Effects of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards: A Case Study of Huizhou, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.2.1. Remote Sensing Interpretation of Longan and Litchi Orchards
2.2.2. Biophysical Data for the Evaluation of Pollination Services
2.2.3. Land-Use Data
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. InVEST-Pollination Module
2.3.2. Hotspot Analyses
2.3.3. Geographical Detector (Geodetector)
3. Results
3.1. Land Use and Its Change in Huizhou
3.1.1. Characteristics of Land-Use Changes
3.1.2. Longan and Litchi Orchards and Their Characteristics
3.2. Characteristics of the Spatiotemporal Change of Wild Bee Abundance of Litchi and Longan in Huizhou
3.2.1. Characteristics of Quantitative Change of the Wild Bee Abundance of Litchi and Longan
3.2.2. Changes in the Spatial Pattern of Wild Bee Abundance for Litchi and Longan Orchards in Huizhou
3.2.3. Influencing Factors Analysis of Pollination Service for Litchi and Longan Orchards
3.3. Effects of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards
3.4. Influence Mechanism of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards
4. Discussion
4.1. Comparison of the Results with Other Studies
4.2. Methods Application and Improvement
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The area of land use types suitable for nesting by pollinators and the area of land-use types with nectar-pollen plant resources demonstrated a downward trend from 2015 to 2019. Forest land and rainfed cropland were reduced by 16.9 km2 and 15.42 km2, respectively, primarily due to the conversion of these lands to construction land. The reduced area was concentrated in the central and southwest regions. Owing to ecological restorations, 8.848 km2 of construction land was converted to forest land. The area of litchi and longan orchards decreased by 31.72 km2, which is a reduction of 12.22%. The reduction areas were primarily concentrated in the central, western, and southwestern regions.
- (2)
- The pollinator abundance in the litchi and longan orchards and their buffer zones decreased by 6.64% and 13.94%, respectively, between 2015 and 2019. The pollinator abundance in forest land and rainfed cropland decreased to varying degrees. The cold spots increased in space, whereas the hot spots decreased in size and became more dispersed. The decrease in the pollinator abundance was mainly concentrated in the midwestern and southwestern regions. The main reasons for this may be the decrease in the area of litchi and longan orchards, forest lands, and rainfed croplands, as well as landscape fragmentation.
- (3)
- Forest land area, rainfed cropland area, litchi and longan orchards area, and forest landscape fragmentation were the dominant Influencing factors of the pollination services for litchi and longan orchards, whose impact degrees on the pollination services were 0.20, 0.16, 0.21, and 0.26, respectively. Forest land area and litchi and longan orchards area will jointly affect the pollination services for litchi and longan orchards, and the degree of the interactive impact of these two factors on the pollination services is 0.50, which is the maximum interactive impact degree. In the study area, the area change and land-use change of natural or semi-natural habitats, such as forest land, rainfed cropland, and grassland, affected the pollination services for litchi and longan orchards. The reduction of forest land area and the conversion of forest land to construction land have the greatest impact on the pollination services of litchi and longan orchards.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 25, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daily, G.C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (1997). In The Future of Nature: Documents of Global Change, 1st ed.; Robin, L., Sörlin, S., Warde, P., Eds.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2003; pp. 454–464. [Google Scholar]
- Assessment, M.E. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water, 1st ed.; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; 80p. [Google Scholar]
- Assessment, M.E. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment, 1st ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; 245p. [Google Scholar]
- Otieno, M.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Potts, S.G.; Kinuthia, W.; Garratt, M. Enhancing legume crop pollination and natural pest regulation for improved food security in changing African landscapes. Glob. Food Secur. 2020, 26, 100394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ollerton, J.; Winfree, R.; Tarrant, S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 2011, 120, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Lan, C.; Xu, J.; Li, X.; Li, J. Assessment of pollination and China’s implementation strategies within the IPBES framework. Biodivers. Sci. 2016, 24, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Potts, S.G.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Kremen, C.; Neumann, P.; Schweiger, O.; Kunin, W.E. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Betts, M.G.; Hadley, A.S.; Kormann, U. The Landscape Ecology of Pollination; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 34, pp. 961–966. [Google Scholar]
- Dalsgaard, B. Land-use and climate impacts on plant–pollinator interactions and pollination services. Diversity 2020, 12, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimi, E.; Barghjelveh, S.; Dong, P. Using the Lonsdorf model for estimating habitat loss and fragmentation effects on pollination service. Ecol. Process. 2021, 10, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricketts, T.H.; Regetz, J.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Cunningham, S.A.; Kremen, C.; Bogdanski, A.; Gemmill-Herren, B.; Greenleaf, S.S.; Klein, A.M.; Mayfield, M.M. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: Are there general patterns? Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tscharntke, T.; Klein, A.M.; Kruess, A.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Thies, C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 857–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lázaro, A.; Fuster, F.; Alomar, D.; Totland, Ø. Disentangling direct and indirect effects of habitat fragmentation on wild plants’ pollinator visits and seed production. Ecol. Appl. 2020, 30, e02099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olynyk, M.; Westwood, A.R.; Koper, N. Effects of natural habitat loss and edge effects on wild bees and pollination services in remnant prairies. Environ. Entomol. 2021, 50, 732–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, P.; Song, X.; Xia, B.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y. Temporal-spatial dynamics of wild bee diversity in agricultural landscapes in Changping District, Beijing. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2018, 26, 357–366. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, M.; Lu, X.; Cui, Y.; Wang, M.; Ding, S. Effects of woodland types with different levels of human disturbance on pollinators: A case study in Gongyi, Henan, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 464–474. [Google Scholar]
- Kremen, C.; Williams, N.M.; Aizen, M.A.; Gemmill-Herren, B.; LeBuhn, G.; Minckley, R.; Packer, L.; Potts, S.G.; Roulston, T.a.; Steffan-Dewenter, I. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Wang, D.; Zhou, M.; Cai, Y. Pollination service analysis of Chongming wild bee based on InVEST model. J. Anhui Agric. Univ. 2018, 45, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, C.; Zhen, L.; Wang, C.; Hu, J.; Du, B. Biodiversity simulation of Poyang Lake wetlands by InVEST model under different scenarios. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2015, 24, 1119–1125. [Google Scholar]
- Zulian, G.; Maes, J.; Paracchini, M.L. Linking land cover data and crop yields for mapping and assessment of pollination services in Europe. Land 2013, 2, 472–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, P.; Wu, J.; Li, H.; Lin, S. Evaluation of economic value of agricultural bee pollination in China. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2011, 24, 5117–5123. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.; Li, B.; Zhu, R.; Chang, S. Study on tree species identification by combining Sentinel-1 and JL101A images. For. Eng. 2020, 36, 40–48. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, W.; Zen, J.; Jiang, B. Compare the Pollination effects of Litchi chinensis and Dimocarpus longan by Apis mellifera Hgustica and A. cerana cerana. Apic. China 2011, 62, 51–53. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Y.; Zhao, D.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J. Study of Pollinating Insect of Dimocarpus longana. Apic. China 2014, 65, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Li, Y. Insect Ecology in China, 2nd ed.; Chongqing University Press: Chongqing, China, 2019; 692p. [Google Scholar]
- Michener, C.D. The Bees of the World, 2nd ed.; JHU Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2007; 953p. [Google Scholar]
- Vrdoljak, S.M.; Samways, M.J. Optimising coloured pan traps to survey flower visiting insects. J. Insect Conserv. 2012, 16, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.; Wang, X.; Shen, Z.; Tang, Z.; He, J.; Yu, D.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, C.; Zhu, J.; et al. The main contents, methods and technical specifications of plant community investigation. J. Biodivers. 2009, 6, 533–548. [Google Scholar]
- Ke, X. Botany of Nectar Plants, 1st ed.; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 1995; 226p. [Google Scholar]
- InVEST. Natural Capital Project. Available online: https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest (accessed on 17 June 2022).
- Lonsdorf, E.; Kremen, C.; Ricketts, T.; Winfree, R.; Williams, N.; Greenleaf, S. Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 1589–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gathmann, A.; Tscharntke, T. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Fang, C.; Wang, S. Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 545–546, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getis, A.; Ord, K. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geogr. Anal. 1992, 24, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, T.; Fu, B. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Xu, C. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2017, 72, 116–134. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Liao, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chi, M.; Lan, S.; Gan, Q. Interactive Effects on Habitat Quality Using InVEST and GeoDetector Models in Wenzhou, China. Land 2022, 11, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polykretis, C.a.C.; Grillakis, M.G.a.C.; Argyriou, A.V.a.C.; Papadopoulos, N.G.a.C.; Alexakis, D.D.a.C. Integrating multivariate (Geodetector) and bivariate (iv) statistics for hybrid landslide susceptibility modeling: A case of the vicinity of pinios artificial lake, ilia, greece. Land 2021, 10, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groff, S.C.; Loftin, C.S.; Drummond, F.; Bushmann, S.; McGill, B. Parameterization of the InVEST Crop Pollination Model to spatially predict abundance of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) native bee pollinators in Maine, USA. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Munzenberg, U.; Burger, C.T.; Tscharntke, T. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 2002, 83, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kennedy, C.M.; Lonsdorf, E.; Neel, M.C.; Williams, N.M.; Ricketts, T.H.; Winfree, R.; Bommarco, R.; Brittain, C.; Burley, A.L.; Cariveau, D.; et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 584–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polce, C.; Termansen, M.; Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J.; Boatman, N.D.; Budge, G.E.; Crowe, A.; Garratt, M.P.; Pietravalle, S.; Potts, S.G.; Ramirez, J.; et al. Species Distribution Models for Crop Pollination: A Modelling Framework Applied to Great Britain. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garibaldi, L.A.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Kremen, C.; Morales, J.M.; Bommarco, R.; Cunningham, S.A.; Carvalheiro, L.s.G.; Chacoff, N.P.; Dudenhoffer, J.H.; Greenleaf, S.S.; et al. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Description | Interaction Type |
---|---|
q(X1∩X2) < Min[q(X1), q(X2)] | Nonlinear-weaken |
Min[q(X1), q(X2)] < q(X1∩X2) < Max[q(X1), q(X2)] | Univariate-weaken |
q(X1∩X2) > Max[q(X1), q(X2)] | Bivariate-enhanced |
q(X1∩X2) = q(X1) + q(X2) | Independent |
q(X1∩X2) > q(X1) + q(X2) | Nonlinear-enhanced |
Land-Use Types | 2015 | 2019 | 2015–2019 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (km2) | Proportion (%) | Area (km2) | Proportion (%) | Changing Range (km2) | |
Irrigated cropland | 1827.77 | 16.21 | 1805.66 | 16.01 | −22.11 |
Rainfed cropland | 837.41 | 7.43 | 821.99 | 7.29 | −15.42 |
Forest land | 7197.46 | 63.82 | 7180.56 | 63.67 | −16.90 |
Grassland | 265.45 | 2.35 | 263.74 | 2.34 | −1.71 |
Water bodies | 367.07 | 3.25 | 357.72 | 3.17 | −9.35 |
Construction land | 780.73 | 6.92 | 846.21 | 7.50 | 65.48 |
Unutilized land | 1.51 | 0.01 | 1.52 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
2015 | 2019 | Rate of Change | |
---|---|---|---|
Total in the buffer zone | 116,830.28 | 100,530.53 | −13.94% |
Total in litchi and longan orchards | 442.33 | 412.93 | −6.64% |
Average in rainfed cropland of the buffer zone | 0.0063 | 0.0057 | −9.52% |
Standard deviation in rainfed cropland of the buffer zone | 0.0026 | 0.0024 | −0.08% |
Average in rainfed cropland of the whole region | 0.0059 | 0.0053 | −10.17% |
Standard deviation in rainfed cropland of the whole region | 0.0028 | 0.0026 | −0.07% |
Average in the forest land of the buffer zone | 0.0214 | 0.0196 | −8.41% |
Standard deviation in the forest land of the buffer zone | 0.0038 | 0.0036 | −0.05% |
Average in the forest land of the whole region | 0.0218 | 0.0202 | −7.34% |
Standard deviation in the forest land of the whole region | 0.0039 | 0.0037 | −0.05% |
Influencing Factors | Forest Land Area | Grassland Area | Rainfed Cropland Area | Litchi and Longan Orchards Area | Forest Fragmentation Degree | Grass Fragmentation Degree | Rainfed Cropland Fragmentation Degree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forest land area | 0.20 | ||||||
Grassland area | 0.34 * | 0.02 | |||||
Rainfed cropland area | 0.39 * | 0.19 | 0.16 | ||||
Litchi and longan orchards area | 0.50 * | 0.25 * | 0.27 | 0.21 | |||
Forest fragmentation degree | 0.36 | 0.32 * | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.26 | ||
Grass fragmentation degree | 0.29 * | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.03 | |
Rainfed cropland fragmentation degree | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
Land-Use Types | Area Change 2015–2019 (km2) | Wild Bee Abundance Index (sum) in Land-Use Types | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2019 | Abundance Index Change of Wild Bee | ||
Irrigated cropland | −22.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Rainfed cropland | −15.42 | 7.04 | 6.32 | −0.72 |
Forest land | −16.90 | 23.82 | 21.78 | −2.03 |
Grassland | −1.71 | 10.63 | 9.60 | −1.03 |
Water bodies | −9.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Construction land | 65.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Unutilized land | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Litchi and longan orchards | 31.72 | 1.70 | 1.84 | 0.14 |
Types of Land-Use Conversion | Area Change (km2) | Abundance Index Change of Wild Bee | Abundance Index Change of Wild Bee per Unit Area |
---|---|---|---|
Construction land to Rainfed cropland | 14.68 | 11.93 | 0.81 |
Forest land to Construction land | 20.95 | −18.40 | −0.88 |
Rainfed cropland to Construction land | 16.94 | −5.56 | −0.33 |
Forest land to Irrigated cropland | 3.19 | −4.95 | −1.55 |
Irrigated cropland to Forest land | 3.08 | 2.92 | 0.95 |
Irrigated cropland to Construction land | 19.29 | −0.12 | −0.01 |
Water bodies to Construction land | 7.59 | −0.08 | −0.01 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ke, Q.; Chen, S.; Zhao, D.; Li, M.; Sun, C. Effects of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards: A Case Study of Huizhou, China. Land 2022, 11, 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071073
Ke Q, Chen S, Zhao D, Li M, Sun C. Effects of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards: A Case Study of Huizhou, China. Land. 2022; 11(7):1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071073
Chicago/Turabian StyleKe, Qinhua, Shuang Chen, Dandan Zhao, Minting Li, and Chuanzhun Sun. 2022. "Effects of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards: A Case Study of Huizhou, China" Land 11, no. 7: 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071073
APA StyleKe, Q., Chen, S., Zhao, D., Li, M., & Sun, C. (2022). Effects of Land-Use Change on the Pollination Services for Litchi and Longan Orchards: A Case Study of Huizhou, China. Land, 11(7), 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071073