Next Article in Journal
Nut Consumption Is Associated with Cognitive Status in Southern Italian Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Research Progress on the Degradation of Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs) by Bifidobacteria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Validation of a Smartphone Application for Monitoring Circadian Appetite: A Randomized Crossover Trial in Free-Living and Controlled Settings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Food Security, and Nativity Among Adults: Associations from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2020

by
Aikaterini Stamou
and
Karen R. Flórez
*
Environmental, Occupational and Geospatial Sciences Department, Graduate School of Public Health and Heath Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY 10017, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(3), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030520
Submission received: 20 December 2024 / Revised: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 24 January 2025 / Published: 30 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Surveys and Assessment of Unhealthy Eating Behaviors)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Immigrant populations face unique dietary challenges influenced by food security and acculturation, particularly regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). This study examines the interplay of nativity and food security on SSB consumption patterns. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2020 (N = 23,331) were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. SSB consumption was assessed through 24 h dietary recalls. Food security was categorized as high/marginal or low/very low, and nativity as U.S.-born or foreign-born. Stratified regression models by sex evaluated associations between nativity, food security, and SSB consumption. Results: U.S.-born adults with low food security had the highest sugar intake (men: β = 27.5, 95% CI [14.8, 40.3]; women: β = 30.4, 95% CI [11.0, 49.7]) and SSB consumption (men: β = 14.7, 95% CI [11.2, 18.3]; women: β = 23.6, 95% CI [15.2, 31.9]). Conclusions: The findings highlight associations that suggest the importance of culturally tailored interventions targeting vulnerable groups to address disparities in SSB consumption influenced by food security and nativity.
Keywords: acculturation; food insecurity; ultra-processed foods; public health nutrition; beverage consumption patterns acculturation; food insecurity; ultra-processed foods; public health nutrition; beverage consumption patterns

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stamou, A.; Flórez, K.R. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Food Security, and Nativity Among Adults: Associations from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2020. Nutrients 2025, 17, 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030520

AMA Style

Stamou A, Flórez KR. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Food Security, and Nativity Among Adults: Associations from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2020. Nutrients. 2025; 17(3):520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stamou, Aikaterini, and Karen R. Flórez. 2025. "Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Food Security, and Nativity Among Adults: Associations from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2020" Nutrients 17, no. 3: 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030520

APA Style

Stamou, A., & Flórez, K. R. (2025). Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Food Security, and Nativity Among Adults: Associations from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2020. Nutrients, 17(3), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop