1. Introduction
Porphyry deposits are the major sources of Cu, Mo, and Re in the world [
1]; they also provide significant amounts of Ag, Au, and some other metals. These deposits are the products of large hydrothermal systems that developed due to magmatic–hydrothermal phenomena in and around intermediate-to-felsic intrusions, emplaced at relatively high levels in the crust (1–6 km below the paleosurface) [
1,
2]. Metal-rich fluids exsolve from the shallow-crustal intrusive complexes and alter and mineralize the upper parts of the causative intrusions and the surrounding country rocks. These may be simple systems, consisting of a single intrusion with an associated alteration halo and a high-temperature ore, or more complicated systems of numerous intrusions with overlapping stages of alteration and ore deposition that formed over a wide range of temperatures [
3].
Rock crystallization occurs due to pressure quenching, generating the diagnostic porphyritic texture of the mineralizing intrusions. Episodic brittle failure and fluid release from the crystallizing magmas produce a multistage vein stockwork that hosts the bulk of the ore [
4]. Mineralization styles include stockwork veins, hydrothermal breccias, disseminations in the groundmass and, rarely, wall-rock replacements.
Epithermal fluids can potentially dissolve significant amounts of gold and silver from porphyry deposits, because the solubility of precious metals, such as aqueous bisulfide complexes, increases with decreasing temperatures when aqueous H
2S contents remain high [
5]. Late-stage processes commence the final stage of porphyry ore formation and the formation of peripheral Ag-Au ore deposits.
Porphyry Cu-Au-Mo deposits mostly formed in the tectonic setting of continental and oceanic arcs, concentrated in the Pacific Rim. They also occur in the Tethyan arc from Europe to Asia, and others are scattered in volcanic arcs of all ages, with rare examples as old as the Archean [
6,
7,
8]. The rarity of porphyry deposits in the Precambrian provokes a particular interest in their investigation.
The Archean Cu-Mo porphyry deposit of Pellapahk in the Kolmozero–Voronya greenstone belt (Kola Peninsula) is the only porphyry deposit in the northeastern part of the Fennoscandian Shield [
9]. Cu-Mo mineralization was discovered in 1975 and studied in the 1970s and 1980s by the Central Kola Expedition (Monchegorsk, Russian Federation), and later in 2003–2010 by JSC Black Fox Resources (Ovoca Gold group) with diamond drilling (total 68 drillholes) and minor trenching. As a result of the investigations, a large stockwork of a complicated form with poor ores (200.5 million tons of ore with an average Mo content of 0.028%, Cu 0.154%, 2.0 g/t Ag, and 0.08g/t Au) [
10,
11] was contoured and traced down to a depth of 360 m. Cu-Mo mineralization was shown to be economically valuable in the case of an increase in the price of molybdenum [
9].
The Oleninskoe gold–silver deposit and numerous gold occurrences are located in a neighborhood of the Pellapahk. Gold mineralization in the Oleninskoe deposit was discovered in 1969–1972 [
12], and studied in the 1970s and 1980s by the Central Kola Expedition (Monchegorsk, Russian Federation), in 1997–1998 by Voronya Minerals JSC (Boliden AB group), and later in 2005–2008 by Black Fox Resources JSC (Ovoca Gold group) with intense trenching and drilling (total 61 drillholes). The Oleninskoe is a medium gold deposit, consisting of a number of mineralized lenses, with average gold content of 7.6 g/t. Resources of Au in the deposit are estimated at 10 t [
13], while Ag resources have not been estimated. The Oleninskoe differs from all other gold deposits in the northeastern part of the Fennoscandian Shield in diverse mineralization of Pb, Ag, Sb, and Au. We consider the Oleninskoe deposit as a part of an Archean porphyry-epithermal system. This new genetic model of the mineral deposits in the Kolmozero–Voronya belt is discussed below.
2. Materials and Methods
Gold, silver, and Cu-Mo mineralization was studied in the specimens and samples (1.5–10 kg), collected by the authors in the outcrops and trenches in 1981–1983, then in 1997–1998, and again in 2017. Investigations of wall-rock alteration, metasomatic zoning, and determination of pre-ore, ore-related, and post-ore mineral assemblages in altered rocks were based on the study of rocks in the outcrops and in drillcores, the examination of mineral relations in thin and polished sections, as well as on the results of assays of primary and altered rocks. The samples were assayed for major (rock-forming) elements, Au and Ag, in the chemical laboratory of the Geological Institute, Kola Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), and with pre-concentration of gold and silver with p-alkylaniline and oil sulfides. The data on trace elements, which determined the geochemical characteristics of the deposits, were obtained by ICP-MS in the Institute of Geology and Geochemistry of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, Ekaterinburg, and in the Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Petrography (IGEM), Russian Academy of Science, Moscow.
Mineral composition of the ores was studied in thin and polished sections with the reflected light microscope Axioplan 2 Imaging (Karl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), and with the electron microscope LEO-1450 (Karl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) in the Geological Institute of the Kola Science Center.
The preliminary estimation of the composition of mineral species was performed with the energy-dispersive system Bruker XFlash-5010. Microprobe analysis (MS-46, CAMECA, Gennevilliers Cedex, France, 22 kV; 30–40 nA, standards (analytical lines): Fe10S11 (FeKα, SKα), Bi2Se3 (BiMα, SeKα), LiNd (MoO4)2 (MoLα), Co (CoKα), Ni (NiKα), Pd (PdLα), Ag (AgLα), Te (TeLα), Au (AuLα) was performed for grains larger than 20 µm (analyst Ye. Savchenko). The identification of some rare mineral phases was verified with X-ray analysis in the Geological Institute of the Kola Science Center (analyst E. Selivanova). Visually homogenous material of 50 × 10 μm or more in size was extracted from the polished sections and examined with the X-ray powder diffraction (Debye–Scherer) on URS-1 (Burevestnik, Irkutsk, Russia) operated at 40 kV and 16 mA with an RKU-114.7 mm camera and FeKα radiation.
The assaying of fluid inclusions was performed by Vsevolod Prokofiev (IGEM) in 0.5 g quartz samples, collected from −0.5 + 0.25 mm fraction with methods described in [
14] (analyst Yu.Vasyuta, TsNIGRI, Moscow, Russia). The inclusions in quartz were thermally disclosed at 500 °C. The quantity of water for the calculation of element concentration in the solution, carbonic acid, methane, and other hydrocarbons was defined with the method of gas chromatography on a TsVET-100 chromatograph (Dzerzhinsk, Russia). Cl, SO
4, and F were assayed with ion chromatography on a TsVET-3006 (detection limit 0.01 mg/L), and K, Na, Ca, and Mg with ICP-MS in aqueous extracts.
Zircon U-Pb dating was undertaken at the Geological Institute of the Kola Science Center. Prior to analysis, zircons were extracted using standard magnetic and heavy liquid separation, with surface contamination removed using alcohol, acetone, and 1 M HNO3.
The zircon dissolution and chemical recovery of Pb and U was performed using the technique described in [
15], with U and Pb concentrations determined by isotope dilution employing a Finnigan MAT-262 (RPQ) (Finnigan MAT, San Jose, CA, USA) mass spectrometer and a mixed 208Pb + 235U tracer, with silica gel used as an ion emitter. Blank levels had maximum values of 100 ng Pb and 10–50 ng U, and all isotope ratios were corrected for mass fractionation by analysis of the SRM-981 and SRM-982 standards (0.12 ± 0.44%). The uncertainties of the resulting U-Pb ratios are 0.5%. The raw experimental data were processed using PbDAT (Version 1.21) and ISOPLOT (Version 2.06) [
16,
17], with age values calculated using conventional U decay constant values [
18] and common Pb corrections following [
19]. All uncertainties are reported at a 2σ confidence level.
3. Geological Setting of the Kolmozero–VoronyaBelt
The Kolmozero–Voronya greenstone belt separates the Murmansk block from the Kola Province of the Fennoscandian Shield (
Figure 1A). The belt has an approximately 140 km strike length and a width of up to 10–12 km.
The history of the formation of the belt, as described in [
20], includes the following events: formation of an island arc at 2.87–2.83 Ga; a break of 50 million years, and subsequent accretion of the island arc to the Murmansk continent; formation of an accretionary orogen (2.78–2.76 Ga); probable collapse of the orogen with formation of post-orogenic (or possibly anorogenic) granite intrusions in the central and southern parts of the belt (2.74–2.72 Ga). The total time of the belt development was about 150 Ma [
20].
The structure of the belt is considered a monoclinal set of thrust sheets, with volcanics showing indications of oceanic and island arc magmatism [
21,
22]. The Archean supracrustal sequences of the belt comprise volcanics of tholeiite–komatiite and dacite–andesite–basalt series (the Kolmozero series), and subordinate sedimentary rocks: pelites and sandstones (at the basement of the Kolmozero series and the Porosozero series) (
Figure 1B,C). The total thickness of the cross-section is 1800–2000 m.
Supracrustal sequences in the northwestern part of the Kolmozero–Voronya belt were intruded by:
Gabbro, pyroxenite, and peridotite co-magmatic to the Kolmozero series volcanics;
Quartz porphyry intrusions of the gabbrodiorite–diorite–granodiorite–granite series (the U-Pb age is 2.82–2.83 Ga, more details are given below);
Plagiomicrocline and tourmaline granites (the U-Pb age of zircon from the tourmaline granite is 2451 ± 60 Ma [
23]);
Rare metal and tourmaline pegmatite veins (the U-Pb age of microlite from the Cs-Li pegmatite Vasin-Mylk deposit is 2454 ± 8 Ma [
24]);
More than one generation of dolerite and picrite porphyry dykes of Proterozoic and possibly Paleozoic age.
The rocks of the Kolmozero–Voronya belt were metamorphosed twice under conditions of the lower amphibolite facies: in the Neoarchean (2.7–2.8 Ga) and Paleoproterozoic (1.9–1.8 Ga) [
25,
26]. The PT-parameters of the early metamorphism were T~600 °C, P = 3–4 kbar. At the late stage of metamorphism, the temperature was a little lower (530 °C on the average), but pressure was higher (~5.5 kbar) [
26]. In the northwestern part of the belt, the mineral associations of the late metamorphic stage only partly replaced the early stage associations (paramorphoses of kyanite after andalusite, decomposition of cordierite in the outer parts of the grains (
Figure 2), re-crystallization of biotite and muscovite).
Three main fault systems are defined in the belt (
Figure 1B) [
29,
30,
31]. Deep faults of a NW direction along the boundaries of the belt comprise the first system. The second system unites strike–slip faults and shears of a NW up to latitudinal direction. These faults separate volcanic-sedimentary rock series or cut the stratigraphic boundaries at an acute angle of 5–15°. The faults of the second system can be traced for a few kilometers; the shears control zones of rock alteration [
32]. The third fault system includes faults of a NE up to sub-meridional direction, which divide the belt into a number of blocks displaced for hundreds of meters. The faults of the third system are often marked by dolerite and picrite porphyry dykes (
Figure 1).
5. Discussion
The fact that the intrusions, which host the Pellapahk and the Oleninskoe deposits, refer to one and the same intrusive complex, can be proved by the age of the rocks and by their geochemical characteristics.
The age of the Pellapahk intrusion is 2828 ± 8 Ma, and the age of the Oleninskoe granite porphyry sills is 2817 ± 9 Ma; the values match within the error limits. The difference between the older and the younger ages does not exceed the typical duration of porphyry systems development (10–20 Ma) defined in the Phanerozoic belts [
2].
Chemical composition of the unaltered rocks from the deposits does not differ significantly: all of them belong to the calc-alkaline series of metaluminous granites with moderate alkalinity, and the fields of rock composition overlap in the classification diagrams (
Figure 5).
The REE spectra of granite porphyry from the studied deposits are of the same form, characterized by enrichment in light REE and the absence of the Eu anomaly (
Figure 6). This form of spectrum is typical for I-granites formed in zones of subduction and island arcs [
34], and differs significantly from the REE spectra of tourmaline plagiomicrocline anorogenic granites from the intrusions located north of the Pellapahk (
Figure 1) [
48].
In the Phanerozoic belts, the porphyry intrusions form at a depth of 1–6 km and produce magmatic porphyry-epithermal ore systems, which occur in near-surface conditions. These systems show a specific vertical and lateral zoning in rock alteration and in the distribution of the mineralization, from deep to shallow horizons (and from the center to the edge) (Mo, Cu)–(Cu)–(Pb, Zn)–(Au, Ag, As, Sb); the zoning can be full or fragmentary [
2,
40,
49,
50]. Similar systems formed in the Precambrian, or even in the Archean, but the probability they were preserved and have not been eroded since that time is low.
If we consider the Pellapahk and the Oleninskoe deposits as parts of an Archean porphyry-epithermal system, then the Pellapahk Cu-Mo deposit is located at its centre, and the Oleninskoe (Au, Ag, As, Sb) is a distal epithermal deposit in relation to the Pellapahk deposit.
Porphyry Cu deposits in the Phanerozoic are known to display a consistent, broad-scale alteration zoning that comprises, centrally from the bottom upward, zones of sodic-calcic, potassic, chlorite-sericite, sericitic, and advanced argillic (quartz–pyrophyllite, quartz-alunite, quartz-kaolinite) alteration [
2,
4]. In the Pellapahk deposit, we see zones of quartz-microcline (potassic alteration), quartz-muscovite (sericitic zone), and quartz-andalusite-muscovite (advanced argillic zone) metasomatic rocks (
Figure 2 and
Figure 3). This zoning generally corresponds that described for the Phanerozoic deposits, but the altered rocks of the Pellapahk deposit were later metamorphosed: sericite was replaced by muscovite, and alumina silicates of the argillic zone (pyrophyllite, alunite, kaolinite) by andalusite during the Neoarchean metamorphism of lower amphibolite facies. Subsequently, during the Paleoproterozoic metamorphism, kyanite formed paramorphoses after andalusite. The origin of the quartz-muscovite-andalusite schists of the Pellapahk deposit as altered and later metamorphosed volcanic rocks was first published by Glagolev [
51], who studied petrography of the Kolmozero–Voronya belt in early 1970s when the Cu-Mo mineralization was unknown.
Generally, the Pellapahk granite porphyry was Si-K altered, and Na, Mg, Ca, and Fe were partly removed from the rock (
Table 1). Sodium was taken away from the porphyry system, but Mg, Ca, and Fe were re-deposited in the zone of alteration of high-alumina gneiss in the mineral forms of gedrite and cordierite [
36].The zone of gedrite–cordierite alteration is 100–150 m thick and follows the contact with the altered granite porphyry (part of it is shown in
Figure 3).
The metamorphism of the mineralized rocks in the Pellapahk deposit can be confirmed by findings of multiphase grains with structures of sulfide melt crystallization, which in the Pellapahk deposit are not as frequent as in the Oleninskoe. Multiphase fine aggregates from the Pellapahk deposit consist of minerals of Pb, Ag, Bi, and Zn galena, argentotetrahedrite, lillianite [
45], or minerals of Cu, Sb, and As tetrahedrite and tennantite, löllingite, and chalcopyrite (
Figure 16). It is interesting to note formation of löllingite and the absence of arsenopyrite in the rocks with intense pyrite dissemination.
Other signs of metamorphism of the ore in the Pellapahk deposit are recrystallization of chalcopyrite with deposition along cleavage in kyanite, which replaces andalusite (
Figure 2 and
Figure 8), and recrystallization of molybdenite along cleavage in muscovite.
The fact that large amounts of pyrite are preserved within the Pellapahk deposit indicates that high f(S2) conditions must have prevailed during metamorphism.
Alteration processes in the Oleninskoe deposit differ from those in Pellapahk: we see here calcium alteration (diopsidization), potassic alteration (biotitization), and Si ± K, Na alteration (quartz-albite-muscovite, quartz-arsenopyrite-tourmaline, quartz metasomatites).
The following distinctive features show metamorphism of the mineralized rocks in the Oleninskoe deposit. First, there are numerous findings of multiphase sulfide grains with structures of sulfide melt crystallization [
45], described in
Section 4.1.2. Then, late metamorphism is indicated by the mineral composition of the altered rocks, where chlorite is absent, calcite is very rare, and actinolite-hornblende and diopside are abundant. Chlorite and carbonates are typical minerals (together with quartz) in altered amphibolite, but during amphibolite metamorphism, when H
2O and CO
2 are removed from the rocks, chlorite is replaced by amphiboles [
52,
53], and the content of carbonates reduces.
Then, pyrite in the Oleninskoe deposit is sporadic, and pyrrhotite is the most abundant sulfide mineral. This can be a result of metamorphism: pyrrhotite replaces pyrite under the conditions of amphibolite metamorphism [
53,
54].
The composition of the fluid inclusions in quartz varies depending on the character of rock alteration: in the Pellapahk deposit, the fluids are alkaline (Na, K) and SO42− rich, and in the Oleninskoe deposit, they are Ca-Mg-Cl dominant.
Mineralogical and geochemical features of the Oleninskoe deposit indicate its genesis with high oxidizing fluids, which could be generated by a magmatic source [
55]. The spatial and genetic relationship of mineralization with the sills of granite porphyry, the geochemical association of metals, an Au/Ag ratio of <0.2, and the multiplicity of silver mineralization with different Ag, Cu and Pb sulfosalts are all characteristics that enable the classification of the Oleninskoe deposit as a sub-epithermal deposit located in the vicinity of a big granite porphyry intrusion; the Pellapahk intrusion being the most probable. The geological–structural characteristics of the Oleninskoe deposit—its position in a shear zone, the morphology and size of ore bodies, the scale of the deposit, the intensity and zoning of host rocks alteration—do not oppose this model.
If the Oleninskoe and Pellapahk deposits are the parts of the Pellapahk–Oleninskoe porphyry-epithermal system, then the age of primary mineralization is close to the time of the formation of granite porphyry at 2.83–2.81 Ga. The deposits were later lower amphibolite metamorphosed together with the hosting volcanic-sedimentary rocks in the Neoarchean (T = 550–600 °C, P = 3–4 kBar) and in the Paleoproterozoic (T ~ 530 °C, P ~ 5.5 kBar) [
26], and the mineralized rocks demonstrate signs of metamorphism of the ore.
Mineral deposits, associated with granite porphyry intrusions and dykes, are well known in the Fennoscandian and other Precambrian shields around the world. In the Fennoscandian Shield, we can mention the Cu porphyry (with gold) deposit of Aitik in Norbotten, Sweden [
56], the molybdenum porphyry deposit ofLobash and neighboring gold deposit Lobash-1 in the Central Karelia [
57,
58], the minor gold deposits of Taloveis and Falaley in the Kostamuksha greenstone belt, Western Karelia [
59], Mo-W with gold occurrences of Yalonvaara and Hatunoya in Southern Karelia [
60], etc. The deposits and occurrences in Karelia formed not at the time of crystallization of the porphyry intrusions, but at the stage of the Paleoproterozoic (or rarer, Neoarchean) regional metamorphism [
61]. The geological setting, morphology and size of the ore bodies, geochemical characteristics, and mineralogy show these deposits belonging to the orogenic genetic class [
62]. In the Kolmozero–Voronya belt, the Nyalm-1 deposit is considered an orogenic gold deposit, associated with a granodiorite porphyry intrusion [
63,
64].
Some deposits in the Fennoscandian Shield are classified as metamorphosed epithermal: those are the gold deposit of Kutemajarvi in the Tampere belt in South Finland, and the silver (with base metals) deposit of Taivaljarvi in the Tipasjarvi belt in Central Finland.
The Kutemajarvi gold deposit comprises eight tube-like ore bodies, located 500 m south from the Pukala monzogranite–porhyry tonalite intrusion in the intermediate metavolcanics. The intrusion and the deposit are of the Paleoproterozoic age of 1.90–1.88 Ga [
65].
The Taivaljarvi is an Archean stratiform Ag-Zn-Pb deposit, consisting of four mineralized horizons formed by fluids of magmatic origin, which migrated along shear zones in felsic pyroclastic rocks (rhyolite tuffs) [
66]. The average gold content in the deposit is 0.29 g/t. The age of the rocks hosting the mineralization is 2.83–2.75 Ga [
66].
Thus, the Pellapahk–Oleninskoe porphyry-epithermal system is the oldest system with complex Cu-Mo and Au-Ag mineralization in the Fennoscandian Shield. Distinctive geochemical and mineralogical features distinguish the Oleninskoe deposit from all other gold deposits in Fennoscandia.
6. Conclusions
Gabbro-diorite-granodiorite-granite porphyry intrusions formed at the late stages of the formation of the volcanic-sedimentary sequences of the Kolmozero–Voronya greenstone belt. The age of the intrusions is 2.83–2.82 Ga. Cu-Mo, Au-Ag, and Au deposits are associated with the quartz porphyry series.
The Pellapahk Cu-Mo and the Oleninskoe Au-Ag deposits are considered two parts of the Pellapahk–Oleninskoe porphyry-epithermal system: the Cu-Mo deposit in a big granite porphyry intrusion makes its central part, and the gold-silver deposit is located in the flank where it is associated with granite porphyry sills.
The following distinctive features indicate the sub-epithermal origin of the Au-Ag mineralization in the Oleninskoe deposit: the spatial and genetic relationships with the sills of granite porphyry, the geochemical association of ore elements, an Au/Ag ratio of <0.2, and the multiplicity of silver mineralization with different Ag, Cu, Pb, and Sb sulfosalts. The geological–structural characteristics of the Oleninskoe deposit (i.e., its location in a shear zone, the morphology and size of ore bodies, the scale of the deposit, the intensity and zoning of host rocks alteration) do not oppose this model.
The Pellapahk–Oleninskoe porphyry-epithermal ore system is probably the oldest one in the Fennoscandian Shield. Mineralized rocks of the Pellapahk and Oleninskoe deposits were later lower amphibolite metamorphosed. An important sign of ore metamorphism is the formation of structures of crystallization of sulfide melt of the low-melting-point metals. In the Oleninskoe ores we see fine intergrowths of Ag, Cd, Pb, As, Sb, Te minerals galena, argentotetrahedrite, pyrargyrite, pyrrhotite, ullmannite, stutzite, etc. In the Pellapahk Cu-Mo deposit, multiphase fine aggregates consist of Bi, Pb, Sb, and As minerals. Other signs of metamorphism of the ore in the Pellapahk deposit are recrystallization of chalcopyrite with re-deposition along cleavage in kyanite, and recrystallization of molybdenite along cleavage in muscovite. Late metamorphism of the ore in the Oleninskoe deposit is indicated by the absence of chlorite and the scarcity of carbonate in altered amphibolite.