Next Article in Journal
A Gene-Set Enrichment and Protein–Protein Interaction Network-Based GWAS with Regulatory SNPs Identifies Candidate Genes and Pathways Associated with Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle
Next Article in Special Issue
VviWRKY40, a WRKY Transcription Factor, Regulates Glycosylated Monoterpenoid Production by VviGT14 in Grape Berry
Previous Article in Journal
The Oncogenic Potential of the Centromeric Border Protein FAM84B of the 8q24.21 Gene Desert
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Aspects on The Interaction Between Grapevine and Plasmopara viticola: Dual-RNA-Seq Analysis Highlights Gene Expression Dynamics in The Pathogen and The Plant During The Battle For Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Grape-RNA: A Database for the Collection, Evaluation, Treatment, and Data Sharing of Grape RNA-Seq Datasets

1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Science and Enology, and CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100093, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
4
Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The authors contributed equally to this article.
Genes 2020, 11(3), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030315
Submission received: 11 February 2020 / Revised: 9 March 2020 / Accepted: 12 March 2020 / Published: 16 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Diversity of Grapevine)

Abstract

:
Since its inception, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become the most effective way to study gene expression. After more than a decade of development, numerous RNA-seq datasets have been created, and the full utilization of these datasets has emerged as a major issue. In this study, we built a comprehensive database named Grape-RNA, which is focused on the collection, evaluation, treatment, and data sharing of grape RNA-seq datasets. This database contains 1529 RNA-seq samples, 112 microRNA samples from the public platform, and 485 RNA-seq in-house datasets sequenced by our lab. We classified these data into 25 conditions and provide the sample information, cleaned raw data, expression level, assembled unigenes, useful tools, and other relevant information to the users. Thus, this study provides data and tools that should be beneficial for researchers by allowing them to easily use the RNA-seq. The provided information can greatly contribute to grape breeding and genomic and biological research. This study may improve the usage of RNA-seq.

1. Introduction

Gene expression is one of the most important processes in life activities, playing a vital role in the development and environmental adaptation of living things. The study of gene expression is fundamental for functional genomics research, especially in the post-genomic era, which began with the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2001 [1]. Unlike previous technologies, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can survey the spatial and temporal expression level of a whole genome at one time based on high-throughput sequencing technologies [2]. The expression levels of all expressed genes can be calculated accurately according to the number of reads. Therefore, RNA-seq has become the most popular method used by studies on expression levels in the life sciences.
RNA-seq has been used in almost all areas of plant science, such as in plant development, gene regulation analysis, abiotic and biotic resistance, plant breeding and cultivation, and plant evolution and diversity analysis [3,4,5,6]. For example, on the basis of the RNA-seq of some special development and ripening stages, some putative key genes that can regulate plant development were identified [4,7,8]. The RNA-seq data of overexpression plants can present new insights into the regulation network of many genes [6,9,10]. A comparison of the RNA-seq datasets of plants under different abiotic or biotic stresses can yield candidate genes related to these stresses [5,11,12,13]. Breeders can explore the inherent rules of plant breeding and cultivation according to the expression status of the RNA-seq in different plants or areas [14]. In addition, the domestication of cultivars, evolution relationships, and genome duplications of the plant genome can be identified by the assembled genes and phylogenetic analysis with transcriptome datasets [14,15,16,17]. Thus, given its numerous usages and advantages, RNA-seq has become a routine tool for plant sciences, and the datasets of RNA-seq have been continuously increasing in the last few years. However, most studies on RNA-seq have mainly focused on a few special phenotypes or target genes, and abundant useful information is missing. The full utilization of these RNA-seq datasets has become an urgent requirement for researchers. The most effective way to solve this problem is to establish user-friendly databases that can collect, treat, and share relevant data and results comprehensively. Many high-efficiency software and web-based platforms on RNA-seq and microarray have been developed and established in the last few years [18,19,20,21].
Grape is a widely cultivated fruit crop worldwide and has great economic value. Similar to other plants, numerous transcriptome studies on grape have been conducted, which have produced a number of RNA-seq datasets [4,22]. The first RNA-seq of grape was published in 2010 on the berry development of Vitis vinifera [23]. Since then, a series of RNA-seq experiments have been performed. Palumbo et al. (2014) published the RNA-seq data of 60 samples in one article to elucidate the ripening of grape berry [4]. The correlation between gene expression and berry skin anthocyanin accumulation was established in 2017 by using data from 120 samples of the RNA-seq of red and white grapevine varieties [22]. In addition to these experiments, numerous studies have provided a large number of RNA-seq datasets [5,24]. Until 2018, approximately 1500 high-quality RNA-seq datasets have been deposited in public repositories.
To enhance the utilization of these RNA-seq datasets, Moretto et al. established a database named Vespucci, which provides the normalized expression levels of 1608 samples of microarray and RNA-seq datasets [19]. This database greatly contributed to improving grape sciences. However, Vespucci is focused on the microarray data and includes only 135 RNA-seq datasets. In addition, this database only provides the normalized expression data by COLOMBOS, and it does not provide additional underlying data, such as the cleaned raw data, unigenes, and especially the fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) value of each gene. In addition, in the past three years, many new RNA-seq datasets have been published. A new professional database on grape RNA-seq should be established. This database should be richer, more accurate, comprehensive, and more user-friendly.
In this study, we collected all 1641 published RNA-seq datasets and 485 RNA-seq datasets from our lab. The published datasets included 1529 RNA-seq samples and 112 microRNA samples from the public repositories deposited before 2018. The collected data contained more than 19 Vitis species and approximately 130 varieties under 25 conditions. All public and in-house data were treated according to a standard pipeline, and all results were deposited into the Grape-RNA database (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/index.html). Grape-RNA provides high-quality raw data, expression level, unigenes of each variety, co-expression network, other useful tools (e.g., BLAST+, BLAT, and SignalP), and other relevant information services.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

All public data were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database. Detailed information is provided in Table S1 (please see supplementary materials). The in-house data were sequenced by our lab and have not been published. Detailed information can also be found in the database.

2.2. Data Treatment

The RNA-seq and microRNA data in SRA format were transformed into FASTQ format by FASTQ-DUMP (2.6.3, https://github.com/ncbi/sra-tools/wiki), and all the RNA-seq data were quality controlled by Trimmomatic (v0.36) [25] with the parameter of LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:30. The data were aligned to the 12X genome [26] by HISAT2 (v2.1.0) with the default parameters [27], and the expression levels were obtained by StringTie (v1.3.3b) [27] based on the annotation version of Genoscope12X [26] and IGGP V2.1 [28] (Figure 1). Samples with mapping rates lower than 60% were marked as problematic data and not considered in the database. The microRNA data were processed by miRDeep2 (v2.0.0.8) [29] through adaptor clipping, expression level calculation, and secondary structure identification. The minimum length of the clipped sequence were 18 nt and the used microRNA database of 186 matured microRNAs were downloaded from miRbase (http://www.mirbase.org/).

2.3. Development of Data Mining Tools

Data mining tools were developed based on a number of different software programs. BLAST+ (v2.6.0+) [30] and BLAT (v.35) [31] were used for sequence alignment. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation was obtained by eggNOG (v1.0.3) [32] using the database of eukaryotes. KEGG annotation was processed by the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS, www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/) web tools in the KEGG database (www.kegg.jp) [33]. The signal peptides of the grape were identified by SignalP (v4.1) [34] using the default parameters. Co-expression analysis was processed by WGCNA (v1.63) [35], The threshold in the co-expression analysis was 0.9. Co-expression analysis provides users with the network information, and the exported co-expression network data can be displayed by Cytoscape [36]. In this database, data visualization of expression level or other information was mainly realized by R. The heatmap tool in this database was also processed by R, and providing some versatile parameters, the result was provided in PNG and PDF. Besides this, other tools also provided some versatile parameters for users.

2.4. Database Architecture and Web Interface

All obtained data, including the cleaned raw data of RNA-seq and microRNA-seq, as well as the processed results of this database, were stored in Grape-RNA. This database was constructed on a Centos6.5 platform by using HTML5, Mysql, PHP, and Perl scripts. The web interface was written in HTML5 and CSS3. The webtools were based on several Perl scripts and some open source software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Data Source and Statistics

A total of 2126 RNA-seq grape datasets were used in this database, of which 1641 were public data in SRA format downloaded from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and 485 were unpublished in-house RNA-seq samples. The public data consisted of 1529 RNA-seq samples and 112 microRNA samples. The database also included 43.61 G RNA-seq reads, and the average size of the data was 28.52 M reads/fragments per sample (Figure 2A). These data belong to 85 experiments, 16 tissues, and 25 different treatment conditions (Table S1). Sample information can be found in the sample page (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/sample.html). Overall, the data of the Grape-RNA database cover the majority of fields in grape science.

3.2. RNA-Seq and MicroRNA Data Processing

To obtain the accurate expression levels and make them suitable for different studies, all data were processed by a standard pipeline (Figure 1). Raw RNA data were cleaned by Trimmomatic (v0.36) [25], and then the filtered clean data were mapped on the grape genome sequence (12X, Genoscope) [26] using HISAT2 (v2.1.0) [27]. Samples with mapping rates lower than 60% were marked as problematic data and not considered in the database. On average, 88.52% of reads were mapped on the reference genome (Figure 2B), and the map rate of 91.59% of the samples was higher than 80%. Afterwards, two classical and widely used annotation versions, namely, Genoscope12X [26] and IGGPV2.1 [28], were used, and the expression level (FPKM) was obtained by StringTie (v1.3.3b) [27]. When only the genes with FPKM ≥ 1 were considered, only an average of 9482 genes could be identified (Figure 2C). When this threshold was decreased to 0.05, 12,573 genes could be identified (Figure 2D). All these expression levels and other relevant information were stored in the database (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/exp.html).
The microRNA data were processed by miRDeep2 (v2.0.0.8) [29], and 186 matured microRNAs from miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/) were used as reference. The de novo miRNAs of each sample were also deposited in this database. All microRNA data, including expression level, mature sequence, precursor sequence, and other relevant information, were deposited in the database (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/exp.html).

3.3. Database Architecture and Data Mining Tools

To increase the accessibility of the expression and other information, Grape-RNA (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/index.html) was developed by using searching, versatile data mining, and data visualization tools based on LAMP, Perl, and R via a user-friendly interface (Figure 3).

3.3.1. Searching Tools

Several searching tools were developed in this database (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/transcriptome.html), such as sample search for RNA-Seq and microRNA-seq, raw data search and download, and expression level search. In regard to the sample searching tools, users can search for the sample information according to the tissue and treatment of the experiment. The result page provides detailed information, such as sample ID, NCBI accession, experiment description, and varieties. On this page, people can search the targeted samples by tissue or treatment, people also can search the sample of treatment on special tissues. For example, there are 60 samples related to heat stress, 1096 samples related to berry or berry skin, and only 48 of the samples are related to heat stress on the grape berry. The search page for the raw data requires only the sample IDs and provides the download link of all the corresponding raw data files. Two essential forms of data, gene ID [12X (GSVIVT) or IGGPv2.1 (VIT)] and sample ID (GWGT), are necessary to search for the expression level of RNA-seq. The expression level of the required genes will be listed in table format on the result page. For example, if we want to know the expression level of several genes during heat stress on grape berry, the gene ID and sample ID of 48 samples related to heat stress on grape berry should be input, and the expression level of these genes will be searched and provided on the results page. Users can also download the expression information file from a download link. This expression file can be used as the input files for the heatmap tools. Expression level of microRNA only requires the sample ID, and all microRNA information of this sample will be listed in the result page. In addition to these three search tools, we provide the search tools of GO, KEGG, NR annotation, and some related papers. These tools can supply multiple types of functional annotation of the targeted genes and give some guidance to the users, and also can do benefit to other works, such as RNA-seq analysis and gene identification.

3.3.2. Data Mining Tools

Grape-RNA includes abundant tools to make the research of related studies more convenient (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/tools.html). Some of these tools are BLAST, BLAT, GO and KEGG annotation, signal peptide identification, transmembrane finder, RT-qPCR primer design, sequence tools, and microRNA regulatory network. These tools were developed based on all existing annotation versions of 8X and 12X grape genome, and supplied the information of similar sequences, high quality primers, or the information of signal peptide, transmembrane domain, and microRNA regulation. These tools can help researchers avoid the need for complex programming languages and a huge number of computations, making the undertaking of related studies easier and more efficient. In addition, 1529 high-quality samples were used in the co-expression analysis. This analysis was based on the IGGPv2.1 annotation version and processed by WGCNA (v1.63) [35]. The threshold in the co-expression analysis was correlation coefficient > 0.9, and 15,291 high-quality genes were considered. Finally, 35 edges and nodes were identified according to the expression level. In this tool, the user can input the gene ID and obtain the potential related genes. Co-expression analysis will also provide users with the network information, and the exported co-expression network data are displayed by Cytoscape [36]. For example, if we want to know the co-expression relationship of VIT_214s0081g00540.1, we just input this gene ID into the text area, and finally we find that 177 candidate genes were involved in this network. Data visualization in this database was mainly realized by the use of R. The heatmap tools provide users with versatile parameters, facilitating the generation of the desired heatmap figures, and the result will be provided in PNG and PDF.

3.4. Procedure for Using Grape-RNA

In Grape-RNA, we provide a help page (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/help.html) to allow users to quickly begin using this database. We provide detailed instructions with a screenshot for each section. All introduction files are in PDF and can be accessed freely through the network.

3.5. Perspectives

Grape-RNA is the most comprehensive RNA-seq database for grape studies. This database considers all annotation versions and provides the expression of the two most used versions. The samples in the database are representative and cover the majority of areas in recent studies. Grape-RNA also provides a number of utilities to enhance the accessibility, clarity, and accuracy of the data. This database will improve the efficiency of utilizing the RNA-seq data and greatly contribute to grape studies.
Grape-RNA is a part of Grapeworld (www.grapeworld.cn) and can be accessed worldwide at any time. The database will be updated when enough new sequenced RNA-seq data have been collected or a new analysis method emerges.
Grape-RNA is currently the most comprehensive and versatile grape RNA-seq database and provides a user-friendly interface. Compared with VitisNet [37] and VESPUCCI [19], Grape-RNA contains more RNA-seq datasets, and classifies the samples properly. Grape-RNA also provides accurate whole genome expression levels of more than 2,000 samples and provides some related tools and information. We believe that this database can greatly contribute to grape breeding and genomic and biological research. This study may improve the usage of RNA-seq.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets that were generated and/or analyzed in this study are available in Grape-RNA (http://www.grapeworld.org/gt/index.html), and the raw data were stored in the database (http://www.grapeworld.cn/gt/rawdata.html). The 485 in-house RNA-seq datasets have been deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession PRJNA565689 and PRJNA554706.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/3/315/s1: Table S1: Detailed information of all the RNA-seq samples used in the Grape-RNA database.

Author Contributions

Z.L. and S.L. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.W. and R.Z. worked on data analysis, database architecture, and the drafting of the manuscript. S.L. and Z.L. prepared the manuscript and provided critical discussions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000105 and 2018YFD1000300), the Biodiversity Survey and Assessment Project of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China (2019HJ2096001006), the National Science Foundation of China (31772266), and the Agricultural Breeding Project of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (NXNYYZ20150203).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the researchers who shared their grape RNA-seq data on the public platform.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Venter, J.C.; Adams, M.D.; Myers, E.W.; Li, P.W.; Mural, R.J.; Sutton, G.G.; Smith, H.O.; Yandell, M.; Evans, C.A.; Holt, R.A.; et al. The Sequence of the Human Genome. Science 2001, 291, 1304–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, Z.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dai, F.; Chen, Z.H.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Jin, G.; Wu, D.; Cai, S.; Wang, N.; Wu, F.; Nevo, E.; et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals mosaic genomic origins of modern cultivated barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 13403–13408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Palumbo, M.C.; Zenoni, S.; Fasoli, M.; Massonnet, M.; Farina, L.; Castiglione, F.; Pezzotti, M.; Paci, P. Integrated Network Analysis Identifies Fight-Club Nodes as a Class of Hubs Encompassing Key Putative Switch Genes That Induce Major Transcriptome Reprogramming during Grapevine Development. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4617–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jiang, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, G.; Li, S.; Wang, L. Integrating Omics and Alternative Splicing Reveals Insights into Grape Response to High Temperature. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1502–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sun, X.; Matus, J.T.; Wong, D.C.J.; Wang, Z.; Chai, F.; Zhang, L.; Fang, T.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y.; Han, Y.; et al. The GARP/MYB-related grape transcription factor AQUILO improves cold tolerance and promotes the accumulation of raffinose family oligosaccharides. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1749–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Uluisik, S.; Chapman, N.H.; Smith, R.; Poole, M.; Adams, G.; Gillis, R.B.; Besong, T.M.; Sheldon, J.; Stiegelmeyer, S.; Perez, L.; et al. Genetic improvement of tomato by targeted control of fruit softening. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 950–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Shinozaki, Y.; Nicolas, P.; Fernandez-Pozo, N.; Ma, Q.; Evanich, D.J.; Shi, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Snyder, S.I.; Martin, L.B.B.; et al. High-resolution spatiotemporal transcriptome mapping of tomato fruit development and ripening. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, X.; Zhao, T.; Gan, S.; Ren, X.; Fang, L.; Karungo, S.K.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Xin, H. Ethylene positively regulates cold tolerance in grapevine by modulating the expression of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 057. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.; Xi, H.; Dai, Z.; Lecourieux, F.; Yuan, L.; Liu, X.; Patra, B.; Wei, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, L. VvWRKY8 represses stilbene synthase genes through direct interaction with VvMYB14 to control resveratrol biosynthesis in grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 715–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hittalmani, S.; Mahesh, H.B.; Shirke, M.D.; Biradar, H.; Uday, G.; Aruna, Y.R.; Lohithaswa, H.C.; Mohanrao, A. Genome and Transcriptome sequence of Finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) provides insights into drought tolerance and nutraceutical properties. BMC Genomics 2017, 18, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Londo, J.P.; Kovaleski, A.P.; Lillis, J.A. Divergence in the transcriptional landscape between low temperature and freeze shock in cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ma, Y.; Liu, M.; Stiller, J.; Liu, C. A pan-transcriptome analysis shows that disease resistance genes have undergone more selection pressure during barley domestication. BMC Genomics 2019, 20, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yoo, M.J.; Wendel, J.F. Comparative evolutionary and developmental dynamics of the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber transcriptome. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Koenig, D.; Jimenez-Gomez, J.M.; Kimura, S.; Fulop, D.; Chitwood, D.H.; Headland, L.R.; Kumar, R.; Covington, M.F.; Devisetty, U.K.; Tat, A.V.; et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. 2013, 110, E2655–E2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Xiang, Y.; Huang, C.H.; Hu, Y.; Wen, J.; Li, S.; Yi, T.; Chen, H.; Xiang, J.; Ma, H. Evolution of Rosaceae Fruit Types Based on Nuclear Phylogeny in the Context of Geological Times and Genome Duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 262–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, S.; Zhong, M.; Dong, X.; Jiang, X.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, F.; Li, D.Z.; Tang, K.; Wang, S.; et al. Comparative transcriptomics identifies patterns of selection in roses. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gayali, S.; Acharya, S.; Lande, N.V.; Pandey, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborty, N. CicerTransDB 1.0: A resource for expression and functional study of chickpea transcription factors. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Moretto, M.; Sonego, P.; Pilati, S.; Malacarne, G.; Costantini, L.; Grzeskowiak, L.; Bagagli, G.; Grando, M.S.; Moser, C.; Engelen, K. VESPUCCI: Exploring Patterns of Gene Expression in Grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Narise, T.; Sakurai, N.; Obayashi, T.; Ohta, H.; Shibata, D. Co-expressed Pathways DataBase for Tomato: A database to predict pathways relevant to a query gene. BMC Genomics 2017, 18, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zouine, M.; Maza, E.; Djari, A.; Lauvernier, M.; Frasse, P.; Smouni, A.; Pirrello, J.; Bouzayen, M. TomExpress, a unified tomato RNA-Seq platform for visualization of expression data, clustering and correlation networks. Plant J. 2017, 92, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Massonnet, M.; Fasoli, M.; Tornielli, G.B.; Altieri, M.; Sandri, M.; Zuccolotto, P.; Paci, P.; Gardiman, M.; Zenoni, S.; Pezzotti, M. Transcriptomic differences in grapevine varieties correlate with berry anthocyanin skin. Plant Physiol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zenoni, S.; Ferrarini, A.; Giacomelli, E.; Xumerle, L.; Fasoli, M.; Malerba, G.; Bellin, D.; Pezzotti, M.; Delledonne, M. Characterization of transcriptional complexity during berry development in Vitis vinifera using RNA-Seq. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1787–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Weng, K.; Li, Z.-Q.; Liu, R.-Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.-J.; Xu, Y. Transcriptome of Erysiphe necator-infected Vitis pseudoreticulata leaves provides insight into grapevine resistance to powdery mildew. Hortic. Res. 2014, 1, 14049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bolger, A.M.; Usadel, B.; Lohse, M. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jaillon, O.; Aury, J.M.; Noel, B.; Policriti, A.; Clepet, C.; Casagrande, A.; Choisne, N.; Aubourg, S.; Vitulo, N.; Jubin, C.; et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pertea, M.; Kim, D.; Pertea, G.M.; Leek, J.T.; Salzberg, S.L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vitulo, N.; Forcato, C.; Carpinelli, E.C.; Telatin, A.; Campagna, D.; D’Angelo, M.; Zimbello, R.; Corso, M.; Vannozzi, A.; Bonghi, C.; et al. A deep survey of alternative splicing in grape reveals changes in the splicing machinery related to tissue, stress condition and genotype. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Friedlander, M.R.; Mackowiak, S.D.; Li, N.; Chen, W.; Rajewsky, N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mount, D.W. Using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). CSH Protoc. 2007, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kent, W.J. BLAT—The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Forslund, K.; Coelho, L.P.; Szklarczyk, D.; Jensen, L.J.; von Mering, C.; Bork, P. Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D457–D462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Petersen, T.N.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: Discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 785–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Franz, M.; Lopes, C.T.; Huck, G.; Dong, Y.; Sumer, O.; Bader, G.D. Cytoscape. js: A graph theory library for visualisation and analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 32, 309–311. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Jérôme, G.; Grant, R.C.; Julie, A.D.; Kathy, M.; John, V.H.; Anne, Y.F. VitisNet: Omics Integration through Grapevine Molecular Networks. PLoS ONE 2009, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The standard pipeline of the treatment of public and private RNA-seq data.
Figure 1. The standard pipeline of the treatment of public and private RNA-seq data.
Genes 11 00315 g001
Figure 2. A landscape of the mapping data and expression. (A) Reads number distribution of all samples in Grape-RNA. (B) Mapping rate distribution of all samples in this database. (C) Gene number (FPKM > 1) distribution of all these samples. (D) Gene number (FPKM > 0.05) distribution of all these samples.
Figure 2. A landscape of the mapping data and expression. (A) Reads number distribution of all samples in Grape-RNA. (B) Mapping rate distribution of all samples in this database. (C) Gene number (FPKM > 1) distribution of all these samples. (D) Gene number (FPKM > 0.05) distribution of all these samples.
Genes 11 00315 g002
Figure 3. The detail information and architecture structure of Grape-RNA.
Figure 3. The detail information and architecture structure of Grape-RNA.
Genes 11 00315 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liang, Z.; Li, S. Grape-RNA: A Database for the Collection, Evaluation, Treatment, and Data Sharing of Grape RNA-Seq Datasets. Genes 2020, 11, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030315

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhang R, Liang Z, Li S. Grape-RNA: A Database for the Collection, Evaluation, Treatment, and Data Sharing of Grape RNA-Seq Datasets. Genes. 2020; 11(3):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yi, Rui Zhang, Zhenchang Liang, and Shaohua Li. 2020. "Grape-RNA: A Database for the Collection, Evaluation, Treatment, and Data Sharing of Grape RNA-Seq Datasets" Genes 11, no. 3: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030315

APA Style

Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Liang, Z., & Li, S. (2020). Grape-RNA: A Database for the Collection, Evaluation, Treatment, and Data Sharing of Grape RNA-Seq Datasets. Genes, 11(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop