Diversity of Segetal Flora in Salix viminalis L. Crops Established on Former Arable and Fallow Lands in Central Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Characteristics of the Plantations
2.2. Soil Conditions
2.3. Weather Conditions
2.4. Methods
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the Segetal Flora Depending on the Land Use before Establishing Plantations
3.2. Changes in the Segetal Flora on Salix viminalis L. Plantations Established on Fallow, Depending on the Age of the Plantation
3.3. Similarities and Differences between the Species Compositions of Six Groups of Salix viminalis L. Plantations Proved by Statistical Methods
3.4. Invasive Species Accompanying Salix viminalis L. Plantations
3.5. Medicinal, Poisonous and Melliferous Species of Flora Accompanying the Salix viminalis L. Plantations
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed on 20 December 2019).
- Renewables Global Status Report. Available online: https://www.energia.org/renewables-2018-global-status-report-ren21/ (accessed on 20 December 2019).
- Faber, A. Natural effects of cultivation of energy crops. Studia i Raporty IUNG-PIB 2008, 11, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
- Scioe-Murg, O.M.; Ciolac, R.; Tonea, E.; Maria, C.C.; Martin, S. The impact of willow growings in energy forestry systems upon the environment. Lucrări Științifice Manag. Agric. 2015, 17, 268–272. [Google Scholar]
- Kyoto Protocol. Available online: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20052031684/O/D20051684.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2020).
- Polish Energy Policy Until 2030. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WMP20100020011/O/M20100011.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2020). (In Polish)
- Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/77/oj (accessed on 1 October 2020).
- Regulation (EC) No 1099/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/1099/oj (accessed on 2 October 2020).
- GUS. Energy from Renewable Energy Sources in 2018. 2019. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko-energia/energia/energia-ze-zrodel-odnawialnych-w-2018-roku,10,2.html (accessed on 28 September 2020).
- Stolarski, M.J. Plantations of Fast-Growing Trees and Shrubs as an Alternative to Wood from the Forest—Private Resource Bases. 2015. Available online: http://www.npl.ibles.pl/sites/default/files/referat/mariusz_stolarski_uwm_plantacje_drzew_i_krzewow_szybko_rosnacych_jako.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2019). (In Polish).
- Stolarski, M.J.; Niksa, D.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Tworkowski, J.; Szczukowski, S. Willow productivity from small- and large scale experimental plantations in Poland form 2000 to 2017. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybek, A. Bioenergy in Poland. Energy Crops in Poland—The Current State. 2015. Available online: http://www.pimot.eu/attachments/article/753/Anna%20Grzybek%20-%20ITP%20POLBIOM.%20Bioenergia%20w%20Polsce.%20Uprawy%20energetyczne%20w%20Polsce%20-%20stan%20obecny.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2019). (In Polish).
- Jadczyszyn, J.; Faber, A.; Zaliwski, A. Designation of Areas Potentially Suitable for the Cultivation of Willow and Virginia Mallow for Energy Purposes in Poland. Studia Rap. 2008, 11, 55–66. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Błażej, J. Status and prospects of willow energy plantations in the Podkarpackie Voivodeship. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 56–63, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Fry, D.A.; Slater, F.M. Early rotation short rotation willow coppice as a winter food resource for birds. Biomass Bioener. 2011, 35, 2545–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauvat, M.; Perez, G.; Hedde, M.; Lamy, I. Establishment of bioenergy crops on metal contaminated soils stimulates belowground fauna. Biomass Bioener. 2014, 62, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunbjerg, A.K.; Høye, T.T.; Eskildsen, A.; Nygaard, B.; Damgaard, C.F.; Ejrnæs, R. The collapse of marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) populations associated with declining host plant abundance. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 211, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ledin, S. Environmental consequences when growing short rotation forests in Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 15, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grelle, A.; Aronsson, P.; Weilien, P.; Klemedtsson, L.; Lindroth, A. Large carbon-sink potential by Kyoto forests in Sweden-a case study on willow plantations. Tellus 2007, 59, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holzner, W. Weed species and weed communities. Vegetatio 1978, 38, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fanarillo, E.; Petit, S.; Dessaint, F.; Rosati, L.; Abbate, G. Species composition, richness, and diversity of weed communities of winter arable land in relation to geo-environmental factors: A gradient analysis in mainland Italy. Botany 2020, 98, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutkowska, A.; Janicka, M.; Paderewski, J. The characteristics of Salix viminalis L. crop flora established on soils with different phosphorous contents. Soil Sci. Ann. 2020, 71, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lossová, Z.; Chytrý, M.; Cimalová, S.; Kropáč, Z.; Otýpková, Z.; Pyšek, P.; Tichý, L. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: Gradient of diversity and species composition. J. Veg. Sci. 2004, 15, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fried, G.; Norton, R.L.; Reboud, X. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrzański, A.; Adamczewski, K. The influence of weed control on agrophytocenosis biodiversity. Prog. Plant Prot. 2009, 49, 982–995, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Wanic, M.; Parzonka, M.; Załuski, D. Biodiversity of weed communities in common wheat and spelt following various forecrops. Acta Agrobot. 2018, 71, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feledyn-Szewczyk, B.; Matyka, M.; Staniak, M. Comparision ot the effect of perennial energy crops and agricultural crops on weed flora diversity. Agronomy 2019, 9, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kędziora, A.; Karg, J. Risks to biological diversity. Nauka 2010, 4, 107–114, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Trąba, Cz.; Majda, J.; Wolański, P. Plant communities accompanying plantations of Salix viminalis L. in podkarpackie voievodeship. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 323–336, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Baum, S.; Weih, M.; Bolte, A. Stand age characteristics and soil properties affect species composition of vascular plants in short rotation coppice plantations. BioRisk 2012, 7, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Janicka, M.; Kutkowska, A.; Paderewski, J. Diversity of vascular flora accompanying Salix viminalis L. crops depending on soil conditions. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archaux, F.; Chevalier, R.; Berthelot, A. Towards practices favourable to plant diversity in hybrid poplar plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojciechowski, W.; Sowiński, J.; Zawieja, J. The effect of age of willow plantation on weed infestation in the Sudety Mountains. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 351–358, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Fehér, A.; Halmová, D.; Končeková, L. Gradient analysis of importance of spontaneously occurring vascular plant species in energy tree and grass stands. Acta Reg. Environ. 2013, 2, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pučka, I.; Lazdiņa, D.; Bebre, I. Ground flora in plantations of three years old short rotation willow coppice. Agron. Res. 2016, 14, 1450–1466. [Google Scholar]
- Hochół, T. Weeds or plants accompanying crops? Pamiet. Pulawski 2003, 134, 89–96, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Grimau, L.; Gómez, M.; Figueroa, R.; Pizarro, R.; Gabriel Núñez, G.; Montenegro, G. The importance of weeds as melliferous flora in central Chile. Environ. Ecol. 2014, 41, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kabała, C.; Bednarek, R.; Białousz, S.; Bielska, A.; Charzyński, P.; Chodorowski, J.; Chojnicki, J.; Czępińska-Kamińska, D.; Drewnik, M.; Glina, B.; et al. Systematic of Polish Soil, 6th ed.; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu, Instytut Nauk o Glebie i Ochrony Środowiska Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu, Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze. Komisja Genezy, Klasyfikacji i Kartografii Gleb: Wrocław-Warszawa, Poland, 2019; pp. 1–292. [Google Scholar]
- IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014; Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Re-sources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Polish Society of Soil Science. Particle Size Distribution and Textural Classes of Soils and Mineral Materials-Classification of Polish Society of Soil Science 2008. Soil Sci. Ann. 2009, 60, 5–16, (In Polish with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Łódź Voivodeship Geoportal. Available online: http://www.geoportal.lodzkie.pl (accessed on 24 January 2020).
- Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde; Springer: Vienna, Austria; New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Pawłowski, B.; Pawłowski, B. Composition and structure of plant communities and methods of their research. In Polish Vegetation, 2nd ed.; Szafer, W., Zarzycki, K., Eds.; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1972; pp. 237–269. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Dzwonko, Z. Guidebook to Phytosociological Studies, 2nd ed.; Sorus, S.C., Ed.; Instytut Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Poznań- Kraków, Poland, 2008; pp. 1–304. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Matuszkiewicz, W. Guide to the Determination of Polish Plant Communities; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Polska, 2012; pp. 1–537. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Anioł-Kwiatkowska, J. Flora and synanthropic communities of Legnica, Lubin, Polkowice. Acta Univ. Wratislav. Prace Bot. 1974, 229, 1–151. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Korniak, T. Segetal flora of north-eastern Poland, its spatial differentation and current changes. Acta Acad. Agric. Tech. Olst. Agric. 1992, 53 (Suppl. A), 1–77, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Mirek, Z.; Piękoś-Mirkowa, H.; Zając, A.; Zając, M. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland—A checklist. In Biodiversity of Poland; Mirek, Z., Szafer, W., Eds.; Institute of Botany, Polish Adacemy of Sciences: Kraków, Poland, 2002; Volume 1, pp. 1–442. [Google Scholar]
- Rutkowski, L. Key for the Determination of Lowland Poland Vascular Plants, 2nd ed.; PWN: Warszawa, Polska, 2008; pp. 1–814. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Sowa, R.; Warcholińska, U. Synanthropic flora of Sulejów and Podklasztorze. Acta Univ. Lodz. Folia Bot. 1981, 1, 77–131, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Szafer, W.; Kulczyński, S.; Pawłowski, B. Polish Vegetation, 3rd ed.; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1969; pp. 1–1020. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Zając, E.U.; Zając, A. The list of archeophytes occurring in Poland. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Jagiellońskiego Prace Bot. 1975, 395, 7–16, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Zając, M.; Zajac, A. A tentative list of segetal and ruderal apophytes in Poland. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Jagiellońskiego Prace Bot. 1992, 24, 7–23. [Google Scholar]
- Zając, A. The origin of the archaeophytes occurring in Poland. Rozpr. Habilitacyjne Uniw. Jagiellońskiego 1979, 29, 1–218. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Tokarska-Guzik, B.; Dajdok, Z.; Zajac, M.; Zajac, A.; Urbisz, A.; Danielewicz, W.; Hołdyński, C. Plants of Alien Origin in Poland with Particular Emphasis on Invasive Species; Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska: Warszawa, Poland, 2012; pp. 1–197. [Google Scholar]
- Sulborska, A. Melliferous Plants; Bee & Honey Sp. z o.o.: Klecza Dolna, Poland, 2019; pp. 1–754. [Google Scholar]
- Ter Braak, C.J.F. Cannonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 1986, 67, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Angolini, C.; Nucci, A.; Frignani, F.; Landi, M. Using multivariate analyses to assess effects of fluvial type one plant, species distribution in Mediterranean river. Wetlands 2011, 31, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legendre, P.; Oksanen, J.; ter Braak, C.J. Testing the significance of canonical axes in redundancy analysis. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011, 2, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walther, B.A.; Morand, S. Comparative performance of species richness estimation methods. Parasitology 1998, 116, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, F.T.; Meier, R.; Larsen, M.N. Testing species richness estimation methods using museum label data on the Danish Asilidae. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12, 687–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Podlech, D. Pocket Encyclopedia, 3rd ed.; Wydawnictwo MUZA SA: Warszawa, Poland, 1997; pp. 1–253. [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham, M.D.; Bishop, J.D.; McKay, H.V.; Sage, R.B. ABRE Monitoring-Ecology of Short Rotation Coppice; URN04/961; Department of Trade and Industry: London, UK, 2004; pp. 1–157. [Google Scholar]
- Welc, M.; Lundkvist, A.; Nordh, N.-E.; Verwijst, T. Weed community trajectories in cereal and willow cultivations after termination of a willow short rotation coppice. Agron. Res. 2017, 15, 1795–1814. [Google Scholar]
- Krechowski, J.; Piórek, K.; Ciosek, M.T. Vegetation accompanying energetic willow (Salix viminalis L.) plantations in Radzyń Podlaski. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 195–205, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Piórek, K.; Krechowski, M.T.; Ciosek, M.T.; Sikorski, R. Effect of the selected factors on floristic composition of communities developing in energetic willow. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 219–232, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Trzcińska-Tacik, H. Importance of field weeds species diversity. Pamiet. Pulawski 2003, 134, 253–262, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Luzuriaga, A.L.; Escudero, A.; Olano, J.M.; Loidi, J. Regenerative role of seed bank following an intense soil disturbance. Acta Oecologica 2005, 27, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawieja, J. Increashe of potential weed infestation threat on fields temporarily eliminated from cultivation. Fragm. Agron. 2006, 23, 126–138. [Google Scholar]
- Sekutowski, T.R.; Włodek, S.; Biskupski, A.; Sienkiewicz-Cholewa, U. Comparision of the content of seeds and plants of the goldenrod (Solidago Sp.) in the fallow and adjacent field. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Przyr. we Wrocławiu-Rol. 2012, 584, 99–112. [Google Scholar]
- Kurus, J. Weed infestation of the fields neighbouring with multiyear fallow lands on two types of soil. Fragm. Agron. 2010, 27, 84–93. [Google Scholar]
- Baum, S.; Weih, M.; Bolte, A. Floristic diversity in Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) plantations: Comparison between soil seed bank and recent vegetation. Appl. Agric. For. Res. 2013, 63, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korniak, T.; Hołdyński, Cz.; Wąsowicz, K. Changes in the weed flora of willow plantations in north-eastern Poland. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 159–170, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Skrajna, T.; Skrzyczyńska, J.; Rzymowska, Z.; Affek-Starczewska, A. Composition and structure of communities infestin of Salix sp. in northern part of Południowopodlaska Lowland. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
- Ziaja, M.; Wnuk, Z. Weed infestation of energetic crop in Leszczawa Dolna (podkarpackie voivodeship). Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 367–375, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Janicka, M.; Kutkowska, A.; Paderewski, J. Diversity of vascular flora in Salix viminalis L. crops depending on the harvest cycle. Annu. Set Environ. Prot. 2019, 21, 1175–1201. [Google Scholar]
- Anioł-Kwiatkowska, J.; Kącki, Z.; Śliwiński, M. A comparision of species composition of three energy willow crops. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 19–33, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Birmele, J.; Kopp, G.; Brodbeck, F.; Konold, W.; Sauter, U.H. Successional changes of phytodiversity on a short rotation coppice plantation in Oberschwaben, Germany. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowe, R.L.; Hanley, M.E.; Goulson, D.; Clarke. D.J.; Doncaster, C.P.; Taylor, G. Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment. Biomass Bioener. 2011, 25, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jezierska-Domaradzka, A.; Domaradzki, K. Accompanying vegetation of Salix viminalis L. on meadow habitat in Muchów (Kaczawskie Highland). Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 129–135, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Kwiatkowski, C.A.; Haliniarz, M.; Harasim, E. Weed infestation and health of organically grown Chamomile (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rausch.) depending on selected foliar sprays and row spacing. Agriculture 2020, 10, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djudjević, L.; Mitrović, M.; Gajić, G.; Jarić, S.; Kostić, O.; Oberan, L.; Pavlović, P. An allelopathic investigation of the domination of the introduced invasive Conyza canadensis L. Flora 2011, 206, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wróbel, M.; Wróbel, J.; Gregorczyk, A. The effect of chemical soil properties on weed infestation structure in willow (Salix L.) Short-Rotation Coppice. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 1893–1899. [Google Scholar]
- Duer, I.; Feledyn-Szewczyk, B. Botanical monitoring in perennial bioenergy crops. Pamiet. Pulawski 2009, 150, 105–119, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Bacieczko, W.; Borcz, A. Segetal flora of the plantations of Virginia fanpetals Sida hermaphrodita (L.) Rusby in Łobez commune (West Pomerania). Folia Pomeranae Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric. Aliment. Piscaria Zootech. 2016, 38, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feledyn-Szewczyk, B. The influence of agricultural land use on weed flora diversity. Monogr. Rozpr. Nauk. 2013, 36, 1–184, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
- Rola, J.; Rola, H. Solidago spp. as bioindicator of fallow occurence on arable area. Fragm. Agron. 2010, 27, 122–131, (Summary In English). [Google Scholar]
Year of the Study | Age of Plantations | Type of Plantations/Locality | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plantations established on former arable lands (AR) | ||||||
Dmosin | Podole 1 | Podole 2 | Piwaki 1 | Piwaki 2 | ||
2011–2012 | 6–7 years old | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2013–2014 | 9–10 years old | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Plantations established on former fallow land (FA) | ||||||
Okołowice | Świątniki 1 | Świątniki 2 | ||||
2011–2012 | 3–4 years old | 5 | 2 | 3 | ||
2013 | 5 years old | 5 | 3 | 2 | ||
2014–2015 | 6–7 years old | 6 | 3 | 1 | ||
2018 | 9–10 years old | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Year Month | Average Monthly Air Temperature (°C) | ||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2018 | 1971–2000 | |
IV | 10.5 | 9.2 | 7.3 | 10.2 | 8.1 | 13.2 | 7.7 |
V | 13.7 | 14.8 | 14.2 | 13.3 | 12.9 | 16.5 | 13.4 |
VI | 17.9 | 16.5 | 17.6 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 18.3 | 16.1 |
VII | 17.7 | 19.9 | 19.4 | 20.6 | 19.5 | 20.2 | 17.7 |
VIII | 18.6 | 18.7 | 18.7 | 17.6 | 22.1 | 20.5 | 17.6 |
IX | 15.0 | 14.3 | 11.7 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 13.0 |
X | 8.9 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 9.9 | 7.3 | 9.9 | 8.2 |
IV-X | 14.6 | 14.5 | 14.1 | 14.5 | 14.4 | 16.2 | 13.3 |
Sums of Monthly Precipitation (mm) | |||||||
Month | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2018 | 1971–2000 |
IV | 22.3 | 54.2 | 48.8 | 43.3 | 32.8 | 34.7 | 36.0 |
V | 46.1 | 21.4 | 112.0 | 106.3 | 37.2 | 44.2 | 51.0 |
VI | 58.8 | 70.9 | 131.4 | 61.2 | 29.7 | 24.7 | 68.0 |
VII | 165.2 | 117.6 | 68.4 | 50.4 | 70.9 | 146.6 | 88.0 |
VIII | 92.4 | 41.1 | 78.2 | 84.9 | 17.9 | 83.9 | 61.0 |
IX | 6.5 | 58.1 | 89.8 | 31.9 | 61.1 | 29.4 | 51.0 |
X | 23.1 | 36.7 | 25.1 | 24.4 | 52.6 | 58.2 | 40.0 |
IV-X | 414.4 | 400.0 | 553.7 | 402.4 | 302.2 | 421.7 | 395.0 |
Symbol | Cover (%) |
---|---|
5 | 75–100 |
4 | 50–75 |
3 | 25–50 |
2 | 5–25 |
1 | Less than 5 % of the test area |
+ | Rarely, with slight coverage |
r | Very rarely, one or more specimens |
Species | Arable Land | Fallow | Botanical Family | Phytosociological Class | Life-Form | Geographical and Historical Group | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plantation Age in Years | ||||||||
6–7 | 9–10 | 6–7 | 9–10 | |||||
Elymus repens (L.) Gould | V | IV | I | II | Poaceae | Agr int-rep | G | Anw |
Artemisia vulgaris L. | IV | II | IV | II | Asteraceae | Artemi | C | Al |
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop | IV | II | I | I | Asteraceae | Artemi | G | Al |
Achillea millefolium L.s. str. | III | III | IV | IV | Asteraceae | Moll-Arr | H | Ał |
Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist | III | I | II | II | Asteraceae | Stel med | T | An |
Poa annua L. | III | I | Poaceae | Artemi | T | Ał | ||
Vicia hirsuta (L.) Gray | II | III | III | Fabaceae | Stel med | T | An | |
Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) H.L. Mühl. | II | I | Poaceae | Stel med | T | An | ||
Equisetum arvense L. | II | I | Equisetaceae | Agr int-rep | G | Ał | ||
Convolvulus arvensis L. | II | I | I | I | Convolvulaceae | Agr int-rep | H | Amk |
Matricaria maritima subsp.inodora (L.) Dostál | II | Asteraceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Galeopsis tetrahit L. | I | II | Lamiaceae | Stel med | T | Al | ||
Rumex acetosella L. | I | I | III | II | Polygonaceae | Stel med | G | Ap |
Chenopodium album L. | I | I | Chenopodiaceae | Stel med | T | Anw | ||
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. | I | I | Lamiaceae | t | T | Al | ||
Galium aparine L. | I | I | Rubiaceae | Artemi | T | Al | ||
Medicago lupulina L. | I | Fabaceae | t | T | Amk | |||
Melandrium album (Mill.) Garcke | I | I | Caryophyllaceae | Artemi | T | Ał | ||
Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill | I | I | Boraginaceae | Stel med | T | An | ||
Plantago major L. | I | Plataginaceae | Moll-Arr | H | Al | |||
Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. and Schult. | I | I | Poaceae | Stel med | T | An | ||
Sonchus oleraceus L. | I | Asteraceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Stachys palustris L. | I | Lamiaceae | Moll-Arr | G | Ał | |||
Stellaria media (L.) Vill. | I | I | Caryophyllaceae | Stel med | T | Ał | ||
Trifolium arvense L. | I | I | II | I | Fabaceae | Koele-Coryne | T | Ap |
Vicia angustifolia L. | I | I | Fabaceae | Stel med | T | An | ||
Vicia cracca L. | I | I | I | Fabaceae | Moll-Arr | H | Ał | |
Anthoxanthum aristatum Boiss. | I | Poaceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Cardaminopsis arenosa (L.) Hayek | II | I | Brassicaceae | t | H | Ap | ||
Cerastium holosteoides Fr. emend. Hyl. | I | Caryophyllaceae | Moll-Arr | T | Ał | |||
Polygonum hydropiper L. | I | II | Polygonaceae | Bident | T | Anw | ||
Sonchus arvensis L. | I | I | Asteraceae | Stel med | H | Anw | ||
Sonchus asper (L.) Hill | I | Asteraceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Thlaspi arvense L. | I | Brassicaceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Veronica arvensis L. | I | I | Scrophulariaceae | t | T | An | ||
Vicia tetrasperma (L.) Schreb. | I | Fabaceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Vicia villosa Roth | I | Fabaceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Viola arvensis Murray | II | Violaceae | Stel med | T | An | |||
Number of species | 27 | 22 | 19 | 13 | - | - |
Species | Fallow | Arable Land | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plantation Age in Years | ||||||||||||
3–4 | 5 | 6–7 | 9–10 | 6–7 | 9–10 | |||||||
S | D | S | D | S | D | S | D | S | D | S | D | |
Rumex acetosella L. | IV | 204 | III | 153 | III | 202 | II | 102 | I | 50 | I | 50 |
Artemisia vulgaris L. | III | 152 | III | 54 | IV | 253 | II | 4 | IV | 203 | II | 151 |
Elymus repens (L.) Gould | IV | 650 | IV | 725 | I | 425 | II | 325 | V | 2451 | IV | 1750 |
Achillea millefolium L. s. str. | IV | 551 | V | 780 | IV | 650 | IV | 725 | III | 201 | III | 277 |
Vicia hirsuta L. (Gray) | II | 3 | IV | 204 | III | 250 | 0 | 0 | II | 276 | III | 54 |
Viola arvensis Murray | II | 4 | III | 5 | II | 151 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Convolvulus arvensis L. | II | 53 | IV | 55 | I | 51 | I | 1 | II | 101 | I | 50 |
Trifolium arvense L. | II | 101 | III | 327 | II | 151 | I | 2 | I | 175 | I | 50 |
Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist | I | 2 | I | 3 | II | 52 | II | 150 | III | 152 | I | 100 |
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop | I | 50 | 0 | 0 | I | 1 | I | 50 | IV | 203 | II | 150 |
Poa annua L. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | III | 152 | I | 175 |
Class | Fallow | Arable Land | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plantation Age in Years | ||||||||||||
6–7 | 9–10 | Total (6–10) | 6–7 | 9–10 | Total (6–10) | |||||||
D | % D | D | % D | D | % D | D | % D | D | % D | D | % D | |
Stellarietea mediae | 857 | 32.4 | 255 | 18.7 | 1112 | 27.8 | 692 | 16.0 | 457 | 13.3 | 1149 | 14.8 |
Artemisietea vulgaris | 254 | 9.6 | 54 | 4 | 308 | 7.7 | 712 | 16.5 | 626 | 18.2 | 1338 | 17.2 |
Molinio-Arrhenatheretea | 751 | 28.4 | 727 | 53.3 | 1478 | 36.9 | 254 | 5.8 | 278 | 8 | 532 | 6.8 |
Agropyretea intermedio-repentis | 476 | 18 | 326 | 23.9 | 802 | 20 | 2503 | 57.7 | 1801 | 52.4 | 4304 | 55.4 |
Koelerio glaucae-Corynephoretea canescentis | 151 | 5.8 | 2 | 0.1 | 153 | 3.8 | 175 | 4 | 50 | 1.5 | 225 | 2.9 |
Bidentetea tripartiti | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 1.5 | 50 | 0.6 |
Sporadic species | 153 | 5.8 | 1 | 0 | 154 | 3.8 | 2 | 0 | 176 | 5.1 | 178 | 2.3 |
Total | 2642 | 100 | 1365 | 100 | 4007 | 100 | 4338 | 100 | 3438 | 100 | 7776 | 100 |
Name of Species | Plantation Age in Years | Family | Phytosociological Classes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3–4 | 5 | 6–7 | 9–10 | |||
Achillea millefolium L. s.str. | + | + | + | + | Asteraceae | Molinio-Arrhenatheretea |
Anchusa arvensis (L.) M. Bieb. | + | Boraginaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Anthoxanthum aristatum Boiss. | + | Poaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Apera spica-venti (L.) P. Beauv. | + | Poaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Arenaria serpyllifolia L. | + | Caryophyllaceae | Sporadic species | |||
Artemisia vulgaris L. | + | + | + | + | Asteraceae | Artemisieta vulgaris |
Cardaminopsis arenosa (L.) Hayek | + | + | Brassicaceae | Sporadic species | ||
Chenopodium album L. | + | + | Chenopodiaceae | Stellarietea mediae | ||
Chenopodium polyspermum L. | + | Chenopodiaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scope | + | + | + | Asteraceae | Artemisieta vulgaris | |
Convolvulus arvensis L. | + | + | + | + | Convolvulaceae | Agropyretea intermedio-repentis |
Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist | + | + | + | + | Asteraceae | Stellarietea mediae |
Elymus repens (L.) Gould | + | + | + | + | Poaceae | Agropyretea intermedio-repentis |
Equisetum arvense L. | + | + | Equisetaceae | Agropyretea intermedio-repentis | ||
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. | + | Lamiaceae | Sporadic species | |||
Galeopsis tetrahit L. | + | Lamiaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Galium aparine L. | + | + | Rubiaceae | Artemisieta vulgaris | ||
Matricaria maritima subsp. inodora (L.) Dostál | + | Asteraceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Melandrium album (Mill.) Gracke | + | Caryophyllaceae | Artemisieta vulgaris | |||
Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill | + | + | Boraginaceae | Stellarietea mediae | ||
Rumex acetosella L. | + | + | + | + | Polygonaceae | Stellarietea mediae |
Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem & Schult. | + | + | Poaceae | Stellarietea mediae | ||
Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. | + | + | Poaceae | Stellarietea mediae | ||
Sonchus arvensis L. | + | Asteraceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Stachys palustris L. | + | Lamiaceae | Molinio-Arrhenatheretea | |||
Thlaspi arvense L. | + | Brassicaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Trifolium arvense L. | + | + | + | + | Fabaceae | Koelerio glauce-Corynephoretea |
Veronica arvensis L. | + | Scrophulariaceae | Sporadic species | |||
Vicia angustifolia L. | + | + | + | Fabaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |
Vicia cracca L. | + | + | + | + | Fabaceae | Molinio-Arrhenatheretea |
Vicia hirsuta (L.) Gray | + | + | + | Fabaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |
Vicia tetrasperma (L.) Schreb. | + | Fabaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |||
Vicia villosa Roth | + | + | + | Fabaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |
Viola arvensis Murray | + | + | + | Violaceae | Stellarietea mediae | |
Number of species | 21 | 22 | 19 | 13 |
Category | Plantation Age in Years | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3–4 | 5 | 6–7 | 9–10 | |||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
Geographical and Historical Groups | ||||||||
Antropophytes | 9 | 43 | 9 | 41 | 8 | 42.1 | 3 | 23 |
Apophytes | 12 | 57 | 13 | 59 | 11 | 57.9 | 10 | 77 |
Apophyte origin | ||||||||
Meadow species | 4 | 33.3 | 4 | 30.8 | 2 | 18.2 | 2 | 20 |
Woodland and shrub species | 3 | 25.0 | 3 | 23.0 | 3 | 27.3 | 2 | 20 |
Sandyside | 2 | 16.7 | 2 | 15.4 | 3 | 27.3 | 3 | 30 |
Xerothermic grasslands | 1 | 8.3 | 2 | 15.4 | 1 | 9.0 | 1 | 10 |
Waterside and wetside | 2 | 16.7 | 2 | 15.4 | 2 | 18.2 | 2 | 20 |
Biological stability | ||||||||
Perennial species | 9 | 43 | 7 | 32 | 8 | 42.1 | 7 | 53.8 |
Short-lived species | 12 | 57 | 15 | 68 | 11 | 57.9 | 6 | 46.2 |
Life-form | ||||||||
Hemicryptophyte | 3 | 14.3 | 3 | 13.6 | 5 | 26.3 | 4 | 30.7 |
Therophyte | 12 | 57.1 | 15 | 68.2 | 10 | 52.7 | 5 | 38.5 |
Geophyte | 5 | 23.8 | 3 | 13.6 | 3 | 15.7 | 3 | 23.1 |
Herbaceous chamaephyte | 1 | 4.8 | 1 | 4.6 | 1 | 5.3 | 1 | 7.7 |
Class | Plantation Age in Years | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3–4 | 5 | 6–7 | 9–10 | |||||||||
% | D% | D | % | D% | D | % | D% | D | % | D% | D | |
Stellarietea mediae | 52.4 | 14.2 | 274 | 54.6 | 19.6 | 475 | 47.5 | 32.4 | 857 | 38.4 | 18.7 | 255 |
Artemisietea vulgaris | 14.3 | 13.2 | 256 | 13.6 | 2.3 | 56 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 254 | 15.4 | 4 | 54 |
Molinio-Arrhenatheretea | 14.3 | 33.7 | 653 | 9 | 32.3 | 782 | 10.5 | 28.4 | 751 | 15.4 | 53.3 | 727 |
Agropyretea intermedio-repentis | 14.3 | 33.7 | 651 | 13.6 | 32.3 | 781 | 10.5 | 18 | 476 | 15.4 | 23.9 | 326 |
Koelerio glaucae-Corynephoretea canescentis | 4.7 | 5.2 | 101 | 4.6 | 13.5 | 327 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 151 | 7.7 | 0.1 | 2 |
Sporadic species | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.6 | 0 | 1 | 15.8 | 5.8 | 153 | 7.7 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 1935 | 100 | 100 | 2422 | 100 | 100 | 2642 | 100 | 100 | 1365 |
Species | Fallow | Arable Land | Properties | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plantation Age in Years | |||||||||||||
3–4 | 5 | 6–7 | 9–10 | 6–7 | 9–10 | ||||||||
S | D | S | D | S | D | S | D | S | D | S | D | ||
Achillea millefolium L. s.str. | IV | 551 | V | 780 | IV | 650 | IV | 725 | III | 201 | III | 277 | L |
Anchusa arvensis (L.) M. Bieb. | - | - | I | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | L |
Anthoxanthum aristatum Boiss. | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | I |
Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 51 | L |
Artemisia absinthium L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | I | 1 | L,P |
Artemisia campestris L. | - | - | - | - | II | 52 | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | L,P |
Artemisia vulgaris L. | III | 152 | + | IV | 253 | II | 4 | IV | 203 | II | 151 | L,P | |
Centaurea jacea L. | - | - | II | 100 | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | M |
Chenopodium album L. | - | - | + | - | - | - | I | 1 | I | 1 | M | ||
Convolvulus arvensis L. | II | 53 | + | I | 51 | I | 1 | II | 101 | I | 50 | P | |
Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist | I | 2 | II | 3 | II | 52 | II | 150 | III | 152 | I | 100 | I,L |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | L |
Daucus carota L. | III | 103 | II | 101 | III | 152 | III | 251 | - | - | - | - | L |
Echinocystis lobata (F.Michx)Torr. and A.Gray | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | I |
Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. | II | 151 | III | 5 | I | 2 | II | 3 | II | 101 | I | 175 | I |
Frangula alnus Mill. | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | L,P |
Fraxinus excelsior L. | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | L |
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | L |
Galeopsis tetrahit L. | - | - | I | 2 | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | II | 101 | L,M |
Geum urbanum L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | III | 201 | II | 150 | L |
Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | L |
Hieracium pilosella L. | IV | 600 | III | 451 | IV | 775 | III | 375 | I | 50 | I | 50 | L |
Hypericum perforatum L. | II | 2 | II | 3 | II | 53 | I | 1 | I | 50 | I | 100 | L,M |
Jasione montana L. | III | 5 | I | 2 | I | 51 | I | 2 | I | 50 | - | - | M |
Lotus corniculatus L. | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | M |
Melilotus alba Medik. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | I | 1 | L,M |
Oenothera biennis L. | II | 151 | III | 103 | IV | 253 | III | 153 | - | - | - | - | M |
Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh. | II | 2 | IV | 6 | IV | 351 | V | 901 | - | - | - | - | I |
Plantago lanceolata L. | I | 50 | - | - | I | 50 | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | L |
Plantago major L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | L |
Plantago media L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | I | 1 | - | - | L,M |
Potentilla anserina L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | L |
Potentilla argentea L. | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | L |
Quercus petraea (Mat.) Liebl. | I | 1 | - | - | I | 1 | I | 2 | 1 | 1 | L | ||
Quercus robur L. | I | 1 | III | r | II | 53 | II | 52 | I | r | - | - | L |
Rubus caesius L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | - | - | - | - | M |
Rumex acetosa L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | II | 4 | I | 100 | I | 225 | M |
Rumex acetosella L. | IV | 204 | III | 153 | III | 202 | II | 102 | I | 50 | I | 50 | M |
Senecio jacobaea L. | I | 51 | I | r | II | 101 | III | 54 | II | 52 | 1 | 175 | L,P |
Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. and Schult. | I | 1 | I | 51 | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | I | ||
Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. | I | 2 | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I |
Solidago canadensis L. | I | 51 | II | 151 | III | 326 | IV | 427 | II | 52 | II | 228 | I,L,M |
Solidago gigantea Aiton | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 100 | - | - | - | - | I,L,M |
Sonchus arvensis L. | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | P |
Sonchus asper (L.) Hill. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | P |
Sonchus oleraceus L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | P |
Sorbus aucuparia L. emend. Hedl. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | L |
Stachys palustris L. | I | 50 | - | - | - | - | I | 2 | - | - | L,M | ||
Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg. | III | 5 | II | 3 | II | 52 | III | 103 | IV | 279 | + | L,M | |
Thlaspi arvense L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | L |
Trifolium pratense L. | - | - | - | - | I | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | M |
Trifolium repens L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | - | - | M |
Urtica dioica L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | I | 50 | II | 53 | II | 150 | L |
Verbascum densiflorum Bertol. | I | 50 | I | 50 | I | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | M |
Vicia cracca L. | II | 52 | I | 2 | I | 100 | I | 2 | I | 50 | - | - | M |
Viola arvensis Murray | II | 4 | III | 5 | II | 151 | - | - | - | - | - | - | L |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Janicka, M.; Kutkowska, A.; Paderewski, J. Diversity of Segetal Flora in Salix viminalis L. Crops Established on Former Arable and Fallow Lands in Central Poland. Agriculture 2021, 11, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11010025
Janicka M, Kutkowska A, Paderewski J. Diversity of Segetal Flora in Salix viminalis L. Crops Established on Former Arable and Fallow Lands in Central Poland. Agriculture. 2021; 11(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11010025
Chicago/Turabian StyleJanicka, Maria, Aneta Kutkowska, and Jakub Paderewski. 2021. "Diversity of Segetal Flora in Salix viminalis L. Crops Established on Former Arable and Fallow Lands in Central Poland" Agriculture 11, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11010025
APA StyleJanicka, M., Kutkowska, A., & Paderewski, J. (2021). Diversity of Segetal Flora in Salix viminalis L. Crops Established on Former Arable and Fallow Lands in Central Poland. Agriculture, 11(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11010025