Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Black Phosphorus: Critical Review and Potential for Water Splitting Photocatalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Cellular Interactions and Formation of an Epithelial “Nanocoating-Like Barrier” with Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silver Nanoparticle-Embedded Thin Silica-Coated Graphene Oxide as an SERS Substrate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 6
Issue 11
10.3390/nano6110193
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Optoelectronics Based on van der Waals Heterostructures

by
Jae Yoon Lee
1,
Jun-Hwan Shin
1,
Gwan-Hyoung Lee
2,* and
Chul-Ho Lee
1,*
1
KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2016, 6(11), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6110193
Submission received: 7 September 2016 / Revised: 17 October 2016 / Accepted: 18 October 2016 / Published: 27 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2D Nanomaterials: Graphene and Beyond Graphene)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) and black phosphorous have drawn tremendous attention as an emerging optical material due to their unique and remarkable optical properties. In addition, the ability to create the atomically-controlled van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures enables realizing novel optoelectronic devices that are distinct from conventional bulk counterparts. In this short review, we first present the atomic and electronic structures of 2D semiconducting TMDCs and their exceptional optical properties, and further discuss the fabrication and distinctive features of vdW heterostructures assembled from different kinds of 2D materials with various physical properties. We then focus on reviewing the recent progress on the fabrication of 2D semiconductor optoelectronic devices based on vdW heterostructures including photodetectors, solar cells, and light-emitting devices. Finally, we highlight the perspectives and challenges of optoelectronics based on 2D semiconductor heterostructures.

1. Introduction

Inspired by the great success of graphene, the emerging research on a new class of atomically thin two-dimensional (2D) materials with diverse physical properties has become compelling in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Although graphene has remarkable electronic, thermal and mechanical properties [18,19,20,21,22], due to its zero bandgap, it possesses an inherent limitation for applications in various electronic and optoelectronic devices. Therefore, very recently, many researchers have paid significant attention to other 2D materials that have finite bandgap energies [23,24,25].
In fact, in the realm of nature, there are a large number of 2D materials including the graphene family, metal chalcogenides and metal oxides [5,6,26,27,28]. These materials can cover a broad range of electrical and optical properties, as shown in Figure 1a,b [27]. For the 2D semiconductors, first of all, a variety of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) including group IV (Mo and W) dichalcogenides are available. Since semiconducting TMDCs have sizable bandgap, unlike graphene, they have been exploited for electronic devices including field-effect transistors (FETs) and memories [29,30,31,32]. They are also promising optical materials whose energy spectrum is ranged from visible to near infrared wavelength [13,14,15]. More interestingly, these atomically thin 2D semiconductors have exceptional optical properties including the indirect-to-direct bandgap transition at the monolayer regime [23,33], rich spin-valley interplays [34,35,36], strong light–matter interactions [37,38,39], and large exciton bind energy [33,40,41,42,43], which will be further discussed in the following section. As well as semiconducting TMDCs, very recently, black phosphorous has emerged as a new 2D semiconductor [25,44]. Distinctively, it has a tunable direct bandgap, largely varying from 0.3 eV to ~2.0 eV with reducing the thickness [45,46]. For the large bandgap insulators, a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) with the bandgap of ~6 eV is the most famous these days [3]. Because the h-BN has atomically flat and smooth surface with lack of dangling bonds, it has been successfully used as an ideal substrate for other 2D conducting channels such as graphene and TMDCs [47,48,49]. In addition to h-BN, 2D metal oxide nanosheets with various compositions have been investigated as a high-k dielectric layer. Lastly, for the 2D metals, numerous metallic TMDCs including group V compounds are also available as well as graphene [4]. Table 1 summarizes currently available 2D materials that are electrically metallic, semiconducting and insulating.
The availability of 2D materials with various compositions and electronic structures enables one to stack these layers with atomic precision and to produce artificial van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures that are essentially different from conventional material heterostructures as further discussed in the Section 3 [50,51,52,53]. Such ability offers an exciting opportunity in new materials design for fundamental studies and device applications [7,8,9,10]. In particular, as shown in Figure 1c, because semiconducting TMDCs have different band gap energies and work functions, it is possible to build atomically thin semiconductor heterojunctions and/or superlattices with designed band alignment [26,27,28]. That enables investigating the unexplored optical and optoelectronic properties in an ultimate 2D limit, and also leads to novel device concepts and technologies for the next-generation optoelectronics. In this article, we mainly review the unique characteristics of 2D semiconductors including the electronic band structures and optical properties and highlight the recent progresses on the fabrication of novel optoelectronic devices based on 2D semiconductor vdW heterostructures.

2. Transition Metal Dichalcogenides as 2D Semiconductors

Among numerous layered materials, TMDCs as an atomically thin 2D semiconductor have recently attracted considerable interest for potential applications in diverse electronic and optoelectronic devices [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. TMDCs are compound semiconductors with composition of MX2, where M is the transition metal atoms from groups IV to VII elements in the periodic table and X is the chalcogen atoms such as S, Se and Te [4]. Unlike the one-atom-thick graphene, as shown in Figure 2a, a TMDC is three-atom-thick, in which the covalently-bonded atomic plane of transition metals is sandwiched between two atomic planes of chalcogen atoms [29]. Each monolayer is held together by weak vdW forces in the out-of-plane direction, forming a layered structure. As mentioned above, a variety of TMDCs are available, whose electrical properties are either metallic or semiconducting depending on the constituent transition metal atoms [4]. Even among semiconducting TMDCs, the electromagnetic spectrum is widely ranged from visible to infrared wavelength range [27].
Semiconducting TMDCs have a variety of polymorphs depending on atomic arrangement of chalcogen atoms. For example, MoS2, one of the most famous group VI TMDCs, has two polymorphs of 1T and 2H phases (Figure 2b) [4]. 1T-MoS2 has tetragonal symmetry with octahedral (Oh) coordination, whereas 2H-MoS2 has a hexagonal crystal structure with trigonal prismatic (D3h) coordination. Due to this structural difference, they have completely different electronic band structures: 1T-MoS2 is metallic and 2H-MoS2 is semiconducting with sizable bandgap. Nevertheless, a 2H semiconducting TMDC has been widely studied since it is more thermodynamically stable than a 1T metallic phase. Recently, Kappera et al. reported the 1T metallic phase formed by local phase transition only at the contact area can be utilized to reduce the contact resistance of FETs with the 2H MoS2 channel [54].
As well as the atomic structure, semiconducting TMDCs have distinctive and remarkable optical properties compared with conventional bulk semiconductors. It is well known that TMDCs exhibit the unusual transition of the electronic band structure from indirect to direct bandgap when thinning down to the monolayer [23,33]. In the electronic band structure shown in Figure 2c, since the states at Γ-point have a strong p-orbital character of anion X, they shift upward due to interlayer orbital interaction in the case of multilayer TMDCs. Whereas, the states at K-point that have a d-orbital character of cation M are dominantly localized in the X-M-X structure and marginally affected by the number of layers [4,33]. These detailed origins of electronic band structures lead to evolution of an indirect bandgap transition when the TMDC become thicker than bilayer [55].
Because of such an extraordinary change of the band structure, the photoluminescence (PL) characteristics of monolayer TMDCs can be drastically enhanced [23,56]. In spite of much increased PL intensity, the absolute quantum efficiency was still quite low due to non-radiative recombination processes mainly mediated by defect sites such as vacancies and impurities [56,57,58,59,60,61]. In case of the monolayer MoS2 exfoliated from single crystals, the PL quantum yield was reported in the range of 0.01%–0.6% [23,58,59]. To overcome such an issue, there have been many attempts including thermal annealing and chemical treatments [60,61], which can suppress the defect–mediated and/or Auger non-radiative recombination processes. As shown in Figure 2e,f, Amani et al. at University of California at Berkley have recently demonstrated that the PL quantum yield can be drastically increased near unity (~95%) by simply dipping the monolayer MoS2 into an organic-based superacid (Bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide, TFSI) solution [62,63]. They suggested that the organic acid can compensate defect sites such as adatoms and impurities and can passivate sulfur vacancies, leading to significant enhancement of PL quantum yield and minority carrier lifetime by more than two orders of magnitudes. These results offer an important breakthrough in utilizing TMDCs as an optically active material for many optoelectronic devices, particularly for light-emitting devices.
Semiconducting TMDCs have strong light–matter interaction due to band nesting and van Hove singularities in the density of states, resulting in considerable amount of light absorption particularly in the visible wavelength range [37,64]. Many optical spectroscopic studies have revealed that the monolayer TMDCs including MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2 can absorb up to 5%–10% of incident visible light despite its atomic thickness (less than ~1 nm), which is about one order of magnitude higher than that of traditional semiconductors such as GaAs and Si assuming the same thickness [65,66]. Furthermore, atomically thin 2D semiconductors have extremely large exciton energy, which is orders of magnitude larger than those of conventional inorganic semiconductors due to the quantum confinement effect and reduced dielectric screening. Previous theoretical calculations predict that the exciton binding energies of monolayer group VI TMDCs is in the range of 0.3–1.0 eV [33,40,41,42,43]. Ugeda et al. experimentally determined the exciton binding energy of MoSe2 on graphene to be 0.55 eV by means of scanning tunneling spectroscopy and PL spectroscopy [42]. Chernikov et al. also reported that WS2 has the exciton binding energy of 0.32 eV [43]. Due to extreme quantum confinement, in addition, the tightly-bound trions, a three-body quasiparticle composed of an exciton (an electron–hole pair) and a charge carrier (an electron or a hole), have been observed in the monolayer TMDCs even at room temperature [67]. Such a large excitonic effect and strong light–matter interaction of atomically thin 2D semiconductors make them promising for the fabrication of high-performance ultrathin optoelectronic devices [13,14,37]. Furthermore, TMDCs can offer additional advantages for next-generation optoelectronics due to their optical transparency, mechanical flexibility and non-epitaxial fabrication on arbitrary substrates [13,68].

3. Van der Waals Heterostructures Built from Various 2D Materials

3.1. Features of 2D van der Waals Heterostructures

The common feature of 2D layered materials is that the covalently-bonded atomic layers are held together by weak vdW interaction. Because of that, a large number of 2D atomic crystals could be mechanically exfoliated from bulk single crystals. More interestingly, because there are no physical bonds between the layers, it is possible to mechanically stack arbitrary 2D materials together without atomically precise commensurability just as assembling the atomic-scale lego blocks (Figure 3a) [51]. This offers a lot of merits and degrees of freedom in fabricating the heterostructures based on 2D materials [69]. In principle, a variety of different layered constituents enable one to build functional 2D heterostructures with countless combinations, whose heterointerfaces can offer completely different types of 2D electronic systems. Furthermore, 2D vdW heterostructures are essentially distinct from conventional covalently- or ionically-bonded three-dimensional (3D) materials in the way that a vdW surface with free of dangling bonds allows us to create high-quality interfaces [51,52]. As shown in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of Figure 3b, the atomically abrupt and chemically clean interfaces can be easily achieved between different 2D materials [70]. Generally, in conventional 3D bulk materials, the fabrication of high-quality heterostructures is strictly limited by material mismatches in crystal structures, lattice constants and thermal expansion coefficients. In addition, it requires the advanced growth techniques such as molecular beam epitaxy and metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (CVD).
The capability to build atomically controlled heterostructures enables to investigate the intrinsic materials properties and unexplored physical phenomena in an ultimate 2D limit. For example, high mobility approaching to theoretical values has been reported from both graphene and MoS2 sitting on the h-BN dielectric layer [47,48,49]. Exotic physical phenomena such as fractional quantum Hall effect, resonant tunneling and Coulomb drag have been explored in the graphene/h-BN heterostructures [71,72,73,74,75]. As well as fundamental studies, the novel device concepts based on 2D vdW heterostructures have been proposed for a variety of electronic and optoelectronic device applications including field-effect tunneling transistors [76,77], charge trapping memories [31,32], ultrafast photodetectors [78,79,80], and 2D light-emitting didoes (LEDs) [81,82,83].
In addition to experimental efforts, it is very important to develop accurate and effective theoretical approaches for modeling the electronic band structures and physical properties of 2D vdW heterostructures [26,84,85]. Therefore, many researchers have studied the electronic structure and optical properties of a variety of 2D vdW heterostructures using first principles calculations although there are certain limitations such as huge amount of calculation and incongruity of incommensurate interfaces [33,86,87,88]. For example, the interlayer interaction and band structures in commensurate bilayer TMDC heterojunctions have been investigated [41,89]. In addition, Bernardi et al. computed the light absorption of individual TMDC monolayers and predicted the performance of TMDC heterojunction solar cells using the combined density functional theory and GW-Bethe Salpeter equations [65]. Recently, using a multiscale approach, Andersen et al. have successfully calculated the dielectric properties of incommensurate vdW heterostructures comprising hundreds of layers [90].

3.2. Fabrication of 2D van der Waals Heterostructures

For the vdW assembly of numerous 2D materials in the out-of-plane direction, there are mainly two skillful techniques based on direct mechanical exfoliation, transfer, and stacking methods, enabling the fabrication of a variety of vdW heterostructures. Figure 4 shows the schematic illustrations of two representative methods developed by researchers at Columbia University [50,91]. One method is to put one of materials onto the other 2D materials or substrates by using an elastomer stamp combined with an adhesive polymer supporting layer [50]. As shown in Figure 4a, one of 2D crystals is exfoliated onto the polymer layers consisting of the supporting polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) layer and the water-soluble sacrificial layer coated on the SiO2/Si substrate. Then, by dissolving water-soluble layer, the PMMA layer with the exfoliated flake is floated on the de-ionized water. The floated PMMA layer is lifted up with the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp attached on the transparent glass. After precise alignment using a micromanipulator, the 2D crystal is transferred onto the other crystal separately exfoliated on the SiO2/Si substrate by melting down the PMMA layer on a heating stage. After that, PMMA is removed by soaking in acetone. These processes can be applied to both the mechanically-exfoliated samples from bulk single crystals and CVD-grown 2D materials. Although this method is quite useful and successful for fabricating the heterojunction between the two layers, it has an inherent drawback for creating the multilayer heterostructures due to the imperfect cleanliness of residual polymers at the interfaces. That limits to realize the various combination of multilayer stacking while maintaining the atomically sharp interfaces. The second method is developed to avoid interface contamination by polymer residues during transfer processes [91]. A 2D crystal that was put on an adhesive polymer stamp is used to pick up another 2D material through vdW attraction acting on each other. As shown in Figure 4b, the atomically flat 2D material such as h-BN placed on the polypropylene carbonate (PPC)/PDMS structure is brought into contact with the graphene layer, then the stamp layer (h-BN) picks up the target layer (graphene) from the SiO2/Si substrate. By repeating this process several times, one can make multiple-layered assemblies with precisely controlled sequences and atomically sharp interfaces among the neighboring layers.
The above-mentioned methods based on mechanical exfoliation, transfer and stacking have been widely used for fundamental studies to investigate the intrinsic materials properties and exotic physical phenomena in a variety of novel 2D vdW heterostructures. However, these stacking methods have critical drawbacks for practical applications including difficulty in large-area scaling, time-consuming processes and low production yield. Using the large-scale CVD methods, thus, the direct growth methods of vertical (out-of-plane) and lateral (in-plane) heterostructures have recently been demonstrated [92,93,94,95,96]. Especially, epitaxially-grown vertical heterostructures, in contrast to mechanically-stacked heterostructures with the randomly-twisted angles, have the specific relationship of crystallographic orientations between the constituent monolayers [38,97]. Although CVD-grown 2D materials can also be utilized to compose the mechanically-stacked vdW heterostructures, for large-area optoelectronic applications, it is still required to develop reliable and scalable growth techniques for preparing high-quality 2D materials and their heterostructures with precisely controlled compositions, atomically clean and sharp interfaces.

4. Optoelectronic Devices Based on 2D Semiconductor Heterostructures

As discussed above, a large number of 2D semiconductors with variable bandgap and work function are available in the realm of nature. They also have unique and excellent optical properties including the indirect-to-direct bandgap transition at the monolayer regime, strong light–matter interaction and large exciton binding energy. Combining with the ability to create the artificial 2D vdW heterostructures, it is possible to design the novel 2D optoelectronic devices such as photodetectors, solar cells, LEDs and laser [37,80,81,82,83,98,99,100,101,102,103]. As earlier works, the lateral p-n junctions have been reported by several research groups through spatially-split electrostatic gating in a single TMDC channel, demonstrating the optoelectronic functions such as solar-energy harvesting and visible-light emitting [104,105,106,107,108,109]. However, we here focus on presenting the recent progresses on 2D semiconductor optoelectronic devices based on vertically-assembled vdW heterostructures.

4.1. Photodetection and Photovoltaic Devices

4.1.1. Photodetection Based on Graphene/TMDC/Graphene Heterostructures

As a pioneering work, in 2013, Britnell and colleagues at Manchester University reported the 2D photodetectors utilizing a vertical vdW heterostructure composed of semiconducting TMDCs such as WS2 and MoS2 as absorption layers sandwiched between metallic graphene layers [37]. Using the typical mechanical transfer and stacking methods, as shown in Figure 5a, they realized the photoresponsive device consisting of the graphene/TMDC/graphene stack where graphene that is optically transparent, electrically conducting and electrostatically tunable was employed as the top and bottom electrodes. Fermi levels of the two graphene electrodes can be positioned differently by electrostatic doping with the gate voltage, creating the built-in potential gradient within the TMDC layer across the top and bottom graphene electrodes (Figure 5b). That makes it possible to dissociate the electron–hole pairs excited in the TMDC layer by incident light, generating the photocurrent. In this structure, because the Fermi level of the bottom graphene is effectively modulated by electric field effect, the device showed the tunable electrical and photoresponse characteristics upon varying the gate voltage (Figure 5c). In addition, the absolute light absorption of the device can be further increased by simply using multilayer TMDCs and additionally utilizing the plasmonic effect of metal nanostructures deposited on the top surface [37,110]. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the device is achieved above 30% [37]. Similarly, the highly gate-tunable photoresponse characteristics in various graphene/TMDC/graphene heterostructures were reported by the researchers at University of California at Los Angeles [98].
Another strength of vertical vdW heterostructures is that it enables the high-speed photodetection at the picosecond scale and further improvement of quantum efficiency owing to extremely short transport length of charge carriers (or excitons) within atomically thin active layers. Recently, Massicotte et al. have demonstrated that the optimum photoresponse time can be as short as 5.5 picoseconds and the EQE reaches up to 7.3% from the h-BN-encapsulated graphene/WSe2/graphene heterostructure by using time-resolved photocurrent (two-pulse correlation) measurements [80]. The ultrafast photoresponse was also tunable depending on the applied gate voltage and the thickness of TMDC layers. By reducing the channel length, one could achieve the enhanced internal quantum efficiency as well as faster photoresponse time because of shortening of carrier extraction time relative to carrier recombination lifetime.

4.1.2. Atomically Thin p-n Heterojunctions Based on Semiconducting TMDCs

As well as a single TMDC layer, the TMDC heterojunctions can be employed as optically active layers in various photoconversion devices. A p-n junction would be the simplest one that has been widely used as a fundamental unit for various semiconductor optoelectronic devices such as photodetectors, solar cells, and LEDs [81,99,100,101,102].
Recently, the researchers at Columbia University reported the fabrication of atomically thin p-n heterojunctions with two different device geometries and thoroughly investigated their optical and optoelectrical characteristics [99]. As shown in Figure 6a, they fabricated the heterojunction by vertical staking of the n-type MoS2 monolayer and p-type WSe2 monolayer, resulting in a p-n heterojunction with the type-II band alignment. The device laterally contacted with metal electrodes exhibited the gate-tunable diode behaviors. In addition, the photovoltaic responses mostly originated from the heterojunction area were observed in an atomically thin p-n junction (Figure 6b,c). Although the junction seems to exhibit very similar device characteristics compared with those of conventional bulk p-n junctions, authors found that the underlying operation principle of the device is completely different from that of bulk counterparts due to absence of the extended depletion region and carrier diffusion in an atomically thin p-n junction. Despite large exciton binding energy at room temperature, the electron–hole pairs generated in each material can be separated easily by strong internal electric field formed at the type-II heterointerface, which is also confirmed by strong PL quenching resulted from charge transfer. In addition, the ultrafast charge transfer might be expected across the atomically thin heterojunction because diffusion of excitons (or minority carriers) is not required. As the separated experimental results, Hong et al. at University of California at Berkeley reported that charge transfer occurs at a very fast rate of ~50 femtoseconds in the MoS2/WS2 heterostructure with the similar type-II band alignment [78].
Even after efficient and fast charge separation, the electrons and holes can recombine each other again through interlayer recombination processes through quantum tunneling because the separated carriers are still confined spatially within adjacent 2D atomic planes. This interlayer tunneling is understood by two physical mechanisms: (1) Langevin recombination driven by Coulomb interaction; and/or (2) Shockley–Read–Hall recombination mediated by trap states present in the middle of the bandgap. The researchers at Columbia University have proved that the electrical and photoresponse characteristics in an atomically thin p-n junction are determined by interlayer tunneling recombination instead of drift and diffusion of carriers in a bulk junction. Table 2 summarizes the remarkable differences between atomically thin and bulk p-n junctions in terms of the band structure and underlying physical principle.
The interlayer-tunneling-mediated recombination process that is prohibited in a bulk p-n junction decreases the quantum efficiency of the photon-to-electron conversion. To resolve such an issue, as shown in Figure 7a, they proposed the all-2D-vdW heterostructure consisting of the graphene/MoS2/WSe2/graphene stack, where graphene layers are used as electrodes for charge collection. In this geometry, as well as the dissociation of excitons at the semiconductor interface, the extraction of carriers at the graphene/TMDC interface occurs very quickly through quantum tunneling. This suppresses the recombination processes after the separation of excitons so that it can enhance the overall photoconversion efficiency. These results suggest that the vertical all-2D-vdW heterostructures can be exploited to realize the high-efficiency photovoltaic devices and ultrafast photodetectors.
Although the graphene-sandwiched p-n heterostructure can be utilized as a photodetector, it may not be suitable for applications in solar cells because it cannot sustain the photovoltage across the top and bottom graphene electrodes due to direct tunneling current between them. By simply increasing the total thickness of the p-n junction to reduce the tunneling current, the typical photovoltaic property with finite values of short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage was restored (Figure 7b). Furthermore, as shown in Figure 7c, the 20-nm-thick p-n junction device exhibits the EQE above 30%. These experimental results suggest that the TMDC heterojunctions with clean vdW interfaces can be useful for solar cells even if the TMDC is not monolayer. For the practical applications, however, it is required not only to optimize the power conversion efficiency by considering both light adsorption and diffusion length of excitons (or minority carriers), but also to develop the strategies for the large-scale growth and fabrication. Furthermore, the power conversion efficiency can be further improved by increasing the light adsorption using surface plasmon resonance effect or designing of the layered tandem structures using various 2D semiconductors with different band gap energies.

4.2. Light-Emitting Devices

2D semiconductors such as TMDCs and black phosphorous have several useful properties for light emission as well as light absorption. As previously mentioned, in particular, the monolayer TMDCs are direct bandgap semiconductors. Black phosphorous is also a direct bandgap material regardless of the thickness [45,46]. In general, it is very important to have the direct bandgap semiconductors for realizing high-efficiency light-emitting devices because the direct bandgap transition have much higher quantum efficiency than the indirect transition that requires the additional phonon energy to conserve the momentum. In addition, the large exciton binding energy of these materials can lead to enhancement of radiative recombination rate. These unique properties of 2D semiconductors may allow one to fabricate ultrathin 2D light emitters with high efficiency.
Light-emitting device based on 2D semiconductor heterostructures has been first reported in the aforementioned p-WSe2/n-MoS2 heterojunction [81]. Cheng et al. observed the electroluminescence (EL) occurred by hot electrons or recombination of electrons and holes injected in each layer depending on the applied voltages. Furthermore, the monolayer device exhibited stronger EL than the multilayer one. However, the observed EL has relatively low quantum yield because the ultrafast and efficient charge transfer rather than carrier confinement takes place in the type-II heterointerface. Besides, the type-II transition at the vertically-stacked p-n junction with randomly-twisted angles may lead to low quantum yield of radiative recombination due to the momentum mismatch between electrons (conduction band of MoS2) and holes (valence band of WSe2).
To achieve the high luminescence efficiency, the injected charge carriers should be confined effectively within the emitting layer. In case of traditional compound semiconductor LEDs, the bandgap-engineered multiple quantum wells (MQWs) have been employed in the emission region between n-type and p-type injection layers [111]. Recently, the researchers at Manchester University proposed a similar strategy with 2D vdW heterostructures by bandgap engineering [82]. As shown in Figure 8, they fabricated 2D light-emitting devices composed of graphene/h-BN/monolayer TMDC/h-BN/graphene heterostructures. In this device, the atomic-scale single quantum well was built by using the h-BN as a barrier and the monolayer TMDC as an emitting layer. Furthermore, the metallic graphene layers were employed as electron and hole injection layers. Then, the electrically injected electrons and holes in the monolayer TMDC sandwiched between the large bandgap h-BN layers can radiatively recombine well each other due to effective carrier confinement. Furthermore, by repeating the h-BN/TMDC/h-BN structure several times, they managed to fabricate the MQWs or superlattice structures. The device with MQWs exhibited the external quantum yield of ~10%, which is comparable to that of the organic LEDs [82].
In order to realize high-efficiency LEDs, the monolayer TMDCs should be used as an emitting layer. In addition, the emission wavelength is mostly limited in the visible range which corresponds to bandgap energy of TMDCs. Due to its thickness-independent direct bandgap and widely tunable bandgap of 0.3–2 eV, black phosphorous has been suggested as an alternative luminescent material for 2D LEDs particularly in the mid-infrared range. In the proposed device geometry illustrated in Figure 9, the black phosphorous layer that has a narrow bandgap is sandwiched between the electron-injecting MoS2 and hole-injecting WSe2 layers that have larger bandgap than black phosphorous, enabling both efficient injection and confinement of charge carriers [27].
These results suggest that the bandgap-engineered 2D vdW heterostructures can be applied to high-efficiency 2D planar light-emitting devices. Furthermore, in contrast to the conventional compound semiconductor LEDs based on epitaxy, it is possible to manufacture the light emitters on a variety of non-epitaxial substrates including glass, plastic, metal and silicon, which can offer significant opportunities for emerging applications in smart windows, flexible displays and optoelectronic circuits.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

In this short review, we presented the latest research progresses on the fabrication of 2D semiconductor vdW heterostructures and their optoelectronic device applications including light-harvesting and light-emitting devices. Owing to the exceptional optical properties of 2D semiconductors and unique capability to create the vdW heterostructures with atomically sharp interfaces, various optoelectronic devices based on 2D semiconductor heterostructures, including ultrafast photodetectors and 2D planar LEDs, have been recently demonstrated. Such rapid advance in this field reflects great potential of 2D semiconductors for emerging optoelectronics. Nevertheless, the current research stays at the level of a proof of concept for various optoelectronic devices. Therefore, it is still required to thoroughly study the underlying operation principles of the newly proposed devices, enabling the realization of high-performance 2D optoelectronic devices superior to the traditional counterparts. Furthermore, in order to move toward practical applications, we should address several critical issues and challenges: (1) development of scalable strategies for large-area materials growth and high-quality fabrication of heterostructures; (2) the controllable engineering of the material properties such as carrier density and bandgap energy; (3) establishment of long-term environmental material stability and device reliability; and (4) search for innovative applications that cannot be realized by conventional semiconductor optoelectronics. Despite many scientific and technological issues at present, if these challenges can be resolved, 2D semiconductors and their vdW heterostructures would offer unprecedented opportunities for applications in next-generation optoelectronic devices with optical transparency, mechanical flexibility, and capability of non-epitaxial integration.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2014R1A1A2055112) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean Government Ministry of Education, TJ Park Science Fellowship of POSCO TJ Park Foundation, KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology Program and Korea University Future Research Grant. Gwan-Hyoung Lee acknowledges the support by the Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2014R1A1A1004632) and the International Research & Development Program (2016K1A3A1A25003573) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean Government Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.

Author Contributions

Jae Yoon Lee and Jun-Hwan Shin contributed equally to this work. Jae Yoon Lee, Jun-Hwan Shin, Gwan-Hyoung Lee and Chul-Ho Lee wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
2DTwo-dimensional
TMDCsTransition metal dichalcogenides
FETsField-effect transistors
h-BNHexagonal boron nitride
vdWvan der Waals
PLPhotoluminescence
3DThree-dimensional
STEMScanning transmission electron microscopy
CVDChemical vapor deposition
LEDsLight-emitting diodes
PMMAPolymethyl methacrylate
PDMSPolydimethylsiloxane
PPCPolypropylene carbonate
EQEExternal quantum efficiency
ELElectroluminescence
MQWsMultiple quantum wells

References

  1. Novoselov, K.; Jiang, D.; Schedin, F.; Booth, T.; Khotkevich, V.; Morozov, S.; Geim, A. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10451–10453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Novoselov, K.S.; Fal’ko, V.I.; Colombo, L.; Gellert, P.R.; Schwab, M.G.; Kim, K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012, 490, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, M.; Liang, T.; Shi, M.; Chen, H. Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3766–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H.S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K.P.; Zhang, H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Osada, M.; Sasaki, T. Two-dimensional dielectric nanosheets: Novel nanoelectronics from nanocrystal building blocks. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 210–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kalantar-zadeh, K.; Ou, J.Z.; Daeneke, T.; Strano, M.S.; Pumera, M.; Gras, S.L. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides in biosystems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5086–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jariwala, D.; Sangwan, V.K.; Lauhon, L.J.; Marks, T.J.; Hersam, M.C. Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1102–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Chiu, M.-H.; Li, L.-J. Emerging energy applications of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Energy 2015, 18, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duan, X.; Wang, C.; Pan, A.; Yu, R.; Duan, X. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides as atomically thin semiconductors: Opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8859–8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Peng, B.; Ang, P.K.; Loh, K.P. Two-dimensional dichalcogenides for light-harvesting applications. Nano Today 2015, 10, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fiori, G.; Bonaccorso, F.; Iannaccone, G.; Palacios, T.; Neumaier, D.; Seabaugh, A.; Banerjee, S.K.; Colombo, L. Electronics based on two-dimensional materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 768–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Akinwande, D.; Petrone, N.; Hone, J. Two-dimensional flexible nanoelectronics. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Q.H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mak, K.F.; Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, Z.; Martinez, A.; Wang, F. Optical modulators with 2D layered materials. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koppens, F.; Mueller, T.; Avouris, P.; Ferrari, A.; Vitiello, M.; Polini, M. Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 780–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Buscema, M.; Island, J.O.; Groenendijk, D.J.; Blanter, S.I.; Steele, G.A.; van der Zant, H.S.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Photocurrent generation with two-dimensional van der Waals semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3691–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Tan, Y.-W.; Stormer, H.L.; Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Novoselov, K.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.; Jiang, D.; Katsnelson, M.; Grigorieva, I.; Dubonos, S.; Firsov, A. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Novoselov, K.S.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Morozov, S.; Stormer, H.; Zeitler, U.; Maan, J.; Boebinger, G.; Kim, P.; Geim, A. Room-temperature quantum Hall effect in graphene. Science 2007, 315, 1379–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mak, K.F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T.F. Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 136805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ganatra, R.; Zhang, Q. Few-layer MoS2: A promising layered semiconductor. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4074–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ling, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, S.; Xia, F.; Dresselhaus, M.S. The renaissance of black phosphorus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4523–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kang, J.; Tongay, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.; Wu, J. Band offsets and heterostructures of two-dimensional semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 012111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Xiao, D.; Dubey, M.; Ramasubramaniam, A. Two-dimensional material nanophotonics. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rasmussen, F.A.; Thygesen, K.S. Computational 2D materials database: Electronic structure of transition-metal dichalcogenides and oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 13169–13183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, I.V.; Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Roy, K.; Padmanabhan, M.; Goswami, S.; Sai, T.P.; Ramalingam, G.; Raghavan, S.; Ghosh, A. Graphene-MoS2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photoresponsive memory devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 826–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Choi, M.S.; Lee, G.-H.; Yu, Y.-J.; Lee, D.-Y.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, P.; Hone, J.; Yoo, W.J. Controlled charge trapping by molybdenum disulphide and graphene in ultrathin heterostructured memory devices. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bertolazzi, S.; Krasnozhon, D.; Kis, A. Nonvolatile memory cells based on MoS2/graphene heterostructures. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3246–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cheiwchanchamnangij, T.; Lambrecht, W.R. Quasiparticle band structure calculation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 205302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mak, K.F.; He, K.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T.F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zeng, H.; Dai, J.; Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; Cui, X. Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 490–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sie, E.J.; McIver, J.W.; Lee, Y.-H.; Fu, L.; Kong, J.; Gedik, N. Valley-selective optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Britnell, L.; Ribeiro, R.; Eckmann, A.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B.; Mishchenko, A.; Kim, Y.-J.; Gorbachev, R.; Georgiou, T.; Morozov, S. Strong light-matter interactions in heterostructures of atomically thin films. Science 2013, 340, 1311–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fang, H.; Battaglia, C.; Carraro, C.; Nemsak, S.; Ozdol, B.; Kang, J.S.; Bechtel, H.A.; Desai, S.B.; Kronast, F.; Unal, A.A.; et al. Strong interlayer coupling in van der Waals heterostructures built from single-layer chalcogenides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6198–6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, X.; Galfsky, T.; Sun, Z.; Xia, F.; Lin, E.-C.; Lee, Y.-H.; Kéna-Cohen, S.; Menon, V.M. Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramasubramaniam, A. Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 115409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Komsa, H.-P.; Krasheninnikov, A.V. Effects of confinement and environment on the electronic structure and exciton binding energy of MoS2 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 241201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ugeda, M.M.; Bradley, A.J.; Shi, S.-F.; Felipe, H.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, D.Y.; Ruan, W.; Mo, S.-K.; Hussain, Z.; Shen, Z.-X.; et al. Giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chernikov, A.; Berkelbach, T.C.; Hill, H.M.; Rigosi, A.; Li, Y.; Aslan, O.B.; Reichman, D.R.; Hybertsen, M.S.; Heinz, T.F. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 076802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, L.; Yu, Y.; Ye, G.J.; Ge, Q.; Ou, X.; Wu, H.; Feng, D.; Chen, X.H.; Zhang, Y. Black phosphorus field-effect transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tran, V.; Soklaski, R.; Liang, Y.; Yang, L. Layer-controlled band gap and anisotropic excitons in few-layer black phosphorus. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 235319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Jia, Y. Rediscovering black phosphorus as an anisotropic layered material for optoelectronics and electronics. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dean, C.R.; Young, A.F.; Meric, I.; Lee, C.; Wang, L.; Sorgenfrei, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K.; et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, G.-H.; Yu, Y.-J.; Cui, X.; Petrone, N.; Lee, C.-H.; Choi, M.S.; Lee, D.-Y.; Lee, C.; Yoo, W.J.; Watanabe, K.; et al. Flexible and transparent MoS2 field-effect transistors on hexagonal boron nitride-graphene heterostructures. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7931–7936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cui, X.; Lee, G.-H.; Kim, Y.D.; Arefe, G.; Huang, P.Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Chenet, D.A.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Ye, F.; et al. Multi-terminal transport measurements of MoS2 using a van der Waals heterostructure device platform. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dean, C.; Young, A.; Wang, L.; Meric, I.; Lee, G.-H.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Shepard, K.; Kim, P.; Hone, J. Graphene based heterostructures. Solid State Commun. 2012, 152, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Geim, A.K.; Grigorieva, I.V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 2013, 499, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Novoselov, K.; Mishchenko, A.; Carvalho, A.; Neto, A.C. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 2016, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, G.-H.; Lee, C.-H.; van der Zande, A.M.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T.F.; Hone, J.; Kim, P. Heterostructures based on inorganic and organic van der Waals systems. APL Mater. 2014, 2, 092511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kappera, R.; Voiry, D.; Yalcin, S.E.; Branch, B.; Gupta, G.; Mohite, A.D.; Chhowalla, M. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 transistors. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Schmidt, H.; Giustiniano, F.; Eda, G. Electronic transport properties of transition metal dichalcogenide field-effect devices: Surface and interface effects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7715–7736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C.-Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Eda, G.; Yamaguchi, H.; Voiry, D.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.; Chhowalla, M. Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Rana, F. Ultrafast dynamics of defect-assisted electron–hole recombination in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2014, 15, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yuan, L.; Huang, L. Exciton dynamics and annihilation in WS2 2D semiconductors. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 7402–7408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mouri, S.; Miyauchi, Y.; Matsuda, K. Tunable photoluminescence of monolayer MoS2 via chemical doping. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5944–5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wei, X.; Yu, Z.; Hu, F.; Cheng, Y.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Xiao, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Shi, Y. Mo-O bond doping and related-defect assisted enhancement of photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 123004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Amani, M.; Lien, D.-H.; Kiriya, D.; Xiao, J.; Azcatl, A.; Noh, J.; Madhvapathy, S.R.; Addou, R.; Santosh, K.; Dubey, M.; et al. Near-unity photoluminescence quantum yield in MoS2. Science 2015, 350, 1065–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Amani, M.; Burke, R.A.; Ji, X.; Zhao, P.; Lien, D.-H.; Taheri, P.; Ahn, G.H.; Kiriya, D.; Ager, J.W.; Yablonovitch, E.; et al. High luminescence efficiency in MoS2 grown by chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 6535–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Carvalho, A.; Ribeiro, R.; Neto, A.C. Band nesting and the optical response of two-dimensional semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 115205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bernardi, M.; Palummo, M.; Grossman, J.C. Extraordinary sunlight absorption and one nanometer thick photovoltaics using two-dimensional monolayer materials. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3664–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Arora, A.; Koperski, M.; Nogajewski, K.; Marcus, J.; Faugeras, C.; Potemski, M. Excitonic resonances in thin films of WSe2: From monolayer to bulk material. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 10421–10429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mak, K.F.; He, K.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.H.; Hone, J.; Heinz, T.F.; Shan, J. Tightly bound trions in monolayer MoS2. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, X.; Xia, F. Van der Waals heterostructures: Stacked 2D materials shed light. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 264–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Roy, T.; Tosun, M.; Kang, J.S.; Sachid, A.B.; Desai, S.B.; Hettick, M.; Hu, C.C.; Javey, A. Field-effect transistors built from all two-dimensional material components. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6259–6264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Haigh, S.; Gholinia, A.; Jalil, R.; Romani, S.; Britnell, L.; Elias, D.; Novoselov, K.; Ponomarenko, L.; Geim, A.; Gorbachev, R. Cross-sectional imaging of individual layers and buried interfaces of graphene-based heterostructures and superlattices. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dean, C.; Young, A.; Cadden-Zimansky, P.; Wang, L.; Ren, H.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Hone, J.; Shepard, K. Multicomponent fractional quantum Hall effect in graphene. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dean, C.; Wang, L.; Maher, P.; Forsythe, C.; Ghahari, F.; Gao, Y.; Katoch, J.; Ishigami, M.; Moon, P.; Koshino, M.; et al. Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moire superlattices. Nature 2013, 497, 598–602. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Britnell, L.; Gorbachev, R.; Geim, A.; Ponomarenko, L.; Mishchenko, A.; Greenaway, M.; Fromhold, T.; Novoselov, K.; Eaves, L. Resonant tunnelling and negative differential conductance in graphene transistors. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lin, Y.-C.; Ghosh, R.K.; Addou, R.; Lu, N.; Eichfeld, S.M.; Zhu, H.; Li, M.-Y.; Peng, X.; Kim, M.J.; Li, L.-J.; et al. Atomically thin resonant tunnel diodes built from synthetic van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gorbachev, R.; Geim, A.; Katsnelson, M.; Novoselov, K.; Tudorovskiy, T.; Grigorieva, I.; MacDonald, A.; Morozov, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T. Strong Coulomb drag and broken symmetry in double-layer graphene. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Britnell, L.; Gorbachev, R.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B.; Schedin, F.; Mishchenko, A.; Georgiou, T.; Katsnelson, M.; Eaves, L.; Morozov, S.; et al. Field-effect tunneling transistor based on vertical graphene heterostructures. Science 2012, 335, 947–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Georgiou, T.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B.D.; Britnell, L.; Gorbachev, R.V.; Morozov, S.V.; Kim, Y.-J.; Gholinia, A.; Haigh, S.J.; Makarovsky, O.; et al. Vertical field-effect transistor based on graphene-WS2 heterostructures for flexible and transparent electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hong, X.; Kim, J.; Shi, S.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, C.; Sun, Y.; Tongay, S.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS2/WS2 heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 682–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Chan, W.; Tiwari, S.; Rana, F. Ultrafast response of monolayer molybdenum disulfide photodetectors. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Massicotte, M.; Schmidt, P.; Vialla, F.; Schädler, K.; Reserbat-Plantey, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Tielrooij, K.; Koppens, F. Picosecond photoresponse in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cheng, R.; Li, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, C.; Yin, A.; Jiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Electroluminescence and photocurrent generation from atomically sharp WSe2/MoS2 heterojunction p-n diodes. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5590–5597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Withers, F.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Mishchenko, A.; Rooney, A.; Gholinia, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Haigh, S.; Geim, A.; Tartakovskii, A.; et al. Light-emitting diodes by band-structure engineering in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Withers, F.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Schwarz, S.; Dufferwiel, S.; Walker, P.; Godde, T.; Rooney, A.P.; Gholinia, A.; Woods, C.; Blake, P.; et al. WSe2 light-emitting tunneling transistors with enhanced brightness at room temperature. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8223–8228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Qian, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Modelling of stacked 2D materials and devices. 2D Mater. 2015, 2, 032003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Terrones, H.; López-Urías, F.; Terrones, M. Novel hetero-layered materials with tunable direct band gaps by sandwiching different metal disulfides and diselenides. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Böker, T.; Severin, R.; Müller, A.; Janowitz, C.; Manzke, R.; Voß, D.; Krüger, P.; Mazur, A.; Pollmann, J. Band structure of MoS2, MoSe2, and α−MoTe2: Angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 235305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jiang, H. Electronic band structures of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides by the GW approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 7664–7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ramasubramaniam, A.; Naveh, D.; Towe, E. Tunable band gaps in bilayer transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 205325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kośmider, K.; Fernández-Rossier, J. Electronic properties of the MoS2-WS2 heterojunction. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 075451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Andersen, K.; Latini, S.; Thygesen, K.S. Dielectric genome of van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 4616–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wang, L.; Meric, I.; Huang, P.; Gao, Q.; Gao, Y.; Tran, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Campos, L.; Muller, D. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 2013, 342, 614–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Shi, Y.; Li, H.; Li, L.-J. Recent advances in controlled synthesis of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides via vapour deposition techniques. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2744–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Duan, X.; Wang, C.; Shaw, J.C.; Cheng, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Wu, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, A.; et al. Lateral epitaxial growth of two-dimensional layered semiconductor heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Huang, C.; Wu, S.; Sanchez, A.M.; Peters, J.J.; Beanland, R.; Ross, J.S.; Rivera, P.; Yao, W.; Cobden, D.H.; Xu, X. Lateral heterojunctions within monolayer MoSe2–WSe2 semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gong, Y.; Lin, J.; Wang, X.; Shi, G.; Lei, S.; Lin, Z.; Zou, X.; Ye, G.; Vajtai, R.; Yakobson, B.I.; et al. Vertical and in-plane heterostructures from WS2/MoS2 monolayers. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yu, J.H.; Lee, H.R.; Hong, S.S.; Kong, D.; Lee, H.-W.; Wang, H.; Xiong, F.; Wang, S.; Cui, Y. Vertical heterostructure of two-dimensional MoS2 and WSe2 with vertically aligned layers. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 1031–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yu, Y.; Hu, S.; Su, L.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y.; Jin, Z.; Purezky, A.A.; Geohegan, D.B.; Kim, K.W.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Equally efficient interlayer exciton relaxation and improved absorption in epitaxial and nonepitaxial MoS2/WS2 heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2014, 15, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yu, W.J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Yin, A.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Highly efficient gate-tunable photocurrent generation in vertical heterostructures of layered materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lee, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Van Der Zande, A.M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T.F.; et al. Atomically thin p-n junctions with van der Waals heterointerfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Zhang, K.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, G.; Li, T.; Wang, S.; Wei, W.; Zhou, X.; Yu, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, P.; et al. Interlayer transition and infrared photodetection in atomically thin type-II MoTe2/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3852–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Furchi, M.M.; Pospischil, A.; Libisch, F.; Burgdorfer, J.; Mueller, T. Photovoltaic effect in an electrically tunable van der Waals heterojunction. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 4785–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Deng, Y.; Luo, Z.; Conrad, N.J.; Liu, H.; Gong, Y.; Najmaei, S.; Ajayan, P.M.; Lou, J.; Xu, X.; Ye, P.D. Black phosphorus–monolayer MoS2 van der waals heterojunction p-n diode. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8292–8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wu, S.; Buckley, S.; Schaibley, J.R.; Feng, L.; Yan, J.; Mandrus, D.G.; Hatami, F.; Yao, W.; Vučković, J.; Majumdar, A. Monolayer semiconductor nanocavity lasers with ultralow thresholds. Nature 2015, 520, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Pospischil, A.; Furchi, M.M.; Mueller, T. Solar-energy conversion and light emission in an atomic monolayer p-n diode. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Baugher, B.W.; Churchill, H.O.; Yang, Y.; Jarillo-Herrero, P. Optoelectronic devices based on electrically tunable p-n diodes in a monolayer dichalcogenide. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ross, J.S.; Klement, P.; Jones, A.M.; Ghimire, N.J.; Yan, J.; Mandrus, D.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Kitamura, K.; Yao, W.; et al. Electrically tunable excitonic light-emitting diodes based on monolayer WSe2 p-n junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Jo, S.; Ubrig, N.; Berger, H.; Kuzmenko, A.B.; Morpurgo, A.F. Mono-and bilayer WS2 light-emitting transistors. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2019–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhang, Y.; Oka, T.; Suzuki, R.; Ye, J.; Iwasa, Y. Electrically switchable chiral light-emitting transistor. Science 2014, 344, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Buscema, M.; Groenendijk, D.J.; Steele, G.A.; van der Zant, H.S.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Photovoltaic effect in few-layer black phosphorus PN junctions defined by local electrostatic gating. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Miao, J.; Hu, W.; Jing, Y.; Luo, W.; Liao, L.; Pan, A.; Wu, S.; Cheng, J.; Chen, X.; Lu, W. Surface plasmon-enhanced photodetection in few layer MoS2 phototransistors with Au nanostructure arrays. Small 2015, 11, 2392–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Schubert, E.F. Light Emitting Diodes, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Energy spectrum of various two-dimensional (2D) materials and their atomic crystal structures [27]; (b) electronic band structures of hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), black phosphorous, and grapheme; and (c) energy level diagrams of the selected semiconducting TMDCs [6]. Reproduced with permission from [6,27]. Copyright Nature, 2014 and Copyright Wiley, 2015, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) Energy spectrum of various two-dimensional (2D) materials and their atomic crystal structures [27]; (b) electronic band structures of hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), black phosphorous, and grapheme; and (c) energy level diagrams of the selected semiconducting TMDCs [6]. Reproduced with permission from [6,27]. Copyright Nature, 2014 and Copyright Wiley, 2015, respectively.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g001
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC), MX2 [29]; (b) atomic arrangement of two structural polymorphs of MoS2 identified as one hexagonal (1H), one tetragonal (1T) [54]; (c) band structures of bulk, bilayer (2L) and monolayer (1L) MoS2 [56]; (d) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra for 1L and 2L MoS2, Inset: quantum yield as a function of the number of layers [23]; (e) PL spectra for as-exfoliated and TFSI-treated MoS2 monolayers, Inset: PL intensity maps for each samples; and (f) power dependence of the quantum yield for as-exfoliated and chemically-treated MoS2 [62]. Reproduced with permission from [29]. Copyright Nature, 2011, [54] Copyright Nature, 2014, [56] Copyright American Chemical Society, 2010, [23] Copyright American Physical Society and [62] Copyright Science, 2015, respectively.
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC), MX2 [29]; (b) atomic arrangement of two structural polymorphs of MoS2 identified as one hexagonal (1H), one tetragonal (1T) [54]; (c) band structures of bulk, bilayer (2L) and monolayer (1L) MoS2 [56]; (d) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra for 1L and 2L MoS2, Inset: quantum yield as a function of the number of layers [23]; (e) PL spectra for as-exfoliated and TFSI-treated MoS2 monolayers, Inset: PL intensity maps for each samples; and (f) power dependence of the quantum yield for as-exfoliated and chemically-treated MoS2 [62]. Reproduced with permission from [29]. Copyright Nature, 2011, [54] Copyright Nature, 2014, [56] Copyright American Chemical Society, 2010, [23] Copyright American Physical Society and [62] Copyright Science, 2015, respectively.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g002
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of 2D vdW heterostructures composed of graphene, h-BN, and TMDCs [51]; and (b) cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of a graphene/h-BN heterostructure. Reproduced with permission from [51,70]. Copyright Nature, 2012.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of 2D vdW heterostructures composed of graphene, h-BN, and TMDCs [51]; and (b) cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of a graphene/h-BN heterostructure. Reproduced with permission from [51,70]. Copyright Nature, 2012.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g003
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g004 550
Figure 4. Representative methods for fabricating 2D vdW heterostructures (i.e., graphene/h-BN stacks). Method 1 is a technique based on the mechanical transfer and staking using a polymer supporting layer [50]. Method 2 is an assembly technique based on the mechanical transfer and pick-up processes [91]. Reproduced with permission from [50]. Copyright Elsevier, 2012 and [91] Copyright Science, 2013, respectively.
Figure 4. Representative methods for fabricating 2D vdW heterostructures (i.e., graphene/h-BN stacks). Method 1 is a technique based on the mechanical transfer and staking using a polymer supporting layer [50]. Method 2 is an assembly technique based on the mechanical transfer and pick-up processes [91]. Reproduced with permission from [50]. Copyright Elsevier, 2012 and [91] Copyright Science, 2013, respectively.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g004
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g005 550
Figure 5. Photodetection device based 2D vdW heterostructure composed of graphene/WS2/graphene: (a) Schematic illustration; (b) band alignment; and (c) photoresponse characteristics as a function of the gate voltages. Reproduced with permission from [37]. Copyright Science, 2013.
Figure 5. Photodetection device based 2D vdW heterostructure composed of graphene/WS2/graphene: (a) Schematic illustration; (b) band alignment; and (c) photoresponse characteristics as a function of the gate voltages. Reproduced with permission from [37]. Copyright Science, 2013.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g005
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g006 550
Figure 6. Gate-tunable photovoltaic response in an atomically thin p-n heterojunction. (a) Schematic diagram of a vdW-stacked MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction device with lateral metal contacts; (b) Optical image of the fabricated device (top) and photocurrent map of the device for Vds = 0 V and 532 nm laser excitation (bottom). The junction area and metal electrodes are indicated by dashed and solid lines, respectively; (c) Photoresponse characteristics at various gate voltages under white-light illumination. Reproduced with permission from [99]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Figure 6. Gate-tunable photovoltaic response in an atomically thin p-n heterojunction. (a) Schematic diagram of a vdW-stacked MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction device with lateral metal contacts; (b) Optical image of the fabricated device (top) and photocurrent map of the device for Vds = 0 V and 532 nm laser excitation (bottom). The junction area and metal electrodes are indicated by dashed and solid lines, respectively; (c) Photoresponse characteristics at various gate voltages under white-light illumination. Reproduced with permission from [99]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g006
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g007 550
Figure 7. Photodetection and/or photovoltaic devices based on the 2D semiconductor heterostructure consisting of graphene/TMDC p-n junction/graphene: (a) schematic illustration of the atomic crystal structure, band alignment, and device geometry; (b) photoresponse characteristics; and (c) the measured external quantum efficiency (EQE) as a function of excitation wavelength for the devices with different thicknesses of the p-n junctions. Reproduced with permission from [99]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Figure 7. Photodetection and/or photovoltaic devices based on the 2D semiconductor heterostructure consisting of graphene/TMDC p-n junction/graphene: (a) schematic illustration of the atomic crystal structure, band alignment, and device geometry; (b) photoresponse characteristics; and (c) the measured external quantum efficiency (EQE) as a function of excitation wavelength for the devices with different thicknesses of the p-n junctions. Reproduced with permission from [99]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g007
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g008 550
Figure 8. Light-emitting devices based on the 2D vdW heterostructure of graphene/h-BN/TMDC/h-BN/graphene: (a) schematic diagram; and (b) band alignment of the heterostructure; and (c) PL and EL spectra, and the EL image (inset) measured from the device. Reproduced with permission from [82]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Figure 8. Light-emitting devices based on the 2D vdW heterostructure of graphene/h-BN/TMDC/h-BN/graphene: (a) schematic diagram; and (b) band alignment of the heterostructure; and (c) PL and EL spectra, and the EL image (inset) measured from the device. Reproduced with permission from [82]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g008
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g009 550
Figure 9. The recently proposed infrared LEDs based on 2D vdW heterostructures using black phosphorous as an emitting layer. Reproduced with permission from [27]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Figure 9. The recently proposed infrared LEDs based on 2D vdW heterostructures using black phosphorous as an emitting layer. Reproduced with permission from [27]. Copyright Nature, 2014.
Nanomaterials 06 00193 g009
Table
Table 1. A variety of 2D materials with different electrical properties.
Table 1. A variety of 2D materials with different electrical properties.
MetalGrapheneGroup V TMDCs (VX2, NbX2, TaX2)TiS2, NiSe2, PdS2, PdSe2, PtS2, PtSe2
SemiconductorGroup VI TMDCs (MoX2, WX2)ReX2, HfX2, ZrX2, TcX2, TiSe2, TiTe2, InSe, In2Se3, GaSe, GaTe, PtTe2Black phosphorous
Insulatorh-BNGraphene oxide 2D oxides (Ti0.87O2, LaNb2O7, (Ca,Sr)2Nb3O10, CaLaNb2TiO10, La2Ti2NbO10, etc)
X = Chalcogen(S or Se or Te).
Table
Table 2. Comparison between the atomically thin p-n junction and the conventional bulk p-n junction.
Table 2. Comparison between the atomically thin p-n junction and the conventional bulk p-n junction.
Atomically thin p-n junctionConventional bulk p-n junction
Nanomaterials 06 00193 i001 Nanomaterials 06 00193 i002
  • No extended depletion region
  • Tunneling-mediated interlayer recombination
  • Ultrafast change transfer (≤1 ps)
  • Depletion region (~a few hundred nm)
  • Diffusion & drift of carriers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.Y.; Shin, J.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Lee, C.-H. Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Optoelectronics Based on van der Waals Heterostructures. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6110193

AMA Style

Lee JY, Shin J-H, Lee G-H, Lee C-H. Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Optoelectronics Based on van der Waals Heterostructures. Nanomaterials. 2016; 6(11):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6110193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jae Yoon, Jun-Hwan Shin, Gwan-Hyoung Lee, and Chul-Ho Lee. 2016. "Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Optoelectronics Based on van der Waals Heterostructures" Nanomaterials 6, no. 11: 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6110193

APA Style

Lee, J. Y., Shin, J. -H., Lee, G. -H., & Lee, C. -H. (2016). Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Optoelectronics Based on van der Waals Heterostructures. Nanomaterials, 6(11), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6110193

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop