Next Article in Journal
Dairy-Derived Emulsifiers in Infant Formula Show Marginal Effects on the Plasma Lipid Profile and Brain Structure in Preterm Piglets Relative to Soy Lecithin
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship between the Gut Microbiome and Osteoarthritis Pain: Review of the Literature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/nu13030717
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D and Lung Outcomes in Elderly COVID-19 Patients

by
Alberto Sulli
1,*,†,
Emanuele Gotelli
1,†,
Andrea Casabella
1,
Sabrina Paolino
1,
Carmen Pizzorni
1,
Elisa Alessandri
1,
Marco Grosso
2,
Diego Ferone
3,
Vanessa Smith
4 and
Maurizio Cutolo
1
1
Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, 16132 Genova, Italy
2
Pneumology Unit, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, 16132 Genova, Italy
3
Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, 16132 Genova, Italy
4
Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, VIB Inflammation Research Centre Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2021, 13(3), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030717
Submission received: 19 January 2021 / Revised: 22 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 24 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and aim: Vitamin D deficiency is frequently reported in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to correlate the 25OH-Vitamin D serum concentrations with clinical parameters of lung involvement, in elderly patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive COVID-19 patients (mean age 76 ± 13 years) and sixty-five sex- and age-matched control subjects (CNT) were analyzed. The following clinical parameters, including comorbidities, were collected at admission: type of pulmonary involvement, respiratory parameters (PaO2, SO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2), laboratory parameters (including 25OH-vitamin D, D-dimer, C-reactive protein). Results: Significantly lower vitamin D serum levels were found in COVID-19 patients than in CNT (median 7.9 vs. 16.3 ng/mL, p = 0.001). Interestingly, a statistically significant positive correlation was observed between vitamin D serum levels and PaO2 (p = 0.03), SO2 (p = 0.05), PaO2/FiO2 (p = 0.02), while a statistically significant negative correlation was found between vitamin D serum levels and D-dimer (p = 0.04), C-reactive protein (p = 0.04) and percentage of O2 in a venturi mask (p = 0.04). A negative correlation was also observed between vitamin D serum levels and severity of radiologic pulmonary involvement, evaluated by computed tomography: in particular, vitamin D was found significantly lower in COVID-19 patients with either multiple lung consolidations (p = 0.0001) or diffuse/severe interstitial lung involvement than in those with mild involvement (p = 0.05). Finally, significantly lower vitamin D serum levels were found in the elderly COVID-19 patients who died during hospitalization, compared to those who survived (median 3.0 vs. 8.4 ng/mL, p = 0.046). Conclusions: This study confirms that 25OH-vitamin D serum deficiency is associated with more severe lung involvement, longer disease duration and risk of death, in elderly COVID-19 patients. The detection of low vitamin D levels also in younger COVID-19 patients with less comorbidities further suggests vitamin D deficiency as crucial risk factor at any age.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D plays a central role in bone metabolism, as well as in immune function. Concerning the latter, it regulates the growth and differentiation of several cell types involved in the immune reactivity, displaying anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory properties [1,2,3]. Therefore, vitamin D may have a key role in mediating the interactions between the innate and adaptive pathways of the immune system [4].
Vitamin D serum concentrations are usually lower in elderly people and have been inversely associated with autoimmune inflammatory disease activity and severity, as well as with risk of pulmonary infections [5,6]. Recently, a role for vitamin D deficiency has been reported also in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection [7,8].
By considering the higher prevalence of COVID-19 in older people, the aim of this study was to correlate, in elderly patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection, the 25OH-Vitamin D (25OHD) serum concentrations with clinical parameters of lung involvement.

2. Materials and Methods

Sixty-five consecutive COVID-19 patients (mean age 76 ± 13 years, mean disease duration from first symptom 13 ± 13 days, 30 males and 35 females) and sixty-five sex- and age-matched non-COVID control subjects (CNT) were enrolled in the early months of the recent pandemic (March–April 2020) and retrospectively analyzed. All patients needed hospitalization in the COVID-19 dedicated medical unit and were on oxygen therapy for severe respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, but none needed intensive care treatment or intubation at entry. COVID-19 was confirmed in all patients by positive real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on nasal swabs during hospitalization. All patients and controls were Caucasian coming from the same region of the country. Control subjects were outpatients attending the Rheumatology Clinic in the same period.
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice and all patient data were collected during the routine medical visits. All the patients gave written informed consent to manage their clinical data and the study was approved by Regional Ethics Committee (ID 10851, 459/2020).
The lung clinical parameters, along with comorbidities and laboratory parameters, were collected at admission.
The type of pulmonary involvement (localized/mild interstitial lung disease-ground glass pattern, diffuse/severe interstitial lung disease, focal lung consolidation, multiple lung consolidations) was assessed by computed tomography using a high-resolution CT imaging scanner (Siemens Definition Flash, 128 slice, Erlangen, Germany).
Respiratory parameters (PaO2, SO2, PaCO2) were measured by arterial blood gas analysis, and the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) was calculated to assess the alveolar injury and severity of hypoxemia. Blood samples collected from the radial artery were analyzed by ABL90 FLEX blood gas analyzer (Radiometer, Brønshøj, Denmark).
Laboratory parameters (25OHD, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, ferritin, LDH, blood cell count, calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, liver and renal function) were assayed by routine standardized assessments in the hospital laboratories, and blood samples were taken at 8 a.m. on the first day of hospitalization. In particular, 25OHD serum levels were measured by standardized chemiluminescence (Liaison 25OH-Vitamin D Total Assay, by DiaSorin, Milan, Italy), and the reported intra and inter assay coefficients of variation (%CV) were 5.4 and 10.6 respectively. Vitamin D serum levels were classified as sufficient, insufficient, deficient, or severely deficient, as suggested by the Endocrine Society guidelines [9].
Duration of hospitalization and global duration of COVID-19 from first symptom until recovery were also recorded.
Statistical analysis was carried out by StatView software. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare unpaired groups of variables, and the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare continuous variables with nominal variables with more than two levels. Possible associations between variables were assessed by Spearman rank correlation, simple, and multiple regression tests. Multiple linear regression models to estimate the associations between 25OHD and outcome measures were performed also after log-transformation of variables, while adjusting for possible confounders. The one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to check the normality assumption of the linear model residuals. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Any p values equal or lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant; correlation coefficients (r) are also reported throughout the manuscript. The results are reported as median along with interquartile range (IQR).

3. Results

Clinical characteristics, comorbidities and baseline clinical parameters of enrolled patients are reported in Table 1 and Table 2.
Vitamin D serum levels were found significantly lower in COVID-19 patients than in CNT (median 7.9 vs. 16.3 ng/mL, p= 0.001) (see Table 3 for further details). No statistically significant difference was observed between male and female subjects (Table 3).
Among COVID-19 patients, vitamin D sufficiency (>30 ng/mL), insufficiency (between 20 and 30 ng/mL), deficiency (between 10 and 20 ng/mL), and severe deficiency (<10 ng/mL) were observed respectively in 11, 11, 21, and 57% of patients. In CNT, the same vitamin D distribution occurred in 21, 21, 36, and 22% of subjects, respectively (Figure 1).
Basal vitamin D serum levels were significantly lower in patients who died during hospitalization, compared to those who survived (median 3.0 vs. 8.4 ng/mL, p = 0.046) (Table 3). COVID-19 patients died in relation to the severity of the lung involvement and their comorbidities represented concomitant risk factors.
A statistically significant correlation was observed between vitamin D serum levels and PaO2 (r = 0.37, p = 0.03), SO2 (r = 0.37, p = 0.05), PaO2/FiO2 (r =0.41, p = 0.02), while a statistically significant negative correlation was found between vitamin D serum levels and percentage of O2 in Venturi Mask (r = −0.37, p = 0.04) (Figure 2). No correlation was observed between vitamin D serum levels and PaCO2.
Furthermore, we fitted three multiple linear regression models to estimate the associations between 25OHD and PaO2/FiO2, SO2, and PaO2 while adjusting for age, sex, and number of comorbidities. Since the vitamin D levels were not normally distributed, we modelled the PaO2/FiO2 ratio with logarithmic transformation and used the log-transformed 25OHD levels as explanatory variable with age, sex and comorbidities as adjustments. The one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to check the normality assumption of the linear model residuals, and the multiple linear regression results are reported in Table 4.
A statistically significant association between vitamin D serum levels and both PaO2/FiO2 ratio and PaO2 was confirmed. The models show about 17% increase in PaO2/FiO2 every 1% increase of 25OHD, regardless of age, sex, and comorbidities (Kolmogorov-Smirnov: D = 0.131, p = 0.251), as well as for every 1% increase of 25OHD levels, PaO2 increases about 5 mmHg. No statistically significant association was detected between SO2 and 25OHD after adjustments.
A negative association was found between vitamin D serum levels and severity of radiologic pulmonary involvement, as evaluated by CT: in particular, vitamin D was found significantly lower in COVID-19 patients with either multiple lung consolidations (p = 0.0001) or diffuse/severe interstitial lung involvement (ground glass pattern) (p = 0.05) than in those with mild interstitial lung involvement. Figure 3 reports the statistically significant differences among the groups.
In addition, vitamin D serum levels negatively correlated also with D-dimer (r = −0.37, p = 0.04), C-reactive protein (r = −0.38, p = 0.04), and parathyroid hormone (r = −0.36, p = 0.05) (Figure 2), while serum calcium positively correlated with vitamin D levels (r = 0.38, p = 0.04). No correlation was observed between vitamin D serum levels and ferritin, LDH, blood cell count, hemoglobin, creatinine, and transaminases.
Of note, the multiple regression analysis developed to identify possible effects of blood serum parameters (including 25OHD, C-reactive protein, lymphocytes, D-dimer and ferritin as independent variables) on PaO2/FiO2 ratio (dependent variable) showed vitamin D the only independent variable able to significantly interfere with this clinical parameter (regression coefficient 2.50, t-value 2.05, 95% lower 0.05, 95% upper 4.95, p = 0.046).
A negative correlation was also observed between vitamin D serum levels and age of patients in CNT as expected (r = −0.49, p = 0.0009), but this correlation was not observed in COVID-19 patients (p = 0.77).
Finally, lower vitamin D serum levels were found associated with longer global disease duration (r = −0.37, p = 0.05) (Figure 2).
Multiple linear regressions using age, sex, and number of comorbidities (with vitamin D as the dependent variable) did not identify statistically significant effects of the independent variables on 25OHD level in COVID-19 patients.

4. Discussion

Present investigation underlines that serum vitamin D deficiency might influence the severity of lung involvement and the risk of deaths, in elderly COVID-19 patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The results are likely linked to the role played by the biologically active metabolite of vitamin D [1,25(OH)2-D] that as steroid hormone is involved in the regulation of growth and differentiation of various immune cell types [3,5,10].
On this basis, the association between vitamin D deficiency and an increased incidence and higher activity of several autoimmune diseases (i.e., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel diseases, type 1 diabetes) has been already demonstrated by several reports [2,11,12,13,14,15].
On the other hand, low vitamin D levels have been associated with the increased risk of respiratory tract infections and pneumonia, whereas a two-fold increased risk of tuberculosis was observed in patients with vitamin D deficiency, with vitamin D levels predicting the tubercular disease risk in a serum concentration-dependent manner [16,17,18,19].
In addition, vitamin D deficiency was found associated to longer acute respiratory infection course, while a recent meta-analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation could prevent respiratory infections [20,21].
Recently, vitamin D deficiency was associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, in terms of higher risk of disease development, higher disease severity, higher frequency of intensive care unit hospitalization, higher risk of death, thus interfering with the prognosis of COVID-19 [7,8,22,23,24,25,26].
SARS-CoV-2 may induce a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring hospitalization, whose main risk factors, besides vitamin D deficiency, are old age, male sex, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, low ambient temperature, and high geographic latitude [26,27].
In particular, ageing correlates with progressively lower vitamin D serum levels, as known [28,29]. In our study the mean age of enrolled patients was 76 years: however median vitamin D serum levels were 7.9 ng/mL in COVID-19 patients, significantly lower than that of sex- and age-matched control subjects (16.3 ng/mL).
Vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) was also found more frequent in COVID-19 (78% of patients) than in sex- and age-matched controls (57% of subjects).
Even if the comparison of vitamin D serum levels detected into different studies is quite difficult, due to different cohorts of enrolled patients and various comorbidities that may influence the levels itself, as well as different methodologies, disease severity and age, the results of our study are quite similar to those of a recent study reporting vitamin D serum levels < 50 nmol/L (<20 ng/mL) in 61% of hospitalized patients (mean age 76 years) [26]. In our study 57% of COVID-19 patients showed more severe deficiency with values < 10 ng/mL.
The same authors observed a significantly greater prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L) in patients requiring intensive care treatment than in those without (81% of patients) [26]. Similarly, another study reported 25OHD deficiency in 67% of patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 disease, but in 80% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation [22].
A recent systematic review analyzed seven studies on COVID-19 severity, intensive care treatment, and mortality (1368 patients were included) and detected a mean vitamin D level of 22.9 nmol/L (9.16 ng/mL), higher but similar to that of our cohort of patients (7.9 ng/mL) [8). Patients with good prognosis had significantly higher vitamin D levels compared with those with poor prognosis [8]. Additionally, in our cohort of patients, mortality was associated to lower vitamin D serum levels. Globally, these data confirm an important role of vitamin D in COVID-19 outcome.
Among clinical parameters, we included in our study the PaO2/FiO2 ratio that is commonly used for the diagnosis of alveolar injury (transfusion-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome) and for the assessment of pulmonary disease course and therapy. Practically, the ratio PaO2/FiO2 measures the severity of hypoxemia in patients with ARDS and has been included into the consensus definition of ARDS itself [30,31].
A low PaO2/FiO2 ratio was detected as an independent risk factor for death in COVID-19 patients [32]. Our study detected a statistically significant positive correlation between 25OHD serum levels and PaO2/FiO2 values (low vitamin D values were associated to low PaO2/FiO2 ratio). This observation is in line with the results of another study reporting a high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in COVID-19 patients with low PaO2/FiO2 ratio [33].
How vitamin D interferes with COVID-19 progression is not completely understood. The innate immune system represents the first line of defense against viruses depending on constitutive expression of pattern recognition receptors, like toll-like receptors. 1,25(OH)2-D plays an anti-viral role, regulating the inflammatory response by modulating toll-like receptor expression and NK cell function, and suppressing over-expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [34]. 1,25(OH)2-D enhances the defense also by inducing antimicrobial peptide release, like cathelicidin that lead to viral destruction and clearance and facilitates the recruitment of monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells. Therefore, 1,25(OH)2-D may regulate the innate/adaptive responses and may interfere with the maturation of dendritic cells and their ability to present antigen to T-cells, shifting the T cell profile from the pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 subsets to Th2 and Treg subsets, thus inhibiting the pro-inflammatory processes [10].
Besides the immunomodulatory and anti-viral effects, 1,25(OH)2-D modulates the renin–angiotensin system that also plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. ACE2 seems the main host cell receptor that mediates the infection by SARS-CoV-2: the virus attaches to ACE2 through its spike glycoprotein to enter the cell, thus reducing the expression of ACE2 [35,36,37,38,39]. Vitamin D suppresses renin at the transcriptional level and consequently angiotensin expression, and increases ACE2 expression, possibly restoring the physiological concentration of ACE2 downregulated by the virus [40,41,42,43].
In the lung, several alveolar cell types express the ACE2 receptor. These cells play an important role in producing surfactant, able to regulate the alveolar surface tension. SARS-CoV-2 can infect the alveolar cells by ACE2 binding and suppress the production of surfactant. The loss of alveolar cells results in lung damage and respiratory insufficiency due to the loss of pulmonary surfactant [44]. This damage might be prevented by vitamin D, as in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that 1,25(OH)2-D induces type II pneumocyte proliferation and surfactant synthesis in the lungs [45,46,47]. Our clinical data are therefore supported by molecular mechanisms. Vitamin D exerts also vasoprotective effects, while vitamin D deficiency represents a risk factor for endothelial dysfunction [48]. Interestingly, vitamin D is involved in the regulation of the thrombotic pathways, and vitamin D deficiency is associated with a higher risk of thrombotic events [49]. As known, patients with COVID-19 frequently suffer from microthrombotic complications, which may contribute to worse lung disease and death. The main autopsy histological findings report a sequential alveolar damage, mainly characterized by focal capillary microthrombosis [50,51]. This clinical complication may be laboratory investigated by D-dimer dosage [52]. High D-dimer levels are often detected in COVID-19 patients, and are significantly associated with the risk of mortality [53]. Our study confirms a statistically significant negative correlation between 25OHD serum levels and D-dimer values, as recently reported also by another study [54].
Finally, it must be said that hypovitaminosis D has been hypothesized to be the consequence, rather than the cause, of chronic inflammatory diseases, as well as current data are not yet sufficient to demonstrate a definite role for vitamin D in the modulation of adaptive immune system in humans [55,56]. However, it is biologically plausible that calcitriol may exert immunomodulatory effects, also in COVID-19 patients, by regulating both innate and adaptive immunity [10,57], as the lung epithelium was demonstrated to be an important target tissue for calcitriol [45]. Furthermore, in a clinical case-series report, high dose vitamin D supplementation improved clinical recovery in COVID-19 patients, evidenced by decrease in inflammatory biomarker status, lower oxygen requirements and less days of hospitalization [58]. However, a recent study including UK Biobank subjects did not evidence a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of COVID-19 infection [25].
This study has some limitations.
The number of patients analyzed in this retrospective cross-sectional study is small, and included only elderly patients needing hospitalization and oxygen therapy due to severe respiratory failure in SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it did not include either patients with mild disease nor patients needing intensive care treatment or ventilation. Furthermore, due to small number of enrolled patients and large data variability, the sample size was not adequately powered to rule out the variation expected in the main outcome parameters: for this reason the correlation coefficients are relatively small. Therefore, robustly designed randomized clinical trials including a larger number of patients are needed, but are likely to further confirm these preliminary data.
Enrolled patients did not perform ventilation/perfusion lung scan along with contrast enhanced computed tomography to investigate pulmonary microembolism/thrombosis, and this does not permit to surely associate the D-dimer abnormalities with the clinical condition. However, pulmonary embolism has been described in up to 37% of COVID-19 patients by radiological examinations and in 79% of patients after autopsy [59,60].
COVID-19 patients showed several different comorbidities that might interfere with some results of the study, however also sex- and age-matched healthy subjects had similar comorbidities, as reported in Table 1. Of note, the detection of the disease also in younger patients with less comorbidities, further suggests vitamin D deficiency as crucial risk factor at any age. Therefore, vitamin D supplementation is recommended for the prevention and treatment of any age SARS-CoV-2 infection and should be matter of large controlled studies [61,62]. In our cohort, 34% of patients and 68% of controls were supplemented with vitamin D.
Several other studies have also linked low levels of serum vitamin D to SARS-CoV-2 infection [63]. However, our study clearly reports the associations between lung, clinical and laboratory parameters (including 25OHD levels) in elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19, focusing on lung involvement. Accordingly, the mean age of analyzed patients was very high and this did not permit further comparison of vitamin D levels between COVID-19 patients and controls by stratifying different ages.
It is already known that vitamin D serum level is usually low in patients with chronic inflammation or infections (including SARS-CoV-2), but this was previously demonstrated in younger people. This study reports and confirms similar findings also in older COVID-19 patients.

5. Conclusions

Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for infections as well as for insufficient innate immune system reactivity, therefore the winter time testing for serum vitamin D status (lowest levels expected) should be mandatory as part of regular health check status. The test is even more mandatory in patients with chronic diseases, where we expect vitamin D deficiency during all the year and an increased burden of risk factors for further disease severity and even mortality. Deficiency must be treated with vitamin D administration until reaching the optimal range of 40–60 ng/mL during all the year.
In conclusion, this study confirms that vitamin D deficiency is associated with more severe lung involvement, longer disease duration, and risk of death in elderly COVID-19 patients.

Author Contributions

A.S. and E.G. were involved in the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, statistical analysis, basic analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. A.C., S.P., C.P. and E.A. were involved in the acquisition of data, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. M.G., D.F. and V.S. were involved in interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. M.C. was involved in the conception and design of the study, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice, and all patient data were collected during the routine medical visits. Ethical committee approval was obtained.

Informed Consent Statement

All the patients gave written informed consent to manage their clinical data and enter the studies.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available for ethical and privacy reasons, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Sara De Gregorio for her support in picture presentation and Luca Carmisciano for his contribution in statistical analysis. Alberto Sulli, Emanuele Gotelli, Vanessa Smith and Maurizio Cutolo are members of the EULAR Study Group on Neuroendocrine Immunology in Rheumatic Diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

All Authors declare no conflict of interest concerning this manuscript.

References

  1. Cutolo, M.; Pizzorni, C.; Sulli, A. Vitamin D endocrine system involvement in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011, 11, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cutolo, M.; Plebani, M.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Adorini, L.; Tincani, A. Vitamin D endocrine system and the immune response in rheumatic diseases. Vitam. Horm. 2011, 86, 327–351. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Adorini, L.; Penna, G. Control of autoimmune diseases by the vitamin D endocrine system. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 2008, 4, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dall’Ara, F.; Cutolo, M.; Andreoli, L.; Tincani, A.; Paolino, S. Vitamin D and systemic lupus erythematous: A review of immunological and clinical aspects. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2018, 36, 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cutolo, M.; Paolino, S.; Sulli, A.; Smith, V.; Pizzorni, C.; Seriolo, B. Vitamin D, steroid hormones, and autoimmunity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1317, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zittermann, A.; Pilz, S.; Hoffmann, H.; März, W. Vitamin D and airway infections: A European perspective. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2016, 21, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Weir, E.K.; Thenappan, T.; Bhargava, M.; Chen, Y. Does vitamin D deficiency increase the severity of COVID-19? Clin. Med. 2020, 20, e107–e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Munshi, R.; Hussein, M.H.; Toraih, E.A.; Elshazli, R.M.; Jardak, C.; Sultana, N.; Youssef, M.R.; Omar, M.; Attia, A.S.; Fawzy, M.S.; et al. Vitamin D insufficiency as a potential culprit in critical COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Holick, M.; Binkley, N.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.; Hanley, D.; Heaney, R.; Murad, M.H.; Weaver, C.M. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1911–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bilezikian, J.P.; Bikle, D.; Hewison, M.; Lazaretti-Castro, M.; Formenti, A.M.; Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; Nair, N.; Babalyann, V.; Hutchings, N.; et al. Mechanisms in Endocrinology: Vitamin D and COVID-19. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2020, 183, R133–R147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vojinovic, J.; Tincani, A.; Sulli, A.; Soldano, S.; Andreoli, L.; Dall’Ara, F.; Ionescu, R.; Pasalic, K.S.; Balcune, I.; Ferraz-Amaro, I.; et al. European multicentre pilot survey to assess vitamin D status in rheumatoid arthritis patients and early development of a new Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire (D-PRO). Autoimmun. Rev. 2017, 16, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cutolo, M. Further emergent evidence for the vitamin D endocrine system involvement in autoimmune rheumatic disease risk and prognosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Orgaz-Molina, J.; Buendia-Eisman, A.; Arrabal-Polo, M.A.; Ruiz, J.C.; Arias-Santiago, S. Deficiency of serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in psoriatic patients: A case-control study. J. Am. Acad. Derm. 2012, 67, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Trombetta, A.C.; Smith, V.; Gotelli, E.; Ghio, M.; Paolino, S.; Pizzorni, C.; Vanhaecke, A.; Ruaro, B.; Sulli, A.; Cutolo, M. Vitamin D deficiency and clinical correlations in systemic sclerosis patients: A retrospective analysis for possible future developments. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Charoenngam, N.; Holick, M.F. Immunologic Effects of Vitamin D on Human Health and Disease. Nutrients. 2020, 12, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Science, M.; Maguire, J.L.; Russell, M.L.; Smieja, M.; Walter, S.D.; Loeb, M. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in children and adolescents. Clin. Infect Dis. 2013, 57, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Berry, D.J.; Hesketh, K.; Power, C.; Hypponen, E. Vitamin D status has a linear association with seasonal infections and lung function in British adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 106, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Lu, D.; Zhang, J.; Ma, C.; Yue, Y.; Zou, Z.; Yu, C.; Yin, F. Link between community-acquired pneumonia and vitamin D levels in older patients. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2018, 51, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aibana, O.; Huang, C.C.; Aboud, S.; Arnedo-Pena, A.; Becerra, M.C.; Bellido-Blasco, J.B.; Bhosale, R.; Calderon, R.; Chiang, S.; Contreras, C.; et al. Vitamin D status and risk of incident tuberculosis disease: A nested case-control study, systematic review, and individual-participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, e1002907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, M.X.; Koh, J.; Pang, J. Association between micronutrient deficiency and acute respiratory infections in healthy adults: A systematic review of observational studies. Nutr. J. 2019, 18, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Martineau, A.R.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Hooper, R.L.; Greenberg, L.; Aloia, J.F.; Bergman, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Esposito, S.; Ganmaa, D.; Ginde, A.A.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 2017, 356, i6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Im, J.H.; Je, Y.S.; Baek, J.; Chung, M.H.; Kwon, H.Y.; Lee, J.S. Nutritional status of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int. J. Infect Dis. 2020, 100, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Giustina, A.; Formenti, A.M. Preventing a covid-19 pandemic Can high prevalence of severe hypovitaminosis D play a role in the high impact of Covid infection in Italy? BMJ 2020, 368, m810. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchell, F. Vitamin-D and COVID-19: Do deficient risk a poorer outcome? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hastie, C.E.; Mackay, D.F.; Ho, F.; Celis-Morales, C.A.; Katikireddi, S.V.; Niedzwiedz, C.L.; Jani, B.D.; Welsh, P.; Mair, F.S.; Gray, S.R.; et al. Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank Diabetes. Metab. Syndr. 2020, 14, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Panagiotou, G.; Tee, S.A.; Ihsan, Y.; Athar, W.; Marchitelli, G.; Kelly, D.; Boot, C.S.; Stock, N.; Macfarlane, J.; Martineau, A.R.; et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are associated with greater disease severity. Clin. Endocrinol. 2020, 93, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rhodes, J.M.; Subramanian, S.; Laird, E.; Griffin, G.; Kenny, R.A. Perspective: Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 severity-plausibly linked by latitude, ethnicity, impacts on cytokines, ACE2 and thrombosis. J. Intern. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kühn, J.; Trotz, P.; Stangl, G.I. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and evidence for disease prevention in the older population. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2018, 51, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hill, T.R.; Granic, A.; Davies, K.; Collerton, J.; Martin-Ruiz, C.; Siervo, M.; Mathers, J.C.; Adamson, A.J.; Francis, R.M.; Pearce, S.H.; et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and its determinants in the very old: The Newcastle 85+ Study. Osteoporos. Int. 2016, 27, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri, V.M.; Rubenfeld, G.D.; Thompson, B.T.; Ferguson, N.D.; Caldwell, E.; Fan, E.; Camporota, L.; Slutsky, A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012, 307, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hardie, J.A.; Vollmer, W.M.; Buist SAEllingsen, I.; Mørkve, O. Reference values for arterial blood gases in the elderly. Chest. 2004, 125, 2053–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Hu, C.; Chen, C.; Wang, D.; Peng, Z. Clinical Course of 195 Critically ILL COVID-19 Patients, A Retrospective Multi-Center Study. Shock 2020, 54, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Carpagnano, G.E.; Di Lecce, V.; Quaranta, V.N.; Zito, A.; Buonamico, E.; Capozza, E.; Palumbo, A.; Di Gioia, G.; Valerio, V.N.; Resta, O. Vitamin D deficiency as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beard, J.A.; Bearden, A.; Striker, R. Vitamin D and the anti-viral state. J. Clin. Virol. 2011, 50, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Malek Mahdavi, A. A brief review of interplay between vitamin D and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: Implications for a potential treatment for COVID-19. Rev. Med. Virol. 2020, 30, e2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, X.; Chen, P.; Wang, J.; Feng, J.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Zhong, W.; Hao, P. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, Z.J. Structure analysis of the receptor binding of 2019-nCoV. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 525, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kuba, K.; Imai, Y.; Rao, S.; Gao, H.; Guo, F.; Guan, B.; Huan, Y.; Yang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, W.; et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 875–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, Y.C. Molecular mechanism of vitamin D in the cardiovascular system. J. Investig. Med. 2011, 59, 868–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Machado, C.D.S.; Ferro Aissa, A.; Ribeiro, D.L.; Antunes, L.M.G. Vitamin D supplementation alters the expression of genes associated with hypertension and did not induce DNA damage in rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 2019, 82, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bourgonje, A.R.; Abdulle, A.E.; Timens, W.; Hillebrands, J.L.; Navis, G.J.; Gordijn, S.J.; Bolling, M.C.; Dijkstra, G.; Voors, A.A.; Osterhaus, A.D.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Pathol. 2020, 251, 228–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kong, J.; Zhu, X.; Shi, Y.; Liu, T.; Chen, Y.; Bhan, I.; Zhao, Q.; Thadhani, R.; Li, Y.C. VDR attenuates acute lung injury by blocking Ang-2-Tie-2 pathway and renin-angiotensin system. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 2116–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mason, R.J. Thoughts on the alveolar phase of COVID-19. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2020, 31, L115–L120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rehan, V.K.; Torday, J.S.; Peleg, S.; Gennaro, L.; Vouros, P.; Padbury, J.; Rao, D.S.; Reddy, G.S. 1Alpha,25-dihydroxy-3-epi-vitamin D3, a natural metabolite of 1alpha,25dihydroxy vitamin D3: Production and biological activity studies in pulmonary alveolar type II cells. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2002, 76, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Phokela, S.S.; Peleg, S.; Moya, F.R.; Alcorn, J.L. Regulation of human pulmonary surfactant protein gene expression by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2005, 289, L617–L626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, L.; Wilson, R.; Bennett, E.; Zosky, G.R. Identification of vitamin D sensitive pathways during lung development. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Kim, D.H.; Meza, C.A.; Clarke, H.; Kim, J.S.; Hickner, R.C. Vitamin D and Endothelial Function. Nutrients 2020, 12, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mohammad, S.; Mishra, A.; Ashraf, M.Z. Emerging role of vitamin D and its associated molecules in pathways related to pathogenesis of thrombosis. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kommoss, F.K.F.; Schwab, C.; Tavernar, L.; Schreck, J.; Wagner, W.L.; Merle, U.; Jonigk, D.; Schirmacher, P.; Longerich, T. The Pathology of Severe COVID-19-Related Lung Damage. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2020, 117, 500–506. [Google Scholar]
  51. McGonagle, D.; O’Donnell, J.S.; Sharif, K.; Emery, P.; Bridgewood, C. Immune mechanisms of pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy in COVID-19 pneumonia. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020, 2, e437–e445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adam, S.S.; Key, N.S.; Greenberg, C.S. D-dimer antigen: Current concepts and future prospects. Blood 2009, 113, 2878–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Sakka, M.; Connors, J.M.; Hékimian, G.; Martin-Toutain, I.; Crichi, B.; Colmegna, I.; Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Farge, D.; Frere, C. Association between D-Dimer levels and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and pooled analysis. J. Med. Vasc. 2020, 45, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Baktash, V.; Hosack, T.; Patel, N.; Shah, S.; Kandiah, P.; Van den Abbeele, K.; Mandal, A.K.J.; Missouris, C.G. Vitamin D status and outcomes for hospitalised older patients with COVID-19. Postgrad Med. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cutolo, M.; Paolino, S.; Smith, V. Evidences for a protective role of vitamin D in COVID-19. RMD Open. 2020, 6, e001454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sassi, F.; Tamone, C.; D’Amelio, P. Vitamin D: Nutrient, hormone, and immunomodulator. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Waldron, J.L.; Ashby, H.L.; Cornes, M.P.; Bechervaise, J.; Razavi, C.; Thomas, O.L.; Chugh, S.; Deshpande, S.; Ford, C.; Gama, R. Vitamin D: A negative acute phase reactant. J. Clin. Pathol. 2013, 66, 620–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ohaegbulam, K.C.; Swalih, M.; Patel, P.; Smith, M.A.; Perrin, R. Vitamin D Supplementation in COVID-19 Patients: A Clinical Case Series. Am. J Ther. 2020, 27, e485–e490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kaminetzky, M.; Moore, W.; Fansiwala, K.; Babb, J.S.; Kaminetzky, D.; HorwitzL, I.; McGuinness, G.; Knoll, A.; Ko, J.P. Pulmonary Embolism on CTPA in COVID-19 Patients. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging. 2020, 2, e200308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grosse, C.; Grosse, A.; Salzer, H.J.F.; Dünser, M.W.; Motz, R.; Langer, R. Analysis of cardiopulmonary findings in COVID-19 fatalities: High incidence of pulmonary artery thrombi and acute suppurative bronchopneumonia. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2020, 49, 107263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grant, W.B.; Lahore, H.; McDonnell, S.L.; Baggerly, C.A.; French, C.B.; Aliano, J.L.; Bhattoa, H.P. Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients 2020, 12, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Cianferotti, L.; Bertoldo, F.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Bruyere, O.; Cooper, C.; Cutolo, M.; Kanis, J.A.; Kaufman, J.M.; Reginster, J.Y.; Rizzoli, R.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and management of major chronic diseases not related to mineral homeostasis in adults: Research for evidence and a scientific statement from the European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Endocrine 2017, 56, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Pereira, M.; Dantas Damascena, A.; Galvão Azevedo, L.M.; de Almeida Oliveira, T.; da Mota Santana, J. Vitamin D deficiency aggravates COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 13 00717 g001a 550Nutrients 13 00717 g001b 550
Figure 1. Observed frequencies of 25OH-vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients and control subjects (CNT).
Figure 1. Observed frequencies of 25OH-vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients and control subjects (CNT).
Nutrients 13 00717 g001aNutrients 13 00717 g001b
Nutrients 13 00717 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlations between 25OH-vitamin D serum levels and clinical parameters in COVID-19 patients.
Figure 2. Correlations between 25OH-vitamin D serum levels and clinical parameters in COVID-19 patients.
Nutrients 13 00717 g002
Nutrients 13 00717 g003 550
Figure 3. 25OH-vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients with different radiological lung involvement. MI = localized/mild interstitial (11 patients), DI = diffuse/severe interstitial (8 patients), FC = focal consolidation (eight patients), MC = multiple consolidations (21 patients), Mixed = mixed abnormalities (13 patients), Normal = absence of radiological involvement (four patients). Data are given as 5th, 10th, 50th (median), 90th, and 95th percentiles. Only statistically significant differences between groups are reported.
Figure 3. 25OH-vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients with different radiological lung involvement. MI = localized/mild interstitial (11 patients), DI = diffuse/severe interstitial (8 patients), FC = focal consolidation (eight patients), MC = multiple consolidations (21 patients), Mixed = mixed abnormalities (13 patients), Normal = absence of radiological involvement (four patients). Data are given as 5th, 10th, 50th (median), 90th, and 95th percentiles. Only statistically significant differences between groups are reported.
Nutrients 13 00717 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and comorbidities of enrolled subjects. p = statistical significance.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and comorbidities of enrolled subjects. p = statistical significance.
COVID-19CONTROLSp
Age (years, mean ± SD)76 ± 1376 ± 130.814
Disease duration (days, mean ± SD)13.1 ± 13--
Male/Female30/3530/35-
Body mass index (kg/m2)26.325.40.634
Ethnicity: Caucasian65/6565/650.931
Died during hospitalization10/65--
Recovery time (days, mean ± SD)33 ± 14--
Smoking status4/654/650.891
Arterial hypertension35/65 (54%)36/65 (55%)0.281
Previous cardiac/cerebral ischemic vasculopathy14/65 (21%)6/65 (11%)0.357
Neoplasms11/65 (16%)5/65 (8%)0.091
Recent hip or vertebral fracture12/65 (18%)11/65 (17%)0.916
Diabetes 10/65 (15%)9/65 (14%)0.737
Chronic atrial fibrillation11/65 (17%)11/65 (17%)0.492
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8/65(12%)3/65 (3%)0.213
Chronic kidney disease5/65 (8%)4/65 (6%)0.652
Dysthyroidism4/65 (6%)5/65 (8%)0.458
Colic diverticulosis5/65 (8%)2/65 (3%)0.223
Chronic arthritis (rheumatoid or psoriatic)2/65 (3%)7/65 (11%)0.049
Epilepsy2/65 (3%)4/65 (6%)0.296
Allergic asthma1/65 (2%)2/65 (3%)0.414
Liver cirrhosis1/65 (2%)3/65 (5%)0.243
Hepatitis B infection1/65 (2%)1/65 (2%)0.892
No comorbidities7/65 (11%)10/65 (15%)0.490
One comorbidity17/65 (26%)19/65 (29%)0.749
Two comorbidities24/65 (37%)22/65 (34%)0.647
Three comorbidities13/65 (20%)11/65 (17)0.547
Four or more comorbidities4/65 (6%)3/65 (5%)0.616
Vitamin D supplementation22/65 (34%)44/65 (68%)0.015
Table
Table 2. Baseline clinical parameters of COVID-19 patients. Values are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR).
Table 2. Baseline clinical parameters of COVID-19 patients. Values are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR).
COVID-19Normal Range
SO2 (%)92 (4)95–99
PaO2 (mmHg)69 (20)83–108
PaCO2 (mmHg)37 (7)35–48
FiO2 (%)31 (36)21
PaO2/FiO2211 (199)>300
D-dimer (mcg/L)1078 (1071)0–500
C-reactive protein (mg/L)39 (78)0–5
Ferritin (mcg/L)562 (746)30–400
LDH—lactate dehydrogenase (UI/L)259 (117)135–225
White blood cells (×109/L)5.9 (4.2)4.5–9.8
Lymphocytes (×109/L)0.9 (0.6)1.1–4.8
Haemoglobin (g/L)11.3 (2.9)12–17.5
Platelets (×109/L)218 (166)130–430
GOT—glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (UI/L)34 (21)0–40
GPT—glutamic-pyruvate transaminase (UI/L)29 (21)0–40
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.9 (0.4)0.6–1.0
Calcium (mg/dL)8.7 (0.5)8.5–11.0
Phosphorus (mg/dL)3.2 (1.1)2.5–4.5
PTH—parathyroid hormone (ng/L)51 (40)6.5–36.8
Table
Table 3. Vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients and control subjects (CNT). 25OH-vitamin D values (ng/mL) are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR).
Table 3. Vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients and control subjects (CNT). 25OH-vitamin D values (ng/mL) are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR).
COVID-19CNTStatistical Significance
All subjects7.9 (15)16.3 (19)p = 0.001
Died/Survived3.0 (8)/8.4 (18)-p = 0.046
Male7.0 (12) *13.6 (20) *p = 0.021
Female9.3 (20) *18.3 (19) *p = 0.0049
* male vs. female p = n.s.
Table
Table 4. Multiple linear regression results showing the statistically significant associations between vitamin D serum levels (25OHD) and both PaO2/FiO2 ratio and PaO2.
Table 4. Multiple linear regression results showing the statistically significant associations between vitamin D serum levels (25OHD) and both PaO2/FiO2 ratio and PaO2.
OutcomePredictorsBeta (95% CI)p Value
PaO2/FiO2 (log)25OHD (ng/mL) (log)0.17 (0.01, 0.33)0.033
Sex (female)−0.02 (−0.31, 0.27)0.889
Age (years)−0.00 (−0.01, 0.01)0.812
Comorbidities−0.07 (−0.21, 0.06)0.272
SO2 (%)25OHD (ng/mL) (log)0.97 (−0.66, 2.60)0.240
Sex (female)−2.38 (−5.37, 0.61)0.116
Age (years)0.02 (−0.09, 0.13)0.713
Comorbidities−1.08 (−2.48, 0.31)0.126
PaO2 (mmHg)25OHD (ng/mL) (log)5.18 (0.83, 9.52)0.021
Sex (female)−10.3 (−18.2, −2.3)0.012
Age (years)−0.03 (−0.33, 0.27)0.823
Comorbidities−1.37 (−5.06, 2.32)0.459
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sulli, A.; Gotelli, E.; Casabella, A.; Paolino, S.; Pizzorni, C.; Alessandri, E.; Grosso, M.; Ferone, D.; Smith, V.; Cutolo, M. Vitamin D and Lung Outcomes in Elderly COVID-19 Patients. Nutrients 2021, 13, 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030717

AMA Style

Sulli A, Gotelli E, Casabella A, Paolino S, Pizzorni C, Alessandri E, Grosso M, Ferone D, Smith V, Cutolo M. Vitamin D and Lung Outcomes in Elderly COVID-19 Patients. Nutrients. 2021; 13(3):717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sulli, Alberto, Emanuele Gotelli, Andrea Casabella, Sabrina Paolino, Carmen Pizzorni, Elisa Alessandri, Marco Grosso, Diego Ferone, Vanessa Smith, and Maurizio Cutolo. 2021. "Vitamin D and Lung Outcomes in Elderly COVID-19 Patients" Nutrients 13, no. 3: 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030717

APA Style

Sulli, A., Gotelli, E., Casabella, A., Paolino, S., Pizzorni, C., Alessandri, E., Grosso, M., Ferone, D., Smith, V., & Cutolo, M. (2021). Vitamin D and Lung Outcomes in Elderly COVID-19 Patients. Nutrients, 13(3), 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030717

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop