Next Article in Journal
From Structure to Sensing: Molecular Mechanistic Insights into Plant-Derived Carbon Dots for Heavy Metal Ion Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Pyroelectric Nanogenerator Performance of P(VDF-TrFE)/rGO Thin Film by Optimized rGO Reduction
Previous Article in Journal
An MIP-Based PFAS Sensor Exploiting Nanolayers on Plastic Optical Fibers for Ultra-Wide and Ultra-Low Detection Ranges—A Case Study of PFAS Detection in River Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Contact Pad Design for Silver Nanowire-Based Transparent Heater to Improve Heating Characteristics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transition Metal-Doped Layered Iron Vanadate (FeV3-xMxO9.2.6H2O, M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) for Enhanced Energy Storage Properties

Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(21), 1765; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211765
Submission received: 7 October 2024 / Revised: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 October 2024 / Published: 3 November 2024

Abstract

:
With its distinctive multiple electrochemical reaction, iron vanadate (FeV3O9.2.6H2O) is considered as a promising electrode material for energy storage. However, it has a relatively low practical specific capacitance. Therefore, using the low temperature sol–gel synthesis process, transition metal doping was used to enhance the electrochemical performance of layered structured FeV3O9.2.6H2O (FVO). According to this study, FVO doped with transition metals with larger interlayer spacing exhibited superior electrochemical performance than undoped FVO. The Mn-doped FVO electrode showed the highest specific capacitance and retention of 143 Fg−1 and 87%, respectively, while the undoped FVO showed 78 Fg−1 and 54%.

1. Introduction

Population growth coupled with technological advances to achieve an industrialized society has led to increasing energy demands, thereby putting pressure on the already depleted fossil fuel and other non-renewable energy sources. Renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and geothermal energies, among others, have been developed over the years to lessen the over-dependence on fossil fuels as well as their environmental concerns [1,2]. Despite the successes of renewable energy sources over the years, they are unreliable due to natural intermittent fluctuations, which hinder their usage when connected to electric grids. In view of this, electrochemical energy storage systems such as batteries and supercapacitors are considered effective systems to mitigate the challenges and effectively utilize renewable energy sources [3]. Compared to other electrochemical energy storage systems, Supercapacitors have long life cycle, high specific capacitance and high power density, as well as being environmentally friendly. This makes supercapacitors promising potential energy storage systems and its utilization has been seen in various applications [4,5,6,7,8].
Of much interest recently are binary metal oxides, due to their multiple oxidation states and high electrical conductivity, which results in superior electrochemical performance compared to their corresponding single-metal oxides. Among the binary oxides, metal vanadates, with the general formula MxVyOz, are considered a promising material for supercapacitor applicationsdue to their layered structure, synergistic effect between vanadium and transition metal, excellent kinetics, and high capacity [9,10,11,12]. One of such materials is iron vanadate, which exists in various phases (Navajoite, Fervanite, and Kazakhstanite) [13], where the Kazakhstanite phase (FeV3O9.2.6H2O or Fe5V15O39(OH)9.9H2O) with comparatively larger interlayer spacing and layered structure has caught the attention of researchers and has seen its usage in a range of applications [14,15,16,17,18]. In recent report, Mawuse et al. obtained layered iron vanadate phosphate with lesser water content (FeV3O9.2.1H2O) compared to the theoretical water content (FeV3O9.2.6H2O) via the low temperature sol–gel method. The material was successfully used as an electrode material for two-electrode symmetric supercapacitor application in an aqueous electrolyte [19]. However, enhancing its specific capacitance as positive electrode material in aqueous supercapacitance application is desirable.
Up until now, a great deal of work has gone into improving the ionic and electronic conductivity, suppressing side reactions, and reducing surface degradations of energy conversion materials [20,21,22,23]. Transition metal doping is considered one of the efficient methods for enhancing the intrinsic electrical characteristics of transition metal oxides among other electrochemical properties [24,25,26]. Additionally, the doped element enhanced structural stability by acting as a pillar to prevent lattice collapse and structural distortion, suppressing unwanted electrochemical side reactions, thereby improving the rate performance and cycle stability [27,28,29]. Three-dimensional transition metal interstitial doping has been proposed as an efficient means of improving the spintronic (electronic and magnetic) properties of VI3 monolayers based on first-principles calculations [30]. Chu et al.’s investigation revealed that Nb doping is capable of effectively stabilizing the structure of Ni-rich NCM at high voltage while suppressing the Li/Ni disordering, which enhances electrochemical performance [31]. Also, Jian et al. by DFT calculation and experimental methods demonstrated that Co/Zn co-doped NCNF exhibited improved catalytic activity with superior power density of 0.603 Wcm−3, compared to their mono-doped (Co or Zn) samples, by reducing the dissociative barrier of the –OOH intermediate during ORR [32]. Additionally, compared to pristine Mn3O4, transition metal-doped Mn3O4 nanocrystals have been found to exhibit a high specific capacitance and superior cycling stability [26,33]. Additional reports provided evidence of the role of transition metal doping in transition metal oxides to improve their electrochemical performances [34,35].
To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the impact of metal doping on layered iron vanadate’s electrochemical performance. The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of transition metal doping on enhancing the electrochemical performance of iron vanadate in an aqueous supercapacitor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Synthesis

The sol–gel method was used to synthesize individual transition metal-doped Fe(V2M)O9.2.6H2O (M = Co, Mn, Ni and Zn) as reported in a previous report [19]. All reagents used in this work were analytical grade. In a typical experiment, 2 mmol NH4VO3 and 1mmol of individual transition metal precursors [Co(NO3)2.6H2O, Mn(NO3)2.4H2O, Ni(NO3)2.6H2O and Zn(NO3)2.6H2O] were dissolved in 100 mL D.I. water and stirred at 90 °C for 1 h. 0.1 M Fe(NO3)3.9H2O solution was subsequently added drop-wise to the solution under stirring and kept for l hour at 90 °C. After cooling, the precipitate was collected and washed several times by centrifugation and dried overnight at 80 °C in air to obtain various transition metal-doped Fe(V2M)O9.2.6H2O (M = Co, Mn, Ni and Zn) henceforth referred to as Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn. Pristine FeV3O9.2.6H2O was also synthesized and, thus, referred to as FVO.

2.2. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to identify the structural phase of the materials using a laboratory Rigaku Ultima V diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation source. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JOEL-7800F, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100Plus, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan) were used to observe the morphology and elemental distribution in the material. The elemental composition of the sample was characterized usi-ng X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, mono, K-alpha—Thermo UK system, Horsham, UK). Bond structure analysis was conducted by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, PerkinElmer, Beaconsfield, UK).

2.3. Electrochemical Test

Electrodes were prepared with FVO and its transition metal-doped samples, acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) (as an active material, conductive material, and binder, respectively) in a ratio of 7:2:1 was mixed with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as a solvent to form a slurry. The slurry is then pasted on a nickel foam substrate and dried under a vacuum at 120 °C for 5 h to obtain the working electrode. The electrochemical properties (such as galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD)), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the electrodes were obtained via a three-electrode system (Biologic SP-150 workstation, BioLogic, Paris, France) in 3M KOH aqueous electrolyte, where FVO and its transition metal-doped samples, Ag/AgCl electrode and platinum wire, served as a working reference and counter electrodes, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

The photo of the synthesized samples displaying their respective colors is shown in Figure S1, where Mn-doped FVO shows a distinctive color that is completely different from the brown color of all other samples. According to the defect chemistry theory, an externally doped metal atom or ion is frequently the dominant component regulating the access to the material’s internal structure by substituting lattice atoms and generating distortions or defects [36]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that the dopant’s site of occupancy will affect the material’s characteristics; therefore, knowing the dopant’s site of occupancy is essential to understand the relationships between the properties and the electrochemical behaviors of the materials. According to Keyan et al. [37], the occupancy site preference of a dopant can be theoretically predicted based on their respective ionic radius and electronegativity, according the equation;
D M = X D X M X M + ( r D r M r M )
where DM is the degree of deviation, XD and rD are electronegativity and radius of the dopant, and XM and rM are the electronegativity and radius of the substituted ion. For all the doped materials, as presented in Table 1, the degree of deviation for vanadium is less than that of iron, based on the respective ionic radius [38] and electronegativity [39] of the transition metals (Table S1). This suggests that the dopants will preferentially occupy the vanadium site in the FeV3O9.2.6H2O structure to form FeV2MO9.2.6H2O (M = Co, Mn, Ni and Zn).
The powder XRD patterns of FeV2MO9.2.6H2O (M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) samples are displayed in Figure 1a. All the samples’ diffraction peaks can be indexed to the single-phase FeV3O9.2.6H2O monoclinic structure, which has a space group C*/c-15 and lattice parameters a = 11.84 Å, b = 3.65 Å, and c = 21.27 Å, which are in agreement with the reported ICDC: 00-0-46-1334 [40,41]. All the doped samples show a modest shift in the diffraction peak at ~8.4° towards a lower angle (Figure 1b), indicating that the various transition metals have successful partially substituted V in the host lattice. This can be attributed to the larger ionic radii of the dopants (Co2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+) than V4+, as indicated in Table S1. As a result, the doped samples d-spacing increased, as shown in Table 2, which was determined using Bragg’s law of diffraction.
d = n ʎ 2 s i n Ɵ
The crystallite size of the samples is calculated from their respective full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the peak position of the most intense diffraction peak (~8.3°) by the Scherrer equation;
D = k λ β c o s θ
As summarized in Table 2, all the doped samples had smaller crystallite size than the pristine undoped sample. The Mn-doped FVO sample has the smallest crystallite size of 43.88 as opposed to 126.13 for pristine FVO. The bond structure of the pristine FVO remains unaffected by the doping of the transition metal, as shown by the FTIR study shown in Figure 1c. However, slight changes observed in the -OH bands (adsorbed water) could explain the fact that doping affects the amount of adsorbed water in the material.
Additionally, the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm analysis (Figure 1d) demonstrates that the transition metal enhanced the specific surface area with the Mn-doped sample exhibiting the highest specific surface area of 88.71 m2g−1, compared to other samples, as shown in Table 3. The high surface area is essential to enhance ionic diffusivity, resulting in improved electrochemical performance.
Figure 2 displays the samples’ FE-SEM and TEM images. The pristine FVO sample (Figure 2a,f) displayed a non-uniform plate-like morphology, whereas Co (Figure 2b,g), Ni (Figure 2d,i), and Zn (Figure 2e,j) samples showed a mixture of nanoparticles and nanosheets. However, the Mn-doped sample showed a mixture of nanoparticle and nanorod morphology. This unique morphology of the Mn sample is expected to improve electrochemical properties as it is expected to provide enhanced kinetic properties through 1D networks, as well as enhanced ionic diffusivity through direct contact between the electrolyte and particles [20,42].
XPS measurements were employed to obtain the elemental compositions as well as to confirm successful transition metal doping of the samples. It is confirmed that all the samples contain a fundamental composition of Fe, V and O, as shown in Figure S2. The comparison of Fe 2p spectra of the samples (Figure S2a) shows no visible shift in their peak position, which indicates that the doped metal did not substitute the Fe site in the material. This is in agreement to the occupancy site preference of the dopants obtained via theoretical computation, as shown in Table 1. Furthermore, the deconvoluted V 2p spectra of all the samples were displayed in Figure 3a, where three major peaks assigned to V3+, V4+, and V5+ were obtained. However, careful comparison as illustrated in Figure S2b shows that, the metal-doped samples had lower binding energies ranging from ~516.49 eV to 516.19 eV, as compared to ~516.61 eV for pristine FVO sample. This phenomenon can be attributed to the reduction in the oxidation state of V as a result of charge compensation and balance of valence state.
Additionally, the deconvoluted O 1s spectra of the samples were illustrated in Figure 3b, with four peaks assigned as (i) metal oxides, (ii) metal-hydrogen-oxide, (iii) surface adsorbed H2O, and (iv) chemisorbed or intercalated adsorbed H2O [19,43]. Further comparison of the O 1s spectra shows a shift to lower binding energy for all the doped materials compared to the pristine FVO sample (Figure S2c), which can be attributed to the formation of the dopant oxides, thereby confirming successful metal doping. Given that the dopant oxides have lower Gibbs formation energy than VO2, as indicated in Table S2 [38], it is anticipated that the successful doping to partially substitute V4+ in FeV3O9.2.6H2O will lower the bond strength. This phenomenon has the ability to decrease the interaction repulsion energy between potassium and potassium ions, which will enhance K+ diffusivity and improve electrochemical performances [44]. Furthermore, successful metal doping was confirmed by XPS, which shows Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn spectra, as shown in Figure 4.
Using a three-electrode system in a 3 M KOH aqueous electrolyte, the effect of transition metal doping on the electrochemical properties of FeV3O9.2.6H2O was examined for supercapacitor application. The CV profiles of the electrodes at a scan rate of 20 mVs−1 and voltage window of 0.0–0.4 V are compared in Figure 5a, where all the samples showed identical anodic and cathodic peak shapes, indicating similar electrochemical reaction mechanism of characteristic pseudocapacitive behavior [19]. The metal-doped samples, however, have comparatively larger enclosed areas and peak currents. The Mn-doped sample exhibited the largest peak current, indicating that it has a higher capacitance than all other FVO samples. Figure S3a–e displays the CV profiles for pristine FVO and metal-doped (Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) electrodes at different scan rates (10–50 mVs−1) and voltage windows 0–0.4 V. These profiles indicate strong reaction reversibility, which is demonstrated by well-maintained potential plateau shapes along with a characteristic peak shift with increasing scan rates.
The galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of pristine and metal-doped FVO electrodes are compared in Figure 5b, measured at a voltage window of 0.0–0.35 V and current density of 0.5 Ag−1. The metal-doped FVO electrodes showed longer discharge times than that of pristine FVO, which translates into a specific capacitance of 97, 143, 119, and 107 Fg−1 for Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn, respectively, which are larger than 78 Fg−1 for pristine FVO. The rate capability of all the electrodes is presented in Figure 5c and their corresponding galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles are shown in Figure S4a–e. In comparison to pristine FVO, which had a specific capacitance of 47 Fg−1 and a capacitance retention of 58%, the metal-doped electrodes demonstrated improved rate performance, with high specific capacitance of 61, 140, 88, and 75 Fg−1, which corresponded to capacitance retention of 62.7, 92.6, 73.8, and 65.5%, respectively, at a high current density of 10 Ag−1 for Co-, Mn-, Ni-, and Zn-doped FVO, respectively. Furthermore, after 4000 cycles, the metal-doped FVO electrodes demonstrated enhanced cycle stability with capacitance retention of 69, 87, 73, and 71% for Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn electrodes, respectively. These are higher than 54% for pristine FVO, as shown in Figure 5d. The enhanced electrochemical performances of the transition metal-doped FVO electrodes can be ascribed to their larger d-spacing and shorter bond lengths, which increased ion diffusivity. This is further confirmed by the EIS analysis shown in Figure S5.
Furthermore, the so-called b-value was evaluated using the power law relationship [43] to investigate the electrochemical reaction mechanism of the electrodes. As displayed in Figure 6a, all the electrodes have b-values indicating that their reactions are controlled by both surface and diffusion processes. Using Dunn’s method [43,45], the contribution ratio of the reaction mechanisms at various scan rates was further examined.
The k1 and k2 values, which are shown in Table S3, were obtained from Figure 6b. It is observed that, regardless of the applied scan rate, the metal-doped FVO electrodes exhibited a higher contribution from the surface-controlled (capacitive) process than that of diffusion-controlled process as demonstrated in Figure 6c and Figure S6a–d. For instance, in Mn-doped FVO at a scan rate of 20 mVs−1, the surface-driven process contributes 43.5% to the capacitance, which is equivalent to 56.5% of the diffusion-driven process (Figure 6d).

4. Conclusions

FeV3O9.2.6H2O doped with different transition metals (M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) was successfully synthesized using the sol–gel method. In comparison to the undoped FVO sample, the doped metal’s larger ionic sizes led to larger interlayer spacing and smaller crystallite sizes. To achieve charge neutrality in the material, the lower oxidation state of the dopants (M2+) led to a reduction in the oxidation state of V. Furthermore, as compared to the undoped FVO, the doped samples’ superior electrochemical properties are ascribed to the ionic diffusivity boosted by the reduced bond lengths attributed to lower Gibbs formation energies of the dopant transition metal oxides (M-O). Transition metal-doped FVO electrodes were shown to demonstrate superior electrochemical performances, with the highest specific capacitance of 143 Fg−1 recorded by the Mn-doped FVO electrode as compared to 78, 97, 119, and 107 Fg−1 for undoped FVO, Co, Ni, and Zn-doped electrodes, respectively. Additionally, with 87% capacitance retention, the Mn-doped FVO electrode demonstrated better rate performance and cycle stability than undoped FVO, Co-, Ni-, and Zn-doped FVO electrodes, which were 54, 69, 73, and 71%, respectively. The superior performance of Mn-doped FVO can be attributed to its larger d-spacing and lower crystallite size due to its 1D morphology.
It is believed that this work will pave the way for further research on doping in FeV3O9·2.6H2O samples for enhanced electrochemical performance in supercapacitor applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14211765/s1, Figure S1: Photographs of synthesized undoped and transition metal-doped FVO samples; Table S1: Ionic radius and electronegativity values of transition metals; Table S2: Gibbs formation energy values of the various transition metal oxides (Ref. [32]); Figure S2: XPS peaks of (a) Fe 2p, (b) V 2p, and (c) O1s for all samples; Figure S3: CV curves at various scan rates and galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles at various current densities, respectively, of (a,f) pristine, (b,g) Co-doped, (c,h) Mn-doped, (d,i) Ni-doped, and (e,j) Zn-doped FVO electrodes; Figure S4: Galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles at various current densities of; (a) pristine (b) Co-doped (c) Mn-doped (d) Ni-doped and (e) Zn-doped; FVO electrodes; Figure S5: EIS data of all electrodes compared; Table S3: k1 and k2 values of electrodes obtained from a plot of i/v1/2 vs. v1/2; Figure S6: Contribution ratio of capacitive-controlled process to the capacitance of (a) pristine, (b) Co-doped, (c) Ni-doped, and (d) Zn-doped FVO electrodes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.-A.; methodology, M.A.-A.; investigation, M.A.-A.; data curation, M.A.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.-A.; writing—review and editing, J.I.H.; supervision, J.I.H.; funding acquisition, J.I.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20015786, Technology Development and Demonstration for Improving performance and reliability of Core Components in Hydrogen Refueling Station) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Korea. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Data Availability Statement

Upon reasonable request, the corresponding author will provide the data reported in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chakraborty, S.; Mary, N.L. Review-an overview on supercapacitors and its applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 020552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amedzo-Adore, M.; Han, J.I. Chemically lithiated layered VOPO4 by microwave-assisted hydrothermal method and its electrochemical properties in rechargeable Li-ion batteries and supercapacitor applications. J. Alloy Compd. 2022, 911, 165067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chatterjee, D.P.; Nandi, A.K. A review on the recent advances in hybrid supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 15880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jalal, N.I.; Ibrahim, R.I.; Oudah, M.K. A review on supercapacitors: Types and components. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1973, 012015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miller, J.R.; Simon, P. Electrochemical capacitors for energy management. Science 2008, 321, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huggins, R.A. Supercapacitors and electrochemical pulse sources. Solid State 2000, 134, 179–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.J.M. Tarascon, Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2000, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yao, G.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, T. Nanostructured transition metal vanadates as electrodes for pseudo-supercapacitors: A review. J. Nanopart. Res. 2021, 23, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ni, S.; Liu, J.; Chao, D.; Mai, L. Vanadate-based materials for Li-ion batteries: The search for anodes for practical applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Low, W.H.; Khiew, P.S.; Lim, S.S.; Siong, C.W.; Ezeigwe, E.R. Recent development of mixed transition metal oxide and graphene/mixed transition metal oxide based hybrid nanostructures for advanced supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 775, 1324–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, M.C.; Kong, L.B.; Kang, L.; Li, X.; Walsh, F.C.; Xing, M.; Lu, C.; Ma, X.J.; Luo, Y.C. Synthesis and characterization of M3V2O8 (M = Ni or Co) based nanostructures: A new family of high performance pseudocapacitive materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wei, Q.; Wang, Q.; Li, Q.; An, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Peng, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Tan, S.; Yan, M.; Mai, L. Pseudocapacitive layered iron vanadate nanosheets cathode for ultrahigh-rate lithium ion storage. Nano Energy 2018, 47, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chae, M.S.; Setiawan, D.; Kim, H.J.; Hong, S.T. Layered iron vanadate as a high-capacity cathode material for nonaqueous calcium-ion batteries. Batteries 2021, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Qian, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, Q.; Tan, S.; Zhao, K.; Yang, W.; An, Q.; Guo, Y.; et al. Sodium ion capacitor using pseudocapacitive layered ferric vanadate nanosheets cathode. iScience 2018, 6, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Si, Y.; Liu, G.; Deng, C.; Liu, W.; Li, H.; Tang, L. Facile synthesis and electrochemical properties of amorphous FeVO4 as cathode materials for lithium secondary batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 787, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rani, B.J.; Ravi, G.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Kumar, P.; Hong, S.I.; Velauthapillai, D.; Thambidurai, M.; Dang, C. Ni supported anorthic phase FeVO4 nanorods for electrochemical water oxidation. Mater. Lett. 2020, 275, 128091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaneti, Y.V.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; Bu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yu, A. Synthesis of platinum-decorated iron vanadate nanorods with excellent sensing performance toward n-butylamine. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 236, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amedzo-Adore, M.; Han, J.I. All layered iron vanadate (FeV3O9.2.1H2O as electrode for symmetric supercapacitor application in aqueous electrolyte. J. Alloy Compd. 2023, 938, 168641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, J.H.; Han, D.W.; Jo, M.; Song, K.; Kim, Y.; Chou, S.; Liu, H.K.; Kang, Y.M. Na3V2(PO4)3 particles partly embedded in carbon nanofibers with superb kinetics for ultra-high power sodium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Han, C.; Xia, Q.; Zhang, K.; Chou, S.; Kang, Y.M.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.K.; Dou, S.X. Remarkable enhancement in sodium-ion kinetics of NaFe2(CN)6 by chemical bonding with graphene. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1700346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Z.; Li, G.; Sun, J.; Xie, L.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, S. High performance cathode material based on Na3V2(PO4)2F3 and Na3V2(PO4)3 for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Stor. Mater. 2020, 25, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mishra, A.; Bera, G.; Mal, P.; Padmaja, G.; Sen, P.; Das, P.; Chakraborty, B.; Turpu, G.R. Comparative electrochemical analysis of rGO-FeVO4 nanocomposite and FeVO4 for supercapacitor application. Appl. Surface Sci. 2019, 488, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, K.; Kim, D.; Hu, Z.; Park, M.; Noh, G.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lau, V.W.; Chou, S.; Cho, M.; et al. Manganese based layered oxides with modulated electronic and thermodynamic properties for sodium ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yousefipour, K.; Sarraf-Mamoory, R.; Yourdkhani, A. Iron-doped as an effective strategy to enhance supercapacitive properties of nickel molybdate. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 296, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, R.; Ye, Q.; Kuang, L.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tan, G.; Wen, Y.; Wang, F. Enhanced supercapacitor performance of Mn3O4 nanocrystals by doping transition-metal ions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 9508–9516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fengxia, F.; Ruixin, Z.; Tin, Z.; Haoyang, X.; Xiaojuan, W.; Xinxiang, W.; Guilei, T.; Shuhan, W.; Chenrui, Z.; Wei, X.; et al. Cation-ordered Ni-rich positive electrode material with superior chemical and structural stability enabled by atomic substitution for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 147181. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chenrui, Z.; Ruixin, Z.; Fengxia, F.; Xinxiang, W.; Guilei, T.; Sheng, L.; Pengfei, L.; Chuan, W.; Shuhan, W.; Chaozhu, S. Phase compatible surface engineering to boost the cycling stability of single-crystalline Ni-rich cathode for high energy density lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2024, 72, 103788. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chenrui, Z.; Fengxia, F.; Ruixin, Z.; Xinxiang, W.; Guilei, T.; Sheng, L.; Pengfei, L.; Chuan, W.; Shuhan, W.; Chaozhu, S. Structural and charge regulation strategy enabling superior cycling stability of Ni-rich cathode materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 11377–11388. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sun, C.; Luo, X. Tuning the magnetic and electronic properties of monolayer VI3 by 3d transition metal doping: A first-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 571, 151208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chu, M.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Wang, R.; Shao, T.; Wang, C.; Zhu, W.; He, L.; Chen, J.; Zhao, W.; et al. Enhancing the electrochemical performance and structural stability of Ni-rich layered cathode materials via dual-site doping. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 19950–19958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jian, Z.; Feiteng, W.; Qingqing, C.; Guoliang, W.; Lushan, M.; Chi, C.; Lijun, Y.; Zhiqing, Z.; Daiqian, X.; Hui, Y. Cobalt/zing dual-sites coordinated with nitrogen in nanofibers enabling efficient and durable oxygen reduction reaction in acidic fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 3686. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shunmugapriya, B.; Rose, A.; Maiyalagan, T.; Vijayakumar, T. Effect of cobalt doping on the electrochemical performance of trimanganese tetraoxide. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 285401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, X.; Yue, L.; Zhang, S.; Feng, Y.; An, L.; Wang, M.; Mi, J. Nickel-doped cobalt molybdate nanorods with excellent cycle stability for aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2020, 45, 8853–8865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, X.; Wei, Z.; Ma, L.; Liang, J.; Zhang, X. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of Co-doped ZnMn2O4 hollow nanospheres. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2020, 43, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; Lin, M.; Zhang, D.; Ren, X.; Yuan, Q. Doping effect of Nb5+ on the microstructure and defects of LiFePO4. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A402–A409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, K.; Shao, J.; Xue, D. Site selectivity in doped polyanion cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2013, 6, 1350043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dean, J.A. Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 15th ed.; McGraw Hill, INC: Columbus, OH, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, K.; Xue, D. Estimation of electronegativity values of elements in different valence states. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 11332–11337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ankinovich, E.A.; Bekenova, G.K.; Podlipaeva, N.I. A new hydrous ferrovanadian mineral kazakhstanite Fe53+V34+V125+O39(OH)9.8.55H2O from a carbonaceious-siliceous formation in NW karatau (South Kazakhstan). Zap. Vses. Mineral. Obshch. 1989, 118, 95–100. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  41. Poizot, P.; Laruelle, S.; Touboul, M.; Tarascon, J.M. Wet-chemical synthesis of various iron (III) vanadates (V) by co-precipitation route. C.R. Chim. 2003, 6, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shin, J.; Yang, J.; Sergey, C.; Song, M.S.; Kang, Y.M. Carbon nanofibers heavy laden with Li3V2(PO4)3 particles featuring superb kinetics for high-power lithium ion battery. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Amedzo-Adore, M.; Yang, J.H.; Han, D.; Chen, M.; Agyeman, D.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, R.; Kang, Y.M. Oxygen-deficient P2-Na0.7Mn0.75Ni0.25O2-x cathode by a reductive NH4HF2 treatment for highly reversible Na-ion storage. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 8036–8044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Park, J.S.; Kim, J.; Park, W.B.; Sun, Y.K.; Myung, S.T. Effect of Mn in Li3V2-xMnx(PO4)3 as high capacity cathodes for lithium batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40307–40316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Amedzo-Adore, M.; Han, J.I. Investigating the pseudo-capacitive properties of interlayer engineered VOPO4 by organic molecule intercalation. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 26226–26232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) PXRD patterns, (b) Expanded PXRD patterns, (c) FTIR spectra, and (d) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm of undoped and doped FVO samples compared.
Figure 1. (a) PXRD patterns, (b) Expanded PXRD patterns, (c) FTIR spectra, and (d) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm of undoped and doped FVO samples compared.
Nanomaterials 14 01765 g001
Figure 2. FE-SEM and TEM images of (a,f) FVO, (b,g) Co, (c,h) Mn, (d,i) Ni, and (e,j) Zn samples.
Figure 2. FE-SEM and TEM images of (a,f) FVO, (b,g) Co, (c,h) Mn, (d,i) Ni, and (e,j) Zn samples.
Nanomaterials 14 01765 g002
Figure 3. (a) V 2p spectra, and (b) O 1s spectra of all samples compared.
Figure 3. (a) V 2p spectra, and (b) O 1s spectra of all samples compared.
Nanomaterials 14 01765 g003
Figure 4. (a) Co 2p spectra of Co-doped FVO; (b) Mn 2p spectra of Mn-doped FVO; (c) Ni 2p spectra of Ni-doped FVO; and (d) Zn 2p spectra of Zn-doped FVO.
Figure 4. (a) Co 2p spectra of Co-doped FVO; (b) Mn 2p spectra of Mn-doped FVO; (c) Ni 2p spectra of Ni-doped FVO; and (d) Zn 2p spectra of Zn-doped FVO.
Nanomaterials 14 01765 g004
Figure 5. (a) CV curves at scan rate 2 mVs−1 in voltage window 0.0–0.4 V; (b) galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles measured at 0.5 Ag−1 in voltage window 0.0–0.35 V; (c) rate capability; and (d) cycle performances measured at current density 5 Ag−1; of all electrodes.
Figure 5. (a) CV curves at scan rate 2 mVs−1 in voltage window 0.0–0.4 V; (b) galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles measured at 0.5 Ag−1 in voltage window 0.0–0.35 V; (c) rate capability; and (d) cycle performances measured at current density 5 Ag−1; of all electrodes.
Nanomaterials 14 01765 g005
Figure 6. (a) Plot of log (v) vs. log (i) (b-value determination), and (b) plot of i/v1/2 vs. v1/2 of all electrodes compared. (c) Contribution ratio of surface-controlled process to the capacitance at various scan rates, and (d) the contribution ratio of the surface-controlled process to the capacitance at a scan rate of 20 mVs−1 for the Mn-doped FVO electrode.
Figure 6. (a) Plot of log (v) vs. log (i) (b-value determination), and (b) plot of i/v1/2 vs. v1/2 of all electrodes compared. (c) Contribution ratio of surface-controlled process to the capacitance at various scan rates, and (d) the contribution ratio of the surface-controlled process to the capacitance at a scan rate of 20 mVs−1 for the Mn-doped FVO electrode.
Nanomaterials 14 01765 g006
Table 1. Degree of deviation of Fe and V for various transition metal dopants.
Table 1. Degree of deviation of Fe and V for various transition metal dopants.
Degree of DeviationCo2+Mn2+Ni2+Zn2+
DFe−0.0061−0.01440.08140.1340
DV−0.1668−0.1714−0.0857−0.0335
Table 2. XRD results of undoped and doped samples.
Table 2. XRD results of undoped and doped samples.
SamplePeak Positiond-SpacingFWHMCrystallite Size
FVO8.40310.5140.667126.129
Co8.30510.6380.776108.324
Mn8.22410.7431.91643.878
Ni8.28810.6590.726115.873
Zn8.32910.6070.820102.595
Table 3. Specific surface area of undoped and doped FVO samples.
Table 3. Specific surface area of undoped and doped FVO samples.
SampleFVOCoMnNiZn
Specific surface area (m2g−1)40.1356.7088.7187.9666.69
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amedzo-Adore, M.; Han, J.I. Transition Metal-Doped Layered Iron Vanadate (FeV3-xMxO9.2.6H2O, M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) for Enhanced Energy Storage Properties. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211765

AMA Style

Amedzo-Adore M, Han JI. Transition Metal-Doped Layered Iron Vanadate (FeV3-xMxO9.2.6H2O, M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) for Enhanced Energy Storage Properties. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(21):1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211765

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amedzo-Adore, Mawuse, and Jeong In Han. 2024. "Transition Metal-Doped Layered Iron Vanadate (FeV3-xMxO9.2.6H2O, M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) for Enhanced Energy Storage Properties" Nanomaterials 14, no. 21: 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211765

APA Style

Amedzo-Adore, M., & Han, J. I. (2024). Transition Metal-Doped Layered Iron Vanadate (FeV3-xMxO9.2.6H2O, M = Co, Mn, Ni, and Zn) for Enhanced Energy Storage Properties. Nanomaterials, 14(21), 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211765

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop