Low-Waste Technology for High-Precision Connecting Rod Forging Manufacturing
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Analyses of the presently realized technology of precision forging in a triple system.
- Development and design of a process of precision forging in a triple system with a pre-roughing pass 0X, together with advanced and detailed numerical simulations.
- Tests under industrial conditions in order to verify the conducted changes and forging quality tests.
- Measurements of the displacement of the upper and lower forging tools with and without guiding locks with respect to each other during the die forging process and their effect on the product quality.
- -
- A complex analysis of the forging process, including the use of a thermovision camera Flir 840 (FLIR Thermal Studio Starter, Teledyne FLIR LLC, 27700 SW Parkway Avenue, Wilsonville, OR 97070, USA);
- -
- Based on the current production technology and the necessary documentation, 3D solids, models and drawings based on the current technical documentation with the use of the CAD SolidWorks 2024 (Dassault Systèmes Sp.z.o.o, Krakov, Poland) and CAM Mastercam 2024 software (Zalco Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland) were included;
- -
- A numerical model was developed on the basis of the above data and the subsequent simulations were conducted with the use of the computation package FORGE 3.0 NxT in order to determine the key parameters and physical quantities and identify the most important problems;
- -
- Geometry measurements of the forgings and a hardness analysis of the obtained forgings were carried out with the use of fine control and measurement equipment, including calipers, a micrometer, a Werth measuring projector, a Mahr XC20 contour gauge (MarSurf XC 20 software, Mahr Poland Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland) and a Mitutoyo Strato 776 automatic measuring machine (MCOSMOS 5 software, Mitutoyo Poland Sp. o.o., Wroclaw, Poland). The hardness measurements were performed with the use of an EMCOTEST hardness tester (EMCO-TEST Prüfmaschinen GmbH, Kuchl, Austria).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Analysis of the Currently Realized Technology of Precision Forging in a Triple System
3.2. Development of Forging Tools with a Pre-Roughing Pass
3.3. Numerical Modelling of Hot Die Forging with a Pre-Roughing Pass
4. Tests Under Industrial Conditions, Verification of Numerical Modelling and Quality Tests of the Forgings
5. Measurements of the Displacements of the Upper and Lower Forging Tools With and Without Guiding Locks During the Die Forging Process and Their Effect on the Shift of the Forgings
6. Comparison of the Newly-Developed Technology with the Standard Technology
7. Summary and Final Conclusions
- -
- The introduced technological improvements allowed for a reduction in the preform diameter from 16 mm to 14 mm, which consequently led to a decrease in mass, thus saving material and costs.
- -
- The numerical simulations conducted for the variants of forging tools with and without guiding locks show no differences in the obtained results (e.g., force values, pressures and temperatures) because they simulate ideal conditions. In industrial processes, however, their positive effect on the process stability and forging displacement can be observed. The use of guiding locks in forging tools positively affects the realization of the technological process.
- -
- The microstructural studies confirmed that the pre-roughing pass does not negatively affect the properties of the forging and confirmed that its structure is consistent with that of a forging without the pre-roughing pass. The expected and typical ferritic–pearlitic microstructure for forgings, in agreement with the technical specification, was obtained.
- -
- The results obtained during the verification under industrial conditions for selected mechanical properties (hardness) and the dimensions of the geometric features are in agreement and correlate with the previous technology.
- -
- The measurements of the displacement of the forging tools with respect to each other, together with the measurements, confirmed that, at the height of the locks (i.e., 5 mm), the displacement in the X-axis is stable and does not exceed 0.05 mm, despite the clearance in the locks resulting from the developed geometry, which is 0.06 mm. The use of guiding locks positively affects the displacement value and the quality of the produced forgings.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhu, J.C.; Zhu, H.H.; Fan, S.D.; Xue, L.J.; Li, Y.F. A study on the influence of oil film lubrication to the strength of engine connecting rod components. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2016, 63, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirgaokar, M. Chapter 9: Methods of Analysis for Forging Operations. Cold and Hot Forging: Fundamentals and Applications; ASM International: Almere, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyedzavvar, M.; Seyedzavvar, M. Design of high duty diesel engine connecting rod based on finite element analysis. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2018, 40, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 10360-4:2000; Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 4: CMMs used in Scanning Measuring Mode. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2000.
- Li, S.Y.; Cheng, S.Y. Design Optimization for Cold Forging by an Integrated Methodology of CAD/FEM/ANN. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 97–101, 3281–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuertes, J.P.; Luis, C.J.; Luri, C.; Salcedo, D.J.; León, P.I. Design, simulation and manufacturing of a connecting rod from ultra-fine grained material and isothermal forging. J. Manuf. Process. 2016, 21, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, D.; Li, Y.; Deng, X.; Lei, J.; Deng, W. Design research on forging mark of connecting rod. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 113, 104537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuldeep, B.; Ravikumar, K.P.; Guruprasad, B.S.; Tasneem, H.A.; Ashrith, H.S.; Shree, N.; Muhammad, M.A.; Bashir, M.N.; Ahamad, T. A novel composite connecting rod: Study on mechanical and dynamic behaviour through experimental and finite element approach. Composites Part C 2023, 12, 100413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; He, F. A review of developments in the forging of connecting rods in China. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 151, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altan, T. Cold and Hot Forging Fundamentals and Application; ASM Internation: Novelty, OH, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Hawryluk, M.; Ziemba, J.; Zwierzchowski, M.; Janik, M. Analysis of a forging die wear by 3D reverse scanning combined with SEM and hardness tests. Wear 2021, 476, 203749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Mayank, S.; Vishal, G.; Jaskaran, S. A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting the Process Parameters and Various Measurement Techniques in Forging Processes. Steel Res. Int. 2023, 94, 2200529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakic, S.; Bugaric, U.; Radisavljevic, I.; Bulatovic, Z. Failure analysis of a special vehicle engine connecting rod. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2017, 79, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takemasu, T.; Vazquez, V.; Painter, B.; Altan, T. Investigation of metal flow and preform optimization in flashless forging of a connecting rod. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1996, 59, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegert, K.; Ringhand, D. Flashless and precision forging of connecting rods from P/M aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1994, 46, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whittaker, D. The competition for automotive connecting rod markets. Met. Powder Rep. 2001, 56, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Wang, K.K.; Song, S.L.; Lu, L.; Li, C.W. Investigation on forging process of S20S connecting rod and its defects analysis. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 538, 1646–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.C.; Zhao, G. Powder forging of a motorcycle connecting rod. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2002, 18, 544–548. [Google Scholar]
- Maarefdoust, R.; Maarefdoust, M. Analysis of Finite Volume of Forging Process of Connecting Rod. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 341–342, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Yu, Y. Closed-die Forging Technology and Numerical Simulation of Aluminum Alloy Connecting Rod. Open Physic 2019, 17, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaleed HM, T.; Samad, Z.; Othman, A.R.; Abdul Mujeebu, M.; Badarudin, A.; Abdullah, A.B. Computer-Aided FE Simulation for Flashless Cold Forging of Connecting Rod Without Underfilling. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2011, 36, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, H.C.; Zhang, R.; Kang, N.Z.; Huang, J.H. Simulation Analysis of Wheel Bearing Forging Process Based on DeForm. Metalurgija 2025, 64, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
- Jantepa, N.; Siripath, N.; Suranuntchai, S. Billet Size Optimization for Hot Forging of AISI 1045 Medium Carbon Steel Using Zener-Hollomon and Cingara-McQueen Model. Int. J. Eng. Technol. Innov. 2024, 14, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myshechkin, A.A.; Kravchenko, I.N.; Zuev, V.V.; Preobrazhenskaya, E.V.; Skripnik, S.V.; Bykova, A.D. Technological simulation of the process of hot forging of two-layer forgings with deep cavities and an inverted cone. Metallurgist 2024, 68, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, X.; Chen, L.; Pater, Z.; Li, Z.; Jie, X.; Xia, Y. Analysis and prospects of efficient and precise forming technology for aeroengine turbine shafts. Adv. Sci. Technol. -Res. J. 2025, 19, 132–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javid, Y. Optimizing hot forging parameters for gas turbine blade formation: A comprehensive study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 133, 1563–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulzak, T. Multi Wedge Cross Rolling of Axle Forgings. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2023, 68, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, F.; Liang, J.; Xu, P.; Xu, G. Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Property, and Strengthening in a Lightweight Mg-Y-Zn-Mn Alloy Fabricated by Multidirectional Forging and Hot Rolling. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Ying, Y.; Zhou, M.; Cao, Z.; Guo, D.; Yang, H. Effect of microstructure and texture gradient on the backscattered ultrasound amplitude of Ti-6Al-4V bars for aeroengine blade. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1010, 177604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, W.; Dou, Z.H.; Zhang, T.A.; Han, J.R. Microstructure and property evolution of CuCr50 alloy prepared by aluminum thermal reduction-electromagnetic casting during hot forging process. Mater. Charact. 2024, 217, 114400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiopu, A.G.; Girish, B.M.; Satish, B.M.; Shubha, S. Wear and Hardness Characterization of Hot Forged Tungsten Carbide reinforced Aluminium 6061 Composite Materials. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2024, 14, 12688–12693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawryluk, M.; Gronostajski, Z.; Jabłoński, P.; Janik, M.; Suliga, M. An integrated vision control system for the evaluation of the shape-dimensional accuracy and quality of valve forgings used in motor truck engines. Measurement 2023, 210, 112541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.H.; Yang, Y.X. Three-dimensional shape measurement technique for hot and shiny forging. Precis. Eng. -J. Int. Soc. Precis. Eng. Nanotechnol. 2024, 88, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, D. Numerical optimization on hot forging process of connecting rods based on RSA with experimental verification. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90, 3129–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez, E.I.; Ruiz, O.; Reyes-Ruiz, C.; Ortiz, A. Preform geometry determination for a connecting rod forging by CEL model in Abaqus. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 127, 5569–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, D.; Mondal, S. A Review on Modelling, Design and Optimization of Forging Process 2021. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2001, 1126, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajendran, N.; Yurgel, C.C.; Misiolek, W.Z.; Alves de Sousa, R. Hot Forging Die Design Optimization Using FEM Analysis for Near-Net Forming of 18CrNiMo7-6 Steel Pinion Shaft. Metals 2023, 13, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawryluk, M.; Jakubik, J. Analysis of forging defects for selected industrial die forging processes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2016, 59, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alloy Steels, Technical Sheets. Available online: https://www.lucefin.com/oaleekso/files_mf/161650921042CrMo4NeENG.pdf?_gl=1*i5b1pw*_ga*ODExMTE5MzM3LjE3MzU4NDM2MzI.*_ga_JB6T21FCKE*MTczNTg0MzYzMS4xLjEuMTczNTg0MzY1Ni4zNS4wLjA (accessed on 2 October 2024).
- Bilbao, O.; Loizaga, I.; Alonso, J.; Girot, F.; Torregaray, A. 42CrMo4 steel flow behavior characterization for high temperature closed dies hot forging in automotive components applications. Heliyon 2023, 9, E22256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EN ISO 6507-1:2023; Metallic materials—Vickers Hardness Test—Part 1: Test Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
Number of Hammer Strokes/Tool Impression | Energy from Numerical Simulations | Hammer Stroke Energy Under Industrial Conditions |
---|---|---|
0X | 2.8 kJ | 2.6 kJ |
1X | 4.8 kJ | 4.5 kJ |
2X | 4.6 kJ | 4.4 kJ |
Sample No. | Diameter Ø22 ± 0.1 (mm) | Diameter Ø19 ± 0.3 (mm) | Thickness 10.8 + 0.6 (mm) | Thickness 3.3 ± 0.2 (mm) | Distance from the Axis 53 ± 0.1 (mm) | Visual Inspection | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 21.98 | 19.03 | 11.09 | 3.29 | 53.038 | OK |
2 | 21.94 | 19.02 | 11.11 | 3.31 | 53.008 | OK | |
3 | 21.95 | 19.00 | 11.09 | 3.28 | 52.969 | OK | |
2 | 4 | 21.92 | 18.98 | 11.08 | 3.27 | 52.990 | OK |
5 | 22.02 | 19.09 | 11.09 | 3.29 | 53.019 | OK | |
6 | 21.95 | 18.99 | 11.09 | 3.28 | 52.992 | OK | |
3 | 7 | 21.95 | 18.99 | 11.10 | 3.29 | 52.970 | OK |
8 | 21.97 | 19.02 | 11.09 | 3.29 | 53.000 | OK | |
9 | 21.94 | 18.98 | 11.11 | 3.30 | 52.975 | OK | |
4 | 10 | 21.96 | 19.00 | 11.11 | 3.30 | 52.965 | OK |
11 | 21.93 | 18.97 | 11.08 | 3.26 | 52.950 | OK | |
12 | 21.94 | 18.97 | 11.08 | 3.28 | 52.954 | OK |
Sample No. | Small Eye Left Side R1 ± 0.5 (A) (mm) | Small Eye Right Side R1 ± 0.5 (B) (mm) | Big Eye Left Side R1 ± 0.5 (C) (mm) | Big Eye Right Side R1 ± 0.5 (D) (mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.91 |
2 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 0.98 | 0.95 | |
3 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.04 | |
2 | 4 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 1.11 |
5 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.98 | |
6 | 1.19 | 1.15 | 1.01 | 1.04 | |
3 | 7 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
8 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.95 | |
9 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.16 | 1.14 | |
4 | 10 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 1.01 |
11 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | |
12 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.04 | 1.07 |
Sample No. | Average Durability of a Forging Using the Previous Technology (2 Impressions: 3 Strokes) | Average Durability of a Forging Using the New Technology (3 Impressions: 3 Strokes) |
---|---|---|
1 | 218 HBW | 225 HBW |
2 | 195 HBW | 205 HBW |
3 | 208 HBW | 230 HBW |
4 | 199 HBW | 203 HBW |
5 | 221 HBW | 217 HBW |
6 | 205 HBW | 219 HBW |
7 | 201 HBW | 212 HBW |
Average | 207 HBW | 216 HBW |
Sample No. | Lateral Displacement in the X-Axis (mm) | |
---|---|---|
Forging Tools with Guiding Locks | Forging Tools Without Guiding Locks | |
1 | 0.07 | 0.13 |
2 | 0.06 | 0.15 |
3 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
4 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
5 | 0.08 | 0.14 |
AVG | 0.08 | 0.128 |
Parameter | Standard Technology | Newly-Developed Technology | Improvement Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Charge material diameter | 16 mm | 14 mm | −12.5% |
Input weight | 386 g | 296 g | −23% |
Material cost for producing one leaf (assuming a material price of 4 PLN/kg) | 1.54 PLN/per leaf | 1.18 PLN/per leaf | −23% |
Weight of flash | 237 g | 147 g | −38% |
Electric energy consumption * | 40 kWh/h | 36 kWh/h | −10% |
Cycle time | 10 s | 10 s | 0 |
Number of hammer strikes to produce one leaf | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Strike forces 1 | 8 kJ | 2.6 kJ | −67.5% |
Strike forces 2 | 7.1 kJ | 4.5 kJ | −37% |
Strike forces 3 | 5.3 kJ | 4.4 kJ | −17% |
Durability of forging tools (without nitriding) | 3000 items | 3800 items | +27% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dudkiewicz, Ł.; Hawryluk, M. Low-Waste Technology for High-Precision Connecting Rod Forging Manufacturing. Materials 2025, 18, 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020443
Dudkiewicz Ł, Hawryluk M. Low-Waste Technology for High-Precision Connecting Rod Forging Manufacturing. Materials. 2025; 18(2):443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020443
Chicago/Turabian StyleDudkiewicz, Łukasz, and Marek Hawryluk. 2025. "Low-Waste Technology for High-Precision Connecting Rod Forging Manufacturing" Materials 18, no. 2: 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020443
APA StyleDudkiewicz, Ł., & Hawryluk, M. (2025). Low-Waste Technology for High-Precision Connecting Rod Forging Manufacturing. Materials, 18(2), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020443