Next Article in Journal
The Role of Grain Boundary Diffusion in the Solute Drag Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient Dye Contaminant Elimination and Simultaneously Electricity Production via a Bi-Doped TiO2 Photocatalytic Fuel Cell
Previous Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of MoP-RuP2 with Abundant Interfaces to Boost Hydrogen Evolution Reactions in Alkaline Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
Controlled Biosynthesis of ZnCdS Quantum Dots with Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/nano11092346
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Molybdenum Sulfide/Tellurium Hetero-Composite by a Simple One-Pot Hydrothermal Technique for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrode Material

by
Hem Prakash Karki
1,†,‡,
Hyojae Kim
1,†,
Jinmu Jung
1,2,* and
Jonghyun Oh
1,2,*
1
Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, College of Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
2
Department of Nano-Bio Mechanical System Engineering, College of Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Current Address: Department of Environmental Engineering, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong City 30019, Korea.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(9), 2346; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092346
Submission received: 11 August 2021 / Revised: 31 August 2021 / Accepted: 7 September 2021 / Published: 9 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Functional Nanomaterials for Energy Storage Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
It is necessary to investigate effective energy storage devices that can fulfill the requirements of short-term and long-term durable energy outputs. Here, we report a simple one-pot hydrothermal technique through which to fabricate the MoS2/Te nanocomposite to be used as an effective electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors. Comprehensive characterization of the as-fabricated nanomaterial was performed using FESEM, HRTEM, XRD, FTIR, XPS, etc., as well as electrochemical characterizations. The electrochemical characterization of the as-fabricated nanocomposite electrode material showed a high specific capacitance of 402.53 F g−1 from a galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) profile conducted at 1 A g−1 current density. The electrode material also showed significant rate performance with high cyclic stability reaching up to 92.30% under 4000 cycles of galvanostatic charge-discharge profile at a current density of 10 A g−1. The highly encouraging results obtained using this simple synthetic approach demonstrate that the hetero-structured nanocomposite of MoS2/Te electrode material could serve as a promising composite to use in effective supercapacitors or energy storage devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fossil fuels, which are limited natural resources, are being highly exploited due to the urgent need to meet the higher energy demands of society as well as the fast pace of technical advancements in the twenty-first century [1,2,3,4]. The rapid depletion of fossil fuels and the associated environmental pollution must be addressed with the research and development of green and renewable energy technologies for the continuous supply of secure and reliable energy [5,6,7]. Industrial and academic research is currently focusing on the alternative harnessing of energy in an efficient manner to fulfill these energy demands [8]. Among the different types of available devices, batteries and capacitors have attracted substantial attention. Batteries are highly attractive due to their higher energy density, but they possess limited power density compared to that required for the prolonged use of energy. On the other hand, traditional capacitors deliver high power density, but they have low energy storage [9,10,11]. The limitations of both batteries and conventional capacitors, along with the gaps between their performances, can be managed with the intensive exploration of special types of contemporary energy storage tools and techniques, such as electrochemical capacitors, supercapacitors, and ultracapacitors [12]. Supercapacitor devices can be used in various fields—such as in electric vehicles in the automobile industry, military purposes, etc.—due to their fast charge-discharge capacity, high specific capacitance, effective storage capability, good stability, long lifecycle, and significant power density [13,14,15]. These special and unique features of supercapacitors have placed them in the spotlight as alternative energy and power sources to build energy supply systems. The design and development of eco-friendly, high energy density materials for supercapacitor devices would provide an effective and long-term solution to this energy crisis.
Transition metal chalcogenides (TMCs) have attracted substantial attention from researchers due to their typical and interesting physicochemical properties, and they show a wide range of applications, such as energy storage, photovoltaics, and catalysis [16,17]. Among the different TMCs, MoS2 nanostructures have attracted significant research attention as supercapacitors due to their high surface area, effective electrochemical activities, excellent supercapacitance, and sufficient electrical conductivities and stability cycles [18,19]. The MoS2 layers showed binding of atoms with strong covalent bonding, but the different layers of the MoS2 become stacked one over another with the aid of weak Van der Waal bonds. MoS2 provides a site of anchor Te NRs with a significant increase in electrochemical performance due to the good stability of the hybrid structure and its excellent electrical conductivity. The crystal structure of the MoS2 nanosheets is found to be most stable due to the layered structures of the molybdenum atoms which are sandwiched between two layers of sulfur atoms. The two atomic layers of the molybdenum and sulfur are attracted to each other by the presence of weak Van der Wall force. Similarly, MoS2 nanosheets also inhibit the corrosion of other constituent elements present in the composite, thereby ultimately increasing the cyclic stability of the electrode materials. MoS2 shows structural similarity to graphene, as it has a 2D sheet-like structure with suitable spacing, and is expected to be useful for exceptional applications in different fields such as in electrocatalysts, super capacitors, sensors, catalysts, absorbent materials, and anti-friction and anti-wear materials [20,21,22].
Tellurium (Te) is one of the interesting p-type semiconductors having very significant features of supercapacitors, mainly due to its very good electrical conductivity and material density. It is widely used in different energy storage systems, such as in Li-Te batteries [23]. Of the metalloids, it shows excellent metallicity, and it also demonstrates a high semiconductor nature in its hexagonal helical-chain conformation in its crystalline structures, along with a small bandgap of 0.35 eV [24]. When used to prepare composite structures with other elements or compounds, Tellurium exhibits additional electrochemical properties [25,26]. Due to its typical properties, a group of researchers synthesized a three-dimensional rGO/Te nanowires composite that showed stable cyclic performance at 0.2 C with a capacity retention of 88% after 200 cycles [27]. Tsai et al. carried out the electrochemical fabrication of Te nanowires, and they found its specific capacitance to be 25 F g−1 with a performance retention of 46% [28].
In this work, we applied a simple hydrothermal technique through which to fabricate a nanocomposite of MoS2 nanosheets with hexagonal Te NRs to design highly efficient supercapacitance for energy storage devices. To our knowledge, this is a novel design of a MoS2/Te composite that has been synthesized for use in supercapacitor devices. The as-fabricated nanocomposite showed a significant supercapacitor value of 402.53 F g−1 with a rate of performance of 72.01%. When the electrode material was used for a continuous charge-discharge profile up to 4000 cycles at the current density of 1 A g−1, it also showed a good extent of cyclic stability of 92.30%. The high supercapacitance value, good rate capability, and high stability with considerably long lifecycles of the MoS2/Te nanocomposite material confirm it to be a prospective electrode material for high-energy storage applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

All the chemicals and reagents used in this work were of analytical grade. Sodium tellurite (Na2TeO3), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Mw 40 kDa), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidine (NMP), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), hydrazine monohydrate (NH2NH2·H2O), potassium hydroxide (KOH), ammonium molybdate (NH4)2MoO4, and thiourea (NH2CSNH2) were all purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The chemicals were used as obtained without further purification. During all the experimental procedures, DI-water obtained from minipure RO was used.

2.2. Preparation of MoS2/Te Composite

A simple one-pot hydrothermal process was used to synthesize the MoS2/Te nanocomposite. In detail, 0.784 g of ammonium molybdate was put in a 50 mL glass bottle, to which 0.609 g thiourea was added, followed by the addition of 40 mL DI-water. The mixture solution was left for sonication for 30 min. Next, 92.2 mg sodium telluride and 1.00 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW 40 kDa) were added into another glass vial, into which 3.33 mL of ammonium hydroxide and 1.67 mL hydrazine monohydrate were poured, and the vial was then shaken for some time. At this point, the solution mixtures of both vials were poured into a 100 mL Teflon lined vessel, then autoclaved at 195 °C for 24 h. The as-synthesized composite nanoparticles were successively washed with DI-water and ethanol to remove any unwanted chemicals, and they were separated by a centrifuge for 20 min at 4000 rpm. The washed nanocomposite was dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12 h. Similarly, pure MoS2 and pure Te were also prepared under similar conditions using only their respective chemical precursors.

2.3. Characterization

The surface morphology of the nanocomposite was analyzed through field emission scanning microscopy (FESEM, S7400, Hitachi, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan) operated at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM-2010, Orius SC10002, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The crystalline nature and phase of nanocomposite were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα, λ Å = 1.540 (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Similarly, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were taken by an Bomen MB100 spectrometer (ABB, Zürich, Switzerland), and X-ray photoelectron spectra(XPS) were collected with an A1–Kα irradiation source (Kratos AXIS-NOVA, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Nitrogen adsorption–desorption was conducted to analyze the specific surface area of the sample through Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) adsorption/desorption isotherm measurements at 77 K (ASAP 2420, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA).

2.4. Electrochemical Characterization

The electrochemical properties of the composite nanoparticles were examined on a VersaSTATE-3 electrochemical workstation (AMETEK Inc., Berwyn, PA, USA) at room temperature. For the electrochemical experiments, a three-electrode configuration was maintained with 2 M KOH solution as the electrolyte, Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, Pt-wire as the counter electrode, and one of the as-prepared composite particles loaded on Ni-foam as the working electrode. Prior to the formation of the working electrode, the Ni-foam was thoroughly washed with 3 M HCl, acetone, DI-water, and absolute ethanol to remove any impurities or oxide films present on its surface. The supplementary information (SI) describes the detailed process for the formation of the working electrode. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were carried out in the potential range from 0–0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode with different scan rates, and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) experiments were conducted within the potential range 0.00–0.45 V vs. Ag/AgCl as the electrode at different current densities ranging from 1–10 A g−1. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed at open circuit potentials ranging from 10−2 to 105 Hz with an alternating current amplitude of 5 mV, and the results are shown in the form of a Nyquist plot.
The specific capacitance of the as-fabricated electrode material was calculated from the CV profile of the electrode materials using Equation (1) [29,30]:
C = ∫ I d Δ V ʋ Δ V a
where C is the specific electrochemical capacitance (F g−1), I is the applied current in amperes (A), ΔV is the potential range of the CV profile, ʋ is the scan rate (V s−1), and a is the active area of the electrode material (cm2).
Similarly, the specific capacitance (C) of the electrode material was calculated from GCD profiles based on Equation (2) [31,32]:
C = I Δ t m Δ V
where I is the discharge current in amperes (A), Δt is the discharge time in seconds (s), m is the active mass of the electrode material deposited on Ni-foam in grams (g), and ΔV is the potential range of the GCD profile.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Analysis

Nanocomposite materials were successfully prepared by a simple one-pot hydrothermal technique. During synthesis, the MoS2 was produced as nanospheres with an average diameter of ~1 µm, as illustrated in Figure 1. The standard ImageJ software was used to analyze the FESEM images of the samples. Figure 1a shows the FESEM image, which depicts the MoS2 nanospheres that have been produced through the hierarchical agglomeration of MoS2 nanosheets [33]. The spherical structures obtained through nanosheet collection showed a sheet diameter in the range from (8–16) nm, as shown in the inset of Figure 1a. Similarly, the pure Te nanorods (Te NRs) were produced with the length of (250–540) nm and the diameter in the range from (50–110) nm with clear hexagonal sharp edges, as shown in Figure 1b. Similarly, Figure 1c indicates the successful formation of the hetero-structured nanocomposites of MoS2 and Tellurium nanorods (Te NRs). The MoS2/Te composite was successfully synthesized through a simple one-pot hydrothermal method. Figure S1 of the SI shows the elemental mapping of the composite that was carried out, which demonstrated the successful formation of MoS2/Te hetero-structured nanocomposite from its constituent elements by applying the simple one-pot hydrothermal method.
Figure 2 shows the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) that was also used for the morphological analysis of the as-fabricated hetero-structured nanocomposite. The Standard Digital Micrograph software was used to measure the sizes and diameters of the nanocomposites from the HRTEM images. Here, Figure 2a clearly shows the formation of MoS2 nanospheres with the diameter in the range from (340 to 680) nm. Similarly, the pure Te NRs were synthesized as a hexagonal crystal structure, which showed an average diameter in the range from (208 to 400) nm with length in the range from (560 to 1220) nm, as shown in Figure 2b. The formation of MoS2 nanospheres and Te NRs was also verified by the FESEM images previously presented in Figure 1.
Figure 2c shows that the final nanocomposite of MoS2/Te experienced somewhat of a decrease in the size of its components, which was attributed to the presence of a higher molar concentration of the precursor compounds. Crowding of the precursor elements shows the change in the surrounding chemical environment, which is responsible for the decreased dimension of the synthesizing components [34]. Figure 2d shows the HRTEM image of the composite with clear d-spacings of 0.62 nm for MoS2 and 0.23 nm for the Te NRs [25,35], and the inset shows the Fast Fourier transform (FFT) image.
XRD spectra were taken to analyze the structural crystallinity and phase purity of the as-synthesized nanocomposites, as shown in Figure 3a. MoS2 nanosheets showed broad diffraction peaks at (22.88 and 35.91)°, which respectively correspond to the (002) and (100) crystal planes (JCPDS code: 024-0513). The pure Te NRs showed distinct peaks at (27.57, 38.3, and 40.47)°, respectively corresponding to the (101), (012), and (110) peaks of the hexagonal crystal structure of Tellurium (JCPDS code: 01-086-2269). The as-synthesized final composite MoS2/Te showed the presence of characteristic peaks of both components, thus demonstrating the successful formation of the desired MoS2/Te hetero-structured nanocomposite. The nanocomposite was fabricated using a simple one-pot hydrothermal process at 195 °C. This fabrication temperature mostly leads to the production of 2H phase of MoS2 nanosheets. If a nanocomposite fabricated in this way is calcined at a higher temperature of around 1000 °C, then the 1T phase of MoS2 exists. As indicated in the XRD and XPS data, our nanocomposite mostly possesses 2H MoS2 phase with low or no 1T phase.
Similarly, Figure 3b presents the FTIR spectra of the synthesized nanocomposite. The absorption peaks at (1409, 1120, 875, and 751) cm−1 are attributed to MoS2 [36,37]. A broad peak at around 3367.8 cm−1 indicates the presence of the hydroxyl group of water molecules, while the peak corresponding to 1630 cm−1 is the indicative peak for the presence of water molecules in the nanocomposite. Lastly, the peak appearing at 586 cm−1 indicates the presence of Te–O stretching bond vibration [38]. These results further support the successful synthesis of the MoS2/Te hetero-structured nanocompo-site.
Figure 4 shows the surface electrochemical composition and bonding nature of the component elements in the composite that were examined through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 4a shows the low-resolution wide-scan survey spectrum, which reveals the presence of peaks at the binding energies of (161.32, 231.91, 530.29, and 572.43) eV, corresponding to the elements with their respective orbitals, such as S 2p orbital, Mo 3d orbital, O 1s orbital, and Te 3d orbital, respectively, of the hetero-composite. The high-resolution XPS spectra of the individual elements and their orbital positions were recorded, as well. Figure 4b shows the Mo 3d orbital peaks at (232.48 and 229.31) eV, respectively corresponding to the Mo 3d3/2 orbital and Mo 3d5/2 orbital doublet peaks that are due to the +4 oxidation state of molybdenum (Mo4+) in MoS2, and the peak at 226.49 eV that is assigned to the S 2s orbital of MoS2 [22,39]. A very small amount of molybdenum exists in the (VI) oxide form, which indicates the presence of the p-orbital of the oxygen element, with the peak appearing at 530.19 eV assigned to the 1s orbital of oxygen (Figure 4c). Similarly, the doublet peaks of the p-orbital of Sulphur element that are observed at (162.23 and 161.14) eV are respectively correlated with the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 orbitals of Sulphur element, as shown in Figure 4d [40]. Similarly, the 1s orbital of oxygen atom shows the peak position at 530.19 eV. The electrons present in the d-orbital of tellurium show peaks appearing at (582.91 and 572.46) eV, which are respectively attributed to the Te 3d3/2 and Te 3d5/2 orbitals, as shown in Figure 4e.
The nitrogen adsorption–desorption technique at 77 K was used to investigate the specific surface areas and porous structures of the samples, as shown in Figure 5. According to the IUPAC technical report evaluating the surface area and pore size distribution, pure MoS2 and pure Te samples showed the type II physisorption isotherm, as presented in Figure 5a. This type of isotherm results from unrestricted monolayer–multilayer adsorption up to a high p/p0 value, which indicates a significant amount of overlap of the monolayer, which is attributed to the onset of multilayer adsorption. Typically, the thickness of the adsorbed multilayer increases without limit at p/p0 = 1. The final nanocomposite MoS2/Te shows the type IVa physisorption isotherm and the H3 hysteresis loop, and it indicates the formation of meso- and micro-porous structures. This isotherm is observed when the pore width exceeds a certain critical width, which is dependent on the adsorption system and temperature [41]. Similarly, Figure 5b shows the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) curves that were obtained to show the pore size distribution of the samples. These show that the majority of pores lie in the range from 0–50 nm, indicating the presence of micro- and meso-pores in the samples. In addition, the final nanocomposite shows unique meso- and micro-porous structures with a high specific surface area, which could improve the easy electron transfer during electrochemical performance when used as an electrode material. This might be an extra benefit of the electrode material during electrochemical applications [42]. Table 1 lists the BET specific surface area, average pore size, and pore volumes of the samples. The nanosheets and nanorods with a homogenous smooth surface provide low specific surface areas, whereas loading the nanorods or nanoparticles on the surface of the nanosheets imparts a heterogenous rough surface structure which helps increase the specific surface area of the composite system. Adjoining the nanorods on the surface of the nanosheets during the formation of the composite significantly affects the surface roughness, ultimately leading to an improved specific surface area. These show that the incorporation of Te onto MoS2 results in the enhancement of specific surface area, which might be due to the typical roughness generated by the heterostructures of the nanocomposite.

3.2. Electrochemical Performances

The electrochemical activities of the as-prepared nanocomposites were analyzed through cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) on the nanocomposite-coated Ni-foam as the working electrode, Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and Pt-wire as the counter electrode, with 2 M KOH as the electrolyte. The CV profile was investigated with different scan rates ranging from (10–100) mV/s and the potential window from (0.0–0.6) V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode.
Figure 6a demonstrates the redox-type CV curves of the pure MoS2, Te NRs, and MoS2/Te nanocomposite at the scan rate of 10 mV/s obtained under similar conditions, which indicate the Faradaic charge storage mechanism. These curves clearly illustrate the larger integrated area with higher current range of the CV curve for the MoS2/Te nanocomposite, compared to its pure constituent electrode material, which is due to the collective role of both of the component elements present in the nanocomposite. CV curves of Te and MoS2/Te show the presence of double peaks. There are a number of different factors that can substantially alter the diffusion of electrons during the forward and backward potential sweep during the experiment, such as the heterogenous surface structure of the nano or microparticles, band width, and geometry of the electrode materials [43]. Furthermore, the CV performance of MoS2/Te was recorded at different scan rates ranging from (10 to 100) mV/s within the potential range from (0.0 to 0.6) V vs. the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. This produced the typical CV curves shown in Figure 6b. Here, all the CV curves show a pair of reversible redox peaks, which reveal significant differences compared to the electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLC, with ideal rectangular curves). This supports the pseudo-capacitive properties of the as-synthesized MoS2/Te hetero-composite electrode material [44]. The scan rate dependency of the redox current peaks from the CV profile was observed, as well. This shows that the redox current peaks were linearly proportional to the square root of the scan rates, as shown in Figure 6c.
Furthermore, the as-fabricated electrode materials were further investigated using GCD measurements taken at various current densities within the potential range from (0.00 to 0.45) V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode in 2 M KOH electrolyte. Compared to the potential window of the material during CV, the GCD profile shows a slightly narrower range of potential window, which is due to the evolution of gas at low current density. In addition, the GCD curves distinctly demonstrate deviations from the linear charge-discharge curves of the electrochemical double layer capacitor (EDLC), which are also supported by the pseudo-capacitive nature of the material, which is similar to that of the CV profiles, as discussed above. This property is caused by the redox reactions through the adsorption and desorption phenomena of hydroxyl ions within alkaline electrolyte to the electrode interface [45]. With higher scan rates, the oxidation and reduction peaks respectively move to negative and positive potentials, during which the rate of the ion diffusion must be limited to peruse the electronic neutralization of redox reactions. At a lower scan rate, the OH− ions have a sufficient time period to intercalate with the inner and outer surfaces of the electrode. By contrast, at a higher scan rate, the OH− ions do not have sufficient time for such intercalations within the inner and outer surfaces of the electrode.
Figure 6d shows the charge-discharge profile of three different materials at a current density of 1 A g−1. The figure shows that the GCD profile of MoS2/Te has a higher discharge time than the other electrode materials, which is consistent with the CV profile of the same electrode material. The calculation of specific capacitance using the discharge time period at the current density of 1 A g−1 for the different electrode materials shows the specific capacitances of (195.55, 202, and 402.53) F g−1 for MoS2, Te NRs, and the MoS2/Te final nanocomposite, respectively. Furthermore, the specific capacitance of the MoS2/Te was calculated at different current densities ranging from (1 to 10) A g−1, as shown in Figure 6e. From the GCD profile, the specific capacitance for MoS2/Te was calculated for the different current densities of (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10) A g−1, which were obtained as (402.53, 382.41, 367.76, 346.56, 331.00, and 289.87) F g−1, respectively. Figure 6f presents the specific capacitance against different current densities for MoS2/Te. The figure also shows that, even at the higher current density of 10 A g−1, the MoS2/Te composite retains a good rate performance of 72.01%. With the increasing current density, the specific capacitance gradually decreases, which might be due to the variations in the ion diffusion rates. The electrolyte ions also get enough diffusion time to the inner pores of the electrode surfaces for the optimum utilization of the active surface site of the electrode materials [46]. Table 2 presents some recent related works for comparative study.
The observed higher capacitive performance of the as-fabricated electrode material was further confirmed with the aid of EIS data. Figure 7a shows the Nyquist plots for all the three electrode materials recorded with 5 mV amplitude over the frequency range from (0.01 Hz to 100 kHz) associated with open circuit potential (OCP), a clear variation among the different electrodes can easily be visualized. The three plots show the arc patterns of the Nyquist plot in the high-frequency region, while they show a linear pattern in the low-frequency region. The semicircular arc type of the Nyquist plot is correlated with the Faradaic reactions, and its diameter is related to the intrinsic resistance (RS), which is further related to the combined resistance of the electrolyte and electrode materials. Similarly, the charge transfer resistance (RCT) arises from the electronic and ionic resistance at the electrode–electrolyte interface, while the Warburg diffusion resistance (RW) is generated from the resistance of ionic diffusion in the electrolyte and depends on the frequency [54,55]. Here, the intrinsic resistance (RS) is independent of the current density, and it typically remains constant for the given electrolyte and electrode material.
A quantitative calculation of RCT is used to capture the electrochemical activities of the electrode material [56]. The EIS plot of MoS2/Te shows a significant result with a semicircle at the high-frequency region, as well as an almost vertical trend at the low-frequency region, which can be related to the good extent of the capacitive activities. The smaller semicircular diameter and higher slope of the vertical line of MoS2/Te correspond to the small charge transfer resistance leading to the higher conductivity and low electrical impedance, which ultimately show better capacitive performance compared to the pure Te NRs and pure MoS2. Based on the Nyquist plot of the different electrode materials, the charge transfer resistances (RCT) for MoS2, Te NRs, and MoS2/Te composites were found to be 2.18, 1.87, and 1.01 Ω, respectively. Figure S2 illustrates the cyclic stability of the as-fabricated MoS2/Te composite electrode tested continuously for 4000 cycles of the charge-discharge profile at a current density of 10 A g−1. This stability performance retains the capacitive activity up to 92.30%, even after 4000 charge-discharge cycles, thus confirming the sufficient stability and reversibility of the MoS2/Te electrode composite (Figure 7b). The superior capacitive performance of this electrode material might be attributable to the good synergistic effect of the components of heterostructures, low interfacial charge transfer resistance between electrolyte and electrode surface, and fast and reversible electrode–electrolyte interfaces.

4. Conclusions

This work presents a facile one-pot hydrothermal method for the synthesis of MoS2/Te hetero-structured nanocomposite. The in situ hydrothermal reaction of the respective precursor elements successfully produced hetero composite of MoS2 conjugated with Te nanorods, the synergistic effect of which allows it to be utilized as a significant electrode material for an effective supercapacitor device. The various electrochemical profiles recorded for the as-fabricated MoS2/Te electrode material show the high specific capacitance of 402.53 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1 as well as a good rate performance of 72.01%. This electrode material delivered excellent electrochemical stability of 92.30% of the initial specific capacitance, even after the continuous recording of the charge-discharge profiles up to 4000 cycles. This indicates that the prepared electrode material is a promising electrode for use as a material in supercapacitors. The simple hydrothermal technique of its preparation could be scaled up for large-scale preparation of the electrode material for its significant application to energy storage devices. Moreover, the application of this electrode material could also be studied and extended for use in data storage devices, lithium–ion batteries, and catalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11092346/s1. Figure S1: energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis; Figure S2: EIS profile of MoS2/Te before and after the 4000 cycles.

Author Contributions

H.P.K., J.J. and J.O. conceptualized the experimental work; H.P.K. conducted the methodology, material characterization, and wrote the manuscript; H.K. analyzed the data; J.J. and J.O. reviewed and edited the manuscript; J.J. and J.O. managed the project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (grant numbers: NRF-2020R1A4A2002817, 2018R1D1A3B07047434, and 2019R1I1A3A01060695). This paper was supported by research funds of Jeonbuk National University in 2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, A.; Wang, Z.; Li, Q.; Dong, M. Ionic Liquid-Assisted Synthesis of Hierarchical One-Dimensional MoP/NPC for High-Performance Supercapacitor and Electrocatalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 6343–6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, M.; Han, K.; Qi, J.; Li, J.; Teng, Z.; Zhang, J. Heteroatom-Rich Porous Carbons Derived from Nontoxic Green Organic Crystals for High-Performance Symmetric and Asymmetric Supercapacitors with Aqueous/Gel Electrolyte. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 13634–13647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.; Ma, C.; Wen, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhao, X.; Tang, T.; Holze, R.; Mijowska, E. Highly efficient conversion of waste plastic into thin carbon nanosheets for superior capacitive energy storage. Carbon 2021, 171, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Tang, T.; Mijowska, E. Three dimensional graphene/carbonized metal-organic frameworks based high-performance supercapacitor. Carbon 2020, 157, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Najib, S.; Erdem, E. Current progress achieved in novel materials for supercapacitor electrodes: Mini review. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 2817–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yu, P.; Coll, M.; Amade, R.; AlShaikh, I.; Pantoja-Suárez, F.; Pascual, E.; Andújar, J.L.; Serra, E.B.; Bertran, E. Homogeneous Fe2O3 coatings on carbon nanotube structures for supercapacitors. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 4136–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sridhar, D.; Yu, H.; Meunier, J.-L.; Omanovic, S. Carbon nano-fiber forest foundation for ruthenium oxide pseudo-electrochemical capacitors. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hekmat, F.; Shahrokhian, S.; Rahimi, S. 3D flower-like binary nickel cobalt oxide decorated coiled carbon nanotubes directly grown on nickel nanocones and binder-free hydrothermal carbons for advanced asymmetric supercapacitors. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 2901–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, C.; Shi, M.; Tian, Y.; Yang, J.; Song, X.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, P.; Gao, L. Bioinspired pomegranate-like microflowers confining core-shell binary NixSy nanobeads for efficient supercapacitors exhibiting a durable lifespan exceeding 100,000 cycles. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 3432–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mallick, S.; Samanta, A.; Raj, C.R. Mesoporous carbon-supported manganese tungstate nanostructures for the development of zinc–air battery powered long lifespan asymmetric supercapacitor. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 4008–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ouyang, M.; Bertei, A.; Cooper, S.J.; Wu, Y.; Boldrin, P.; Liu, X.; Kishimoto, M.; Wang, H.; Marlow, M.N.; Chen, J.; et al. Model-guided design of a high performance and durability Ni nanofiber/ceria matrix solid oxide fuel cell electrode. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 56, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valdez-Resendiz, J.E.; Rosas-Caro, J.C.; Mayo-Maldonado, J.C.; Claudio-Sanchez, A.; Ruiz-Martinez, O.; Sanchez, V.M. Improvement of ultracapacitors-energy usage in fuel cell based hybrid electric vehicle. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 13746–13756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, P.; Wang, F.; Yu, M.; Zhuang, X.; Feng, X. Two-dimensional materials for miniaturized energy storage devices: From individual devices to smart integrated systems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7426–7451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yu, F.; Zhang, C.; Wang, F.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Waclawik, E.R.; Du, A.; Ostrikov, K.; Wang, H. A zinc bromine “supercapattery” system combining triple functions of capacitive, pseudocapacitive and battery-type charge storage. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, G.Z. Supercapattery: Merit merge of capacitive and Nernstian charge storage mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, Y.; Hamann, T.; Wang, D. Thin film photoelectrodes for solar water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2182–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Poudel, M.B.; Karki, H.P.; Kim, H.J. Silver nanoparticles decorated molybdenum sulfide/tungstate oxide nanorods as high performance supercapacitor electrode. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roger, I.; Moca, R.; Miras, H.N.; Crawford, K.G.; Moran, D.; Ganin, A.Y.; Symes, M.D. The direct hydrothermal deposition of cobalt-doped MoS2 onto fluorine-doped SnO2 substrates for catalysis of the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 5, 1472–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Neetika; Sanger, A.; Malik, V.K.; Chandra, R. One step sputtered grown MoS2 nanoworms binder free electrodes for high performance supercapacitor application. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 11141–11149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, W.; Jiang, B.; Qian, C.; Lv, F.; Feng, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, K.; Yang, C.; Yang, Y.; Guo, S. Pistachio-Shuck-Like MoSe2/C Core/Shell Nanostructures for High-Performance Potassium-Ion Storage. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1801812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yu, M.; Zhao, S.; Feng, H.; Hu, L.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Y.; Tong, Y.; Lu, X. Engineering Thin MoS2 Nanosheets on TiN Nanorods: Advanced Electrochemical Capacitor Electrode and Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1862–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, P.-P.; Sun, H.; Ji, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, X. Three-Dimensional Assembly of Single-Layered MoS2. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wu, K.; Ma, H.; Gao, Y.; Hu, W.; Yang, J. Highly-efficient heterojunction solar cells based on two-dimensional tellurene and transition metal dichalcogenides. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 7430–7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, Z.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.-W.; Yu, S.-H. Emerging tellurium nanostructures: Controllable synthesis and their applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2732–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Qiu, G.; Wang, R.; Huang, S.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Du, Y.; Iii, W.A.G.; Kim, M.J.; Xu, X.; et al. Field-effect transistors made from solution-grown two-dimensional tellurene. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Wu, W.; Goddard, W.A. Tellurium: Fast Electrical and Atomic Transport along the Weak Interaction Direction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 550–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. He, J.; Chen, Y.; Lv, W.; Wen, K.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Qin, W.; He, W. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Reduced Graphene Oxide/Tellurium Nanowires: A High-Performance Freestanding Cathode for Li–Te Batteries. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 8837–8842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tsai, H.-W.; Yaghoubi, A.; Chan, T.-C.; Wang, C.-C.; Liu, W.-T.; Liao, C.-N.; Lu, S.-Y.; Tsung-Cheng, C.; Chueh, Y.-L. Electrochemical synthesis of ultrafast and gram-scale surfactant-free tellurium nanowires by gas–solid transformation and their applications as supercapacitor electrodes for p-doping of graphene transistors. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 7535–7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Fang, Y.; Shi, B.; Huang, F.; Rong, F.; Que, R. Three-dimensional NiCo2O4@NiCo2O4 core–shell nanocones arrays for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Poudel, M.B.; Shinb, M.; Kim, H.J. Polyaniline-silver-manganese dioxide nanorod ternary composite for asymmetric supercapacitor with remarkable electrochemical performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.B.; Yu, M.; Wang, F.X.; Liu, P.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Tong, Y.X.; Yang, G.W. Amorphous nickel hydroxide nanospheres with ultrahigh capacitance and energy density as electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wu, W.; Qi, W.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, X.; Qiu, Y.; Su, D.; Fan, H.; Wang, G. Hollow CeO2 spheres conformally coated with graphitic carbon for high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 463, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.; Ding, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Guo, J. Shell-core MoS2 nanosheets@Fe3O4 sphere heterostructure with exposed active edges for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 715, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zambonino, M.; Quizhpe, E.; Jaramillo, F.; Rahman, A.; Vispo, N.S.; Jeffryes, C.; Dahoumane, S. Green Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles: Current Trends, Biological Properties and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amani, M.; Tan, C.; Zhang, G.; Zhao, C.; Bullock, J.; Song, X.; Kim, H.; Shrestha, V.R.; Gao, Y.; Crozier, K.B.; et al. Solution-Synthesized High-Mobility Tellurium Nanoflakes for Short-Wave Infrared Photodetectors. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 7253–7263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Feng, W.; Chen, L.; Qin, M.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Q.; Miao, Y.; Qiu, K.; Zhang, Y.; He, C. Flower-like PEGylated MoS2 nanoflakes for near-infrared photothermal cancer therapy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yi, M.; Zhang, C. The synthesis of two-dimensional MoS2 nanosheets with enhanced tribological properties as oil additives. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 9564–9573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Alegaonkar, A.P.; Pardeshi, S.K.; Alegaonkar, P.S. Tellurium-reduced graphene oxide two-dimensional (2D) architecture for efficient photo-catalytic effluent: Solution for industrial water waste. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 108, 107994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eda, G.; Yamaguchi, H.; Voiry, D.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.; Chhowalla, M. Photoluminescence from Chemically Exfoliated MoS2. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, Y.-K.; Lee, M.; Lee, G.W.; Eom, K.; Lee, M.-H.; Lee, S.; Joh, H.-I. Amorphous MoSx embedded within edges of modified graphite as fast-charging anode material for rechargeable batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 145352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Manikandan, M.; Subramani, K.; Sathish, M.; Dhanuskodi, S. Hydrothermal synthesis of cobalt telluride nanorods for a high performance hybrid asymmetric supercapacitor. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 13632–13641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ward, K.R.; Lawrence, N.S.; Hartshorne, R.S.; Compton, R.G. The theory of cyclic voltammetry of electrochemically heterogeneous surfaces: Comparison of different models for surface geometry and applications to highly ordered pyrolytic graphite. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 7264–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, C.; Cai, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, L.; Shen, P.K.; Zhang, K. Direct growth of urchin-like ZnCo2O4 microspheres assembled from nanowires on nickel foam as high-performance electrodes for supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 169, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gong, C.; Huang, M.; Zhou, P.; Sun, Z.; Fan, L.; Lin, J.; Wu, J. Mesoporous Co0.85Se nanosheets supported on Ni foam as a positive electrode material for asymmetric supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 362, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Quan, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, G.; Lu, L.; Wang, Z.; Xu, H.; Liu, S.; Min, Q. 3D hierarchical porous CuS flower-dispersed CNT arrays on nickel foam as a binder-free electrode for supercapacitors. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 10906–10914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ji, H.; Luan, A.-L.; Dai, C.-C.; Li, M.; Yang, G.; Hou, W.-H. Highly active free-standing and flexible MoS2/rGO sandwich-structured films for supercapacitor applications. Solid State Commun. 2019, 297, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peng, W.; Wang, W.; Han, G.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of 3D flower-like MoS2/graphene composite as high-performance electrode for capacitive deionization. Desalination 2020, 473, 114191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Askari, M.; Salarizadeh, P.; Seifi, M.; Rozati, S.M.; Beheshti-Marnani, A. Binary mixed molybdenum cobalt sulfide nanosheets decorated on rGO as a high-performance supercapacitor electrode. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 275406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Numan, A.; Duraisamy, N.; Omar, F.S.; Mahipal, Y.K.; Ramesh, K.; Ramesh, S. Enhanced electrochemical performance of cobalt oxide nanocube intercalated reduced graphene oxide for supercapacitor application. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 34894–34902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lim, E.; Jo, C.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, M.-H.; Chun, J.; Kim, H.; Park, J.; Roh, K.C.; Kang, K.; Yoon, S.; et al. High-Performance Sodium-Ion Hybrid Supercapacitor Based on Nb2O5@Carbon Core-Shell Nanoparticles and Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 3711–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yoon, Y.; Lee, M.; Kim, S.K.; Bae, G.; Song, W.; Myung, S.; Lim, J.; Lee, S.S.; Zyung, T.; An, K.-S. A Strategy for Synthesis of Carbon Nitride Induced Chemically Doped 2D MXene for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Arul, N.S.; Han, J.I. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of hexapod-like two dimensional dichalcogenide NiSe2 for supercapacitor. Mater. Lett. 2016, 181, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, J.; Jiang, Y.; Fan, H.; Liu, M.; Zhuo, O.; Wang, X.; Wu, Q.; Yang, L.; Ma, Y.; Hu, Z. Porous 3D Few-Layer Graphene-like Carbon for Ultrahigh-Power Supercapacitors with Well-Defined Structure-Performance Relationship. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, B.; You, W.; Yu, J. Fabrication of a hierarchical NiO/C hollow sphere composite and its enhanced supercapacitor performance. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3731–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, B.; Yang, M.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, D.; Li, H. Graphene-like porous carbon nanosheets derived from salvia splendens for high-rate performance supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2018, 397, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g001 550
Figure 1. FESEM image of: (a) Pure MoS2, (b) pure Te nanorods, and (c) MoS2/Te nanocomposite.
Figure 1. FESEM image of: (a) Pure MoS2, (b) pure Te nanorods, and (c) MoS2/Te nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g001
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g002 550
Figure 2. TEM images of: (a) Pure MoS2, (b) pure Te nanorods, and (c,d) MoS2/Te.
Figure 2. TEM images of: (a) Pure MoS2, (b) pure Te nanorods, and (c,d) MoS2/Te.
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g002
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD and FTIR analyses of samples: (a) XRD spectra and (b) FTIR spectra.
Figure 3. XRD and FTIR analyses of samples: (a) XRD spectra and (b) FTIR spectra.
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g003
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra: (a) Survey spectrum, (b) Mo 3d, (c) O 1s, (d) S 2p, and (e) Te 3d.
Figure 4. XPS spectra: (a) Survey spectrum, (b) Mo 3d, (c) O 1s, (d) S 2p, and (e) Te 3d.
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g004
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g005 550
Figure 5. Surface areas and pore sizes of samples: (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution curves for different samples.
Figure 5. Surface areas and pore sizes of samples: (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution curves for different samples.
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g005
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g006 550
Figure 6. Electrochemical performances: (a) CV profiles for different nanoparticles and composites (scan rate: 10 mV/s, potential: (0–0.6) V, and ref. electrode: Ag/AgCl), (b) CV profiles for MoS2/Te at different scan rates, (c) anodic and cathodic peak current vs. Sq. root of scan rates, (d) GCD profiles of different nanoparticles and composites, (e) GCD profiles for MoS2/Te at different current densities, and (f) specific capacitance of MoS2/Te at different current densities. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Electrochemical performances: (a) CV profiles for different nanoparticles and composites (scan rate: 10 mV/s, potential: (0–0.6) V, and ref. electrode: Ag/AgCl), (b) CV profiles for MoS2/Te at different scan rates, (c) anodic and cathodic peak current vs. Sq. root of scan rates, (d) GCD profiles of different nanoparticles and composites, (e) GCD profiles for MoS2/Te at different current densities, and (f) specific capacitance of MoS2/Te at different current densities. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (p < 0.05).
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g006
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g007 550
Figure 7. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies of samples: (a) Nyquist plots of the different electrode materials recorded at (0.01 Hz to 100 kHz) and (b) cycling stability up to 4000 cycles.
Figure 7. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies of samples: (a) Nyquist plots of the different electrode materials recorded at (0.01 Hz to 100 kHz) and (b) cycling stability up to 4000 cycles.
Nanomaterials 11 02346 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparative study of the BET parameters of the samples.
Table 1. Comparative study of the BET parameters of the samples.
SamplesBET Specific Surface Area (m2 g−1)Total Pore Volume (VT, cm3 g−1)Mean Pore Diameter (nm)
MoS26.9920.04928.538
Te10.5130.02710.426
MoS2/Te18.2120.11024.286
Table
Table 2. Comparison of recent composite electrodes based on electrolyte, test conditions, specific capacitance, and capacitance retention.
Table 2. Comparison of recent composite electrodes based on electrolyte, test conditions, specific capacitance, and capacitance retention.
Composite ElectrodeElectrolyteTest ConditionSpecific
Capacitance		Capacitance RetentionRef.
MoS2/rGO1 M H2SO40.5 A g−1365 F g−183% after
5000 cycles		[47]
MoS2/rGO1 M Na2SO41 A g−1198.6 F g−1–[48]
MoS2/CoS2/rGO2 M KOH0.5 mA cm−2190 mF cm−288.6% after
5000 cycles		[49]
rGO-Co3O41 M KOH200 mA g−1278 F g−191.6% after
2000 cycles		[50]
Nb2O5@C/rGO1 M NaPF60.025 A g−1285 mA h g−192% after
1000 cycles		[51]
MoS21 M Na2SO41 A g−1138 F g−186% after
5000 cycles		[19]
p-C3N4-Ti2CTx6 M KOH1 A g−1327 F g−196.2% after
5000 cycles		[52]
V2CTxMXeneSeawater0.2 A g−1181.1 F g−189.1% after
5000 cycles		[49]
NiSe21 M KOH1 mA cm−275 F g−194% after
5000 cycles		[53]
MoS2/Te2 M KOH1 A g−1402 F g−192.30% after
4000 cycles		This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karki, H.P.; Kim, H.; Jung, J.; Oh, J. Synthesis of Molybdenum Sulfide/Tellurium Hetero-Composite by a Simple One-Pot Hydrothermal Technique for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrode Material. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092346

AMA Style

Karki HP, Kim H, Jung J, Oh J. Synthesis of Molybdenum Sulfide/Tellurium Hetero-Composite by a Simple One-Pot Hydrothermal Technique for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrode Material. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(9):2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karki, Hem Prakash, Hyojae Kim, Jinmu Jung, and Jonghyun Oh. 2021. "Synthesis of Molybdenum Sulfide/Tellurium Hetero-Composite by a Simple One-Pot Hydrothermal Technique for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrode Material" Nanomaterials 11, no. 9: 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092346

APA Style

Karki, H. P., Kim, H., Jung, J., & Oh, J. (2021). Synthesis of Molybdenum Sulfide/Tellurium Hetero-Composite by a Simple One-Pot Hydrothermal Technique for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrode Material. Nanomaterials, 11(9), 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop