Next Article in Journal
Critical Evaluation and Thermodynamic Re-Optimization of the Si–P and Si–Fe–P Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Computational Materials Design for Ceramic Nuclear Waste Forms Using Machine Learning, First-Principles Calculations, and Kinetics Rate Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Orthogonal Experimental Optimization of Preparation and Microstructural Properties of a Diffusion Barrier for Tantalum-Based Silicide Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of the Effect of Wastewater on the Biological Activity of Mixtures of Fluoxetine and Its Metabolite Norfluoxetine with Nalidixic and Caffeic Acids with Use of E. coli Microbial Bioindicator Strains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 11
10.3390/ma16114094
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress in Preparation, Properties and Applications of Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Composites with “Brick-and-Mortar” Structure

by
Feng Liu
,
Hongyu Yang
* and
Xiaming Feng
*
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(11), 4094; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114094
Submission received: 19 March 2023 / Revised: 16 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The 15th Anniversary of Materials—Recent Advances in Materials Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inspired by nature, materials scientists have been exploring and designing various biomimetic materials. Among them, composite materials with brick-and-mortar-like structure synthesized from organic and inorganic materials (BMOIs) have attracted increasing attention from scholars. These materials have the advantages of high strength, excellent flame retardancy, and good designability, which can meet the requirements of various fields for materials and have extremely high research value. Despite the increasing interest in and applications of this type of structural material, there is still a dearth of comprehensive reviews, leaving the scientific community with a limited understanding of its properties and applications. In this paper, we review the preparation, interface interaction, and research progress of BMOIs, and propose possible future development directions for this class of materials.

1. Introduction

Over the past few centuries of biological evolution, nature has produced numerous astonishing natural materials. This has inspired the design of composite materials, such as biomimetic organic–inorganic composites with a “brick-and-mortar” structure (BMOIs), which take inspiration from nacre. Nacre (Figure 1a) is composed of 95% brittle aragonite platelets and 5% soft biological macromolecules arranged in a highly ordered “brick-and-mortar” structure (Figure 1b) that reveals exceptional mechanical properties [1,2,3,4]. Research on nacre structure [5,6,7] has demonstrated the critical role of its “brick-and-mortar” structure in conferring its superior properties. Xu et al. [8] used atomic force microscopy to study the behavior of biopolymer chains in the nacre and have found that the biopolymer matrix can self-reinforce during deformation. Researchers found that the biopolymer matrix in the nacre has the ability to self-strengthen during deformation. The nacreous structure, the “brick-and-mortar” structure, is able to deflect and inhibit crack propagation, resulting in enhanced toughness and efficient dissipation of mechanical energy [9,10,11,12,13]. Therefore, BMOIs have emerged as a type of composite material with excellent properties and multiple applications, prepared using inorganic materials as “bricks” and organic materials as “mortar” through specific methods.
As early as 1989, Sarikaya et al. [14] proposed the “brick-and-mortar” structure, analyzed its architecture, and subsequently utilized it to design and synthesize synthetically laminated materials. Over the past few decades, corresponding research on BMOIs based on the “brick-and-mortar” structure has become increasingly refined through both theoretical and practical developments. Nowadays, a diverse range of raw materials are utilized, with commonly used inorganic materials including montmorillonite (MMT) and graphene oxide (GO), which possess excellent barrier properties and design flexibility. As early as 2007, Lin et al. [15] developed a “brick-and-mortar”-structured nanocomposite material by incorporating polymers into the interlayer of MMT. In 2011, Putz et al. [16] proposed a method of preparing “brick-and-mortar” structured paper using GO. Moreover, researchers have employed various synthetic methods, such as layer-by-layer assembly (LBL), vacuum filtration (VF), co-extrusion, and freeze casting (FC). Therefore, BMOIs, with their diverse selection of raw materials and synthetic approaches, have enjoyed great expansion in terms of its research and application scope.
In recent years, BMOIs have gained increasing attention and found wide applications in fields such as biomedicine, flame retardancy, and intelligent materials. However, in the existing reviews on relevant topics, most of them include BMOIs as a part of the review without specific targeting. Some research focuses on the mechanical behavior [17] and shear transfer efficiency [18] of nacre. Some consider it as a part of a bionic application review (such as acoustic materials [19], structural materials [20], thermal conductive materials [21], nanochannels [22], energy absorbing materials [23], fiber composites [24,25] and gels [26]). Some incorporate BMOIs as part of certain materials (such as graphene [27,28]) or preparation methods (such as freezing [29,30,31] and self-assembly [32]) reviews, while others only review certain applications of BMOIs (such as oil-repellent and water-repellent materials [33] and biomedical materials [34]). The existing reviews mostly explain certain aspects of BMOIs and cannot provide a comprehensive understanding of them. Therefore, by providing a detailed description of the preparation and applications of BMOIs, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of BMOIs and inspire researchers from different fields to study them.

2. Raw Materials

It is well known that the properties of composite materials are largely influenced by their constituent materials. Common inorganic materials in BMOIs include montmorillonite, graphene oxide and MXene, while organic materials include polyvinyl alcohol, cellulose and its derivatives. Other less commonly used raw materials include chitosan and calcium carbonate. A list of raw materials is presented in Table 1.

2.1. Inorganic Raw Material

2.1.1. Montmorillonite

Montmorillonite (MMT) is an excellent inorganic material that, when introduced into materials, can significantly improve their corrosion resistance, fire resistance, antibacterial activity, adsorption, and other properties. It is commonly used as an adsorbent, catalyst, flame retardant, and carrier. Its structure, exfoliation, preparation, and applications are shown in Figure 2 [49,50]. Due to its rich interface functional groups, MMT can form strong interface interactions with organic materials and is widely studied as an inorganic material in BMOIs.
Peng et al. [35] employed the ice-templating technique to fabricate a nanocomposite material, referred to as PDMS-MMT-L, by introducing MMT and polydimethylsiloxane, resulting in a “brick-and-mortar” structure, as depicted in Figure 3a. The PDMS-MMT-L exhibited a substantial improvement in Young’s modulus and toughness, by 23-fold and 12-fold, respectively, when compared to pure polydimethylsiloxane. The toughening mechanism of the material, involving crack deflection and bridging, was validated by in situ crack tracking and three-dimensional reconstruction, utilizing the pearl-activated PDMS-MMT-L nanocomposite material and confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM), assisted by the aggregation-induced emission (AlE) (Figure 3b).
Guo et al. [36] coupled multifunctional carboxymethyl cellulose to dopamine and assembled it with montmorillonite using a vacuum filtration-assisted method to prepare a “brick-and-mortar structured” material (DAC/MTM, Figure 4a,b). The material was characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), nuclear magnetic resonance NMR, and other tests, and it was found that it could persist in water for more than ten days (good wet-state stability) (Figure 4c), high tensile strength (162.0 MPa), and elastic modulus (8.7 GPa) when the relative humidity reached 90%. In addition, thermal analysis and horizontal flame testing demonstrated that the material also had excellent fire resistance (Figure 4d).
Rahid et al. [37] used a layer-by-layer deposition technique to form a film composed of polyethyleneimine (PEI), montmorillonite, and oligomeric siloxane. The film showed a nearly 65 GPa reduced modulus due to strong electrostatic and hydrogen bonding. Additionally, the material exhibited high hardness and chemical resistance, making it durable over time.

2.1.2. Graphene Oxide

Graphene oxide (GO) is a two-dimensional nanomaterial with controllable size and excellent mechanical, electrical, chemical, and optical properties. It also has excellent modifiability, as its plethora of epoxy functional groups and hydroxyls on the outside allow it to react very easily with other polymers to improve the mechanical properties of materials [51]. In addition, GO has excellent electrical and thermal conductivity, making it a valuable material for applications in electronics, sensors, and energy storage devices. Its optical properties also make it an attractive material for applications in optoelectronics and photonics. This indicates that GO is well-suited as a “brick” for preparing multifunctional BMOIs with mechanical properties.
Chen et al. [38] combined the natural chelating agent phytic acid (PA) with GO, and they were closely linked by hydrogen bonds to form a “brick-and-mortar” structure (Figure 5). Compared with pure GO, the hardness, ultimate strength, maximum Young’s modulus, toughness, and strain energy release rate of the nacre-bio-based composite material (PA/GO) increased by 41.0%, 124.1%, 134.7%, 118.5%, and 150.6%, respectively.
Yu et al. [39] synthesized a composite material substrate named LOG-P by intercalating oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) into Ca-Al layered double hydroxide (Ca-Al-LDH) and GO, and then crosslinked it with 2D polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) to construct a “brick-and-mortar” structure, as shown in Figure 6a. The Young’s modulus of LOG-P in the dehydrated state is about 5 GPa, while it decreases by approximately 99% in the hydrated state, as shown in Figure 6b. Ag circuits were integrated on LOG-P using 3D printing technology to study the electrical stability of microelectronic structures and evaluate the feasibility of LOG-P as a human body implant, as shown in Figure 6c.
Chu et al. [40] successfully grafted a reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/bis (diethoxyphosphoryl) ethane (BTSE) coating onto the surface of magnesium alloy substrate (Figure 7a), while inhibiting corrosion and wear behavior. The coating exhibited a well-arranged biomimetic “bricks and mortar” structure connected by a chemical network, composed of Si-O-C bonds between RGO flakes and Si-O-Si bonds originating from BTSE self-crosslinking reaction. The reduction in porosity and defects made the RGO/BTSE coating highly continuous and intact, and the corrosion rate of the coating was reduced by an order of magnitude compared to the bare Mg substrate and RGO-coated samples due to barrier effect (Figure 7d). Furthermore, the wear resistance of the substrate was found to be improved, as indicated in Figure 7b,e, which was attributed to the directional lubrication effect of reduced graphene oxide flakes. The composite coating also exhibited excellent wear resistance, providing protection against frictional wear of the substrate. The wear rate decreased from 3.5 × 10−3 mm3 N−1 for bare magnesium alloy to 5.13 × 10−5 mm3 N−1 m−1 for RGO/BTSE coated samples (Figure 7c). The interlayer sliding between RGO flakes effectively reduced the friction resistance, although the addition of BTSE weakly increased its shear resistance.

2.1.3. MXene

MXene is a new type of 2D transition metal carbide/nitride material with atomic layer thickness, large electrochemically active surface energy, and excellent mechanical properties. Its general formula can be represented as Mn+1XnTx, where M represents an early transition metal, X represents carbon and/or nitrogen, and Tx represents functional groups attached to the surface of MXene during etching. Its structure is similar to that of graphene. MXene has made exciting achievements in research fields such as hydrogen storage, supercapacitors, and electromagnetic shielding. Shi et al. [41] used hydrophilic 2D titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene nanosheets and highly conductive 1D silver nanowires (AgNWs) as “bricks”, poly(dopamine) (PDA)/Ni2+ as “mortar”, and developed a strain sensor with a “brick-and-mortar structure”, which has ultra-high sensitivity, high strength, and toughness, as shown in the flow chart in Figure 8a and the “brick-and-mortar structure” in Figure 8b,c. Liu et al. [42] used freeze-drying to construct a chitosan/MXene layered structure skeleton embedded in a polyborosiloxane matrix to create a “brick-and-mortar structure” composite material with favorable anti-impact and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding performance. The preparation process and structure schematic are shown in Figure 8d. The material can effectively attenuate 85.9–92.8% of the impact force and has a highly efficient EMI shielding effect of 47.2–71.8 dB.
At times, multiple inorganic materials are used at the same time. Chen et al. [43] used GO, MMT, and wood auto-hydrolysates (WH) to prepare a nanocomposite thin film. The film was strengthened by the synergistic effect of hydrogen bonding and covalent bonding between the three components, resulting in excellent mechanical and fire-resistant properties.

2.2. Organic Raw Material

2.2.1. Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is widely used as a coating material, packaging film, and in the textile industry due to its excellent film-forming and barrier properties. Moreover, its biocompatibility and ability to form hydrogels have made it a subject of extensive research for biomedical applications such as drug delivery and tissue engineering. Therefore, PVA is considered an excellent organic material with diverse potential applications [44,45]. Kou et al. [44] used reduced graphene oxide (CRG) as “bricks” and PVA as “mortar” to prepare a coating (CRG-PVA) with a “brick-and-mortar structure” and outstanding mechanical properties. Kilometers-long fibers were then prepared using continuous wet-spinning assembly technology. The tensile strength of the fiber increased with the PVA content, reaching a maximum of 200 MPa, surpassing other nacre-inspired materials. It was found that the tensile strength of the fibers was not related to the molecular weight of PVA, as molecular motion is confined to the nanochannels between adjacent CRG layers. Wang et al. [45] used polydopamine-wrapped reduced graphene oxide (PDG) as “bricks” and PVA as “mortar” to prepare an artificial nacre nanocomposite material using vacuum-assisted filtration self-assembly technology, as shown in Figure 9. The material’s tensile strength, fracture elongation, and toughness were 327 ± 19.3 MPa, 8 ± 0.2%, and 13.0 ± 0.7 MJ/m3, respectively, which is significantly higher than nacre, mainly due to the “brick-and-mortar” structure of PDG and PVA and the hydrogen bonds between them.

2.2.2. Cellulose and Its Derivatives

The primary skeleton of cellulose is synthesized by plants through photosynthesis, making it an abundant and renewable resource [52]. Cellulose exhibits biodegradability and good chemical modification capabilities, enabling it to meet the design requirements for intermolecular interactions and environmental friendliness for biomaterials of interest. Guan et al. [46] utilized cellulose nanofiber and TiO2-coated mica microplatelets (TiO2-mica) to prepare an environmentally friendly water-based material (CN-TiO2-mica) that combines energy-saving cooling and fire-resistant properties. By employing the “directional fluid assembly” method to construct a “brick-and-mortar structure” (Figure 10a), high infrared reflectivity (about 90%, Figure 10b) can be achieved. The fire resistance can be improved by prolonging the path of oxygen entry into the material (Figure 10c–e). Qiu et al. [47] utilized nanofibrillar cellulose and hydroxyl functionalized black phosphorus to produce a high mechanical strength and highly efficient flame-retardant film. Xu et al. [48] used carboxymethyl cellulose (a cellulose derivative) and nanoclay platelets to prepare a high-tensile-strength, high-transparency, and fire-resistant film.

3. Strategies

3.1. Layer-By-Layer Assembly

The layer-by-layer assembly (LBL) technique, originally proposed by Iler in 1966 [53], has since evolved to include the assembly of multilayer thin films in three dimensions, significantly expanding its applications. This technique is a bottom-up processing method that enables the accurate sort of nanoscale components based on layer-by-layer adsorption, resulting in materials with a clear nanostructure. As such, layer-by-layer assembly has become a commonly used method for creating BMOIs [54]. The layer-by-layer assembly process involves substrate pretreatment, layer deposition driven by a driving force, cleaning between layers to stabilize the layer structure, and cyclic repetition of the process [55,56], as shown in Figure 11.
In a study by Wang and colleagues [57], aluminum oxide/GO-PVA (Al2O3/GO-PVA) nanosheets were used to create artificial pearls. The process involved adding 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane to a solution of water and methanol, stirring until it was fully hydrolyzed, and then adding Al2O3 platelets and sonicated them. After stirring at 40 °C for 30 min, they obtained a suspension that was washed with ethanol (Figure 12). Using this suspension and a GO/PVA dispersion, they alternately dried the films on a glass substrate to produce a thin film, which had superior strength (143 ± 13 MPa) and toughness (9.2 ± 2.7 MJ/m3) compared to nacre. Moreover, the tensile strength of the Al2O3/GO-PVA film was 2.8 times that of the Al2O3/PVA film, and the toughness was about 6 times that of the GO-PVA film. These results suggest that the three-component composite material is effective in achieving a balance between strength and toughness.

3.2. Vacuum Filtration

Vacuum filtration (VF) [58], also referred to as papermaking, is a classical mechanical assembly method that uses a vacuum pump to pass a solution through a filter, ultimately resulting in solid film formation. The primary benefit of this approach is its expandability, which enables it to be used for large-scale manufacturing. However, assembling bulk materials can be time consuming. Wan et al. [59] based their work on GO–molybdenum disulfide (MoS2)–thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). They added the MoS2 and TPU solutions to the GO solution, and after stirring and ultrasound, a suspension was obtained. The artificial nacre layer was obtained by vacuum-assisted filtration and drying, and then immersed in an HI solution for reduction. The final product was obtained by washing with ethanol, as shown in Figure 13. This film not only has high toughness (3.8 times that of natural nacre layer) and strength (1.7 times that of natural pearl layer), it also has high conductivity, making it highly promising in applications such as artificial muscles, tissue engineering, and flexible supercapacitor electrodes.

3.3. Freeze Casting

In seawater, when the water contains impurities, ice crystals can form a mechanism that excludes impurities into the crevices of the ice [60]. Inspired by this appearance, the technology of freeze casting (FC) has emerged. Freeze casting is a technology that enables the formation of ordered, layered porous materials and is currently a commonly used technique for preparing biomimetic “brick-and-mortar” structure [61]. Shao et al. [31] introduced the principles of FC technology in different directions and analyzed the relationship between the process and the structure. As shown in Figure 14, the basic principles of FC technology are first described. FC involves the controlled solidification of solutions, suspensions, sols, or gels, followed by sublimation of the solvent under reduced pressure, and then densification through post-processing. During the controlled solidification process, phase separation occurs as the solvent solidifies, and the resulting solid phase (usually ice) serves as a template.
Munch et al. [62] combined alumina with poly(methyl methacrylate) to form a super-tough, template-structured hybrid ceramic material, with a processing flowchart. The hybrid ceramic material has toughness similar to aluminum alloy. In the past, most FC techniques used isotropic and unidirectional FC, but the nucleation direction of isotropic FC is uncontrollable, and unidirectional FC produces only a near-distance regular multilayer structure. To improve FC technology and establish long-range, regular layered structures, bidirectional FC was developed [63]. Zhao et al. [64] utilized an improved bidirectional FC method and then assembled a GO/PVA composite film using uniaxial extrusion and chemical reduction. Consequently, a composite film was developed that not only had high strength (150.9 MPa), but also toughness (8.50 MJ/m3) and high elongation (10.44%), which is superior to materials prepared by other methods.

3.4. Other Methods

Co-extrusion is a large-scale processing technique utilized to produce “brick-and-mortar” structures comprising ceramics with metallic toughness. In this method, the viscosity of the polymer is reduced by extruding raw material rods through a heated spinneret, resulting in the formation of long fibers collected online by the extrusion head. The co-extruded long fibers, such as NiO-coated Al2O3, are cut into short segments and subjected to transverse deformation by heating and pressing in a mold, followed by bonding to construct a “brick-and-mortar” structure [65,66,67].
3D printing has recently been used in constructing nacre-inspired “brick-and-mortar” structures with complex 3D shapes [68]. Specifically, inorganic materials are arranged in an orderly manner during the 3D printing process, assisted by the application of external fields (electric field, force, electric, magnetic field, etc.). Zhang et al. [69] used sodium alginate (SA) and GO to synthesize a multiresponsive, “brick-and-mortar”-structured sheet that exhibits rapid responses to multiple stimuli (water, heat, light). The 3D-printed pearls are lightweight and exhibit mechanical properties comparable to natural nacre. 3D printing technology has the advantage of producing pearl-like materials with complex three-dimensional shapes that are difficult to obtain by conventional methods, without compromising their scalability and shape-forming ability. However, controlling the microstructure without compromising the expandability and shape-forming ability is a challenge for 3D printing technology.
Advantages and disadvantages (Table 2): FC allows for fine control over layer thickness and mimics some of the nanoscale structural features of nacre. However, it cannot provide fine control over platelet size distribution, especially at scales less than 1 μm. In contrast, LBL assembly technology is suitable for the production of high-precision, regular nanocomposites, resulting in well-defined nanostructures. This not only allows for highly layered and ultra-thin composite materials, but also typically results in strong interfacial bonding and mechanical strength due to close contact between layers. However, due to its multi-step nature, LBL technology is very time consuming and labor intensive. Vacuum filtration is energy efficient, but the synthesized materials often have low density and high porosity, leading to poor mechanical properties.

4. Interfacial Forces

The interface interaction between organic and inorganic materials is an important factor affecting the performance of BMOIs. To adjust the mechanical properties of BMOIs based on the requirements of materials properties and processes, different interface interactions can be constructed. Common interface interactions include covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, and so on. Song et al. [51] investigated the interfacial design and toughening mechanism of GO-based biomimetic mineralized composites (BMOIs). They used GO with different sizes as “bricks”, PVA as “mortar”, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as interfacial reinforcement to prepare four composite materials with the same structure but different interface distributions. By comparing the results of tensile tests with finite element simulation results, they found that the bonding strength and stress level between the hard phase interfaces were the key factors determining the overall mechanical properties of the material/organization.

4.1. Non-Covalent Bonds

4.1.1. Hydrogen Bonds

Hydrogen bonds are among the most frequently encountered and essential intermolecular or intramolecular interactions in molecules [70]. Despite being weak, they can have a profound impact on the aggregation state of a substance by modifying its physical properties, shape, and structure [71]. Dikin et al. [72] prepared ordered layered structures of graphene oxide thin films by filtration method. Due to the hydrogen bonding between GO and water, the GO paper exhibited high mechanical properties with a tensile strength of 133 MPa and a Young’s modulus of 32 GPa.
Kang et al. [73] simulated the structural features of natural nacre by combining (GO) and gelatin (GG) biopolymer and revealed the mechanism of comprehensive mechanical properties. The material was induced to self-assemble into orderly arrangements of nacre-like films through the formation of coordination bonds, ionic bonds, and hydrogen bonds by vacuum filtration, resulting in a strong and tough BMOI with a fracture strength of 88.7 MPa, a fracture strain of 0.84%, a tensile modulus of 25.4 GPa, and good biocompatibility.

4.1.2. Ionic Bonds

Shu et al. [74] used a bottom-up LBL deposition technique to prepare ultra-thin films (LDH/HEP)n with strong electrostatic and hydrogen bonding at the interface of nacre-like heparin (HEP) and layered double hydroxides (LDH), as shown in Figure 15. The HEP/LDH ultra-thin films were densely stacked together, forming a clear “brick-and-mortar” structure, demonstrating significant mechanical property enhancement and good biocompatibility. Compared with previously reported polymer-LDH hybrid films, the film modulus was significantly increased (23 GPa).
Liang et al. [75] prepared a high-performance BMOI with excellent UV-blocking ability, semi-transparency, and mechanical properties. They used a fast and green vacuum filtration method, selecting polyglutamic acid (PGA) as the “mortar” and positively charged NiAl-NO3 LDH nanosheets as the “brick” to prepare the PGA/LDH film through strong electrostatic interaction. Experimental results including XRD, FT-IR, and tensile tests indicated that the artificial pearl had a layered “brick-and-mortar” structure, excellent strength (93.5 MPa), and flexibility (easy to bend and fold).

4.1.3. π-π Bonds

Graphene, with its SP2 hybridized structure, has strong stability due to π-π bonding. Similarly, BMOI with strong stability can be constructed through π-π interactions of GO. Zhang et al. [76] synthesized poly (acrylic acid) and 3-aminophenylboronic acid to form PAPBx, and then used room-temperature casting and drying method to prepare a GO hydrogel with a thickness of 10~12 μm by enhancing the π-π interactions between PAPBx and GO nanosheets. The gel prepared at a PAPBx concentration of 4% showed excellent tensile strength, fracture strain, and toughness, which were 382 ± 12 MPa, 4.31 ± 0.08%, and 7.50 ± 0.40 MJ m−3, respectively. Zhang et al. [77] used a π-π stacking supramolecular method to fix phthalocyanine derivative-2,11,20,29-tetra-tert-butyl-2,3-naphthalocyanine (NPc) on GO to form a layered GO-NPc hybrid, as shown in Figure 16. Adsorption and fluorescence spectroscopy analyses confirmed the existence of π-π interactions between GO and NPC, making the GO stable under environmental conditions. Fluorescence and photo-response measurements also showed that this hybrid material could be used as an effective photoelectric conversion material for photoelectric applications.

4.2. Covalent Bonds

Although the aforementioned non-covalent bonds can significantly improve the mechanical properties, they are easily disrupted in solution, salt, and pH values [78]. To expand the application of BMOIs, it is necessary to use stronger covalent bonds to prepare BMOIs. Common covalent bonds include amide bonds and boronic ester bonds. Liu et al. [79] utilized a vacuum-evaporation self-assembly technique to insert graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets into a Soy protein isolate (SPI)-glycerin (Gly) matrix, developing a biomimetic composite material film that solves the problems of poor mechanical performance and water resistance of SPI. The composite material (SPI-Gly) constructed a “brick-and-mortar” structure through hydrogen bonds and amide bonds, resulting in improved tensile strength and modulus. After chemical reduction, SPI-Gly rGO was obtained, with further improvements in tensile strength (50.03 ± 2.67 MPa) and modulus (1.7 ± 0.07 GPa). Meanwhile, the SPI-Gly rGO film can maintain its original shape in water for up to one year, as shown in Figure 17. An et al. [80] formed a rigid-layered GO–borate BMOI by borate salt cross-linking. The results showed that the strength of the oxidized graphene film increased by nearly 25% to 160 ± 18 MPa with the addition of 0.94 wt% borate salt, and the stiffness increased by more than 255%.

5. Properties and Application

5.1. Light Weight and High Strength

The adoption of a “brick-and-mortar” architecture has been demonstrated to provide exceptional mechanical robustness to biomimetic materials composed of intercalated nanosheets. Remarkably, several of these materials have even outperformed natural nacre in terms of mechanical strength, meeting the high demands of materials for fields such as construction, aviation, and biomedical engineering that require high strength and low weight. Hao and colleagues [81] used genipin crosslinking, hyperbranched poly (amido amine) (HPAMAM), and clay nanosheets to prepare a tough biomimetic composite membrane (G-HPAMAM/nanoclay) through SEM observation with highly ordered structures (Figure 18a), similar to those of natural nacre and nacre-like composite materials. FT-IR testing (Figure 18b) revealed a peak at 1278 cm−1, indicating the presence of genipin in the pearl-like composite material, and the vibration peaks near 1540 cm−1 were weakened, while those near 1645 cm−1 were relatively enhanced. These results indicate that an amide connection was formed between genipin and HPAMAM. As shown in Figure 18c, the biomimetic composite membrane had two relaxation peaks in the loss modulus at −40 °C and 7 °C, respectively, with the peak at −40 °C indicating strong mobility of HPAMAM molecules, and the broader peak at 7 °C suggesting that the relaxation time distribution of HPAMAM/nanoclay was wide, but could be inhibited by an increase in genipin concentration. As shown in Figure 18d, the diffraction peaks of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay were shifted more significantly compared with those of the uncrosslinked composite material, indicating a reduction in the interlayer spacing of clay nanosheets. The interaction between HPAMAM and clay nanosheets was stronger after crosslinking because the close binding of HPAMAM molecules resulted in a shorter distance between the clay nanosheets. This suggests that the biomimetic composite membrane has good flexibility. Finally, the fracture toughness of the biomimetic composite membrane was as high as 5.03 MJ/m3, and the mechanical strength was 152.9 MPa, far exceeding that of nacre.

5.2. Flame Retardant

In recent years, research on “brick-and-mortar” structures in the field of flame retardancy has rapidly gained popularity. The flame-retardant effect of these structures is mainly achieved by forming a barrier on the surface, isolating the substrate from contact with air, and simultaneously inhibiting heat conduction. The materials can be applied in fields such as construction and electronics that are prone to fire due to its high flame retardancy. By reducing the probability of fire occurrence, it can help to minimize casualties and property damage caused by fires.
Carosio et al. [82] prepared “brick-and-mortar”-structure composite materials using transparent cellulose nanofiber/clay nanocomposites, which can be applied as a fire retardant coating for wood. This coating not only enhances the fire resistance of the wood, but also has a certain degree of optical transparency. The flame-retardant performance was evaluated using cone calorimetry. When exposed to a typical 35 kW/m2 heat flux, the ignition time of the coated wood sample was improved to about 4.5 min, and the maximum average heat release rate was reduced by 46%, the total heat release during combustion was reduced by 33%, thereby significantly reducing the potential fire hazard of the wood structure.
Meanwhile, Sun et al. [83] used chloromagnesite cement as a substitute for traditional adhesives and D-gluconic acid sodium salt as a waterproof modifier in the preparation of laminated veneer lumber (LVL) to produce a “brick-and-mortar”-structure LVL with high strength and flame retardancy. The fracture strength of the LVL was about 101 MPa, which is equivalent to that of LVL produced with currently available commercial adhesives. Cone calorimetry testing showed a significant decrease in heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), smoke production rate (SPR), and total smoke production (TSP), as shown in Figure 19.
Carosio et al. [84] obtained compressed chitosan/montmorillonite complexes by directly mixing solutions/suspensions of opposite charges, deposited multilayer coatings using the LBL deposition technique, and then coated the coatings onto acrylic fabrics using a simple doctor-blade coating technique. The structure of the composite was studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and it was found that oriented clay nanoplatelets were continuously bonded together by the chitosan matrix. Increasing the coating loading to above 10% improved the uniformity of the surface coverage. The coating with a loading of over 10% endowed the fabric with self-extinguishing ability in flame retardancy tests. Cone calorimetry tests showed that the ignition time was prolonged (up to 46%), the heat release rate was significantly reduced (the peak heat release rate and total heat release rate were up to −62% and −49%, respectively), and the total smoke release was also reduced (up to −49%), as shown in Figure 20.
Zhong et al. [85] developed a material with ultra-high strength and stiffness using injection molding and a combination of organophilic ultrathin γ-Al(OH)3 (O-gibbsite) single-crystal nanoplatelets, all-hydrocarbon composites, and extended-chain ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). The material is constructed with O-gibbsite as bricks and UHMWPE as mortar. The tensile strength of the material reached 200 MPa, and the notched Izod impact strength was 28 kJ/m2, significantly better than other commercial HDPE and hydrocarbon matrix (All-PE) materials. Despite the high combustibility of hydrocarbons, the material still exhibited good flame retardancy. Inspired by the natural pearl layer, Qiu et al. [47] proposed a bio-inspired nanocomposite material composed of nanofiber cellulose (NFC) and a few layers of hydroxyl-functionalized black phosphorus (BP-OH) using a vacuum-assisted filtration self-assembly process. The two-dimensional (2D) BP-OH dispersed well in the one-dimensional (1D) NFC and had a strong interface hydrogen bond, resulting in the composite film having excellent tensile strength and elongation at break, reaching 214.0 MPa and 23.8%, respectively. The material also exhibited high heat and fire resistance, as shown in Figure 21.
Peng et al. [86] used a vacuum-assisted filtration self-assembly process to achieve synergistic toughening of GO and MMT nanoplates and prepared a PO-MMT-PVA multifunctional ternary bio-inspired nanocomposite material. The synergistic toughening effect of graphene oxide and MMT nanoplates successfully realized the integration of strong and tough ternary bio-inspired nanocomposite materials, with a tensile strength of 356.0 MPa and toughness of 7.5 MJ/m3, which is superior to most binary graphene oxide-based layered materials. At the same time, the biomimetic nanocomposite material exhibits excellent flame retardancy. When used as a protective layer for silkworm cocoons, it can protect the cocoon from ignition for at least 5 min, as shown in Figure 22.

5.3. Responsive

Many responsive materials in BMOIs are highly sensitive to external environmental factors such as temperature and water, which is perfectly suited for the requirements of smart devices. Smart devices are primarily designed to automatically provide corresponding feedback based on changes in the external environment, achieving an intelligent purpose. This causes BMOIs to have great potential in the field of smart devices. Ma et al. [87] developed a fire warning sensor that can be used before combustion. They used a low-temperature evaporation assembly method, with GO and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as the substrate, to prepare a “brick-and-mortar”-structure imitation pearl paper by utilizing hydrogen bonding and electrostatic attraction between GO and ATP molecules. Then, a fire alarm sensor was designed based on the high-temperature thermal reduction characteristics of graphene oxide, as shown in Figure 23. The material not only has a fast flame detection response (1.36 s) and a long continuous alarm time (1300 s) in paper containing 50 wt% ATP, but also exhibits flexibility, flame retardancy, thermal insulation performance, and charring performance.
Yuan et al. [88] developed a boron-modified graphene oxide (GO-BA) paper for use in early fire alarm sensors using a green and easy-to-evaporate self-assembly method. The method has advantages such as simplicity, low cost, and environmental friendliness. The material uses GO as brick and boric acid (BA) as mortar to construct a “brick-and-mortar” structure through hydrogen bonds between them. Notably, the insulating GO-BA paper can rapidly thermally reduce to electrically conductive reduced graphene oxide (rGO) when exposed to flames, providing an ideal fire alarm response time of ~0.8 s. The alarm mechanism is shown in Figure 24. Furthermore, the oxidized boron formed under the flame attack covers the surface of the GO paper, suppressing further oxidation of the GO paper while insulating it from the external environment, thereby enhancing the material’s flame-retardant properties.

5.4. Electromagnetic Shielding

BMOIs exhibit excellent electromagnetic shielding performance, which can effectively address the issue of mutual interference among electronic components caused by magnetic fields generated by electric currents. Sun and colleagues [89] successfully synthesized Ti3C2Tx MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films with outstanding electromagnetic shielding properties using vacuum-assisted filtration in a vacuum, and prepared MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films with varying volume ratios of MXene and xanthan (designated as MXF1-MXF5). The synthesis route is depicted in Figure 25a. The SEM images (Figure 25b–g) clearly show a layered structure, whereas the xanthan gum film lacks such a structure, indicating the formation of a highly organized “brick-and-mortar” structure. The electrical conductivity of the composite films was significantly improved compared to previous reports on MXene-based composite films (361,066 ± 2084–187 ± 6.6 S m−1 from MXF1 to MXF5), and the films also exhibited high tensile strength (up to 121.09 ± 7.96 MPa for MXF5), as demonstrated in Figure 25h.

5.5. Anti-Corrosion

Exposure to the external environment can cause corrosion and deteriorate the properties of materials over time, especially for materials that come into contact with corrosive liquids. The anti-corrosion materials in BMOIs can effectively prevent this problem and can be used as coatings for materials placed outdoors for a long time, containers that come into contact with corrosive liquids, and so on. Wang et al. [90] prepared a novel bioinspired material, B-GO/wSBRc, by using graphene oxide (GO) and waterborne styrene butadiene rubber (wSBR), which exhibited excellent anti-corrosion properties. As shown in Figure 26a–d, the Epit values of B-GO/wSBRc were reduced to a certain extent. The corrosion current density obtained by Tafel extrapolation method and corrosion potential (Figure 26e) clearly showed that with the increase in GO content, the Ecorr value gradually increased in the first (from −1.07 V/SCE to −0.21 V/SCE), second (from −1.07 V/SCE to −0.31 V/SCE) and third stages (from −1.07 V/SCE to −0.36 V/SCE). This indicates that layered graphene oxide can effectively enhance the anti-corrosion ability of wSBRc. The main mechanism for the enhancement of anti-corrosion includes: (1) B-GO/wSBRc cured at low temperature has no micro-pores, which can efficiently block the electrolyte from contacting the substrate; (2) GO can be well dispersed in wSBRc and maximize the diffusion path; and (3) π-π stacking between GO and wSBRc enhances their interaction.

5.6. Other

Zhu et al. [91] prepared a biomimetic “brick-and-mortar”-structure composite film using vacuum filtration and konjac glucomannan–montmorillonite (KGM-MTT). The optical transparency and mechanical properties (tensile strength of 116 MPa) of the KGM-MTT composite film were significantly improved. The prepared composite film had a pearl-like “brick-and-mortar” structure with good transparency and mechanical properties. Under humid conditions, the pearl-like KGM-MTT film had a transparency of 20–50% in the visible spectrum, while the traditional KGM-MTT hybrid film had a transparency of 5–9%, as shown in Figure 27a–e. The ultimate tensile strength of the artificial pearl film was 2–3 times higher than that of films prepared by conventional methods. The cytotoxicity evaluation showed that the prepared KGM-MTT film was biocompatible, as shown in Figure 27f–i. Furthermore, this nacre-like KGM-MTT composite film can serve as a platform for introducing Ag nanoparticles, providing broad potential for antibacterial applications of such films, as shown in Figure 27j,k. In summary, KGM-MTT composite films impregnated with silver nanoparticles are very useful materials in food packaging and healthcare systems.
Liang et al. [92] successfully prepared a novel GP-reinforced MMT-CS-GP-OH composite material using a self-assembly process based on evaporation, with the use of GP (genipin), CS (chitosan), and MMT. They systematically studied the relationship between MMT content, CS-GP crosslinking, pH value, and the mechanical properties and interface interactions of the composite film. The results showed that the biologically inspired nano-composite material prepared had a synergistic effect originating from hydrogen bonds and covalent bonds, making its tensile strength 226 MPa and toughness 5.1 MJ/m3. Moreover, since GP is a natural crosslinker that can spontaneously react with CS to produce a deep blue pigment, the artificial pearl has excellent anti-UV universality (10.0% at 365 nm), as shown in Figure 28. Therefore, this integrated nacre-like MMT-CS nano-composite material is likely to be used in aerospace, biomedical and industrial fields in future.
Dai et al. [93] prepared an underwater super-oleophobic hybrid mesh (GO-CaCO3) through LBL of GO and calcium carbonate (CaCO3). They verified its oil–water separation ability using a homemade oil–water separation device, as shown in Figure 29a. The solution in the figure is a mixture of cyclohexane and water, and is stained with Sudan III and methylene blue for observation. As seen in the figure, water can quickly pass through the hybrid mesh while cyclohexane cannot, achieving the purpose of oil–water separation. Additionally, by replacing cyclohexane with other oils and calculating the water flux and separation efficiency, the results in Figure 29b indicate that the hybrid mesh exhibits high separation efficiency and water flux far exceeding that of other studies for a certain oil–water mixture. Moreover, after multiple cycles of oil–water separation experiments, the hybrid mesh maintained excellent separation efficiency, as shown in Figure 29c. The hybrid mesh can be widely applied in the field of oily wastewater treatment.
BMOIs have far-reaching applications beyond their current applications (Table 3). For instance, Chen et al. [94] developed a highly transparent and oil-repellent film using CS and CaCO3, which could be applied to swimming goggles and lenses. Du et al. [95] produced self-healing and shape-programmable structural materials using a thermally switchable Diels-Alder network polymer and alumina, which could meet the shape demands of different parts of the human body (Figure 30). Although BMOIs have been widely applied in various fields, the current research mainly focuses on their properties, and further exploration of their potential applications is needed.

6. Conclusions

One of the important components of composite materials is BMOIs, which greatly expand the application of composite materials. Inspired by the nacreous layer of pearls, BMOIs utilize organic substances as “mortar” and inorganic substances as “bricks”, which are connected in alternation to form a highly regular “brick-and-mortar” structure that provides BMOIs with exceptional mechanical and barrier properties. The diversity of raw materials and design of interfacial forces can make BMOIs multifunctional and meet the demands of various fields. Compared with conventional composite materials, BMOIs not only provide excellent mechanical properties such as high strength and toughness, but also offers UV resistance, flame retardancy, and corrosion resistance.
It is well known that the choice of raw materials has a significant impact in the performance of composite materials. The inorganic materials of BMOIs mainly include MMT and GO, which can provide the material with high mechanical properties and barrier properties, meeting the needs of high strength, toughness, fire resistance, and corrosion resistance. Additionally, GO exhibits excellent electrical properties and can also enable BMOI to have a place in materials fields such as capacitors and electrodes.
In the previous discussion, we detailed the interfacial interaction forces, including non-covalent bonds (hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, and π-π interactions) and covalent bonds. Different interfacial forces can be designed based on different raw materials, with varying bond strengths. Generally, covalent bonds are more stable and suitable for materials requiring high strength, while adding other non-covalent bonds can further enhance the performance. In order to simplify production processes, yield, and other requirements, non-covalent bonds such as hydrogen bonds can be chosen. Therefore, BMOIs have high designability and can be adjusted according to design requirements.
The synthesis methods described earlier can all produce high-strength and high-toughness BMOIs, but each strategy has its advantages and disadvantages. FC allows for fine control of the thickness of layers and can simulate some of the nanoscale structural features of nacre, but it cannot provide a finely controlled platelet size distribution, especially at scales below 1μm. In contrast, LBL enables high-precision ordering of nanoscale building blocks, producing well-defined nanostructures. It not only allows for highly laminated and ultra-thin composite materials, but the close contact between layers typically results in high interfacial bonding and mechanical strength. However, due to its multi-step nature, the LBL technique is time and effort consuming. VF is energy efficient, but the synthesized materials often have low density and high porosity, resulting in poor mechanical properties.
As research on BMOIs continues to develop, its applications have been further expanded, not only in traditional material fields but also in smart materials, drug delivery, aerospace, and other areas. In the future, the high performance and designability of BMOIs will enable it to expand into even more fields.
Currently, there are still many common challenges in the research field of BMOIs. Firstly, different preparation methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. The LBL method is time consuming and labor intensive, the control accuracy of low-scale FC is insufficient, the mechanical performance of vacuum filtration is relatively weak, and the scale limitations of 3D printing technology are also problematic. Therefore, one of the main directions of future research is to optimize the design and synthesize an efficient, green, simple, high-precision, large-scale, and low-cost synthesis strategy. Secondly, there is insufficient research on functionalized BMOIs, and in the future, BMOIs should not only have excellent mechanical properties but also possess other properties such as self-healing and shape-changing capabilities to meet the requirements of a wider range of fields. Despite the many problems and challenges faced by BMOIs, they can be foreseen that it will be one of the development directions for high-performance, multifunctional materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L. and H.Y.; Writing—original draft preparation, F.L.; Writing—review and editing, F.L.; Supervision, H.Y. and X.F. Funding acquisition, H.Y. and X.F.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2020CDJQY-A006), the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Civil Engineering Materials (2022CEM004) and the Graduate Scientific Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing (CYS22007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, H.; Ji, B.; Jäger, I.L.; Arzt, E.; Fratzl, P. Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5597–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barthelat, F. Biomimetics for next generation materials. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2007, 365, 2907–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heinemann, F.; Launspach, M.; Gries, K.; Fritz, M. Gastropod nacre: Structure, properties and growth—Biological, chemical and physical basics. Biophys. Chem. 2011, 153, 126–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bai, H.; Walsh, F.; Gludovatz, B.; Delattre, B.; Huang, C.; Chen, Y.; Tomsia, A.P.; Ritchie, R.O. Bioinspired Hydroxyapatite/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Composite with a Nacre-Mimetic Architecture by a Bidirectional Freezing Method. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, R.; Gupta, H.S. Deformation and fracture mechanisms of bone and nacre. In Annual Review of Materials Research, Vol. 41; Clarke, D.R., Fratzl, P., Eds.; Annual Reviews: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2011; Volume 41, pp. 41–73. ISBN 978-0-8243-1741-6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yao, N.; Epstein, A.K.; Liu, W.W.; Sauer, F.; Yang, N. Organic–inorganic interfaces and spiral growth in nacre. J. R. Soc. Interface 2008, 6, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, X.; Xu, Z.-H.; Wang, R. In Situ Observation of Nanograin Rotation and Deformation in Nacre. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2301–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, Z.-H.; Li, X. Deformation Strengthening of Biopolymer in Nacre. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 3883–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, K.; Song, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, Z.; Gong, X.; He, L.; Yao, H.-B.; Ni, Y. A Prestressing Strategy Enabled Synergistic Energy-Dissipation in Impact-Resistant Nacre-Like Structures. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2104867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tan, G.; Yu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ritchie, R.O. Compression fatigue properties and damage mechanisms of a bioinspired nacre-like ceramic-polymer composite. Scr. Mater. 2021, 203, 114089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, L.; He, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, H. Maximum utilization of nacre-mimetic composites by architecture manipulation and interface modification towards critical damage state. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2023, 233, 109893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tan, G.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, L.; Jiao, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ritchie, R.O. Nature-Inspired Nacre-Like Composites Combining Human Tooth-Matching Elasticity and Hardness with Exceptional Damage Tolerance. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1904603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Peng, J.; Huang, C.; Cao, C.; Saiz, E.; Du, Y.; Dou, S.; Tomsia, A.P.; Wagner, H.D.; Jiang, L.; Cheng, Q. Inverse Nacre-like Epoxy-Graphene Layered Nanocomposites with Integration of High Toughness and Self-Monitoring. Matter 2020, 2, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarikaya, M.; Gunnison, K.E.; Yasrebi, M.; Aksay, I.A. Mechanical property-microstructural relationships in abalone shell. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 1989, 174, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, W.; Wang, C.; Le, H.; Long, B.; Huang, Y. Special assembly of laminated nanocomposite that mimics nacre. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Biomim. Supramol. Syst. 2008, 28, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Putz, K.W.; Compton, O.C.; Segar, C.; An, Z.; Nguyen, S.T.; Brinson, L.C. Evolution of Order During Vacuum-Assisted Self-Assembly of Graphene Oxide Paper and Associated Polymer Nanocomposites. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6601–6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Du, F.; Alghamdi, S.; Yang, J.; Huston, D.; Tan, T. Interfacial Mechanical Behavior in Nacre of Red Abalone and Other Shells: A Review. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cilento, F.; Martone, A.; Giordano, M. Insights on Shear Transfer Efficiency in “Brick-and-Mortar” Composites Made of 2D Carbon Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dal Poggetto, V.F. Bioinspired acoustic metamaterials: From natural designs to optimized structures. Front. Mater. 2023, 10, 1176457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dai, H.; Dai, W.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, G.; Guo, R. Advanced Composites Inspired by Biological Structures and Functions in Nature: Architecture Design, Strengthening Mechanisms, and Mechanical-Functional Responses. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2207192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Q.; Ma, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Feng, J.; Chevali, V.; Song, P. Recent advances in nacre-inspired anisotropic thermally conductive polymeric nanocomposites. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 1362–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hao, J.; Wang, W.; Zhao, J.; Che, H.; Chen, L.; Sui, X. Construction and application of bioinspired nanochannels based on two-dimensional materials. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 2291–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ingrole, A.; Aguirre, T.G.; Fuller, L.; Donahue, S.W. Bioinspired energy absorbing material designs using additive manufacturing. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 119, 104518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Plocher, J.; Mencattelli, L.; Narducci, F.; Pinho, S. Learning from nature: Bio-inspiration for damage-tolerant high-performance fibre-reinforced composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 208, 108669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Doineau, E.; Cathala, B.; Benezet, J.-C.; Bras, J.; Le Moigne, N. Development of Bio-Inspired Hierarchical Fibres to Tailor the Fibre/Matrix Interphase in (Bio)composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shahsavari, R.; Hwang, S.H. Bioinspired Cementitious Materials: Main Strategies, Progress, and Applications. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ding, J.; Zhao, H.; Yu, H. Bioinspired strategies for making superior graphene composite coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 134808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naveen, J.; Jawaid, M.; Goh, K.L.; Reddy, D.M.; Muthukumar, C.; Loganathan, T.M.; Reshwanth, K.N.G.L. Advancement in Graphene-Based Materials and Their Nacre Inspired Composites for Armour Applications—A Review. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deville, S.; Tomsia, A.P.; Meille, S. Complex Composites Built through Freezing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1492–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gao, W.; Wang, M.; Bai, H. A review of multifunctional nacre-mimetic materials based on bidirectional freeze casting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 109, 103820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shao, G.; Hanaor, D.A.H.; Shen, X.; Gurlo, A. Freeze Casting: From Low-Dimensional Building Blocks to Aligned Porous Structures—A Review of Novel Materials, Methods, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lossada, F.; Hoenders, D.; Guo, J.; Jiao, D.; Walther, A. Self-Assembled Bioinspired Nanocomposites. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 2622–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khayrani, A.C.; Sambudi, N.S.; Wijaya, H.; Buys, Y.F.; Radini, F.A.; Jusoh, N.; Kamal, N.A.; Suhaimi, H. Review of Artificial Nacre for Oil–Water Separation. Separations 2023, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H. Biomimetic Mineralization: From Microscopic to Macroscopic Materials and Their Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peng, J.; Tomsia, A.P.; Jiang, L.; Tang, B.Z.; Cheng, Q. Stiff and tough PDMS-MMT layered nanocomposites visualized by AIE luminogens. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, T.; Gu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Jiang, B.; Zhao, H.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, H. Bioinspired self-assembled films of carboxymethyl cellulose–dopamine/montmorillonite. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 14033–14041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rashid, A.; Haider, R.; Gill, R.; Batool, S.; Hu, Y. Nacre inspired tailoring of mechanically strong hydrophobic coatings through Layer-by-Layer assembly. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 404, 126458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, K.; Zhang, S.; Li, A.; Tang, X.; Li, L.; Guo, L. Bioinspired Interfacial Chelating-like Reinforcement Strategy toward Mechanically Enhanced Lamellar Materials. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4269–4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, C.-S.; Chen, S.-Y.; Lin, J.-S.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Huang, W.-C. Highly hydroresponsive nacre-like oligo proanthocyanidin-intercalated Ca-Al-Layered double hydroxides/graphene oxide/polyvinyl alcohol as a potential neural implant material. J. Mater. Res. Technol. JMRT 2021, 15, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chu, J.H.; Tong, L.B.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Z.H.; Sun, G.X.; Zou, D.N.; Wang, K.S.; Zhang, H.J. Sequentially bridged biomimetic graphene-based coating via covalent bonding with an effective anti-corrosion/wear protection for Mg alloy. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 610, 125707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, X.; Wang, H.; Xie, X.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, J.; Kang, S.; Wang, C.; Liang, J.; Chen, Y. Bioinspired Ultrasensitive and Stretchable MXene-Based Strain Sensor via Nacre-Mimetic Microscale “Brick-and-Mortar” Architecture. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, S.; Wang, S.; Sang, M.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Xuan, S.; Gong, X. Nacre-Mimetic Hierarchical Architecture in Polyborosiloxane Composites for Synergistically Enhanced Impact Resistance and Ultra-Efficient Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 19067–19086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, G.-G.; Hu, Y.-J.; Peng, F.; Bian, J.; Li, M.-F.; Yao, C.-L.; Sun, R.-C. Fabrication of strong nanocomposite films with renewable forestry waste/montmorillonite/reduction of graphene oxide for fire retardant. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kou, L.; Gao, C. Bioinspired design and macroscopic assembly of poly(vinyl alcohol)-coated graphene into kilometers-long fibers. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4370–4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Ma, P.; Bai, H.; Chen, M.; Dong, W.; Xie, Y.; Deshmukh, Y.S. Superior Performance of Artificial Nacre Based on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4215–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guan, Q.-F.; Yang, H.-B.; Yin, C.-H.; Han, Z.-M.; Yang, K.-P.; Ling, Z.-C.; Yu, S.-H. Nacre-Inspired Sustainable Coatings with Remarkable Fire-Retardant and Energy-Saving Cooling Performance. ACS Mater. Lett. 2021, 3, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qiu, S.; Ren, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, T.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. Nacre-Inspired Black Phosphorus/Nanofibrillar Cellulose Composite Film with Enhanced Mechanical Properties and Superior Fire Resistance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 36639–36651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, P.; Erdem, T.; Eiser, E. A simple approach to prepare self-assembled, nacre-inspired clay/polymer nanocomposites. Soft Matter 2020, 16, 5497–5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, S.Q.; Niu, Y.Q.; Liu, J.H.; Chen, X.X.; Li, C.S.; Gates, W.P.; Zhou, C.H. Functional Montmorillonite/Polymer Coatings. Clays Clay Min. 2022, 70, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, X.X.; Liu, J.H.; Kurniawan, A.; Li, K.J.; Zhou, C.H. Inclusion of organic species in exfoliated montmorillonite nanolayers towards hierarchical functional inorganic–organic nanostructures. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 9819–9841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, C.; Li, Y.; Luan, Y.; Liu, S.; Guo, Z.; Xu, F. Study on the strengthening and toughening design of the interlayer interface of GO-based bionic nacre composites and its optimization mechanisms. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 223, 109423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.-P.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Iler, R.K. Multilayers of colloidal particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1966, 21, 569–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yaraghi, N.A.; Kisailus, D. Biomimetic Structural Materials: Inspiration from Design and Assembly. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2018, 69, 23–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, C.; Cheng, Q. Learning from nacre: Constructing polymer nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 150, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Podsiadlo, P.; Kaushik, A.K.; Arruda, E.M.; Waas, A.M.; Shim, B.S.; Xu, J.; Nandivada, H.; Pumplin, B.G.; Lahann, J.; Ramamoorthy, A.; et al. Ultrastrong and stiff layered polymer nanocomposites. Science 2007, 318, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, J.; Qiao, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, L. Bioinspired Hierarchical Alumina–Graphene Oxide–Poly(vinyl alcohol) Artificial Nacre with Optimized Strength and Toughness. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 9281–9286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Magrini, T.; Bouville, F.; Lauria, A.; Le Ferrand, H.; Niebel, T.P.; Studart, A.R. Transparent and tough bulk composites inspired by nacre. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wan, S.; Li, Y.; Peng, J.; Hu, H.; Cheng, Q.; Jiang, L. Synergistic Toughening of Graphene Oxide–Molybdenum Disulfide–Thermoplastic Polyurethane Ternary Artificial Nacre. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Macchetta, A.; Turner, I.G.; Bowen, C.R. Fabrication of HA/TCP scaffolds with a graded and porous structure using a camphene-based freeze-casting method. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deville, S.; Saiz, E.; Nalla, R.K.; Tomsia, A.P. Freezing as a Path to Build Complex Composites. Science 2006, 311, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Munch, E.; Launey, M.E.; Alsem, D.H.; Saiz, E.; Tomsia, A.P.; Ritchie, R.O. Tough, Bio-Inspired Hybrid Materials. Science 2008, 322, 1516–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bai, H.; Chen, Y.; Delattre, B.; Tomsia, A.P.; Ritchie, R.O. Bioinspired large-scale aligned porous materials assembled with dual temperature gradients. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhao, N.; Yang, M.; Zhao, Q.; Gao, W.; Xie, T.; Bai, H. Superstretchable Nacre-Mimetic Graphene/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Composite Film Based on Interfacial Architectural Engineering. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4777–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wilkerson, R.P.; Gludovatz, B.; Watts, J.; Tomsia, A.P.; Hilmas, G.E.; Ritchie, R.O. A Novel Approach to Developing Biomimetic (“Nacre-Like”) Metal-Compliant-Phase (Nickel–Alumina) Ceramics through Coextrusion. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10061–10067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wilkerson, R.P.; Gludovatz, B.; Ell, J.; Watts, J.; Hilmas, G.E.; Ritchie, R.O. High-temperature damage-tolerance of coextruded, bioinspired (“nacre-like”), alumina/nickel compliant-phase ceramics. Scr. Mater. 2019, 158, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wilkerson, R.P.; Gludovatz, B.; Watts, J.; Tomsia, A.P.; Hilmas, G.E.; Ritchie, R.O. A study of size effects in bioinspired, “nacre-like”, metal-compliant-phase (nickel-alumina) coextruded ceramics. Acta Mater. 2018, 148, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Chu, M.; Sun, H.; Jin, J.; Yu, K.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, Y. Electrically assisted 3D printing of nacre-inspired structures with self-sensing capability. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Jian, M.; Wang, C.; Liang, X.; Niu, J.; Zhang, Y. Spontaneous Alignment of Graphene Oxide in Hydrogel during 3D Printing for Multistimuli-Responsive Actuation. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Y.-Q.; Yu, T.; Yang, T.-Y.; Zheng, L.-X.; Liao, K. Bio-Inspired Nacre-like Composite Films Based on Graphene with Superior Mechanical, Electrical, and Biocompatible Properties. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3426–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wan, S.; Hu, H.; Peng, J.; Li, Y.; Fan, Y.; Jiang, L.; Cheng, Q. Nacre-inspired integrated strong and tough reduced graphene oxide–poly(acrylic acid) nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 5649–5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dikin, D.A.; Stankovich, S.; Zimney, E.J.; Piner, R.D.; Dommett, G.H.B.; Evmenenko, G.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 2007, 448, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kang, D.; Cai, Z.; Jin, Q.; Zhang, H. Bio-inspired composite films with integrative properties based on the self-assembly of gellan gum-graphene oxide crosslinked nanohybrid building blocks. Carbon 2015, 91, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shu, Y.; Yin, P.; Liang, B.; Wang, S.; Gao, L.; Wang, H.; Guo, L. Layer by layer assembly of heparin/layered double hydroxide completely renewable ultrathin films with enhanced strength and blood compatibility. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 21667–21672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liang, B.; Shu, Y.; Yin, P.; Guo, L. Nacre-inspired polyglutamic acid/layered double hydroxide bionanocomposite film with high mechanical, translucence and UV-blocking properties. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2017, 35, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, M.; Huang, L.; Chen, J.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Ultratough, Ultrastrong, and Highly Conductive Graphene Films with Arbitrary Sizes. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7588–7592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, X.; Feng, Y.; Tang, S.; Feng, W. Preparation of a graphene oxide–phthalocyanine hybrid through strong π–π interactions. Carbon 2010, 48, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cheng, Q.; Jiang, L.; Tang, Z. Bioinspired Layered Materials with Superior Mechanical Performance. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1256–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, T.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shi, S.Q.; Gong, S.; Li, J. An ultrastrong bioinspired soy protein isolate-based nanocomposite with graphene oxide intercalation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 236, 109805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. An, Z.; Compton, O.C.; Putz, K.W.; Brinson, L.C.; Nguyen, S.T. Bio-Inspired Borate Cross-Linking in Ultra-Stiff Graphene Oxide Thin Films. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3842–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hao, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Hu, Z.; Yang, W. Tough and strong nacre-like composites from hyperbranched poly(amido amine) and clay nanosheets cross-linked by genipin. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Carosio, F.; Cuttica, F.; Medina, L.; Berglund, L.A. Clay nanopaper as multifunctional brick and mortar fire protection coating—Wood case study. Mater. Des. 2016, 93, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sun, X.; Ye, Q.; Shi, S.Q.; Gong, S.; Gao, Q.; Li, J.; Fang, Z. A nacre-inspired strong and flame retardant laminated veneer lumber bonded with magnesium oxychloride cement. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 18, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Carosio, F.; Alongi, J. Flame Retardant Multilayered Coatings on Acrylic Fabrics Prepared by One-Step Deposition of Chitosan/Montmorillonite Complexes. Fibers 2018, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhong, F.; Thomann, R.; Thomann, Y.; Burk, L.; Muelhaupt, R. Melt-Processable Nacre-Mimetic Hydrocarbon Composites via Polymer 1D Nanostructure Formation. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 9272–9279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ming, P.; Song, Z.; Gong, S.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, J.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, L.; Cheng, Q. Nacre-inspired integrated nanocomposites with fire retardant properties by graphene oxide and montmorillonite. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 21194–21200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ma, T.; Li, L.; Pan, M.; Guo, C.; Mei, C. In-situ synthesis of phosphorus-doped graphene paper with adenosine triphosphate and its application for intelligent fire warning. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2022, 162, 107142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yuan, B.; Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Yang, F.; Zhang, H.; Cao, C.; Zuo, B. Nacre-like graphene oxide paper bonded with boric acid for fire early-warning sensor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sun, Y.; Ding, R.; Hong, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Seo, Y.-K.; Nam, J.-D.; Suhr, J. MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films with layered microstructure for electromagnetic interference shielding and Joule heating. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, F.; Mao, J. Nacre-like graphene oxide/waterborne styrene butadiene rubber composite and its reusable anti-corrosion behavior on Al-2024. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 132, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhu, W.; Li, J.; Lei, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, T.; Duan, T.; Yao, W.; Zhou, J.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y. Silver nanoparticles incorporated konjac glucomannan-montmorillonite nacre-like composite films for antibacterial applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 197, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liang, B.; Shu, Y.; Wan, P.; Zhao, H.; Dong, S.; Hao, W.; Yin, P. Genipin-enhanced nacre-inspired montmorillonite-chitosan film with superior mechanical and UV-blocking properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 182, 107747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dai, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Tian, S.; Tian, X.; Xie, A.; Zhang, R.; Yan, Y.; Pan, J. Robust Nacrelike Graphene Oxide–Calcium Carbonate Hybrid Mesh with Underwater Superoleophobic Property for Highly Efficient Oil/Water Separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 4482–4493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chen, W.; Zhang, P.; Yu, S.; Zang, R.; Xu, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, B.; Meng, J. Nacre-inspired underwater superoleophobic films with high transparency and mechanical robustness. Nat. Protoc. 2022, 17, 2647–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Du, G.; Mao, A.; Yu, J.; Hou, J.; Zhao, N.; Han, J.; Zhao, Q.; Gao, W.; Xie, T.; Bai, H. Nacre-mimetic composite with intrinsic self-healing and shape-programming capability. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 16 04094 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Image of the inner, iridescent part of the shell of Haliotis laevigata [3]; (b) schematic of BMOI [4].
Figure 1. (a) Image of the inner, iridescent part of the shell of Haliotis laevigata [3]; (b) schematic of BMOI [4].
Materials 16 04094 g001
Materials 16 04094 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of (a) structure, (b) exfoliation, (c) inclusion and (d) application of montmorillonite [50].
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of (a) structure, (b) exfoliation, (c) inclusion and (d) application of montmorillonite [50].
Materials 16 04094 g002
Materials 16 04094 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Diagram of the PDMS-MMT-L manufacturing method; (b) schematic illustration (from left to right is SEM image, CFM image at the XY plane, as well as the three-dimensional reconstruction) [35].
Figure 3. (a) Diagram of the PDMS-MMT-L manufacturing method; (b) schematic illustration (from left to right is SEM image, CFM image at the XY plane, as well as the three-dimensional reconstruction) [35].
Materials 16 04094 g003
Materials 16 04094 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) The schematic of DAC/MTM; (b) the SEM image of DAC/MTM; (c) water stability test diagram of the DAC/MTM; (d) diagram of DAC/MTM exposed to gas combustion process and SEM after combustion, (1) DAC/MTM before combustion, (2) gas combustion process (3) DAC/MTM after combustion, (4, 5) SEM after combustion of the DAC/MTM in (3) [36].
Figure 4. (a) The schematic of DAC/MTM; (b) the SEM image of DAC/MTM; (c) water stability test diagram of the DAC/MTM; (d) diagram of DAC/MTM exposed to gas combustion process and SEM after combustion, (1) DAC/MTM before combustion, (2) gas combustion process (3) DAC/MTM after combustion, (4, 5) SEM after combustion of the DAC/MTM in (3) [36].
Materials 16 04094 g004
Materials 16 04094 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of PA/GO preparation and comparison of tensile test results between PA/GO and GO [38].
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of PA/GO preparation and comparison of tensile test results between PA/GO and GO [38].
Materials 16 04094 g005
Materials 16 04094 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Composite plot of LOG-P; (b) graph of the resulting Young’s modulus of LOG-P; (c) cyclic resistance measurements of Ag electrodes in hydrated and dehydrated states [39].
Figure 6. (a) Composite plot of LOG-P; (b) graph of the resulting Young’s modulus of LOG-P; (c) cyclic resistance measurements of Ag electrodes in hydrated and dehydrated states [39].
Materials 16 04094 g006
Materials 16 04094 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram for the corrosion/wear resistance mechanism of RGO/BTSE coating; (b) SEM image of RGO/BTSE coating after wear; (c) COF value of samples (bare Mg, RGO, RGO/BTSE) under the calculated wear rate; (d) results of electrochemical measurement; (e) sross-sectional SEM images of coated RGO/BTSE samples [40].
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram for the corrosion/wear resistance mechanism of RGO/BTSE coating; (b) SEM image of RGO/BTSE coating after wear; (c) COF value of samples (bare Mg, RGO, RGO/BTSE) under the calculated wear rate; (d) results of electrochemical measurement; (e) sross-sectional SEM images of coated RGO/BTSE samples [40].
Materials 16 04094 g007
Materials 16 04094 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Flow chart of the preparation of Ti3C2Tx-AgNW-PDA/Ni2+; (b) schematic representation of the structure of “brick” and “mortar”; (c) schematic representation of “brick and structure” [41]; (d) flow chart of the preparation of chitosan/MXene [42].
Figure 8. (a) Flow chart of the preparation of Ti3C2Tx-AgNW-PDA/Ni2+; (b) schematic representation of the structure of “brick” and “mortar”; (c) schematic representation of “brick and structure” [41]; (d) flow chart of the preparation of chitosan/MXene [42].
Materials 16 04094 g008
Materials 16 04094 g009 550
Figure 9. Scheme for the preparation of the PDG–PVA [45].
Figure 9. Scheme for the preparation of the PDG–PVA [45].
Materials 16 04094 g009
Materials 16 04094 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Preparation of CN- TiO2-mica; (b) infrared reflectance performance test of CN-TiO2-mica; (c,d) fire test of balsa wood and balsa wood with CN-TiO2-mica coating; (e) schematic diagram of the principle of high fire-retardant performance of the nacre-inspired coating [46].
Figure 10. (a) Preparation of CN- TiO2-mica; (b) infrared reflectance performance test of CN-TiO2-mica; (c,d) fire test of balsa wood and balsa wood with CN-TiO2-mica coating; (e) schematic diagram of the principle of high fire-retardant performance of the nacre-inspired coating [46].
Materials 16 04094 g010
Materials 16 04094 g011 550
Figure 11. Preparation process of Al2O3/GO-PVA [55,56].
Figure 11. Preparation process of Al2O3/GO-PVA [55,56].
Materials 16 04094 g011
Materials 16 04094 g012 550
Figure 12. The preparation process of Al2O3/GO-PVA. (a) GO and PVA. (b) mixing of GO and PVA. (c) GO-PVA coating and its SEM image. (d) assembling silane-modified Al2O3 microplatelets into monolayer at air−water interface. (e) transferring the assembled Al2O3 monolayer onto GO−PVA layer. (f) the obtained flexible, foldable artificial nacre after sequential repetition [57].
Figure 12. The preparation process of Al2O3/GO-PVA. (a) GO and PVA. (b) mixing of GO and PVA. (c) GO-PVA coating and its SEM image. (d) assembling silane-modified Al2O3 microplatelets into monolayer at air−water interface. (e) transferring the assembled Al2O3 monolayer onto GO−PVA layer. (f) the obtained flexible, foldable artificial nacre after sequential repetition [57].
Materials 16 04094 g012
Materials 16 04094 g013 550
Figure 13. Diagram of the synthesis process of GO-MoS2-TPU [59].
Figure 13. Diagram of the synthesis process of GO-MoS2-TPU [59].
Materials 16 04094 g013
Materials 16 04094 g014 550
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of principle, structure application of FC [31].
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of principle, structure application of FC [31].
Materials 16 04094 g014
Materials 16 04094 g015 550
Figure 15. Preparation and interfacial force diagram of (LDH/HEP)n [74].
Figure 15. Preparation and interfacial force diagram of (LDH/HEP)n [74].
Materials 16 04094 g015
Materials 16 04094 g016 550
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of preparation of GO-NPc [77].
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of preparation of GO-NPc [77].
Materials 16 04094 g016
Materials 16 04094 g017 550
Figure 17. (a) Storage modulus of SPI-Gly rGO film; (b) stress–strain of SPI-Gly rGO film [80].
Figure 17. (a) Storage modulus of SPI-Gly rGO film; (b) stress–strain of SPI-Gly rGO film [80].
Materials 16 04094 g017
Materials 16 04094 g018 550
Figure 18. (a) SEM images of HPAMAM/nanoclay composite (5000×); (b) FT-IR of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay composite film; (c) loss modulus of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay composites; (d) SAXD patterns of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay composites [81].
Figure 18. (a) SEM images of HPAMAM/nanoclay composite (5000×); (b) FT-IR of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay composite film; (c) loss modulus of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay composites; (d) SAXD patterns of G-HPAMAM/nanoclay composites [81].
Materials 16 04094 g018
Materials 16 04094 g019 550
Figure 19. Plot of the results of the cone calorimetric test of the LVL. (a) HRR, (b) THR, (c) SPR and (d) TSP in cone calorimetry test [83].
Figure 19. Plot of the results of the cone calorimetric test of the LVL. (a) HRR, (b) THR, (c) SPR and (d) TSP in cone calorimetry test [83].
Materials 16 04094 g019
Materials 16 04094 g020 550
Figure 20. Plot of the results of the cone calorimetric test of the composite material (a) TTI, (b)pkHRR, (c)THR and (d)TSR in cone calorimetry test [84].
Figure 20. Plot of the results of the cone calorimetric test of the composite material (a) TTI, (b)pkHRR, (c)THR and (d)TSR in cone calorimetry test [84].
Materials 16 04094 g020
Materials 16 04094 g021 550
Figure 21. Fire test: (a) the combustion result of a cotton ball; (b) combustion results of cotton ball protected by BP−OH40/NFC [47].
Figure 21. Fire test: (a) the combustion result of a cotton ball; (b) combustion results of cotton ball protected by BP−OH40/NFC [47].
Materials 16 04094 g021
Materials 16 04094 g022 550
Figure 22. Fire test: (a) Combustion result of a silk cocoon; (b) Combustion results of silk cocoon protected by rGO-MMT-PVA; (c,d) SEM image of different sizes of rGO-MMT-PVA after flame treatment [86].
Figure 22. Fire test: (a) Combustion result of a silk cocoon; (b) Combustion results of silk cocoon protected by rGO-MMT-PVA; (c,d) SEM image of different sizes of rGO-MMT-PVA after flame treatment [86].
Materials 16 04094 g022
Materials 16 04094 g023 550
Figure 23. (a) Preparation of the GO-ATP papers; (b) mechanism of early fire warning [87].
Figure 23. (a) Preparation of the GO-ATP papers; (b) mechanism of early fire warning [87].
Materials 16 04094 g023
Materials 16 04094 g024 550
Figure 24. Fire-alarm schematic [88].
Figure 24. Fire-alarm schematic [88].
Materials 16 04094 g024
Materials 16 04094 g025 550
Figure 25. (a) Synthetic path graph of Ti3C2Tx MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films; (b–f) SEM images of MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films with different volume ratios of MXene and xanthan (MXF1-MXF5); (g) neat xanthan film; (h) thickness and electrical conductivity of MXF1-MXF5 [89].
Figure 25. (a) Synthetic path graph of Ti3C2Tx MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films; (b–f) SEM images of MXene-xanthan nanocomposite films with different volume ratios of MXene and xanthan (MXF1-MXF5); (g) neat xanthan film; (h) thickness and electrical conductivity of MXF1-MXF5 [89].
Materials 16 04094 g025
Materials 16 04094 g026 550
Figure 26. Tafel plots of (a) wSBRand B-GO/wSBRc with (b) 0.5 wt%, (c) 1 wt% and (d) 2 wt% GO pasted Al-2024 at 1st, 2nd and 3rd stages; (e) corrosion current density (icorr) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) [90].
Figure 26. Tafel plots of (a) wSBRand B-GO/wSBRc with (b) 0.5 wt%, (c) 1 wt% and (d) 2 wt% GO pasted Al-2024 at 1st, 2nd and 3rd stages; (e) corrosion current density (icorr) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) [90].
Materials 16 04094 g026
Materials 16 04094 g027 550
Figure 27. (a) Before and (c) after pictures of water absorption of the conventional KGM-MTT blend films; (b) Before and (d) after pictures of water absorption of the KGM-MTT; (e) UV/visible light transmittance test results; (f) micrographs of cocultured cells of control group, (g) KGM films, (h) KGM-MTT composite films; (i) proliferation of cells after co-culture; (j) antibacterial action against staphylococci; (k) antibacterial action against Escherichia coli, (1) 0.1 mol/L of silver ion concentration, (2) 0.2 mol/L of silver ion concentration [91].
Figure 27. (a) Before and (c) after pictures of water absorption of the conventional KGM-MTT blend films; (b) Before and (d) after pictures of water absorption of the KGM-MTT; (e) UV/visible light transmittance test results; (f) micrographs of cocultured cells of control group, (g) KGM films, (h) KGM-MTT composite films; (i) proliferation of cells after co-culture; (j) antibacterial action against staphylococci; (k) antibacterial action against Escherichia coli, (1) 0.1 mol/L of silver ion concentration, (2) 0.2 mol/L of silver ion concentration [91].
Materials 16 04094 g027
Materials 16 04094 g028 550
Figure 28. (a) UV-vis spectra of CS, CS-GP-OH, MMT-CS, MMT-CS-GP, and MMT-CS-GP-OH films; (b) UV-vis spectra of MMT-CS-GP-OH films with different MMT contents; (c) schematic illustration of UV-shielding performance testing of the MMT-CS-PG-OH film; (d) photocatalytic degradation profile of rhodamine B unprotected and protected by the MMT-CS-PG-OH film [92].
Figure 28. (a) UV-vis spectra of CS, CS-GP-OH, MMT-CS, MMT-CS-GP, and MMT-CS-GP-OH films; (b) UV-vis spectra of MMT-CS-GP-OH films with different MMT contents; (c) schematic illustration of UV-shielding performance testing of the MMT-CS-PG-OH film; (d) photocatalytic degradation profile of rhodamine B unprotected and protected by the MMT-CS-PG-OH film [92].
Materials 16 04094 g028
Materials 16 04094 g029 550
Figure 29. (a) Image of GO-CaCO3 oil–water separation; (b) separation flux and efficiency of the GO-CaCO3; (c) reusability of the GO-CaCO3 [93].
Figure 29. (a) Image of GO-CaCO3 oil–water separation; (b) separation flux and efficiency of the GO-CaCO3; (c) reusability of the GO-CaCO3 [93].
Materials 16 04094 g029
Materials 16 04094 g030 550
Figure 30. Shape re-configuration of CS-CaCO3 [95].
Figure 30. Shape re-configuration of CS-CaCO3 [95].
Materials 16 04094 g030
Table
Table 1. List of raw materials.
Table 1. List of raw materials.
FunctionRaw MaterialReference
Inorganic raw materialBrickMontmorillonite[35,36,37]
Graphene oxide[38,39,40]
MXene[41,42,43]
Organic raw materialMortarPolyvinyl alcohol[44,45]
Cellulose and its derivatives[46,47,48]
Table
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of strategies.
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of strategies.
StrategiesAdvantageDisadvantageReference
Layer-by-layer assemblyHigh-precision, regular nanocompositesTime consuming and labor intensive[57]
Vacuum filtrationEnergy efficientLow density and high porosity[59]
Freeze castingFine control at large sizeImprecise control in small size[31,61,62,63,64]
OthersCo-extrusionLarge-scale processingImprecise control[65,66,67]
3D printingGenerate 3D complex structuresSmall-scale production[68,69]
Table
Table 3. Properties and application.
Table 3. Properties and application.
PropertiesApplicationReferences
Light weight and high strength materialStructural material of construction, aviation, and biomedical [81]
Flame-retardant materialsFireproof materials of construction, electronics[47,82,83,84,85,86]
Responsive materials Inductor of smart fields[87,88]
Electromagnetic shielding materialsIsolation layer electronic components[89]
Anti-corrosion materialsProtective film of objects that come into contact with corrosive liquids[90]
Other applicationsOil/water separation net/membrane[91,92,93,94,95]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, F.; Yang, H.; Feng, X. Research Progress in Preparation, Properties and Applications of Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Composites with “Brick-and-Mortar” Structure. Materials 2023, 16, 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114094

AMA Style

Liu F, Yang H, Feng X. Research Progress in Preparation, Properties and Applications of Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Composites with “Brick-and-Mortar” Structure. Materials. 2023; 16(11):4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Feng, Hongyu Yang, and Xiaming Feng. 2023. "Research Progress in Preparation, Properties and Applications of Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Composites with “Brick-and-Mortar” Structure" Materials 16, no. 11: 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114094

APA Style

Liu, F., Yang, H., & Feng, X. (2023). Research Progress in Preparation, Properties and Applications of Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Composites with “Brick-and-Mortar” Structure. Materials, 16(11), 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop