Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of In Situ ZrB2-SiC-ZrC Coating on ZrC-SiC Substrate by Reactive Plasma Spraying
Previous Article in Journal
Electrically Switchable Film Structure of Conjugated Polymer Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 6
10.3390/ma15062218
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Removal of Thiol-SAM on a Gold Surface for Re-Use of an Interdigitated Chain-Shaped Electrode

by
Hien T. Ngoc Le
1,
Le Minh Tu Phan
2 and
Sungbo Cho
1,3,*
1
Department of Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Korea
2
School of Medicine and Pharmacy, The University of Danang, Danang 550000, Vietnam
3
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, GAIHST, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(6), 2218; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062218
Submission received: 15 February 2022 / Revised: 7 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 17 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterial Interfaces: From Fundamentals to Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The self-assembled monolayer (SAM) is the most common organic assembly utilized for the formation of the monolayers of alkane-thiolates on gold electrode, resulting in a wide range of applications for the modified SAM on gold in various research areas. This study examined the desorption of a SAM that was developed on the gold surface of an interdigitated chain-shaped electrode (the ICE, a unique electrode design, was fabricated by our group) with the goal of determining the most efficient strategy of SAM removal for the ICE to be re-used. A simple and proficient solution-based cleaning procedure was applied for the removal of a SAM on the gold surface of the ICE by using a sodium borohydride solution within short-term treatment, resulting in efficiency for the recovery of the originally electrochemical characteristic of ICE of 90.3%. The re-use of ICE after the removal process was confirmed by the successful re-deposition of a SAM onto the electrode surface, resulting in the high efficiency percentage of 90.1% for the reusability of ICE with the SAM modification. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) were used as tools to investigate the changes in the electrode interface at each stage of the SAM removal and the electrode recycling. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy were employed, being powerful spectrum techniques, for the characterization of the bonding structure and chemical state of the bare ICE and the modified ICE at each treatment step. Based on the comprehensive discussion of analytical chemistry from the obtained EIS and CV data in this study, we confirmed and proved the effectiveness of this promising method for the removal of a SAM from the ICE and the re-use of ICE in the field of material deposition, with the aims of saving money, improving experimental handling, and protecting the environment.

1. Introduction

Deposition processes are concerned with the deposition of materials, thin films, or composite coatings on a substrate. They have been applied for many applications in energy, biosensor, electronics, and semiconductor fields [1,2,3]. There are several deposition techniques, such as electrodeposition for the fabrication of Ni matrix micro- and nano-SiC composite coatings at room and elevated temperature [4], functionally graded Zn–Ni–Al2O3 coatings [5], and nickel–fullerene C60 composition coatings [6]; vacuum thermal evaporation [1,2]; electron beam evaporation [7]; laser beam evaporation [8] for depositing thin films; electrochemical deposition for developing thin layers, graphene, and nanoparticles [3,9]; and chemical-absorption for depositing a self-assembled monolayer on a gold substrate [10,11,12].
Molecular constituents from a solution adsorb onto a solid surface to form organic assemblies, which are known as self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) [13]. A SAM with a head group, a tail group, and a functional end group is representative of this. A wide range of self-assembling systems have been explored. Monolayers of alkane-thiolates on gold are presumably the most studied SAMs, since the –SH molecules of the head groups are tightly bound to the gold surface [10,11,12,13]. A SAM offers the most straightforward way to generate ultrathin, repeatable, oriented, and ordered monolayers that can preserve the activity of functionalized macro- or micro-molecules at the carboxylic acid (–COOH) terminal of the functional end group of the SAM [10,11]. Consequently, SAM has been used in a variety of research, including that of electrochemical biosensors [10,11,12], interface phenomena, biological and biochemical processes, electrochemistry, and molecular interactions [14,15,16,17]. As examples, gold electrode surfaces were modified with SAMs for binding different probe sequences to capture DNA target in order to establish a DNA biosensor for the diagnosis and treatment of an infectious disease [18]; a gold substrate was treated with a SAM by dip-coating and by patterning with a benchtop microdropper to explore neuronal adhesion through the precise and exclusive positioning of the neural cell bodies onto modified electrodes and inhibits, and at the same time, cellular adhesion in the surrounding insulator areas [19]; a gold surface was functionalized with the SAM to immobilize bacteriophages, in particular, for real-time monitoring of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via surface plasmon resonance [20]; the immobilization of SAMs on gold fingers of an interdigitated chain-shaped electrode to develop various electrochemical biosensors for sensitive detection of protein biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease [10,11,12].
The quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) is a traditionally technique to determine the adsorption of SAMs onto a gold surface. A model QCM device was used to detect the resonance frequency of the QCM chip in three stages: the bare chip, the chip immobilized with SAMs, and the chip after removing SAMs [21,22,23]. Recent QCM studies have reported: the formation of SAMs from stirred ferrocenylundecanethiol in hexane at room temperature, and the total frequency shift suggested SAMs formation [24]; the adsorption of two SAMs, i.e., octadecanethiol and octanethiol, in stirred hexane and cyclohexane solutions at room temperature over a broad range of concentrations, from 10−3 to 10−1 mM [25]; and the constitution of biotin-terminated thiol-SAMs on QCM for the construction of immunosensors [26]. Besides that, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), a powerful electrochemical technique, has arisen and has been applied to characterizing the formation of the SAMs on gold electrode surfaces by monitoring the changes in the impedance at the electrode–electrolyte interface [10,11,12].
The typical rectangular interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) are constructed of two linear interdigitated electrodes with two connection tracks [27,28]. IDEs provide numerous benefits, such as working with low volumes of sample and avoiding the dreary polishing of solid electrodes [29]. These two configurations of IDEs enabled the wide utilization of IDEs in the characterization of changes in charge-transfer resistance and the double-layer capacitance at the electrode interface through the measurement of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [27]. However, a concentrated electric field at the edge is a side effect of IDEs, which reduces the signal quality during EIS measurements [10,30]. Particularly, in our previous study for monitoring the EIS of the cells on the IDE [31,32], it is well known that working area is not homogenous in the typical rectangular IDE, because the electric fields on the IDE are heterogeneous (the electric field is highly concentrated at the edge of the rectangular electrode). This means that the EIS measurements of the cell or material layers on the IDE are highly affected by the cells located at the electrode corners, resulting in reducing the EIS measurement sensitivity of the cell on the entire electrode area [31,32].
Therefore, in our recent studies [10,12], through correctly designing the electrode shape, by regulating the width or spacing of the electrode, the edge’s influence of electric field distribution has been avoided, leading to enhanced sensor area homogeneity on electrodes and precise EIS measurements of the electrode surface modifications. In previous studies [10,11,12], we fabricated an interdigitated chain-shaped electrode (ICE), a unique design. The interdigitated electrodes of ICE are designed in the shape of a chain containing numerous gold fingers of 5 µm to avoid the effect of the concentrated electric field at the edge. The distribution of electric fields in the areas between the ICE fingers is relatively uniform, as determined through using a COMSOL simulation [31], leading to enhanced homogeneity in the electrode working area, resulting in improved capabilities for electrode surface modification. Furthermore, the Warburg diffusion impedance in EIS has been completely eliminated by using ICE [10,11].
EIS has experienced a significant increase in popularity in recent years, owing to its exceptional sensitivity. The EIS technique is used to estimate the electrical properties of materials and their interfaces with electrodes that have been surface-modified [11,33]. This method has been extensively used in electrochemistry [34,35], biomedical applications [36,37], materials science [38], and other fields. EIS is a type of impedance measurement using alternating current polarography, which includes electrochemical reactions, and results in signals corresponding to the charge-transfer resistance and the double-layer capacitance at the electrode interface [39].
Our past research has demonstrated that a SAM is the main components used to successfully modify the gold surface of the ICE, which has been used in the construction of a variety of electrochemical biosensors in the field of sensing technology [10,11,12]. Besides that, the formation of a SAM on the gold surface has been utilized as a platform for the development of analytical tools in electronics, such as introducing a SAM as a counterbalancing dipole to the work function of the electrode in order to modify organic thin film transistors [40], using a SAM as a molecular junction between two electrodes with gold to shrink the size of electronics by replacing traditional thin film transistors with ones based on SAMs [41], modifying graphene with SAMs in the construction of graphene-based field effect transistors (GFETs) to reduce power consumption and use in very high frequency electronic devices [42,43,44], and patterning of SAMs on metal surfaces in applications of organic solar cells for modifying cathodes to block holes [45]. However, each ICE with a modified SAM and the electronic devices based on the platform SAM–gold were discarded after only one usage in each application, since it is hard to remove the SAM from the gold surface, leading to electrode waste, manufacturing costs, and an environmental impact. The development of technologies to regenerate the underlying gold will enable the electrode surface to be re-used, resulting in cost savings, environmental protection, and improved experimental handling. In an ideal situation, the SAM should be entirely eliminated from the surface without affecting the gold substrate.
To remove the SAM molecules from gold substrates, there are a variety of approaches available. Ozone and UV radiation are approaches that can be used in the presence of air to decompose the thiol compounds of the SAM [46]. However, the limitation of these procedures would be that the fluctuation must be spread evenly over the surface to be wiped, and portions that are shaded from the light may not have been efficiently wiped down. Heat treatment is a practical method for removing thiol molecules from air [47], but it still needs high temperatures (of over 200 °C) to be used for a reasonable timeframe, which could harm the gold substrate. SAMs have recently been shown to dissolve when exposed to a laser beam [48]. Due to the fact that it could only eliminate a tiny amount of a SAM at a time, this approach has limitations for real implementations.
It is highly useful to operate with liquids, since they allow many samples to be cleaned uniformly, while also reaching complex surfaces. Electrochemical cleaning is the most commonly used solution-based cleaning procedure. Whenever a negative voltage is given to the gold substrate, the SAM’s molecules begin to desorb, which is known as electrochemical desorption. It is common practice to immerse the SAM-coated gold substrate in an electrolyte solution with a pH that is basic or neutral [49]. Due to the fact that some alkane-thiolates are re-absorbed on the gold surface as a result of electrochemical cleaning, the potentials used and the time spent conducting the test are essential considerations [50].
In this study, we introduce a simple and efficient method for removing SAM from the gold surface of an ICE by using a sodium borohydride (NaBH4) solution. The ICE with the SAM modification was immersed in an NaBH4 solution for a short time to entirely remove the SAM on the ICE surface, and to recover the original electrochemical properties of the ICE. Furthermore, an applicable re-use of ICE after the SAM removal process was performed by the re-deposition of the SAM on the electrode surface. EIS and cyclic voltammetry were used to characterize the electrochemical behavior, and the changes in the electrode interface in the SAM removal stage and in the ICE re-use stage. The two powerful spectroscopy techniques of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy were utilized to characterize the electronic structure and chemical bonding of the bare ICE and the electrode modification at each stage. Additionally, the efficiencies of the removal of the SAM on the ICE surface and the re-use of ICE in the material deposition were calculated in this paper. We also propose an easy and new process for cleaning the bare ICE with NaBH4 solution, prior to beginning the electrode modifications, which is described in the following section.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

6-Mercaptohexanoic acid (MHA, 90%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, powder, ≥98.0%), and potassium ferrocyanide/ferricyanide ([Fe(CN)6]3−/4−, powder) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Seoul, Korea). Potassium chloride (KCl, extra pure) was bought from Daejung Chemicals and Metals Co., Ltd., (Siheung, Korea). Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS, 1X, liquid, pH 7.4) was purchased from Welgene Inc. (Gyeongsan, Korea). De-ionized (DI) H2O was obtained from Water Purification System, PURESCIENCE (Seongnam, Korea). Ethanol (extra pure, 94%) was provided by OCI Company Ltd., (Seoul, Korea).

2.2. Manufacture of the Interdigitated Chain Shaped-Electrode (ICE)

The ICE was manufactured on a glass slide substrate of (14 mm × 3.5 mm). The electron beam evaporator system (SEE-5, ULTECH, Daegu, South Korea) was used to deposit a 25 nm thick adhesive Ti layer (deposition rate of 1 A s−1, emission current of 68–80 mA), and a 50 nm thick Au electrode layer (deposition rate of 1 A s−1, emission current of 55–74 mA). Next, the lift-off process was used to generate the paired electrode finger, including the space of 5 μm and the width of 5 μm, for the working and reference electrodes, respectively. Figure 1a shows a photo of ICE including the working and reference electrodes, and microscopic images of the ICE containing Au fingers.

2.3. Deposition of the Self-Assembled Monolayer (SAM) on the ICE. Removing the SAM on the Surface of ICE. Re-Depositing the SAM on the ICE

Before developing the SAM on the ICE surface, the bare ICE was cleaned with 0.5 M NaBH4 solution in 1:1 H2O/Ethanol and dried under nitrogen flow to discard impurities on the ICE surface.
Subsequently, the bare ICE was dipped in 100 mM MHA solution for 2 h at room temperature (RT; 25 °C) to create the SAM on the Au surface of ICE (ICE/SAM) through the bonding between gold (Au) of ICE and sulfur (S) at the head group of the SAM, as shown in Figure 1.
To re-use the ICE, the ICE/SAM was immersed in 0.5 M NaBH4 solution for 10 min at RT to remove the SAM on the ICE surface (re-ICE) and return the ICE to its original state.
To approve the re-use of ICE, the SAM was again deposited on the re-ICE (re-ICE/SAM) by dipping the re-ICE in a 100 mM MHA solution for 2 h at room temperature (25 °C), and then it was washed with extra pure ethanol and DI H2O. This procedure is similar to the deposition of the SAM on bare ICE, as described above, which is a quality control process for the successful formation of the SAM on the gold surface of ICE, as shown in the Results and Discussion section.

2.4. Structural Characterization

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific MultiLab 2000, East Grinstead, UK) with X-ray sources of a twin anode (Al Kα, hν = 1486.6 eV) gun and a monochromatic gun was used to characterize the chemical state and the electronic structure of the bare electrode and the electrode modification.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, a wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1, scanning speed of 2 mm s−1, data interval of 0.964233 cm−1, resolution of 4 cm−1, Jasco-4600, Jasco Inc., Easton, MD, USA) was used to characterize the functional and bonding groups on the electrode surface. The FT-IR result was obtained by measuring three consecutive runs for each sample.

2.5. Electrochemical Characterization

BioLogic’s potentiostat/galvanostat instrument (SP-200, Seyssinet-Pariset, France) was used to investigate the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and the cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements of the ICE and the ICE modification. EIS was performed in a two-electrode configuration with an input sinus amplitude of 50 mV and the applied frequency range of 1 MHz to 100 mHz, and CV was performed in a three-electrode configuration with an external Ag/AgCl electrode, in 1 mM K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl.

3. Results and Discussion

Cleaning ICE is an important step to remove numerous contaminants on the electrode surface and enhance the quality of the active Au surface of ICE for the chemical modification. Therefore, the bare ICE was cleaned with 0.5 M NaBH4 solution to remove dust and impurities existing on the surface. Figure 2 shows the EIS and CV of the ICE before and after the cleaning process. EIS results express the changes in the interfacial electrode surface in the electrolyte of 1 mM K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl in a Nyquist plot of the image impedance (−Im(Z)) vs. the real impedance (Re(Z)), as shown in Figure 2a. The meanings of Nyquist plots were described using the Randle’s equivalent circuit model (REC) (Figure 2a inset), which included three parameters: Rs, corresponding to the solution resistance which can be found by reading the real axis (Re(Z)) value at the high frequency intercept; Rct, corresponding to the interfacial charge-transfer resistance which equals the semicircular diameter of the Nyquist plot; Cdl, corresponding to the double-layer capacitance which is in parallel with the Rct.
Using the REC for fitting the measured Nyquist plots in Figure 2a, the obtained Rct value of ICE decreased significantly to 86 kΩ after the cleaning step, as compared to the high Rct value (390 kΩ) of ICE before the cleaning step. This decrease in Rct was due to the easy transport of the K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox probes toward the electrode surface; this result indicated that the movement obstruction of redox probes was prevented by elimination of the impurities that existed on the electrode surface, demonstrating the successful removal of contaminants on the electrode surface, and that the original electrochemical behavior of the ICE had been brought back. CV of the ICE after cleaning (Figure 2b) showed the increase in current intensity, re-confirming the enhancement in the electrochemical properties of ICE. Recent studies of gold electrode cleaning procedures, such as electrochemical cleaning (via applying cyclic voltammetry between −1.0 and 1.3 V, scan rate of 0.1 V s−1 in a solution of 0.05 M H2SO4) [51,52,53,54] and heat treatment (via increasing temperature) [55], also displayed an increase in current intensity in the CV of gold electrode after the cleaning step, agreeing with the tendency of the obtained CV in this report, and proving the improvement in the quality of bare ICE after using the NaBH4 for cleaning.

3.1. XPS and FT-IR Results of ICE, ICE/SAM, and Re-ICE

To identify the change in the Au surface of ICE after the SAM modification and the SAM removal (as described in Section 2.3), the Au 4f spectra of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and re-ICE samples (Figure 3) were identified by using XPS, since XPS is a powerful technique to analyze the chemical state and electronic structure of an electrode surface [56]. As seen in Figure 3a, the Au 4f spectra of the bare ICE had the two typical peaks of bulk metallic gold Au(0), of the Au 4f7/2 Au(0) at 84 eV and the Au 4f5/2 Au(0) at 88 eV of binding energy, respectively [57]. After the deposition of the SAM, a shift in the Au 4f peaks was observed for the ICE/SAM sample (Figure 3a); this phenomenon is attributed to the formation of Au–S bonding between the Au surface of ICE and the terminal S group of the SAM. As seen in Figure 3b, the deconvolution of the Au 4f spectra of the ICE/SAM indicates two peaks of metallic gold of Au 4f7/2 Au(0) (84 eV) and Au 4f5/2 Au(0) (88 eV), along with the peaks that occurred for Au 4f7/2 Au–S (85 eV) and Au 4f5/2 Au–S (89 eV) [57], demonstrating the successful deposition of the SAM on the Au surface of the bare ICE. Subsequently, the Au 4f spectra of the ICE after the removal of the SAM from the electrode surface—the re-ICE sample (Figure 3a)—showed the disappearance of the Au–S peaks, and the return of the two peaks of Au(0) at 84 and 88 eV, as compared to the Au 4f spectra of the ICE and ICE/SAM, indicating that using the NaBH4 treatment brought back the ICE’s original characteristics.
FT-IR was used to identify the bonding groups of the electrode and the modified electrode. Figure 4 shows the FT-IR spectra of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and re-ICE. The spectra of ICE/SAM show the formation of the covalent bonding of Au–S and the stretch mode of C–S groups of the SAM in the band range (500 to 850) cm−1, and the O–H deformation mode and methyl antisymmetric bending mode of the SAM in the band (950 to 1400) cm−1, respectively, demonstrating the deposition of the SAM on the Au surface of the bare ICE [58,59]. The re-ICE showed the FT-IR spectra that match the spectra of the bare ICE in all regions of wavenumbers after the SAM removal by NaBH4. This result indicated the successfully reorganization of the ICE after the SAM deposition and removal process, respectively.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and Re-ICE, and the Application of Re-ICE for the Deposition of the SAM on the Electrode Surface

The EIS tests of ICE, ICE/SAM, re-ICE, and re-ICE/SAM were performed in 1 mM K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl, and results are expressed through Nyquist plots, as shown in Figure 5a–c. Using REC to fit the EIS data, the values of the three parameters of Rct, Cdl, and Rs were obtained, and are displayed in Table 1. The fitted Rct value of the ICE was 86 kΩ. Significant enhancement in Rct was observed after the addition of the SAM to the ICE surface (Figure 5a and Table 1), and the obtained Rct value of ICE/SAM was 1900 kΩ. This increment in the Rct was attributed to the non-conductivity of the long hydrocarbon chains and the carboxylic acids group of the SAM, which led to impeding the movement of the K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple to the ICE surface. As seen in Figure 5d, after SAM modification on the ICE, the CV result showed a rapid decrease in current intensity, indicating the reduced conductivity of the electrode due to the formation of the SAM on the electrode surface, agreeing with the EIS results.
Figure 5a,b shows the EIS results of the re-ICE after the removal of the SAM from the ICE surface with the treatment of NaBH4 solution. The Nyquist plot of the re-ICE demonstrates the expressive decrease in the Rct with a value of 87 kΩ. This decrease in Rct was due to the easy transportation of the K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple toward the electrode surface; the hindrance of the transfer of the redox probe to the surface of electrode was removed, which was caused by the elimination of the SAM on the ICE surface. It is observed that the Rct value of the re-ICE (87 kΩ) approximately equals the Rct of the bare ICE (86 kΩ), demonstrating that removal of the SAM from the ICE was successfully completed by the treatment with NaBH4 solution. The re-confirmation of the elimination of the SAM from the ICE’s surface was also performed by CV measurement. The CV result of the re-ICE after removing SAM in Figure 5d indicates a significant increase in the current intensity, and equals the current intensity of the CV result of the bare ICE, re-confirming the removal of the SAM from the ICE, and the restoration of the original electrochemical behaviors of ICE.
After the successful removal of the SAM from the ICE, the re-ICE was used to immobilize the SAM for the purpose of demonstrating the ICE’s reusability, as described in Section 2.3. Figure 5a,c shows that after the addition of the SAM to the re-ICE, the Rct in the Nyquist plot of the re-ICE/SAM showed a remarkable increment (1870 kΩ in Table 1), as compared to the Rct of the re-ICE (87 kΩ) and the ICE (86 kΩ). This increment in Rct confirmed the formation of the SAM insulator on the surface of re-ICE, leading to delaying the transfer of the K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple to the electrode surface. The re-ICE/SAM showed the approximate Rct value, as compared to the Rct of the ICE/SAM, as seen in Figure 5c and Table 1, indicating the reusability of the ICE in the field of material deposition. The CV result of the re-ICE/SAM in Figure 5d displays the rapid decline of current intensity compared to the CV of the re-ICE and shows a similar tendency to the CV result of the ICE/SAM, which was related to the non-conductivity of the SAM EIS results. All EIS and CV results indicate or confirm the successful restoration of the original properties, and the reusability of ICE in material deposition.

3.3. Efficiency Percentage

To evaluate the possible factors for the recovery of ICE’s characteristic after the removal of the SAM and the re-use of ICE with the SAM modification, the efficiency percentage was determined by calculation, as described in the following evaluation:
The efficiency percentage of the ICE recovery after SAM removal can be calculated as follows:
Efficiency (%) = (RICE/Rre-ICE) × 100,
where RICE is the Rct of the bare ICE, and Rre-ICE is the Rct of the re-ICE after the removal of the SAM.
The efficiency percentage of the reusability of ICE with the SAM modification on the surface can be calculated as follows:
Efficiency (%) = (RICE/SAM/Rre-ICE/SAM) × 100
where RICE/SAM is the Rct of the ICE/SAM with the addition of the SAM to the ICE, and Rre-ICE/SAM is the Rct of the re-ICE/SAM with the re-modification of re-ICE with a SAM.
Therefore, as shown in Figure 6, the efficiency percentage of the recovery of the ICE was found to be 90.3%, and the efficiency percentage of the recovery of the SAM modification was determined to be 90.1%, demonstrating the high efficiency results of the restoration of the ICE and the reusability of ICE for the SAM modification. These results confirmed the effectiveness of the method for the removal of thiol SAM on the gold surface of ICE, which was explored in this study, allowing us an estimation of the efficacy of this means for the property rebuilding of the ICE for the material deposition applications.

4. Conclusions

The aim of this work was to study the most effective method for removing the modified SAM on an ICE’s gold surface in order to determine the plausibility of a reuse procedure for the electrode.
Therefore, in this study, a convenient, simple, and efficiency strategy to remove SAM on the gold surface of ICE was explored by treatment for 10 min with a solution of NaBH4 with the purpose of reusing ICE to save money, protect the environment, and expeditiously manage experiments.
The full removal of the SAM and the good reusability of ICE with re-addition of the SAM were evaluated and confirmed by analyzing the electrochemical measurements, such as EIS and CV, and by using microscopy techniques such as XPS and FT-IR.
The high-efficiency percentages for the recovery of the electrochemical characteristics of ICE, and for the re-deposition of the SAM on the ICE surface, were also determined, and found to be 90.3% and 90.1%, respectively, indicating a well-founded approach for the regeneration of ICE’s gold surface in applications of material deposition, providing advantages in terms of cost savings, experimental control, and environmental protection.
A new and concise route for cleaning the bare electrode surface by applying a NaBH4 solution was also presented in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, H.T.N.L.; methodology, H.T.N.L.; validation, L.M.T.P.; writing—review and editing, supervision, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, Republic of Korea (grant numbers NRF2018M3A9F1023691 and 2019R1G1A1100610), by the Korea Environment Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) through the “Technology Development Project for Biological Hazards Management in Indoor Air” Project, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)(G232021010381), and by the GRRC program of Gyeonggi province (GRRC-Gachon2020(B01), AI-based Medical Image Analysis).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hassanien, A.S.; Akl, A.A. Effect of Se addition on optical and electrical properties of chalcogenide CdSSe thin films. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 89, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hannachi, A.; Segura, A.; Meherzi, H.M. Growth of manganese sulfide (α-MnS) thin films by thermal vacuum evaporation: Structural, morphological, optical properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 181, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Le, H.T.N.; Kim, D.S.; Phan, L.M.T.; Cho, S.B. Ultrasensitive capacitance sensor to detect amyloid-beta 1–40 in human serum using supramolecular recognition of β-CD/RGO/ITO micro-disk electrode. Talanta 2022, 237, 122907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lanzutti, A.; Lekka, M.; Leitenburg, C.; Fedrizzi, L. Effect of pulse current on wear behavior of Ni matrix micro-and nano-SiC composite coatings at room and elevated temperature. Tribol. Int. 2019, 132, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shourgeshty, M.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Karimzadeh, A. Study on functionally graded Zn–Ni–Al2O3 coatings fabricated by pulse-electrodeposition. Surf. Eng. 2019, 35, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tseluikin, V.N.; Solov′eva, N.D.; Gun′kin, I.F. Electrodeposition of Nickel–Fullerene C60 Composition Coatings. Prot. Met. 2007, 43, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lokhande, A.C.; Chalapathy, R.B.V.; He, M.; Jo, E.; Gang, M.; Pawar, S.A.; Lokhande, C.D.; Kim, J.H. Development of Cu2SnS3 (CTS) thin film solar cells by physical techniques: A status review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 153, 84–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lorenz, M.; Rao, M.S.R. 25 years of pulsed laser deposition. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 030301–030303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yagati, A.K.; Le, H.T.N.; Cho, S.B. Bioelectrocatalysis of Hemoglobin on Electrodeposited Ag Nanoflowers toward H2O2 Detection. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Le, H.T.N.; Park, J.S.; Chinnadayyala, S.R.; Cho, S.B. Sensitive electrochemical detection of amyloid beta peptide in human serum using an interdigitated chain-shaped electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 144, 111694. [Google Scholar]
  11. Le, H.T.N.; Cho, S.B. Deciphering the Disaggregation Mechanism of Amyloid Beta Aggregate by 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-Piperazinepropanesulfonic Acid Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Sensors 2021, 21, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Le, H.T.N.; Park, J.S.; Cho, S.B. A Probeless Capacitive Biosensor for Direct Detection of Amyloid Beta 1-42 in Human Serum Based on an Interdigitated Chain-Shaped Electrode. Micromachines 2020, 11, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Love, J.C.; Estroff, L.A.; Kriebel, J.K.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Whitesides, G.M. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiolates on Metals as a Form of Nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1103–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Noh, J.; Konno, K.; Ito, E.; Hara, M. Growth Processes and Control of Two-Dimensional Structure of Carboxylic Acid-Terminated Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au(111). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 1052–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tao, F.; Bernasek, S.L. Understanding Odd−Even Effects in Organic Self-Assembled Monolayers. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1408–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Swiegers, G.F.; Malefetse, T.J. New Self-Assembled Structural Motifs in Coordination Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3483–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manickam, A.; Johnson, C.A.; Kavusi, S.; Hassibi, A. Interface Design for CMOS-Integrated Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Biosensors. Sensors 2012, 12, 14467–14488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Butterworth, A.; Blues, E.; Williamson, P.; Cardona, M.; Gray, L.; Corrigan, D.K. SAM Composition and Electrode Roughness Affect Performance of a DNA Biosensor for Antibiotic Resistance. Biosensors 2019, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mescola, A.; Canale, C.; Prato, M.; Diaspro, A.; Berdondini, L.; Maccione, A.; Dante, S. Specific Neuron Placement on Gold and Silicon Nitride-Patterned, Substrates through a Two-Step Functionalization Method. Langmuir 2016, 32, 6319–6327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tawil, N.; Sacher, E.; Mandeville, R.; Meunier, M. Strategies for the Immobilization of Bacteriophages on Gold Surfaces Monitored by Surface Plasmon Resonance and Surface Morphology. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 6686–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Yuan, Y.J. Physisorption and Chemisorption of a Self-Assembled Monolayer by the Quartz Crystal Microbalance. Langmuir 2014, 30, 9637–9642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luan, Y.F.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.W.; Liu, X.L.; Brash, J.L.; Chen, H. 125I-Radiolabeling, Surface Plasmon Resonance, and Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation: Three Tools to Compare Protein Adsorption on Surfaces of Different Wettability. Langmuir 2014, 30, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hromadová, M.; Pospíšil, L.; Sokolová, R.; Bulíčková, J.; Hof, M.; Fischer-Durand, N.; Salmain, M. Atrazine-Based Self-Assembled Monolayers and Their Interaction with Anti-Atrazine Antibody: Building of an Immunosensor. Langmuir 2013, 29, 16084–16092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shimazu, K.; Yag, I.; Sato, Y.; Uosaki, K. In situ and dynamic monitoring of the self-assembling and redox processes of a ferrocenylundecanethiol monolayer by electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance. Langmuir 1992, 8, 1385–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karpovich, D.S.; Blanchard, G.J. Direct Measurement of the Adsorption Kinetics of Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers on a Microcrystalline Gold Surface. Langmuir 1994, 10, 3315–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maglio, O.; Costanzo, S.; Cercola, R.; Zambrano, G.; Mauro, M.; Battaglia, R.; Ferrini, G.; Nastri, F.; Pavone, V.; Lombardi, A. A Quartz Crystal Microbalance Immunosensor for Stem Cell Selection and Extraction. Sensors 2017, 17, 2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mazlan, N.S.; Ramli, M.M.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Halin, D.S.C.; Isa, S.S.M.; Talip, L.F.A.; Danial, N.S.; Murad, S.A.Z. Interdigitated electrodes as impedance and capacitance biosensors: A review. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1885, 020276. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ni, D.; Heisser, R.; Davaji, B.; Ivy, L.; Shepherd, R.; Lal, A. Polymer interdigitated pillar electrostatic (PIPE) actuators. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2022, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yagati, A.K.; Park, J.S.; Kim, J.S.; Ju, H.K.; Chang, K.A.; Cho, S.B. Sensitivity enhancement of capacitive tumor necrosis factor-α detection by deposition of nanoparticles on interdigitated electrode. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 55, 06GN06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. MacKay, S.; Hermansen, P.; Wishart, D.; Chen, J. Simulations of Interdigitated Electrode Interactions with Gold Nanoparticles for Impedance-Based Biosensing Applications. Sensors 2015, 15, 22192–22208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Park, J.S.; Cho, S.B. Development of Interdigitated and Chain-Shaped Electrode Array for Electric Cell-Substrate Impedance Sensing. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 11911–11915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Park, J.S.; Hwang, K.S.; Cho, S.B. Dependence of Impedance Measurement Sensitivity of Cell Growth on Sensing Area of Circular Interdigitated Electrode. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 7886–7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Olson, E.J.; Buhlmann, P. Minimizing hazardous waste in the undergraduate analytical laboratory: A microcell for electrochemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 1260–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khafaji, M.; Shahrokhian, S.; Ghalkhani, M. Electrochemistry of levo-thyroxin on edgeplane pyrolytic graphite electrode: Application to sensitive analytical determinations. Electroanalysis 2011, 23, 1875–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fischer, J.; Dejmkova, H.; Barek, J. Electrochemistry of pesticides and its analytical applications. Curr. Org. Chem. 2011, 15, 2923–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vidal, C.V.; Muñoz, A.I. Effect of physico-chemical properties of simulated body fluids on the electrochemical behaviour of CoCrMo alloy. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 8239–8248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wolner, C.; Nauer, G.E.; Trummer, J.; Putz, V.; Tschegg, S. Possible reasons for the unexpected bad biocompatibility of metal-on-metal hip implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2006, 26, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xhoffer, C.; Bergh, K.V.; Dillen, H. Electrochemistry: A powerful analytical tool in steel research. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 2825–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Macdonald, J.R. Impedance spectroscopy. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1992, 20, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Koch, N.; Kahn, A.; Ghijsen, J.; Pireaux, J.J.; Schwartz, J.; Johnson, R.L.; Elschner, A. Conjugated organic molecules on metal versus polymer electrodes: Demonstration of a key energy level alignment mechanism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fisher, G.L.; Walker, A.V.; Hooper, A.E.; Tighe, T.B.; Bahnck, K.B.; Skriba, H.T.; Reinard, M.D.; Haynie, B.C.; Opila, R.L.; Winograd, N.; et al. Bond Insertion, Complexation, and Penetration Pathways of Vapor-Deposited Aluminum Atoms with HO- and CH3O-Terminated Organic Monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5528–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Neto, A.H.C.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N.M.R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lin, Y.M.; Jenkins, K.A.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Small, J.P.; Farmer, D.B.; Avouris, P. Operation of Graphene Transistors at Gigahertz Frequencies. Nano Lett. 2008, 9, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Dharmendar, R.; Leonard, F.R.; Gary, D.C.; Sanjay, K.B. Graphene field-effect transistors. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 313001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Intemann, J.J.; Yao, K.; Li, Y.X.; Yip, H.L.; Xiang, X.Y.; Liang, P.W.; Chueh, C.C.; Ding, F.Z.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; et al. Highly efficient inverted organic solar cells through material and interfacial engineering of indacenodithieno[3,2-b]thiophene-based polymers and devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 24, 1465–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Worley, C.G.; Linton, R.W. Removing sulfur from gold using ultraviolet/ozone cleaning. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1995, 13, 2281–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shadnam, M.R.; Amirfazli, A. Kinetics of alkanethiol monolayer desorption from gold in air. Chem. Commun. 2005, 38, 4869–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shadnam, M.R.; Kirkwood, S.E.; Fedosejevs, R.; Amirfazli, A. Thermo-kinetics study of laser-induced desorption of self-assembled monolayers from gold: Case of Laser Micropatterning. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11996–12002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Campiña, J.M.; Martins, A.; Silva, F. A new cleaning methodology for efficient Au-SAM removal. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 7681–7689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shepherd, J.L.; Kell, A.; Chung, E.; Sinclar, C.W.; Workentin, M.S.; Bizzotto, D. Selective reductive desorption of a SAM-coated gold electrode revealed using fluorescence microscopy. J. Am. Chem Soc. 2004, 126, 8329–8335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pinto, S.M.; Pinzón, E.F.; Meléndez, Á.M.; Méndez-Sánchez, S.; Miranda, D.A. Electrode cleaning and reproducibility of electrical impedance measurements of HeLa cells on aqueous solution. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat. 2020, 44, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kılıç, Y.; Manickham, P.; Bhansali, S. Brief Fine Polishing of Thin-film Gold Electrode Sensors Leads to Better Reproducibility than Electrochemical Pretreatment. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 5067–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Micrux Technologies. Thin-Film (Micro)electrodes Surface Cleaning & Activation; Micrux Technologies: Oviedo, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  54. Carvalhal, R.F.; Freire, R.S.; Kubota, L.T. Polycrystalline Gold Electrodes: A Comparative Study of Pretreatment Procedures Used for Cleaning and Thiol Self-Assembly Monolayer Formation. Electroanalysis 2005, 17, 1251–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Möller, H.; Pistorius, P.C. The electrochemistry of gold-platinum alloys. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 570, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Korin, E.; Froumin, N.; Cohen, S. Surface Analysis of Nanocomplexes by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vitale, F.; Fratoddi, I.; Battocchio, C.; Piscopiello, E.; Tapfer, L.; Russo, M.V.; Polzonetti, G.; Giannini, C. Mono- and bi-functional arenethiols as surfactants for gold nanoparticles: Synthesis and characterization. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Tlili, A.; Abdelghani, A.; Hleli, S.; Maaref, M.A. Electrical Characterization of a Thiol SAM on Gold as a First Step for the Fabrication of Immunosensors based on a Quartz Crystal Microbalance. Sensors 2004, 4, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Nguyen, K.C. Quantitative analysis of COOH-terminated alkanethiol SAMs on gold nanoparticle surfaces. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 045008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Materials 15 02218 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Picture of ICE, a working area microscopic image of ICE containing several fingers, and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of an Au finger of ICE. (b) Deposition of the SAM, removal of the SAM (by NaBH4), and re-deposition of the SAM procedures for the Au surface of ICE, respectively, and the corresponding EIS results at each stage.
Figure 1. (a) Picture of ICE, a working area microscopic image of ICE containing several fingers, and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of an Au finger of ICE. (b) Deposition of the SAM, removal of the SAM (by NaBH4), and re-deposition of the SAM procedures for the Au surface of ICE, respectively, and the corresponding EIS results at each stage.
Materials 15 02218 g001
Materials 15 02218 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) EIS and (b) CV results of ICE, before and after the cleaning process.
Figure 2. (a) EIS and (b) CV results of ICE, before and after the cleaning process.
Materials 15 02218 g002
Materials 15 02218 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) XPS results of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and re-ICE. (b) Deconvolution of the Au 4f spectra of ICE/SAM.
Figure 3. (a) XPS results of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and re-ICE. (b) Deconvolution of the Au 4f spectra of ICE/SAM.
Materials 15 02218 g003
Materials 15 02218 g004 550
Figure 4. FT-IR results of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and re-ICE.
Figure 4. FT-IR results of the ICE, ICE/SAM, and re-ICE.
Materials 15 02218 g004
Materials 15 02218 g005 550
Figure 5. (a–c) EIS, expressed by Nyquist plots, and (d) the CV results of ICE, ICE/SAM, re-ICE, re-ICE/SAM in 1 mM K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl. EIS spectra included the fitting data.
Figure 5. (a–c) EIS, expressed by Nyquist plots, and (d) the CV results of ICE, ICE/SAM, re-ICE, re-ICE/SAM in 1 mM K[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl. EIS spectra included the fitting data.
Materials 15 02218 g005
Materials 15 02218 g006 550
Figure 6. Efficiency percentage (%) for the re-use ICE and the re-deposition SAM. Columns and bars represent the averages and standard deviations of the data (n = 3).
Figure 6. Efficiency percentage (%) for the re-use ICE and the re-deposition SAM. Columns and bars represent the averages and standard deviations of the data (n = 3).
Materials 15 02218 g006
Table
Table 1. EIS parameters of the electrode and the modified electrode, extrapolated by fitting the measured spectra in Figure 5 to the REC.
Table 1. EIS parameters of the electrode and the modified electrode, extrapolated by fitting the measured spectra in Figure 5 to the REC.
ElectrodeRct (kΩ)Cdl (F)Rs (kΩ)
ICE86 ± 1.0(11.8 × 10−7) ± 10−5 0.36 ± 10−4
ICE/SAM1900 ± 0.1(0.53 × 10−7) ± 10−30.35 ± 10−5
re-ICE87 ± 2.0(11.7 × 10−7) ± 10−50.35 ± 10−4
re-ICE/SAM1870 ± 0.1(0.54 × 10−7) ± 10−30.35 ± 10−4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, H.T.N.; Phan, L.M.T.; Cho, S. Removal of Thiol-SAM on a Gold Surface for Re-Use of an Interdigitated Chain-Shaped Electrode. Materials 2022, 15, 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062218

AMA Style

Le HTN, Phan LMT, Cho S. Removal of Thiol-SAM on a Gold Surface for Re-Use of an Interdigitated Chain-Shaped Electrode. Materials. 2022; 15(6):2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Hien T. Ngoc, Le Minh Tu Phan, and Sungbo Cho. 2022. "Removal of Thiol-SAM on a Gold Surface for Re-Use of an Interdigitated Chain-Shaped Electrode" Materials 15, no. 6: 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062218

APA Style

Le, H. T. N., Phan, L. M. T., & Cho, S. (2022). Removal of Thiol-SAM on a Gold Surface for Re-Use of an Interdigitated Chain-Shaped Electrode. Materials, 15(6), 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop