Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Modified with Fly Ash
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical and Structural Changes by Gold Addition Using Recharge Method in NiW/Al2O3-CeO2-TiO2 Nanomaterials
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Behaviors of Mortar Reinforced with NiTi SMA Fibers under Impact Compressive Loading
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Anticancer Activity of Phytomolecules Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized by Aqueous Extracts of Zingiber officinale (Ginger) and Nigella sativa L. Seeds (Black Cumin)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanocarbon Type Xerogel Materials Designed for Water Desalination

Environment, Energy & Climate Change Department, National Institute for Research and Development in Electrical Engineering ICPE-CA, Splaiul Unirii 313, 030138 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(17), 4932; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174932
Submission received: 13 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 25 August 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Applications of Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
The relative performance of different porous solids in different applications is highly dependent on the internal pore structure of each material. Highly porous carbon materials can be prepared by evaporative drying and the pyrolysis of resorcinol-formaldehyde gels. By determining the correct synthesis parameters, the pore system of such materials can be reshaped. Depending on some important processing factors such as the dilution ratio or the initial pH of the precursor solution, various porous or non-porous carbon materials can be synthesized. This paper addresses carbon xerogels (CX) designed as a material electrode in capacitive deionization (CDI) systems for water desalination. In this work CX materials were synthesized via poly-condensation reactions of resorcinol with formaldehyde (RF) on a carbon felt sheet followed by pyrolysis. The resulting sheets were used as electrodes to develop a CDI experimental multi-cell laboratory system. The initial pH of the RF solution and the dilution ratio effect on the resulting carbon surface area and structure were analyzed. Surface area measurements using the BET method and an electrochemical capacitance evaluation of the obtained xerogels through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy were also performed. Finally, using our experimental CDI multi-cell laboratory system based on the obtained CX, we discuss the experimental data for the desalination rate as a function of the voltage and salt concentration. As a result, the developed model’s efficiency is demonstrated. The main goal of this work was to develop an efficient electrode-based novel carbon that could be commercially competitive, as well as to create guidelines for future desalination research using CX electrode materials.

1. Introduction

The desalination of seawater based on capacitive deionization (CDI) principles is a unique and novel technology. It seems straightforward that charged ionic species can be easily removed from aqueous solutions with this feasible method.
CDI has developed itself as a viable alternative to reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, and thermal distillation for desalination [1,2,3]. It makes use of the basic capacitor principles to remove dissolved ions from a water stream. The electrodes happen to be the electrochemical surfaces where ions are adsorbed following the principles of the double layer [4]. Therefore, CDI can be considered as an electrochemical reaction that occurs in a “flow-through” double layer capacitor [5]. During CDI treatment, salty water flows between pairs of porous charged electrodes [6]. The strong electrostatic forces between the ionic species in the solution and the charged electrodes control CDI separation. Deionized water is generated when positive and negative electrodes attract oppositely charged ions. After being saturated with salts or impurities, the electrodes are regenerated by removing the electric field when the adsorbed ions on the electrodes’ surfaces are desorbed and released into a concentrated stream. Previous research demonstrated that the efficiency of CDI strongly depends upon the surface property of the electrodes, such as surface area, the size distribution of pores, the microstructure, chemical functional groups, or the electro-sorption capacitance [7,8,9,10]. However, operational parameters such as the external voltage, the mass flow, the interlayer thickness between the two electrodes, the flow channel design, or the concentration of the solution of ions, among others, influence CDI’s desalting performance [11].
The adsorption and desorption of ions is complete during the charging–discharging of the CDI electrodes. Therefore, CDI technology merely requires electrode materials with a high surface area, a high capacitance, and a high desalination efficiency [12]. Recently, carbon materials such as carbon nanotubes [13], graphene [14], aerogels [15,16], xerogels [17], and activated [18] or mesoporous carbons [19], have been used in the fabrication of tailored electrodes engineered for this technology [20]. However, the most frequently used electrode material is carbon aerogel [21,22,23,24]. It is common practice to produce carbon aerogels by the supercritical drying of wet resorcinol–formaldehyde (RF) gels. Even so, this method requires high pressures (up to 6.89 × 106 Pa), which could generate potential hazards [25,26,27] and make it expensive to scale-up production for industrial use.
It is advantageous to make the electrodes ion-selective, to improve the charge efficiency, and thus reduce the energy input corresponding to a proper desalination performance. This can be usually completed by chemically modifying the electrodes [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Non-modified carbons can adsorb either cations or anions, depending on the electrode potential [16,36,37]. The desalination of water can be achieved using a system design based on these non-modified carbons. CDI has the potential to play a significant role in the water industry, despite the challenges [38,39,40,41]. However, capital, and operational costs are major concerns for CDI given that, its main competitive advantage is the ability to remove a wide spectrum of ionic species with high recovery rates. In part, today’s high costs are due to the low production volumes and immature industrial processability of electrodes. While CDI membrane development has received relatively little attention, significant essential emphasis has been placed on novel carbon materials for use in CDI.
In this research, we generate carbon nanowhiskers as a new form of carbon xerogels (CX) from resorcinol–formaldehyde precursors and successfully use them as electrodes in a CDI experimental laboratory system. The usual methods to grow carbon nanowhiskers include plasma-enhanced hot filament chemical vapour deposition, plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition, electron-beam-induced deposition, field emission-induced growth, dry plasma processing, or ion beam delivery. Furthermore, metals are thought to catalyse the growth of whisker structures [42]. In this study, carbon (nano)whiskers were produced by the polycondensation reaction of resorcinol with formaldehyde, without the use of an external carbon source (as in a plasma-controlled environment) or a metal catalyst. In this light, we consider our method of generating carbon (nano)whiskers as a valuable alternative synthesis technique to the ones already or currently in use. Assuming that CX properties can be tailored depending on the synthesis conditions, their modeling for CDI systems was based on their relatively high electrical conductivity, which makes them ideal materials for use as electrodes in energy storage devices, as long as CDI has been assimilated with an electrical double layer capacitor [43]. Laboratory trials confirm that carbon (nano)whiskers can compete from an operational perspective with well-known porous carbon xerogels.

2. Materials and Methods

For the synthesis of the RF gels, resorcinol [C6H4(OH)2](R) (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, research grade) and formaldehyde 37% (HCHO) (F), (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, research grade) were purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, Chimexim, Bucharest, Romania. The catalyst used was sodium carbonate (C) Na2CO3 (99%, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Anhydrous glycerin (pure grade) Chemical Company, Iasi, Romania, acetone 99.5%, and ethanol 99% from Redox Research & Analytics SRL Otopeni, Romania were also used as reagents. Deionized water was used as a solvent. The processing of the CX electrodes followed the path described below.

2.1. Synthesis of the Initial RF Solution

In this work, the RF organic gels were synthesized by the reaction of resorcinol (R) with formaldehyde (F), (2:1 molar ratio) in the presence of sodium carbonate Na2CO3 as a catalyst and water. To prevent the rapid increase in the polycondensation rate between the reagents, pure glycerin was added as a plasticizer agent (1%wt).
The amount of the catalyst was considered as the molar ratio of resorcinol to the catalyst (R/C), whose value was chosen from R/C = 20 to 1000 [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Next, RF solutions were immersed in acetone media, poured into glass vials, and heated between 50 and 70 °C for up to 180 min in reflux system conditions.

2.2. Preparing the CX Sheets Electrodes—Design of the RF Components/Electrodes for the CDI Experimental Module

In terms of our intended application, some disadvantages of carbon gels include brittleness and shrinkage during processing. To address this issue, it has been demonstrated that carbon aerogels can be reinforced with carbon fibers to reduce shrinkage and increase flexibility [53]. By impregnating the RF solution in carbon fiber type materials and then drying/pyrolyzing them, a flexible carbon gel can be prepared. Our approach to obtaining CDI electrodes based on CX followed the same path.
In brief, several steps were involved in our method of preparing CX electrodes: a-synthesis of the initial RF organic solutions, b-gelation, c-drying, d-impregnation of carbon felt sheets with RF gels, and d-pyrolysis of the RF-impregnated carbon sheets. CX plates should be made first in the construction of a desalination device. Thus, rectangular-shaped carbon felt sheets (Alfa Aesar GmbH & Co, Karlsruhe, Germany, 99.0%) of (150 × 50 × 6) mm were thoroughly washed with hot deionized water (90 °C) and dried in vacuum at 100 °C for 3 h. The as-prepared carbon felt was impregnated with RF solutions under vacuum at 60 °C for 24 h. Further, the carbon felt containing the RF solution was soaked in ethanol for 3 h and then dried at −40 °C for a 24 h period. The drying process was sustained in an ALPHA 1-2LDplus freeze dryer, CHRIST, Osterode am Harz, Germany. The obtained dried RF-carbon felt sheets were heated between 850 and 900 °C in a controlled atmosphere under argon flow in a tube furnace for 4 h. The flow rate of the inert gas was 20 cm3/min. The schematic representation of the overall CX sheets synthesis process is shown below (Figure 1).

2.3. Characterisation of the CX Electrodes—Equipment

The morphology of the CX samples was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a Carl Zeiss SMT FESEM-FIB (Scanning Microscope Tunneling Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope-Focused Ion Beam) Auriga, Oberkochen, Germany type scanner in the following conditions: the tension of acceleration was 10 kV and the magnitude was between 20 and 50 k.
The specific surface area and pore size distribution of the CX electrodes were determined using a surface analyzer AUTOSORB—TD1-Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, SUA, based on the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm. The specific surface area was calculated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method.
Conductivity variations of NaCl solutions and/or artificial sea water used to evaluate the desalination efficiency of the CDI experimental laboratory system were measured by using a digital multiparameter, Consort C860-Fischer Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium.
A potentiostat/galvanostat VoltaLab 40, Radiometer Analytical, Villeurbanne, France with a dynamic EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) connected to a computer via the VoltaMaster 4 Software interface was operated for the electrochemical measurements.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of RF Gels

The polycondensation of resorcinol (R) and formaldehyde (F) in the presence of water and sodium carbonate as a catalyst (C) yielded organic RF gels. The aqueous polycondensation of R (1,3 dihydroxybenzene) with F is usually the first step in the synthesis of RF gels. Under alkaline circumstances, this reaction undergoes a sol-gel transition, creating a strongly cross-linked polymer. R acts as a trifunctional monomer in this process, capable of electrophilic aromatic substitution at the active two, four, and six ring locations. Formaldehyde forms a covalent bond between the resorcinol rings, resulting in significant crosslinking densities. The generation of hydroxymethyl (-CH2OH) resorcinol derivatives and the condensation of hydroxymethyl derivatives to create methylene and methylene ether-bridging compounds are the main processes as is shown in Figure 2.
According to the literature [44] the RF polycondesation mechanism consists of two steps:
  • the synthesis of hydroxymetyl derivates from resorcinol anions via hydrogen abstraction (increased by OH-) and formaldehyde addition;
  • condensation of hydroxymetyl derivates and cluster growth. These two sections demonstrate how the final texture is influenced by the RF gels’ synthesis parameters at the start (e.g., pH and dilution ratio). The first addition reaction is favored when the pH rises, resulting in very branched and unstable aggregates and smaller, more connected polymer particles. In Figure 3 is illustrated the general mechanism of RF gel networks development including formation and condensation of hydroxymethyl derivates.
The formation of nucleation sites, their expansion, and the cross-linking of polymer chains are all affected by the concentrations of the reagents used. The values of these variables will determine the final polymeric structure. Subsequently, the polymeric structure will affect the expected carbon gel features.

3.2. Characterizations of CX

In order to assess the effect of the synthesis conditions on the final surface area of the pyrolyzed RF gels, four starting compositions were prepared (Table 1).
Because aerogels contain a significant amount of moisture and organic components, theoretically, they have a low surface area and a high electrical resistance, limiting their use as electrode materials. Pyrolysis removes the volatile materials and facilitates the generation of conjugated sp2-carbon atoms, which could be a viable way to enhance the surface area and improve the electrical conductivity. The pyrolysis parameters (e.g., pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and final temperature) have a significant impact on the textural characteristics (e.g., conductivity, morphology, porosity, and surface chemistry) as is seen in Table 1. As a result, the R/C molar ratio was chosen as the variable that would be held responsible for the polycondensation outcome (the R/F = 0.5 was maintained constant). Therefore, an additional set of variants were prepared to demonstrate the importance of R/C and the dilution ratio on the RF–CX characteristics.
The dilution ratio was considered as: D = water/(resorcinol + formaldehyde + sodium carbonate) molar ratio. Table 2 summarizes the various synthesis parameters.
It became clear that the surface area of RF organogels and CX could be controlled by modifying the synthesis conditions. From the preliminary results shown in Table 2, it became clear that the surface area of an RF gel increases when the R/C ratio is low.
On the other hand, the same R/C and a higher R/F ratio resulted in an increase in the surface area of the organogels and a decrease in the surface area of CX.
The pyrolysis temperature also has a strong impact on the surface area of CX. For the same R/C and R/F ratio, the increase in the pyrolysis temperature led to a significant increase in the surface area of the carbon products from 1.03 × 102 m2/g to 2.45 × 102 m2/g or from 1.55 × 102 m2/g to 3.85 m2/g. It can be considered that a microporous system is formed during the pyrolysis of RF aerogels. In this view, further investigation regarding the type of evolved porosity must be completed. Figure 4a and Figure 5a show the adsorption–desorption isotherms of the X2 and X4 CX variants. For these samples, type IV isotherms were observed, indicating the presence of mesopores and macro-pores, which correlated with the pore volume measurements (DFT pore volume diagrams) (Figure 4c and Figure 5c) and the pore volume histograms (Figure 4d and Figure 5d).
Type IV isotherms resemble type II isotherms but additionally, instead of adsorption on open surfaces at high relative pressures, adsorption takes place in mesoporosity. Adsorption using mesoporous materials is often associated with a hysteresis loop between the adsorption and desorption isotherm [54].
SBET ranged from 310 m2/g (pH = 5.55) to 887 m2/g (pH = 6.85). The smallest surface area was registered at the lowest pH and D values, while the biggest surface area value was achieved at the highest D values. The pH and dilution ratio are two obvious variables that could affect the porosity nature of RF gels. However, the pyrolysis process also impacts the surface area by decomposing the organic skeletal system.

3.3. Appearance of the RF Gels

The RF solution changed color from colorless to dark red as the polycondensation reaction progressed. The R/C, R/F, or D ratio appears to affect the color of RF aqua gels. For 20 < R/C < 500, the gels were reddish and clear. They became darker as the R/C decreased.
In Figure 6 it is shown appearance of an RF gel obtained for (a) R/C = 500 and (b) R/C = 200.
For R/C > 500, the gels were dark reddish in color. The gel’s appearance was also influenced by the R/F ratio. The carbon materials developed as a result of pyrolysis were black. This article did not investigate R/D dependency.

3.4. Morphology of the RF Gels after Pyrolysis

For the morphological analysis, the CX variants with the highest surface area value were considered. Two primary and distinct types of morphologies were obtained based on the synthesis variables. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed that RF–CX could have a structure that is made up of interconnected spherical particles with a hierarchical porosity as is shown in Figure 7 (case of variant X1 and X3) or a randomly aligned whisker morphology as is illustrated in Figure 8. (case of X2 and X4 variants).
It is worth noting that well-developed methods such as laser evaporation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), arc discharge, and the plasma-controlled environment are generally used to prepare whisker structures [55]. Graphite whiskers are the first nonplanar graphitic structures to be synthesized in a controlled manner [56]. Graphite whiskers and filaments have also been shown to evolve during the pyrolytic deposition of numerous different hydrocarbon materials [57]. In this research, whiskers were generated without the need for a metal catalyst or an external carbon supply. If the surface area values are analyzed, it becomes clear that the X2 and X4 variants that exhibited a whisker type morphology had the highest surface area value. In Figure 7 a scanning electron microscopy of the X4 variant (X4/RF gel variant impregnated in carbon felt) after pyrolysis is shown.
Pure CX are too brittle to be machined in certain specimen dimensions for an electrode development. The brittleness of the CX was overcome by strengthening it with carbon felt. Combining the flexibility of carbon felt, our carbon felt/CX electrodes could be manufactured in a large-scale environment and machined to any shape, which is critical for this application. As shown in Figure 9e an optical microscopy revealed the appearance of the CX electrode surface.

3.5. Electrochemical Characterization of CX-Based Electrodes

Electrochemical measurements were performed to select the appropriate CX variant to be further tested as the electrode in our experimental CDI module. The highest recorded double layer capacity was used to consider this selection. Therefore, the electrochemical behavior of the X1, X2, X3, and X4 CX variants was studied in a standard electrochemical cell with a three electrodes arrangement. A platinum plate electrode and an Ag/AgCl electrode were used as a counter and reference electrode, respectively. Samples with a 1 cm2 geometric surface area were analyzed. Impedance measurements were performed at the open circuit potential of each sample in the frequency range between 100 kHz and 10 mHz with an AC wave of ±10 mV (peak-to-peak) overlaid on a DC bias potential. The impedance data were obtained at a rate of 10 points per decade change in frequency. All tests were carried out in various NaCl solutions with concentrations of 0.5M, 0.25M, and 0.1M at room temperature and 1012 ± 5 hPa under atmospheric conditions, without agitation. Bode and Nyquist plots for the X1–X4 carbon xerogel variants are illustrated below (Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17 and Figure 18).
A circular regression with a fitting coefficient greater than 0.98 was used to derive the EIS parameters such as, electrolyte resistance (Rel), polarization resistance (Rp), and double layer capacity (Cdl) from the Nyquist plots (Table 3).
Except for sample X2 in NaCl 0.25M, the polarization resistance fell as the electrolyte concentration increased in all situations. Furthermore, as the electrolyte concentration dropped, the capacity of the double layer decreased.
Of all the electrolyte concentrations, the X4 sample (carbon nanowhisker structures) had the highest double layer capacity and the lowest polarization resistance. At all electrolyte concentrations, the Bode plots show a general medium-high capacitive behavior with medium-weak diffusive tendencies (phase angle values were between 65 and 800) associated with a single time constant in the case of the X1, X2, and X3 samples and a single Debye semicircle on the Nyquist plots. A distinct response was found for the X4 sample, which is dependent on the electrolyte concentration. At 0.5M we can see a two-time constant evolution (a duplex equivalent of two distinct electrode–electrolyte interfaces) in the frequency range, first at 100 Hz associated with an inductive behavior (corresponding phase angle at approx. 250), followed by a second time constant at 10mHz (corresponding phase angle at approx. 550) associated with a weak capacitive behavior with high diffusive tendencies. In the case of the 0.25M NaCl electrolyte, the X4 sample showed a single time constant at a frequency around 10 Hz with a phase angle near 800, while in the case of 0.1M NaCl electrolyte, the single time constant was situated at 100 Hz and a phase angle of 550. This type of non-linear variable behavior in the same electrolyte at different concentrations suggested that the electrode–electrolyte interface(s) were subjected to different phenomena in the case of X4 sample. The synthesis parameters applied to obtain the X4–CX type nanowhiskers variant are reflected in a surface area that was higher than the other samples (887 m2/g) (Table 2). As a result, the electrode–electrolyte interface may have a higher hydrophilic behavior, resulting in a significant increase in the electrochemical surface area and double layer capacity (Table 3).

3.6. Performance Evaluation of CX-Based Electrodes for Capacitive Desalination

3.6.1. CDI Operating Principle

A CDI cell is made up of two porous electrodes, isolated by a non-conductive material. The feed stream flows between or through the charged electrodes [58]. Desalination is accomplished by exposing the electrodes to a low voltage, between 0.8 and 1.5 V, which causes the salt ions in the feed stream to move to the electrical double layers (EDLs) at the carbon—water interface [59]. When the electrodes become saturated, the electrical potential can be reversed (the anode becomes the cathode and conversely) releasing the adsorbed ions from the electrodes.

3.6.2. Design of Laboratory Scale CDI Module

The CDI module, used in our study to assess the desalination potential of the CX-based electrode, consists of 11 cells formed by pairs of electrodes. Each cell includes two CX type nanowhisker electrodes of (150 × 50 × 6) mm3 each, arranged in a parallel plane, equidistant with a spacer (non-conducting membrane) in between. The separator media is necessary to ensure electrical isolation between electrodes and the facile flow of the water stream through the CX electrodes.
The carbon electrodes are charged by means of collectors, with the help of a stabilized DC voltage source. Rectangular plates (of the same size/geometrical features as CX electrodes) made of synthetic graphite (electrographite-EG122-Electrographite Carbon CO.LTD) were used as current collectors. Through electrical connections, the collectors are in direct contact with the power source. The basic CDI unit cell has an electrode separation distance of 1.5 mm. Figure 19 shows a schematic diagram of one CDI cell.
The CDI laboratory module was constructed by stacking 11 CDI unit cells. Overall, the CDI module comprised: 22 CX type nanowhisker-based electrodes, 20 electrographite electrical current collectors, and 20 spacers.
An image of the constructed CDI stack-based CX-type nanowhiskers is illustrated in Figure 20.
The water feed was injected into the CDI module using a peristaltic pump (DC 24V Motor No. KDM 3429-24-500, Kookjae Precision Co., Incheon, Korea). As the saline feed stream in this study, NaCl 0.5M solution and artificial sea water were used. When the electrodes are subjected to a low voltage (0.8–1.2 V) during the operating phase, cations and anions are drawn towards them and adsorbed until they become saturated. Due to the electrodes’ limited ion adsorption capacity, the number of ions transported and adsorbed on the electrode surface gradually decreases over the operation cycle. As a result, the flowing water stream conductivity steadily increases up to the inlet water’s conductivity. The experiments were conducted continuously (without water re-circulation). Controlling the potential difference across each cell at a constant voltage is required. As a result, the electrode pair wiring layout inside the module was chosen to have the electrodes connected in parallel. The use of parallel electrodes has a number of advantages such as: a. the system can be easily adjusted at the necessary low voltage values; b. it is safer from an operational perspective due to the voltage setup; c. all electrode pairs have uniform operational conditions, resulting in a more homogeneous ion adsorption setting. The composition of the artificial sea water used in the experiments is shown in Table 4.
A schematic diagram of the CDI experimental set-up next to an image of the laboratory CDI system is shown below (Figure 21).
As previously stated, the tests were carried out with two types of aqueous streams: NaCl solutions and artificial seawater at voltages ranging from 0.6 V to 1.2 V.
The output of the desalination was calculated using formula (1).
η ( % ) = C i C f C i × 100
where:
  • η —desalination yield.
  • C i —initial conductivity of the feed stream.
  • C f —conductivity at the output of the CDI module.
The charging cycle of the desalination process was the only one tested. Thus, at an optimum water flow of 1.5 L/h, the experimental CDI module could perform desalination for up to 2 h.
The ionic conductivity of the test solution was approx. 35 mS. As is shown in Figure 22 and Figure 23, the desalination process occurs almost instantly when the water passes through the CDI module.
Ionic conductivity dropped by up to 5–8 mS in the first hour of the operation in the case of the NaCl test solution and by up to 65 µS in the case of the artificial seawater. Furthermore, the deionization/desalination process took longer in the case of artificial seawater (180 min until saturation) than in the case of the NaCl solution (120 min until saturation).
Therefore, the CDI module is thought to operate optimally for multicomponent aqueous mixtures (seawater case). After the first hour of operation, the ionic conductivity of the outlet effluent began to gradually increase until saturation was reached.
The process took about 2 h for a 3 L water volume to attain saturation (roughly 1.5 L per hour). The 1 V supply voltage is considered to be optimal.
Under these conditions, the estimated energy consumption is:
W = P × t = U × I × t   Wh
  • W energy consumption, Wh
  • U voltage, V
  • I recorded electrical current, mA: I = 290 mA
  • t time, h
W = 1   V × 0.290   A × 2   h = 2.29   Wh
and, current density:
J = dI dS   [ A / m 2 ]
where, the total geometrical surface of the electrodes, S = 0.132 m2
J = dI dS = 290   mA 0.132   m 2 = 2.196   A / m 2
Table 5 shows that the desalination yields varied between 63.63% and 99.09% percent depending on the supply voltage and the type of solution tested (mono or multicomponent).

4. Conclusions

This study aimed to demonstrate that materials such as carbon nanowhiskers-derived organic gels have real potential to be used in CDI applications. Carbon whiskers have never been used as electrode materials in CDI, as far as we know. These structures were generated using the same chemical processing path as carbon xerogels, rather than a plasma-controlled environment or any other commonly used physical method. In this regard, the processing method of the carbon whiskers will tend to reflect the cost of electrode manufacture, becoming cost effective. Laboratory trials confirmed that carbon nanowhiskers can compete from an operational perspective with well-known porous carbon xerogels. Given the high desalination yield of 99.09% obtained when using artificial seawater solutions, the desalination rate experimental trials have shown that the CDI module-based carbon whiskers are expected to work best with multi-component aqueous solutions or concentrated streams. The research is still ongoing to improve the electrode’s efficiency and surface area by refining the factors responsible for the electrode’s functional properties and to reach more reliable results for water desalination.

5. Patents

RO129080B1 Process for Preparing A Composite Carbonic Material for Capacitive Desalinization of Sea Water, Hristea Gabriela, Lipcinski Daniel, Militaru Adrian Gigi.

Author Contributions

G.H. performed the synthesis of the RF organogels and the carbon xerogel electrodes, carried out the surface area measurements, assisted with the analysis and design of the experiments, supported the design of the CDI module and wrote the first draft of the paper; M.I. performed the electrochemical experiments, provided the guidance for the analysis and the design of the experiments, and analyzed the experimental data; A.C. performed the electrical measurements and analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, Program NUCLEU, Contract PN 0935-0302/2010 “Seawater desalination. Hybrid system of capacitive deionization type and electrochemical water purification coupled with hall type effect desalination system”, signed with National R&D Institute for Electrical Engineering ICPE-CA and bilateral project JINR-RO, Project No. 71 of JINR Order 365/11.05.21 and No. 70 of JINR Order 366/11.05.21, Theme code: 03-4-1128-2017/2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Lucia Leonat and the Organic Chemistry Laboratory within the Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science-Bucharest, UPB, Romania, for contribution to the scanning electron microscopies; Daniel Lipcinski and Militaru Adrian Gigi for technical assistance in CDI construction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Zuo, K.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Liang, P. Selective ion separation by capacitive deionization (CDI) based technologies: A state-of-the-art review. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, C.; He, D.; Ma, J.; Tang, W.; Waite, T. Faradaic reactions in capacitive deionization (CDI)–problems and possibilities: A review. Water Res. 2018, 128, 314–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, W.; Liang, J.; He, D.; Gong, J.; Tang, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, D.; Zeng, G. Various cell architectures of capacitive deionization: Recent advances and future trends. Water Res. 2019, 150, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Biesheuvel, P.M. Thermodynamic cycle analysis for capacitive deionization. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 332, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Suss, M.E.; Baumann, T.F.; Bourcier, W.L.; Spadaccini, C.M.; Rose, K.A.; Santiago, J.G.; Staderman, M. Capacitive desalination with flow-through electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9511–9519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, P.; Drewes, J.E.; Heil, D.; Wang, G. Treatment of brackish produced water using carbon aerogel-based capacitive deionization technology. Water Res. 2008, 42, 2605–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pekala, R.W.; Farmer, J.C.; Alviso, C.V.; Tran, T.D.; Mayer, S.T.; Miller, J.M.; Dunn, B. Carbon aerogels for electrochemical applications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 225, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gabelich, C.J.; Tran, T.D.; Suffet, I.H.M. Electrosorption of inorganic salts from aqueous solution using carbon aerogels. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3010–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, C.-M.; Choi, W.-H.; Na, B.-K.; Cho, B.W.; Cho, W.I. Capacitive deionization of NaCl solution with carbon aerogel-silica gel composite electrodes. Desalination 2005, 174, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hou, C.-H.; Liang, C.; Yiacoumi, S.; Dai, S.; Tsouris, C. Electrosorption capacitance of nanostructured carbon-based materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 302, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wu, C.; Luo, L.; Wang, C.; Huang, S.; Xu, H. A study of the effect of carbon characteristics on capacitive deionization (CDI) performance. Desalination 2018, 433, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tong, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, X.; Zhao, C.; Liu, P. Advances in efficient desalination technology of capacitive deionization for water recycling. Water Reuse 2021, 11, 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Preparation, structure, and electrochemical properties of reduced graphene sheet films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 2782–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, D.; Wen, X.; Shi, L.; Yan, T.; Zhang, J. Enhanced capacitive deionization of graphene/mesoporous carbon composites. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5440–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sui, Z.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ma, R.; Cao, B. Green synthesis of carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid aerogels and their use as versatile agents for water purification. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8767–8771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yin, H.; Zhao, S.; Wan, J.; Tang, H.; Chang, L.; He, L.; Zhao, H.; Gao, Y.; Tang, Z. Three-dimensional graphene/metal oxide nanoparticle hybrids for high-performance capacitive deionization of saline water. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 6270–6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alam, M.; Seyed, A.S.; Ghaani, M.R. Performance evaluation of optimized carbon xerogel electrode in desalination through flow-electrode capacitive deionization: Capacitance optimization by response surface methodology. Desalination Water Treat. 2019, 145, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zou, L.; Morris, G.; Qi, D. Using activated carbon electrode in electrosorptive deionisation of brackish water. Desalination 2008, 225, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, L.; Song, H.; Chen, X. Ordered mesoporous carbons from the carbonization of sulfuric-acid-treated silica/triblock copolymer/sucrose composites. J. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2006, 94, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Y.; Chen, N.; Li, Z.; Shao, H.; Qu, L. Frontiers of carbon materials as capacitive deionization electrodes. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 5006–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Z.; Qin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Shen, J. Preparation of Carbon Aerogel Electrode for Electrosorption of Copper Ions in Aqueous Solution. Materials 2019, 12, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xue, H.; Fu, Y.J.; Luo, A.Y.; Shen, J.; Wu, G.M.; Zhou, B. Research Progress of Carbon Aerogels and Their Application in Deionization. Mater. Rev. 2006, 20, 137–139. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, D.; Shen, J.; Li, Y.J. Pore Structures of Carbon Aerogels and Their Effects on Electrochemical Supercapacitor Performance. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 843–849. [Google Scholar]
  24. Farmer, J.F.; Fix, D.V.; Mack, G.V.; Pekala, R.W.; Poco, J.F. Capacitive, deionization with carbon aerogel electrodes: Carbonate, sulfate, and phosphate. In Proceedings of the International Technical Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE): Diversity into the Next Century, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 9–12 October 1995. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, S.J.; Hwang, S.W.; Hyun, S.H. Preparation of carbon aerogel electrodes for supercapacitor and their electrochemical characteristics. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hwang, S.W.; Hyun, S.H. Capacitance control of carbon aerogel electrodes. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2004, 347, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Son, M.; Cho, K.H.; Jeong, K.; Park, J. Membrane and Electrochemical Processes for Water Desalination: A Short Perspective and the Role of Nanotechnology. Membranes 2020, 10, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, X.; Omosebi, A.; Landon, J.; Liu, K. Enhanced salt removal in an inverted capacitive deionization cell using amine modified microporous carbon cathodes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 10920–10926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cohen, I.; Avraham, E.; Noked, M.; Soffer, A.; Aurbach, D. Surface-treated carbon electrodes with modified potential of zero charge for capacitive deionization. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 19856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, T.; Wang, G.; Dong, Q.; Qian, J.; Meng, Y.; Qiu, J. Asymmetric capacitive deionization utilizing nitric acid treated activated carbon fiber as the cathode. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Omosebi, A.; Gao, X.; Rentschler, J.; Landon, J.; Liu, K. Continuous operation of membrane capacitive deionization cells assembled with dissimilar potential of zero charge electrode pairs. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 446, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qian, B.; Wang, G.; Ling, Z.; Dong, Q.; Wu, T.; Zhang, X.; Qiu, J. Sulfonated graphene as cation-selective coating: A new strategy for high-performance membrane capacitive deionization. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 2, 1500372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, X.; Porada, S.; Omosebi, A.; Liu, K.L.; Biesheuvel, P.M.; Landon, J. Complementary surface charge for enhanced capacitive deionization. Water Res. 2016, 92, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Su, X.; Kulik, H.J.; Jamison, T.F.; Hatton, T.A. Anion-Selective Redox Electrodes: Electrochemically Mediated Separation with Heterogeneous Organometallic Interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 3394–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, P.; Wang, H.; Yan, T.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D. Grafting sulfonic and amine functional groups on 3D graphene for improved capacitive deionization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 5303–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Z.Y.; Jin, L.J.; Lu, G.Q.; Xiao, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.X.; Jing, L.; Zhang, X.X.; Yan, Y.M.; Sun, K.N. Sponge-templated preparation of high surface area graphene with ultrahigh capacitive deionization performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 3917–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arulrajan, A.C.; Ramasamy, D.L.; Sillanpää, M.; van der Wal, A.; Biesheuvel, P.M.; Porada, S.; Dykstra, J.E. Exceptional Water Desalination Performance with Anion-Selective Electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1806937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kliestik, T.; Nica, E.; Musa, H.; Poliak, M.; Mihai, E.-A. Networked, Smart, and Responsive Devices in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems, Economics. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nefzi, N. Fear of Failure and Entrepreneurial Risk Perception. Int. J. Entrep. Knowl. 2018, 6, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maroušek, J.; Maroušková, A.; Zoubek, T.; Bartoš, P. Economic impacts of soil fertility degradation by traces of iron from drinking water treatment. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stávková, J.; Maroušek, J. Novel sorbent shows promising financial results on P recovery from sludge water. Chemosphere 2021, 276, 130097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choi, D.; Yeom, H.J.; You, K.H.; Kim, J.H.; Seong, D.J.; Yoon, E.; Lee, H.-C. Generation of carbon nanowhiskers, nanotips, and nanodots by controlling plasma environment: Ion energy and radical effects. Carbon 2020, 162, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, N.; Kim, C.; Yoon, J. Enhancing the Desalination Performance of Capacitive Deionization Using a Layered Double Hydroxide Coated Activated Carbon Electrode. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Al-Muhtaseb, S.A.; Ritter, J.A. Preparation and properties of resorcinol–formaldehyde organic and carbon gels. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tamon, H.; Ishizaka, H.; Mikami, M.; Okazaki, M. Porous structure of organic and carbon aerogels synthesized by sol–gel polycondensation of resorcinol with formaldehyde. Carbon 1997, 35, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tamon, H.; Ishizaka, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Suzuki, T. Preparation of mesoporous carbon by freeze drying. Carbon 1999, 37, 2049–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yamamoto, T.; Nishimura, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tamon, H. Control of mesoporosity of carbon gels prepared by sol-gel polycondensation and freeze drying. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2001, 288, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Feng, J.; Zhang, C. Shrinkage and pore structure in preparation of carbon aerogels. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2011, 59, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Feng, Y.; Ge, L.; Jiang, B.; Miao, L.; Masaki, T. Reactant Concentration and Carbonization to the Controllable Fabrication of Carbon Aerogels. Mater. Sci. Forum 2013, 744, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mulik, S.; Sotiriou-Leventis, C.; Leventis, N. Time-Efficient Acid-Catalyzed Synthesis of Resorcinol—Formaldehyde Aerogels. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 6138–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Wang, X.; Gamboa, S.; Huang, Q.; Gamboa, S.; Sebastian, P.J. Studies on preparation and performances of carbon aerogel electrodes for the application of supercapacitor. J. Power Sources 2006, 158, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Macías, C.; Lavela, P.; Rasines, G.; Zafra, M.C.; Tirado, J.L.; Ania, C.O. On the correlation between the porous structure and the electrochemical response of powdered and monolithic carbon aerogels as electrodes for capacitive deionization. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 242, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lu, S.; Guo, H.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jin, Z.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Y. The monolithic carbon aerogels and aerogel composites for electronics and thermal protection applications. AIP Conf. Proc. Am. Inst. Phys. 2017, 1884, 030004. [Google Scholar]
  54. Thommes, M.; Cychosz, K.A. Physical adsorption characterization of nanoporous materials: Progress and challenges. Adsorption 2014, 20, 233–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Leu, I.-C.; Hon, M.-H. Nucleation behavior of silicon carbide whiskers grown by chemical vapor deposition. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 236, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bacon, R. Growth, Structure, and Properties of Graphite Whiskers. J. Appl. Phys. 1960, 31, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fonseca, A.; Hernadi, K.; Piedigrosso, P.; Colomer, J.-F.; Mukhopadhyay, K.; Doome, R.; Lazarescu, S.; Biró, L.P.; Lambin, P.; Thiry, P.; et al. Synthesis of single- and multi-wall carbon nanotubes over supported catalysts. Appl. Phys. A 1998, 67, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Suss, M.E.; Porada, S.; Sun, X.; Biesheuvel, P.M.; Yoon, J.; Presser, V. Water desalination via capacitive deionization: What is it and what can we expect from it. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2296–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Anderson, M.; Cudero, L.; Jesus, A.; Jesus, P. Capacitive deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy and delivering clean water. Comparison to present desalination practices: Will it compete? Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 3845–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the overall CX sheets electrodes synthesis process.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the overall CX sheets electrodes synthesis process.
Materials 14 04932 g001
Figure 2. Polycondensation reaction of resorcinol with formaldehyde.
Figure 2. Polycondensation reaction of resorcinol with formaldehyde.
Materials 14 04932 g002
Figure 3. The general mechanism for the development of RF gel networks. Adapted from S.A. Al-Muhtaseb [44].
Figure 3. The general mechanism for the development of RF gel networks. Adapted from S.A. Al-Muhtaseb [44].
Materials 14 04932 g003
Figure 4. CX Variant X2 (after gel impregnation in the carbon felt and pyrolysis): (a) Adsorption isotherm; (b) BET plot; (c) Pore volume distribution; (d) Pore volume histogram.
Figure 4. CX Variant X2 (after gel impregnation in the carbon felt and pyrolysis): (a) Adsorption isotherm; (b) BET plot; (c) Pore volume distribution; (d) Pore volume histogram.
Materials 14 04932 g004
Figure 5. Variant X4 (after gel impregnation in carbon felt and pyrolysis): (a) Adsorption isotherm; (b) BET plot; (c) Pore volume distribution; (d) Pore volume histogram.
Figure 5. Variant X4 (after gel impregnation in carbon felt and pyrolysis): (a) Adsorption isotherm; (b) BET plot; (c) Pore volume distribution; (d) Pore volume histogram.
Materials 14 04932 g005
Figure 6. Appearance of RF gels: (a) R/C = 500, (b) R/C = 200.
Figure 6. Appearance of RF gels: (a) R/C = 500, (b) R/C = 200.
Materials 14 04932 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy of the X2 variant (RF gel impregnated in carbon felt followed by pyrolysis).
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy of the X2 variant (RF gel impregnated in carbon felt followed by pyrolysis).
Materials 14 04932 g007
Figure 8. Carbon nanowhiskers. Variant X4 (RF gel impregnated in carbon felt after pyrolysis).
Figure 8. Carbon nanowhiskers. Variant X4 (RF gel impregnated in carbon felt after pyrolysis).
Materials 14 04932 g008
Figure 9. Various morphologies of CX: (a,c) scanning electron microscopy of the CX electrode X2 variant; (b,d) scanning electron microscopy of CX type nanowhiskers electrode—X4 variant; (e) optical micrograph of the electrode surface × 300.
Figure 9. Various morphologies of CX: (a,c) scanning electron microscopy of the CX electrode X2 variant; (b,d) scanning electron microscopy of CX type nanowhiskers electrode—X4 variant; (e) optical micrograph of the electrode surface × 300.
Materials 14 04932 g009
Figure 10. Nyquist plots for the X1 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 10. Nyquist plots for the X1 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g010
Figure 11. Bode plots for the X1 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 11. Bode plots for the X1 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g011
Figure 12. Nyquist plots for the X2 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 12. Nyquist plots for the X2 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g012
Figure 13. Bode plots for the X2 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 13. Bode plots for the X2 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g013
Figure 14. Nyquist plots for the X3 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 14. Nyquist plots for the X3 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g014
Figure 15. Bode plots for the X3 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 15. Bode plots for the X3 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g015
Figure 16. Nyquist plots for the X4 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 16. Nyquist plots for the X4 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g016
Figure 17. Nyquist (zoom) plots for the X4 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 17. Nyquist (zoom) plots for the X4 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g017
Figure 18. Bode plots for the X4 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Figure 18. Bode plots for the X4 variant in NaCl: 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.1M.
Materials 14 04932 g018
Figure 19. Schematic configuration of one CDI cell.
Figure 19. Schematic configuration of one CDI cell.
Materials 14 04932 g019
Figure 20. Cross image of the CDI stack module-based CX type nanowhisker electrodes.
Figure 20. Cross image of the CDI stack module-based CX type nanowhisker electrodes.
Materials 14 04932 g020
Figure 21. Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up of the laboratory CDI system.
Figure 21. Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up of the laboratory CDI system.
Materials 14 04932 g021
Figure 22. Variation of ionic conductivity of the NaCl test solution during the charge cycle.
Figure 22. Variation of ionic conductivity of the NaCl test solution during the charge cycle.
Materials 14 04932 g022
Figure 23. Variation of the ionic conductivity of the artificial sea water test solution during the charge cycle.
Figure 23. Variation of the ionic conductivity of the artificial sea water test solution during the charge cycle.
Materials 14 04932 g023
Table 1. Synthesis parameters for RF carbon xerogels.
Table 1. Synthesis parameters for RF carbon xerogels.
Reagents
Molar Ratio
Temperature of
Pyrolysis Process,
(°C)
Organic Gel/
Carbon Xerogel
SBET
(m2·g−1)
R/C = 20
R/F = 0.5
800RF gel
CX
7.25 × 10
1.03 × 102
R/C = 200
R/F = 0.5
800RF gel
CX
4.23 × 10
1.55 × 102
R/C = 20
R/F = 0.5
950RF gel
CX
7.25 × 10
2.45 × 102
R/C = 200
R/F = 0.5
950RF gel
CX
2.85 × 10
3.85 × 102
Table 2. The synthesis parameters of carbon xerogels.
Table 2. The synthesis parameters of carbon xerogels.
VariantpHR/CD
(Dilution Ratio)
Na2CO3
(g)
SBET (m2·g−1)
RF Gels
after Pyrolysis
SBET (m2·g−1))
Carbon Felt Impregnated with RF Gels
after Pyrolysis
X15.510000.910.035290310
X26.045000.950.077267595
X37.55200.960.773209485
X46.8510001.800.031315887
Table 3. EIS parameters for X1, X2, X3, and X4 CX-based electrode variants.
Table 3. EIS parameters for X1, X2, X3, and X4 CX-based electrode variants.
VariantElectrolyteRel, kΩ·cm2Rp, kΩ·cm2Cdl, μF/cm2
X1NaCl 0.5M1.54 × 10−3100.5158.3
NaCl 0.25M86.9 × 10−3460.469.13
NaCl 0.1M39.9 × 10−3851.511.81
X2NaCl 0.5M8.93 × 10−341.65603.6
NaCl 0.25M215 × 10−3140.6226.3
NaCl 0.1M8.76 × 10−3111.471.39
X3NaCl 0.5M13.4 × 10−344.44716.1
NaCl 0.25M42.19 × 10−3377.284.38
NaCl 0.1M56.9 × 10−3461.369
X4NaCl 0.5M5.57 × 10−332 × 10−3777.9
NaCl 0.25M28.1 × 10−372.68437.9
NaCl 0.1M3.71 × 10−31158.8
Table 4. Artificial sea water composition.
Table 4. Artificial sea water composition.
ComponentMolecular Weightg/L
NaCl58.4423.936
Na2SO4142.044.008
KCl74.560.677
NaHCO3840.196
KBr119.010.098
H3BO361.830.026
NaF41.990.003
Molecular weightMol/L solutionConcentration
MgCl2 × 6H2O203.330.053271.0 M
CaCl2 × 2H2O147.030.010331.0 M
SrCl × 6H2O266.640.000090.1 M
Table 5. CDI module desalination yields for the test solution at different applied voltages.
Table 5. CDI module desalination yields for the test solution at different applied voltages.
NaCl
Solution
Artificial Sea Water
Voltage,
V
Desalination Yield,
%
Voltage,
V
Desalination Yield,
%
1.263.631.299.09
1.76.471.96.12
0.884.850.886.65
0.679.310.685.62
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hristea, G.; Iordoc, M.; Culcea, A. Nanocarbon Type Xerogel Materials Designed for Water Desalination. Materials 2021, 14, 4932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174932

AMA Style

Hristea G, Iordoc M, Culcea A. Nanocarbon Type Xerogel Materials Designed for Water Desalination. Materials. 2021; 14(17):4932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hristea, Gabriela, Mihai Iordoc, and Andreea Culcea. 2021. "Nanocarbon Type Xerogel Materials Designed for Water Desalination" Materials 14, no. 17: 4932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174932

APA Style

Hristea, G., Iordoc, M., & Culcea, A. (2021). Nanocarbon Type Xerogel Materials Designed for Water Desalination. Materials, 14(17), 4932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174932

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop