Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Gut Bacterial Communities of Asian Citrus Psyllid (Diaphorina citri) Reared on Different Host Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Exclusion and Repulsion of Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Using Selected Coverings on High Tunnel Structures for Primocane Red Raspberry
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Monochamus alternatus Galleries Using CT Scans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimising Vine Weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus F. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Monitoring Tool Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Life Table Construction under Different Temperatures and Insecticide Susceptibility Analysis of Uroleucon formosanum (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

1
College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(8), 693; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13080693
Submission received: 7 July 2022 / Revised: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 24 July 2022 / Published: 1 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Horticultural Crops)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Aphids are major crop pests worldwide, and in China, Uroleucon formosanum is a common aphid pest of lettuce. However, there is little basic and applied information on the control of this pest. To obtain the basic information of this pest, a life table of U. formosanum under different temperatures was constructed. Also, the susceptibility of U. formosanum to six common-used insecticides (chlorpyrifos, abamectin, beta-cypermethrin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, and thiamethoxam) was evaluated. Results showed that U. formosanum was not suitable to a lower temperature (17 °C), and U. formosanum was relatively sensitive to all six test insecticides. These data may help us to develop integrated management strategies for better population control of U. formosanum.

Abstract

Uroleucon formosanum is an important aphid pest of lettuce, but basic information on its biology is scarce. In this study, effects of three constant temperatures (17, 21, and 25 °C, simulating the mean temperature range in greenhouses) on the development and fecundity of U. formosanum were analyzed by constructing a life table. U. formosanum could develop and reproduce under all three temperatures, but the survival rate, development, and fecundity of U. formosanum were affected by temperature. The intrinsic rate of increase was lowest at 17 °C (0.17) and it was significantly less than at 21 °C (0.20) and 25 °C (0.23). Furthermore, U. formosanum had the lowest finite rate of increase (1.19) and the largest mean generation time (20.21) at 17 °C. These results mean that U. formosanum is less adapted to the lower temperatures (17 °C) among these three set temperatures. To screen insecticides for control, susceptibility of U. formosanum to six insecticides including chlorpyrifos, abamectin, beta-cypermethrin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, and thiamethoxam was evaluated. U. formosanum was relatively sensitive to all six test insecticides. Chlorpyrifos had the highest toxicity to U. formosanum (LC50 = 3.08 mg/L). These data may help to develop integrated management strategies for better population control of U. formosanum.

1. Introduction

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is a leafy vegetable that is planted worldwide. In 2020, world production of lettuce exceeded 27 million tons, and China produced the highest amount at 14.3 million tons (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO). Major economic losses to lettuce are caused by pests such as beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua, western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis, cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni, and several aphid species [1,2,3,4].
Aphids include many important pests of agriculture, horticulture, and forestry. They can directly damage plants by sap-feeding, and indirectly damage plants by honeydew secretion or virus transmission [2,5]. On lettuce, Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosley), Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) are frequent aphid pests [6]. Among these aphids, N. ribisnigri is considered to be the main pest on lettuce and is often referred to as the lettuce aphid. There are many studies on integrated control of this insect, combining chemical insecticide applications and the use of biological control [3,6,7]. However, N. ribisnigri is mainly distributed in the temperate regions of Europe, North and South America, and Australia [4,6,7]. In China. studies on N. ribisnigri are limited because N. ribisnigri was previously not found there and was listed as a quarantine pest [4]. In Eastern Asia, another pest aphid, Uroleucon formosanum, damages lettuce plants. The Uroleucon genus contains many species that have been recorded to feed on the Asteraceae without host alternation [8,9]. In Eastern Asia, U. formosanum is commonly recorded feeding on Asteraceae species in the genera Lactuca, Ixeris, Picris, and Sonchus [10]. U. formosanum extracts leaf sap by suction and reduces the yield and quality of the vegetables it attacks. In addition to causing direct damage, lettuce aphids also cause commercial damage due to the presence of living aphids, which contaminate the lettuce and render it unacceptable to consumers [6]. Occurrence of U. formosanum was very serious in greenhouses in Yangzhou, and there is an urgent need to control this pest. However, there is little information available on its basic biology. Most studies on U. formosanum have focused on its taxonomy, morphology, host range, phylogeny, and evolution [9,10,11]. The lack of basic biological information has made it more difficult to develop effective control strategies.
The life table is a powerful tool used to collect information on the growth, survival, reproduction, and intrinsic rate of increase of insect populations. This basic information can help us to establish more effective management tactics [12,13]. In this study, the life table parameters of U. formosanum were studied under constant temperatures (lettuce greenhouse temperatures). Additionally, six commonly used insecticides were used in bioassays to determine the most effective insecticides for U. formosanum control. This study provides basic information on U. formosanum and may aid in the development of integrated management strategies for aphid control.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Colony

U. formosanum aphids were originally collected from an L. sativa field in Yangzhou, China in 2020 and then maintained on fresh leaves of L. sativa in climate incubators under the conditions of 21 ± 1 °C, 70–75% relative humidity and a 14:10 h (L:D) photoperiod.

2.2. Life Table Construction under Constant Temperature

Based on the common temperature range in lettuce greenhouses (17–25 °C), three constant temperatures (17, 21 and 25 °C) were established to study the nymph development and adult reproduction of U. formosanum. For observation of nymph and adult development, five U. formosanum adults were transferred onto a lettuce leaf disk and then placed upside on a wet filter paper in a plastic dish (35 mm diam.). Six hours later, one newborn nymph was retained, and the other aphids (both adults and nymphs) were removed using a soft brush. The molting of newborn U. formosanum was observed and recorded every 24 h until all aphids were dead. Forty newborn nymphs were used to conduct the life table analysis. During the reproductive period, the newborn nymphs were counted and then removed using a soft brush every 24 h until the adult died.

2.3. Insecticide Bioassay

To evaluate the efficiency of commonly used insecticides labeled for aphid control, six insecticides, chlorpyrifos (97% purity, Qixing Pesticide Company, Yuncheng, China), abamectin (95% purity, Qixing Pesticide Company, Yuncheng, China), beta-cypermethrin (96% purity, Qixing Pesticide Company, Yuncheng, China), imidacloprid (96% purity, Suling Pesticide & Chemical Company, Yangzhou, China), nitenpyram (95% purity, Liben Pesticide & Chemical Company, Lianyungang, China), and thiamethoxam (95% purity, Qixing Pesticide Company, Yuncheng, China), were chosen to conduct bioassays using the leaf-dipping method [14]. Pure insecticides were first diluted with acetone to 10,000 mg/L stock solutions. For bioassays, stock solutions were diluted to serial concentrations (based on the results of preliminary testing) using ultrapure water containing 0.05% Triton X-100 (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Lettuce leaf disks were immersed in insecticide solution for 10 s. After natural drying (approximately 10 min), 20 adult aphids (three days old) were transferred onto each treated leaf disk. After 24 h, the aphids that were immobile or unable to walk after being gently prodded with a soft brush were considered to be dead and were recorded. Aphids treated with 0.05% Triton X-100 water were used as the control to assess natural mortality. The experiments were replicated three times for each insecticide and its dilutions.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Raw life history data were analyzed based on the theory of an age-stage, two-sex life table. The life history data, survival, longevity and fecundity of U. formosanum under different constant temperatures were analyzed using the TWOSEX-MS Chart program [15]. The age-stage-specific survival rate, age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx), age-specific maternity (lxmx), age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) were calculated [15]. The population parameters, intrinsic rate of increase (r), net reproductive rate (R0), finite rate of increase (λ) and the mean generation time (T) of U. formosanum under different constant temperatures were analyzed. These parameters were calculated using the following formulas. The means and standard errors of developmental duration, as well as the fecundity and population parameters, were analyzed using bootstrapping methods in TWOSEX-MS Chart program with 10,000 resamples [16]. For the insecticide bioassay, adjusted mortality data were subjected to probit analysis and the median lethal concentration (LC50), 95% confidence interval, and slope were calculated using SPSS (v. 20).

3. Results

The durations of all developmental stages (four nymph stages and the adult stage) of U. formosanum under different temperatures are listed in Table 1. The shortest total longevity (17.18 ± 1.33 d) duration was observed at 25 °C with a significant difference compared to 17 °C (19.05 ± 1.69 d) and 21 °C (19.08 ± 1.11 d). At 25 °C, U. formosanum had reduced total longevity but the longest adult longevity (13.24 ± 1.09 d) and the corresponding shortest preadult duration (6.25 ± 0.26 d). The age-stage-specific survival rate is shown in Figure 1A. The survival of U. formosanum nymphs reared at 21 °C (92.5%) was higher than at 17 °C (80.0%) and 25 °C (85.0%). The age-stage life expectancy (exj) indicated the time that an aphid on age x and stage y is expected to live. The exj curve showed that U. formosanum has the largest and shortest life expectancy at 17 °C and 25 °C, respectively (Figure 2).

3.1. Effect of Temperature on the Fecundity of Uroleucon formosanum

APRP (adult prereproductive period) and TPRP (total prereproductive period) decreased with increasing temperature and the shortest APRP (1.38 ± 0.09 d) and TPRP (9.19 ± 0.18 d) were found at 25 °C. These values were significantly different compared to the longest APRP (2.07 ± 0.17 d) and TPRP (13.83 ± 0.18 d) at 17 °C. The greatest fecundity (32.57 ± 1.84 nymphs per female) of U. formosanum occurred at 21 °C, and the lowest fecundity (25.31 ± 1.83 nymphs per female) occurred at 25 °C. The survival rate (lx) and age-specific fecundity (mx) of U. formosanum under the three temperatures are shown in Figure 1B. The mx curve was relatively flat at 21 °C compared to 17 °C and 25 °C, and reached a peak at the age of 22 d (4.92 offspring/d). The mx curve of 17 °C and 25 °C had larger fluctuations, and the highest age-specific fecundity occurred at the age of 20 d (5.67 offspring/d) and 12 d (5.89 offspring/d), respectively. In combination with the survival rate lx, the maximum lxmx values were at the age of 20 d (2.44 offspring), 12 d (3.19 offspring), and 12 d (4.30 offspring) at 17, 21, and 25 °C, respectively.

3.2. Life Table Parameters

The life table parameters of U. formosanum, reared at different temperatures, are presented in Table 2. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) of U. formosanum increased with temperature, and the highest r (0.23 ± 0.00) occurred at 25 °C. The finite rate of increase (λ) showed the same tendency as r and the highest λ (1.26 ± 0.00) of U. formosanum occurred at 25 °C. U. formosanum reared at 17 °C had the lowest r (0.17 ± 0.01), λ (1.19 ± 0.01) and the largest mean generation time (T) (20.21 ± 0.49). The mean generation time (T) decreased with temperature, and the shortest T (13.81 ± 0.47) occurred at 25 °C. The largest net reproductive rate R0 (32.58 ± 1.84) occurred at 21 °C, while U. formosanum had the lowest R0 at 25 °C.

3.3. Insecticide Bioassay

Chlorpyrifos, abamectin, beta-cypermethrin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram and thiamethoxam were used to conduct bioassays of U. formosanum. The results, including the determination of LC50 values, are shown in Table 3. U. formosanum had different susceptibility to these six insecticides. The order of toxicity of the insecticides to U. formosanum, from high to low, was as follows: chlorpyrifos, abamectin, beta cypermethrin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, and thiamethoxam; the LC50 values of these insecticides were 3.08, 14.33, 17.67, 30.67, 36.57, and 46.89 mg/L, respectively. Chlorpyrifos had the highest toxicity to U. formosanum.

4. Discussion

Aphids are major crop pests worldwide, and in China, U. formosanum is a common aphid pest of lettuce. However, there is little basic and applied information on the control of this pest. Because China produces considerable amounts of lettuce, it is important to understand the features of this main aphid pest of lettuce [17]. To improve production efficiency, most lettuce is planted in greenhouses with temperatures which range from 17–25 °C (mean = 21 °C) [18]. These temperatures are suitable for lettuce growth, but also promote the development of pests on lettuce. Temperature is a crucial factor affecting insect development, fecundity behavior and fitness [19,20]. Insect life tables have been extensively used to analyze and understand the effects of environmental factors, including temperature, on the survival, growth, and reproduction of insects [21,22,23]. Life tables have also been widely applied in the study of insect population ecology and pest management. However, life table research on Uroleucon is limited. Temperature effects on Uroleucon ambrosiae were reported, and weather parameter effects on the population dynamics of U. compositae were described [18,24]. Our study demonstrated that U. formosanum can develop and reproduce at constant temperatures ranging from 17–25°C, and that the temperature has a significant effect on the development, reproduction, and population parameters of U. formosanum.
The total longevity of U. formosanum was longer at the lower temperature (17 °C), and the nymph longevity (from first instar to fourth instar) was also longer at 17 °C. This phenomenon was also found in most aphid species, including another lettuce aphid U. ambrosiae (Table 2). However, the longest adult longevity occurred at 25 °C. APRP and TPRP were temperature-dependent from 17–25 °C. They decreased with temperature, and this tendency has been reported in many other insects including several aphid species [13,18,22]. The role of temperature in accelerating the population growth of herbivores by shortening development time has been described in numerous species [13]. Temperature has significant effects on development rates and behavior of insects. It is a systematic work to study the effect of temperature (both constant and fluctuating temperature) on this pest. In this study, three constant temperatures were set to obtain some basic biological information of U. formosanum. Fluctuating temperature is more realistic than constant temperature in natural conditions, and models built under fluctuating temperature may improve the predictions of the establishment and spread of insects [25,26,27]. This will be our further research: to study the development of U. formosanum under a wider set of fluctuating temperatures.
Although U. formosanum had the longest adult stage at 25 °C, it had the lowest fecundity (25.31 ± 1.83 nymphs per female) among the three temperatures. The highest fecundity (32.58 ± 1.84 nymphs per female) occurred at 21 °C. While at 17 °C, U. formosanum had the lowest intrinsic rate of increase, a finite rate of increase, and the largest mean generation time. Based on these parameters, U. formosanum was not suitable to 17 °C among these three constant temperatures.
The most important life table parameters for describing population growth were analyzed in this study. The intrinsic rate of increase r and finite rate of increase λ increased with temperature. Increases of r and λ have been recorded in aphids at a range of temperatures (from 20–25 °C) including U. ambrosiae and Aulacorthum solani [18,28]. In contrast to the two parameters above, the net reproductive rate R0 was not temperature-dependent and reached a peak at 21 °C. From these results, 21 °C appears to be the most optimal temperature for U. formosanum. In addition, at 21 °C, the age-specific fecundity (mx curve) stability was better than at the other two temperatures.
There is little information, especially related to control strategies, about U. formosanum on lettuce. Using natural enemies to control aphids on lettuce is a feasible method. Conti et al. compared the development of the parasitoid Praon volucre feeding on Macrosiphum euphorbiae (the common host of P. volucre) and U. ambrosiae under a constant temperature 22 ± 1 °C. It seems that P. volucre was a good candidate for biocontrol of aphids on lettuce [29]. Similarly, Shrestha et al. reported that Aphelinus abdominalis has the potential to be used against N. ribisnigri on lettuce [30]. However, it was not clear if these natural enemies can be used to control U. formosanum. Therefore, several insecticides commonly used to control aphids were selected to conduct bioassays to screen for efficient insecticides. U. formosanum was most sensitive to chlorpyrifos, with an LC50 of 3.08 mg/L. For many aphids, including Rhopalosiphum padi, Sitobion avenae, and Metopolophium dirhodum, the LC50 of chlorpyrifos is less than 10 mg/L [31,32]. These data indicated that U. formosanum has minimal resistance to the organophosphate chlorpyrifos. Although organophosphates were frequently used in the past and selected for resistance in target pests, it has been reported that resistance to organophosphates can decline rapidly over several years if the use of these insecticides is discontinued [33]. Abamectin is a microbial-derived pesticide frequently used to control insects, mites and nematodes owing to its high efficiency, low residues, broad-spectrum activity, and relative safety to humans, animals, and the environment [34,35]. For many of the aphids studied, most LC50 values of abamectin were at a low level (less than 15 mg/L), and the LC50 of M. dirhodum was 1.60 mg/L (LC50) [32]. In U. formosanum, the LC50 of abamectin was also less than 15 mg/L (14.33 mg/L), which indicates that abamectin can also be an efficient insecticide to control this aphid species. The pyrethroid beta-cypermethrin has been applied to control agricultural pests for over 30 years because of its high efficacy, safety, broad spectrum of activity and low human toxicity [36]. However, resistance to pyrethroids has been reported in many insect pests. For M. dirhodum and R. padi, the susceptibility baseline of beta-cypermethrin was 0.52 mg/L and 1.2 mg/L, and LC50 values of most field populations ranged from 2.6–22.8 mg/L [31,32]. In contrast to the bioassay results of M. dirhodum and R. padi field populations, U. formosanum had normal susceptibility to beta-cypermethrin. Furthermore, beta-cypermethrin continues to be an efficient insecticide for control of U. formosanum. Neonicotinoids are commonly used against sap-feeding insect pests [32]. We chose three neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and nitenpyram) for bioassay evaluation. The LC50 values of these three insecticides, from low–high in order, were 30.67 mg/L (imidacloprid), 36.57 mg/L (nitenpyram) and 46.89 mg/L (thiamethoxam). Neonicotinoids are the main insecticides used to control aphids. With the extensive application of these insecticides, high resistance has been reported in the field populations of several aphid species [5]. Compared to the susceptibility baseline of these insecticides to other aphids, U. formosanum may have developed low resistance (approximately 20–30 fold) to neonicotinoids. Though the resistance level is not high, and neonicotinoids can still be used to control U. formosanum, there is a risk that U. formosanum may ultimately develop high resistance to neonicotinoids. Based on the bioassay results, all these insecticides can still be used to efficiently control this aphid pest. However, resistance remains a problem for sustainability of pest control in instances where chemical insecticides continue to be frequently used. Rotation or combination use of different kinds of insecticides may help slow the development of resistance. The use of neonicotinoids should be prudent.

5. Conclusions

The development and fecundity of U. formosanum on lettuce were investigated under three constant temperatures (17, 21 and 25 °C). Additionally, the susceptibility of U. formosanum to six commonly used insecticides (chlorpyrifos, abamectin, beta-cypermethrin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, and thiamethoxam) was evaluated. Results indicated that U. formosanum was not suitable to lower temperature (17 °C) among these set temperatures, and that U. formosanum was relatively sensitive to all six test insecticides. These data may help us to develop integrated management strategies for better population control of U. formosanum.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-X.J., X.-Q.L., S.Z. and Y.-Z.Y.; methodology, T.-X.J., C.-C.Q. and H.-H.S.; formal analysis, T.-X.J., C.-C.Q., J.A and X.-Q.L.; investigation, T.-X.J., C.-C.Q., A.J. and X.-Q.L.; Resources, T.-X.J., H.-H.S. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, T.-X.J., C.-C.Q. and S.Z.; writing—review and editing, T.-X.J., X.-Q.L., H.-H.S., S.Z. and Y.-Z.Y.; supervision, Y.-Z.Y.; project administration, T.-X.J. and Y.-Z.Y.; funding acquisition, T.-X.J. and Y.-Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32102192.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dentist Zhou for her company in Yangzhou.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haile, F.J.; Kerns, D.L.; Richardson, J.M.; Higley, L.G. Impact of insecticides and surfactant on lettuce physiology and yield. J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, Y.B.; Mccreight, J.D. Responses of Nasonovia ribisnigri (Homoptera: Aphididae) to susceptible and resistant lettuce. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hopper, J.V.; Nelson, E.H.; Daane, K.M.; Mills, N.J. Growth, development and consumption by four syrphid species associated with the lettuce aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri, in California. Biol. Control 2011, 58, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, X.; Liu, Y.B. Nitric oxide fumigation for postharvest pest control on lettuce. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Simon, J.C.; Peccoud, J. Rapid evolution of aphid pests in agricultural environments. Curr. Opin. Insect. Sci. 2018, 26, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Morales, I.; Diaz, B.M.; Hermoso de Mendoza, A.; Nebreda, M.; Fereres, A. The development of an economic threshold for Nasonovia ribisnigri (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on lettuce in central Spain. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walker, M.K.; Stufkens, M.A.W.; Wallace, A.R. Indirect non-target effects of insecticides on Tasmanian brown lacewing (Micromus tasmaniae) from feeding on lettuce aphid (Nasonovia ribisnigri). Biol. Control 2007, 43, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kanturski, M.; Lee, Y. Hitherto unknown and poorly known sexual morphs of three Asiatic species of the aphid genus Uroleucon (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bonn Zool. Bull. 2020, 69, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Choi, H.; Kim, H.; Lee, W.; Lee, S. The genus Uroleucon (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in the Korean peninsula, with descriptions of two new species. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2019, 22, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Blackman, R.L.; Eastop, V.F. Aphids on the World’s Herbaceous Plants and Shrubs; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: London, UK, 2006; Volume 1, p. 400. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moran, N.A.; Kaplan, M.E.; Gelsey, M.J.; Murphy, T.G.; Scholes, E.A. Phylogenetics and evolution of the aphid genus Uroleucon based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Entomol. 1999, 24, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Maia, A.H.; Luiz, A.J.B.; Campanhola, C. Statistical inference on associated fertility life table parameters using jackknife technique: Computational aspects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xie, H.; Zhao, L.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Ni, X.; Cai, W.; He, K. Changes in life history parameters of Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae) under four different elevated temperature and CO2 combinations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ullah, F.; Gul, H.; Tariq, K.; Desneux, N.; Gao, X.; Song, D. Acetamiprid resistance and fitness costs of melon aphid, Aphis gossypii: An age-stage, two-sex life table study. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 171, 104729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wei, M.; Chi, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, L.; Ma, R. Demography of Cacopsylla chinensis (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) reared on four cultivars of Pyrus bretschneideri (Rosales: Rosaceae) and P. communis pears with estimations of confidence intervals of specific life table statistics. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 2343–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Z.; Han, Y.; Ning, K.; Luo, C.; Sheng, W.; Wang, S.; Fan, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q. Assessing the performance of different irrigation systems on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in the greenhouse. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Auad, A.M.; Moraes, J. Biological aspects and life table of Uroleucon ambrosiae (Thomas, 1878) as a function of temperature. Sci. Agric. 2003, 60, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahn, J.J.; Choi, K.S.; Koh, S. Effects of temperature on the development, fecundity, and life table parameters of Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2018, 54, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Golizadeh, A.; Kamali, K.; Fathipour, Y.; Abbasipour, H. Effect of temperature on life table parameters of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on two brassicaceous host plants. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2009, 12, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luis, A.; Xavier, P. Effect of high temperature on the growth and reproduction of corn aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) and implications for their population dynamics on the Northeastern Iberian peninsula. J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 30, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, W.; Yang, Y.; Xie, W.; Wu, Q.; Xu, B.; Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. Effects of temperature on the age-stage, two-sex life table of Bradysia odoriphaga (Diptera: Sciaridae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tabebordbar, F.; Shishehbor, P.; Ebrahimi, E.; Polaszek, A.; Ugine, T.A. Effect of different constant temperatures on life history and life table parameters of Trichogramma euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2022, 115, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Akshe, V.B.; Gud, M.A.; Shinde, S.K.; Kadam, J.R. Population dynamics of safflower aphid, Uroleucon compositae (Theobald) as influenced by weather parameters. J. Agrometeorol. 2010, 12, 102–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McCalla, K.A.; Kececi, M.; Milosavljevic, I.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Hoddle, M.S. The influence of temperature variation on life history parameters and thermal performance curves of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasitoid of the Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 1560–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Milosavljevic, I.; McCalla, K.A.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Hoddle, M.S. Effects of constant and fluctuating temperatures on development rates and longevity of Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Milosavljevic, I.; McCalla, K.A.; Morgan, D.J.W.; Hoddle, M.S. The Effects of Constant and Fluctuating Temperatures on Development of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae), the Asian citrus psyllid. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Seo, B.Y.; Kim, E.Y.; Ahn, J.J.; Kim, Y.; Kang, S.; Jung, J.K. Development, reproduction, and life table parameters of the foxglove aphid, Aulacorthum solani Kaltenbach (Hemiptera: Aphididae), on soybean at constant temperatures. Insects 2020, 11, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. De Conti, B.F.; Bueno, V.H.P.; Sampaio, M.V. The parasitoid Praon volucre (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) as a potential biological control agent of the aphid Uroleucon ambrosiae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on lettuce in Brazil. Eur. J. Entomol. 2008, 105, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shrestha, G.; Skovgard, H.; Enkegaard, A. Parasitization of commercially available parasitoid species against the lettuce aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 1535–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gong, P.; Li, X.; Gao, H.; Wang, C.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, E.; Zhu, X. Field evolved resistance to pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, organophosphates and macrolides in Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus) and Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) from China. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 128747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gong, P.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Zhu, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, G.; Liu, E.; Gao, H.; et al. The sensitivity of field populations of Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) to seven insecticides in northern China. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Low, V.L.; Chen, C.D.; Lim, P.E.; Lee, H.L.; Lim, Y.A.; Tan, T.K.; Sofian-Azirun, M. First molecular genotyping of insensitive acetylcholinesterase associated with malathion resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus Say populations in Malaysia. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Su, S.; Jian, C.; Zhang, X.; Fang, S.; Peng, X.; Pinero, J.C.; Chen, M. Sublethal effects of abamectin on the development, reproduction, detoxification enzyme activity, and related gene expression of the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 2430–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pu, X.; Yang, Y.; Wu, S.; Wu, Y. Characterisation of abamectin resistance in a field-evolved multiresistant population of Plutella xylostella. Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Quan, L.F.; Qiu, G.S.; Zhang, H.J.; Sun, L.N.; Li, Y.Y.; Yan, W.T. Sublethal concentration of beta-cypermethrin influences fecundity and mating behavior of Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae) adults. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 2196–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The age-stage-specific survival rate and age-specific fecundity of Uroleucon formosanum under different temperatures. (A) the age-stage-specific survival rate of U. formosanum under different temperatures. (B) the age-specific fecundity of U. formosanum under different temperatures. N1, first instar nymph; N2, second instar nymph; N3, third instar nymph; N4, fourth instar nymph; A, adult; lx, age-specific survival; mx, age-specific fecundity; lxmx, age-specific maternity.
Figure 1. The age-stage-specific survival rate and age-specific fecundity of Uroleucon formosanum under different temperatures. (A) the age-stage-specific survival rate of U. formosanum under different temperatures. (B) the age-specific fecundity of U. formosanum under different temperatures. N1, first instar nymph; N2, second instar nymph; N3, third instar nymph; N4, fourth instar nymph; A, adult; lx, age-specific survival; mx, age-specific fecundity; lxmx, age-specific maternity.
Insects 13 00693 g001
Figure 2. Age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) of Uroleucon formosanum. N1, first instar nymph; N2, second instar nymph; N3, third instar nymph; N4, fourth instar nymph; A, adult.
Figure 2. Age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) of Uroleucon formosanum. N1, first instar nymph; N2, second instar nymph; N3, third instar nymph; N4, fourth instar nymph; A, adult.
Insects 13 00693 g002
Table 1. Developmental duration and fecundity of Uroleucon formosanum under different temperatures.
Table 1. Developmental duration and fecundity of Uroleucon formosanum under different temperatures.
StageUroleucon formosanum
17 °C21 °C25 °C
First instar2.65 ± 0.18 a1.35 ± 0.08 b1.78 ± 0.12 b
Second instar2.16 ± 0.12 a2.25 ± 0.09 a1.64 ± 0.08 b
Third instar2.67 ± 0.13 a2.00 ± 0.09 b1.49 ± 0.13 c
Fourth instar2.88 ± 0.22 a2.74 ± 0.10 a1.85 ± 0.09 b
Preadult duration9.33 ± 0.50 a8.15 ± 0.20 b6.25 ± 0.26 c
Adult longevity12.87 ± 1.49 ab11.68 ± 1.00 b13.24 ± 1.09 a
Total longevity19.05 ± 1.69 a19.08 ± 1.11 a17.18 ± 1.33 b
APRP2.07 ± 0.17 a1.83 ± 0.09 a1.38 ± 0.09 b
TPRP13.83 ± 0.18 a11.28 ± 0.15 b9.19 ± 0.18 c
Fecundity (offspring per female)31.68 ± 3.07 a32.58 ± 1.84 a25.31 ± 1.83 b
For Uroleucon formosanum, means and standard error (SE) were estimated by the bootstrap technique with 10,000 resampling using TWOSEX-MSChart. Means in the same row followed by a different letter indicates significant differences at p < 0.05. APRP, adult prereproductive period; TPRP, total prereproductive period.
Table 2. Life table parameters of Uroleucon formosanum under different temperatures.
Table 2. Life table parameters of Uroleucon formosanum under different temperatures.
Temperature (°C)TR0rλ
1720.21 ± 0.49 c31.68 ± 3.07 b0.17 ± 0.01 a1.19 ± 0.01 a
2117.35 ± 0.06 b32.58 ± 1.84 b0.20 ± 0.01 b1.22 ± 0.00 b
2513.81 ± 0.47 a25.31 ± 1.83 a0.23 ± 0.01 c1.26 ± 0.00 c
The means, standard errors (SE) and significant differences were analyzed using bootstrapping methods in TWOSEX-MSChart. 100,000 replications were used in the bootstrapping procedures. Means in the same row followed by a different letter indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. T, the mean generation time; R0, net reproductive rate; r, intrinsic rate of increase; λ, finite rate of increase.
Table 3. Susceptibility of Uroleucon formosanum to six insecticides.
Table 3. Susceptibility of Uroleucon formosanum to six insecticides.
InsecticideSlope ± SELC50 (mg/L)95% CIn
Chlorpyrifos0.55 ± 0.113.082.35–3.60300
Abamectin0.09 ± 0.0214.3310.74–17.63300
Beta-cypermethrin0.03 ± 0.0117.679.17–28.97300
Imidacloprid0.02 ± 0.0130.6712.58–46.71300
Nitenpyram0.02 ± 0.0136.5728.20–43.44300
Thiamethoxam0.02 ± 0.0046.8931.11–65.07300
SE, standard error; LC50, lethal concentration of 50%; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; n, number of aphids used in bioassay.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jing, T.-X.; Qi, C.-C.; Jiao, A.; Liu, X.-Q.; Zhang, S.; Su, H.-H.; Yang, Y.-Z. Life Table Construction under Different Temperatures and Insecticide Susceptibility Analysis of Uroleucon formosanum (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects 2022, 13, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13080693

AMA Style

Jing T-X, Qi C-C, Jiao A, Liu X-Q, Zhang S, Su H-H, Yang Y-Z. Life Table Construction under Different Temperatures and Insecticide Susceptibility Analysis of Uroleucon formosanum (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects. 2022; 13(8):693. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13080693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jing, Tian-Xing, Chu-Chu Qi, Ao Jiao, Xiao-Qiang Liu, Shuai Zhang, Hong-Hua Su, and Yi-Zhong Yang. 2022. "Life Table Construction under Different Temperatures and Insecticide Susceptibility Analysis of Uroleucon formosanum (Hemiptera: Aphididae)" Insects 13, no. 8: 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13080693

APA Style

Jing, T. -X., Qi, C. -C., Jiao, A., Liu, X. -Q., Zhang, S., Su, H. -H., & Yang, Y. -Z. (2022). Life Table Construction under Different Temperatures and Insecticide Susceptibility Analysis of Uroleucon formosanum (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insects, 13(8), 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13080693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop