Next Article in Journal
HCMV Antivirals and Strategies to Target the Latent Reservoir
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vivo Models to Study the Pathogenesis of Extra-Respiratory Complications of Influenza A Virus Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of a Mucosal Antibody (IgA) Test to Identify Persistent Infection with Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hemagglutinin Stability and Its Impact on Influenza A Virus Infectivity, Pathogenicity, and Transmissibility in Avians, Mice, Swine, Seals, Ferrets, and Humans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/v13050815
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models for Human Influenza A Virus

by
Cindy M. Spruit
1,
Nikoloz Nemanichvili
2,
Masatoshi Okamatsu
3,
Hiromu Takematsu
4,
Geert-Jan Boons
1,5 and
Robert P. de Vries
1,*
1
Department of Chemical Biology & Drug Discovery, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Division of Pathology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
3
Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Hokkaido, Japan
4
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan
5
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(5), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050815
Submission received: 25 March 2021 / Revised: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 28 April 2021 / Published: 1 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Models for Influenza Virus Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The first step in influenza virus infection is the binding of hemagglutinin to sialic acid-containing glycans present on the cell surface. Over 50 different sialic acid modifications are known, of which N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) are the two main species. Animal models with α2,6 linked Neu5Ac in the upper respiratory tract, similar to humans, are preferred to enable and mimic infection with unadapted human influenza A viruses. Animal models that are currently most often used to study human influenza are mice and ferrets. Additionally, guinea pigs, cotton rats, Syrian hamsters, tree shrews, domestic swine, and non-human primates (macaques and marmosets) are discussed. The presence of NeuGc and the distribution of sialic acid linkages in the most commonly used models is summarized and experimentally determined. We also evaluated the role of Neu5Gc in infection using Neu5Gc binding viruses and cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH)−/− knockout mice, which lack Neu5Gc and concluded that Neu5Gc is unlikely to be a decoy receptor. This article provides a base for choosing an appropriate animal model. Although mice are one of the most favored models, they are hardly naturally susceptible to infection with human influenza viruses, possibly because they express mainly α2,3 linked sialic acids with both Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc modifications. We suggest using ferrets, which resemble humans closely in the sialic acid content, both in the linkages and the lack of Neu5Gc, lung organization, susceptibility, and disease pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Infection of humans by influenza A viruses starts at the epithelium cells in the upper respiratory tract, where the hemagglutinin (HA) on the outside of a virus particle binds to glycans with a terminal sialic acid. The terminal sialic acids can be linked through an α2,3 or α2,6 bond to the penultimate galactose. In humans, mainly α2,6 linked sialic acids are present in the upper respiratory tract. The expression of α2,3 and α2,6 linked sialic acids varies between species and tissues [1].
Another variable in the influenza receptor is the type of sialic acid, of which N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) are the main species (Figure 1). The majority of influenza A viruses use a glycan with a terminal Neu5Ac as their receptor, although some strains use Neu5Gc instead [2,3]. Importantly, only Neu5Ac is present in humans [4,5,6]. Human influenza A viruses specifically bind α2,6 linked sialic acids.
Neu5Gc can be produced in animals that express an active form of the enzyme cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH), which facilitates the hydroxylation of Neu5Ac to turn it into Neu5Gc. However, the gene encoding CMAH, mainly expressed in mammalian species, has been lost partially or completely in several events during evolution [4]. Possibly, the negative selection of Neu5Gc was induced by lethal pathogens binding to Neu5Gc. Therefore, the loss of Neu5Gc protected individuals from infection with these pathogens [7]. The presence of an intact CMAH gene does not automatically lead to high expression of Neu5Gc in all tissues [8]. The expression of Neu5Gc in species used as animal models for human influenza has received little attention so far and no clear overview of this expression is available.
Proper animal models are essential for fundamental and applied research on human influenza viruses, vaccines, and antivirals. Often considered factors for choosing an animal model are the experimental costs, disease pathogenesis, and susceptibility. Currently, the sialic acid linkage and especially the Neu5Gc content are often overlooked. Human influenza viruses mainly bind α2,6 linked Neu5Ac, while many animal models express Neu5Gc. The lack of correct sialic acid receptors in animal models could skew the results of a study since adaptation of a virus may be required before a successful infection is possible. The animal models mostly used to study human influenza are ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) and mice (Mus musculus). While ferrets mainly express the human receptor (α2,6 linked Neu5Ac), mice also express Neu5Gc and the sialic acid linkages in the respiratory tract differ from humans [1,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Other animal models that are discussed in this article are cotton rats (Sigmodon species), Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), domestic swine (Sus scrofa domesticus), macaques (Macaca), and marmosets (Callitrichidae). Of these animals, domestic swine are naturally infected by human influenza viruses [1].
In this article, we summarize the current knowledge on Neu5Gc expression in animal models for human influenza and supplement this with protein histochemistry stains on lung tissues. The role of Neu5Gc in influenza virus infection is still unclear. Furthermore, studies on Neu5Gc specific influenza viruses or Neu5Ac specific viruses in animal models that are rich in Neu5Gc are scarce. Therefore, we also studied the infection of H5N1 viruses that bind either Neu5Ac or Neu5Gc in CMAH−/− knockout mice [20]. Interestingly, although the Neu5Gc specific H5N1 virus retained Neu5Ac binding, no significant difference in pathogenesis was observed between wild-type (WT) and CMAH−/− mice. The Neu5Gc binding H5N1 virus was less infectious compared to the WT virus but this was not affected by the presence of Neu5Gc in mice. This article provides a base for choosing suitable animal models to study human influenza.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Virus and Cells

WT and mutant HA-Y161A influenza viruses A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5N1) were propagated in 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs at 35 °C for 48 h. The collected allantoic fluid was stored at −80 °C. Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in minimum essential medium (MEM) (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 10% non-immobilized fetal calf serum (FCS; SAFC Biosciences, Lenexa, KS, USA), 0.3 mg/mL L-glutamine (Wako Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin (Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokyo, Japan), 100 U/mL penicillin G (Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokyo, Japan), and 8 µg/mL gentamicin (Takata Pharmaceutical, Saitama, Japan).

2.2. Expression and Purification of HA

The pCD5 expression vector was used to clone HA-encoding cDNAs in frame with DNA sequences coding for a secretion signal sequence, a Twin-Strep (WSHPQFEKGGGSGGGSWSHPQFEK); IBA, Munich, Germany), a GCN4 leucine zipper trimerization domain (RMKQIEDKIEEIESKQKKIENEIARIKK) [21], and a superfolder green fluorescent protein (GFP) [22] or mOrange2 [23]. H5 HA encoding cDNAs of A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (both WT and mutant Y161A) or A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (both WT and mutant Y161A) were cloned into the pCD5 expression vector as described previously [24,25]. The HAs were expressed in HEK293S GnTI(-) cells and purified from cell culture supernatants as described earlier [24]. In short, transfection was performed using the pCD5 expression vectors and polyethyleneimine I. At 6 h after transfection, the transfection mixtures were replaced by 293 SFM II expression medium (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with DMSO (1.5%), 1% glutaMAX (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), sodium bicarbonate (3.7 g/L), Primatone RL-UF (3.0 g/L), glucose (2.0 g/L), and valproic acid (0.4 g/L). The cell culture supernatants were collected at 5 to 6 days after transfection and HAs were purified using Strep-Tactin sepharose beads (IBA, Göttingen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Protein Histochemistry

Sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded horse (Equus ferus caballus), guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), domestic swine (Sus scrofa domesticus), ferret (Mustela putorius furo), and dog (Canis lupus familiaris) tissues were obtained from the Division of Pathology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) lung tissue was a kind gift from Barry Rockx of the department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the Netherlands. The lungs of five-week-old C57BL/6 (Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) and CMAH−/− knockout mice (Mus musculus) [20] were also fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Protein histochemistry was performed as previously described [26,27]. Shortly, 4 µm tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigens were retrieved by heating the slides for 10 min in 10 mM sodium citrate at pH 6.0. Subsequently, slides were treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide in MeOH for 30 min to inactivate endogenous peroxidases. The slides were blocked overnight at 4 °C with PBS supplemented with 3% BSA (w/v) (for protein stains) or carbo-free blocking solution (SP-5040-125; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) (for Sambuca nigra agglutinin (SNA) stains). The slides were then stained using 100 µL of 5 µg/mL HAs after pre-complexing the proteins on ice for 20 min with mouse anti-streptag-HRP and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (626520; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) in PBS in respectively a 4:2:1 molar ratio. For anti-Neu5Gc stains, 1:300 diluted Anti-Neu5Gc IgY (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and 1:100 diluted Rabbit anti-chicken IgY-HRP (31401; Thermo Fisher) were used. For SNA stains, 100 µL of 5 µg/mL biotinylated SNA (B1305; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) in PBS was used to stain the slides for 30 min. Afterward, the Vectastain ABC kit (PK-4000; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was applied according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After washing with PBS, slides were counterstained using hematoxylin and the HA binding was visualized using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany).

2.4. Hemagglutination Assay

Hemagglutination assays with pre-complexed HAs, at a starting concentration of 10 μg/mL, were performed with 0.5% canine (beagle, that lacks Neu5Gc [28]) and equine erythrocytes as described previously [24]. Shortly, precomplexation was performed with HAs, anti-streptag, and goat anti-mouse antibodies in a 4:2:1 molar ratio respectively.

2.5. Glycan Microarray Binding of HA

The previously presented glycan microarray [3] was used. HAs were pre-complexed with mouse anti-streptag-HRP (horseradish peroxidase) and goat anti-mouse-Alexa555 antibodies in a 4:2:1 molar ratio respectively in 50 µL PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 and incubated for 15 min on ice. The mixture was incubated on the glycan array slides for 90 min in a humidified chamber after which the slides were rinsed successively with PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween-20, PBS, and deionized water. The slides were dried by centrifugation and immediately scanned as described previously [3]. The data (six replicates) was processed by removing the highest and lowest replicate after which the mean value and standard deviation were calculated over the four remaining replicates.

2.6. Virus Challenge in Mice

Five-week-old C57BL/6 (Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) and CMAH−/− knockout mice [20] (n = 20 mice/each strain) were acclimatized for one week before virus challenge. Mice were inoculated intranasally with the WT or mutant HA-Y161A A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5N1) viruses (n = 10 mice/each strain) using 10 times the 50% mouse lethal dose (MLD50) in 30 µL per mouse under anesthesia into C57BL/6 and CMAH knockout mice. The MLD50 was determined in WT C57BL/6 mice with WT A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5N1) virus. The infectivity titer (10 MLD50 = 103.0 50% egg infective dose) of the inoculum was adjusted with PBS. For 14 days following inoculation, mice (n = 5/each strain) were observed daily for body weight, clinical signs, and survival. Viruses were fully sequenced and evaluated for changes in amino acid 161 of the hemagglutinin before inoculation and at 3 days post infection (dpi).

2.7. Preparation of Lung Homogenates

At 3 dpi, mouse lungs were collected after euthanasia (n = 5/each strain). Lungs were homogenized with 2 mL of MEM supplemented with 10,000 U/mL penicillin G, 10 mg/mL streptomycin, 0.3 mg/mL gentamicin, 250 U/mL Nystatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 0.5% bovine serum albumin fraction V (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The homogenized lung tissue was centrifuged for 5 min at 4 °C and 8000 rpm. The supernatant was collected and stored at −80 °C until quantification of virus titers.

2.8. Virus Titration of Lung Homogenates

Plaque assays were performed as described previously [29]. Briefly, the mouse lung homogenates were diluted in MEM without FCS, applied in tenfold dilutions onto confluent monolayers of MDCK cells, and incubated at 35 °C with 5% CO2. After 1 h, the unbound virus was removed by discarding the supernatant and washing the cells with PBS. The cells were then overlaid with MEM containing 5 µg/mL acetylated trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% Bacto Agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After incubation for 48 h at 35 °C, the cells were stained with 0.005% neutral red. After incubation for another 24 h at 35 °C, the number of plaques was counted. The number of plaque-forming units (PFU) was calculated as the product of the reciprocal value of the highest virus dilution and the number of plaques in the dilution.

3. Results

3.1. Animal Models for Human Influenza

The most used animal models for human influenza are mice [30,31,32,33,34], ferrets [30,31,32,34,35,36,37,38], and guinea pigs [31,34]. Other small animal models that are used are cotton rats [34,39,40,41] and Syrian hamsters [32,34], and recently, tree shrews have been suggested [42,43]. Commonly used larger animal models are domestic swine [44] and non-human primates (mainly macaques and marmosets) [34,41,45,46,47,48].
When comparing experimental costs, housing requirements, space usage, and handling conditions for small animal models, mice and cotton rats are less demanding than guinea pigs, ferrets, tree shrews, and Syrian hamsters [30,32,34,49,50,51,52]. Swine and non-human primates require more space and more complicated husbandry and handling conditions, associated with higher experimental costs compared to small animal models [34,49].
For the analysis of infection and immunological reactions, high availability of immunological reagents is beneficial, such as available for mice, cotton rats, swine, and non-human primates [30,34,53]. For ferrets, guinea pigs, and Syrian hamsters [34,51,54,55], only a few immunological reagents are available, which complicates the analysis of experiments.

3.2. Physical Characteristics of Animal Models

Comparable disease pathogenesis (sneezing, nasal discharge, lethargy, fever, weight loss, and viral shedding) in humans and animal models simplifies the analysis of the influenza virus infection. From all animal models, ferrets best represent the symptoms of human influenza virus infection, whereas mice, non-human primates, swine, cotton rats, and tree shrews moderately reflect the symptoms. On the other hand, guinea pigs and Syrian hamsters only reflect human symptoms to a lower extent [34,43,49,56].
The similarity in disease pathogenesis does not seem to be correlated to the resemblance between human and animal model lung structures. In the human lung, the major vessels in the lung and the bronchi are linked by extensive interlobular and intralobular connective tissue. Human lungs are most closely resembled by lungs of non-human primates in terms of structure, physiology, and mucosal immune mechanisms [57], but many (ethical) issues are associated with experiments with non-human primates. Swine and ferret lungs very closely resemble human lungs as well [36,53,56,58]. Furthermore, similarities in the lung organization are found in most mammals, among which guinea pigs, cotton rats, tree shrews, and Syrian hamsters [34,59,60,61]. However, mice lungs have different branching, organization of bronchi, and distribution of connective tissue [53,62].
To study the clearance and development of influenza virus infection, it is useful to have similar immune responses to influenza infection. The immune system of ferrets has not been studied in detail [31,54]. The immune systems of guinea pigs, Syrian hamsters, tree shrews, and swine, compared to murine species (mice and rats), are more similar to the human immune system [44,50,51,53,63,64,65]. Non-human primates have high genetic homology to humans and more than 90% amino acid similarity is found in the cytokines of humans and non-human primates [47,66,67], but differences in the sialic acid-recognizing immunoglobulin-like lectins are observed [68]. Interestingly, Neu5Gc regulates and influences several immunological pathways. Upon activation of T cells, upregulation of Neu5Ac and α2,3 linked sialic acids and downregulation of Neu5Gc and α2,6 linked sialic acids was observed [69,70]. Furthermore, T cells were more reactive to stimulation in the absence than in the presence of Neu5Gc [70,71]. Additionally, Neu5Gc suppresses the B cell responses and proliferation [20]. Therefore, the presence of Neu5Gc may be important in the comparison of the immune responses of different animal models. Apart from the influence of sialic acids on the immune system, humans can already have pre-existing immunity to a broad spectrum of influenza strains. This pre-existing immunity is often lacking in animal models, although pre-immune mice and ferret models are available [72,73,74,75,76].
The susceptibility of animal models to influenza viruses that are not adapted is an important factor for choosing an animal model, since an adapted virus may have different properties than the original virus. Swine are natural hosts of influenza viruses and are infected by the same subtypes of influenza as humans [1]. Furthermore, some non-human primates in nature are also infected with human influenza A viruses [46,77]. Additionally, ferrets, guinea pigs, cotton rats, Syrian hamsters, and tree shrews can be infected with human influenza viruses without adaptation [30,32,34,39,43,49,54,55]. When considering the two most often used small animal models for human influenza, ferrets are susceptible to influenza without adaptation, while the susceptibility of mice depends on both the influenza subtype and mice strains that are used. Efforts have been made to provide different strains of mice with a broad genetic background [78], of which some strains were shown to be more susceptible to H3N2 infection [79]. In general, DBA/2 mice seem to be more susceptible than C57BL/6 mice to human influenza infection [33,80,81,82,83,84]. Furthermore, genetic modification of mice in for example the IFITM3 [85], Mx1 [86], or Casp1 [87] genes can increase the susceptibility. Depending on the strain of influenza used in the research, it is important to choose an appropriate and susceptible murine strain that does not require adaptation of the virus.

3.3. Expression of N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models

The susceptibility of animal models is for the most part caused by the receptor specificity of the hemagglutinin and the sialic acids present at the site of infection. To mimic influenza virus infection in humans closely, similar sialic acids and sialic acid linkages in the respiratory tract of animal models are required. In humans, mainly α2,6 linked Neu5Ac is present in the upper respiratory tract, which is bound by human influenza A viruses [1]. Importantly, only Neu5Ac is present in humans, since the CMAH gene responsible for producing Neu5Gc (Figure 1) is not intact [4,5,6].
The linkage of sialic acids to the penultimate galactose residues in the respiratory tract of animal models has already been extensively reviewed by others and is summarized in Table 1. In short, tree shrews and ferrets have a human-like distribution of sialic acid linkages, with α2,6 linked sialic acids in the upper respiratory tract and α2,3 linked sialic acids in the lower respiratory tract. Swine mainly express α2,6 linked sialic acids and guinea pigs, rats, and Syrian hamsters express both α2,3 and α2,6 linked sialic acids. Non-human primates (macaque and marmoset) and mice mainly express α2,3 linked sialic acids. So far, no overview is available describing the presence of Neu5Gc in animal models for human influenza. Therefore, we summarized the presence of both intact CMAH genes and the expression of Neu5Gc (Table 1) in animal models for human influenza, since the presence of CMAH does not automatically lead to high expression of Neu5Gc [8]. For completeness, we added dogs and horses to the table, since these species highlight the differences in sialic acid expression between species, although they are hardly used as models for research on human influenza A viruses. Neu5Gc is present in all animal models except the ferret and marmoset. Information on the percentage of Neu5Gc in the respiratory tract with respect to the total sialic acid content was, to our knowledge, only available for swine and varied from 9–53%. In dogs, the presence of Neu5Gc depends on the breed and the consensus is that Neu5Gc is present in some Japanese breeds, while Neu5Gc lacks in all other breeds [88]. At the moment, it is unclear whether an intact CMAH gene is present in all dog breeds. For the other investigated species, the presence of an intact CMAH gene correlates with the expression of Neu5Gc.
The table is supplemented with protein histochemistry of the Neu5Gc content of the lungs of mice, ferrets, guinea pigs, Syrian hamsters (which was not investigated for Neu5Gc content before), and domestic swine (Figure 2). We used the WT and Y161A mutant HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) which have previously been used to specifically detect α2,3 linked Neu5Ac and α2,3 linked Neu5Gc, respectively [3]. To clarify the presence of α2,6 linked sialic acids, Sambuca nigra agglutinin (SNA) was used [3]. We found that Neu5Ac is expressed in all investigated lungs. In most lungs, α2,3 linked Neu5Ac was predominantly expressed in the bronchioles and alveoli, except for the ferret in which only alveolar staining was observed. Neu5Gc expression is detected throughout the tissues for all species except the ferret. Interestingly, Neu5Ac but not Neu5Gc is expressed in the bronchioles of the Syrian hamster and swine, while the inverse is true for endothelial cells in blood vessels. Thus, although Neu5Gc is present in species with an intact CMAH, expression is mainly seen in the alveoli, which are located deep in the lung. Moreover, Neu5Gc is present in the vascular system which is hardly infected by influenza A viruses. Mice hardly expressed α2,6 linked sialic acids, as expected. High expression of α2,6 linked sialic acids is observed in ferrets and swine, moderate expression in guinea pigs and Syrian hamsters. Taken together, the human respiratory tract is best resembled, in terms of sialic acids, by ferrets, which express mainly α2,6 linked Neu5Ac. On the other hand, mice mainly express α2,3 linked sialic acids, of which a part is Neu5Gc instead of Neu5Ac. We wondered if abrogating Neu5Gc from mice using CMAH−/− knockout mice would make mice more susceptible to influenza A virus infection as most of those viruses exclusively bind Neu5Ac.

3.4. Neu5Gc as a Functional Receptor

The effect of Neu5Gc on influenza virus infection is not clear yet. Although Neu5Gc was previously suggested to act as a decoy receptor for influenza viruses [96,112], many others suggest that Neu5Gc is not a decoy receptor and Neu5Gc may even be a functional receptor. Firstly, an influenza A strain that bound Neu5Ac showed no reduced infectivity for CMAH-transfected cells with a higher Neu5Gc content [112]. Secondly, a mutant H3N8 virus that preferred binding to Neu5Ac over Neu5Gc only moderately infected ponies, which have a high Neu5Gc content, while another mutant virus that preferred binding to Neu5Gc infected all ponies in the experiment [111]. Thirdly, equine H7 viruses specifically bind Neu5Gc [2,3] and some other influenza A viruses bind Neu5Gc as well [2,103,113]. Some of these Neu5Gc binding viruses infect swine, with a significant amount of Neu5Gc in their respiratory tract. There is however no indication that these viruses persisted in the domestic swine population.
To investigate the effect of Neu5Gc on influenza virus infection, the CMAH−/− knockout mice model [15,20,71] was used, which is not able to produce Neu5Gc and is, therefore, more similar to humans than WT mice. The CMAH−/− model is also thought to produce a stronger immune response to influenza virus infection than WT mice [71]. Previously, we showed with a glycan array and hemagglutination assays that H5N1 WT virus and HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5VN) solely bind Neu5Ac, while the Y161A mutant only binds Neu5Gc [3]. Here, we demonstrate that the WT HA of a closely related H5N1 virus, A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5HK), mainly binds to canine erythrocytes (Western breed), containing only Neu5Ac. The H5HK Y161A mutant mainly binds to equine erythrocytes (Figure 3A), containing primarily Neu5Gc, as indicated in Table 1. Like H5VN, the H5HK WT HA binds both equine and canine trachea, while the Y161A mutant only binds the equine trachea (Figure 3B). Therefore, the results of the hemagglutination assay and tissue staining indicated that both H5VN Y161A and H5HK Y161A are specifically binding Neu5Gc.
To further investigate the effect of Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc binding viruses, we produced a Y161A mutant of the H5HK virus. Infection of this virus was examined in WT (C57BL/6) and CMAH−/− knockout mice. Anti-Neu5Gc stains confirmed the absence of Neu5Gc in CMAH−/− mice and the presence in WT mice (Figure 3C), and the presence of Neu5Ac was shown in Figure 2. Upon infection, it became clear that the WT and CMAH−/− knockout mice were equally well infected, as shown by the survival curves (Figure 3D), bodyweight curves (Figure 3E), and the measurement of the PFU per gram in the lungs at three days post infection (Figure 3F). Thus, abrogating Neu5Gc did not facilitate increased virus infection and replication of a Neu5Ac binding virus and therefore it is also unlikely that Neu5Gc is used as a decoy receptor. Possibly, enough Neu5Ac was present in both the WT and CMAH−/− mice to support effective infection of the Neu5Ac binding virus. The H5HK Y161A virus, binding Neu5Gc, has significantly lower pathogenicity (WT mice in Figure 3F) compared to the WT virus (p = 0.0007). Interestingly, this virus still infected the CMAH−/− knockout mice, which was not expected based on the Neu5Gc specificity. Sequencing of the inoculated and isolated viruses (at 3 dpi) confirmed that before and after inoculation, amino acid 161 of the HA of the WT virus is a tyrosine (encoded by TAC) and this amino acid in the HA-Y161A virus is an alanine (encoded by GCC).
After this observation in vivo, we decided to do a final test on the binding properties of the WT and mutant H5HK HA on the glycan array. We found that the WT H5HK HA only binds Neu5Ac, as expected. However, the Y161A mutant binds both Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc on the glycan array (Figure 3G), whereas we expected to see only binding to Neu5Gc as with H5VN Y161A. This may explain that the H5HK Y161A virus still infected CMAH−/− mice through their Neu5Ac receptors.
We now know that Neu5Gc and Neu5Ac binding on tissues and erythrocytes (chicken and horse) not always fully corresponds to glycan array data, possibly because different glycans are present in the assays [114]. We did however expect larger differences between viruses with Neu5Ac and dual Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc specificity since previously it was shown that influenza viruses with dual α2,6 and α2,3 linkage specificities transmitted less efficiently among ferrets than viruses with a specificity for a single linkage type of sialic acids [115,116,117].

4. Discussion

4.1. Relevance of Neu5Gc in Animal Models for Human Influenza

Considering space usage, ethical considerations, and experimental costs, small animal models (mouse, ferret, guinea pig, rat, tree shrew, or Syrian hamster) are preferred over non-human primates and swine for experiments with human influenza viruses. Non-human primates are also not preferred because Old World monkeys, which are mostly used for influenza research [46,47], among which the macaques, have an intact CMAH gene and express Neu5Gc [105] and mainly α2,3 linked sialic acids. They are thus very different from humans in the sialic acid content and susceptibility to human influenza A viruses.
Guinea pigs are commonly used small animal models that express both Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc and mainly α2,3 linked sialic acids in the respiratory tract. Guinea pigs can be infected by human influenza viruses, but human symptoms of influenza infection are only reflected to a low extent and just a few immunological reagents are available. Recently, Syrian hamsters have been extensively used to investigate SARS-CoV-2 [118,119] which suggests that these animals closely resemble human respiratory tract properties. Both α2,3 and α2,6 linked sialic acids are present in their respiratory tract and Syrian hamsters can be infected by unadapted human influenza viruses. However, as we showed here for the first time, Neu5Gc is expressed in their lungs, although not on the epithelium of the bronchioles.
In fact, we observe quite different expression profiles of Neu5Ac versus Neu5Gc not only in the Syrian hamster but also in other influenza A virus animal models. This could be the virtue of using an H5VN Y161A mutant lectin with specificity to a subset of Neu5Gc capped N-glycans to which we initially screened it for [3]. On the other hand, the commonly using anti-Neu5Gc antibody is raised against a glycolipid structure [12,120]. It would be interesting to compare several Neu5Gc specific lectins to elucidate cell- and organ-specific Neu5Gc expression profiles.
Mice are one of the most favored models because they are widely available, relatively inexpensive, and easy to keep. However, mice are hardly naturally susceptible to infection with human influenza viruses, possibly because they express mainly α2,3 linked sialic acids with both Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc modifications. Previously, mice with modified glycosylation patterns, namely ST6GAL1 knockout mice which are not able to produce α2,6 linked sialic acids, were used to investigate the infectivity of human influenza viruses. The ST6GALT1 knockout model still supported replication of human influenza viruses, although these viruses were mouse-adapted and therefore probably bound to α2,3 linked sialic acids [121]. Here, we did not observe a difference in infectivity in CMAH−/− knockout and WT mice upon infection by H5N1 viruses binding Neu5Ac or with a dual Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc receptor specificity. In contrast, older literature clearly shows the importance of Neu5Gc specificity in experimental animals [111].
Although the ferret model is complicated and expensive, it is still the best model to mimic influenza infection in humans. Ferrets resemble humans very closely in terms of lung structure, susceptibility, and disease pathogenesis [34,49,54]. Importantly, the sialic acid content is very similar to that of humans, as they lack Neu5Gc and have a high α2,6 linked Neu5Ac expression in the respiratory tract. Indeed the importance of α2,6 versus α2,3 linked sialic linkage specificity has been reported extensively [122,123,124,125,126].

4.2. Remaining Questions on the Role of Neu5Gc and Neu5Gc Binding

In this article, we described the presence of Neu5Gc in the animal models that are most commonly used to study human influenza. However, a quantification of the amounts of Neu5Gc present in the nasal tract, upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, and lungs is still lacking. More information on this topic would provide insights into the suitability of different animal models for human influenza research.
Since Neu5Gc is present in many animal models but is lacking in humans, it is important to investigate the role of Neu5Gc in influenza virus infection. We concluded that Neu5Gc is most likely not used as a decoy receptor. However, the exact role of Neu5Gc, and whether Neu5Gc is used as a functional receptor, remains to be elucidated. Further research comparing animal models with and without Neu5Gc and studies using Neu5Gc binding viruses would be beneficial to improve the understanding of the role of Neu5Gc in influenza virus infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.S. and R.P.d.V.; methodology, C.M.S., N.N., M.O.; formal analysis, C.M.S., R.P.d.V.; investigation, C.M.S., N.N., M.O.; resources, H.T., G.-J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.S., R.P.d.V.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, C.M.S., R.P.d.V.; supervision, R.P.d.V.; project administration, R.P.d.V.; funding acquisition, G.-J.B., R.P.d.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

R.P.d.V. is a recipient of an ERC Starting Grant from the European Commission (802780) and a Beijerinck Premium of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University (18-0006), and all experiments were carried out per the guidelines of this committee. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The tissues used for this study were obtained from animal necropsies performed at the Veterinary Pathologic Diagnostic Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University. These necropsies were performed for diagnostic and educational purposes and therefore no permission from the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiment was required.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Department of Equine Sciences and the Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals for supplying erythrocytes. We thank Andrea Gröne and Hélène Verheije from the Division of Pathology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Utrecht University for providing paraffin-embedded tissues. We thank Barry Rockx from the department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the Netherlands for providing the hamster lung tissues. We thank Richard Wubbolts for allowing us to use the microscopes of the Centre for Cell Imaging at Utrecht University. We would like to thank Yoshihiro Sakoda (Hokkaido University, Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine) for helping with the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ge, S.; Wang, Z. An overview of influenza A virus receptors. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gambaryan, A.S.; Matrosovich, T.Y.; Philipp, J.; Munster, V.J.; Fouchier, R.A.; Cattoli, G.; Capua, I.; Krauss, S.L.; Webster, R.G.; Banks, J.; et al. Receptor-binding profiles of H7 subtype influenza viruses in different host species. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 4370–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Broszeit, F.; Tzarum, N.; Zhu, X.; Nemanichvili, N.; Eggink, D.; Leenders, T.; Li, Z.; Liu, L.; Wolfert, M.A.; Papanikolaou, A.; et al. N-glycolylneuraminic acid as a receptor for influenza A viruses. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 3284–3294.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Peri, S.; Kulkarni, A.; Feyertag, F.; Berninsone, P.M.; Alvarez-Ponce, D. Phylogenetic distribution of CMP-Neu5Ac hydroxylase (CMAH), the enzyme synthetizing the proinflammatory human xenoantigen Neu5Gc. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Altman, M.O.; Gagneux, P. Absence of Neu5Gc and presence of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies in humans-an evolutionary perspective. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Yoshida, Y.; Furukawa, J.I.; Naito, S.; Higashino, K.; Numata, Y.; Shinohara, Y. Quantitative analysis of total serum glycome in human and mouse. Proteomics 2016, 16, 2747–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Varki, A. Loss of N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans: Mechanisms, consequences, and implications for hominid evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2001, 116 (Suppl. 33), 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jahan, M.; Thomson, P.C.; Wynn, P.C.; Wang, B. The non-human glycan, N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), is not expressed in all organs and skeletal muscles of nine animal species. Food Chem. 2021, 343, 128439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raju, T.S.; Briggs, J.B.; Borge, S.M.; Jones, A.J. Species-specific variation in glycosylation of IgG: Evidence for the species-specific sialylation and branch-specific galactosylation and importance for engineering recombinant glycoprotein therapeutics. Glycobiology 2000, 10, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bleckmann, C.; Geyer, H.; Lieberoth, A.; Splittstoesser, F.; Liu, Y.; Feizi, T.; Schachner, M.; Kleene, R.; Reinhold, V.; Geyer, R. O-glycosylation pattern of CD24 from mouse brain. Biol. Chem. 2009, 390, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gizaw, S.T.; Koda, T.; Amano, M.; Kamimura, K.; Ohashi, T.; Hinou, H.; Nishimura, S. A comprehensive glycome profiling of Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1850, 1704–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Diaz, S.L.; Padler-Karavani, V.; Ghaderi, D.; Hurtado-Ziola, N.; Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Brinkman-Van der Linden, E.C.; Varki, A.; Varki, N.M. Sensitive and specific detection of the non-human sialic acid N-glycolylneuraminic acid in human tissues and biotherapeutic products. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Reiding, K.R.; Hipgrave Ederveen, A.L.; Rombouts, Y.; Wuhrer, M. Murine plasma N-Glycosylation traits associated with sex and strain. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 3489–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ghaderi, D.; Springer, S.A.; Ma, F.; Cohen, M.; Secrest, P.; Taylor, R.E.; Varki, A.; Gagneux, P. Sexual selection by female immunity against paternal antigens can fix loss of function alleles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17743–17748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hedlund, M.; Tangvoranuntakul, P.; Takematsu, H.; Long, J.M.; Housley, G.D.; Kozutsumi, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Wynshaw-Boris, A.; Ryan, A.F.; Gallo, R.L.; et al. N-glycolylneuraminic acid deficiency in mice: Implications for human biology and evolution. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27, 4340–4346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gagneux, P.; Cheriyan, M.; Hurtado-Ziola, N.; van der Linden, E.C.; Anderson, D.; McClure, H.; Varki, A.; Varki, N.M. Human-specific regulation of α2-6-linked sialic acids. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 48245–48250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Jia, N.; Barclay, W.S.; Roberts, K.; Yen, H.L.; Chan, R.W.; Lam, A.K.; Air, G.; Peiris, J.S.; Dell, A.; Nicholls, J.M.; et al. Glycomic characterization of respiratory tract tissues of ferrets: Implications for its use in influenza virus infection studies. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 28489–28504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ng, P.S.; Bohm, R.; Hartley-Tassell, L.E.; Steen, J.A.; Wang, H.; Lukowski, S.W.; Hawthorne, P.L.; Trezise, A.E.; Coloe, P.J.; Grimmond, S.M.; et al. Ferrets exclusively synthesize Neu5Ac and express naturally humanized influenza A virus receptors. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Zou, G.; Kosikova, M.; Kim, S.R.; Kotian, S.; Wu, W.W.; Shen, R.; Powers, D.N.; Agarabi, C.; Xie, H.; Ju, T. Comprehensive analysis of N-glycans in IgG purified from ferrets with or without influenza A virus infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 19277–19289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Naito, Y.; Takematsu, H.; Koyama, S.; Miyake, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Fujinawa, R.; Sugai, M.; Okuno, Y.; Tsujimoto, G.; Yamaji, T.; et al. Germinal center marker GL7 probes activation-dependent repression of N-glycolylneuraminic acid, a sialic acid species involved in the negative modulation of B-cell activation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27, 3008–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Harbury, P.B.; Zhang, T.; Kim, P.S.; Alber, T. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science 1993, 262, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nemanichvili, N.; Tomris, I.; Turner, H.L.; McBride, R.; Grant, O.C.; van der Woude, R.; Aldosari, M.H.; Pieters, R.J.; Woods, R.J.; Paulson, J.C.; et al. Fluorescent trimeric hemagglutinins reveal multivalent receptor binding properties. J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 842–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shaner, N.C.; Lin, M.Z.; McKeown, M.R.; Steinbach, P.A.; Hazelwood, K.L.; Davidson, M.W.; Tsien, R.Y. Improving the photostability of bright monomeric orange and red fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. De Vries, R.P.; de Vries, E.; Bosch, B.J.; de Groot, R.J.; Rottier, P.J.; de Haan, C.A. The influenza A virus hemagglutinin glycosylation state affects receptor-binding specificity. Virology 2010, 403, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zeng, Q.; Langereis, M.A.; van Vliet, A.L.; Huizinga, E.G.; de Groot, R.J. Structure of coronavirus hemagglutinin-esterase offers insight into corona and influenza virus evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9065–9069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bouwman, K.M.; Parsons, L.M.; Berends, A.J.; de Vries, R.P.; Cipollo, J.F.; Verheije, M.H. Three amino acid changes in avian coronavirus spike protein allow binding to kidney tissue. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wickramasinghe, I.N.; de Vries, R.P.; Grone, A.; de Haan, C.A.; Verheije, M.H. Binding of avian coronavirus spike proteins to host factors reflects virus tropism and pathogenicity. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 8903–8912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yasue, S.; Handa, S.; Miyagawa, S.; Inoue, J.; Hasegawa, A.; Yamakawa, T. Difference in form of sialic acid in red blood cell glycolipids of different breeds of dogs. J. Biochem. 1978, 83, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hiono, T.; Okamatsu, M.; Yamamoto, N.; Ogasawara, K.; Endo, M.; Kuribayashi, S.; Shichinohe, S.; Motohashi, Y.; Chu, D.H.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Experimental infection of highly and low pathogenic avian influenza viruses to chickens, ducks, tree sparrows, jungle crows, and black rats for the evaluation of their roles in virus transmission. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 182, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Radigan, K.A.; Misharin, A.V.; Chi, M.; Budinger, G.S. Modeling human influenza infection in the laboratory. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015, 8, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Thangavel, R.R.; Bouvier, N.M. Animal models for influenza virus pathogenesis, transmission, and immunology. J. Immunol. Methods 2014, 410, 60–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Nakajima, N.; Ichiko, Y.; Sakai-Tagawa, Y.; Noda, T.; Hasegawa, H.; Kawaoka, Y. Syrian hamster as an animal model for the study of human influenza virus infection. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Samet, S.J.; Tompkins, S.M. Influenza pathogenesis in genetically defined resistant and susceptible murine strains. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2017, 90, 471–479. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mifsud, E.J.; Tai, C.M.; Hurt, A.C. Animal models used to assess influenza antivirals. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2018, 13, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Albrecht, R.A.; Liu, W.C.; Sant, A.J.; Tompkins, S.M.; Pekosz, A.; Meliopoulos, V.; Cherry, S.; Thomas, P.G.; Schultz-Cherry, S. Moving forward: Recent developments for the ferret biomedical research model. mBio 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Belser, J.A.; Eckert, A.M.; Huynh, T.; Gary, J.M.; Ritter, J.M.; Tumpey, T.M.; Maines, T.R. A guide for the use of the ferret model for influenza virus infection. Am. J. Pathol. 2020, 190, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Belser, J.A.; Eckert, A.M.; Tumpey, T.M.; Maines, T.R. Complexities in ferret influenza virus pathogenesis and transmission models. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Maher, J.A.; DeStefano, J. The ferret: An animal model to study influenza virus. Lab. Anim. N. Y. 2004, 33, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ottolini, M.G.; Blanco, J.C.G.; Eichelberger, M.C.; Porter, D.D.; Pletneva, L.; Richardson, J.Y.; Prince, G.A. The cotton rat provides a useful small-animal model for the study of influenza virus pathogenesis. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 2823–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Green, M.G.; Huey, D.; Niewiesk, S. The cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) as an animal model for respiratory tract infections with human pathogens. Lab. Anim. N. Y. 2013, 42, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bouvier, N.M. Animal models for influenza virus transmission studies: A historical perspective. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 13, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Li, R.; Yuan, B.; Xia, X.; Zhang, S.; Du, Q.; Yang, C.; Li, N.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, R.; et al. Tree shrew as a new animal model to study the pathogenesis of avian influenza (H9N2) virus infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Yang, Z.F.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, Y.T.; Wang, Y.T.; Liu, R.; Zhao, S.S.; Li, R.F.; Yang, C.G.; Li, J.Q.; Zhong, N.S. The tree shrew provides a useful alternative model for the study of influenza H1N1 virus. Virol. J. 2013, 10, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Holzer, B.; Martini, V.; Edmans, M.; Tchilian, E. T and B cell immune responses to influenza viruses in pigs. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Nakajima, N.; Kiso, M.; Takahashi, K.; Ito, M.; Inoue, T.; Horiuchi, M.; Okahara, N.; Sasaki, E.; Hasegawa, H.; et al. The marmoset as an animal model of influenza: Infection with A(H1N1)pdm09 and highly pathogenic A(H5N1) viruses via the conventional or tracheal spray route. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Davis, A.S.; Taubenberger, J.K.; Bray, M. The use of nonhuman primates in research on seasonal, pandemic and avian influenza, 1893-2014. Antivir. Res. 2015, 117, 75–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Manickam, C.; Shah, S.V.; Lucar, O.; Ram, D.R.; Reeves, R.K. Cytokine-mediated tissue injury in non-human primate models of viral infections. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moncla, L.H.; Ross, T.M.; Dinis, J.M.; Weinfurter, J.T.; Mortimer, T.D.; Schultz-Darken, N.; Brunner, K.; Capuano, S.V., 3rd; Boettcher, C.; Post, J.; et al. A novel nonhuman primate model for influenza transmission. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Oh, D.Y.; Hurt, A.C. Using the ferret as an animal model for investigating influenza antiviral effectiveness. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Padilla-Carlin, D.J.; McMurray, D.N.; Hickey, A.J. The guinea pig as a model of infectious diseases. Comp. Med. 2008, 58, 324–340. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Miao, J.; Chard, L.S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y. Syrian hamster as an animal model for the study on infectious diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Yao, Y.G. Creating animal models, why not use the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis)? Zool Res. 2017, 38, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Meurens, F.; Summerfield, A.; Nauwynck, H.; Saif, L.; Gerdts, V. The pig: A model for human infectious diseases. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wong, J.; Layton, D.; Wheatley, A.K.; Kent, S.J. Improving immunological insights into the ferret model of human viral infectious disease. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2019, 13, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tripp, R.A.; Tompkins, S.M. Animal models for evaluation of influenza vaccines. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 333, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rajao, D.S.; Vincent, A.L. Swine as a model for influenza A virus infection and immunity. ILAR J. 2015, 56, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Miller, L.A.; Royer, C.M.; Pinkerton, K.E.; Schelegle, E.S. Nonhuman primate models of respiratory disease: Past, present, and future. ILAR J. 2017, 58, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Belser, J.A.; Katz, J.M.; Tumpey, T.M. The ferret as a model organism to study influenza A virus infection. Dis. Model Mech. 2011, 4, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Kennedy, A.R.; Desrosiers, A.; Terzaghi, M.; Little, J.B. Morphometric and histological analysis of the lungs of Syrian golden hamsters. J. Anat. 1978, 125, 527–553. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Ye, L.; He, M.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Lei, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X. Tree shrew as a new animal model for the study of lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 2091–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Canning, B.J.; Chou, Y. Using guinea pigs in studies relevant to asthma and COPD. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 21, 702–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Pan, H.; Deutsch, G.H.; Wert, S.E.; On behalf of the Ontology Subcommittee; NHLBI Molecular Atlas of Lung Development Program Consortium. Comprehensive anatomic ontologies for lung development: A comparison of alveolar formation and maturation within mouse and human lung. J. Biomed. Semant. 2019, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Zhang, J.; Xiao, H.; Bi, Y.; Long, Q.; Gong, Y.; Dai, J.; Sun, M.; Cun, W. Characteristics of the tree shrew humoral immune system. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 127, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tchilian, E.; Holzer, B. Harnessing local immunity for an effective universal swine influenza vaccine. Viruses 2017, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Chua, S.; Tan, H.Q.; Engelberg, D.; Lim, L.H.K. Alternative experimental models for studying influenza proteins, host-virus interactions and anti-influenza drugs. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Messaoudi, I.; Estep, R.; Robinson, B.; Wong, S.W. Nonhuman primate models of human immunology. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011, 14, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Barreiro, L.B.; Marioni, J.C.; Blekhman, R.; Stephens, M.; Gilad, Y. Functional comparison of innate immune signaling pathways in primates. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Varki, N.M.; Strobert, E.; Dick, E.J., Jr.; Benirschke, K.; Varki, A. Biomedical differences between human and nonhuman hominids: Potential roles for uniquely human aspects of sialic acid biology. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2011, 6, 365–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Redelinghuys, P.; Antonopoulos, A.; Liu, Y.; Campanero-Rhodes, M.A.; McKenzie, E.; Haslam, S.M.; Dell, A.; Feizi, T.; Crocker, P.R. Early murine T-lymphocyte activation is accompanied by a switch from N-glycolyl- to N-acetyl-neuraminic acid and generation of ligands for siglec-E. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 34522–34532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Naito-Matsui, Y.; Takada, S.; Kano, Y.; Iyoda, T.; Sugai, M.; Shimizu, A.; Inaba, K.; Nitschke, L.; Tsubata, T.; Oka, S.; et al. Functional evaluation of activation-dependent alterations in the sialoglycan composition of T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 1564–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Buchlis, G.; Odorizzi, P.; Soto, P.C.; Pearce, O.M.; Hui, D.J.; Jordan, M.S.; Varki, A.; Wherry, E.J.; High, K.A. Enhanced T cell function in a mouse model of human glycosylation. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kreijtz, J.H.; Bodewes, R.; van Amerongen, G.; Kuiken, T.; Fouchier, R.A.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F. Primary influenza A virus infection induces cross-protective immunity against a lethal infection with a heterosubtypic virus strain in mice. Vaccine 2007, 25, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nachbagauer, R.; Choi, A.; Hirsh, A.; Margine, I.; Iida, S.; Barrera, A.; Ferres, M.; Albrecht, R.A.; Garcia-Sastre, A.; Bouvier, N.M.; et al. Defining the antibody cross-reactome directed against the influenza virus surface glycoproteins. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Allen, J.D.; Jang, H.; DiNapoli, J.; Kleanthous, H.; Ross, T.M. Elicitation of protective antibodies against 20 years of future H3N2 cocirculating influenza virus variants in ferrets preimmune to historical H3N2 influenza viruses. J. Virol. 2019, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Music, N.; Tzeng, W.P.; Liaini Gross, F.; Levine, M.Z.; Xu, X.; Shieh, W.J.; Tumpey, T.M.; Katz, J.M.; York, I.A. Repeated vaccination against matched H3N2 influenza virus gives less protection than single vaccination in ferrets. NPJ Vaccines 2019, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Skarlupka, A.L.; Ross, T.M. Immune imprinting in the influenza ferret model. Vaccines 2020, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Karlsson, E.A.; Engel, G.A.; Feeroz, M.M.; San, S.; Rompis, A.; Lee, B.P.; Shaw, E.; Oh, G.; Schillaci, M.A.; Grant, R.; et al. Influenza virus infection in nonhuman primates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1672–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Collaborative Cross, C. The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics 2012, 190, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Leist, S.R.; Pilzner, C.; van den Brand, J.M.; Dengler, L.; Geffers, R.; Kuiken, T.; Balling, R.; Kollmus, H.; Schughart, K. Influenza H3N2 infection of the collaborative cross founder strains reveals highly divergent host responses and identifies a unique phenotype in CAST/EiJ mice. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Boon, A.C.; deBeauchamp, J.; Hollmann, A.; Luke, J.; Kotb, M.; Rowe, S.; Finkelstein, D.; Neale, G.; Lu, L.; Williams, R.W.; et al. Host genetic variation affects resistance to infection with a highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in mice. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 10417–10426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Boon, A.C.; deBeauchamp, J.; Krauss, S.; Rubrum, A.; Webb, A.D.; Webster, R.G.; McElhaney, J.; Webby, R.J. Cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies directed against pandemic H1N1 2009 virus are protective in a highly sensitive DBA/2 mouse influenza model. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 7662–7667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Pica, N.; Iyer, A.; Ramos, I.; Bouvier, N.M.; Fernandez-Sesma, A.; Garcia-Sastre, A.; Lowen, A.C.; Palese, P.; Steel, J. The DBA.2 mouse is susceptible to disease following infection with a broad, but limited, range of influenza A and B viruses. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 12825–12829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Srivastava, B.; Blazejewska, P.; Hessmann, M.; Bruder, D.; Geffers, R.; Mauel, S.; Gruber, A.D.; Schughart, K. Host genetic background strongly influences the response to influenza a virus infections. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Trammell, R.A.; Liberati, T.A.; Toth, L.A. Host genetic background and the innate inflammatory response of lung to influenza virus. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Everitt, A.R.; Clare, S.; Pertel, T.; John, S.P.; Wash, R.S.; Smith, S.E.; Chin, C.R.; Feeley, E.M.; Sims, J.S.; Adams, D.J.; et al. IFITM3 restricts the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza. Nature 2012, 484, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shin, D.L.; Hatesuer, B.; Bergmann, S.; Nedelko, T.; Schughart, K. Protection from severe influenza virus infections in mice carrying the Mx1 influenza virus resistance gene strongly depends on genetic background. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 9998–10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Huang, C.H.; Chen, C.J.; Yen, C.T.; Yu, C.P.; Huang, P.N.; Kuo, R.L.; Lin, S.J.; Chang, C.K.; Shih, S.R. Caspase-1 deficient mice are more susceptible to influenza A virus infection with PA variation. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1898–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Schauer, R. Sialic acids as link to Japanese scientists. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2016, 92, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Löfling, J.; Lyi, S.M.; Parrish, C.R.; Varki, A. Canine and feline parvoviruses preferentially recognize the non-human cell surface sialic acid N-glycolylneuraminic acid. Virology 2013, 440, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Martin, P.T.; Golden, B.; Okerblom, J.; Camboni, M.; Chandrasekharan, K.; Xu, R.; Varki, A.; Flanigan, K.M.; Kornegay, J.N. A comparative study of N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) and cytotoxic T cell (CT) carbohydrate expression in normal and dystrophin-deficient dog and human skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Sun, Y.; Bi, Y.; Pu, J.; Hu, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, H.; Liu, L.; Xu, Q.; Tan, Y.; Liu, M.; et al. Guinea pig model for evaluating the potential public health risk of swine and avian influenza viruses. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Iwersen, M.; Vandamme-Feldhaus, V.; Schauer, R. Enzymatic 4-O-acetylation of N-acetylneuraminic acid in guinea-pig liver. Glycoconj J. 1998, 15, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Blanco, J.C.; Pletneva, L.M.; Wan, H.; Araya, Y.; Angel, M.; Oue, R.O.; Sutton, T.C.; Perez, D.R. Receptor characterization and susceptibility of cotton rats to avian and 2009 pandemic influenza virus strains. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 2036–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Gao, W.N.; Yau, L.F.; Liu, L.; Zeng, X.; Chen, D.C.; Jiang, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.R.; Jiang, Z.H. Microfluidic chip-LC/MS-based glycomic analysis revealed distinct N-glycan profile of rat serum. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Yau, L.F.; Chan, K.M.; Yang, C.G.; Ip, S.W.; Kang, Y.; Mai, Z.T.; Tong, T.T.; Jiang, Z.H.; Yang, Z.F.; Wang, J.R. Comprehensive glycomic profiling of respiratory tract tissues of tree shrews by TiO(2)-PGC chip mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 1470–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bateman, A.C.; Karamanska, R.; Busch, M.G.; Dell, A.; Olsen, C.W.; Haslam, S.M. Glycan analysis and influenza A virus infection of primary swine respiratory epithelial cells: The importance of NeuAcα2-6 glycans. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 34016–34026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Nakajima, N.; Shibata, M.; Takahashi, K.; Sato, Y.; Kiso, M.; Yamayoshi, S.; Ito, M.; Enya, S.; Otake, M.; et al. The microminipig as an animal model for influenza A virus infection. J. Virol. 2017, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Byrd-Leotis, L.; Liu, R.; Bradley, K.C.; Lasanajak, Y.; Cummings, S.F.; Song, X.; Heimburg-Molinaro, J.; Galloway, S.E.; Culhane, M.R.; Smith, D.F.; et al. Shotgun glycomics of pig lung identifies natural endogenous receptors for influenza viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2241–E2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Tao, N.; Ochonicky, K.L.; German, J.B.; Donovan, S.M.; Lebrilla, C.B. Structural determination and daily variations of porcine milk oligosaccharides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4653–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Cooper, D.K. Modifying the sugar icing on the transplantation cake. Glycobiology 2016, 26, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Kim, Y.G.; Oh, J.Y.; Gil, G.C.; Kim, M.K.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.J.; Wee, W.R.; Kim, B.G. Identification of alpha-Gal and non-Gal epitopes in pig corneal endothelial cells and keratocytes by using mass spectrometry. Curr. Eye Res. 2009, 34, 877–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Burlak, C.; Bern, M.; Brito, A.E.; Isailovic, D.; Wang, Z.Y.; Estrada, J.L.; Li, P.; Tector, A.J. N-linked glycan profiling of GGTA1/CMAH knockout pigs identifies new potential carbohydrate xenoantigens. Xenotransplantation 2013, 20, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Suzuki, T.; Horiike, G.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kawabe, K.; Masuda, H.; Miyamoto, D.; Matsuda, M.; Nishimura, S.I.; Yamagata, T.; Ito, T.; et al. Swine influenza virus strains recognize sialylsugar chains containing the molecular species of sialic acid predominantly present in the swine tracheal epithelium. FEBS Lett. 1997, 404, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Sriwilaijaroen, N.; Kondo, S.; Yagi, H.; Takemae, N.; Saito, T.; Hiramatsu, H.; Kato, K.; Suzuki, Y. N-glycans from porcine trachea and lung: Predominant NeuAcα2-6Gal could be a selective pressure for influenza variants in favor of human-type receptor. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Springer, S.A.; Diaz, S.L.; Gagneux, P. Parallel evolution of a self-signal: Humans and new world monkeys independently lost the cell surface sugar Neu5Gc. Immunogenetics 2014, 66, 671–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Li, Q.; Shaikh, S.; Iwase, H.; Long, C.; Lee, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ayares, D.; Cooper, D.K.C.; Hara, H. Carbohydrate antigen expression and anti-pig antibodies in New World capuchin monkeys: Relevance to studies of xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019, 26, e12498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Daly, J.M.; Blunden, A.S.; Macrae, S.; Miller, J.; Bowman, S.J.; Kolodziejek, J.; Nowotny, N.; Smith, K.C. Transmission of equine influenza virus to English foxhounds. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Barnard, K.N.; Alford-Lawrence, B.K.; Buchholz, D.W.; Wasik, B.R.; LaClair, J.R.; Yu, H.; Honce, R.; Ruhl, S.; Pajic, P.; Daugherity, E.K.; et al. Modified sialic acids on mucus and erythrocytes inhibit influenza A virus hemagglutinin and neuraminidase functions. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hashimoto, Y.; Yamakawa, T.; Tanabe, Y. Further studies on the red cell glycolipids of various breeds of dogs. A possible assumption about the origin of Japanese dogs. J. Biochem. 1984, 96, 1777–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wen, F.; Blackmon, S.; Olivier, A.K.; Li, L.; Guan, M.; Sun, H.; Wang, P.G.; Wan, X.F. Mutation W222L at the receptor binding site of hemagglutinin could facilitate viral adaption from equine influenza A (H3N8) virus to dogs. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Suzuki, Y.; Ito, T.; Suzuki, T.; Holland, R.E., Jr.; Chambers, T.M.; Kiso, M.; Ishida, H.; Kawaoka, Y. Sialic acid species as a determinant of the host range of influenza A viruses. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 11825–11831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Takahashi, T.; Takano, M.; Kurebayashi, Y.; Masuda, M.; Kawagishi, S.; Takaguchi, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Minami, A.; Otsubo, T.; Ikeda, K.; et al. N-glycolylneuraminic acid on human epithelial cells prevents entry of influenza A viruses that possess N-glycolylneuraminic acid binding ability. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 8445–8456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Higa, H.H.; Rogers, G.N.; Paulson, J.C. Influenza virus hemagglutinins differentiate between receptor determinants bearing N-acetyl-, N-glycollyl-, and N,O-diacetylneuraminic acids. Virology 1985, 144, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Spruit, C.M.; Zhu, X.; Broszeit, F.; Han, A.X.; van der Woude, R.; Bouwman, K.M.; Luu, M.M.T.; Russell, C.A.; Wilson, I.A.; Boons, G.-J.; et al. N-glycolylneuraminic acid binding of avian H7 influenza A viruses. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tumpey, T.M.; Maines, T.R.; Van Hoeven, N.; Glaser, L.; Solorzano, A.; Pappas, C.; Cox, N.J.; Swayne, D.E.; Palese, P.; Katz, J.M.; et al. A two-amino acid change in the hemagglutinin of the 1918 influenza virus abolishes transmission. Science 2007, 315, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Maines, T.R.; Chen, L.M.; Matsuoka, Y.; Chen, H.; Rowe, T.; Ortin, J.; Falcon, A.; Nguyen, T.H.; Mai le, Q.; Sedyaningsih, E.R.; et al. Lack of transmission of H5N1 avian-human reassortant influenza viruses in a ferret model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12121–12126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Gambaryan, A.; Tuzikov, A.; Pazynina, G.; Bovin, N.; Balish, A.; Klimov, A. Evolution of the receptor binding phenotype of influenza A (H5) viruses. Virology 2006, 344, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Imai, M.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Hatta, M.; Loeber, S.; Halfmann, P.J.; Nakajima, N.; Watanabe, T.; Ujie, M.; Takahashi, K.; Ito, M.; et al. Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 16587–16595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Rosenke, K.; Meade-White, K.; Letko, M.; Clancy, C.; Hansen, F.; Liu, Y.; Okumura, A.; Tang-Huau, T.L.; Li, R.; Saturday, G.; et al. Defining the Syrian hamster as a highly susceptible preclinical model for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 2673–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Padler-Karavani, V.; Yu, H.; Cao, H.; Chokhawala, H.; Karp, F.; Varki, N.; Chen, X.; Varki, A. Diversity in specificity, abundance, and composition of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies in normal humans: Potential implications for disease. Glycobiology 2008, 18, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Glaser, L.; Conenello, G.; Paulson, J.; Palese, P. Effective replication of human influenza viruses in mice lacking a major α2,6 sialyltransferase. Virus Res. 2007, 126, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Long, J.S.; Mistry, B.; Haslam, S.M.; Barclay, W.S. Host and viral determinants of influenza A virus species specificity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ji, Y.; White, Y.J.; Hadden, J.A.; Grant, O.C.; Woods, R.J. New insights into influenza A specificity: An evolution of paradigms. Curr. Opin. Struct Biol. 2017, 44, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. De Vries, R.P.; Zhu, X.; McBride, R.; Rigter, A.; Hanson, A.; Zhong, G.; Hatta, M.; Xu, R.; Yu, W.; Kawaoka, Y.; et al. Hemagglutinin receptor specificity and structural analyses of respiratory droplet-transmissible H5N1 viruses. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 768–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. De Vries, R.P.; de Vries, E.; Moore, K.S.; Rigter, A.; Rottier, P.J.; de Haan, C.A. Only two residues are responsible for the dramatic difference in receptor binding between swine and new pandemic H1 hemagglutinin. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 5868–5875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. De Vries, R.P.; Tzarum, N.; Peng, W.; Thompson, A.J.; Ambepitiya Wickramasinghe, I.N.; de la Pena, A.T.T.; van Breemen, M.J.; Bouwman, K.M.; Zhu, X.; McBride, R.; et al. A single mutation in Taiwanese H6N1 influenza hemagglutinin switches binding to human-type receptors. EMBO Mol. Med. 2017, 9, 1314–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 13 00815 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc).
Figure 1. Structure of N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc).
Viruses 13 00815 g001
Viruses 13 00815 g002 550
Figure 2. Visualization of the presence of α2,3 linked Neu5Ac (WT HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1)), α2,3 linked Neu5Gc (Y161A mutant HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1)), and α2,6 linked sialic acids (SNA) using AEC staining on lung tissue of mouse (C57BL/6), ferret, guinea pig, Syrian hamster, and domestic swine. Brown staining indicates binding of the HAs to the tissue and blue indicates the cells. Selected bronchioles (black arrows) and blood vessels (blue arrows) are indicated. Images are representative of two independent experiments.
Figure 2. Visualization of the presence of α2,3 linked Neu5Ac (WT HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1)), α2,3 linked Neu5Gc (Y161A mutant HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1)), and α2,6 linked sialic acids (SNA) using AEC staining on lung tissue of mouse (C57BL/6), ferret, guinea pig, Syrian hamster, and domestic swine. Brown staining indicates binding of the HAs to the tissue and blue indicates the cells. Selected bronchioles (black arrows) and blood vessels (blue arrows) are indicated. Images are representative of two independent experiments.
Viruses 13 00815 g002
Viruses 13 00815 g003 550
Figure 3. H5 WT and HA-Y161A binding properties and infectivity in WT (C57BL/6) and CMAH−/− mice. (A) A hemagglutination assay (n = 3) with canine and equine erythrocytes was performed using HAs of WT and Y161A mutants of—A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5VN) and A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5HK). (B) Tissue binding of the HA of H5HK WT and mutant Y161A on canine and equine trachea is visualized with AEC staining (representative for three independent assays), the scale bar represents 100 µm. (C) Mice lungs (WT and CMAH−/− knockout) were stained in duplicate with anti-Neu5Gc IgY and binding was visualized with AEC staining. WT (C57BL/6) and CMAH−/− knockout mice (n = 5) were infected with H5HK WT and HA-Y161A mutant virus and (D) the survival and (E) body weight curves are shown, together with the (F) PFU per gram at 3 dpi in the lungs (n = 5), *** indicates a p-value of 0.0007 in an unpaired two-tailed t-test. (G) Synthetic glycans printed on the microarray (n = 6), either without sialic acid (structures 1–3, light gray), with α2,6-linked Neu5Ac (4–6, black), α2,3-linked Neu5Ac (7–9, dark gray), α2,6-linked Neu5Gc (10–12, red) or α2,3-linked Neu5Gc (13–15, blue). Binding specifities of WT and Y161A mutant H5HK HAs were investigated.
Figure 3. H5 WT and HA-Y161A binding properties and infectivity in WT (C57BL/6) and CMAH−/− mice. (A) A hemagglutination assay (n = 3) with canine and equine erythrocytes was performed using HAs of WT and Y161A mutants of—A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5VN) and A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5HK). (B) Tissue binding of the HA of H5HK WT and mutant Y161A on canine and equine trachea is visualized with AEC staining (representative for three independent assays), the scale bar represents 100 µm. (C) Mice lungs (WT and CMAH−/− knockout) were stained in duplicate with anti-Neu5Gc IgY and binding was visualized with AEC staining. WT (C57BL/6) and CMAH−/− knockout mice (n = 5) were infected with H5HK WT and HA-Y161A mutant virus and (D) the survival and (E) body weight curves are shown, together with the (F) PFU per gram at 3 dpi in the lungs (n = 5), *** indicates a p-value of 0.0007 in an unpaired two-tailed t-test. (G) Synthetic glycans printed on the microarray (n = 6), either without sialic acid (structures 1–3, light gray), with α2,6-linked Neu5Ac (4–6, black), α2,3-linked Neu5Ac (7–9, dark gray), α2,6-linked Neu5Gc (10–12, red) or α2,3-linked Neu5Gc (13–15, blue). Binding specifities of WT and Y161A mutant H5HK HAs were investigated.
Viruses 13 00815 g003
Table
Table 1. Overview of sialic acid linkages in the respiratory tract, the presence of Neu5Gc, and the presence of an intact CMAH gene in different animal models. +: high levels, -: low levels, --: not detected.
Table 1. Overview of sialic acid linkages in the respiratory tract, the presence of Neu5Gc, and the presence of an intact CMAH gene in different animal models. +: high levels, -: low levels, --: not detected.
Animal ModelSialic Acid Linkage in the Respiratory TractNeu5Gc DetectedIntact CMAH Gene [4]
α2,3α2,6
Mouse+ [1]- [1,16]
Yes [6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,89,90]
Yes (Figure 2)		Yes
Ferret+ [17]
- (upper respiratory tract) [1]
+ (lung) [1]		+ [17]
+ (upper respiratory tract) [1]
- (lung) [1]		No [17,18,19]
No (Figure 2)		No
Guinea pig+ (nasal tract, trachea) [91]
+ (lung) [91]		+ (nasal tract, trachea) [91]
- (lung) [91]		Yes [9,92]
Yes (Figure 2)		Yes
Rat+ (trachea) [93]
-- (lung) [93]		+ (trachea) [93]
- (lung) [93]		Yes [9,94]Yes
Syrian hamster+ [32]+ [32]Yes (Figure 2)Yes
Tree shrew+ [95]
- (nasal tract, trachea) [43]
+ (lung) [43]		+ [95]
+ (nasal tract, trachea) [43]
- (lung) [43]		Yes [95]Yes
Swine- [1,96]
+ (nasal tract) [97]
- (trachea) [97]
+ (lung) [97,98]		+ [1,96]
- (nasal tract) [97]
+ (trachea) [97]
+ (lung) [97,98]		Yes [96,98,99,100,101,102]
Yes, 53% [103]
Yes, 9–14% [104]
Yes (Figure 2)		Yes
Marmoset + [45]-- [45]No [105]No
MacaqueUnknownUnknownYes [9,106]Yes
Dog+ [107]- [3,107]No [28,88,108]
Yes [88,89,109,110]		Yes
Horse+ [1,107,111]-- [3,107,111]Yes [3,8,108]Yes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spruit, C.M.; Nemanichvili, N.; Okamatsu, M.; Takematsu, H.; Boons, G.-J.; de Vries, R.P. N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models for Human Influenza A Virus. Viruses 2021, 13, 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050815

AMA Style

Spruit CM, Nemanichvili N, Okamatsu M, Takematsu H, Boons G-J, de Vries RP. N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models for Human Influenza A Virus. Viruses. 2021; 13(5):815. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spruit, Cindy M., Nikoloz Nemanichvili, Masatoshi Okamatsu, Hiromu Takematsu, Geert-Jan Boons, and Robert P. de Vries. 2021. "N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models for Human Influenza A Virus" Viruses 13, no. 5: 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050815

APA Style

Spruit, C. M., Nemanichvili, N., Okamatsu, M., Takematsu, H., Boons, G. -J., & de Vries, R. P. (2021). N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models for Human Influenza A Virus. Viruses, 13(5), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop