Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of Electrical Properties of Sol–Gel Indium–Tin–Oxide Films by Microwave Irradiation and Plasma Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Design, Analysis and Experiment of a Bridge-Type Piezoelectric Actuator for Infrared Image Stabilization
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Analysis on Active Heat Dissipation Design with Embedded Flow Channels for Flexible Electronic Devices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Rotary Ultrasonic Motor with Double-Sided Staggered Teeth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A High-Resolution Electric Current Sensor Employing a Piezoelectric Drum Transducer

School of Information Engineering, Baise University, Baise 533000, China
Micromachines 2021, 12(10), 1166; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12101166
Submission received: 12 August 2021 / Revised: 25 September 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 28 September 2021

Abstract

:
A high-resolution sensor using a piezoelectric drum transducer is proposed for power frequency current sensing (50 Hz or 60 Hz). The utilization of the magnetic circuit helps to enhance the response to the electric currents in the power cords. The high sensitivity of the sensor originates from the superposition of the Ampere forces and the amplified piezoelectric effect of the drum transducer. The feasibility of the sensor was verified by experiments. The device exhibits a broad 3 dB bandwidth of 67.4 Hz without an additional magnetic field bias. The average sensitivity is 31.34 mV/A with a high linearity of 0.49%, and the resolution of the sensor attains 0.02 A. The resolution is much higher than that of the previous piezoelectric heterostructure for two-wire power-cords. Error analysis shows that the uncertainty reaches 0.01865 mV at the current of 2.5 A. Meanwhile, the device can generate a load power of 447.9 nW with an optimal load resistance of 55 KΩ at 10A (f = 50 Hz) in energy harvesting experiments. The features of high sensitivity, excellent linearity, high resolution, low costs, and convenient installation demonstrate the application prospect of the proposed device for measuring power frequency currents in electric power grids.

1. Introduction

Electricity measurement is of great importance for the safety protection, reliability, and early warning of the electrical equipment in electric power grids. The traditional current sensors, such as Rogowski coils [1], Hall devices [2], and current transformers [3], are used for electricity measurement, but there are some disadvantages. For example, Rogowski coils are not suited for small current measurements. Hall devices put forward high requirements for signal conditioners. Current transformers have the shortcoming of signal distortion due to the magnetic saturation. For the measurement of the power frequency (e.g., 50 Hz in China and 60 Hz in North America) currents, a current sensor was developed to use the combination of a piezoelectric cantilever beam and NdFeB magnets [4], which resonates at 60 Hz in operation. However, it is hard to maintain the resonance due to the nonlinear behavior of the device, and a non-resonant device might be preferred in realistic current sensing.
In recent years, magnetoelectric (ME) mechanisms have been reported for energy harvesting [5,6,7,8,9] and current sensing [10,11,12]. ME structures can be used as electric current sensors by coupling the magnetic field generated by the alternating currents [13,14,15,16,17,18]. An ME device with a tunable bias magnetic circuit was presented [13], which exhibits an excellent linearity for 50 Hz current measurement. A ring-type ME structure operating in vortex magnetic field of the currents was developed [14]. The sensor shows a non-resonant sensitivity of ~12.6 mV/A over the frequency range of 1 Hz–30 kHz. A new ME structure was put forward for alternating current sensing [15]. A current sensitivity of 1.03 mV/mA is attained when the input current ranges from 15 mA to 2.1 A. A gradient-type ME current sensor is proposed, which operates in magnetic field gradient detection [16], and a sensitivity of 0.65–12.55 mV/A is attained in a wide frequency range of 10 Hz–170 kHz. ME cantilever beams have also attracted attention due to their high resonant sensitivities. A FeCuNbSiB/Ni/PZT beam was fabricated for coupling the magnetic field around a current-carrying wire with a strong zero-biased response [17]. The resonant sensitivity reaches ~330 mV/A for measuring 50 Hz currents. A current sensor consisting of a FIEA beam, a PZT8 plate, and a permalloy yoke was proposed [18]. The permalloy yoke concentrates the vortex magnetic field of the electric wire to the FIEA beam, which improves the sensitivity of the device. The sensor exhibits a high resonant sensitivity of 300.5 mV/A with a separating distance of 6 mm. However, most of the ME current sensors require DC bias magnetic fields, as the ME effect is strongly dependent on the bias. Furthermore, the presence of the bias magnetic field will increase the volume of the device, which may render its applications impractical.
To measuring 50 Hz or 60 Hz currents in electric power grids, a structure without magnetic field bias might be preferred. A silicon-based piezoelectric current sensing device without a DC magnetic field bias was developed [19]. The device couples the alternating magnetic field of the current-carrying wire and vibrates at the frequency of the current. Recently, current sensors based on piezoelectric cymbal structures have been explored [20,21]. The resolution is 0.05 A [20] and 0.04 A [21] for a single wire and a two-wire power cord, respectively. To improve the resolution, a current sensor using a piezoelectric drum transducer is designed in this paper. The high non-resonant sensitivity results from the superstition of the Ampere forces and the large effective piezoelectric coefficient of the drum transducer. A prototype was fabricated and tested. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed device with high sensitivity and resolution for 50 Hz or 60 Hz current sensing.

2. Design and Analysis

Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the proposed current sensor. The sensor is composed of a magnetic circuit, a piezoelectric drum transducer, and a mass load. The magnetic circuit consists of four magnets and two magnetic yokes, and the magnetic poles are shown in Figure 1. The drum transducer is made up of a steel ring sandwiched between two composite disks, and the composite disk is constructed from a piezoelectric disk bonded on a brass plate. The magnetic circuit produces magnetic flux density on the conductors of the power cord. When the power cord is energized, the Ampere forces (in 3-direction) on the conductors are superimposed based on Ampere’s force law, as shown in Figure 2. An enhanced reacting force is then induced on a magnetic circuit, and a voltage proportional to the electric current is produced due to the piezoelectric effect of the piezoelectric disks.
As illustrated in Figure 2, the vertical Ampere forces on the two current-carrying conductors (conductor a and conductor b) can be calculated by
F a = J 0 s i n ( ω t + ψ ) V 1 B 1 d V  
F b = J 0 s i n ( ω t + ψ ) V 2 B 1 d V  
where J0, ω, and ψ respectively denote the current density, angular frequency, and phase angle, J 0 = I 0 / ( π r c 2 ) , I0 is the amplitude of the current, rc is the radius of each conductor, V1 and V2 are the considered volumes of the conductor a and conductor b, respectively, and B1 is the magnetic flux density in 1-direction. The vertical force on the power cord can be expressed as
F 3 = F a + F b = J 0 s i n ( ω t + ψ ) ( B m a B m b )   = J 0 B l s i n ( ω t + ψ )
where Bma and Bmb are the integrals of B1 over the volume V1 and V2, respectively.
The reaction force of F3 (Fr) acts on the magnetic circuit, and the induced electric field (in 3-direction) can be expressed as
E 3 = d 33 e F 0 π r p 2 ε 0 ( ε 33 T 1 ) = d 33 e B l J 0 ε e π r p 2  
where d 33 e is the effective piezoelectric coefficient of the drum transducer, which is dependent on the geometry of the drum transducer [22], F0 is the amplitude of Fr, rp is the radius of the piezoelectric disk, ε0 is the permittivity of vacuum, ε0 = 8.85 × 1012 F/m, and ε 33 T is the relative permittivity. The induced voltage in the application of Fr is
V 3 = E 3 t p = d 33 e B l J 0 t p ε e π r p 2  
The sensitivity of the piezoelectric heterostructure S is obtained as
S = V 3 I 0 = d 33 e B l t p ε e ( π r p r c ) 2  
It is clear that the sensitivity S is proportional to d 33 e . The use of the piezoelectric drum transducer with a high effective piezoelectric coefficient can potentially improve the sensitivity of the proposed device. For energy harvesting applications, the output power across the external resistive load RL can be expressed as
P = V L 2 R L = ( ω C V 3 ) 2 R L 2 [ 1 + ( ω C R L ) 2 ]  
where RL is the load voltage and C is the capacitance of the piezoelectric disks. The impedance of the piezoelectric drum transducer RS depends on the angular frequency ω and the capacitance C, and RS = 1/(ωC) [23]. The maximal power can be found at RL = RS, which is given by
P m a x = π f C 2 ( d 33 e B l J 0 t p ε e π r p 2 ) 2  
It can be seen from Equation (8) that Pmax is proportional to the square of Bl. Pmax can be improved using the magnetic circuit shown in Figure 1, which improves Bl due to the specific arrangement of the magnets.

3. Results and Discussion

A prototype was fabricated according to Figure 1 to study the feasibility of the proposed piezoelectric heterostructure. The material of the piezoelectric disks is PZT5H. The radius and the thickness of each piezoelectric disk are 7.5 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively. The brass disk (with a radius of 10mm and a thickness of 0.2 mm) and the piezoelectric disk are bonded using insulate epoxy adhesive, and are cured under load.
The frequency-voltage response of the prototype was investigated. Figure 3 shows the induced voltage versus the frequency at 1 A. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the induced voltage attains 187.6 mV at the resonant frequency of fr = 556.2 Hz in the given frequency range (50 Hz–770 Hz). The 3 dB bandwidth Δf of the device is 67.4 Hz. As the sensor operates at the power frequency (50 Hz or 60 Hz), the broad 3 dB bandwidth might be beneficial for the improvement of the sensitivity.
Figure 4 shows the experimental set-up of the current sensing experiments. A current generator is used to generate electric currents in the power cord. The power cord passes through the magnetic circuit. The magnetic circuit experiences an enhanced force when the power cord is energized, which induces an output voltage of the piezoelectric drum transducer. The output voltages of the sensor are monitored using a lock-in amplifier. Figure 5 plots the induced voltage versus the applied electric current at the power frequency of 50 Hz. A good linear response is observed in Figure 5. The voltage varies from 32.29 mV to 345.68 mV when the electric current increases from 1 A to 11 A. The average sensitivity reaches 31.34 mV/A due to the high effective piezoelectric coefficient of the drum transducer. The fitting curve is obtained using the least squares method (with a slope of 31.226 and an intercept of 2.6873), which is given by
f ( I ) = 31.226 I + 2.6873  
The corresponding correlation coefficient is 0.99995853. The linearity is analyzed based on the fitting curve and the experimental data, which is calculated by δ = ( Δ V m a x / Y ) × 100 % . Here, ΔVmax denotes the maximum deviation, and Y is the full scale output. Using the data in Figure 5, a high linearity of 0.49% is obtained, which is very favorable to 50Hz or 60Hz current sensing in electric power grids.
Figure 6 plots the induced voltage versus time at 2.5 A (the number of the measured voltages is 240). The inset of Figure 6 shows the histogram of the induced voltages. The standard deviation is calculated by
σ = i = 1 n ν i 2 n 1  
where ν i is residual error, ν i = V i V - , and V ¯ is the average value of the voltages. Using the sample points (n = 240), V ¯ and σ are calculated to be 80.0038 mV and 0.07224 mV, respectively. Normal distribution can be utilized to analyze the sample points based on the histogram. The confidence interval with a confidence level of 99.99% can be expressed as
S = [ V - ε , V - + ε ]  
where ε = 4 σ / n . The uncertainty of the sensor is given by
ξ = ± ε  
According to the measured voltages shown in Figure 6, the confidence interval is obtained to be [79.98515 mV, 80.02245 mV] for a 99.99% confidence level, and the uncertainty of the sensor reaches 0.01865 mV.
Figure 7 shows the resolution of the current sensor to small current variation (ΔI = 0.02 A) at the frequency of 50 Hz. From Figure 7, an obvious step-change of the induced voltage was observed by adjusting the amplitude of the current within 180 s. A current change as small as 0.02 A is clearly distinguished. It is estimated that this resolution could be further improved by adopting the magnets with a higher remnant flux density and the piezoelectric material with higher piezoelectric coefficient (e.g., PMN-PT). The proposed sensor possesses the characteristics of high sensitivity, high linearity, high resolution, and low costs. Furthermore, the sensor operates without the requirement to wholly encircle the power cord. These features facilitate the current sensing of the proposed device in realistic applications.
The proposed device can be used to harvest magnetic field energy from the power cord. A resistance box was connected to the output of the device. By changing the load resistance, the load voltage increases with the load resistance. The experimental powers were obtained based on the measured load voltages and the corresponding load resistances. Figure 8a plots the experimental output power as a function of the load resistance at the current of 10 A (f = 50 Hz). It can be seen from Figure 8a that the power does not always increase with the resistance. The power reaches a maximum value of 447.9 nW across the resistance of 55 KΩ. Figure 8b shows maximal power versus the electric current at the frequency of 50 Hz. The maximal powers are calculated according to the optimal load resistances and the corresponding load voltages. It can be seen from Figure 8b that the power exhibits an approximate quadratic increase. The power increases from 4.65 nW to 539.8 nW when the current is increased from 1 A to 11 A. It should be noted that the electrical field energy harvested by the device is ignored as the proposed piezoelectric heterostructure is intended for low-voltage applications (e.g., 220 V).

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a self-powered electric current sensor based on a piezoelectric drum transducer is presented. The superposition of the Ampere forces on the conductors of the power cord enhances the response of the sensor to the electric current, which improves the sensitivity of the device. Some conclusions to this study are summarized as follows. (1) The induced voltage of the sensor has a highly linear relationship with the input current, and a high linearity of 0.49% is obtained with an average sensitivity of 31.34 mV/A. (2) The resolution of the sensor was experimental investigated and a high resolution of 0.02 A is attained at the power frequency of 50 Hz, indicating that a step current change as small as 0.02 A can be distinguished by the proposed sensor. (3) The feasibility of the device for harvesting magnetic field energy from two-wire power cords was verified. The prototype generates a load power of 447.9 nW with a matching load resistance of 55 KΩ at a current of 10 A.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61761001).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yi, L.; Lin, F.; Qin, Z.; Zhong, H. Design and construction of a Rogowski coil for measuring wide pulsed current. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cataliotti, A.; Di Cara, D.; Emanuel, A.E.; Nuccio, S. Improvement of Hall effect current transducer metrological performances in the presence of harmonic distortion. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2010, 59, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ziegler, S.; Woodward, R.C.; Iu, H.C.; Borle, L.J. Current sensing techniques: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2009, 9, 354–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Leland, E.S.; Wright, P.K.; White, R.M. A MEMS AC current sensor for residential and commercial electricity end-use monitoring. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2009, 19, 094018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhu, Y.; Zu, J.W. A magnetoelectric generator for energy harvesting from the vibration of magnetic levitation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2012, 48, 3344–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bai, X.; Wen, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, P.; Qiu, J.; Zhu, Y. A magnetoelectric energy harvester with the magnetic coupling to enhance the output performance. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 07A938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, M.; Wen, Y.; Li, P.; Yang, J. A resonant frequency self-tunable rotation energy harvester based on magnetoelectric transducer. Sens. Actuators A 2013, 194, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dai, Z. An vibration energy harvester with broadband and frequency-doubling characteristics based on rotary pendulums. Sens. Actuators A. 2016, 241, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, W.; Qu, C. A magnetically levitated magnetoelectric vibration generator using a Halbach array. Sens. Actuators A 2020, 315, 112301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.; Li, P.; Wen, Y.; He, W.; Yang, A.; Lu, C.; Qiu, J.; Wen, J.; Yang, J.; Zhu, Y.; et al. High-resolution current sensor utilizing nanocrystalline alloy and magnetoelectric laminate composite. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2012, 83, 115001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Li, P.; Wen, Y.; He, W.; Yang, A.; Lu, C. Packaged current-sensing device with self-biased magnetoelectric laminate for low frequency weak-current detection. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 095028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, S.; Leung, C.M.; Kuang, W.; Or, S.W.; Ho, S.L. Concurrent operational modes and enhanced current sensitivity in heterostructure of magnetoelectric ring and piezoelectric transformer. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 17C733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhan, S.; Tong, Y.; Deng, S.; Xue, H.; Yang, S.; Lu, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, X. Magnetoelectric sensor with miniature universal tunable bias magnetic circuit. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 032903. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leung, C.M.; Or, S.W.; Zhang, S.; Ho, S.L. Ring-type electric current sensor based on ring-shaped magnetoelectric laminate of epoxy-bonded Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.92 short-fiber/NdFeB magnet magnetostrictive composite and Pb (Zr, Ti) O3 piezoelectric ceramic. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 09D918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yu, X.; Lou, G.; Chen, H.; Wen, C.; Lu, S. A slice-type magnetoelectric laminated current sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 5839–5850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, M.; Or, S.W. Gradient-type magnetoelectric current sensor with strong multisource noise suppression. Sensors 2018, 18, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lu, C.; Li, P.; Wen, Y.; Yang, A.; Yang, C.; Wang, D.; He, W.; Zhang, J. Zero-biased magnetoelectric composite Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9/Ni/Pb (Zr1-x, Tix)O3 for current sensing. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 589, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, W.; Zhang, J.; Qu, C.; Wu, J.; Peng, J. A passive electric current sensor based on ferromagnetic invariant elastic alloy, piezoelectric ceramic, and permalloy yoke. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2016, 52, 4001504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olszewski, O.Z.; Houlihan, R.; O’Keeffe, R.; O’Neill, M.; Waldron, F.; Mathewson, A.; Jackson, N. A MEMS silicon-based piezoelectric AC current sensor. Procedia Eng. 2014, 87, 1457–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. He, W.; Lu, Y.; Qu, C.; Peng, J. A non-invasive electric current sensor employing a modified shear-mode cymbal transducer. Sens. Actuators A 2016, 241, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, W.; Yang, A. A shear-mode piezoelectric heterostructure for electric current sensing in electric power grids. Micromachines. 2019, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Min, Z.; Or, S.W.; Chan, H.L.W. Giant resonance frequency tunable magnetoelectric effect in a device of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 drum transducer, NdFeB magnet, and Fe-core solenoid. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 203502. [Google Scholar]
  23. Challa, V.R.; Prasad, M.G.; Shi, Y.; Fisher, F.T. A vibration energy harvesting device with bidirectional resonance frequency tenability. Smart Mater. Struct. 2008, 17, 015035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the current sensor.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the current sensor.
Micromachines 12 01166 g001
Figure 2. Superimposition of the Ampere forces on the two conductors of the power cord.
Figure 2. Superimposition of the Ampere forces on the two conductors of the power cord.
Micromachines 12 01166 g002
Figure 3. Induced voltage as a function of the current frequency at 1 A.
Figure 3. Induced voltage as a function of the current frequency at 1 A.
Micromachines 12 01166 g003
Figure 4. Experimental set-up for 50 Hz current sensing experiments.
Figure 4. Experimental set-up for 50 Hz current sensing experiments.
Micromachines 12 01166 g004
Figure 5. Induced voltage as a function of the current at the power frequency of 50 Hz.
Figure 5. Induced voltage as a function of the current at the power frequency of 50 Hz.
Micromachines 12 01166 g005
Figure 6. Induced voltage as a function of time at 2.5 A. The inset plots the histogram of the voltages.
Figure 6. Induced voltage as a function of time at 2.5 A. The inset plots the histogram of the voltages.
Micromachines 12 01166 g006
Figure 7. Output voltage as a function of time under small current step changes.
Figure 7. Output voltage as a function of time under small current step changes.
Micromachines 12 01166 g007
Figure 8. Output powers for energy harvesting application: (a) Output power as a function of load resistance for I = 10 A; (b) Maximal power versus electric current at the frequency of 50 Hz.
Figure 8. Output powers for energy harvesting application: (a) Output power as a function of load resistance for I = 10 A; (b) Maximal power versus electric current at the frequency of 50 Hz.
Micromachines 12 01166 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, W. A High-Resolution Electric Current Sensor Employing a Piezoelectric Drum Transducer. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12101166

AMA Style

He W. A High-Resolution Electric Current Sensor Employing a Piezoelectric Drum Transducer. Micromachines. 2021; 12(10):1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12101166

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Wei. 2021. "A High-Resolution Electric Current Sensor Employing a Piezoelectric Drum Transducer" Micromachines 12, no. 10: 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12101166

APA Style

He, W. (2021). A High-Resolution Electric Current Sensor Employing a Piezoelectric Drum Transducer. Micromachines, 12(10), 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12101166

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop