Next Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue “Bio-Geochemistry of Heavy Metals/Metalloids”
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Mid-Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy for Gemstone Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Properties of Fine-Grained Rock Waste from the Pilawa Gorna Amphibolite and Migmatite Aggregates Production Plant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gemological and Spectroscopic Characteristics of “Jedi” Spinel from Man Sin, Myanmar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gemological and Luminescence Characteristics of Taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar

1
Gemological Institute, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2
National Center for Quality Inspection and Testing of Gem & Gold-Silver Jewelry (Henan), Henan Institute of Product Quality Supervision and Inspection, Zhengzhou 450047, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(3), 346; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13030346
Submission received: 14 January 2023 / Revised: 11 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gemstone Analysis by Spectroscopy and Microscopy, Volume II)

Abstract

:
Taaffeite is a rare gem that has been found in different localities such as Tanzania, Sri Lanka, China, and Mogok, Myanmar. In this study, thirty-two taaffeite samples from Mogok, Myanmar, were investigated by conventional gemological testing, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), Raman spectrometry, and fluorescence spectrometry. Through microscopic observations, various types of inclusions were observed in these taaffeites, including irregular inclusions, orange and brown intrusions, black dotted and flake inclusions, healed fissures, tubular inclusions, fingerprint inclusions, and multi-phase inclusions. The Raman spectra demonstrated that the inclusions were mainly calcite, forsterite, celestite, graphite, dolomite, and transparent tubular or columnar inclusions filled with CO2. In previous studies, taaffeite showed inert or chalky fluorescence under long-wave ultraviolet (LWUV) light and inert fluorescence under short-wave ultraviolet (SWUV) light. In this study, the taaffeite samples revealed different fluorescence phenomena under ultraviolet light. Thirty-two taaffeite samples were classified into four categories according to their fluorescence under LWUV: orange-red, pink, green, and blue-white fluorescence. Under SWUV, all samples presented inert to bright pink fluorescence. Two-dimensional fluorescence spectra were obtained through a fluorescence spectrometer. For the samples with orange-red and pink fluorescence under LWUV, two-dimensional fluorescence spectra showed that peaks at 686 nm and 690 nm (in the red region) were strong. For the samples with green and blue-white fluorescence under LWUV, peaks at 439 nm and 464 nm (in the blue region) were strong, peaks at 507–515 nm (in the green region) were relatively weak, and peaks at 686 and 690 nm (in the red region) were very weak. Combined with the data from LA-ICP-MS, it is speculated that Cr3+ was responsible for samples having orange-red and pink fluorescence, that Mn2+ was responsible for samples having green fluorescence, and that Fe inhibited the generation of fluorescence.

1. Introduction

Taaffeite is one of the rarest gem species in the world. It is an oxide mineral with the chemical formula BeMg3Al8O16 that belongs to the hexagonal crystal family. Single crystals of taaffeite are usually hexagonal bipyramidal or barrel shaped, and their aggregation is granular.
Taaffeite belongs to the taaffeite group, which has three members: magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S, magnesiotaaffeite-6N’3S, and ferrotaaffeite-6N’3S [1]. Magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S is commonly known as taaffeite. The structure of taaffeite (magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S) is composed of two spinel modules (T2M4O8, marked as S) and two modified nolanite modules (BeTM4O8, marked as N’) [2].
The crystal structure of taaffeite is based on a close-packed oxygen framework and three types of cation layers: O, T1′, and T2. O–T2 represents a spinel module, and O–T1′ represents a modified nolanite module [3]. The whole structure of taaffeite can be defined as –OT2OT1′OT2OT1′– [4]. Figure 1 shows that the O layer has three octahedrons. In the T1′ layer, there are four octahedrons and two opposite tetrahedrons. The T2 layer has one octahedron and five tetrahedrons [3,5]. In taaffeite’s structure, element occupancies are complicated. Be2+ always occupies a tetrahedral site in a T1′ layer. Al3+ can occupy the octahedral sites in an O layer or a T2 layer and one of the tetrahedral sites in a T1′ layer. Mg2+ can be present in tetrahedral sites in a T2 layer and in octahedral sites in a T1′ layer [3]. In addition, trace element substitution exists in taaffeite. For example, Cr3+ often replaces Al3+ (in 6-coordination) [6]. Zn2+, Fe2+, and Sn2+ can replace Mg2+ (in 4-coordination) [3].
Taaffeite is reportedly produced in Tanzania, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and China [7,8,9,10,11]. According to previous studies, the refractive index of taaffeite is 1.715–1.735, and its specific gravity is 3.57–3.78 [7,8,9,10]. The inclusions in taaffeites from Sri Lanka are zircon, magnesite, feldspar, apatite, muscovite, spinel, phlogopite, fingerprint-like inclusions, healing fissures, and negative crystals with multi-phase inclusions [9,10,12,13]. Healed fissures are seen in taaffeite samples from Myanmar [7]. In general, taaffeite shows inert or chalky fluorescence under long-wave ultraviolet (LWUV) light and inert fluorescence under short-wave ultraviolet (SWUV) light [6,8,10,12].
The Mogok region is located in the middle of the Mogok metamorphic band, which is a significant origin area for gems [14,15,16]. Systematic research on the taaffeite from Mogok, Myanmar, is still lacking. In this study, thirty-two taaffeites from Mogok were collected. These taaffeite samples were discovered in Ohngaing mine, Mogok Valley, Mogok Township, Pyin-Oo-Lwin District, Mandalay Region, Myanmar. The principal rocks in Ohngaing are syenite, marble, and gneiss [17].
Gemological, luminescence, and chemical characteristic analyses were carried out through conventional gemological testing, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), Raman spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy. This study can enhance our understanding of taaffeite from Mogok and provide a new research basis for the gems’ characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Thirty-two taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar were selected for examination (Figure 2). All these samples are small, faceted gems with weights ranging from 0.04 g to 0.51 g. The samples were colorless to light pink with translucent and vitreous lusters due to abundant inclusions.

2.2. Methods

Photomicrographs of the inclusions in the samples were taken using a Leica DFC 550-Leica M205 A Microphotographic system in the Gemmological Institute of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan, China).
Raman spectra of all the inclusions in the samples were obtained using a HORIBA LabRAM HR Elolution spectrometer with the following parameters: 532 nm, 600 nm grating, 0–1500 cm−1 range. The spectra were collected in the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan, China).
The fluorescence emission spectra of all samples were obtained using a JASCO FP-8500 fluorescence spectrometer (JASCO, Ishikawamachi Hachioji-shi Tokyo, Japan) in the Gemmological Institute of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan, China). The following parameters were used: Ex bandwidth—5 mm, Em bandwidth—2.5 mm, PMT voltage—820 V/720 V (720 V only for samples 16 and 29 with the blue-white fluorescence under LWUV), and scan speed—1000 nm/min. The ultraviolet fluorescent lamp used in this study was tested using a Skyray UV100, and the LW and SW wavelengths were 369 nm and 254 nm, respectively. Therefore, 369 nm was chosen as the emission wavelength of the two-dimensional fluorescence spectra.
The chemical composition analysis was conducted using a GeoLasPro Agilent 7900a LA-ICP-MS at Wuhan Sample Solution Analytical Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China. The laser beam spot diameter was 44 µm with a frequency of 5 Hz and an intensity of 5.5 J/cm2. NIST 610, BHVO-2G, BCR-2G, and BIR-1G were used as calibration reference materials. After every six ablated points, the analysis was followed by a calibration of the instrument with NIST 610 in order to correct the time-dependent drift of sensitivity and mass discrimination. The raw data were processed by ICPMS Data Cal software, and the multi-external standards combined internal standard calibration strategy for oxide was used for quantitative calculations. Since the main elements of taaffeite are Be, Mg, Al, and O, Al was chosen as the internal normalizing element to calculate other elements.
Thirty-two samples were analyzed in two parts using LA-ICP-MS for a total of 47 points. In the first test, sample Nos. 2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32 were tested at two points, respectively. The element contents of the two points of one sample are similar. The remaining samples (Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22) were only tested at one point for analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Gemological Properties

Thirty-two taaffeite samples had a refractive index of 1.713–1.729 with a birefringence of between 0.001 and 0.006. Specific gravity varied from 3.578 to 3.686. These results are consistent with those of past studies on taaffeite [7,8,9,10].
These samples were observed and photographed under visible light and UV light (Figure 3). According to their fluorescence colors under LWUV light, the samples can be divided into four categories: the orange-red, pink, green, and blue-white fluorescence groups. All of them revealed inert to bright pink fluorescence under SWUV light.
Various inclusions were found in these taaffeites. The inclusions can be divided into five types: (1) transparent columnar and irregular inclusions (Figure 4a,b); (2) orange and brown intrusions, mostly filling in the fissures or healed fissures of the host crystal (Figure 4c,d); (3) black punctual and flake inclusions, which occur in large quantities in samples 14 and 16 and are mostly hexagonal plates (Figure 4e,f); (4) fissures and healed fissures (Figure 4g,h); (5) multi-phase inclusions, which are mostly transparent tubes containing black dots or irregular minerals (Figure 4i,j). The irregular inclusions are about 50 μm in length; tubular inclusions are 50–70 µm in length and about 60 µm in width; black inclusions are about 100 µm in length and 10–50 μm in width.

3.2. Identification of the Inclusions

The inclusions of the taaffeite samples were identified by Raman spectroscopy (Figure 5). In some spectra, the peaks at 416–417 cm−1, 436 cm−1, 489 cm−1, 706 cm−1, 715 cm−1, 763 cm−1, and 814 cm−1 are the Raman peaks of the host taaffeite [18].
The mineral inclusions of taaffeites were identified as calcite, forsterite, celestite, dolomite, and graphite. In addition, some transparent tubular or columnar inclusions were filled with CO2. Dolomite was frequently found in the spinel from Mogok, Myanmar [16]. Therefore, dolomite was inferred as a characteristic inclusion of spinel from Mogok, Myanmar. For taaffeite, dolomite may be a typical inclusion in this region, but it has never been found in other areas [8,9,13].
Multi-phase inclusions were found in some samples, which consist of black blocky or irregular crystals wrapped up with transparent columnar, tubular, or irregular crystals. Figure 6a shows a multi-phase inclusion in sample 2, with four black crystals wrapped in an irregular transparent inclusion. Raman spectroscopy indicated that the transparent inclusion was filled with CO2, while the black inclusions on the right were pyrite. Figure 6b shows another multi-phase inclusion in sample 2, and the transparent tubular inclusion was composed of four different phases. The left part of the multi-phase inclusion was celestite, and the right part is calcite. In the middle, a black pyrite coexists with CO2.
In the taaffeite samples, large amounts of carbonates, i.e., calcite and dolomite, were found. These minerals were also found in Mogok spinels that were produced in the carbonate metamorphic rock [16]. It can be presumed that taaffeite from Mogok was generated in carbonate metamorphic rock.

3.3. Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Mineral luminescence should satisfy the following conditions simultaneously: (1) a lattice type suitable for the formation of emission centers; (2) some fluorescence-producing elements; (3) a relatively small number of quenchants [19]. Transition metal elements are one of the important factors of mineral luminescence. For example, Mn2+ is the most popular luminescence agent in nature, and Fe3+ is a commonly known quenchant [20]. The red fluorescence in minerals, such as ruby and spinel, is mainly caused by Cr3+ [21,22]. Therefore, in this study, the contents of the common transition metal elements (Cr, Ti, V, Mn, and Fe) are compared with the fluorescence color and intensity of taaffeites to analyze their correlation.

3.3.1. Orange-Red and Pink Fluorescence Group under LWUV

Figure 7a shows the two-dimensional fluorescence spectra of samples with orange-red fluorescence under LWUV (No. 8, 10, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, and 32). The red region was magnified for better analysis (on the left side of Figure 7a).
The fluorescence peaks at 686 nm and 690 nm in the red region are prominent. Combined with two-dimensional fluorescence spectra and the fluorescence image (Figure 3), the samples with apparent orange-red fluorescence under LWUV have strong peaks in the red region (No. 10, 26, and 25). Correspondingly, samples with less obvious fluorescence have weaker peaks (No. 30 and 32).
In Table 1, the trace element data obtained from LA-ICP-MS were analyzed and discussed. Among the samples with orange-red fluorescence under LWUV, samples 10 and 31 have moderate contents of Cr (32.1 ppmw and 43.9 ppmw). However, the contents of Fe, which are 2822 ppmw and 4554 ppmw, are distinctly different. Correspondingly, sample 10 had the strongest and sample 31 had the weak fluorescence (Figure 3). In addition, sample 26 had the highest content of Cr (109 ppmw) and a higher Fe content (3815 ppmw) and weaker fluorescence intensity than sample 10. Therefore, Fe can restrain the production of fluorescence, and taaffeite with high Fe content should have weak fluorescence intensity. For instance, samples 24, 30 and 32 had relatively high contents of Fe (4766 ppmw, 4993 ppmw, and 5098 ppmw, respectively), and their fluorescences were weak. Overall, these results demonstrate that Cr is the activator of orange-red fluorescence in taaffeite under LWUV and that Fe is a powerful quenchant of fluorescence.
Figure 7b shows the two-dimensional fluorescence spectra of the samples with pink fluorescence under LWUV (No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 27, and 28). They also have two prominent peaks (686 nm and 690 nm) in the red region. The peak positions are consistent with the samples with orange-red fluorescence. Compared with the fluorescence intensity and peaks in the two-dimensional fluorescence spectra of the samples with pink fluorescence, there exists a similar relationship with the orange-red fluorescence group. Moreover, Cr3+ is the activator of the orange-red fluorescence under LWUV, it is speculated that Cr3+ can also cause pink fluorescence in taaffeite under LWUV, and Fe inhibits fluorescence generation.
It should be mentioned that the contents of Cr in samples 20, 27, and 28 are lower than the detection limits, which corresponds with their weak fluorescence (under LWUV). Moreover, since LA-ICP-MS is a destructive testing method and taaffeite is valuable, these samples were only tested at one or two points, which can also affect the results.

3.3.2. Green Fluorescence Group under LWUV

On the right side of Figure 3, the samples presented green fluorescence under LWUV (No. 6, 15, 18, 19, 21, 22, and 23). The fluorescence peaks (Figure 7c) at 439 nm and 464 nm in the blue region are evident in the two-dimensional fluorescence spectra. A peak at 511–515 nm exists in the green region. Additionally, two weak peaks at 686 nm and 690 nm can be observed in the red region.
Table 2 shows the LA-ICP-MS results of the samples with green fluorescence under LWUV. They have similar elemental contents of Mn (91.3–138 ppmw). Mn2+ is one of the important causes of mineral fluorescence [20]. It is responsible for the green, yellow, and orange-red luminescence in minerals, and the fluorescence color is related to the position of Mn2+ in the crystal structure [19]. For example, the green emission of spinel is connected with Mn2+ in the tetrahedral site [23]. Willemite can also emit green fluorescence, which is caused by Mn2+ that occupies the tetrahedral site [20,24]. In the structure of taaffeite, Mg2+ occupies the tetrahedral position. Due to the same valence and similar ionic radii of Mg2+ and Mn2+ (0.57 and 0.66 Å, respectively, in 4-coordination) [25], Mn2+ is most likely located in the tetrahedral position in taaffeite. Considering the correlation between ionic position and fluorescence color, it can be speculated that a relationship exists between Mn2+ and green fluorescence under LWUV. However, the influence of other trace elements cannot be excluded, and it may be caused by a combination of them.

3.3.3. Blue-white Fluorescence Group under LWUV

Samples 16 and 29 show the blue-white fluorescence under LWUV (Figure 3). In Figure 7d, the two-dimensional fluorescence spectra have prominent peaks at 439 nm and 464 nm in the blue region, a relatively weak peak at 507 nm for sample 16 and 511 nm for sample 29 in the green region, and two very weak peaks at 686 nm and 690 nm in the red region for both samples. By comparison, the sample with relatively intense blue-white fluorescence under LWUV (No. 16) has stronger peaks in the fluorescence spectrum.
As is shown in Table 3, two taaffeite samples with blue-white fluorescence under LWUV show a considerable difference in their Fe contents at 1910 ppmw and 3293 ppmw, respectively. The other trace elements are also similar. Since only two taaffeite samples presented blue-white fluorescence under LWUV, the number of samples was too limited to analyze the correlation between trace element contents, fluorescence color, and fluorescence intensity. Moreover, there is no theoretical support; the reason for the blue-white fluorescence generation is not known, and thus further investigation is needed. However, the comparison still indicates that the presence of Fe inhibits the fluorescence in some way.

4. Conclusions

This work provides information on taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar, including standard gemological data, images, and Raman spectra of the inclusions, luminescence characteristics, fluorescence spectra features, and trace element data from LA-ICP-MS.
The refractive index of taaffeite samples from Mogok, Myanmar, ranges from 1.713 to 1.729, with the birefringence ranging from 0.001 to 0.006 and the specific gravity ranging from 3.578 to 3.686. These results are consistent with the physical and optical properties of taaffeites from other origins.
The examined taaffeite samples have various internal features, and many of them are distinguished from taaffeites of other origins. The visible inclusions contain irregular inclusions, orange and brown intrusions, black dots and flakes, healed fissures, and tubular and fingerprint inclusions. The mineral inclusions include calcite, forsterite, celestite, dolomite, and graphite. Dolomite is regarded as the characteristic inclusion of taaffeite from Mogok, Myanmar. Large amounts of carbonates indicate that these taaffeites formed in a carbonate metamorphic environment. In addition, CO2 was also found in these taaffeites.
Taaffeites have specific characteristic fluorescence. The fluorescence colors under LWUV can be divided into four categories: orange-red, pink, green, and blue-white. Using two-dimensional fluorescence spectra, it was found that the samples with orange-red and pink fluorescence had two very strong peaks at 686 nm and 690 nm in the red region. Samples showing green and blue-white fluorescence had strong peaks at 439 nm and 464 nm in the blue region, a relatively weak peak in the green region, and two very weak peaks at 686 nm and 690 nm in the red region. When combined with the chemical composition data from LA-ICP-MS, this suggests that Cr3+ is the activator of the orange-red and pink fluorescence, Mn2+ is responsible for the green fluorescence, and Fe inhibits the generation of fluorescence.

Author Contributions

Investigation, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, Q.Z., B.L., X.L. (Xingtong Li) and X.L. (Xiaojing Lai). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant (No. 42002041) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (No.162301202618) to Xiaojing Lai.

Data Availability Statement

All supporting data and computational details are available on written request. These data are stored by the main author of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the mineral collector Xiaokang Xiong for providing us with the taaffeite samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mills, S.J.; Hatert, F.; Nickel, E.H.; Ferraris, G. The Standardisation of Mineral Group Hierarchies: Application to Recent Nomenclature Proposals. Eur. J. Mineral. 2009, 21, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Armbruster, T. Revised Nomenclature of Hogbomite, Nigerite, and Taaffeite Minerals. Eur. J. Mineral. 2002, 14, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yang, Z.; Ding, K.; De Fourestier, J.; Mao, Q.; Li, H. Ferrotaaffeite-2N’2S, a New Mineral Species, and the Crystal Structure of Fe2+-Rich Magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S from the Xianghualing Tin-Polymetallic Ore Field, Hunan Province, China. Can. Mineral. 2012, 50, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Q. The Principle of Constructing the Crystal Structures of Nigerite-Taaffeite-Hogbomite and their Related Minerals. Acta Mineral. Sin. 2001, 01, 19–26. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Gatehouse, B.M.; Grey, I.E. The Crystal Structure of Höegbomite-8H. Am. Mineral. 1982, 67, 373–380. [Google Scholar]
  6. Malcherek, T.; Schluter, J. Crystal Structure of Cr-bearing Mg3BeAl8O16, a New Polytype of Magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Crystallogr. Commun. 2016, 72, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Leelawatanasuk, T.; Atichat, W.; Thye Sun, T.; Sriprasert, B.; Jakkawanvibul, J. Some Characteristics of Taaffeite from Myanmar. J. Gemmol. 2014, 34, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schmetzer, K.; Krzemnicki, M.; Hänni, H.A.; Bernhardt, H.-J.; Pettke, T. Gem-quality Taaffeites and Musgravites from Africa. J. Gemmol. 2007, 30, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schmetzer, K.; Kiefert, L.; Bernhardt, H.-J.; Burford, M.; Gunasekara, D.P. Iron- and Zinc-rich Gem-quality Taaffeites from Sri Lanka. J. Gemmol. 2005, 29, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schmetzer, K.; Kiefert, L.; Bernhardt, H.-J. Purple to Purplish Red Chromium-bearing Taaffeites. Gems Gemol. 2000, 36, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, Z.; Wang, K. The Crystal Structure of Taaffeite. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1963, 14, 70–71. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmetzer, K.; Kiefert, L.; Bernhardt, H.-J.; Burford, M. Two Remarkable Taaffeite Crystals from Sri Lanka. J. Gemmol. 2005, 29, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gunawardene, M. Inclusions in Taaffeites from Sri Lanka. Gems Gemol. 1984, 20, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zaw, K.; Sutherland, L.; Yui, T.-F.; Meffre, S.; Thu, K. Vanadium-rich ruby and sapphire within Mogok Gemfield, Myanmar: Implications for gem color and genesis. Miner. Depos. 2014, 50, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malíčková, I.; Bačík, P.; Fridrichová, J.; Hanus, R.; Illášová, Ľ.; Štubňa, J.; Furka, D.; Furka, S.; Škoda, R. Optical and Luminescence Spectroscopy of Varicolored Gem Spinel from Mogok, Myanmar and Lục Yên, Vietnam. Minerals 2021, 11, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Phyo, M.M.; Bieler, E.; Franz, L.; Balmer, W.; Krzemnicki, M.S. Spinel from Mogok, Myanmar—A Detailed Inclusion Study by Raman Microspectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy. J. Gemmol. 2019, 36, 418–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Themelis, T. Gems & Mines of Mogok: Fascinating Glimpses into the Gemology, Geology and Gem Mining of Mogok, Myanmar (Burma); A&T Publishers: Anchorage, AK, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiefert, L.; Schmetzer, K. Distinction of Taaffeite and Musgravite. J. Gemmol. 1998, 26, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gaft, M.; Reisfeld, R.; Panczer, G. Modern Luminescence Spectroscopy of Minerals and Materials; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. Marfunin, A.D.S. Spectroscopy, Luminescence and Radiation Centers in Minerals; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeug, M.; Nasdala, L.; Chanmuang, N.C.; Hauzenberger, C. Gem Topaz from the Schneckenstein Crag, Saxony, Germany: Mineralogical Characterization and Luminescence. Gems Gemol. 2022, 58, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, C.; Shen, A.H.; Liu, Y. Characterization of Order-Disorder Transition in MgAl2O4: Cr3+ Spinel using Photoluminescence. J. Lumin. 2020, 227, 117552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohler, R.L.; White, W.B. Influence of Structural Order on the Luminescence of Oxide Spinels: Manganese Activated Spinels. Mater. Res. Bull. 1994, 29, 1109–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lojpur, V.; Nikolić, M.G.; Jovanović, D.; Medić, M.; Antić, Ž.; Dramićanin, M.D. Luminescence Thermometry with Zn2SiO4: Mn2+ powder. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 141912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Polyhedral representation of the magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S crystal structure. The pink and green tetrahedrons in the T1′ layers have opposite directions, and the same goes for the orange and purple tetrahedrons in the T2 layers.
Figure 1. Polyhedral representation of the magnesiotaaffeite-2N’2S crystal structure. The pink and green tetrahedrons in the T1′ layers have opposite directions, and the same goes for the orange and purple tetrahedrons in the T2 layers.
Minerals 13 00346 g001
Figure 2. Thirty-two taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar.
Figure 2. Thirty-two taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar.
Minerals 13 00346 g002
Figure 3. Thirty-two taaffeite samples show different fluorescence under LWUV and SWUV.
Figure 3. Thirty-two taaffeite samples show different fluorescence under LWUV and SWUV.
Minerals 13 00346 g003
Figure 4. The inclusions in taaffeite samples. (a,b) irregular inclusions; (c,d) orange and brown intrusions; (e,f) black punctual and flake inclusions; (g,h) healed fissures; (i,j) multi-phase inclusions; (k,l) fingerprint-like inclusions (gas-liquid inclusions in healed fissures).
Figure 4. The inclusions in taaffeite samples. (a,b) irregular inclusions; (c,d) orange and brown intrusions; (e,f) black punctual and flake inclusions; (g,h) healed fissures; (i,j) multi-phase inclusions; (k,l) fingerprint-like inclusions (gas-liquid inclusions in healed fissures).
Minerals 13 00346 g004
Figure 5. The Raman spectra of inclusions in taaffeite samples. (a) calcite; (b) forsterite; (c) celestite; (d) graphite; (e) dolomite; (f) CO2. Subfigures in each figures indicated the Raman test locations.
Figure 5. The Raman spectra of inclusions in taaffeite samples. (a) calcite; (b) forsterite; (c) celestite; (d) graphite; (e) dolomite; (f) CO2. Subfigures in each figures indicated the Raman test locations.
Minerals 13 00346 g005
Figure 6. (a,b) Two multi-phase inclusions in sample 2 and their corresponding Raman spectra (the numbers marked as gray are the Raman peaks of the host taaffeite).
Figure 6. (a,b) Two multi-phase inclusions in sample 2 and their corresponding Raman spectra (the numbers marked as gray are the Raman peaks of the host taaffeite).
Minerals 13 00346 g006
Figure 7. Two-dimensional fluorescence spectra of taaffeites using 369 nm excitation. (a) Samples with orange-red fluorescence under LWUV. The red region of fluorescence spectra had been enlarged for better analysis, which placed on the left side. (b) Samples with pink fluorescence under LWUV. The red region of fluorescence spectra had been enlarged for better analysis, which placed on the left side. (c) Samples with green fluorescence under LWUV. (d) Samples with blue-white fluorescence under LWUV.
Figure 7. Two-dimensional fluorescence spectra of taaffeites using 369 nm excitation. (a) Samples with orange-red fluorescence under LWUV. The red region of fluorescence spectra had been enlarged for better analysis, which placed on the left side. (b) Samples with pink fluorescence under LWUV. The red region of fluorescence spectra had been enlarged for better analysis, which placed on the left side. (c) Samples with green fluorescence under LWUV. (d) Samples with blue-white fluorescence under LWUV.
Minerals 13 00346 g007
Table 1. Contents of trace elements in samples with orange-red and pink fluorescence under LWUV (ppmw).
Table 1. Contents of trace elements in samples with orange-red and pink fluorescence under LWUV (ppmw).
SampleCrVTiMnFeColor under LWUV
1032.19.836.0927.02822Orange-red
2610911839.91283815
2577.237.413.449.52826
3143.929.66.591274554
816.820.43.2654.02405
241937.48.171424766
3021.324.113.01024993
3221.115.615.91165098
Detection
Limits
10.70.430.795.3291.2
1334.38.335.4435.92399Pink
334.811.26.9426.02380
133.120.53.5367.94437
219.610.57.2131.82624
1123.629.66.3150.83166
1445.129.96.411314777
1218.27.776.5131.32810
430.010.64.0627.62508
921.829.94.5461.03320
529.830.838.885.74128
1719.926.75.4854.03684
711.427.25.9659.13569
27bdl11.47.4326.81675
28bdl18.36.8345.52531
20bdl34.911.444.32658
Detection
Limits
11.20.301.214.2981.4
bdl: below detection limit.
Table 2. Contents of trace elements in samples with green fluorescence under LWUV (ppmw).
Table 2. Contents of trace elements in samples with green fluorescence under LWUV (ppmw).
SampleMnVTiCrFe
2211421.111.115.24019
1510917.18.58bdl4436
1910815.17.76bdl5409
613815.69.16bdl4137
1895.012.011.1bdl4197
2191.312.713.8bdl4271
2310716.78.23bdl4551
Detection
Limits
4.290.301.2111.281.4
bdl: below detection limit.
Table 3. Contents of trace elements in samples with blue-white fluorescence under LWUV (ppmw).
Table 3. Contents of trace elements in samples with blue-white fluorescence under LWUV (ppmw).
SampleMnVTiCrFe
1697.824.17.6417.21910
2910348.79.77bdl3293
Detection
Limits
6.240.512.2414.894.7
bdl: below detection limit.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Lai, X.; Zhang, Q. Gemological and Luminescence Characteristics of Taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar. Minerals 2023, 13, 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13030346

AMA Style

Lin B, Li X, Zhang L, Lai X, Zhang Q. Gemological and Luminescence Characteristics of Taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar. Minerals. 2023; 13(3):346. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13030346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Bihan, Xingtong Li, Longbo Zhang, Xiaojing Lai, and Qian Zhang. 2023. "Gemological and Luminescence Characteristics of Taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar" Minerals 13, no. 3: 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13030346

APA Style

Lin, B., Li, X., Zhang, L., Lai, X., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Gemological and Luminescence Characteristics of Taaffeites from Mogok, Myanmar. Minerals, 13(3), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13030346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop