Next Article in Journal
Research on Flashover Prediction Method of Large-Space Timber Structures in a Fire
Next Article in Special Issue
Laboratory Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Modified Asphalt and Mixture Using Graphene Platelets (GnPs)
Previous Article in Journal
Screen Printed Antennas on Fiber-Based Substrates for Sustainable HF RFID Assisted E-Fulfilment Smart Packaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical and Structural Changes by Gold Addition Using Recharge Method in NiW/Al2O3-CeO2-TiO2 Nanomaterials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/ma14195503
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polystyrene-Fe3O4-MWCNTs Nanocomposites for Toluene Removal from Water

by
Thamer Adnan Abdullah
1,2,
Tatjána Juzsakova
1,
Rashed Taleb Rasheed
2,
Ali Dawood Salman
1,
Viktor Sebestyen
1,
Endre Domokos
1,
Brindusa Sluser
3,* and
Igor Cretescu
3,*
1
Sustainability Solutions Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprém, Hungary
2
Chemistry Branch, Applied Sciences Department, University of Technology, Baghdad 10001, Iraq
3
Faculty Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 73, Blvd. D. Mangeron, 700050 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(19), 5503; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195503
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 5 September 2021 / Accepted: 8 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Applications of Nanoparticles)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this research, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were functionalized by oxidation with strong acids HNO3, H2SO4, and H2O2. Then, magnetite/MWCNTs nanocomposites were prepared and polystyrene was added to prepare polystyrene/MWCNTs/magnetite (PS:MWCNTs:Fe) nanocomposites. The magnetic property of the prepared nano-adsorbent PS:MWCNTs:Fe was successfully checked. For characterization, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and BET surface area were used to determine the structure, morphology, chemical nature, functional groups, and surface area with pore volume of the prepared nano-adsorbents. The adsorption procedures were carried out for fresh MWCNTs, oxidized MWCNTs, MWCNTs-Fe, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites in batch experiments. Toluene standard was used to develop the calibration curve. The results of toluene adsorption experiments exhibited that the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nonabsorbent achieved the highest removal efficiency and adsorption capacity of toluene removal. The optimum parameters for toluene removal from water were found to be 60 min, 2 mg nano-sorbent dose, pH of 5, solution temperature of 35 °C at 50 mL volume, toluene concentration of 50 mg/L, and shaking speed of 240 rpm. The adsorption kinetic study of toluene followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics, with the best correlation (R2) value of 0.998, while the equilibrium adsorption study showed that the Langmuir isotherm was obeyed, which suggested that the adsorption is a monolayer and homogenous.

1. Introduction

Though water makes up three-quarters of the world, the availability of water that is safe enough for human consumption is less than 1%, which leaves a large population living with inadequate drinking water [1]. Naturally available fresh water is regularly contaminated by a number of anthropogenic activities and industrial processes. The significant increase in population growth has led to enormous industrial applications, which results in the release of organic pollutants, especially from manufacturing industries [2]. The most frequently encountered organic pollutants include toluene, dyes, and oil spills. Toluene is used as a manufacturing component to produce polymer, rubber, medicine, dyes, inks, benzene, and explosives. Byproducts of these productions are mainly discharged into the atmosphere and have severely polluted the water. The consistent release of toluene into the atmosphere and surface water has equally negatively impacted the health of humans, animals, and the aquatic system. The major health hazards due to the exposure of toluene include central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction and narcosis [3]. Additionally, due to the persistent contact with water, toluene forms toxic compounds that are injurious to human health [4].
The common existing treatment procedures for depollution of contaminated water include electrochemical oxidation, biological processes, adsorption, photocatalysis, gravity separation, etc. [5,6]. These techniques usually suffer from limitations, such as poor separation efficiency, time-consuming, and higher energy costs, and sometimes lead to secondary pollution, i.e., generating waste [7]. Similarly, there are a number of membrane techniques used for oil–water separation, including reverse osmosis, nano-filtration, and ultra-filtration [8]. Though membrane technology is highly efficient and has low energy consumption, they are not suitable for oil–water separation because they require extra energy, chemicals, and funds for cleaning the membrane [9]. The situation has motivated quite a large number of researchers to develop efficient and alternative methods that are environmentally friendly.
The applications of nanotechnology have brought a considerable revolution in materials science, and researchers have flocked to it because of the impeccable properties shown by nanomaterials, such as higher sorption rate, super-hydrophobicity, super-oleophilicity, and greater mechanical strength [10]. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), compared with other nanomaterials, have shown a relatively higher affinity of adsorption for removal of volatile organic compounds, as reported by Parmar et al. [11], for the removal of heavy metal ions [12] and for the degradation of dyes [13]. Likewise, nowadays, MWCNTs are considered as potential adsorbents for numerous remediation applications, especially in the environmental field, including removal of organic pollutants and heavy metals from aqueous media [14,15]. The synthesis methods for carbon nanotubes’ (CNTs) preparation are usually selected in light of the required suitable properties and the specific field of application where these synthesized nanomaterials will be used.
The use of nanocomposites in removing organic pollutants such as toluene is more preferable to other similar methods, including membrane separation, in one way or another [16]. This is attributed to a number of characteristic features possessed by these nanocomposites, as narrated by Hu et al., such as low density, electrical conductivity, large specific surface area, high inherent strength, higher adsorption capacity, good hydrophobicity, thermal and chemical stability, high aspect ratio, fast adsorption rate, oleophilic characteristics, and hydrogen storage capacity [17]. These properties have been confirmed by Wang et al. [18].
Tan et al. have successfully developed an environmentally friendly adsorbent on raw corn straw after deposition of SiO2/ZnO nanocomposite particles, with excellent super-oleophilic and super-hydrophobic characteristics [19]. Cao et al., based on their research, have reported that the titania/carbon nanotube composite (TiO2/CNT) has shown enhanced absorption for the removal of organic pollutants in comparison to pure TiO2 nanoparticles [20]. Similarly, Sobhanardakani and Zandipak, in 2018, reported on functionalized silica-coated magnetite nanocomposites for removing organic pollutants from a water solution [21]. Kirti et al. exploited the biomass functionality in iron nanocomposites for the potential removal of four dyes, which included both anionic and cationic dyes [22]. Parangusan et al. reported the fabrication of membrane oil absorbents based on carbon nanotube-reinforced polystyrene nanocomposites by an electrospinning technique [23]. Rekos et al. prepared magnetic nanocomposite adsorbents by impregnating graphene oxide with three different polymers, i.e., chitosan, polystyrene, and polyaniline, for the removal of a typical endocrine disruptor, bisphenol-A, from aqueous solutions [24]. A new adsorbent based on silica gel impregnated with deep eutectic solvents (DESs) was prepared to increase the adsorption efficiency of toluene and other organic compounds [25].
In this article, MWCNTs were treated with strong acids for the oxidation process (ox-MWCNTs), at first by strong acids (HNO3, H2SO4) followed by H2O2. Two solutions, Fe+3:FeCl3.6H2O and Fe+2:FeSO4.7H2O, were used to prepare magnetite (Fe3O4) over ox-MWCNTs for the formation of magnetite/MWCNTs (MWCNTs-Fe) nanocomposites. Then, polystyrene (PS) was added to the mixture in order to prepare the final polystyrene:multi-walled carbon nanotubes:magnetite (PS:MWCNTs:Fe) nanocomposites with a PS to MWCNTs:Fe weight (wt) ratio of 1:3. Many researchers have prepared polymer:MWCNTs or magnetite for water treatment [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Researchers used to add a small amount of CNT-based polymer to prepare the superhydrophobic sorbent. In our work, we prepared a nano-sorbent based on CNTs, and we successfully improved their sorption ability for toluene removal. Two references were added. The removal of toluene from water by adsorption was carried out for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, MWCNTs-Fe, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe. The results of the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites indicated the highest adsorption capacity and the highest removal efficiency of toluene compared with other Fe-MWCNTs and ox-MWCNTs nanocomposites.

2. Materials and Methods

The chemicals and standard samples that were used for the current research are provided in this section with brief and specific details. Nitric acid (HNO3, 99%; from Merck Chemicals Co. Budapest, Hungary), polystyrene (99%; from Merck Chemicals Co. Budapest, Hungary), cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB, C19H42BrN, 99%; from Merck Chemicals Co. Budapest, Hungary), iron tetrachloride (Fe+3: FeCl3.6H2O; 99%; from Merck Chemicals Co. Budapest, Hungary), iron sulfate (Fe+2: FeSO4.7H2O; 99.7%; Merck Chemicals Co. Budapest, Hungary), hydrochloric acid (HCl; 99.7%; VWR Chemicals BDH Co.Debrecen, Hungary), sodium hydroxide (NaOH; 99%; VWR Chemicals BDH Co. Debrecen, Hungary), and commercial grade MWCNTs samples (TNNF-6 type; Times Nano China, made by the chemical vapor deposition technique (CVD)) were used.

2.1. Synthesis of Polystyrene:MWCNTs:Magnetite Nanocomposites (PS:MWCNTs:Fe)

Fresh MWCNTs were oxidized by adding two strong acids, i.e., H2SO4 and HNO3, in a ratio of 3:1, respectively. The solution was subjected to ultrasonication for 6 h followed by MWCNTs washing, and the solution was filtered. After that, H2O2 was added, and the solution was again ultrasonicated for the second oxidation process to make sure that the MWCNTs were completely oxidized (ox-MWCNTs) and the carboxyl group was generated [31,32]. Then, the ox-MWCNTs were washed until a pH near 7 was achieved. The ox-MWCNTs were dried at 90 °C overnight. Fe3O4/MWCNTs (MWCNTs-Fe) nanocomposites were prepared by using the following process: Two solutions, Fe+3:FeCl3.6H2O and Fe+2:FeSO4.7H2O, having a molar ratio of 2:1 respectively, were mixed. In order to avoid the agglomeration of magnetite formation, CTAB was added to the mixture of iron salts. MWCNTs were added to the mixture along with continuous stirring at 40 °C until the solution became the same as clay. Nitrogen gas was passed during the process to prevent the oxidation of Fe+2 to Fe+3. An ammonium hydroxide solution was added to the mixture dropwise, and the addition was stopped when the pH of the solution was 10. The final MWCNTs-Fe were washed and dried at 50 °C using a vacuum oven for 12 h [33].
Chloroform was used for the dissolution of polystyrene. At first, 100 mg of Fe-MWCNTs/L of chloroform was sonicated at 50 °C for 1 h. Then, polystyrene was added to the mixture in a 1:3 PS:Fe-MWCNTs weight ratio. The mixture was sonicated for a further 3 h. The mixture was then mixed with a magnetic stirrer for 24 h at 40 °C using a hot plate [34]. The final PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites were formed. The sample was separated, washed, and then dried at 50 °C overnight. The magnetic property was successfully achieved in the prepared nano-sorbent (PS:MWCNTs:Fe). Figure 1 presents the schematic flow chart for the preparation of the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites.

2.2. Adsorption Experimental Work

Adsorption experiments were carried out in a batch process. The stock solution was first prepared for the adsorption tests. Standard toluene was used to prepare the solution with a concentration of 200 mg/L in deionized distilled water. The stock solution was ultrasonicated for 1 h and then mixed for 24 h at ambient temperature. Before each batch experiment, the solution was sonicated for 30 min. The batch volume was 50 mL, taken in a 100 mL glass conical flask, and then 2 mg of adsorbent was added. After adding the nano-sorbent, the conical flask containing the solution was transferred to a shaker with a speed of 240 rpm. A number of important parameters were measured experimentally, including the range of time, different sorbent weights, different solution temperatures, and different pH values. The magnetic field was successfully used for the separation process [33,34]. A magnet was used after each batch experiment for nano-sorbent separation. A schematic figure of the oil removal process can be seen in Figure 2.
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Knauer, Germany System) (C 18, Bond pack 3 μm, (25 cm, 4.6 mm)) was used to measure the concentration of toluene after each experiment. The toluene stock solution was used as a blank without the addition of the nano-sorbent, to ensure that the loss of toluene concentration is not related to the volatility of toluene or the adsorption of toluene on the wall of the conical glass. The toluene removal efficiency and adsorption capacity were calculated using Equations (1) and (2) [35]:
Percentage removal (%) = [(Co − Ct)/Co] × 100
where Co = initial toluene concentration, mg/L, and Ct = final kerosene concentration, mg/L.
qt = (Co − Ct)V/W
where V = volume of solution, L, W = weight of prepared metal oxides, g, and qt = final adsorption of toluene.
In order to achieve a calibration standard curve for toluene, the standard toluene solutions were prepared at different concentrations, i.e., 10, 25, 50, and 100 ppm. Toluene concentrations were found using HPLC. The toluene standard calibration curve is shown in Figure 3, which is plotted as the function of toluene concentrations against the area under the peak achieved through HPLC.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization Results

3.1.1. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra for all prepared samples. The 3425 and 1625 cm−1 bands belong to water, while the bending vibrations at 2925, 2845, 1460, and 1395 cm−1 are attributed to the C–H stretching mode of the aromatic ring, C–H stretching in the branches, C=C aromatic ring stretching, and C–C stretching for the MWCNTs, respectively. After acid treatment, MWCNTs (ox-MWCNTs) and the generation of a carboxyl group could have resulted in the formation of bands at 3420, 1490, and 1400 cm−1 related to the stretching vibration of the O–H group in carboxylic acid and the vibration of the C=O carboxyl and C–O stretching bond of free –COOH groups, respectively. The improvement in the peak height at 720 cm−1 for Fe-MWCNTs in Figure 4 confirms that the metal oxide (Fe–O) was bonded onto oxygen in the carboxylic groups through the –COO– magnetite bonds. After the adsorption process of toluene using PS:MWCNTs:Fe in Figure 4, the improved peaks at 2925 and 2845 cm−1 are indicative of the C-H stretching mode of the aromatic ring and the C–H stretching in the –CH3 in toluene, respectively. The FTIR bands appearing at 1035 and 545 cm−1 are attributed to in-plane and out-of-plane C–H bending, respectively [23,34,35,36]. Table 1 shows the peak assignments and type of vibration for all prepared sorbents [37].

3.1.2. X-ray Diffraction Investigations

X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra provide information about the structure of MWCNTs, as presented in Figure 5 (the diffraction patterns). In the case of fresh MWCNTs, they show the main peaks at (002), (100), and (101), appearing at 25.9, 43, and 44°, respectively [35,38,39]. There is no change in the structure of the MWCNTs after oxidation using strong acids, as can be seen in Figure 5. When Fe3O4 is added to the MWCNTs, the main peaks at (220), (311), (400), (511), and (440) correspond to 31.42, 44.53, 53.35, 57.01, and 63.11°, respectively [40,41]. The XRD patterns for PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites show a very small intensity peak at 19.4°, which belong to a very low polystyrene content [36], in comparison with MWCNTs and Fe3O4.

3.1.3. Raman Spectroscopy Investigations

Raman spectroscopy analysis was used to characterize the fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, PS:MWCNTs:Fe, and toluene adsorption-MWCNTs. There are three sharp peaks at 1338, 1580, and 2635 cm−1 in all samples, which correspond to the disorder-induced band (D band), the Raman allowed tangential mode (G band), and the second-order harmonic band G’ (Graphite) band, attributed to the overtone of the D and G bands, respectively [42,43,44]. The Raman spectrum shows a second-order harmonic band G’ (Graphite) at 2635 cm−1 corresponding to the D + G bands. In the case of oxidized MWCNTs (ox-MWCNTs) and then modified with magnetite (Fe-MWCNTs), which is represented in Figure 6, the D, G, and G’ were changed, and then after adding polystyrene to the Fe-MWCNTs and PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites formed, the D, G, and G’ bands were significantly improved. This is related to bonding of the polymer in Fe-MWCNTs. The Raman spectrum was performed for PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites after toluene adsorption, as can be seen in Figure 6, where the enhancement of peaks’ resolution leads to another band issued at 4150 cm−1 that refers to toluene adsorption on the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites.

3.1.4. Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy Investigations

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images for the prepared nanocomposites are shown in Figure 7. Taking into consideration that the magnetite nanoparticles were prepared over MWCNTs in a ratio of 1:1, it was pointed out according to Figure 7a,b that Fe3O4 particles prepared over MWCNTs were well within the nanoscale, and the shapes were found to be nanotubes; hence, it is clear that there are no effects on the shape of the carbon nanotubes during oxidation of the MWCNTs with a strong acid and even after the magnetite/MWCNTs nanocomposites’ preparation. After modification of MWCNTs/magnetite with the polymer, PS:MWCNTs:Fe has been very clearly shown in Figure 7c,d, pointing out that the mixing of polystyrene during the nanocomposites’ preparation helps the agglomeration of the MWCNTs and magnetite particles. The TEM images in Figure 8a,b show MWCNTs-magnetite nanocomposites. The images indicate that there is no effect on the tubular shape of the CNTs during the preparation and when the magnetite nanoparticles appear over the MWCNTs. Figure 8b shows that the magnetite nanoparticle diameter is less than 10 nm. Figure 8c,d show the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites, from which it was also observed that the agglomerations of the magnetite particles occur after the addition of polystyrene. Similarly, the tubular shape of the CNTs is still not affected even after the process of the nanocomposites’ preparation is completed. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was carried out for Fe-MWCNTs. Figure 8e shows the presence of magnetite (Fe3O4) over the MWCNTs, taking into consideration the presence of the iron, oxygen, and carbon atoms, as can be seen from EDX analysis.

3.1.5. Determination of Surface Area and Pore Volume

The surface area, pore volume, and average pore size values of fresh, oxidized, and modified MWCNTs samples were determined by the Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) technique, as presented in Table 2. Fresh MWCNTs showed a total surface area of 161 m2/g. Ox-MWCNTs could form carboxyl and hydroxy functional groups, which might block the micropore openings [45] and also result in a small decrease in the BET surface area from 161 to 146 m2/g. Table 2 indicates that the surface and volume micro-values of fresh MWCNTs decreased after MWCNTs oxidation with strong acids. Fe3O4 with a particle size less than 10 nm was confirmed through the SEM and TEM results. The deposition of magnetite to MWCNTs in a weight ratio of 1:1 leads to an increase in the surface area of the support. The total surface area of the Fe3O4/MWCNTs (233 m2/g) was higher than the oxidized MWCNTs, indicating that the magnetite is dispersed and incorporated onto the surface of the MWCNTs, and also caused blocking of the micropores of the MWCNTs. Meanwhile, adding polystyrene to the Fe3O4/MWCNTs sample significantly reduced the surface area from 233 to 136 m2/g, and the pore volumes were also reduced. The weight ratio of the polystyrene:Fe3O4/MWCNTs sample was 1:3. Polystyrene incorporation caused the agglomeration of the Fe3O4/MWCNTs particles, as confirmed by SEM and TEM. A small decrease in the surface area from 136 to 129 m2/g was observed after the toluene adsorption test (Table 2). This supports the fact that some adsorbed hydrocarbon molecules remained in the bulk of the sample after the adsorption test and drying at 105 °C under vacuum.

3.2. Adsorption Investigations

3.2.1. Effect of Contact Time

Different contact times were used (15, 30, 60, and 120 min) to study the removal of toluene using fresh MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe nano-sorbents. The initial toluene concentration was 50 mg/L in all batch experiments, the solution volume was 50 mL, and the weight of the samples was 2 mg. Figure 9a,b show the removal efficiency and decrease in the concentration of toluene during the process time. The PS:MWCNTs:Fe nano-sorbent achieved the highest removal efficiency and the highest decrease in toluene concentration after 60 min as compared with fresh MWCNTs and Fe-MWCNTs.
The highest removal efficiency of 62% was achieved using PS:MWCNTs:Fe, which also exhibited the highest adsorption capacity of 1072 mg/g, as can be seen in Figure 10a,b.

3.2.2. Effect of Sorbent Dose

The effect of different adsorbent doses was studied using PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites. A range of adsorbent doses (1, 2, 4, and 6 mg of PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites) were used to study the removal efficiency of toluene from water. The following parameters were used: 60 min at ambient temperature, 50 mL solution volume, and 50 mg/L toluene concentration. The results indicated that a 2 mg dose of PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposite exhibited the best removal efficiency of toluene, as shown in Figure 11a.

3.2.3. Effect of Solution pH

The effect of pH on the removal of toluene from water was studied. Different pH levels (2, 5, 7, 8, and 10) over the PS:MWCNTs:Fe sample were used with the following parameters: time was 60 min, 2 mg adsorbent dose, 240 rpm shaking speed, 50 mg/L toluene concentration, and 50 mL solution volume at ambient temperature. The results showed that at a pH of 5, the highest adsorption of toluene over PS:MWCNTs:Fe was achieved, as shown in Figure 11b.

3.2.4. Effect of the Solution Temperature

The effect of temperature on the toluene removal efficiency was studied for the temperatures of 15, 25, 35, and 45 °C. The PS:MWCNTs:Fe sample was used for the measurement. The reaction time was 60 min, the weight of the adsorbent was 2 mg, the shaking speed was 240 rpm, the kerosene concentration was 50 mg/L, and the volume of the solution was 50 mL. The results showed that 35 °C was the optimum temperature for toluene removal from water over PS:MWCNTs:Fe as it demonstrated the highest efficiency, as shown in Figure 11c.
Figure 11d shows the toluene concentrations of 50, 100, 200, and 300 ppm, which were used to study the kinetic behavior of toluene adsorption over the nanocomposite adsorbent. Table 3 summarizes the data of different oil adsorption capacities reported by different researchers that were available in the literature, which are compared with the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposite. The data also confirmed that the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposite can be effectively used for the adsorption of toluene.

3.3. Kinetic Investigations

The kinetic adsorption study was carried out to determine the rate of removal of toluene from water. The kinetic models are instrumental in the determination of the rate of removal at which the adsorbent efficiently removed the adsorbate [58]. In order to find out the rate of removal of toluene, the obtained experimental adsorption data were analyzed using pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Weber–Morris kinetic models, followed by the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm [59]. Figure 12a,b show the resulting graphs from the kinetic models for toluene adsorption. The graph shown in Figure 12a confirmed that the pseudo-second-order model was the best fitting model, with the highest correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.998. Equation (3) was used for the calculation of the second-order rate constant:
t q t =   1 K 2 × q e 2 +   t q e
where k2 is the second-order rate constant, while q e and q t are the amount of toluene adsorbed (mg/g) at equilibrium and at time t (min), respectively.
The experimental data confirm that both the theoretical ( q e (th)) and experimental adsorption capacities ( q e (ex)) are in good agreement. The graph resulting from the pseudo-first-order expressively indicated that it does not fit linearly, which shows an irregular and nonlinear adsorption phenomenon [38].
The process of sorption is appropriately described by a pseudo-second-order kinetic model as it involves chemisorption [60], and these results of the kinetic models were duly supported by the outcomes of the Weber–Morris kinetic model for intra-particle diffusion, having a linear correlation of 0.998, as shown in Figure 11b. The intra-particle diffusion controls the sorption phenomenon.

3.4. Equilibrium Adsorption Study

Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were used to calculate the isotherm constants and the maximum adsorption capacities at various concentrations described in the Experimental Section to clearly understand the behavior of toluene.
Figure 13 is the linear plot of Ce/Qe as a function of Ce, where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of toluene while Qe is the amount of toluene at the adsorbent surface. The results indicated that the Langmuir isotherm was obeyed, which suggests that the adsorption is a monolayer and homogenous [61,62].

3.5. Sorption Mechanism of Toluene in Water

The proposed mechanism of toluene removal from water using the newly developed nanocomposite sorbent is presented in Figure 14. Based on the Raman, FTIR, and BET investigations, the proposed mechanism could be explained as follows:
  • π–π interactions between CNT aromatic rings and/or polystyrene rings and the aromatic rings of toluene can occur.
  • Hydrogen bonding could occur between the hydrogen atom from toluene and the oxygen atom from the metal oxides.
  • CH–π interactions could occur between the hydrogen atom from toluene and the aromatic rings of the polystyrene or MWCNTs.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, it is clearly observed that the efficiency of MWCNTs increased when magnetite and polystyrene were added to prepare the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nano-sorbent for the removal of toluene from water. Characterization results (XRD, FTIR, RAMAN, SEM, TEM, and BET) were quite evident of the successful preparation of MWCNTs, which were then oxidized with a strong acid, followed by preparation of magnetite-MWCNTs composites after adding polystyrene and toluene. The results of the toluene adsorption experiments showed that the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites achieved the highest removal efficiency and adsorption capacity of toluene removal compared with fresh, oxidized, and Fe-MWCNTs. The optimum parameters for toluene removal from water were: 60 min, 2 mg nano-sorbent dose, pH 5, solution temperature of 35 °C at 50 mL volume, toluene concentration of 50 mg/L, and shaking speed of 240 rpm. The adsorption kinetic study of toluene followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics with the best correlation, with an R2 value of 0.998, while the equilibrium adsorption study showed that the Langmuir isotherm was obeyed, which suggests that the adsorption is a monolayer and homogenous.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A.A. and T.J.; methodology, I.C.; validation, A.D.S., and R.T.R.; formal analysis, B.S.; investigation, T.A.A.; resources, T.J.; data curation, T.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, T.A.A.; writing—review and editing, E.D., V.S. and I.C..; visualization, V.S. and B.S.; supervision, T.J.; project administration, E.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the GINOP-2.2.1-15-2017-00106 project: Complex utilization of red mud and recovery of rare earth metals from red mud, Veszprém, Hungary.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to the University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq, for tests and measurements and to the Hungarian GINOP-2.2.1-15-2017-00106 project: Complex utilization of red mud and recovery of rare earth metals from red mud, from Pannonia University, Veszprém, Hungary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neelamegan, H.; Yang, D.K.; Lee, G.J.; Anandan, S.; Wu, J.J. Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles anchored cellulose and lignin-based carbon nanotube composites for rapid oil spill cleanup. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pethsangave, D.A.; Wadekar, P.H.; Khose, R.V.; Some, S. Superhydrophobic carrageenan cross-linked graphene sponge for recovery of oil and organic solvent from their water mixtures. Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anushree, C.; Krishna, D.N.G.; Philip, J. Oil-absorbent MnOx capped iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and applications in oil recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 320, 114324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Periasamy, A.P.; Wu, W.P.; Ravindranath, R.; Roy, P.; Lin, G.L.; Chang, H.T. Polymer/reduced graphene oxide functionalized sponges as superabsorbents for oil removal and recovery. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 114, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zareei Pour, F.; Sabzehmeidani, M.M.; Karimi, H.; Madadi Avargani, V.; Ghaedi, M. Superhydrophobic–superoleophilic electrospun nanofibrous membrane modified by the chemical vapor deposition of dimethyl dichlorosilane for efficient oil–water separation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tayler, A.M.; Farouq, R.; Mohamed, O.A.; Tony, M.A. Oil spill clean-up using combined sorbents: A comparative investigation and design aspects. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 100, 311–323. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wei, Y.; Qi, H.; Gong, X.; Zhao, S. Specially wettable membranes for oil-water separation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohammadi, T.; Kazemimoghadam, M.; Saadabadi, M. Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during the separation of oil in water emulsions. Desalination 2003, 157, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kukkar, D.; Rani, A.; Kumar, V.; Younis, S.A.; Zhang, M.; Lee, S.S.; Kim, K.H. Recent advances in carbon nanotube sponge–based sorption technologies for mitigation of marine oil spills. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 570, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kamgar, A.; Hassanajili, S. Super-hydrophobic Fe3O4@ SiO2@ MPS nanoparticles for soil remediation: The influence of pH and concentration on clustering phenomenon and oil sorption. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 315, 113709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Parmar, K.R.; Dora, K.; Pant, K.K.; Roy, S. An ultra-light flexible aerogel-based on methane derived CNTs as a reinforcing agent in silica-CMC matrix for efficient oil adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 375, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, X. Three-dimensional α-Fe2O3/amino-functionalization carbon nanotube sponge for adsorption and oxidative removal of tetrabromobisphenol A. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 211, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Dai, M.; Gong, Q.; Dang, Z. Ag/AgCl/MIL-101(Fe) Catalyzed Degradation of Methylene Blue under Visible Light Irradation. Materials 2019, 12, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lin, Y.Z.; Zhong, L.B.; Dou, S.; Shao, Z.D.; Liu, Q.; Zheng, Y.M. Facile synthesis of electrospun carbon nanofiber/graphene oxide composite aerogels for high efficiency oils absorption. Environ. Int. 2019, 128, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.; Li, Z.; Ke, B.; He, Z.; Cui, Y.; Pan, Z.; Su, J. Magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified with polyaluminium chloride for removal of humic acid from aqueous solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 279, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ritchie, A.W.; Cox, H.J.; Barrientos-Palomo, S.N.; Sharples, G.J.; Badyal, J.P.S. Bioinspired multifunctional polymer–nanoparticle–surfactant complex nanocomposite surfaces for antibacterial oil–water separation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 560, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, X.; Zou, C.; Zou, X. The formation of supramolecular carbon nanofibers via amidation reaction on the surface of amino single walled carbon nanotubes for selective adsorption of organic pollutants. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2019, 542, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Tang, W.; Xia, D.; Liang, Y.; Li, X. Modeling adsorption of organic pollutants onto single-walled carbon nanotubes with theoretical molecular descriptors using MLR and SVM algorithms. Chemosphere 2019, 214, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tan, X.; Wang, H.-M.D.; Zang, D.; Wu, L.; Liu, F.; Cao, G.; Xu, Y.; Ho, S.-H. Superhydrophobic/superoleophilic corn straw as an eco-friendly oil sorbent for the removal of spilled oil. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 23, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, Q.; Yu, Q.; Connell, D.W.; Yu, G. Titania/carbon nanotube composite (TiO2/CNT) and its application for removal of organic pollutants. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2013, 15, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sobhanardakani, S.; Zandipak, R. Synthesis and application of TiO2/SiO2/Fe3O4 nanoparticles as novel adsorbent for removal of Cd(II), Hg(II) and Ni(II) ions from water samples. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2017, 19, 1913–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kirti, S.; Bhandari, V.M.; Jena, J.; Sorokhaibam, L.G.; Bhattacharyya, A.S. Exploiting functionalities of biomass in nanocomposite development: Application in dye removal and disinfection along with process intensification. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 981–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Parangusan, H.; Ponnamma, D.; Hassan, M.K.; Adham, S.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.A. Designing Carbon Nanotube-Based Oil Absorbing Membranes from Gamma Irradiated and Electrospun Polystyrene Nanocomposites. Materials 2019, 12, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rekos, K.; Kampouraki, Z.-C.; Sarafidis, C.; Samanidou, V.; Deliyanni, E. Graphene Oxide Based Magnetic Nanocomposites with Polymers as Effective Bisphenol–A Nanoadsorbents. Materials 2019, 12, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wu, T.; Pan, Y.; Li, L. Fabrication of superhydrophobic hybrids from multiwalled carbon nanotubes and poly (vinylidene fluoride). Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 384, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Al-Sabagh, A.M.; Moustafa, Y.M.; Hamdy, A.; Killa, H.M.; Ghanem, R.T.M.; Morsi, R.E. Preparation and characterization of sulfonated polystyrene / magnetite nanocomposites for organic dye adsorption. Egypt. J. Pet. 2018, 27, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mergen, Ö.B.; Umut, E.; Arda, E.; Kara, S. A comparative study on the AC/DC conductivity, dielectric and optical properties of polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelets (PS/GNP) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (PS/MWCNT) nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khan, T.A.; Nazir, M.; Khan, E.A.; Riaz, U. Multiwalled carbon nanotube–polyurethane (MWCNT/PU) composite adsorbent for saffron T and Pb (II) removal from aqueous solution: Batch and fixed-bed studies. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 212, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saadati, J.; Pakizeh, M. Separation of oil/water emulsion using a new PSf/pebax/F-MWCNT nanocomposite membrane. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 71, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lv, C.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.; Li, M.; Zhu, Y. Fabrication of durable fluorine-free polyphenylene sulfide/silicone resin composite superhydrophobic coating enhanced by carbon nanotubes/graphene fillers. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 134, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, R.S.; Chen, W.H.; Lin, J.H. Polymer-grafted multi-walled carbon nanotubes through surface-initiated ring-opening polymerization and click reaction. Polymer 2011, 52, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choudhury, A.; Kar, P. Doping effect of carboxylic acid group functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube on polyaniline. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011, 42, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Z.F.; Li, L.Y.; Hsieh, C.T.; Juang, R.S. Co-precipitation of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles onto carbon nanotubes for removal of copper ions from aqueous solution. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 82, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moatmed, S.M.; Khedr, M.H.; El-dek, S.I.; Kim, H.Y.; El-Deen, A.G. Highly efficient and reusable superhydrophobic/superoleophilic polystyrene @ Fe3O4 nanofiber membrane for high-performance oil/water separation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al-Jammal, N.; Abdullah, T.A.; Juzsakova, T.; Zsirka, B.; Cretescu, I.; Vágvölgyi, V.; Sebestyén, V.; Le Phuoc, C.; Rasheed, R.T.; Domokos, E. Functionalized carbon nanotubes for hydrocarbon removal from water. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sen, P.; Suresh, K.; Kumar, R.V.; Kumar, M.; Pugazhenthi, G. A simple solvent blending coupled sonication technique for synthesis of polystyrene (PS)/multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) nanocomposites: Effect of modified MWCNT content. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. 2016, 1, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sun, C.; Negro, E.; Vezzù, K.; Pagot, G.; Cavinato, G.; Nale, A.; Bang, Y.H.; Di Noto, V. Hybrid inorganic-organic proton-conducting membranes based on SPEEK doped with WO3 nanoparticles for application in vanadium redox flow batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Das, R.; Bee, A.H.S.; Eaqub, A.M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Yongzhi, W. Carbon nanotubes characterization by X-ray powder diffraction—A review. Curr. Nanosci. 2015, 11, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Salam, M.A.; Burk, R. Synthesis and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified with octadecylamine and polyethylene glycol. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S921–S927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Loh, K.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Musa, A.; Salmah, A.A.; Zamri, I. Use of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for enhancement of biosensor response to the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Sensors 2008, 8, 5775–5791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liao, M.H.; Chen, D.H. Immobilization of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase on magnetic nanoparticles for improving its stability. Biotechnol. Lett. 2001, 23, 1723–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bokobza, L.; Zhang, J. Raman spectroscopic characterization of multiwall carbon nanotubes and of composites. Express Polym. Lett. 2012, 6, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bankole, M.T.; Abdulkareem, A.S.; Mohammed, I.A.; Ochigbo, S.S.; Tijani, J.O.; Abubakre, O.K.; Roos, W.D. Selected heavy metals removal from electroplating wastewater by purified and polyhydroxylbutyrate functionalized carbon nanotubes adsorbents. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zdrojek, M.; Gebicki, W.; Jastrzebski, C.; Melin, T.; Huczko, A. Studies of multiwall carbon nanotubes using Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. Solid State Phenom. 2004, 99, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Birch, M.E.; Ruda-Eberenz, T.A.; Chai, M.; Andrews, R.; Hatfield, R.L. Properties that influence the specific surface areas of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2013, 57, 1148–1166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Anjum, H.; Johari, K.; Gnanasundaram, N.; Ganesapillai, M.; Arunagiri, A.; Regupathi, I.; Thanabalan, M. A review on adsorptive removal of oil pollutants (BTEX) from wastewater using carbon nanotubes. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 277, 1005–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Da Costa, J.S.; Bertizzolo, E.G.; Bianchini, D.; Fajardo, A.R. Adsorption of benzene and toluene from aqueous solution using a composite hydrogel of alginate-grafted with mesoporous silica. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abbas, A.; Abussaud, B.A.; Ihsanullah Al-Baghli, N.A.H.; Redhwi, H.H. Adsorption of toluene and paraxylene from aqueous solution using pure and iron oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes: Kinetics and isotherms study. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2017, 2017, 2853925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Su, F.; Lu, C.; Hu, S. Adsorption of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and p-xylene by NaOCl-oxidized carbon nanotubes. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 353, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Souza, S.M.D.A.G.U.; da Luz, A.D.; da Silva, A.; de Souza, A.A.U. Removal of mono-and multicomponent BTX compounds from effluents using activated carbon from coconut shell as the adsorbent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 6461–6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mohammed, J.; Nasri, N.S.; Zaini, M.A.A.; Hamza, U.D.; Ani, F.N. Adsorption of benzene and toluene onto KOH activated coconut shell based carbon treated with NH3. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 102, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qin, G.; Yao, Y.; Wei, W.; Zhang, T. Preparation of hydrophobic granular silica aerogels and adsorption of phenol from water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 280, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fatimah, I.; Huda, T. Preparation of cetyltrimethylammonium intercalated Indonesian montmorillonite for adsorption of toluene. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 74, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Srivastava, I.; Mishra, S.; Singh, P.K.; Gupta, T.; Sankararamakrishnan, N. Fast and efficient removal of Toluene, Ethylbenzene and O-Xylene from aqueous phase by functionalized carbon micro/nano composites. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4917–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bedin, S.; Oliveira, M.; Vieira, M.; Vieira, M.; Silva, M.; Santos, O. Adsorption of toluene in batch system in natural clay and organoclay. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2013, 32, 313–318. [Google Scholar]
  56. Asadi, F.; Zerafat, M. Adsorption of toluene fromaqueous solutions using clay-based nanostructures. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Asenjo, N.G.; Álvarez, P.; Granda, M.; Blanco, C.; Santamaría, R.; Menéndez, R. High performance activated carbon for benzene/toluene adsorption from industrial wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Zhao, L.; Jinghui, D.; Peizhe, S.; Jiashu, L.; Yi, J.; Norihide, N.; Zhi, Q.; Hiroaki, T.; Yongkui, Y. Nanomaterials for Treating Emerging Contaminants in Water by Adsorption and Photocatalysis: Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kajjumba, G.W. Modelling of adsorption kinetic processes—Errors. In Theory and Application; Emik, S., Ed.; InTechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2019; Chapter 10. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fei, L.; Jingwei, R.; Rijie, W.; Yanfei, L.; Xiaoxia, Y. Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies on the Adsorption of Thiophene and Benzothiophene onto NiCeY Zeolites. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 23011–23020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Abedi, Z.; Assadi, A.; Farahmandkia, Z.; Mehrasebi, M.R. The effect of natural organic compounds on the adsorption of toluene and ethylene benzene on MWCNT. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2019, 17, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Leili, M.; Edris, B.; Meissam, N.; Alireza, A.-M.; Farahnaz, B.; Davoud, B. Adsorptive Removal of Benzene and Toluene from Aqueous Environments by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles: Kinetics and Isotherm Studies. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
Materials 14 05503 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic flow chart for the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposite preparation.
Figure 1. Schematic flow chart for the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposite preparation.
Materials 14 05503 g001
Materials 14 05503 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram for organic phase (toluene) removal in wastewater.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram for organic phase (toluene) removal in wastewater.
Materials 14 05503 g002
Materials 14 05503 g003 550
Figure 3. Standard calibration curve for toluene solutions performed by HPLC.
Figure 3. Standard calibration curve for toluene solutions performed by HPLC.
Materials 14 05503 g003
Materials 14 05503 g004 550
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, PS:MWCNTs:Fe, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe after toluene adsorption.
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, PS:MWCNTs:Fe, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe after toluene adsorption.
Materials 14 05503 g004
Materials 14 05503 g005 550
Figure 5. The XRD patterns for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS: MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites.
Figure 5. The XRD patterns for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS: MWCNTs:Fe nanocomposites.
Materials 14 05503 g005
Materials 14 05503 g006 550
Figure 6. The Raman spectra for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, PS:MWCNTs:Fe, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe after toluene adsorption.
Figure 6. The Raman spectra for fresh MWCNTs, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, PS:MWCNTs:Fe, and PS:MWCNTs:Fe after toluene adsorption.
Materials 14 05503 g006
Materials 14 05503 g007 550
Figure 7. The SEM images for Fe:MWCNTs (a,b) and for PS:MWCNTs:Fe (c,d).
Figure 7. The SEM images for Fe:MWCNTs (a,b) and for PS:MWCNTs:Fe (c,d).
Materials 14 05503 g007
Materials 14 05503 g008a 550Materials 14 05503 g008b 550
Figure 8. The TEM spectra for Fe:MWCNTs (a,b), PS:MWCNTs:Fe (c,d) and EDX results for Fe-MWCNTs (e).
Figure 8. The TEM spectra for Fe:MWCNTs (a,b), PS:MWCNTs:Fe (c,d) and EDX results for Fe-MWCNTs (e).
Materials 14 05503 g008aMaterials 14 05503 g008b
Materials 14 05503 g009a 550Materials 14 05503 g009b 550
Figure 9. (a) Adsorption efficiency for removal of toluene from water as a function of time using fresh, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS-MWCNTs-Fe. (b) Decrease in the toluene concentration in water as a function of time using fresh, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS-MWCNTs-Fe.
Figure 9. (a) Adsorption efficiency for removal of toluene from water as a function of time using fresh, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS-MWCNTs-Fe. (b) Decrease in the toluene concentration in water as a function of time using fresh, ox-MWCNTs, Fe-MWCNTs, and PS-MWCNTs-Fe.
Materials 14 05503 g009aMaterials 14 05503 g009b
Materials 14 05503 g010 550
Figure 10. Flow chart explaining the removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity of nano-sorbents after 120 min (b).
Figure 10. Flow chart explaining the removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity of nano-sorbents after 120 min (b).
Materials 14 05503 g010
Materials 14 05503 g011 550
Figure 11. Effect of changing the adsorbent dosage (a), pH of the solution (b), temperature (c) and concentration of the solution (d) on the removal efficiency of toluene over the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nano-sorbent.
Figure 11. Effect of changing the adsorbent dosage (a), pH of the solution (b), temperature (c) and concentration of the solution (d) on the removal efficiency of toluene over the PS:MWCNTs:Fe nano-sorbent.
Materials 14 05503 g011
Materials 14 05503 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Pseudo-second-order kinetic model for toluene adsorption. (b) Weber-Morris (intra-particle diffusion model) kinetic model for toluene adsorption.
Figure 12. (a) Pseudo-second-order kinetic model for toluene adsorption. (b) Weber-Morris (intra-particle diffusion model) kinetic model for toluene adsorption.
Materials 14 05503 g012
Materials 14 05503 g013 550
Figure 13. Langmuir isotherm model for toluene adsorption.
Figure 13. Langmuir isotherm model for toluene adsorption.
Materials 14 05503 g013
Materials 14 05503 g014 550
Figure 14. Proposed adsorption mechanism for toluene removal in water.
Figure 14. Proposed adsorption mechanism for toluene removal in water.
Materials 14 05503 g014
Table
Table 1. FTIR peak assignments for fresh and modified MWCNTs.
Table 1. FTIR peak assignments for fresh and modified MWCNTs.
CompoundVibrations (cm−1)Explanation
Fresh MWCNTs3425, 1625 cm−1O–H Stretching and bending of water, respectively
2925 cm−1C–H Stretching of aromatic
2845 cm−1C–H Stretching of branching
1460 cm−1C=C Stretching of aromatic
1395 cm−1C–C Stretching of MWCNTs
Ox-MWCNTs 3420 cm−1O–H Stretching of –COOH group
1490 cm−1C=O Stretching of –COOH group
1400 cm−1C–O Stretching of –COOH group
Fe-MWCNTs720 cm−1Fe–O Stretching of metal oxide with carboxyl group in MWCNTs
Ads/PS:MWCNTs:Fe2925 cm−1C–H Stretching of aromatic ring
2845 cm−1C–H Stretching of –CH3 group
1035 cm−1C–H bending in-plane
545 cm−1C–H bending in out-of-plane
Table
Table 2. Surface area, pore volume, and average pore size values of fresh and modified MWCNTs.
Table 2. Surface area, pore volume, and average pore size values of fresh and modified MWCNTs.
SampleSBET m2/gV1.7–300 nm, cm3/gSmicro
m2/g		Vmicro, cm3/gDav, nm BJH
1MWCNTs1610.793222.860.009617.9
2Ox-MWCNTs1461.114213.90.005326.0
3Fe-MWCNTs2330.5737008.5
4PS:MWCNTs:Fe 1360.3372008.5
5PS:MWCNTs:Fe Ads.1290.3075007.6
Table
Table 3. Adsorption capacities of different adsorbents for hydrocarbons.
Table 3. Adsorption capacities of different adsorbents for hydrocarbons.
Adsorbent UsedOil PollutantConditionsDoseCapacityReference
mg(mg/g)
Activated carbonToluene100 mg/L, pH 6.910501[46]
GEL-SBA15 Toluene650 mg/L, pH 710597[47]
CNTs-iron oxideToluene100 mg/L, pH 750381[48]
CNTs-NaOClToluene20–200 mg/L, pH 7, T 25 °COct-50285[49]
Modified activated carbonToluene50 mg/L, pH 6, T 23 °C50126[50]
Microemulsion/MWCNTsKerosene500 mg/L, 25 °C104700[30]
KOH activated coconut shell based carbon treated with NH3Toluene50–250 mg/L, pH 6, T 30 °C, 115 rpm100357[51]
Granule silica aerogelPhenol290 mg/L, pH 4–7, T 25 °C500142[52]
Organo-clay CTMAToluene0.0125–0.25 mg/L20058[53]
LCNT-oxToluene10–100 mg/L, pH 3–9, T 25 °C2072[54]
Na-smectiteToluene100 mg/L, pH 6-410[55]
Porous clay heterostructures (PCH)Toluene10–500 g/L, T 25 ± 2 °C, pH 3–110.5–4 g/L101.1[56]
High-performance activated carbon Toluene175–225 mg/L, T 25 °C, pH 7 1200[57]
PS:MWCNTs-Fe Toluene200 mg/L, T 25 °C, pH 2–101 to 61113Current work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdullah, T.A.; Juzsakova, T.; Rasheed, R.T.; Salman, A.D.; Sebestyen, V.; Domokos, E.; Sluser, B.; Cretescu, I. Polystyrene-Fe3O4-MWCNTs Nanocomposites for Toluene Removal from Water. Materials 2021, 14, 5503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195503

AMA Style

Abdullah TA, Juzsakova T, Rasheed RT, Salman AD, Sebestyen V, Domokos E, Sluser B, Cretescu I. Polystyrene-Fe3O4-MWCNTs Nanocomposites for Toluene Removal from Water. Materials. 2021; 14(19):5503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdullah, Thamer Adnan, Tatjána Juzsakova, Rashed Taleb Rasheed, Ali Dawood Salman, Viktor Sebestyen, Endre Domokos, Brindusa Sluser, and Igor Cretescu. 2021. "Polystyrene-Fe3O4-MWCNTs Nanocomposites for Toluene Removal from Water" Materials 14, no. 19: 5503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195503

APA Style

Abdullah, T. A., Juzsakova, T., Rasheed, R. T., Salman, A. D., Sebestyen, V., Domokos, E., Sluser, B., & Cretescu, I. (2021). Polystyrene-Fe3O4-MWCNTs Nanocomposites for Toluene Removal from Water. Materials, 14(19), 5503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop