Next Article in Journal
Development of New Potential Inhibitors of β1 Integrins through In Silico Methods—Screening and Computational Validation
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuronal Activity during Exposure to Specific Phobia through fMRI: Comparing Therapeutic Components of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Does Metabolic Syndrome Affect the Incidence and Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Spotlight on the Role of Radiomics and Machine-Learning Applications in the Management of Intracranial Meningiomas: A New Perspective in Neuro-Oncology: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Adult-Onset Pilocytic Astrocytoma Predilecting Temporal Lobe: A Brief Review

1
Department of Neurosurgery, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital and Research Institute, Shahbagh, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, REM Radioterapia srl, 95029 Viagrande, Italy
3
Department of Neurosurgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbagh, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
4
Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital Agargaon, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
5
Division of Neurosurgery, Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
6
Department of Neurosurgery, Christian-Doppler- Klinik, Paracelsus Private Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
7
Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95126 Catania, Italy
8
Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
9
Department of Neurosurgery, ARNAS Garibaldi, 95123 Catania, Italy
10
Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi 110029, India
11
Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj 44300, Nepal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(7), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070931
Submission received: 14 February 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 21 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Early Career Stars in Physiology and Pathology)

Abstract

:
(1) Introduction: Adult-onset pilocytic astrocytoma (APA) accounts for only 1.5% of all brain tumors, and studies regarding APA are limited. This review is focused on the history, clinical course, cytogenetics, neuroimaging features, management, and outcome of APAs. (2) Methods: Using a systematic search protocol in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct databases, the authors extracted cases of APA predilecting the temporal lobe from inception to December 2020. Articles lacking necessary data were excluded from this study. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 23 statistical package software. (3) Results: A total of 32 patients, 14 (43.8%) males and 18 (56.2%) females, with a male/female ratio of 0.77/1, were grouped. The mean age of the patients was 34.22 ± 15.17 years, ranging from 19 to 75. The tumors were predominantly located in the left side. We have also discussed the clinical presentation, and headache was the most common complaint, followed by visual disturbance. Preoperative neuroimaging features demonstrated cystic lesions in 16 patients, with mural nodule in 5 patients; intracerebral hemorrhage was present in 1 patient, and solid enhancing mass was observed in 3 patients. Only our reported case presented as a solid calcified mass. Most of the patients (78.1%) underwent a gross total resection (GTR), only 5 (21.9%) underwent subtotal resection (STR). The outcome and prognosis history were excellent, and no recurrence was observed. (4) Conclusion: Most of the APAs of the temporal lobe follow benign clinical courses, but some patients exhibit aggressive clinical behavior. There was no history of recurrence after treatment at up to 27 years of follow-up.

1. Introduction

Pilocytic astrocytomas are slow-growing WHO grade I brain tumors that arise from astrocytes [1]. Adult-onset pilocytic astrocytomas (APAs) are also WHO grade 1 neoplasms, which account for only 1.5% of adult brain tumors. These tumors usually develop in children and can arise anywhere in the central nervous system. Most commonly, they are observed near the cerebellum, hypothalamic region, brainstem, or optic nerve [2]. The factors leading to development of pilocytic astrocytomas are still unknown, though there appears to be a genetic basis. PAs most often occur in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), tuberous sclerosis, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome [3,4].
In adults, APAs are very rare and, compared with pediatric patients, a large portion have an aggressive clinical course [5,6]. In the last few years, a great effort has been made by researchers to understand histological features and cytogenetic and molecular markers of these tumors [7,8].
Because of the rarity of APAs in the adult population, their biological behavior, molecular cytogenetics, clinical presentation, neuroimaging features, optimum management strategies, and outcome are restricted to case reports, case series, and a few original articles. In this paper, the authors present a case of APA involving the temporal lobe. The astrocytoma mimicked a calcified meningioma preoperatively, and it was confirmed as APA after histopathological analysis. The atypical imaging features led us to search for similar occurrences in the literature. The authors systematically reviewed all the reported cases, addressing APAs with a specific predilection to the temporal lobe to analyze their regional variation based on molecular cytogenetics, neuroimaging features, management strategies, and outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Selection

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct databases using the Mesh terms “pilocytic astrocytoma” AND “temporal lobe”. First, we considered all papers regarding adult-onset PA involving the temporal lobe, which included case reports, case series, and original articles. All the published papers were meticulously reviewed for necessary information. We restricted the screening language to English.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

All the available literature regarding adult-onset PA involving the temporal lobe, with or without extension into surrounding structures, was included and reviewed thoroughly. Inclusion criteria were 1. Age: >18 years; 2. New diagnosis of PA; 3. PA confirmed on histopathology; and 4. Articles containing information about the selected demographics, management as described by extent of resection, and outcome in terms of recurrence.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

Articles describing 1. Pediatric presentation of PA, 2. Location other than temporal lobe, and 3. Lack of information regarding the features mentioned above were excluded from the study.

2.4. Data Extraction

Using the selected keywords, a systematic search conducted on Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct databases identified 4535 potential articles from inception to December 2020. After careful screening, 42 articles were identified based on the title, abstract, and removal of duplicates. Of those 42 articles, 20 were excluded due to our exclusion criteria. After careful evaluation, 13 more articles were excluded because they lacked socio-demographic variables, information regarding management, and outcome. The study procedure is depicted in a PRISMA [9] flow diagram (Figure 1). Nine papers were considered for systematic review (Table 1).

3. Results

The authors selected nine articles for the analysis, with a total of 32 patients, 14 (43.8%) males and 18 (56.2%) females, after the inclusion of the present case. The mean age of presentation is 34.22 (±15.17) years, ranging from 19 to 75. Tumors were predominantly located in the left side. The clinical presentation varied: headache was the most common complaint, followed by visual disturbances. Preoperative neuroimaging features showed a cystic lesion in 16 patients, with mural nodule in 5 patients, intracerebral hematoma in 1 patient, solid enhancing mass in 3 patients. Only our reported case presented as a solid calcified mass. Most of the patients (78.1%) underwent gross total resection (GTR), and five underwent subtotal resection (STR). The prognosis was good, and no recurrence was observed at 6 months—26.5 years of follow-up.

3.1. Case Report

3.1.1. History and Examination

A 25-year-old female presented with progressive right-sided headaches for 5 months. She also complained of blurred vision. She had experienced convulsions twice, controlled well with phenytoin for 2 months. On examination, she was conscious, oriented to place and person. The neurological examination revealed left-sided homonymous hemianopia with normal visual acuity and fundoscopic findings. There were no other focal neurological deficits.

3.1.2. Preoperative Imaging

A brain CT scan performed at the time of convulsion onset detected a totally calcified lesion (4.6 × 3.6 cm) in the right temporal region, without any other abnormality (Figure 2A,B). A brain MRI with contrast showed a right petrous region mass measuring 4.6 × 3.6 × 3 cm. There was evidence of a dural tail, encasement of the right petrous bone region without contrast uptake by the lesion; these findings radiologically suggested a diagnosis of right middle fossa calcified meningioma, for which the patient was referred for neurosurgical evaluation and definitive management (Figure 3A–C).

3.1.3. Surgical Procedure

We performed a standard temporal craniotomy and reached the floor of the middle temporal fossa by rongeuring the overhanging bone (Figure 4). The dura was incised in ‘U’ shaped fashion, with the base directed inferiorly, then we performed en bloc removal following the four principles of meningioma surgery (Figure 5). Hemostasis was ensured. Watertight dural closure was obtained, and the wound was closed in layers, leaving no drain tube in situ.

3.1.4. Postoperative Course

The postoperative period was uneventful, with no new neurological deficits.

3.1.5. Histological Examination

Microscopic examination of the resected specimen demonstrated a biphasic appearance of tightly compacted cells with intervening looser areas. There were elongated Rosenthal fibers with eosinophilic proteinaceous inclusions. These features were consistent with the diagnosis of pilocytic astrocytoma.

3.1.6. Follow-Up

There was no evidence of recurrence at the follow-up CT scan after one year.

4. Discussion

We provide a case report and systematic review of PAs of the temporal lobe in adult patients. Our study examines the demographics, management, and outcomes of these lesions. In the ensuing discussion, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the molecular cytogenetics, neuroimaging features, management, and outcome of adult patients with temporal lobe PA.

4.1. Molecular Cytogenetics

The genetic events that cause the development of pilocytic astrocytoma are still not well known. Previously conducted studies have reported high chances of occurrence of low-grade glioma in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 [18]. There are also increased chances of mutations of BRAF, constant chromosome gains at 7q34, and mutations of KRAS activating the MAPK pathway in sporadic pilocytic astrocytoma [19,20,21]. Despite recent advances in the cytogenetics of pilocytic astrocytoma, the molecular blueprint of growth and development is still largely unexplained. Research suggests that the copy-number alterations might play an essential role in PA etiology [22].

4.2. Presentation and Neuroimaging Features

Generally, our study indicates that patients present with headache and/or visual disturbances. MRI is the diagnostic modality of choice. Mixed signal intensity in both T1 and T2 weighted sequences, with marked heterogeneous contrast enhancement, can be observed. Usually, as indicated by our study, they are cystic lesions surrounded by mild peritumoral edema [23].

4.3. Recommended Management Strategy

The results of this study emphasize the clinical heterogeneity that can be found in adult patients with PA. Surgery is considered the primary treatment of PA. The main goal should be the complete total macroscopic resection of the tumor in the first surgery attempt [24,25]. If the tumor cannot be resected completely, radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be attempted for the remaining sections. Additionally, these options may be utilized for patients who are not surgical candidates [26].
However, the role of radiotherapy in the postoperative management of remaining tumors is still unclear [27]: some studies show a benefit in survival or tumor control, while others show none [28,29,30]. Although exceedingly rare, cases of malignant transformation in pilocytic astrocytomas have been documented, which must be considered prior to considering adjuvant therapies [31,32]. Similarly, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still unclear [33]. Nevertheless, in young patients with a tumor that is inoperable or difficult to remove, chemotherapy can be of some use in delaying radiotherapy, thus preventing unwanted side effects of radiation, such as damage to the developing brain [34,35].
Clinicians must also be cognizant of those likely to be at increased risk for early recurrence and aggressive tumor behavior, that is, patients who have undergone subtotal tumor resections or biopsies, tumors with Ki-67 indices of 5% or more and/or high mitotic rates, and older age at presentation (i.e., >40 years). Patients in the high-risk categories above should be strongly considered for further adjuvant therapy with treatments such as conformal external beam irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgical boost, or chemotherapy [36].

4.4. Outcome

The study conducted by Brown et al. confirmed that adults with pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) have a favorable prognosis [37], but other studies contradict these results. A study conducted at the University of Bonn with a series of 44 adult patients reported 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates of 67% and 77%, respectively [38]. Another investigation involving 30 adult patients from Princess Margaret Hospital identified and noted 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates of 35% and 85%, respectively [36]. A review study of adult PA patients identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program confirmed younger age and greater extent of resection to be positive prognostic factors [39].
Many studies have shown a good prognosis if the tumor is resected completely. Some have deemed gross total resection (GTR) of APAs to be curative, resulting in superior outcomes when compared with subtotal resection (STR), and therefore GTR or complete resection is strongly recommended for patients with PA [40,41]. However, Ki-67 staining should be performed on all biopsied or resected PA tissue for prognostic purposes and to aid decisions regarding the need for further therapy [42,43].
The location of the tumors is also of great importance in determining the prognosis. Analysis of 865 adult patients with PA from the USA National Cancer Institute (NCI) SEER Program database, using univariate Cox proportional hazards model, revealed a low hazard ratio of death of 0.2 and p < 0.0001 for gross total resection compared with subtotal resection or biopsy [39]. Similarly, Stüer et al. found recurrence rates four times higher in patients who underwent partial resection than in those who had a complete resection [24]. No deaths or tumor recurrences were reported in our cohort of patients who have undergone complete resection.
Compared to other locations, pilocytic astrocytomas located in the brainstem have a very poor prognosis, as many structures vital for life lie inside it. Difficult access and incomplete resection are other factors that determine the bad prognosis in this region [35].

5. Conclusions

Most of the adult PAs of the temporal lobe follow a benign clinical course, with some patients exhibiting aggressive clinical behavior. There was no history of recurrence after treatment at up to 27 years of follow-up. Despite being classified as a WHO grade 1 neoplasm, PAs may sometimes present as ICH and mimic high-grade lesions in conventional neuroimaging. Maximal safe surgical resection should be the aim of surgery. Molecular markers and Ki-67 leveling index are necessary for targeted therapy to achieve a favorable outcome.

Author Contributions

Conception, diagnosis, design, and radiological diagnosis: K.K.B.; manuscript preparation, technical revision, manuscript editing, and revision: N.A.; literature search: R.H., S.B., O.T. and S.P.; final approval of manuscript: B.C., G.E.U., G.S., N.A.S., G.F. and K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

We are gratefully indebted to Nazmin Ahmed for the colorful illustration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ostrom, Q.T.; Gittleman, H.; Liao, P.; Vecchione-Koval, T.; Wolinsky, Y.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010–2014. Neuro-Oncology 2017, 19, v1–v88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rodriguez, F.J.; Perry, A.; Gutmann, D.H.; O’Neill, B.P.; Leonard, J.; Bryant, S.; Giannini, C. Gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1: A clinicopathologic study of 100 patients. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 67, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board. Adult Central Nervous System Tumors Treatment (PDQ®): Patient Version [Internet]. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries. 2002. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389458 (accessed on 6 August 2021).
  4. National Organization for Rare Diseases. Rare Disease Database: Astrocytoma [Internet]. Available online: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/astrocytoma/ (accessed on 6 August 2021).
  5. Favre, J.; Deruaz, J.P.; de Tribolet, N. Pilocytic cerebellar astrocytoma in adults: Case report. Surg. Neurol. 1993, 39, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Theeler, B.J.; Ellezam, B.; Sadighi, Z.S.; Mehta, V.; Tran, M.D.; Adesina, A.M.; Bruner, J.M.; Puduvalli, V.K. Adult pilocytic astrocytomas: Clinical features and molecular analysis. Neuro-Oncology 2014, 16, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sadighi, Z.; Slopis, J. Pilocytic astrocytoma: A disease with evolving molecular heterogeneity. J. Child Neurol. 2013, 28, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, S.; Mattar, P.; Dixit, R.; Lawn, S.O.; Wilkinson, G.; Kinch, C.; Eisenstat, D.; Kurrasch, D.M.; Chan, J.A.; Schuurmans, C. RAS/ERK signaling controls proneural genetic programs in cortical development and gliomagenesis. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 2169–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Garcia, D.M.; Fulling, K.H. Juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma of the cerebrum in adults. A distinctive neoplasm with favorable prognosis. J. Neurosurg. 1985, 63, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lyons, M.K. Pilocytic astrocytoma with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages in an elderly adult. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2007, 109, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, H.M.; Hsu, S.S.; Wang, J.S.; Weng, M.J.; Fu, J.H.; Chen, C.K.; Lai, P.H. Cerebral pilocytic astrocytoma with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in adults. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2008, 71, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ellis, J.A.; Waziri, A.; Balmaceda, C.; Canoll, P.; Bruce, J.N.; Sisti, M.B. Rapid recurrence and malignant transformation of pilocytic astrocytoma in adult patients. J. Neurooncol. 2009, 95, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kano, H.; Kondziolka, D.; Niranjan, A.; Flickinger, J.C.; Lunsford, L.D. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pilocytic astrocytomas part 1: Outcomes in adult patients. J. Neurooncol. 2009, 95, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kitamura, N.; Hasebe, T.; Kasai, R.; Kasuya, S.; Nakatsuka, T.; Kudo, H.; Higuchi, M.; Nakano, K.; Hiruta, N.; Kameda, N.; et al. Pilocytic astrocytomas in elderly adults. Neuroradiol. J. 2010, 23, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Brown, P.D.; Anderson, S.K.; Carrero, X.W.; O’Neill, B.P.; Giannini, C.; Galanis, E.; Shah, S.A.; Abrams, R.A.; Curran, W.J.; Buckner, J.C.; et al. Adult patients with supratentorial pilocytic astrocytoma: Long-term follow-up of ospective multicenter clinical trial NCCTG-867251 (alliance). Neuro-Oncol. Pract. 2015, 2, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Bond, K.M.; Hughes, J.D.; Porter, A.L.; Orina, J.; Fang, S.; Parney, I.F. Adult Pilocytic Astrocytoma: An Institutional Series and Systematic Literature Review for Extent of Resection and Recurrence. World Neurosurg. 2018, 110, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Narang, A.; Aggarwal, V.; Kavita, D.; Maheshwari, C.; Bansal, P. Cerebral pilocytic astrocytoma with spontaneous intratumoral haemorrhage in the elderly—A rare entity. Rom. Neurosurg. 2019, 23, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tada, K.; Kochi, M.; Saya, H.; Kuratsu, J.I.; Shiraishi, S.; Kamiryo, T.; Shinojima, N.; Ushio, A. Preliminary observations on genetic alterations in pilocytic astrocytomas associated with neurofibromatosis 1. Neuro-Oncology 2003, 5, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cin, H.; Meyer, C.; Herr, R.; Janzarik, W.G.; Lambert, S.; Jones, D.T.W.; Jacob, K.; Benner, A.; Witt, H.; Remke, M.; et al. Oncogenic FAM131B-BRAF fusion resulting from 7q34 deletion comprises an alternative mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 121, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bar, E.E.; Lin, A.; Tihan, T.; Burger, P.C.; Eberhart, C.G. Frequent gains at chromosome 7q34 involving BRAF in pilocytic astrocytoma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 67, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Aktas, O.N.; Tihan, T. The morphologic and molecular characteristics of pilocytic astrocytomas and the role of mapk pathway: What does not kill you makes you stronger. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2014, 21, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pećina-Šlaus, N.; Gotovac, K.; Kafka, A.; Tomas, D.; Borovečki, F. Genetic changes observed in a case of adult pilocytic astrocytoma revealed by array CGH analysis. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Salles, D.; Laviola, G.; Malinverni, A.C.; Stávale, J.N. Pilocytic Astrocytoma: A Review of General, Clinical, and Molecular Characteristics. J. Child Neurol. 2020, 35, 852–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kayama, T.; Tominaga, T.; Yoshimoto, T. Management of pilocytic astrocytoma. Neurosurg. Rev. 1996, 19, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adib, S.D.; Schuhmann, M.U.; Hempel, J.M.; Bornemann, A.; Zamora, R.E.; Tatagiba, M. Surgical management of primary and secondary pilocytic astrocytoma of the cerebellopontine angle (in adults and children) and review of the literature. Neurosurg. Rev. 2021, 44, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Parsons, M.W.; Ager, B.J.; Poppe, M.M.; Burt, L.M. Practice Patterns and Outcomes in Pilocytic Astrocytoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 105, E628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Murphy, E.S.; Parsai, S.; Kano, H.; Sheehan, J.P.; Martinez-Alvarez, R.; Martinez-Moreno, N.; Kondziolka, D.; Simonova, G.; Liscak, R.; Mathieu, D.; et al. Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for pilocytic astrocytoma: An international multiinstitutional study. J. Neurosurg. 2021, 134, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hadjipanayis, C.G.; Kondziolka, D.; Gardner, P.; Niranjan, A.; Dagam, S.; Flickinger, J.; Lunsford, L.D. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pilocytic astrocytomas when multimodal therapy is necessary. J. Neurosurg. 2002, 97, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cherlow, J.M.; Shaw, D.W.; Margraf, L.R.; Bowers, D.; Huang, J.; Fouladi, M.; Onar-Thomas, A.; Zhou, T.; Pollack, I.F.; Gajjar, A.; et al. Conformal Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Patients with Low-Grade Glioma: Results from the Children’s Oncology Group Phase 2 Study ACNS0221. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019, 103, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Müller, K.; Gnekow, A.; Falkenstein, F.; Scheiderbauer, J.; Zwiener, I.; Pietsch, T.; Warmuth-Metz, M.; Voges, J.; Nikkhah, G.; Flentje, M.; et al. Radiotherapy in pediatric pilocytic astrocytomas: A subgroup analysis within the prospective multicenter study HIT-LGG 1996 by the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH). Strahlenther. Und. Onkol. 2013, 189, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mansur, D.B.; Rubin, J.B.; Kidd, E.A.; King, A.A.; Hollander, A.S.; Smyth, M.D.; Limbrick, D.D.; Park, T.; Leonard, J.R. Radiation therapy for pilocytic astrocytomas of childhood. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011, 79, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chourmouzi, D.; Papadopoulou, E.; Konstantinidis, M.; Syrris, V.; Kouskouras, K.; Haritanti, A.; Karkavelas, G.; Drevelegas, A. Manifestations of pilocytic astrocytoma: A pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2014, 5, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Smolanka, V.; Smolanka, A. P16.09 Pilocytic astrocytomas: Comprehensive treatment approach. Neuro. Oncol. 2017, 19, iii111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Park, J.H.; Jung, N.; Kang, S.J.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, E.; Lee, H.J.; Jung, H.R.; Choe, M.; Shim, Y.J. Survival and Prognosis of Patients with Pilocytic Astrocytoma: A Single-Center Study. Brain Tumor Res. Treat. 2019, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Murakami, R.; Hirai, T.; Kitajima, M.; Fukuoka, H.; Toya, R.; Nakamura, H.; Toya, R.; Nakamura, H.; Yamashita, Y. Magnetic resonance imaging of pilocytic astrocytomas: Usefulness of the minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value for differentiation from high-grade gliomas. Acta Radiol. 2008, 49, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ishkanian, A.; Laperriere, N.J.; Xu, W.; Millar, B.-A.; Payne, D.; Mason, W.; Sahgal, A. Upfront observation versus radiation for adult pilocytic astrocytoma. Cancer 2011, 117, 4070–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brown, P.D.; Buckner, J.C.; O’Fallon, J.R.; Iturria, N.L.; Brown, C.A.; O’Neill, B.P.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Dinapoli, R.P.; Arusell, R.M.; Abrams, R.A.; et al. Adult patients with supratentorial pilocytic astrocytomas: A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stüer, C.; Vilz, B.; Majores, M.; Becker, A.; Schramm, J.; Simon, M. Frequent recurrence and progression in pilocytic astrocytoma in adults. Cancer 2007, 110, 2799–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Johnson, D.R.; Brown, P.D.; Galanis, E.; Hammack, J.E. Pilocytic astrocytoma survival in adults: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute. J. Neurooncol. 2012, 108, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wade, A.; Hayhurst, C.; Amato-Watkins, A.; Lammie, A.; Leach, P. Cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma in adults: A management paradigm for a rare tumour. Acta Neurochir. 2013, 155, 1431–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ye, J.M.; Ye, M.J.; Kranz, S.; Lo, P. A 10 year retrospective study of surgical outcomes of adult intracranial pilocytic astrocytoma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 21, 2160–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shivaprasad, N.; Satish, S.; Ravishankar, S.; Vimalambike, M. Ki-67 immunostaining in astrocytomas: Association with histopathological grade-A South Indian study. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2016, 7, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.
Life 12 00931 g001
Figure 2. Brain CT scan: axial (A) and coronal (B) images demonstrate an irregular calcified lesion occupying the right middle temporal fossa, anterior to the petrous part of the temporal bone, with minimum mass effect. These features are consistent with middle skull base calcified meningioma.
Figure 2. Brain CT scan: axial (A) and coronal (B) images demonstrate an irregular calcified lesion occupying the right middle temporal fossa, anterior to the petrous part of the temporal bone, with minimum mass effect. These features are consistent with middle skull base calcified meningioma.
Life 12 00931 g002
Figure 3. Brain MRI: T1WI (A) and T2WI (B) axial sections showing a predominantly hypointense lesion with some scattered hyperintense areas, located in the right temporal lobe. The lesion seems to be intra-axial in this sequence. Mass effect is evident by compression on adjacent sulci and gyri with effacement of the right ventricle temporal horn. However, there is no shift of the midline structures. After gadolinium, there is no enhancement (C).
Figure 3. Brain MRI: T1WI (A) and T2WI (B) axial sections showing a predominantly hypointense lesion with some scattered hyperintense areas, located in the right temporal lobe. The lesion seems to be intra-axial in this sequence. Mass effect is evident by compression on adjacent sulci and gyri with effacement of the right ventricle temporal horn. However, there is no shift of the midline structures. After gadolinium, there is no enhancement (C).
Life 12 00931 g003
Figure 4. Schematic drawing of the brain: coronal section at the level of the mid-pons demonstrates the topographic relationship of the tumor with the surrounding neurovascular structures in our reported case. The craniotomy area is marked in blue, and durotomy is marked in green.
Figure 4. Schematic drawing of the brain: coronal section at the level of the mid-pons demonstrates the topographic relationship of the tumor with the surrounding neurovascular structures in our reported case. The craniotomy area is marked in blue, and durotomy is marked in green.
Life 12 00931 g004
Figure 5. Macroscopic appearance of the tumor, removed en bloc, showing a yellowish-red lesion, measuring approximately 6 × 5 cm, irregular lobulated surface with a hard consistency.
Figure 5. Macroscopic appearance of the tumor, removed en bloc, showing a yellowish-red lesion, measuring approximately 6 × 5 cm, irregular lobulated surface with a hard consistency.
Life 12 00931 g005
Table 1. Reported cases of adult-onset pilocytic astrocytoma of the temporal lobe.
Table 1. Reported cases of adult-onset pilocytic astrocytoma of the temporal lobe.
CaseAuthorYearAgeSexSiteClinical
Presentation
NeuroimagingManagementOutcome
1Garcia and Fulling [10]198524FLHACystic with mural noduleGTRNo recurrence at 27 years
2 27FLHACystic with mural noduleGTRNo recurrence at 27 years
3Lyons [11]200775MLAphasiaICHGTRNM
4Li et al. [12]200832MRHA, neck stiffnessCystic with mural noduleGTRNo recurrence at 6 months
5 34MLHA, visual disturbancesCystic with mural noduleGTRNo recurrence at 6 months
6Ellis et al. [13]200924FLTinnitusCysticGTRNo recurrence at 29 months
7 25MRVisual disturbancesCysticGTRNo recurrence at 27 months
8Kano et al. [14]200926FMNMSolidGTRNo recurrence at 75.5 months
9 19MMNMSolidSTRNo recurrence at 100 months
10 32FMNMCysticSTRNo recurrence at 18.6 months
11Kitamura et al. [15]201068MRHomonymous quadrantanopiaCystic with mural noduleGTRNo recurrence
12 72FRHA, nausea, vomitingSolid enhancing massGTRNo recurrence
13Brown et al. [16]201520MRNMNMGTRNo recurrence at 24 years
14 32MLNMNMGTRNo recurrence at 26.5 years
15 21FLNMNMGTRNo recurrence at 25.8 years
16 46MLNMNMGTRNo recurrence at 25.1 years
17 40FLNMNMGTRNo recurrence at 24.5 years
18 22MRNMNMSTRNo recurrence at 21.1 years
19 32FRNMNMGTRNo recurrence at 14.2 years
20 32FLNMNMSTRNo recurrence at 9.5 years
21Bond et al. [17]201819MNMSeizureCystic GTRNo recurrence at 97 months
22 20FNMSeizureSolid enhancing massGTRNo recurrence at 134 months
23 24FNMSeizureSolid enhancing massGTRNo recurrence at 26 months
24 27FNMSeizureCystic GTRNo recurrence at 22 months
25 28MNMSeizureCystic NTRNo recurrence at 65 months
26 30FNMMass effectCystic STRNo recurrence at 116.7 months
27 36FNMSeizure Cystic BiopsyNo recurrence at 164 months
28 40MNMSeizure Cystic GTRNo recurrence at 89 months
29 41MNMSeizure Cystic GTRNo recurrence at 79 months
30 42FNMSeizure Cystic GTRNo recurrence at 68 months
31Narang et al. [18]201960FLAltered sensorium, speech difficultiesMarginally enhancing mass with ICHGTRNM
32Present case202125FRHeadache, seizure, visual disturbancesSolid calcified massGTRNo recurrence at 6 months
HA: headache, ICH: intracranial hemorrhage, M: male, F: female, R: right, L: left, NM: not mentioned, GTR: gross total resection, NTR: near-total resection, STR: subtotal resection, RT: radiotherapy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, N.; Ferini, G.; Barua, K.K.; Halder, R.; Barua, S.; Priola, S.; Tomasi, O.; Umana, G.E.; Shlobin, N.A.; Scalia, G.; et al. Adult-Onset Pilocytic Astrocytoma Predilecting Temporal Lobe: A Brief Review. Life 2022, 12, 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070931

AMA Style

Ahmed N, Ferini G, Barua KK, Halder R, Barua S, Priola S, Tomasi O, Umana GE, Shlobin NA, Scalia G, et al. Adult-Onset Pilocytic Astrocytoma Predilecting Temporal Lobe: A Brief Review. Life. 2022; 12(7):931. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Nazmin, Gianluca Ferini, Kanak Kanti Barua, Rathin Halder, Sudip Barua, Stefano Priola, Ottavio Tomasi, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana, Nathan A. Shlobin, Gianluca Scalia, and et al. 2022. "Adult-Onset Pilocytic Astrocytoma Predilecting Temporal Lobe: A Brief Review" Life 12, no. 7: 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070931

APA Style

Ahmed, N., Ferini, G., Barua, K. K., Halder, R., Barua, S., Priola, S., Tomasi, O., Umana, G. E., Shlobin, N. A., Scalia, G., Garg, K., & Chaurasia, B. (2022). Adult-Onset Pilocytic Astrocytoma Predilecting Temporal Lobe: A Brief Review. Life, 12(7), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop