Next Article in Journal
Neuron–Oligodendrocyte Communication in Myelination of Cortical GABAergic Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial DNA Analysis Clarifies Taxonomic Status of the Northernmost Snow Sheep (Ovis nivicola) Population
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Factors Affecting the Functional Integrity of Male Reproduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chronological Incongruences between Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies of Aedes Mosquitoes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mitochondrial Genome of a Plant Fungal Pathogen Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Mycosphaerellaceae), Comparative Analysis and Diversification Times of the Sigatoka Disease Complex Using Fossil Calibrated Phylogenies

by
Juliana E. Arcila-Galvis
1,
Rafael E. Arango
2,3,
Javier M. Torres-Bonilla
2,3,4 and
Tatiana Arias
1,*,†
1
Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas, Comparative Biology Laboratory, Cra 72A Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
2
Escuela de Biociencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Medellín, Cl 59A Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
3
Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas, Plant Biotechnology Unit, Cra 72A Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
4
Colegio Mayor de Antioquia, Grupo Biociencias, Cra 78 Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Tecnológico de Antioquia, Cl 78B Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Life 2021, 11(3), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030215
Submission received: 20 January 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2021 / Accepted: 8 February 2021 / Published: 9 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Phylogenetics and Mitochondrial Evolution)

Abstract

:
Mycosphaerellaceae is a highly diverse fungal family containing a variety of pathogens affecting many economically important crops. Mitochondria play a crucial role in fungal metabolism and in the study of fungal evolution. This study aims to: (i) describe the mitochondrial genome of Pseudocercospora fijiensis, and (ii) compare it with closely related species (Sphaerulina musiva, S. populicola, P. musae and P. eumusae) available online, paying particular attention to the Sigatoka disease’s complex causal agents. The mitochondrial genome of P. fijiensis is a circular molecule of 74,089 bp containing typical genes coding for the 14 proteins related to oxidative phosphorylation, 2 rRNA genes and a set of 38 tRNAs. P. fijiensis mitogenome has two truncated cox1 copies, and bicistronic transcription of nad2-nad3 and atp6-atp8 confirmed experimentally. Comparative analysis revealed high variability in size and gene order among selected Mycosphaerellaceae mitogenomes likely to be due to rearrangements caused by mobile intron invasion. Using fossil calibrated Bayesian phylogenies, we found later diversification times for Mycosphaerellaceae (66.6 MYA) and the Sigatoka disease complex causal agents, compared to previous strict molecular clock studies. An early divergent Pseudocercospora fijiensis split from the sister species P. musae + P. eumusae 13.31 MYA while their sister group, the sister species P. eumusae and P. musae, split from their shared common ancestor in the late Miocene 8.22 MYA. This newly dated phylogeny suggests that species belonging to the Sigatoka disease complex originated after wild relatives of domesticated bananas (section Eumusae; 27.9 MYA). During this time frame, mitochondrial genomes expanded significantly, possibly due to invasions of introns into different electron transport chain genes.

1. Introduction

Mycosphaerellaceae is a highly diverse fungal family containing endophytes, saprobes, epiphytes, fungicolous and phytopathogenic species in more than 56 genera [1,2]. Family members can cause significant economic losses to a large number of important plants including ornamentals, food crops and commercially propagated trees [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Three Mycosphaerellaceae members, Pseudocercospora eumusae, P. fijiensis, and P. musae, [1] are major pathogens of bananas and plantains. They comprise the so-called Sigatoka disease complex which is responsible for one of the most economically destructive diseases for banana growers [9,10]. Diseases caused by these three pathogens induce plant physiological alterations including a reduction in photosynthetic capacity, crop yield, and fruit quality [9]. The Sigatoka disease complex causal agents form a robust clade, with P. fijiensis diverging earlier (39.9–30.6 MYA) than sister species P. eumusae and P. musae (22.6–17.4 MYA) [10,11,12]. Among them, Pseudocercospora fijiensis (teleomorph Mycosphaerella fijiensis) is the causal agent of black leaf streak disease (BLSD; aka Black Leaf Spot Disease), one the most damaging and costly diseases for banana and plantain worldwide [13].
Fungal mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) are circular or linear, usually AT enriched and range in size from 1.1 kb (Spizellomyces punctatus) [14] to 272 kb (Morchella importuna) [15]. Their size variation is mostly due to the presence or absence of accessory genes including RNA and DNA polymerases, reverse transcriptases and transposases, mobile introns, and size variation in intergenic regions [16,17]. In spite of the variation in size, their core gene content is largely conserved, even though their relative gene order is highly variable, both between and within the major fungal phyla [18,19,20]. Mitogenomes have introns and intronic open reading frames (ORFs) classified as group I and group II introns, which differ in their sequence, structure and splicing mechanisms [16,21,22,23,24,25]. Typically, group-II introns contain ORFs that code for reverse-transcriptase-like proteins. In contrast, group-I introns encode proteins with maturase and/or endonuclease activity [16]. Because of the limited comparative analysis of complete fungal mitogenome sequences, it has been difficult to estimate the timeframes and molecular evolution associated with mitochondrial genes or genomes [26].
Mitochondria have proven to be useful in evolutionary biology and systematics because they contain their own genome capable of independent replication, uniparental inheritance [27], near absence of genetic recombination, and uniform genetic backgrounds for some species [28]. Attempts to determine a time frame for fungal evolution are hampered by the lack of reliable fossil records. Hence, so far studies have focused on relating rates of DNA base substitutions and molecular clocks [29], based on the assumption that mutation rates of nuclear genes are similar to their counterparts in organisms with datable fossils [19]. Mitochondria plays a major role in fungal metabolism and fungicide resistance but until now only two annotated mitogenomes have been published in Mycosphaerellaceae (Zasmidium cellare and Zymoseptoria tritici) [30,31]. Sigatoka disease comparative mitogenome studies will provide answers on the evolution and adaptation of these plant pathogenic fungi.
This study aimed to: (i) sequence and characterize the complete mitogenome of Pseudocercospora fijiensis; (ii) compare mitogenomes of P. fijiensis with closely related species P. eumusae, and P. musae (causal agents of Sigatoka), and species with publicly available high throughput data such as Sphaerulina musiva and S. populicola (causal agents of leaf spot and canker diseases in poplar); and (iii) estimate timeframes and mitochondrial molecular evolution using fossil records to calibrate the Sigatoka disease complex phylogeny. We found that in mitogenomes analyzed herein, there were differences in content of free-standing and intronic Homing Endonuclease Genes (HEGs), genes coding for hypothetical proteins, and accessory genes such as DNA/RNA polymerases, reverse transcriptases and transposases. This work contributes to the understanding of mitogenome organization in Mycospharellaceae. In addition, new fossil calibrations for the Sigatoka’s complex species and mitochondrial comparative analysis aid in our understanding of the tempo and mode of evolution of these plant fungal pathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strain, DNA Extraction, and Library Construction and Sequencing

P. fijiensis isolate 081022 was obtained from naturally infected banana leaves coming from a commercial plantation located in Carepa, Antioquia, Colombia. Taxonomic affiliation has been confirmed based on both morphological criteria and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) [32]. For DNA extraction mycelia from 7-day old culture were transferred to potato dextrose broth and incubated for 5–7 days at room temperature in a rotary shaker. Then, mycelia were harvested from the liquid using vacuum filtration. Total DNA was extracted using a previously described Cetyl Trimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) method [33]. DNA quality and quantity were measured using a fluorometer (Qubit 3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Furthermore, genomic DNA was visualized on 1% agarose gel to check for any break/smear or multiple bands. Library construction was performed using Illumina platform with TruSeq DNA kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to acquire as paired-end 2 × 150-bps, with about a 350-bp insert size. Next-generation sequencing was performed by an external service (North Carolina University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) Hiseq 2500 system®.

2.2. Sequence Sources, Data Filtering and Assemblies

Eleven mitochondrial genome (mitogenomes) sequences were used for this study. Seven belonging to Mycosphaerellaceae: Pseudocercospora fijiensis (syn. Mycosphaerella fijiensis), Pseudocercospora eumusae (syn. Mycosphaerella eumusae), Pseudocercospora musae (syn. Mycosphaerella musicola), Sphaerulina musiva (syn. Septoria musiva), Sphaerulina populicola (syn. Septoria populicola), Zasmidium cellare, and Zymoseptoria tritici (syn. Mycosphaerella graminicola). One species is from Capnodiales: Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica and three are from Pleosporales, the sister group of Capnodiales: Didymella pinodes (syn. Mycosphaerella pinodes), Parastagonospora nodorum (syn. Phaeosphaeria nodorum), and Shiraia bambusicola (Table S1). Mitogenomes were obtained either from our own sequencing data, or sequence data available at GenBank [34], RefSeq [35] or MycoCosm [36]. Authors, seq ID and databases are listed in Table S1.
Read quality was assessed using FastQC v. 0.11.5 [37] for the P. fijiensis isolate 081022 raw reads recovered here. Low-quality reads and/or bases were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.36 [38]. First, we de novo assembled whole DNA using Spades 3.9.0 (parameter “-careful”) [39] at different k-mer sizes (k = 61, 71, 81, and 91). The assembly with the highest N50 and assembly size was scaffolded by SSPACE version 3.0 [40]. Remaining gaps between scaffolds were closed using GapFiller version 1.10 [41] and a final genome assembly was evaluated by REAPR version 1.0.18 [42]. Scaffolds from the whole genome sequencing assembly were mapped to a draft and an unpublished P. fijiensis mitogenome available in MycoCosm [36] using Geneious 9.1.5 [43]. Mitogenomes were also filtered from de novo whole-genome assemblies for Pseudocercospora musae and P. eumusae available online [8,10]. To separate mitochondrial contigs or scaffolds from the nuclear contigs or scaffolds, we used BLASTn [44] and the Electron Transport Chain Conserved Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes (CMPCGs) compiled from published mitogenomes of Zasmidium cellare, Zymoseptoria tritici, Didymela pinodes, Phaeosphaeria nodorum and Sharaia bambusicola as queries [30,31,45,46].
Even though the Sphaerulina musiva mitogenome was available online [8] we reassembled it using raw reads available at NCBI (SRA: SRR3927043). Our major motivation was a 9322 bp inversion detected around the 10,000 bp position of this mitogenome. This inversion was splitting the gene nad2 and we wanted to make sure this inversion was present in the S. musiva mitogenome. First, raw reads were filtered using BBtools (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/ (accessed on 10 February 2021)) in Geneious 9.1.5 [43]. Then, MITObim version 1.8 [47] used cox1 as bait to map all filtered reads that partly or fully overlap with the bait. Eventually, this leads to an extension of the reference sequence and a reduction of gaps until completion of the whole mitogenome [47]. This inversion in the Sphaerulina musiva mitogenome was found to be an artifact after reassembling raw reads.
Annotated mitochondrial genomes filtered from whole-genome assembly projects for Pseudocercospora musae and P. eumusae or reassembled for Sphaerulina musiva are available in Figshare (dataset: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101058.v1 (accessed on 10 February 2021)).

2.3. Annotation

Mitochondrial genomes of Pseudocercospora fijiensis, P. eumusae, P. musae, Sphaerulina populicola, S. musiva and Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica were annotated in this study using a combination of software. First, predicted ORFs were determined with a translation code for “mold mitochondrial genomes” using Geneious 9.1.5 [43]. Second, genes were identified using BLASTP version 2.4.0 [48] against the non-redundant protein database from NCBI (downloaded August and December 2016); genes were also identified using MITOS [49]. Third, protein domains and sequence patterns were searched with PFAM [50] and PANTHER 11.0 [51]. Additionally, mitogenome annotation was performed using multiple alignments among the fourteen CMPCGs using MUSCLE version 3.8.31 [52] and CLUSTAL W version 2.0 [53]. Inconsistencies regarding length and position of genes was solved paying particular attention to start and stop codons. Identified ORFs larger than 300 bp with start and stop codons that did not show results with the above-mentioned annotation strategies were considered as hypothetical proteins. Circular mitogenome maps were constructed using Geneious 9.1.5. and Geneious prime [43].

2.4. PCR Amplification of cox1 Gene Copies in P. fijiensis

A PCR assay was performed to confirm the presence of two different cox1 copies: a truncated copy (cox1_1) and a complete cox1 copy with an intron (cox1_2). Primers were designed to amplify regions between the first copy (cox1_1) and the second (cox1_2), including the exons of this last copy. First, a set of primers encompassed cox1_2 exon1 and cox1_2 exon 2. A second pair of primers encompassed cox1_1 and cox1_2 exon 2. PCR amplifications were carried out in a total volume of 10 μL, containing 20 ng genomic DNA, 0.15 μM of each primer, 1× PCR buffer (without MgCl2), 0.75 mM MgCl2, 4 μM of each dNTP and 0.65 U recombinant Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Cycling parameters were: 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at a 50 to 60 °C temperature gradient to determine annealing temperature, 1 min at 72 °C, and a final elongation step of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized with GelRed® (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA) under UV light.

2.5. Transcriptome de novo Assembly

RNA-seq raw reads of S. musiva (SRR1652271) and P. fijiensis (SRR3593877, SRR3593879) were downloaded from the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL EBI) database. Reads were quality filtered and trimmed using BBDuck from BBtools (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/ (accessed on 10 February 2021)) before carrying out transcriptome de novo assemblies with Trinity version 2.3.1 [54]. The P. eumusae (GDIK00000000.1) and P. musae assembled transcriptomes (GDIN00000000.1) were also downloaded from GeneBank. RNA-seq Geneious 9.1.5. plugins were used to map the assembled transcripts to mitogenomes of either S. musiva, P. fijiensis, P. eumusae or P. musae paying particular attention to gene pairs atp6-atp8, nad2-nad3.

2.6. RT–PCR Assays for Mitochondrial Gene Pairs of P. fijiensis

Total RNA was extracted from P. fijiensis (isolate: 081022) mycelium after fifteen days of culture using TRIzol® (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were measured at 260 nm using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Thermo Fisher). DNAse I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for cDNA synthesis from RNA as template for amplification using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primers were designed such that the amplified product encompassed the end of one gene and the beginning of another. We used pairs of NADH-Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Chain 3 and 2 (nad3-nad2) and mitochondrial encoded ATP Synthase Membrane Subunits 6 and 8 (atp8-atp6). Both genes and their intergenic sequences were partially amplified. PCR products were run in a 1% agarose gel electrophoresis purified using the GFX PCR DNA and gel band purification kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Purified PCR products were sequenced using Sanger Technology at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). All sequences are available in GeneBank: atp6-atp8 cDNA (GenBank: MN171334); atp6-atp8 DNA (GenBank: MN171335); nad2-nad3 DNA (GenBank: MN171336); nad2-nad3 cDNA (GenBank: MN171337); cob DNA (GenBank: MN171338); cob cDNA (GenBank: MN171339); nad5 cDNA (GenBank: MN171340).

2.7. Identification of Repetitive Elements

Repetitive sequences in mitogenomes of Mycosphaerellaceae were identified and annotated using Geneious Primer Tandem Repeats Finder and using a minimum repeat length of 100, excluding repeats up to 10 bp longer [43]. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and loci were identified using the MicroSAtellite Identification tool (MISA) [55] (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101013 (accessed on 10 February 2021)).

2.8. Phylogenetic Analysis and Divergence Times Estimates

Until now, only nuclear markers and strict clock calibration have been used to calculate diversification times for the Sigatoka disease complex species. We aimed to compare these analyses with fossil calibrated Bayesian phylogenies and mitochondrial markers. A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed to calculate diversification times. Since most mitogenomes are uniparentally inherited we used our mitochondrial phylogeny to compare topologies with already published nuclear ones for the Sigatoka disease complex species. Didymella pinodes [56], Pseudovirgaria hyperparasítica [57], Phaeosphaeria nodorum [45] and Shiraia bambusicola [46] were used as outgroups. Ten core mitochondrial genes (cox1, cox3, atp6, cob, nad1, nad2, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6) were aligned one by one for all species using CLUSTAL W version 2.0 [53]. Then, all aligned genes were concatenated in a single alignment for phylogenetic reconstruction. Cox2, atp8, atp9 and nad3 were excluded from the alignment either because they could not be fully recovered in P. musae (atp9, nad3) or because they were missing in outgroups S. bambusicola (atp8 atp9), P. nodorum (atp8, atp9) and D. pinodes (atp8, atp9, cox2).
A Generalized time-reversible (GTR) model was used with an estimated gamma parameter of rate heterogeneity to build maximum likelihood (ML) trees using the Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood RAxML version 8.0 [58] and PhyML version 3.0 [59] programs. One hundred bootstrapped trees were generated and used to assign bootstrap support values to the consensus trees. A Bayesian phylogeny and divergence time analysis was carried out using BEAST2 version 2.5.1 [60]. Separate partitions for each gene were created with BEAUti2 (available in BEAST2). More suitable substitution models for each gene were found using the software package jModelTest2 version 2 [61] according to the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) [62]. To accommodate for rate heterogeneity across the branches of the tree we used an uncorrelated relaxed clock model [63] with a lognormal distribution of rates for each gene estimated during the analyses. We also used a strict clock for further comparison of results.
The fossil Metacapnodiaceae [64] was used, assuming this to be a common ancestor of the order Capnodiales with a minimum age of 100 MYA (gamma distribution, offset 100, mean 180, maximum softbound 400). Capnodiales nodes were constrained to monophyly based on the results obtained from ML analysis. A birth/death tree prior was used to model the speciation of nodes in the topology, with gamma priors on the probability of splits and extinctions. We used vague priors on the substitution rates for each gene (gamma distribution with mean 0.2 in units of substitutions per site per time unit). All XML files used to build our Bayesian phylogenies are available at Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101055.v1 (accessed on 10 February 2021)). To ensure convergence we ran analyses five times for 50 million generations each, sampling parameters every 5000 generations, assessing convergence and sufficient chain mixing (Effective Sample Sizes > 200) using Tracer version 1.5 [65]. After removal of 20% of each run as burn-in, the remaining trees were combined using LogCombiner (available in BEAST2), summarized as maximum clade credibility (MCC) trees in TreeAnnotator (available in BEAST2), and visualized using FigTree version 1.3.1 [66].

3. Results

3.1. P. fijiensis Mitochondrial Genome

The whole-genome assembly of P. fijiensis had an N50 = 39,827 bp and a size of 70.53 Mb in 8040 scaffolds. Recovered scaffolds had an estimated genome coverage of 50X. To separate scaffolds belonging to P. fijiensis mitogenome, whole-genome scaffolds were mapped to a draft and unpublished P. fijiensis mitogenome (see Table S1). Scaffolds belonging to the mitogenome of P. fijiensis were recovered and assembled in a circular sequence deposited in GenBank (accession number: MK754071).
P. fijiensis mitogenome is a circular molecule of 74,089 bp in length containing 14 Electron Transport Chain Conserved Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes (CMPCG), two ribosomal RNAs, 38 tRNA genes and twelve putative Open Reading Frames (ORFs) of unknown function (Figure 1, Table 1). CMPCGs included ATP Synthase subunits (atp6, atp8, and atp9), Cytochrome Oxidase subunits I, II, and III (cox1, cox2, and cox3), Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase subunits nad2 and nad1, 3, 5, 6, nad4L (Figure 1A, Table 1).
Twelve putative ORFs of unknown function were predicted to produce hypothetical proteins containing 77 to 583 amino acids, which were described as ORF1-ORF11 and ORF Cytb-like. CMPCGs covered 65.55% of the genome (including 11.77% putative ORFs) (Figure 1A, Table 1). tRNA genes and both rnl and rns corresponded to 8.8% and 10.67% respectively (Figure 1B, Table 1). These values were similar to those reported for other representatives of the Ascomycota phylum (Table 2). Overall, P. fijiensis mtDNA has a nucleotide composition of: 36.6% of A, 13.4% of C, 12.6% of G and 37.7% of T. GC-content was 26% with coding and non-coding parts of the genome having, on average, the same GC-percentage.
The three most frequent codons were TTA (708 counts), ATA (498 counts) and TTT (498 counts) encoded amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine, respectively. These amino acids have hydrophobic side chains commonly found in transmembrane helices. These three codons accounted for 6.9% of all codons in the mitogenome. Eight codons (ATA, ATT, TTA, and TTG encoding methionine; CGA, CGC, CGG encoding arginine and TAG encoding a stop codon) were under-represented, being used from one to five times each. CMPCGs started with ATA, ATG, ATT or TTA encoding methionine translation initiation codon. The preferred stop codon was TAA, present in 21 protein-coding genes; the alternative stop codon was TAG. Codon usage of the ORFs was similar to that of the protein-coding loci. Atp9 also contained the highest GC contents (40.9%) among all the CMPCGs (Table 1).
Thirty-eight tRNAs encoded by the mitogenome of P. fijiensis carry all 20 amino acids (Figure 1B, Table 1). Two tRNA iso-acceptors were identified for serine and leucine, and four for arginine and methionine. Among the 38 tRNAs, tRNA-Val, tRNA-Tyr, tRNA-Asp, tRNA-Lys, tRNA-Asn, tRNA-Pro occurred singly (Table 1). tRNA genes were grouped into nine clusters. (Figure 1B).
Twenty-nine repeat regions ranging from 611 bp to 128 bp were located in non-coding regions of the mtDNA, but only one was present three times (length 193 bp) (Table 2). A search within the P. fijiensis mitogenome detected 33 SSR markers. The most common SSR were mononucleotide (30 SSR), and only three dinucleotide SSR were found (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101058 (accessed on 10 February 2021)). A difference of seven nucleotides between P. fijiensis isolate 081022 and the unpublished mitochondrial genome available in MycoCosm was found, being 99% identical (Table S1).

3.1.1. Presence of Truncated Conserved Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes (CMPCGs)

P. fijiensis mitogenome had truncated copies of four CMPCGs. They were considered truncated copies because they have PFAM and PANTHER domains and high local sequence similarity (>90%) with a complete CMPCG copy despite being an incomplete sequence without start and/or stop codons. Truncated copies included atp6 (two truncated copies and one complete gene sequence), and cox1, cob, nad2 and atp9 (one truncated copy and one complete gene sequence). PCR amplifications were performed to confirm the presence of CMPCG copies in the P. fijiensis mitochondrial genome (Figure 2). The annotation showed that cox 1 had one complete copy with an intron and a second truncated copy (see Figure 2A). Primers were designed to amplify three intra and intergenic regions in these two copies (Figure 2A–D). The amplified PCR bands were of the expected size showing that the assembly on this region was correct (Figure 2B). The presence of an intron in the complete cytochrome b (cob) gene of P. fijiensis was also experimentally confirmed by PCR amplification (Figure S1).

3.1.2. Homing Endonucleases and Introns in the P. fijiensis Mitogenome

A total of two different mobile introns were annotated in the mitogenome of P. fijiensis (Figure 1A). All encoding introns were characterized as group I intron type, which encodes homing endonucleases (HE) [67]. They belonged to the LAGLIDADG family and were 680 bp for an intronic-ORF of 2968 bp length in nad5 and 743 bp long for an intronic-ORF of 1056 bp length in cob (Figure 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

3.2. Comparative Analysis among Mitochondrial Genomes of Selected Mycosphaerellaceae

The mitochondrial phylogeny of selected species of Mycosphaerellaceae confirms evolutionary relationships found in nuclear phylogenies (((Sphaerulina musiva + Sphaerulina populicola) + (P. fijiensis + (P. eumusae + P. musae)) Zymoseptoria tritici) Zasmidium cellare) [10,12] (Figure 3). We used this phylogeny to compare mitogenomes of Pseudocercospora fijiensis, P. eumusae, P. musae, Sphaerulina populicola, and S. musiva, and previously published mitogenomes of Zymoseptoria tritici and Zasmidium cellare. They showed a GC content of between 27% and 32% and a variability in genome size from 23,743 bp in “cellar mold” Zasmidium cellare to 136,606 bp in poplar pathogen Sphaerulina populicola (Table 2, Figure 3 and Figure S2).
Annotated genes of seven selected Mycosphaerellaceae mitogenomes showed the presence of a set of 14 Conserved Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes (CMPCGs), namely the subunits of the electron transport chain complex I (nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5 and nad6), complex III (cob), complex IV (cox1, cox2 and cox3), and ATP synthase subunits (atp6, atp8 and atp9) (Figure 4, Table S2). There was a small ribosomal subunit RNA (rns), a large ribosomal subunit rRNA (rnl), and a set of 24 to 38 tRNAs (Table 2).
In addition to these core genes, five out of seven mitogenomes also have hypothetical protein coding genes, accessory genes, additional copies of CMPCGs and genetic mobile elements (Figure 3, Table S2). Genome sizes, gene numbers and contents are heterogeneous among species (Table 2, Figure 3). All annotated genomes were found to have truncated gene duplications of some CMPCGs (Table S2). Alignments of truncated gene copies showed their sequences were not identical. However, one of the copies always had a complete coding sequence with a start and a stop codon (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13542191 (accessed on 10 February 2021)). Mitochondrial genomes from P. musae and P. eumusae also had RNA and DNA polymerases (Table S2).
The order of CMPCGs among selected Mycosphaerellaceae mitogenomes was variable, except for sister species Sphaerulina populicola and S. musiva (Figure 4). Despite this variability, gene pair order was always conserved for gene pairs nad4L-nad5, nad3-nad2 and atp8-atp6 among all mitogenomes (Figure 4). We mapped RNAseq assembled transcripts from transcriptomes available online for S. musiva (SRR1652271), P. fijiensis (SRR3593877, SRR3593879), P. eumusae (GDIK00000000.1) and P. musae (GDIN00000000.1) to P. fijiensis, S. musiva, P. musae and, P. eumusae mitochondrial genomes and found neighbor genes were always part of the same transcript for each species. This suggested that they were transcribed as a single mRNA. RT-PCR amplification and subsequent Sanger sequencing confirmed bicistronic expression for nad3-nad2, atp8-atp6 gene pairs in P. fijiensis (Figure 5).
Major differences in genome size among members of Mycosphaerellaceae seemed to be related to the invasive presence of HEG and ORFs in some mitogenomes. Zasmidium cellare and Zymoseptoria tritici have compact mitogenomes with core mitochondrial genes (CMPCGs) and lack of HEG. While, in other Mycosphaerellaceae, the presence of sequences containing LAGLIDADG or GIY-YIG domains related to Homing Endonuclease Genes (HEGs) was observed (Table 2). These ORFs ranged from one in Pseudocercospora musae and P. eumusae to 28 in Sphaerulina populicola (Table 2). S. populicola has the largest mitogenome report in this study (139,606 bp), suggesting HEGs might have caused fragmentation of CMPCGs. In almost all instances, pieces of CMPCGs were collinearly distributed and each fragment was found to be followed by an insertion of a HEG related sequence. An extreme case of HEG invasion to CMPCGs was found in cox1 of Sphaerulina populicola (CDS: 1542 bp). This gene has twelve fragments distributed along 22,070 bp, each of them containing a piece of cox1 followed by a HEG related domain (Figure S3).

3.3. Inferred Mitochondrial Phylogeny and Diversification Times

A robust phylogeny with posterior probabilities greater than 0.97 was recovered, containing two main lineages (Pleosporales + Capnodiales). Divergence time estimates using fossil calibration are shown in Figure 6, with horizontal bars representing the 95% Highest Posterior Density (HPD) intervals for each node. According to our data, Mycosphaerellaceae diverged from the rest of Capnodiales at the end of the Mesozoic or the early Paleogene, about 66.66 MYA (55.47–78.27 MYA, 95% HPD). The earliest split within Mycosphaerellaceae gave rise to Zasmidium cellare. The species Zymoseptoria tritici diverged from (Sphaerulina + Pseudocercospora) also at the end of the Mesozoic or the early Paleogene 59.88 MYA (49.7–70.91 MYA, 95% HPD). The sister genera Sphaerulina + Pseudocercospora diverged in the Eocene, 48.1 MYA (39.34–57.86 MYA, 95% HPD). The sister clade to the species in the Sigatoka complex includes the species Sphaerulina musiva and S. populicola sharing their last common ancestor during the Miocene, 13.39 MYA (9.39–17.69 MYA, 95% HPD). The origin of Pseudocercospora members of the Sigatoka disease complex in bananas was dated to around 13.31 MYA (9.49–17.28 MYA, 95% HPD) during the Miocene while the sister species P. eumusae and P. musae split from their shared ancestor in the late Miocene 8.22 MYA (5.6–11.07 MYA, 95% HPD) (Figure 6).
Divergence times were also estimated using strict clock, in order to validate differences between mean node ages using relaxed lognormal clock versus strict clock. For a strict clock, 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals were significantly broader (27–131 MY) in comparison to (6–23 MY) and mean node ages were among 9–43 MY older (Table 3) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13542938.v1 (accessed on 10 February 2021)).

4. Discussion

In this study, the complete mitochondrial genome of a plant pathogenic fungus, Pseudocercospora fijiensis, was sequenced and annotated. We also used comparative analysis and fossil calibration phylogenies to further understand the evolution of Mycosphaerellaceae mitogenomes. To date, more than 700 complete fungal mitogenomes are available online, but the mitogenomes of Pseudocercospora species have not been reported in the organelle genome database of NCBI (August 2017). The mitogenome of P. fijiensis and related species provides a molecular basis for further studies on molecular systematics and evolutionary dynamics of Ascomycota fungi especially belonging to Dothideomycetes.
Ascomycetes mitochondrial genomes like most mitochondrial genomes along the tree of life generally consist of: two ribosomal subunits (rnl and rns), a distinct set of tRNAs and fourteen genes of the respiratory chain complexes (cox1, cox2, cox3, cob, nad1 to nad6, atp6, atp8 and atp9) [17]. The mtDNA of P. fijiensis contains the 14 mitochondrial inner membrane proteins involved in electron transport and coupled oxidative phosphorylation, as well as rnl and rns (Figure 1). These genes were also found in mitochondrial genomes of selected Mycosphaerellaceae species studied here. Additionally, DNA polymerases, RNA polymerases and Reverse transcriptases were found in Pseudocercospora musae, P. eumusae and S. populicola (Table S1). These polymerases and transcriptases might come from mitochondrial plasmids integrated into their mitochondrial genomes [21,68,69].
A variable number of open reading frames of unknown function and introns related to homing endonuclease genes (HEG), often including GIY-YIG or LAGLIDADG protein domains, were found in several Mycosphaerellaceae genomes including P. fijiensis (Table 2; Figure 1). Despite not being ubiquitous in Ascomycete mitogenomes these mobile elements are fairly common [16,17,22,67,70]. Differences in mitogenome sizes, gene order and gene duplication among Mycosphaerellaceae are attributed to heterogeneous content of accessory genes, and intron mobile sequences (Table 1, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The comparative study of Mycosphaerellaceae species selected mitogenomes showed that sizes and gene order are not conserved among members of the family (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Divergence times within sister clades Pseudocercospora 13.31 MYA (9.49–17.28 MYA, 95% HPD) and Sphaerulina 13.39 MYA (9.39–17.69 MYA, 95% HPD) are roughly the same (Table 3; Figure 6). But gene order in Sphaerulina species is conserved while in Pseudocercospora species it is not (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Nonetheless, some gene pairs were always found together, atp6-atp8, nad2-nad3, nad4L-nad5, in most studied species (Figure 4). Gene order variation among Mycosphaerellaceae could be due to mtDNA rearrangements caused by different processes, such as fusion, fission, recombination, plasmid integration and mobility [21]. Aguileta et al. (2014) compared 38 fungal mitogenomes to understand mitochondrial gene order evolution. They found evidence of gene rearrangements and a relationship with intronic ORFs and repeats. Their results support recombination in all fungal phyla. Despite rearrangements being pervasive in fungal mitogenomes, they found conserved gene pairs nad2-nad3 and nad4L-nad5 in most species [20]. Bicistronic transcription of atp6-atp8, nad2-nad3 gene pairs was confirmed experimentally in P. fijiensis using RT-PCR (Figure 5). Maintenance of such proximity through evolution is important for mitochondria functions and modifications of such proximity can negatively affect organisms [71].
Even though sister species Sphaerulina musiva and S. populicola shared core gene content and gene order, their genomes sizes were quite different (53,234 bp and 139,606 bp). This could be due to a widespread occurrence of homing endonucleases HEG related to ORFs and accessory genes in the S. populicola mitogenome (Table S1, Figure S2). Mitogenome size variability due to the occurrence of mobile elements and accessory gene invasions was also observed in nine phylogenetically related species belonging to the genera Aspergillus and Penicilium [72]. In a phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia borealis mitogenome size expansion was also shown to be due to plasmid-like sequences and HEGs related to ORFs [73].
Mitochondrial gene duplication is seldom described in fungi. HEGs invasion has been previously described in fungal mtDNA, where truncated genes were ubiquitous [74]. P. fijiensis and other Mycosphaerellaceae mitogenomes have 2 to12 truncated copies of Conserved Mitocondrial Protein Coding Genes (CMPCGs) (Table S1). Truncated CMPCGs have partial sequences lacking start and/or stop codons. Truncated gene copies did not have a particular distribution pattern; they were either close to each other or dispersed in the genomes. Mardanov et al. (2014) found duplications of truncated extra copies of atp9 and atp6 in the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia borealis [73]. Two incomplete copies of atp6 were also found on different strands of the mtDNA of Shiraia bambusicola (Pleosporales) [46]. However, it is not common to find highly fragmented genes such as the cox1 of Sphaerulina populicola (Figure S3). A similar case was reported in the mitogenome of Sclerotinia borealis, where thirteen introns of cox1 and truncated copies of CMPCGs were found [73].
Fossil calibrated phylogenies for the Mycospharellaceae had later diversification times 66.66 MYA (55.47–78.27 MYA, 95% HPD) compared to previous studies 186.7–143.6 MYA [10]. The Sigatoka disease complex had an early divergent Pseudocercospora fijiensis, that splits from sister species P. musae + P. eumusae 13.31 MYA (9.49–17.28 MYA, 95% HPD); while sister species P. eumusae and P. musae split from their shared ancestor in the late Miocene 8.22 MYA (5.6–11.07 MYA, 95% HPD) (Figure 6). Chang et al. (2016) estimated the divergence of P. fijiensis from their last common ancestor with P. musae + P. eumusae to be between 39.9–30.6 MYA and the divergence of P. musae and P. eumusae to be between 22.6–17.4 MYA. Diversification ages estimated here were based on mitochondrial markers and Bayesian analysis using both relaxed and strict clock models. These have placed all diversification times in the Mycosphaerellaceae at later times than those calculated by Chang et al. (2016) using nuclear markers, penalized maximum likelihood analysis and strict clock, except for that of Sphaerulina (Table 3).
These differences in diversification times compared to Chang et al. (2016) could be due to different calibration points and dating methods. Chang et al. (2016) implemented r8s Likelihood methods [75] and a calibration at the origin of the Dothideomycetes crown group (394–285 MYA) using previous Bayesian estimations [76]. For this study Bayesian analysis in BEAST2 [60] using fossil calibration with a Metacapnodiaceae fossil was implemented [64]. We found that Sigatoka disease members (13.31 MYA (9.49–17.28 MYA, 95% HPD)) appeared after the genus Musa (27.9 MYA (21.5–34.4, 95% HPD)) [77]. Species member of this genus within the section Eumusa sensu latto comprise cultivated banana and are the host of the Sigatoka disease complex. This naturally prompts a further question: did the Sigatoka disease complex originate through host-tracking evolution? This hypothesis explains that a pathogen is likely to be younger than the host until changes related to the genetics of the pathogens or/and exogenous factors have observed alterations in their virulence spectra [70]. We are currently limited in terms of a good taxonomic sampling and biogeographical analysis for Pseudocercospora species in arriving at an answer to this question. A host tracking coevolution hypothesis has also been proposed for Zymoseptoria tritici (syn. Mycosphaerella graminicola) [5].

5. Conclusions

We successfully sequenced and analyzed mitochondrial genomes of Pseudocercospora fijiensis, P. eumusae, P. musae, Sphaerulina populicola and S. musiva. A robust mitochondrial phylogeny containing two main lineages (Pleosporales + Capnodiales) was obtained and divergence times were estimated using fossil calibration. Fossil calibrated phylogenies are reported for the first time here for fungal plant pathogens that had later diversification times for the origin of all the species involved, compared to previous studies. Genome size variation and organization among Mycosphaerellaceae could be related to the proliferation of type I and II introns, gene duplications and possible plasmid insertions, phenomena known for many fungal mitogenomes. Despite their order variability, some genes were always recovered as neighbors in all mitogenomes analyzed. Bicistronic expression for nad3-nad2, atp8-atp6 gene pairs in P. fijiensis was confirmed experimentally. Further gene editing and virulence assays will be important to shed light on fungal adaptation and more effective disease control strategies. Phylogenomic studies including a good taxonomic sampling and biogeographical analysis for Pseudocercospora species will further clarify whether the Sigatoka disease-causing species virulence flared-up after Musa domestication.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/3/215/s1: Table S1. Sources of genomic data used in this study. Table S2: Protein-coding genes annotated in Mycosphaerellaceae mitochondrial genomes, Figure S1: Mitochondrial gene duplication in Pseudocercospora fijiensis. A. The intron of cob. B. PCR amplification of intra and intergenic sequences among exons. C. Primers used for the amplification of cob, Figure S2: Circular map of the mitogenome of Sphaerulina musiva and Sphaerulina populicola. Smaller 53,234 bp and larger 139,606 bp mitogenomes from selected species of Mycosphaerellaceae used in this study, Figure S3: Homing endonuclease invasion in the mitochondrial genome of Sphaerulina populicola. Truncated cox1 copy possibly due to a pervasive HEGs invasion. Numbers one-12 represent different internal Open Reading Frames (ORFs). Domains content in the ORFs are listed in the table along with their position within cox1.

Author Contributions

J.E.A.-G.: Co-developed questions and framework, performed lab work, performed bioinformatic analysis, and wrote manuscript. R.E.A.: Co-developed questions and framework, edit manuscript, provided funding and mentored students. J.M.T.-B.: performed lab work and some bioinformatic analysis. T.A.: Co-developed questions and framework, performed some bioinformatic analysis, wrote and edit manuscript, provided funding and mentored student. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Instituto para el desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología “Francisco José de Caldas (Colciencias)”, Colombia, grant nunmber: 221356934854; The Asociación de Bananeros de Colombia (Cenibanano-AUGURA), the program “Jovenes Investigadores e Innovadores por la Paz convocatoria 755-2017” funded by Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación of Colombia.

Data Availability Statement

Pseudocercospora fijiensis NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (nad5) mRNA, partial cds; mitochondrial 502 bp linear mRNA MN171340.1 GI:1817958850. Pseudocercospora fijiensis cytochrome b (cob) mRNA, partial cds; mitochondrial, 159 bp linear mRNA MN171339.1 GI:1817958848. Pseudocercospora fijiensis cytochrome b (cob) gene, partial cds; mitochondrial, 1121 bp linear DNA MN171338.1 GI:1817958846. Pseudocercospora fijiensis NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 (nad3) mRNAs, partial cds; mitochondrial, 2377 bp linear mRNA MN171337.1 GI:1817958843. Pseudocercospora fijiensis NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 (nad3) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2) genes, partial cds; mitochondrial, 1188 bp linear DNA, MN171336.1 GI:1817958840. Pseudocercospora fijiensis ATP synthase subunit 8 (atp8) gene, complete cds; and ATP synthase subunit 6 (atp6) gene, partial cds; mitochondrial, 701 bp linear DNA, MN171335.1 GI:1817958837. Pseudocercospora fijiensis ATP synthase subunit 8 (atp8) and ATP synthase subunit 6 (atp6) mRNAs, partial cds; mitochondrial, 676 bp linear mRNA, MN171334.1 GI:1817958834. Arcila Galvis, Juliana Estefanía; Arias, Tatiana (2020): Data non-curated for NCBI Pseudocercospora fijiensis and related Mycosphaerellaceae mitochondrial genomes. Figshare Dataset: https://figshare.com/account/home#/projects/78525 (accessed on 10 February 2021). Arcila Galvis, Juliana Estefanía; Arias, Tatiana (2020): Annotated mitochondrial genomes of Mycosphaerellaceae. Figshare Dataset: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101058.v1 (accessed on 10 February 2021). Arcila Galvis, Juliana Estefanía; Arias, Tatiana (2020): P.fijiensis DATA. Figshare Dataset: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101013 (accessed on 10 February 2021). Arcila Galvis, Juliana Estefanía; Arias, Tatiana (2020): xml files used to build Bayesian phylogenies. figshare. Figshare Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12101055.v1 (accessed on 10 February 2021).

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael R. McKain, Yesid Cuesta Astroz and Diego Mauricio Riaño Pachón for their valuable advice during the study, Luis Eduardo Mejia for help with illustrations, Alejandro Rodriguez Cabal for his guidance in Linux and bioinformatics tools, Isabel Cristina Calle for experimental assistance doing PCR assays and Juan Santiago Zuluaga for financial help to support Juliana Arcila work at CIB. Sequence data for Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica were produced by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute http://www.jgi.doe.gov/in (accessed on 10 February 2021) collaboration with the user community.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Crous, P.W.; Kirk, P.M.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Boonmee, S.; Braun, U.; Dai, D.Q.; D’souza, M.J.; Diederich, P.; Dissanayake, A.; et al. Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names. Fungal. Divers. 2014, 69, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Videira, S.I.R.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Nakashima, C.; Braun, U.; Barreto, R.W.; de Wit, P.J.; Crous, P.W. Mycosphaerellaceae—Chaos or clarity? Stud. Mycol. 2017, 87, 257–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Carlier, J.; Zapater, M.-F.; Lapeyre, F.; Jones, D.R.; Mourichon, X. Septoria Leaf Spot of Banana: A Newly Discovered Disease Caused by Mycosphaerella eumusae (Anamorph Septoria eumusae). Phytopathology 2000, 90, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Thomma, B.P.; Van Esse, H.P.; Crous, P.W.; de Wit, P.J. Cladosporium fulvum (syn. Passalora fulva), a highly specialized plant pathogen as a model for functional studies on plant pathogenic Mycosphaerellaceae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stukenbrock, E.H.; Banke, S.; Javan-Nikkhah, M.; McDonald, B.A. Origin and Domestication of the Fungal Wheat Pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola via Sympatric Speciation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 24, 398–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. De Lapeyre, L.; Bellaire, D.; Fouré, E.; Abadie, C.; Carlier, J. Black Leaf Streak Disease is challenging the banana industry. Fruits 2010, 65, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Drenkhan, R.; Adamson, K.; Jürimaa, K.; Hanso, M. Dothistroma septosporum on firs (Abies spp.) in the northern Baltics. For. Pathol. 2014, 44, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dhillon, B.; Feau, N.; Aerts, A.L.; Beauseigle, S.; Bernier, L.; Copeland, A.; Foster, A.; Navdeep, G.; Henrissat, B.; Herath, P.; et al. Horizontal gene transfer and gene dosage drives adaptation to wood colonization in a tree pathogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3451–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Arzanlou, M.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Fullerton, R.A.; Abeln, E.C.A.; Carlier, J.; Zapater, M.-F.; Buddenhagen, W.; Viljoen, A.; Crous, P.W. Multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several novel species of Mycosphaerella and related anamorphs on banana. Pers. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2008, 20, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chang, T.C.; Salvucci, A.; Crous, P.W.; Stergiopoulos, I. Comparative Genomics of the Sigatoka Disease Complex on Banana Suggests a Link between Parallel Evolutionary Changes in Pseudocercospora fijiensis and Pseudocercospora eumusae and Increased Virulence on the Banana Host. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ohm, R.A.; Feau, N.; Henrissat, B.; Schoch, C.L.; Horwitz, B.A.; Barry, K.W.; Condon, B.J.; Copeland, A.C.; Dhillon, B.; Glaser, F.; et al. Diverse Lifestyles and Strategies of Plant Pathogenesis Encoded in the Genomes of Eighteen Dothideomycetes Fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1003037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Arango Isaza, R.E.; Diaz-Trujillo, C.; Dhillon, B.; Aerts, A.; Carlier, J.; Crane, C.F.; de Jong, T.V.; de Vries, I.; Dietrich, R.; Farmer, A.D.; et al. Combating a Global Threat to a Clonal Crop: Banana Black Sigatoka Pathogen Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Synonym Mycosphaerella fijiensis) Genomes Reveal Clues for Disease Control. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Churchill, A.C.L. Mycosphaerella fijiensis, the black leaf streak pathogen of banana: Progress towards understanding pathogen biology and detection, disease development, and the challenges of control. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2011, 12, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Forget, L.; Ustinova, J.; Wang, Z.; Huss, V.A.R.; Franz Lang, B. Hyaloraphidium curvatum: A Linear Mitochondrial Genome, tRNA Editing, and an Evolutionary Link to Lower Fungi. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, W.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, L.; Shu, F.; Ma, X.; Bian, Y. The mitochondrial genome of Morchella importuna (272.2 kb) is the largest among fungi and contains numerous introns, mitochondrial non-conserved open reading frames and repetitive sequences. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hausner, G. Fungal mitochondrial genomes. Fungal Genomics. 2003, 3, 101. [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark-Walker, G.D. Evolution of Mitochondrial Genomes in Fungi. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1992, 141, 89–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wolf, K.; Giudice, L.D. The Variable Mitochondrial Genome of Ascomycetes: Organization, Mutational Alterations, and Expression. Adv. Genet. 1988, 25, 185–308. [Google Scholar]
  19. Paquin, B.; Laforest, M.J.; Forget, L.; Roewer, I.; Wang, Z.; Longcore, J.; Lang, B.F. The fungal mitochondrial genome project: Evolution of fungal mitochondrial genomes and their gene expression. Curr. Genet. 1997, 31, 380–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aguileta, G.; De Vienne, D.M.; Ross, O.N.; Hood, M.E.; Giraud, T.; Petit, E.; Gabaldón, T. High variability of mitochondrial gene order among fungi. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Kawano, S.; Takano, H.; Kuroiwa, T. Sexuality of Mitochondria: Fusion, Recombination, and Plasmids. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1995, 161, 49–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Burger, G.; Gray, M.W.; Lang, B.F. Mitochondrial genomes: Anything goes. Trends Genet. 2003, 19, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Franz Lang, B.; Laforest, M.-J.; Burger, G. Mitochondrial introns: A critical view. Trends Genet. 2007, 23, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alverson, A.J.; Wei, X.; Rice, D.W.; Stern, D.B.; Barry, K.; Palmer, J.D. Insights into the Evolution of Mitochondrial Genome Size from Complete Sequences of Citrullus lanatus and Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 1436–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bernt, M.; Braband, A.; Schierwater, B.; Stadler, P.F. Genetic aspects of mitochondrial genome evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Torriani, S.F.F.; Penselin, D.; Knogge, W.; Felder, M.; Taudien, S.; Platzer, M.; McDonald, B.A.; Brunner, P.C. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes from closely related Rhynchosporium species reveals extensive intron invasion. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2014, 62, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Basse, C.W. Mitochondrial inheritance in fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Griffiths, A.J.F. Mitochondrial inheritance in filamentous fungi. J. Genet. 1996, 75, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beimforde, C.; Feldberg, K.; Nylinder, S.; Rikkinen, J.; Tuovila, H.; Dörfelt, H.; Gube, M.; Jackson, D.J.; Reitner, J.; Seyfullah, L.J.; et al. Estimating the Phanerozoic history of the Ascomycota lineages: Combining fossil and molecular data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014, 78, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Torriani, S.F.F.; Goodwin, S.B.; Kema, G.H.J.; Pangilinan, J.L.; McDonald, B.A. Intraspecific comparison and annotation of two complete mitochondrial genome sequences from the plant pathogenic fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Goodwin, S.B.; Mccorison, C.B.; Cavaletto, J.R.; Culley, D.E.; Labutti, K.; Baker, S.E.; Grigoriev, I.V. The mitochondrial genome of the ethanol-metabolizing, wine cellar mold Zasmidium cellare is the smallest for a filamentous ascomycete. Fungal. Biol. 2016, 120, 961–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Johanson, A.; Jeger, M.J. Use of PCR for detection of Mycosphaerella fijiensis and M. musicola, the causal agents of Sigatoka leaf spots in banana and plantain. Mycol. Res. 1993, 97, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cañas-Gutiérrez, G.P.; Angarita-Velásquez, M.J.; Restrepo-Flórez, J.M.; Rodríguez, P.; Moreno, C.X.; Arango, R. Analysis of the CYP51 gene and encoded protein in propiconazole-resistant isolates of Mycosphaerella fijiensis. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Benson, D.A.; Boguski, M.S.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Ouellette, B.F.F.; Rapp, B.A.; Wheeler, D.L. GenBank. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 1999, 27, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. O’Leary, N.A.; Wright, M.W.; Brister, J.R.; Ciufo, S.; Haddad, D.; McVeigh, R.; Rajput, B.; Robbertse, B.; Smith-White, B.; Ako-Adjei, D.; et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2016, 44, D733–D745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Grigoriev, I.V.; Nikitin, R.; Haridas, S.; Kuo, A.; Ohm, R.; Otillar, R.; Riley, R.; Salamov, A.; Zhao, X.; Korzeniewski, F.; et al. MycoCosm portal: Gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucleic Acids. Res. 2014, 42, D699–D704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  38. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Boetzer, M.; Henkel, C.V.; Jansen, H.J.; Butler, D.; Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 578–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Nadalin, F.; Vezzi, F.; Policriti, A. GapFiller: A de novo assembly approach to fill the gap within paired reads. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13 (Suppl. 14), S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hunt, M.; Kikuchi, T.; Sanders, M.; Newbold, C.; Berriman, M.; Otto, T.D. REAPR: A universal tool for genome assembly evaluation. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hane, J.K.; Lowe, R.G.T.; Solomon, P.S.; Tan, K.-C.; Schoch, C.L.; Spatafora, J.W.; Crous, P.W.; Kodira, C.; Birren, B.W.; Galagan, J.E.; et al. Dothideomycete plant interactions illuminated by genome sequencing and EST analysis of the wheat pathogen Stagonospora nodorum. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3347–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Shen, X.-Y.; Li, T.; Chen, S.; Fan, L.; Gao, J.; Hou, C.-L. Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Mitochondrial Genome of Shiraia bambusicola Reveals Special Features in the Order of Pleosporales. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hahn, C.; Bachmann, L.; Chevreux, B. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—A baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Johnson, M.; Zaretskaya, I.; Raytselis, Y.; Merezhuk, Y.; McGinnis, S.; Madden, T.L. NCBI BLAST: A better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W5–W9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Jühling, F.; Externbrink, F.; Florentz, C.; Fritzsch, G.; Pütz, J.; Middendorf, M.; Stadler, P.F. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Finn, R.D.; Bateman, A.; Clements, J.; Coggill, P.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Eddy, S.R.; Heger, A.; Hetherington, K.; Holm, L.; Mistry, J.; et al. Pfam: The protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D222–D230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Mi, H.; Huang, X.; Muruganujan, A.; Tang, H.; Mills, C.; Kang, D.; Thomas, P.D. PANTHER version 11: Expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D183–D189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Beier, S.; Thiel, T.; Münch, T.; Scholz, U.; Mascher, M. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2583–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Okorski, A.; Pszczółkowska, A.; Jastrzębski, J.P.; Paukszto, Ł.; Okorska, S. The complete mitogenome of Mycosphaerella pinodes (Ascomycota, Mycosphaerellaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 48–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Braun, U.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Scheuer, C. Pseudovirgaria, a fungicolous hyphomycete genus. IMA Fungus 2011, 2, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bouckaert, R.; Heled, J.; Kühnert, D.; Vaughan, T.; Wu, C.-H.; Xie, D.; Suchard, M.A.; Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J. BEAST 2: A Software Platform for Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Schwarz, G. Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Drummond, A.J.; Ho, S.Y.W.; Phillips, M.J.; Rambaut, A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Schmidt, A.R.; Beimforde, C.; Seyfullah, L.J.; Wege, S.-E.; Dörfelt, H.; Girard, V.; Grabenhorst, H.; Gube, M.; Heinrichs, J.; Nel, A.; et al. Amber fossils of sooty moulds. Rev. Palaeobot Palynol. 2014, 200, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A. Tracer: MCMC Trace Analysis Tool, Version 1.5.; University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2009; Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  66. Rambaut, A. FigTree: Tree Figure Drawing Tool, Version 1.3.1. 2006. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  67. Megarioti, A.H.; Kouvelis, V.N. The Coevolution of Fungal Mitochondrial Introns and Their Homing Endonucleases (GIY-YIG and LAGLIDADG). Genome. Biol. Evol. 2020, 12, 1337–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Griffiths, A.J. Natural plasmids of filamentous fungi. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 59, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cahan, P.; Kennell, J.C. Identification and distribution of sequences having similarity to mitochondrial plasmids in mitochondrial genomes of filamentous fungi. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2005, 273, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jelen, V.; de Jonge, R.; Van de Peer, Y.; Javornik, B.; Jakše, J. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Verticillium-wilt causing plant pathogen Verticillium nonalfalfae. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Salvatori, R. Organization and Regulation of Mitochondrial Gene Expression; Stockholm University: Stockholm, Sweden, 2020; Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1416629/FULLTEXT01.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Ncc4BTQ26Ygmh_aPBdwvK6HDsivbSSp44OIHnBdMdsSYEzCTqT6P0Bwo (accessed on 1 July 2017).
  72. Joardar, V.; Abrams, N.F.; Hostetler, J.; Paukstelis, P.J.; Pakala, S.; Pakala, S.B.; Zafar, N.; Abolude, O.O.; Payne, J.; Andrianopoulos, A.; et al. Sequencing of mitochondrial genomes of nine Aspergillus and Penicillium species identifies mobile introns and accessory genes as main sources of genome size variability. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mardanov, A.V.; Beletsky, A.V.; Kadnikov, V.V.; Ignatov, A.N.; Ravin, N.V. The 203 kbp mitochondrial genome of the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia borealis reveals multiple invasions of introns and genomic duplications. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dassa, B.; London, N.; Stoddard, B.L.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Pietrokovski, S. Fractured genes: A novel genomic arrangement involving new split inteins and a new homing endonuclease family. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 2560–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sanderson, M.J. r8s: Inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 301–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Gueidan, C.; Ruibal, C.; de Hoog, G.S.; Schneider, H. Rock-inhabiting fungi originated during periods of dry climate in the late Devonian and middle Triassic. Fungal. Biol. 2011, 115, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Christelová, P.; Valárik, M.; Eva, H.; Langhe, E.D.; Dole, J. A multi gene sequence-based phylogeny of the Musaceae (banana) family. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Circular map of the mitogenome of Pseudocercospora fijiensis. Genes are visualized by arrows, which are presented in a clockwise direction (forward). (A) Annotated introns, hypothetical Open Reading Frames (ORFs), group I mobile introns (Homing Endonuclease Genes (HEGs)) and genic regions; clusters of tRNA and rRNA are also indicated here. (B) Annotated tRNA and rRNA regions. Green color arrows: protein-coding genes; yellow color arrows: Coding regions CDS and introns; orange arrows: hypothetical ORFs; blue arrows: genes of large and small ribosomal subunits; bright yellow arrows: tRNAs genes; grey arrow: HEGs. Circular mitogenomes were generated by using the Geneious Primer [43].
Figure 1. Circular map of the mitogenome of Pseudocercospora fijiensis. Genes are visualized by arrows, which are presented in a clockwise direction (forward). (A) Annotated introns, hypothetical Open Reading Frames (ORFs), group I mobile introns (Homing Endonuclease Genes (HEGs)) and genic regions; clusters of tRNA and rRNA are also indicated here. (B) Annotated tRNA and rRNA regions. Green color arrows: protein-coding genes; yellow color arrows: Coding regions CDS and introns; orange arrows: hypothetical ORFs; blue arrows: genes of large and small ribosomal subunits; bright yellow arrows: tRNAs genes; grey arrow: HEGs. Circular mitogenomes were generated by using the Geneious Primer [43].
Life 11 00215 g001
Figure 2. Duplicated Protein-coding genes in the mitogenome of Pseudocercospora fijiensis. (A) A truncated cox1 copy and a complete copy with an intron that are localized in tandem. (B) PCR amplification including intra and intergenic regions between truncated cox1 copies. (C) Pairwise alignments of truncated cox1 copies reveal a region of around 600 bp of low similarity between them (non-identical sites appear in black in the alignment). (D) Primers used for the amplification of both cox1 copies.
Figure 2. Duplicated Protein-coding genes in the mitogenome of Pseudocercospora fijiensis. (A) A truncated cox1 copy and a complete copy with an intron that are localized in tandem. (B) PCR amplification including intra and intergenic regions between truncated cox1 copies. (C) Pairwise alignments of truncated cox1 copies reveal a region of around 600 bp of low similarity between them (non-identical sites appear in black in the alignment). (D) Primers used for the amplification of both cox1 copies.
Life 11 00215 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of mitochondrial genome sizes among Mycosphaerellaceae and contribution of, Conserved Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes (CMPCGs), hypothetical proteins, Homing Endonuclease Genes (HEGs) related Open Reading Frames (ORFs) and accessory genes, to genetic content of mitochondrial genomes. Mitochondrial genomes of Mycosphaerellaceae members are different in terms of genome size, and content of accessory genes and HEGs. Some genomes contain only CMPCGs while others exhibit HEG invasion. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred here.
Figure 3. Comparison of mitochondrial genome sizes among Mycosphaerellaceae and contribution of, Conserved Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes (CMPCGs), hypothetical proteins, Homing Endonuclease Genes (HEGs) related Open Reading Frames (ORFs) and accessory genes, to genetic content of mitochondrial genomes. Mitochondrial genomes of Mycosphaerellaceae members are different in terms of genome size, and content of accessory genes and HEGs. Some genomes contain only CMPCGs while others exhibit HEG invasion. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred here.
Life 11 00215 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of Conserved Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes (CMPCGs) order and orientation among selected Mycosphaerellaceae species. Gene order is not conserved across members even for closely related species except for Sphaerulina species. Colored gene pairs were always recovered as neighbors; asterisks indicate atp8 is neighbor to cox1 in P. eumusae. Ellipsis in P. musae and P. eumusae mean these genomes were both recovered in different contigs each (two and three respectively); where nad6 and atp9 could not be assembled to any contig we not complete a circular mitogenome.
Figure 4. Comparison of Conserved Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes (CMPCGs) order and orientation among selected Mycosphaerellaceae species. Gene order is not conserved across members even for closely related species except for Sphaerulina species. Colored gene pairs were always recovered as neighbors; asterisks indicate atp8 is neighbor to cox1 in P. eumusae. Ellipsis in P. musae and P. eumusae mean these genomes were both recovered in different contigs each (two and three respectively); where nad6 and atp9 could not be assembled to any contig we not complete a circular mitogenome.
Life 11 00215 g004
Figure 5. P. fijiensis RT-PCR assay to confirm bicistronic expression of genes. (A) Primers were designed between neighboring genes with hypothesized bicistronic transcription. (B) Gel results of RT-PCR assays for gene pairs nad2-nad3, atp6-atp8 and its intergenic sequences, amplified bands have the expected sequence size. (C) Nucleotide sequences of designed primers.
Figure 5. P. fijiensis RT-PCR assay to confirm bicistronic expression of genes. (A) Primers were designed between neighboring genes with hypothesized bicistronic transcription. (B) Gel results of RT-PCR assays for gene pairs nad2-nad3, atp6-atp8 and its intergenic sequences, amplified bands have the expected sequence size. (C) Nucleotide sequences of designed primers.
Life 11 00215 g005
Figure 6. Mycosphaerellaceae Bayesian phylogeny and divergence time estimation. Mycosphaerellaceae Bayesian phylogeny with posterior probabilities in each branch and divergence time estimates calculated using fossil calibrations in BEAST2. Red star represents the fossil calibration placement.
Figure 6. Mycosphaerellaceae Bayesian phylogeny and divergence time estimation. Mycosphaerellaceae Bayesian phylogeny with posterior probabilities in each branch and divergence time estimates calculated using fossil calibrations in BEAST2. Red star represents the fossil calibration placement.
Life 11 00215 g006
Table 1. Characteristics and organization of annotated genes in the mitogenome of P. fijiensis.
Table 1. Characteristics and organization of annotated genes in the mitogenome of P. fijiensis.
GeneStart PositionStop PositionLength (bp)DirectionStart CodonStop CodonGC ContentsProduct
nad64351109675forwardATATAA23%subunit 6 of NADH dehydrogenase
nad5192270125091reverseATATAA24.8NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5
ORF1325350011749reverseATGTAA22.8hypothetical protein
LAGLIDADG50425722681reverseTTATAA24.4LAGLIDADG domain containing endonuclease
nad4L70097278270reverseTTATAA23.7NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L
trnN(gtt)9370944071reverse---tRNA-Asn
trnP(tgg)9480955273reverse---
ORF2960010271672reverseATGTAA29.9hypothetical protein
ORF31145211973522forwardTTATAG26.2hypothetical protein
ORF41248112969489forwardATGTAA33.5hypothetical protein
ORF51439915151753reverseATATAA-hypothetical protein
Large subunit rRNA15433214135981forward---large subunit ribosomal RNA
ORF61669917037339forwardATTTAA14.7hypothetical protein
cob23991262092219reverseTTATAA29.3cytochrome b
LAGLIDADG2474925492744reverse---LAGLIDADG domain containing endonuclease
trnH(gtg)268762694873reverse---tRNA-His
trnQ(ttg)269742704673reverse---tRNA-Gln
trnL1(tag)293712945484reverse---tRNA-Leu
trnF(gaa)295312960373reverse---tRNA-Phe
trnA(tgc)307703084172reverse---tRNA-Ala
trnE(ttc)311733124472reverse---tRNA-Glu
trnL2(taa)312533133583reverse---tRNA-Leu
trnM(cat)314783155073reverse---tRNA-Met
trnM(cat)315553162571reverse---tRNA-Met
trnT(tgt)317143178471reverse---tRNA-Thr
trnR(tct)320013207171reverse---tRNA-Arg
trnC(gca)321053217571reverse---tRNA-Cys
trnR(acg)322123229079reverse---tRNA-Arg
nad432730342201491reverseATATAA25.4NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4
ORF734319359021584reverseATGTAA22.9hypothetical protein
trnR(cct)368403691071reverse---tRNA-Arg
trnS2(tga)377753786288reverse---tRNA-Ser
trnI(gat)379113798272reverse---tRNA-Ile
trnW(tca)380193809072reverse---tRNA-Trp
trnS1(gct)381543823481reverse---tRNA-Ser
trnD(gtc)382793835173reverse---tRNA-Asp
trnG(tcc)384813855171reverse---tRNA-Gly
ORF83879839094297forwardATGTAG19.5hypothetical protein
cox34300743816810reverseATGTAA31.7Cytochrome c oxidase subunit III
atp94499945223225reverseATGATG40.9ATP Synthase Membrane Subunit 9
trnK(ttt)455064557873reverse---tRNA-Lys
trnV(tac)456074567973reverse---tRNA-Val
trnM(cat)459154598773reverse---tRNA-Met
cox24698947738750reverseTAATAA29.9cytochrome c oxidase subunit II
nad150440516001161forwardATGTAA30NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1
Small subunit rRNA51849537731925forward---small subunit ribosomal RNA
trnY(gta)537975388185forward---tRNA-Tyr
cox155837577081872forwardTTATAG32.2cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
ORF cytb-like5944259672231reverseTTATAA22.5cytb-like ORF
trnH(gtg)602916036373reverse---tRNA-His
trnQ(ttg)603896046173reverse---tRNA-Gln
ORF96080261359558forwardATGTAA35.1hypothetical protein
trnF(---)640386411174reverse---tRNA-Phe
trnA(tgc)641556422672reverse---tRNA-Ala
trnE(ttc)644986456972reverse---tRNA-Glu
ORF106471465247534reverseATATAG27hypothetical protein
trnI(tat)656726574473reverse---tRNA-Ile
trnM(cat)657496581971reverse---tRNA-Met
trnT(tgt)659086597871reverse---tRNA-Thr
trnR(tct)661826625271reverse---tRNA-Arg
trnC(gca)662866635671reverse---tRNA-Cys
trnR(acg)663936646573reverse---tRNA-Arg
ORF116827869276999reverseATGTAA21.5hypothetical protein
trnG(tcc)695236959371forward---tRNA-Gly
nad36976870139372reverseATGTAA27.2NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3
nad270140718191680reverseATGTAA24.5NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2
atp87260972758150forwardATTTAA24ATP Synthase Subunit 8
atp67280173589789forwardATATAA27.8ATP Synthase Subunit 6
Table 2. Comparison of mitogenomes of Pseudocercospora fijiensis and closely related species (Sphaerulina musiva, S. populicola, P. musae, P. eumusae and Zasmidium cellare, Zymoseptoria tritici). Intragenic (genic) regions include regions of standard CMPCGs (Conserved Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes), open reading frame (ORFs), rRNAs, and tRNAs. Intergenic regions include regions among standard CMPCGs, ORFs, rRNAs, and tRNAs.
Table 2. Comparison of mitogenomes of Pseudocercospora fijiensis and closely related species (Sphaerulina musiva, S. populicola, P. musae, P. eumusae and Zasmidium cellare, Zymoseptoria tritici). Intragenic (genic) regions include regions of standard CMPCGs (Conserved Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes), open reading frame (ORFs), rRNAs, and tRNAs. Intergenic regions include regions among standard CMPCGs, ORFs, rRNAs, and tRNAs.
Item P. musaeP. eumusaeP. fijiensisS. musivaS. populicolaZ. cellareZ. tritici
Genome size (bp)51,64559,23674,08953,234139,60623,74343,964
GC content (%) 27.802719.224.531.7027.8031.90
No. of introns 11262800
No. of standard Protein Coding Genes (CMPCGs) 14141414141414
No. of rRNAs 2222222
No. of tRNAs 24253829292527
Genic regions (%) 63.2540.7365.5565.0698.2579.3967.79
Intergenic regions (%) 36.7559.2746.4534.941.7520.5132.21
Number of GIY-YIG intragenic regions 0001500
Number of GIY-YIG intergenic regions 1100200
Number of LAGLIDADG intragenic regions 00031800
Number of LAGLIDADG intergenic regions 0021300
Number of Repetitive Sequences 32432982020
Table 3. Comparison between divergence time of some clades among different studies.
Table 3. Comparison between divergence time of some clades among different studies.
Present StudyChang et al. 2016
Molecular ClockRelaxed-Log normalStrict clockStrict clock
Type of Data13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes46 nuclear single-copy genes
Divergence Time estimation methodBayesian analysis in BEAST2 v2.5.1Bayesian analysis in BEAST2 v2.5.1Penalized likelihood analysis in the program r8s v1.7
Fossil calibrationCapnodiales-Metacapnodiaceae FossilCapnodiales- Metacapnodiaceae FossilDothideomycetes crown group
Capnodiales108.81 (100.17–121.35 MYA, 95% HPD)151.96 (101.04–232.179 MYA, 95% HPD)234.2–180.2 MYA
Mycosphaerellaceae66.66 (55.47–78.27 MYA, 95% HPD)97.24 (64.27–155 MYA, 95% HPD)186.7–143.6 MYA
Sphaerulina13.39 (9.39–17.69 MYA, 95% HPD)30.31 (19.69–48.63 MYA, 95% HPD)near 10 MYA
Pseudocercospora + Sphaerulina48.1 (39.34–57.86 MYA, 95% HPD)84.46 (55.6–134.54 MYA, 95% HPD)146.6–112.8 MYA
Pseudocercospora13.31 MYA (9.49–17.28 MYA, 95% HPD)27.66 MYA (17.8–44.27MYA, 95% HPD)39.9–30.6 MYA
P. eumusae + P. musae8.22 MYA (5.6–11.07 MYA, 95% HPD)17.87 MYA (11.5–28.71 MYA, 95% HPD)22.6–17.4 MYA
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arcila-Galvis, J.E.; Arango, R.E.; Torres-Bonilla, J.M.; Arias, T. The Mitochondrial Genome of a Plant Fungal Pathogen Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Mycosphaerellaceae), Comparative Analysis and Diversification Times of the Sigatoka Disease Complex Using Fossil Calibrated Phylogenies. Life 2021, 11, 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030215

AMA Style

Arcila-Galvis JE, Arango RE, Torres-Bonilla JM, Arias T. The Mitochondrial Genome of a Plant Fungal Pathogen Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Mycosphaerellaceae), Comparative Analysis and Diversification Times of the Sigatoka Disease Complex Using Fossil Calibrated Phylogenies. Life. 2021; 11(3):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arcila-Galvis, Juliana E., Rafael E. Arango, Javier M. Torres-Bonilla, and Tatiana Arias. 2021. "The Mitochondrial Genome of a Plant Fungal Pathogen Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Mycosphaerellaceae), Comparative Analysis and Diversification Times of the Sigatoka Disease Complex Using Fossil Calibrated Phylogenies" Life 11, no. 3: 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030215

APA Style

Arcila-Galvis, J. E., Arango, R. E., Torres-Bonilla, J. M., & Arias, T. (2021). The Mitochondrial Genome of a Plant Fungal Pathogen Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Mycosphaerellaceae), Comparative Analysis and Diversification Times of the Sigatoka Disease Complex Using Fossil Calibrated Phylogenies. Life, 11(3), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop