pH = 7.4, the was the existence of transpassivation potential Etr measured. The mean value was approximately Etr = 2410 ± 120 mV. When the pH of the corrosion solution was decreased to 5.0, the hysteresis loops were recorded and the existence of the breakthrough potential Eb and the repassivation potential Ecp was recorded, of which the mean values were Eb = 1800 ± 89 mV and Ecp = 827 ± 74, respectively. For both test conditions, the voltammetric curve of samples in the initial state (M1) shows an active to passive transition with current densities of about −350 µA/cm2 and a similar plateau from ~+10 to + 2000 mV followed by a steady increase. A similar character of the progress of anodic polarization curves was recorded for the samples after surface modification. However, depositing the ZnO layer (M2) by the ALD method, regardless of the solution pH, a positive increase in the values of breakdown potential compared to values of transpassivation potential of samples in initial state (M1) was found, which favorably affects the corrosion resistance. In the case of samples with the ZnO layer, recorded curves were characterized by an active to passive transition with current densities of about −400 µA/cm2 without an explicit area of plateau. For the M2 sample group, the chloride ions have a negative influence on the electrochemical parameters due to their higher corrosivity. The mean values of breakdown potentials were Eb = 2958 ± 78 mV (pH = 7.4) and Eb = 2600 ± 102 mV (pH = 5). Additionally, with the deposited ZnO layer, the polarization resistance also increased from 469 ± 87 kΩ∙cm2 (pH = 7.4) and 568 ± 111 kΩ∙cm2 (pH = 5) for the uncovered samples to a value of 10973 ± 212 kΩ∙cm2 (pH = 7.4) and 1563 ± 87 kΩ∙cm2 (pH = 5) for samples with ZnO layer. A similar tendency for 316 stainless steel was obtained by Basiaga et al. [49].
EIS studies were performed to obtain an understanding of the influence of the surface modification and electrochemical test conditions on the corrosion mechanism of the Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. Figure 7 shows the EIS spectra recorded for both sample groups in the form of Nyquist and Bode plots.
The Nyquist diagram for both sample groups, tested in Ringer’s solution alone and with chloride ions, presented fragments of semi-circles, which is a typical response of a thin layer (Figure 7a,c,e,g). The presented semi-circles were deformed to a different degree, which were obtained also in previous tests [50]. The samples with the ZnO layer (M2), regardless of the pH value of Ringer solution, were characterized by the biggest angle of inclination of the curves to the ordinate axis, which pointed to better corrosion behavior compared to uncoated samples (M1). Increasing radius of semi-circles, presented on Nyquist plots, pointed to increased impedance values with the ZnO layer deposition. The lowest value of the maximum value of phase displacement at a broad range of frequencies, which are presented in the Bode diagram, was obtained for samples in the initial state (M1), tested in a neutral Ringer solution and the mean value was approximately Θ = 45°. For other samples the values were similar and were in the range of Θ = 70–80°. The lower of the wide range of high phase shift angles should be associated with instability of their oxide films, which correspond to the analysis of OCP diagrams (Figure 4). For all sample variants, the inclinations log|Z| at the whole scope of frequency changes is close to −1, which indicates the capacity character of the porous layer.
For the samples in initial state (M1), tested in neutral Ringer solution pH = 7.4 and with chloride ions, pH = 5, an equivalent circuit with two time constants was used to analyse the EIS data, which indicates the occurrence of two sublayers. A similar equivalent circuit was noted for samples with a ZnO layer (M2), tested in a solution of pH = 5. The equivalent circuit (Figure 8a,c) consists of Cpore/CPEpore (capacity of the double layer-porous surface) and Rpore (resistance of double layer-porous surface), which are representatives of the electrical porous layer, whereas CPEdl and Rct, represent the resistive and non-ideal capacitive behavior of the passive film.
According to this model, the two R, CPE/C elements are connected in series with the Ringer solution resistance Rs. The model describes the formation of two loops in a Nyquist plot. The activity of the oxide layer/deposited ZnO layer is characterized by a high-frequency loop, which diameter depends on the potential. This is determined by the serial resistance Rpore (electrolyte resistance in the porous phase) and the space charge capacitance Cpore/CPEpore (capacity of the double layer-porous surface). The low-frequency loop corresponds to the surface boundary of the oxide layer solution, and the Rct (characterizes the electric charge transfer resistance at the boundary of phases) and CPEdl is used to describe the low-frequency region (11–0.001 Hz) [51]. The mathematical impedance model of the above system is also presented in the Equation (1) for M1 samples group and in Equation (3) for M2 samples group (pH = 5). Impedance spectra (Figure 7) obtained for the samples with the ZnO layer, tested in neutral Ringer solution pH = 7.4, were interpreted by comparison to the model, where the passive film is considered to have a porous structure and to show non-ideal capacitive behavior (Figure 8b). Rad is the charge transfer resistance of the electrochemical process taking place inside the pore, and Cad/CPEad are the capacity of the adsorption layer. The mathematical impedance model of the above system is also presented in Equation (2).
  Z = R s + 1 1 R p +   Y 01 ( j ω ) n 1 +   1 1 R ct +   Y 02 ( j ) n 2  
Z = R s + 1 1 R pore +   Y 1 ( j ) n 1 +   1 1 R c t +   Y 2 ( j ) n 2
Z = R s + 1 1 R ad +   j C a d + 1 1 R pore +   j C p o r e +   1 1 R c t +   Y 2 ( j ) n 2
The numerical values of the electrical model of equivalent circuit for the investigated materials are summarized in Table 4.
The highest value of Rct resistance was obtained by samples with the ZnO layer, which confirmed to that the applied protective layers on the material contributed to the improvement of anticorrosive properties. The values obtained for the M1 sample group, for both test conditions were similar and were in the range from 393 kΩ cm2 (pH = 7.4) to 449 kΩ cm2 (pH = 5). Based on this, it can be concluded that the ZnO layer was characterized by good quality and compact structure.
In order to obtain more information about corrosion characteristics of both tested sample groups, after the potentiodynamic and electrochemical tests the samples were subjected to microscopic observation using the scanning electron microscope. Examples of results for samples with the ZnO layer are presented in Figure 9.
For all experimental groups, the amorphous sponge-like corrosion products cover most of the surface (Figure 9a). Additionally, on the surface of the samples, corrosion products are also visible in the form of a small amount of laminar crystals (Figure 9c and Figure 10).
The EDS results show that the primary elements of the sponge-like products were Zn and O (Figure 9b), while the primary elements of laminar crystals had the same chemical species but with addition of Cl ions (Figure 9d).
According to the results obtained by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (Table 5), it can be concluded that the ZnO layer is a good protection against the release of Ti6Al4V alloy element ions into the corrosive environment (human organism).
The analysis of the amount of ions released into the neutral Ringer’s solution for M1 sample groups, indicates a trace presence of elements. However, reducing the pH of the solution to the critical measurement increases the amount of titanium ions released into the solution. The deposition of the ZnO oxide layer by the ALD method inhibits the release of Ti6Al4V alloy elements tested both in Ringer’s solution and at pH = 7.4 and pH = 5, while releasing zinc ions. The process is intensified by reducing the pH of the corrosion solution.
The result of the measurements of the surface wettability and calculation of surface free energy are presented in Table 6 and the examples of drops placed on the surface of both sample groups and the scheme of the change of the contact angle in time function are presented in Figure 11.
Based on the results obtained, it was found that there is an influence of the zinc oxide layer ZnO deposition on the surface of the Ti6Al4V alloy for the wetting angle compared to the samples in the initial state. There were significant differences in the values of the wetting angle for M1 and M2 sample groups. For the samples in the initial state M1, the mean value of the water wetting angle was approximately θ = 63 ± 3°, which pointed to hydrophilic character of the surface. The surface modification by the ALD method affected the increase in wetting angle. For the samples with the ZnO layer M2 the angle value was θ = 110 ± 2°. The value of contact angle of more than 90° indicates the hydrophobic character of the surface. The scheme of contact angle changes in time function, showed an insignificant decrease in the value of the contact angle during the t = 60 s measurement. Additionally, the obtained values of contact angle, using diiodonomethane as a measure liquid, were similar for both sample groups and were in the range from θ = 45 ± 2° for M1 and θ = 54 ± 2° for M2, respectively. Furthermore, the values of surface free energy were similar to γS = 43–42 mJ/m2. For both sample groups, higher values of apolar components of SFE were observed, as compared to the polar components. Based on this it can be concluded that all tested samples exhibited a greater affinity to apolar groups of SFE than to polar ones. However, in case of the samples with the ZnO layer (M2) the differences in the values between polar and apolar components were bigger.

4. Discussion

First, the surface quality of the ZnO layer deposited by the ALD method was examined. On the basis of the results obtained it can be concluded that a chemically homogeneous defects-free layer was obtained. Additionally, it was found, that the modification led to the development of nanoscale surface of Ti6Al4V alloy (Figure 3).
Different corrosion resistance values were obtained for the uncoated samples (M1) and samples with the ZnO layer (M2). Additionally, it was found that the pH of Ringer’s solution had a significant influence on the corrosion parameters. Generally, it is known that the electrode potential in a metal-electrolyte system reflects the state of the surface of the metal that is immersed in the corrosive medium. Based on the results obtained from the open-circuit potential OCP measurements (Figure 4), it was recorded that for the samples in initial state (M1), tested in Ringer’s solution with the addition of chloride ions (pH = 5) the more noble values were obtained, compared to the samples tested in the neutral Ringer solution (pH = 7.4). The reverse tendency has been reported for the samples with the ZnO layer. Additionally, for the samples with the ZnO layer, regardless of test conditions, more positive values of OCP were recorded. According to the results obtained by Dai et al. [51] and Bhola et al. [44], it can be concluded that, the OCP shift in the more noble direction suggests the formation of a passive layer, which is a barrier for titanium alloys dissolution and reduces the corrosion rate. The shift for samples with the ZnO layer (M2) can be associated with thickening of the oxide film and/or corrosion product layer on the samples surface. The open-circuit potential increase shows that the tested samples become thermodynamically more stable with time.
The results of the potentiodynamic test confirm the interpretation of OCP behavior. The order of the OCP (Figure 6) is consistent with that in Figure 4, and a similar tendency was obtained by Zhang et al. [52]. More positive values of OCP were recorded (for both test conditions) for the samples with the ZnO layer (M2), which led to a higher potential associated with a higher anodic reaction rate. This is confirmed by the values obtained using the Tafel method (Table 3). Based on the results obtained by Blackwood et al. [53], it can be concluded that decreasing corrosion rate in effect of shift values of OCP to positive regions is associated with reducing the driving force of the cathodic reaction and increasing the thickness of the passive layers. Based on the results obtained from potentiodynamic tests, for samples after surface modification a favorable increase in corrosion resistance was observed (Table 4, Figure 6). The samples with ZnO Layer were characterized by higher values of corrosion potential and transpassivation/breakdown potentials and polarization resistance. According to the results obtained by the EIS method, it can be conceded that the deposition of the ZnO layer on the Ti6Al4V led to high electrochemical stability of the oxide layer as evidenced by the relatively high value of the charge transfer resistance Rct. Corrosion of zinc involves the anodic dissolution of zinc, according to Equation (4):
Z n     Z n 2 + ( a q ) + + e
For the M2 sample group, the microscopic investigations revealed the presence of the corrosion products in form of the amorphous sponge-like products (Figure 9a) and a certain amount of laminar crystals (Figure 9c). According to the results obtained by Yin et al. [54], it can be concluded that the sponge-like products are mainly comprised of Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6 and the laminar crystals should be consisting of Zn5(OH)8Cl2·H2O (Figure 11). The OCP potential of M2 samples group, tested in neutral Ringer solution presents some oscillations. The shape of the OCP curve can be related to some instability of ZnO layer. The instability of the oxide layer may be caused by its active dissolution and the simultaneous processes of its reconstruction. This proves only partial dissolution of zinc oxide in Ringer’s solution and deposition of corrosion products on the surface of the tested sample, which constitutes anti-corrosion protection, which confirms the highest value of OCP in the studied group.
Additionally, the obtained forms of the characteristics of EIS spectra indicate the presence of a porous oxide layer. In the case of these samples, lower values of the maximum value of phase displacement at a broad range of frequencies Θ = 45° were recorded, which also pointed to instability of their oxide films, which corresponds to the analysis of OCP diagrams (Figure 5). Based on the results obtained by Basiaga et al. [55] it can be concluded that this is due to the reaction at the layer–solution interface.
Additionally, Thomas et al. [56] showed that the reduction in the rate of zinc corrosion is caused by a reduced rate of the cathode reaction. Additionally, surface oxides are an effective anti-corrosion barrier. On this basis, it can be concluded that metallic zinc in physiological environments with a pH of 7.4 will dissolve over time, which may explain the presence of numerous corrosion products on the surface of M2 samples. Results of ICP–AES analysis pointed to increase number of Zn ions in Ringer solution after corrosion tests, which was intensified by reducing the pH of the corrosive solution. The Zn2+ released from the ZnO layer to the surrounding extracellular space may be biointegrated with human tissue or encapsulated in a dense fibrous tissue that may lead to inflammatory. The cellular response to the Zn2+ have significant impart the healing process and biocompatibility of zinc oxide layer [57]. However, results obtained by atomic emission spectrometry showed that the ZnO layer is a good protection against the release of Ti6Al4V alloy element ions into the corrosive environment (human organism). For the uncoated samples (M1), tested in Ringer solution of pH = 5, an increased number of released Ti ions can be observed.
The surface modification by ZnO layer deposition by ALD methods leads to the improvement of the corrosion resistance properties of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. In the literature there are some reports about that a satisfactory corrosion resistance that has been also obtained as a result of surface modification using PVD (Physical Vapour Deposition) [58], CVD (Chemical Vapour Deposition) [59], anodic polarization [60] and many other methods [61,62]. However, an important advantage of the ALD method over the others is the possibility of covering very complex implants shape.
The contact angle measurements showed that, the surface modification by the ALD method effected in the increase in wetting angle. Similar trends were noted by Basiaga et. al.for the ZnO layer [55,62] and a previous study about ZrO2 oxide layers deposited by ALD methods [24]. It was concluded from the comparative studies that the surface wettability conversion reactions on the tested samples are directly related to the morphology of the samples, especially to surface roughness. The AFM surface roughness calculation showed that the samples with the ZnO layer M2 were characterized by close to three-fold higher values of surface roughness parameters in nanoscale (Figure 3) as compared to the samples in the initial state M1. Based on this it was found that deposition of the ZnO layer by the ALD method leads to the increase of specific surface in nanoscale. Presented wetting states can be categorized in the Wenzel state [29,63]. According to the Wenzel condition, the reduction of the surface energy of the drop (due to surface tension forces) is associated with the formation of a spherical shape. According to Young’s Equation (5) ( γ s g , γ s l , γ l g are interfacial tensions of the solid–gas, solid–liquid and liquid–gas interference, respectively, Θ is the contact angle and r is the roughness ratio), the wettability depends on roughness effects. Similar results were obtained by Wang et al. [63] for Al2O3 thin films. The results reveal that the ALD method can be used to effectively modify the surface hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the ZnO layer.
cos Θ = r γ s g γ s l γ l g = r cos Θ
However, Wang [64] showed that the hydrophobic properties of Al2O3 films are attributed to carbon residue. The literature data suggested that metal oxides are generally intrinsically hydrophilic due the presence of metal cations, oxygen anions and hydroxyl group on the surface [64]. A similar conclusion was obtained by Bae et al. [65] showing that the hydrophobic nature of oxide layers deposited by the ALD method may be intrinsic to the result of the presence of adsorbed hydrocarbons. Increased hydrophobicity upon atmospheric exposure was observed for ZrO2, Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and CeO2 metal oxide surfaces. In future studies, an XPS analysis should be performed to confirm the literature reports. The hydrophobic character of the surface was a favorable phenomenon because lower wetting leads to reduced protein adsorption and limits the formation of microorganisms on the implant surface and in effect can provide better protection against biocorrosion.

5. Conclusions

The sum up, the pH of Ringer’s solution has a significant effect on the corrosion resistance of uncoated M1 samples and samples with the ZnO layer. For the samples tested in Ringer’s solution of pH = 5, lower corrosion resistance and an increased number of ions released to the medium were recorded. For samples with the ZnO layer, increased wetting angle and corrosion resistance, including pitting corrosion resistance and higher barrier properties, were recorded. The hydrophobic character of the surface and high value of surface free energy are associated with better corrosion resistance and can lead to reduced bacterial adhesion thereby, in effect, reducing biocorrosion. Additionally, along with the deposition of the ZnO layer, the amount of titanium ions released to the corrosion solution was reduced. The ZnO layer deposited on the Ti6Al4V substrate had better physicochemical properties compared to the uncoated samples. In the future, in vitro biological studies should be carried out to confirm the relationship between the chemical character of the surface treatment as well as cellular response and bacterial adhesion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W. and M.A.; methodology, A.W., W.W. and A.J.-K.; software, B.Z.; validation, M.A. and Z.B.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, A.W.; resources, A.W.; data curation, A.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W., W.W.; writing—review and editing, A.W.; visualization, A.W.; supervision, M.A.; project administration, A.W.; funding acquisition, Z.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geetha, M.; Singh, A.K.; Asokamani, R.; Gogia, A.K. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54, 397–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hamidi, M.F.F.A.; Harun, W.S.W.; Samykano, M.; Ghani, S.A.C.; Ghazalli, Z.; Ahmad, F.; Sulong, A.B. A review of biocompatible metal injection moulding process parameters for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cui, C.; Hu, B.M.; Zhao, L.; Liu, S. Titanium alloy production technology, market prospects and industry development. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chembath, M.; Balaraju, J.N.; Sujata, M. Surface characteristics, corrosion and bioactivity of chemically treated biomedical grade NiTi alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 56, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V. Implantable devices: Issues and challenges. Electronics 2012, 2, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ramezannejad, A.; Xu, W.; Xiao, W.L.; Fox, K.; Liang, D.; Qian, M. New insights into nickel-free superelastic titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019, 23, 100783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Attar, H.; Bermingham, M.J.; Ehtemam-Haghighi, S.; Dehghan-Manshadi, A.; Kent, D.; Dargusch, M.S. Evaluation of the mechanical and wear properties of titanium produced by three different additive manufacturing methods for biomedical application. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 760, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hanawa, T. Metal ion release from metal implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2004, 24, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mathew, M.T.; Srinivasa Pai, P.; Pourzal, R.; Fischer, A.; Wimmer, M.A. Significance of tribocorrosion in biomedical applications: Overview and current status. Adv. Tribol. 2009, 2009, 250986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Poitout, D.G. Biomechanics and Biomaterials in Orthopedics, 2nd ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 9781848826649. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hallam, P.; Haddad, F.; Cobb, J.; Orth, F.; Surgeon, O.W.W. Pain in the well-fixed, aseptic titanium hip replacement: The Role of Corrosion. J. Bone Jt. Surg. [Br.] 2004, 86, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lai, J.C.K.; Lai, M.B.; Jandhyam, S.; Dukhande, V.V.; Bhushan, A.; Daniels, C.K.; Leung, S.W. Exposure to titanium dioxide and other metallic oxide nanoparticles induces cytotoxicity on human neural cells and fibroblasts. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008, 3, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jin, C.-Y.; Zhu, B.-S.; Wang, X.-F.; Lu, Q.-H. Cytotoxicity of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Mouse Fibroblast Cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, 1871–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Magone, K.; Luckenbill, D.; Goswami, T. Metal ions as inflammatory initiators of osteolysis. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2015, 135, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, J.J.; Sanderson, B.J.S.; Wang, H. Cyto- and genotoxicity of ultrafine TiO2 particles in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2007, 628, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chan, E.; Cadosch, D.; Gautschi, O.P.; Sprengel, K.; Filgueira, L. Influence of metal ions on human lymphocytes and the generation of titanium-specific T-lymphocytes. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 2011, 9, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sarmiento-González, A.; Encinar, J.R.; Marchante-Gayón, J.M.; Sanz-Medel, A. Titanium levels in the organs and blood of rats with a titanium implant, in the absence of wear, as determined by double-focusing ICP-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 393, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yao, J.J.; Lewallen, E.A.; Trousdale, W.H.; Xu, W.; Thaler, R.; Salib, C.G.; Reina, N.; Abdel, M.P.; Lewallen, D.G.; van Wijnen, A.J. Local Cellular Responses to Titanium Dioxide from Orthopedic Implants. Biores. Open Access 2017, 6, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Heinonen, S.; Huttunen-Saarivirta, E.; Nikkanen, J.P.; Raulio, M.; Priha, O.; Laakso, J.; Storgårds, E.; Levänen, E. Antibacterial properties and chemical stability of superhydrophobic silver-containing surface produced by sol-gel route. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 453, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ren, G.; Hu, D.; Cheng, E.W.C.; Vargas-Reus, M.A.; Reip, P.; Allaker, R.P. Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sean Norman, R.; Stone, J.W.; Gole, A.; Murphy, C.J.; Sabo-Attwood, T.L. Targeted photothermal lysis of the pathogenic bacteria, pseudomonas aeruginosa, with gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Allahverdiyev, A.M.; Abamor, E.S.; Bagirova, M.; Rafailovich, M. Antimicrobial effects of TiO(2) and Ag(2)O nanoparticles against drug-resistant bacteria and leishmania parasites. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qiu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Jin, M.; Yang, D.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, J.; Shen, Z.; Wang, X.; Qian, D.; et al. Nanoalumina promotes the horizontal transfer of multiresistance genes mediated by plasmids across genera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4944–4949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ziębowicz, A.; Woźniak, A.; Ziębowicz, B.; Kosiel, K.; Chladek, G. The effect of atomic layer deposition of ZrO2 on the physicochemical properties of cobalt based alloys intended for prosthetic dentistry. Arch. Met. Mater. 2018, 63, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Padmavathy, N.; Vijayaraghavan, R. Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles—An antimicrobial study. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 035004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mao, C.; Xiang, Y.; Liu, X.; Cui, Z.; Yang, X.; Yeung, K.W.K.; Pan, H.; Wang, X.; Chu, P.K.; Wu, S. Photo-Inspired Antibacterial Activity and Wound Healing Acceleration by Hydrogel Embedded with Ag/Ag@AgCl/ZnO Nanostructures. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9010–9021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Foroutan, T. The effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblast. Nanomed. J. 2014, 1, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bowen, P.K.; Guillory, R.J.; Shearier, E.R.; Seitz, J.M.; Drelich, J.; Bocks, M.; Zhao, F.; Goldman, J. Metallic zinc exhibits optimal biocompatibility for bioabsorbable endovascular stents. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 56, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Duan, L.; Wang, N.; Xiao, F.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, J. Inorganic Surface Coating with Fast Wetting-Dewetting Transitions for Liquid Manipulations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19182–19188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Toptan, F.; Alves, A.C.; Carvalho, Ó.; Bartolomeu, F.; Pinto, A.M.P.; Silva, F.; Miranda, G. Corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting and hot pressing in comparison with the commercial alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019, 266, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bower, K.; Murray, S.; Reinhart, A.; Nieto, A. Corrosion resistance of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V alloy in salt fog environment. Results Mater. 2020, 8, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Berbel, L.O.; Banczek, E.D.; Karousis, I.K.; Kotsakis, G.A.; Costa, I. Determinants of corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy dental implants in an In Vitro model of peri-implant inflammation. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Schmidt, A.M.; Azambuja, D.S. Corrosion behavior of ti and Ti6Al4V in citrate buffers containing fluoride ions. Mater. Res. 2010, 13, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Oshida, Y. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; ISBN 9780080451428. [Google Scholar]
  35. Belcarz, A.; Bieniaś, J.; Surowska, B.; Ginalska, G. Studies of bacterial adhesion on TiN, SiO2-TiO2 and hydroxyapatite thin layers deposited on titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy for medical applications. Thin Solid Films 2010, 519, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, L.; Bhatia, R.; Webster, T.J. Atomic layer deposition of nano-TiO2 thin films with enhanced biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity for orthopedic implants. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 8711–8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Oviroh, P.O.; Akbarzadeh, R.; Pan, D.; Coetzee, R.A.M.; Jen, T.C. New development of atomic layer deposition: Processes, methods and applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 465–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. PN-EN ISO 5832-3:2017-02 Implanty dla Chirurgii—Materiały Metalowe—Część 3: Stop Tytanu 6-Aluminium 4-Wanad do Przeróbki Plastycznej; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  39. ASTM F136—13; Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56401); West Conshohocken: Montgomery County, PA, USA, 2013.
  40. Staszuk, M.; Pakuła, D.; Reimann, Ł.; Król, M.; Basiaga, M.; Mysłek, D.; Kříž, A. Structure and properties of ZnO coatings obtained by atomic layer deposition (ALD) method on a Cr-Ni-Mo steel substrate type. Materials 2020, 13, 4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. PN-EN ISO 10993-13:2010 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 15: Identification and Quantification of Degradation Products from Metals and Alloys; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  42. Seweryn, A.; Pietruszka, R.; Witkowski, B.S.; Wierzbicka, A.; Jakiela, R.; Sybilski, P.; Godlewski, M. Structural and Electrical Parameters of ZnO Thin Films Grown by ALD with either Water or Ozone as Oxygen Precursors. Crystals 2019, 9, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Feng, J.; Xiong, S.; Wang, Z.; Cui, Z.; Sun, S.P.; Wang, Y. Atomic layer deposition of metal oxides on carbon nanotube fabrics for robust, hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2018, 550, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bhola, R.; Bhola, S.M.; Mishra, B.; Olson, D.L. Electrochemical behavior of titanium and its alloys as dental implants in normal saline. Res. Lett. Phys. Chem. 2009, 3, 574359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kadowaki, N.T.; Martinez, G.A.S.; Robin, A. Electrochemical behavior of three CP titanium dental implants in artificial saliva. Mater. Res. 2009, 12, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Levy, G.K.; Goldman, J.; Aghion, E. The prospects of zinc as a structural material for biodegradable implants—A review paper. Metals 2017, 7, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Krężel, A.; Maret, W. The biological inorganic chemistry of zinc ions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 611, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Baszkiewicz, J.; Kamiński, M. Korozja Materiałów; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej OWPW: Warsaw, Poland, 2006; pp. 145–162. [Google Scholar]
  49. Basiaga, M.; Walke, W.; Antonowicz, M.; Kajzer, W.; Szewczenko, J.; Domanowska, A.; Michalewicz, A.; Szindler, M.; Staszuk, M.; Czajkowski, M. Impact of Surface Treatment on the Functional Properties Stainless Steel for Biomedical Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Woźniak, A.; Adamiak, M.; Chladek, G.; Bonek, M.; Walke, W.; Bialas, O. The Influence of Hybrid Surface Modification on the Selected Properties of CP Titanium Grade II Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Materials 2020, 13, 2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dai, N.; Zhang, L.C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; Wu, M. Corrosion behavior of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4 V alloy in NaCl solution. Corros. Sci. 2016, 102, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Y.; Addison, O.; Yu, F.; Troconis, B.C.R.; Scully, J.R.; Davenport, A.J. Time-dependent Enhanced Corrosion of Ti6Al4V in the Presence of H2O2 and Albumin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Blackwood, D.J.; Chua, A.W.C.; Seah, K.H.W.; Thampuran, R.; Teoh, S.H. Corrosion behaviour of porous titanium-graphite composites designed for surgical implants. Corros. Sci. 2000, 42, 481–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yin, Q.; Wang, Z.Y.; Liu, M.R.; Pan, C. Synergistic Effect of NaCl and SO2 on the Initial Atmospheric Corrosion of Zinc Under Wet–Dry Cyclic Conditions. Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett. 2019, 32, 780–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Basiaga, M.; Walke, W.; Antonowicz, M.; Szindler, M.; Nakonieczny, D.; Kajzer, W.; Dubiel, A.; Matus, K. Evaluation of electrochemical properties of antibacterial ZnO layers deposited to 316LVM steel using atomic layer deposition. Materwiss. Werksttech. 2020, 51, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thomas, S.; Birbilis, N.; Venkatraman, M.S.; Cole, I.S. Corrosion of zinc as a function of pH. Corrosion 2012, 68, 015009-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Basiaga, M.; Walke, W.; Staszuk, M.; Kajzer, W.; Kajzer, A.; Nowińska, K. Influence of ALD process parameters on the physical and chemical properties of the surface of vascular stents. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2017, 17, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oliveira, V.M.C.A.; Aguiar, C.; Vazquez, A.M.; Robin, A.L.M.; Barboza, M.J.R. Corrosion Behavior Analysis of Plasma-assited PVD Coated Ti-6Al-4V alloy in 2M NaOH Solution. Mat. Res. 2017, 20, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sitek, R.; Kaminski, J.; Borysiuk, J.; Matysiak, H.; Kubiak, K.; Kurzydlowski, K.J. Microstructure and properties of titanium aluminides on Ti6Al4V titanium alloy produced by chemical vapor depositions method. Intermetallics 2013, 36, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chrzanowski, W.; Szewczenko, J.; Tyrlik-Held, J.; Marciniak, J.; Żak, J. Influence of the anodic oxidation on the physicochemical properties of the Ti6Al4V ELI alloy. J. Master. Process. Technol. 2005, 162/163, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Memarzadeh, K.; Sharili, A.S.; Huang, J.; Rawlinson, S.C.F.; Allaker, R.P. Nanoparticulate zinc oxide as a coating material for orthopedic and dental implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2015, 103, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kirmanidou, Y.; Sidira, M.; Drosou, M.E.; Bennani, V.; Bakopoulou, A.; Tsouknidas, A.; Michailidis, M.; Michalakis, K. New Ti-Alloys and Surface Modifications to Improve the Mechanical Properties and the Biological Response to Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Forsberg, P.S.H.; Priest, C.; Brinkmann, M.; Sedev, R.; Ralston, J. Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel state. Langmuir 2010, 26, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, L.C.; Han, Y.Y.; Yang, K.C.; Chen, M.J.; Lin, H.C.; Lin, C.K.; Hsu, Y.T. Hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface of Al2O3 thin films grown by thermal and plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition on plasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 305, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bae, J.; Samek, I.A.; Stair, P.C.; Snurr, R.Q. Investigation of the Hydrophobic Nature of Metal Oxide Surfaces Created by Atomic Layer Deposition. Langmuir 2019, 35, 5762–5769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ti6Al4V titanium alloy powder characterization (a) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of powder morphology, (b) particle size distributions.
Figure 1. Ti6Al4V titanium alloy powder characterization (a) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of powder morphology, (b) particle size distributions.
Materials 14 00230 g001
Figure 2. Oxide layer ZnO characterization (a) surface morphology scanning electron microscopy (SEM); (b) X-ray energy dispersive plot.
Figure 2. Oxide layer ZnO characterization (a) surface morphology scanning electron microscopy (SEM); (b) X-ray energy dispersive plot.
Materials 14 00230 g002
Figure 3. Examples surface topography analysis (a) 3D view of atomic force microscopy (AFM) scan from 10 × 10 µm2 M1; (b) 3D view of AFM scan from 10 × 10 µm M2.
Figure 3. Examples surface topography analysis (a) 3D view of atomic force microscopy (AFM) scan from 10 × 10 µm2 M1; (b) 3D view of AFM scan from 10 × 10 µm M2.
Materials 14 00230 g003
Figure 4. Open circuit potential for M1 and M2 sample groups in Ringer solution of pH = 7.4 and pH = 5, exposure for t = 1 h.
Figure 4. Open circuit potential for M1 and M2 sample groups in Ringer solution of pH = 7.4 and pH = 5, exposure for t = 1 h.
Materials 14 00230 g004
Figure 5. Pourbaix diagram for (a) titanium at T = 37 °C; (b) for zinc.
Figure 5. Pourbaix diagram for (a) titanium at T = 37 °C; (b) for zinc.
Materials 14 00230 g005
Figure 6. Example of polarization curves (a) M1 samples group; (b) M2 sample group.
Figure 6. Example of polarization curves (a) M1 samples group; (b) M2 sample group.
Materials 14 00230 g006
Figure 7. Examples of results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test for M1 and M2 samples (a,c,e,g) Nyquist diagram; (b,d,f,h) Bode diagram.
Figure 7. Examples of results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test for M1 and M2 samples (a,c,e,g) Nyquist diagram; (b,d,f,h) Bode diagram.
Materials 14 00230 g007aMaterials 14 00230 g007b
Figure 8. Electric substitute scheme (a) M1 pH = 7.4 and pH = 5; (b) M2 pH = 7.4; (c) M2 pH = 5.
Figure 8. Electric substitute scheme (a) M1 pH = 7.4 and pH = 5; (b) M2 pH = 7.4; (c) M2 pH = 5.
Materials 14 00230 g008
Figure 9. Examples of SEM observations of the M2 sample group (a) sponge-like corrosion products; (b,c) corrosion products in form of laminar crystals (d) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) results for marked area in Figure 9c.
Figure 9. Examples of SEM observations of the M2 sample group (a) sponge-like corrosion products; (b,c) corrosion products in form of laminar crystals (d) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) results for marked area in Figure 9c.
Materials 14 00230 g009
Figure 10. Examples of SEM observations of the M2 sample group after corrosion tests.
Figure 10. Examples of SEM observations of the M2 sample group after corrosion tests.
Materials 14 00230 g010
Figure 11. Results of contact angle measurements (a) drop M1; (b) contact angle values changes in time function M1; (c) drop M2; (d) contact angle values changes in time function M2.
Figure 11. Results of contact angle measurements (a) drop M1; (b) contact angle values changes in time function M1; (c) drop M2; (d) contact angle values changes in time function M2.
Materials 14 00230 g011
Table 1. Chemical composition of the Ti6Al4V titanium alloy.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the Ti6Al4V titanium alloy.
Element, wt. (%)AlVFeOCNiHTi
Declared5.50–6.503.50–4.50≤0.25≤0.13≤0.08≤0.05≤0.012rest
ISO 5832-35.5–6.753.5–4.5≤0.3≤0.2≤0.08≤0.05≤0.015rest
Powder5.603.70≤0.1≤0.2---rest
As-Fabricated5.903.95≤0.1----rest
Table 2. The values of surface free energy (SFE) and their components for distilled water and diiodonomethane used in the Owens–Wendt method [24].
Table 2. The values of surface free energy (SFE) and their components for distilled water and diiodonomethane used in the Owens–Wendt method [24].
Measure LiquidSFE, (mJ/m2)
γL γ L d γ L P
Distilled water72.8021.8051.00
Diiodonomethane50.8050.800
Table 3. Results of pitting corrosion test—mean values and standard deviations. Ecorr—corrosion potential, Etr—traspassivation potential, Eb—breakdown potential, Ecp—repassivation potential, ba, bc—Tafels componets, Rp—polarization resistance, icorr—current density.
Table 3. Results of pitting corrosion test—mean values and standard deviations. Ecorr—corrosion potential, Etr—traspassivation potential, Eb—breakdown potential, Ecp—repassivation potential, ba, bc—Tafels componets, Rp—polarization resistance, icorr—current density.
pHNameEcorr, (mV)Etr, (mV)Eb, (mV)Ecp, (mV)ba (mV)bc, (mV)Rp, (kΩ ·cm2)icorr, (µA/cm2)
7.4M1−298 ± 212410 ± 120--64 ± 967 ± 7469 ± 870.028 ± 0.002
5−175 ± 11-1800 ± 89827 ± 7454 ± 669 ± 8568± 1110.026 ± 0.005
7.4M2−85 ± 12-2958 ± 781120 ± 98256 ± 1488 ± 910973 ± 2120.003 ± 0.001
5−205 ± 14-2600 ± 1021000 ± 124207 ± 1988 ± 141563 ± 1200.017 ± 0.001
Table 4. Results of EIS test.
Table 4. Results of EIS test.
Name pH Eopcr, [mV] Rs, [Ωcm2] Rad, [kΩcm2] Cad, [µF] CPEad Rpore, [Ωcm2] Cpore, [µF] CPEpore, [mV] Rct, [kΩcm2] CPEdl, [mV]
Y0, [kΩcm−m s−n] n0 Y1, [kΩcm−m s−n] n1 Y, [Ωcm−m s−n] n2
M17.4−32085----3875--4490.4178 × 10−40.78
M15−27175----1445--39304851 × 10−40.72
M27.4−13386402--8113--8850.6590 × 10−50.78
M25−12874----204 0.3784 × 10−50.9018920.1573 × 10−40.84
Table 5. Results of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) analysis.
Table 5. Results of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) analysis.
No.pHNameRelease Ions, (mg/L)
AlVTiZn
17.4M1<0.01<0.01<0.01-
25M10.02<0.010.14-
37.4M2-<0.01<0.010.15
45M2-<0.01<0.010.44
Table 6. Results of contact angle measurements and calculated SFE.
Table 6. Results of contact angle measurements and calculated SFE.
No.NameWetting Angle, (°)Surface Free Energy, (mJ/m2)
Distilled WaterDiiodonomethaneγS γ d S γ p S
1M163 ± 345 ± 2422319
2M2110 ± 254 ± 143421
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Woźniak, A.; Walke, W.; Jakóbik-Kolon, A.; Ziębowicz, B.; Brytan, Z.; Adamiak, M. The Influence of ZnO Oxide Layer on the Physicochemical Behavior of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials 2021, 14, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010230

AMA Style

Woźniak A, Walke W, Jakóbik-Kolon A, Ziębowicz B, Brytan Z, Adamiak M. The Influence of ZnO Oxide Layer on the Physicochemical Behavior of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials. 2021; 14(1):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Woźniak, Anna, Witold Walke, Agata Jakóbik-Kolon, Bogusław Ziębowicz, Zbigniew Brytan, and Marcin Adamiak. 2021. "The Influence of ZnO Oxide Layer on the Physicochemical Behavior of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy" Materials 14, no. 1: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010230

APA Style

Woźniak, A., Walke, W., Jakóbik-Kolon, A., Ziębowicz, B., Brytan, Z., & Adamiak, M. (2021). The Influence of ZnO Oxide Layer on the Physicochemical Behavior of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials, 14(1), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop