Next Article in Journal
Detection of Advanced Glycosylation End Products in the Cornea Based on Molecular Fluorescence and Machine Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Nonenzymatic Electrochemical Glutamate Sensor Using Copper Oxide Nanomaterials and Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes
Previous Article in Journal
A Fluorescent Biosensor for Streptavidin Detection Based on Double-Hairpin DNA-Templated Copper Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
2D Metal-Organic Frameworks: Properties, Synthesis, and Applications in Electrochemical and Optical Biosensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Based Biosensors: From Fundamentals to Healthcare Applications

1
Centre for Nanotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India
2
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(2), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020169
Submission received: 11 December 2022 / Revised: 16 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 21 January 2023

Abstract

:
There has been an exponential surge in reports on two-dimensional (2D) materials ever since the discovery of graphene in 2004. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are a class of 2D materials where weak van der Waals force binds individual covalently bonded X–M–X layers (where M is the transition metal and X is the chalcogen), making layer-controlled synthesis possible. These individual building blocks (single-layer TMDs) transition from indirect to direct band gaps and have fascinating optical and electronic properties. Layer-dependent opto-electrical properties, along with the existence of finite band gaps, make single-layer TMDs superior to the well-known graphene that paves the way for their applications in many areas. Ultra-fast response, high on/off ratio, planar structure, low operational voltage, wafer scale synthesis capabilities, high surface-to-volume ratio, and compatibility with standard fabrication processes makes TMDs ideal candidates to replace conventional semiconductors, such as silicon, etc., in the new-age electrical, electronic, and opto-electronic devices. Besides, TMDs can be potentially utilized in single molecular sensing for early detection of different biomarkers, gas sensors, photodetector, and catalytic applications. The impact of COVID-19 has given rise to an upsurge in demand for biosensors with real-time detection capabilities. TMDs as active or supporting biosensing elements exhibit potential for real-time detection of single biomarkers and, hence, show promise in the development of point-of-care healthcare devices. In this review, we provide a historical survey of 2D TMD-based biosensors for the detection of bio analytes ranging from bacteria, viruses, and whole cells to molecular biomarkers via optical, electronic, and electrochemical sensing mechanisms. Current approaches and the latest developments in the study of healthcare devices using 2D TMDs are discussed. Additionally, this review presents an overview of the challenges in the area and discusses the future perspective of 2D TMDs in the field of biosensing for healthcare devices.

1. Introduction

The discovery of graphene in 2004 set a new benchmark in the two-dimensional (2D) material research and applications [1]. Monolayer graphene was first mechanically exfoliated from graphite flakes and found to have excellent electrical properties. The extraordinary electrical mobility of suspended graphene reported by Bolotin et al. led the scientific community to conduct further studies on graphene for the ultrafast electronics [2]. High carrier mobility in graphene also aids in optical applications, such as photonics and ultrafast photodetection from ultraviolet to terahertz range [3,4,5]. Due to the aforementioned properties, graphene has been an excellent candidate in various applications such as photodetectors, gas sensors, humidity sensors, biosensors, and others [6,7,8,9,10]. The conducting nature of graphene, owing to zero band gap, has fundamental limitations on sensitivity and detection limits in sensing applications [11]. Even though graphene has extremely high electron mobility, the absence of a finite band gap limits its application in field effect transistors (FETs) [12]. Tremendous efforts were made to create a band gap in graphene by chemical doping, AB-stacked bilayer graphene layer, and other approaches, but only a few hundred of meV were achieved [13,14]. The fundamental limitations of graphene and its derivatives led to the search for graphene-like 2D materials with superior properties.
2D materials have the potential for next-generation applications in energy storage, ultrafast electronics, sensing, and others [15,16]. One of the emerging applications of 2D materials lies in the biomedical field, from drug delivery to analyte detection [17,18]. Detection of bioanalytes is a prerequisite for disease diagnosis, progress, and further treatment. Enabled by their high density of surface sites, 2D materials, such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), Mxenes, and graphite carbon nitride (g-C3N4), have tremendous potential as transducer elements in different biosensing applications [18,19,20,21]. 2D TMDs with graphene-like planar structure, high fluorescence (FL) emission and quenching, high carrier mobility, high surface-to-volume ratio, and compatibility with modern fabrication technologies are the most suitable alternatives to the graphene [22,23]. In TMDs, weak van der Waals forces bind individual covalently bonded X–M–X layers (where M is the transition metal and X is the chalcogen), making layer-controlled synthesis possible [24]. Unlike graphene, most TMDs have semiconducting electrical properties and have been studied extensively for their application in future integrated electronic circuits [25,26]. Unique optoelectronic properties arise when multilayer TMDs are reduced to monolayers, and the electronic band structure becomes direct from indirect along with strong photoluminescence (PL) and large exciton binding energy [27,28]. TMDs have been recently explored in several applications ranging from photodetection, light emission, bio-imaging, gas sensing, drug delivery, and others [29,30,31,32,33,34].
A finite band gap semiconducting material is crucial for the development of ultrasensitive optical or electronic biosensors [29,35,36]. The excellent properties of TMDs include tunable band gap, planar structure, high carrier mobility, excellent PL emission and quenching, mechanical flexibility, and high on-off ratio, which has driven the development of sensing applications (see Figure 1) [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. The atomic layer thickness of TMDs helps the adsorption of bioanalytes into the surface, hence yielding a high sensing response [46]. The layer-dependent tunable band structure, biocompatibility, low toxicity, and properties mentioned above make TMDs suitable candidates as transducers for an ultrasensitive sensor. Selectivity is one of the important parameters for any sensing device that determines its ability to detect an analyte in the presence of similar analytes. With advanced synthesis methods and transfer processes, TMD heterostructures with other 2D materials show improved properties suitable for selective detection. Surface modification of TMDs with the help of defect engineering by various methods, such as plasma treatment, thermal annealing, etc., helps in suitable surface functionalization with specific receptors [47]. Other materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNT) and silicon nanowires, also exhibit a similar kind of flexibility, but device fabrication using 1D materials and proper alignment are major challenges [48,49,50]. In contrast, the wafer scale synthesis capabilities of TMDs and their planar structure make them compatible with modern-day fabrication technologies [39,51,52]. Another interesting aspect is that they are mechanically flexible and hence, have the potential to be integrated with next-generation flexible wearable point-of-care (PoC) devices [40,53,54,55]. The increase in the active surface site density increases the probability of binding of analytes to the sites of the sensing transducer elements and hence, causing the modulation of opto-electronic properties, which results in highly sensitive biosensors with improved detection limit [36,56,57]. The surface area per gram (SAPG) of TMDs increases substantially when reduced to a few layers from bulk. MoS2 shows a SAPG value increase from 8.4 to 25 m2 per gram [58]. The higher value of SAPG and low electrical noise will promote lower detection limits. Among all the TMDs, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2 have been studied extensively in terms of synthesis and various applications through fundamental properties. The potential application of other TMD families of materials, such as MoTe2 and WTe2, is yet to be explored.
As pointed out above, the attractive properties of TMD have led to the exploration of future-generation biosensing applications. Depending upon the working principle, the biosensors can be grouped into three categories: (a) Electrical, (b) Electrochemical, and (c) Optical. The detection mechanism of electrical biosensors is simple and end-user-friendly and detects the bioanalytes in real-time. The effect of binding analytes on TMDs surface via receptor is analogous to the applied gate bias in FETs. The electrical detection method transforms the analyte information in the form of current changes [59,60]. There are two working principles for electrochemical-based biosensors. The information about the analytes is obtained by measuring the change in Faraday current or interfacial impedance by reduction or oxidation reaction (redox) in the specifically designed working electrode in the presence of a target analyte [61,62]. The optical detection of bioanalytes is one of the most sensitive and it can even detect single molecules. The optical mechanism includes surface plasmon resonance (SPR), which measures the local refractive index due to adsorptions of the targeted analytes [63,64]. The other optical mechanism is based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), where nonradiative energy is transferred between two fluorophores via a pole–dipole coupling [65]. Zhu et al. found for the first time excellent fluorescence quenching ability of ssDNA in the presence of single-layer MoS2 nanosheets (NS) [66]. The van der Waals interaction between the dye-labeled ssDNA probe and MoS2 nanosheets almost entirely quenched the FL intensity of the probe once it adsorbed on the MoS2 surface. Upon hybridization of the ssDNA with complementary targeted DNA, hybridized dsDNA detached, resulting in restoring FL intensity by the FRET mechanism. The quantitative analysis of the restored FL intensity with the targeted DNA gives information about the concentration and the type of DNA. The specific binding nature of small-size ssDNA with the targeted DNA provides excellent selectivity and ultra-sensitivity.
By changing the probe ssDNA corresponding to different targets, sensing of different DNA as well as other biomarkers can be achieved [67,68,69]. While discussing electrical biosensors, we primarily focus on FETs based biosensors. FETs are present in every digital circuit, in gadgets ranging from computers, mobile phones, various sensors, and others. Thus, FET-based biosensors can be integrated into modern-day electronic circuits for the real-time detection of biomarkers. Recently, Park et al. demonstrated sensitivity enhancement by creating nanopores on the MoS2 surface to detect cortisol with a detection limit of 1 gM/mL in human serum and in an artificial saliva [70]. Details about the various types of biosensors based on TMDs will be discussed shortly. First, the review highlights various synthesis methods of 2D TMD nanostructures and then their application as biosensors based on (a) electrical, (b) electrochemical, and (c) optical mechanisms. Finally, a brief discussion on future prospects will be presented.

2. Synthesis of 2D TMD Materials

The growth/synthesis protocols of 2D TMDs play a significant role in their applications in electronic and optical devices, sensing, drug delivery, etc. A summary of growth methods is given in Figure 2. Top-down and bottom-up are two standard approaches for the synthesis of 2D nanomaterials. Nanomaterials are obtained by breaking down their bulk counterparts in top-down methods, whereas atomic range chemical or physical forces aid in the assembly of basic units in the formation of larger structures in bottom-up methods. Scotch-tape-aided mechanical exfoliation is a top-down method where thin layers of TMDs can be exfoliated from their bulk form. Graphene was first obtained from graphite flakes using scotch tape in 2004 [1]. The same method was later used for MoS2, WS2, MoSe2, and WSe2 as well [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. This method is simple and cost-effective and helps in producing high-quality thin films; however, it suffers from the perspective of repeatability and uniformity over a large area. Thus, mass production for practical applications is not feasible. Other than mechanical exfoliation, liquid-based exfoliation includes chemical as well as physical techniques. For chemical exfoliation, interactions between the bulk material and some chemical agent produces 2D TMDs. Some examples include ion exchange [80,81,82], redox-based [83], surfactant-assisted methods, ion intercalations, electrophoresis, etc. [84]. Physical methods include tip sonication and ultrasonication-assisted exfoliation. Acquiring control over the lateral size and thickness is not straightforward with liquid-based exfoliating methods as in mechanical methods. In addition to these limitations, liquid-based methods leave impurities or by-products and lead to the creation of defects in the final 2D film. These defect sites are used for the bio-functionalization of the receptor for the selective capturing of analytes. Radiofrequency (RF) sputtering has also been used for the controlled deposition of large-area 2D TMDs. The films formed by RF magnetron sputtering consist of defects lacking crystallinity and quality, but thermal annealing was shown to improve the crystalline quality [85,86].
Bottom-up methods include hydrothermal synthesis, electrochemical deposition, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and metal organic CVD or MOCVD. Hydrothermal synthesis of 2D materials is one of the easiest routes for 2D TMDs with low environmental impact and high-efficiency [87,90,91]. This method is very useful for synthesizing hybrid TMD composites with other nanomaterials for better performance [92,93]. The biggest challenge is control over the lateral size and achieving a uniform thickness of the TMD structures. However, the defect sites present in the final 2D TMDs obtained via hydrothermal processes prove useful for surface functionalization and sensing applications [94]. Electrochemical deposition is a highly controlled method for large-area synthesis of TMDs, such as MOS2 and WS2 [95,96]. The large areas of up to a few cm in size of MoS2 films were synthesized by electrochemical deposition by Wun et al. [88]. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has also been used for the thin film deposition of TMDs [97,98,99]. ALD is well known for the uniform deposition of dielectric thin films [100,101]. By varying the cycle number, precursor gases, and substrate temperature, high-quality large-area TMD films have been obtained, which exhibited excellent opto-electronic properties [97,98]. Moreover, ALD is good for the formation of various heterostructures [98]. CVD yields large-area 2D TMD films with controlled lateral size and thickness. CVD-grown films are of the highest quality in terms of crystallinity and uniformity [36,89,102,103,104,105,106]. The basic principle of CVD is that thermal energy is used to induce chemical reactions between precursors in their vapor phases. A carrier gas is used for the deposition of 2D thin films onto suitable substrates. Large-area 2D heterostructures have been synthesized with superior optoelectronic properties using CVD [107,108]. Chubarov et al. have successfully grown monolayer WS2 over 2-inch sapphire substrates with a great uniformity [52]. The monolayer TMDs grown by CVD have shown excellent optoelectronic properties. Das et al. studied 2D TMD FETs extensively for future-generation applications in electronic as well as biomedical devices [25,26,109]. MOCVD is another technique for the synthesis of wafer-scale TMD films [110,111], which uses metal organic precursors. Inkjet printing of 2D TMDs has also been reported [54,112]. The advantages of printing include eliminating the need for conventional high-cost lithography and an overall low-cost process. However, TMD flakes are dissolved in a suitable solvent for ink preparation, which might leave solvent residue in the final device, limiting its overall performance. There are still challenges to the low-cost synthesis of 2D materials with control over their size and thickness. Extensive research is ongoing for the controlled synthesis of TMDs.

3. Biosensing Using 2D TMD Materials

3.1. Electrical Biosensors

Electrical sensors transform the information about the analytes into useful user-readable electrical signals, such as current or resistance change. This section will discuss the historical progress of TMD-based FET biosensors and the current challenges. The basic working principle of FETs is that the current between the source and drain terminals is controlled by a third terminal called the gate. FETs are essential components of any modern-day electronic circuit and have well-established technologies for fabrication. Thus, electrical detection has the potential for integration with various modern-day electronic devices for real-time detection of bioanalytes. The electrical biosensors consist of a semiconductor transducer element along with a bioreceptor connected to the transducer. The bio-analytes interact with the semiconducting transducer element through the receptor and change the transducer’s electrical properties by the charge transfer mechanism. The attachment of bio-analyte to the semiconductor surface is equivalent to a potential bias at the gate terminal and hence, leads to a change in the drain current. The main advantage of FET biosensors is the enhancement of sensitivity and limit of detection (LoD). Table 1 provides a summary of FET-based TMD biosensors, and Figure 3 captures a cross-section of the FET sensors discussed in this review.

3.1.1. Biomarker Detection

Biomarkers are biological markers for a specific medical state that can be observed or measured externally. They are direct outcomes of specific biological, pathogenic, or pharmacological processes [113]. Detection of biomarkers is crucial in disease diagnosis, state of progress, and treatments. Detection at ultralow concentration identifies the disease onset early, leading to a higher chance of treatment and recovery. Two-D TMDs, with their high density of active sites, give ultrasensitive responses and ultralow LoD [63]. For example, cancer is one of the deadliest diseases, and a large number of cancer patients can be treated successfully if detected at an early stage of the disease. According to estimates by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, there will be 18.1 million new cancer cases and 9.6 million cancer-related deaths. Lung cancer is the deadliest, followed by breast and prostate cancer [114].
Figure 3. Electrical field-effect transistor-based biosensors (a) schematic of MoS2 FET for pH and streptavidin sensing. Schematic reprinted with permission from ref. [59]. Copyrights 2014 American Chemical Society; (b) Schematic of WSe2 FET for SARS-CoV sensing, reprinted with permission from ref. [115]. Copyrights 2021 American Chemical Society; (c) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 FET at different concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), reprinted with permission from ref. [57]. Copyright 2014 under Creative Commons; (d) Sensing response of MoS2 FET with and without nanopores for cortisol detections, reprinted with permission from ref. [70]. Copyrights 2022 American Chemical Society; (e) Multi-layer MoS2 FET for PSA sensing, reprinted with permission from ref. [116]. Copyrights 2017 American Chemical Society; (f) DNA detection response of MoS2 FET biosensor, reprinted with permission from ref. [29]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier; (g) Calibration curve of miRNA-155 detection using MoS2 FET, reprinted with permission from ref. [56]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier; (h) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 for the detection of circular protein, reprinted with permission from ref. [117]. Copyrights 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. Electrical field-effect transistor-based biosensors (a) schematic of MoS2 FET for pH and streptavidin sensing. Schematic reprinted with permission from ref. [59]. Copyrights 2014 American Chemical Society; (b) Schematic of WSe2 FET for SARS-CoV sensing, reprinted with permission from ref. [115]. Copyrights 2021 American Chemical Society; (c) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 FET at different concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), reprinted with permission from ref. [57]. Copyright 2014 under Creative Commons; (d) Sensing response of MoS2 FET with and without nanopores for cortisol detections, reprinted with permission from ref. [70]. Copyrights 2022 American Chemical Society; (e) Multi-layer MoS2 FET for PSA sensing, reprinted with permission from ref. [116]. Copyrights 2017 American Chemical Society; (f) DNA detection response of MoS2 FET biosensor, reprinted with permission from ref. [29]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier; (g) Calibration curve of miRNA-155 detection using MoS2 FET, reprinted with permission from ref. [56]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier; (h) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 for the detection of circular protein, reprinted with permission from ref. [117]. Copyrights 2019 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 13 00169 g003
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancer diseases for males, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a well-studied biomarker for prostate cancer [118]. Detection of PSA at low concentrations is highly desirable, and Wang et al. demonstrated biomodifications of multilayer MoS2-based microfluidic FETs for specific detection of PSA. The MoS2 flakes were mechanically exfoliated on a SiO2 substrate and passivated by HfO2 before functionalizing with anti-PSA to have specific interactions. The concentration-dependent analysis shows a sub-pM sensitivity with a detection limit of 375 fM [79]. The specific binding of PSA on the functionalized surface shows no response with bovine serum albumin (BSA), implying the highly selective detection of PSA. An ultra-thin layer of HfO2 helps biofunctionalization and protects the MoS2 layer from direct interaction with the aqueous medium. This study opened a new pathway for MoS2-like materials application in FET-based biosensing. Lee et al. functionalized the MoS2 surface directly by anti-PSA, utilizing the hydrophobic nature of MoS2. The attachment of positively charged anti-PSA antibodies is equivalent to applying a positive bias and hence, modulates the off-state current more significantly. A significant number of electrons was injected into the MoS2 channel once anti-PSA adsorbed on the surface. The direct functionalization of the MoS2 surface enhanced the lower detection limit to 1 pg/mL and reduced the fabrication complexity [57]. Yoo et al. fabricated MoS2 FET on a flexible polyimide substrate integrated with a LED-based readout system for the detection of PSA. This study showed that the MoS2 FET is highly stable under mechanical stress even after 10,000 bending cycles [119]. Park et al. studied the detection of PSA in a dry medium. Anti-PSA was attached to the surface with the help of AuNPs, which enhanced the sensitivity many times. The non-specific response was minimized by integrating blocking agent casein, which improved the selective response, recording a detection limit of 100 fg/mL [116]. Hossain et al. fabricated WSe2-based FET for ultra-low detections of PSA. The biosensor has a linear response with a wide range of concentrations from 10 fg to 1 ng per ml with an exceptional sensitivity [60]. Sensitivity tests in complex biofluids, such as human serum samples, were not verified in the above-mentioned studies. Sensitivity toward biosamples is crucial for real-time PoC devices.
MicroRNAs are common breast cancer biomarkers used for diagnosis [120]. Majd et al. used chemically synthesized MoS2 in a FET to detect miRNA-155 in human serum and breast cancer cell line samples toward PoC devices. The surface was functionalized with amino-modified probe RNAs through physical adsorption, which reduced the channel conductivity. In the presence of targeted RNA, the probe hybridized and detached from the surface, increasing the channel conductivity. A linear response over 0.1 fM to 10 nM was achieved with a detection limit of 0.03 fM at the optimized conditions. The linear response with concentrations of miRNA-21 in human serum is a significant step toward PoC systems [56]. Circulating protein (CP) is essential for diagnosing and treating cancer patients. Park et al. employed scotch-tape-assisted transfer of MoS2 onto an Al2O3-deposited substrate for the FET-based matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) sensor and achieved a detection limit of 1 pM [117]. The same group has also used multilayer MoS2 functionalized with aptamer to detect cortisol in human serum and artificial saliva [70]. Sulfur vacancies aid in the functionalization of the bioreceptor and hence, the sensitivity. Additional sulfur defects by creating the nanopore on the MoS2 surface enhanced the sensitivity exceptionally. The nanopore-modified MoS2 has the lowest detection limit of 1 ag/mL with a wide range of sensitivity from ag/mL to µg/mL.

3.1.2. Detection of Bacteria and Virus

Bacteria and viruses are microorganisms living everywhere, including air, contaminated food, water, body fluids, etc. Some are beneficial to human health, while others are detrimental [121]. Bacterial and viral infections are mostly transferred via physical contact and non-contact spreading. The rapid spreading of these infections causes millions of deaths worldwide [122]. Thus, rapid detection of bacterial and viral infections is vital in human health and environmental monitoring. Detection of bacteria and viruses using TMDs is still in the developing stage. Graphene and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) have been studied in the FET-based detection of bacteria and viruses [123,124,125,126,127]. TMD-based FET biosensors for detecting bacteria and viruses are limited. Moudgil et al. have shown highly selective and sensitive detection of Gram-positive bacteria based on MoS2/TiO2 hybrid nanostructure FET [128]. The TiO2 surface functionalized with vancomycin was able to differentiate between Gram-positive and negative bacteria. A sensitivity of 49% was observed toward S. Aurus with a dynamic response range between 50–106 cfu/mL with a detection limit of 50 cfu/mL. The first WSe2-based FET biosensor for virus detection was reported by Fathi-Hafshejani et al. [115], wherein monolayer WSe2 was functionalized by SARS-CoV-2 antibody 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) for the real-time detection of SARS-CoV-2. Selenium vacancies present in WSe2 help in covalently bonding with MUA. The ability of functionalization of monolayer WSe2 also opened avenues for the usage of other TMDs for different pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The MUA functionalized WSe2 FET was able to detect as low as 25fg/µL in real-time.

3.1.3. Detection of DNAs

Detection of DNA is crucial for disease diagnosis, drug delivery, food quality monitoring, environment monitoring, etc. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most trusted and standard DNA amplification and identification method, but its high cost and time remain a drawback. There is a need for a fast and cost-effective way of DNA sequencing and identification. Lee et al. used chemically synthesized MoS2-based FET sensors for the selective detection of DNA molecules. The van der Walls interaction allows direct functionalization of the MoS2 surface by probe ssDNA. Adsorption of negatively charged ssDNA on the basal plane of MoS2 reduces the effective positive gate voltage, reducing drain current significantly. On adding the targeted DNA, the probe DNA hybridized to dsDNA and detached from the MoS2 surface, increasing its conductivity. At optimum conditions, the sensing device has a highly selective response over 10 fM to 10 nM of complementary DNA [129]. The absence of dangling bonds ensures stability over different pH environments. Mei et al. reported MoS2 based FET sensor for the detection of targeted DNA by using phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligos (PMO) as a probe. The strong interaction between the PMO and targeted DNA improves the detection limit to 6 fM, compared to previous reports. Owing to its low detection limit and ability to detect different concentrations of targeted DNA in human serum, it is a step forward for the PoC diagnostics [29]. Liu et al. used monolayer MoS2 grown by CVD in bio-FETs for the detection of specific DNA targets. Thiol-modified ssDNA probes functionalize the MoS2 surface by using AuNPs through strong Au–SH bonding that enhances the sensitivity by many folds. The monolayer MoS2 can selectively detect 100 aM complementary targeted DNA [36]. Bahri. et al. used WS2 for the first time for the detection of DNA hybridization. The CVD monolayer WS2 was functionalized with an ssDNA probe by van der Walls interaction. The unreacted WS2 surface was blocked by blocking agent poly-C (C-15) to eliminate the non-specific binding for better selectivity. This DNA sensor has an excellent linear response over 0.1 fM to 1 nM DNA concentration with a detection limit of 3 aM [130].
Sarkar et al. fabricated pH and streptavidin sensors based on functionalized MoS2 FET. Lowering the solution pH increases positive ion concentration, which is equivalent to applying positive potential at the gate terminal. The biosensor has a linear response over 3 to 9 pH values and hence serves as a reliable pH sensor. For specific detection of streptavidin, the MoS2 surface was functionalized with biotin. The functionalized MoS2 sensor is highly selective to streptavidin with a detection limit of 100 fM [59]. The semiconducting MoS2 has enhanced the sensitivity by almost 74-fold over graphene. Man et al. fabricated a few layers of MoS2 FET by SF6-assisted plasma etching from bulk MoS2 and passivated it by HfO2. They functionalized the HfO2 by anti-human tumor necrosis factor–alpha (TNF-α) antibody corresponding to the TNF-α biomarker. At the optimum sensing environment, the device showed a linear response over 60 fM to 6 pM concentrations and a detection limit of 60 fM in linear and subthreshold regimes. The statistics over several devices showed an excellent repeatability [131]. Nam et al. compared electrical sensing of TNF-α and Streptavidin using MoS2 and WSe2 FET biosensors [132], and both TMDs exhibited similar detection limits. Chen et al. detected kanamycin (KAN) using an aptamer functionalized MoS2 FET biosensor. The highly specific interaction between the probe aptamer and KAN shows a selective response toward KAN. Surface modification by AuNPs enhances probe attachment and sensitivity [133].
Table 1. Summary of TMD based electrical biosensors.
Table 1. Summary of TMD based electrical biosensors.
MatrixMethodTarget AnalyteLinear RangeLoDReference
Multi-layer MoS2FET basedPSA 375 fM[79]
Multi-layer MoS2FET basedPSA1 pg/mL–10 ng/mL1 pg/mL[57]
Multi-layer MoS2FET basedPSA1 pg/mL–1 ng/mL1 pg/mL[119]
Multi-layer
MoS2
FET basedPSA100 fg/mL–1 ng/mL100 fg/mL[116]
Multi-layer WSe2FET basedPSA10 fg/mL–1 ng/mL10 fg/mL[60]
Multi-layer
MoS2
FET basedmiRNA-1550.1 fM–10 nM0.03 fM[56]
Multi-layer
MoS2
FET basedCirculating protein1 pM–10 nM1 pM[117]
Multi-layer
MoS2
FET basedcortisol1 ag/mL–1 µm/mL1 ag/mL[70]
MoS2/TiO2FET basedS. Aurus50–106 cfu/mL50 cfu/mL[128]
Monolayer WSe2FET basedSARS-CoV-225 fg/µL–10 ng/µL25 fg/µL[115]
Multi-layer
MoS2
FET basedDNA10 fM–10 nM10 fM[129]
Few-layer
MoS2
FET basedDNA10 fM–1 nM6 fM[29]
Monolayer MoS2FET basedDNA100 aM–100 fM100 aM[36]
Monolayer WS2FET basedDNA0.1 fM–1 nM3 aM[130]
Multi-layer
MoS2
FET basedStreptavidin 100 fM[59]
Multi-layer MoS2FET basedTNF-α60 fM–6 pM60 fM[131]
Multi-layer MoS2 and WSe2FET basedTNF-α and Streptavidin60 fM–6 pM and 70 fM–70 pM60 fM and 70 fM[132]
Monolayer-bilayerFET basedkanamycin1 nM–100 µM0.66 nM[133]
MoS2/rGOFET basedH2O21 pM–100 nM1 pM[134]
Reactive oxygen species, such as H2O2, play a vital role in the functioning of cells and neuro systems. Detection of such species is essential for the continuous monitoring of cell functioning. Zheng et al. demonstrated the real-time detection capability of H2O2 in HeLa cells using MoS2/RGO heterostructure FET. The sensitivity toward H2O2 increased significantly compared to pristine RGO. Hela cells generate H2O2 when reacted by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and detected by the FETs, proving the capability to detect H2O2 in complex biofluids [134].
TMD-based FET biosensors are still new in the research domain compared to well-established silicon technologies. Generally, TMDs grown at high temperatures lead to degradation of the growth substrate. One major disadvantage of this for electrical biosensors is that the 2D TMD films need to be transferred from the growth substrate to the device substrate. The transfer process is complex and chemical residue is present on the transfer samples, leading to lower quality and performance issues. There is a need for a low-temperature growth mechanism or improved transfer methods to mitigate this problem in electrical biosensors.
The charge screening effect in FET devices, defined by the Debye length, remains a big challenge. This is the maximum distance from the sensing channel, where analytes can modulate the channel conductivity. As the ionic strength increases, the Debye length decreases. The complex and high ionic strength biofluids limit the Debye length to a few nm. Although TMDs have been successfully demonstrated as selective biosensors, most studies have been done in controlled environments, and further development is required in terms of rigorous testing in complex media. Thus, applying TMD-based FETs as state-of-the-art PoC devices has a long way to go.

3.2. Electrochemical Biosensors

Electrochemical sensors are three electrode-based sensing platforms where the electrochemical reaction reduction–oxidation (redox) creates ions and charges, changing the electrochemical response. The three electrodes are the working electrode (WE), the reference electrode (RE), and the counter electrode (CE). All the potentials are measured with respect to RE, while CE completed the electrochemical cell connections. The WE is modified by nanomaterials for better electrochemical activity. The basic operating principle is the detection of Faraday current using voltammetry or amperometry and the modulation of interfacial impedance by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The WE is modified with suitable biorecognition elements for detecting specific analytes via redox reactions, which generate or suppress electrons or ions and change the current across the WE. In the case of EIS, the analytes adsorbed on the modified WE surface modulate the electrochemical current or interfacial impedance. The quantitative correlations between the change in the interfacial impedance or electrochemical current with the number of analytes give the sensing response.

3.2.1. Detection of Biomarkers

Dopamine (DA) is a neuro biomarker and plays an important role in the functioning of the neurological system. Sakthivel et al. decorated cobalt oxide polyhedrons on an MWCNT/MoS2 hybrid system by conventional hydrothermal method for electrochemical detection of DA [135]. The modified electrode showed great stability, high sensitivity and selectivity, and a low detection limit of 13 nM. The electrode retained 97% of its initial current even after 30 weeks of use, indicating its robustness. The feasibility of real-time application was tested with physiological samples, such as rat and human serum, in an optimized lab environment. As discussed earlier, miRNAs are cancer biomarkers. Su et al. used gold nanoparticle (Au NPs)-modified MoS2 to detect miRNA-21 by EIS and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) [136]. The results showed selective detection of miRNA-21 in the fM range for both methods. The miRNA-21 was added to human serum for accurate sample detection and studied with the same device. The results indicated that the Au NP decorated MoS2 was an excellent real-time detector for miRNA-21. Zhu et al. demonstrated thionine-reduced AuNP functionalized MoS2 sheets for electrochemical detection of miRNA-21 with a detection range of 1 pM to 10 nM and a detection limit of 0.26 pM [61]. Chand et al. synthesized copper ferrite-decorated MoS2 nanosheets functionalized with thiol-modified biotin for microfluidic-based electrochemical sensors to detect paratuberculosis-specific miRNAs [137]. Paratuberculosis (pTb), or Johne’s disease, is a deadly disease in dairy cattle as it is highly contagious and asymptomatic [138]. The microfluidic assisted sensing allows the screening of multiple samples simultaneously. The optimized conditions showed real-time detection of miRNA at the lowest concentration of 0.48 pM with excellent selectivity. The complex biological fluid analysis of infected blood and fecal samples helps in the detection of miRNA. This sensor also successfully detected actual samples from infected cows. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a cancer biomarker produced by colorectal cancer and found at very low concentrations [139]. Thus, sensitive and low-level detection of CEA is vital for the early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer. Wang et. al. synthesized a nanocomposite of flower-like MoS2 with rGO and Ag NPs for ultrasensitive detection of CEA [140]. Incorporating Ag NPs in MoS2-GO composite enhances the electrochemical activity manyfold because the synergistic effect between MoS2 and Ag NPs improves the sensitivity. The wide range of detection is from 0.01 pg/mL to 100 ng/mL with a detection limit of 1.6 fg/mL, which is much lower than the clinically safe limit.
Liu et al. reported an AuNP-decorated MoS2/T3C2 hybrid structure for ultrasensitive electrochemical sensing of miRNA-182, a well-known lung cancer biomarker [141]. The thiol-modified probe ssRNA was mobilized by the hybrid structure of the well-known Au–SH solid bond. Because of its negative charge, the electrochemical activity of the hybrid decreased after the ssRNA modification. The binding of the targeted miRNA-182 with the probe RNA resulted in dsRNA hybrids, which, when released from the Au NPs, increased the electrochemical activity. At optimum conditions, quantitative analysis of the RNA hybridization gave a linear detection range of 1 fM to 0.1 nM with a detection limit of 0.43 fM. MicroRNA-155 is a cancer biomarker found in ultra-low concentrations in body fluids, such as plasma, at the early stage of cancer patients [142]. Liu et al. studied the electrochemical sensing of miRNA-155 using MoS2 thin films deposited by ALD and modified by AuNPs [143]. For the selective detection of miRNA-155, thiol-modified probe RNA was attached to the MoS2 surface via SH-Au chemistry. To avoid a non-specific response, unbounded Au NPs were blocked by blocking agent 6-mercaptohexanol (MCH). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and EIS measurements of the modified electrode at different stages of the fabrication show that the Au NPs enhanced the electrical conductivity by synergistic effect and enhanced electron transfer process. After functionalization and blocking of the unreacted sites of Au NPs, the electrical conductivity decreased as the charge transfer was hindered. For the concentration-dependent study, toluidine blue (TB), a phenothiazine dye, was used as the hybridization monitor owing to the presence of π-π conjugate electron. The sensors could detect miRNA-155 ranging from 1 fM to 10 nM with a detection limit of 0.32 fM. This study indicates that the ALD-deposited MoS2 has the potential to detect actual biological samples in real time. Rawat et al. fabricated MoS2 based electrochemical biosensor to detect and quantify glutathione (GSH), a cancer biomarker [144]. For the binding of GSH, the glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzyme was used for the catalytic reduction of GSH. The sensing platform showed excellent sensitivity of 700 pA/µM with a linear response from 10 µM to 500 mM concentration of GSH.

3.2.2. Detection of Bacteria and Virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the serious public health concerns and can cause some deadly diseases, such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [145]. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) is one of the most reliable tumor biomarkers for identifying HBV infections. Gao et. al. developed an electrochemical immunosensor based on gold@palladium (Au@Pd) NP decorated MoS2 functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes (Au@Pd/MoS2@MWCNTs) [62]. The MoS2/MWCNTs hybrid composite enhanced electrochemical activity, and the incorporated Au@Pd NPs amplified the sensitivity towards HBeAg detection by synergistic effect. The sensor showed a systematic current increase with the addition of HBeAg ranging from 0.1 pg/mL to 500 pg/mL and had a detection limit of 26 fg/mL.

3.2.3. Detection of DNAs and Other Bio-Analytes

Figure 4 captures representative DNA detection using an electrochemical approach. Wang et al. demonstrated electrochemical sensing of dsDNA using thionin-functionalized MoS2 sheets as a working electrode. The electrostatic attraction of thionin to the MoS2 defect sites was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis and the redox peak at −0.27 V at square wave voltammetric measurements [146]. The redox peak current at −0.27 V decreased consistently with increasing concentration of dsDNA in the solution. The linear response was obtained from 0.09 to 1.9 ng per ml dsDNA with a detection limit of 0.09 pg/mL. Redox current decreased after the addition of complex biofluid, circulating DNA extracted from human serum, demonstrating its capability as a PoC device. Yang et al. synthesized ZnO/MoS2 hybrid nanocomposite for the electrochemical sensing of DNA with great sensitivity [147]. The hybrid composite not only helps in direct charge transfer but also in probe immobilization. The probe ssDNA is attached to the nanocomposite surface by electrostatic interaction between positively charged ZnO and negatively charged ssDNA. At an optimum environment, the DPV measurement of the modified electrode with different concentrations of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) and retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) exhibits a linear response over a wide range. The low detection limit of 0.66 fM demonstrates its potential for ultralow detection of DNA by the heterostructure.
Zhang et al. fabricated poly-xanthurenic acid (PXA) functionalized MoS2 electrochemical biosensors to detect circulating tumor DNA in blood samples [148]. The novel polymer XA has low toxicity, acceptable redox activity and good electrochemical performance. The probe ssDNA was immobilized on hybrid PXA/MoS2 nanostructure by π-π conjugate interactions. The immobilization of ssDNA on the surface decreased the current drastically due to charge transfer and blocking. With the addition of the targeted circulating tumor DNA, the ssDNA hybridized to form dsDNA. The weak interaction between PXA and dsDNA releases the DNA from the surface, restoring electrochemical activity. The quantitative analysis of the current restoration with DNA concentration shows a linear response range of 0.1 fM/l to 100 pM/l with a detection limit of 0.018 fM/L. The sensor shows excellent reproducibility. The van der Waals interaction between the ssDNA with MoS2 nanosheets was utilized by Zhou et al. for electrochemical sensing of Kanamycin, the widely used antibiotic for bacterial infections and tuberculosis [149]. In the presence of biotin-modified assist DNA, probe DNA and aptamer DNA formed a Y shape dsDNA structure, which has a very low adsorption probability with MoS2 sheets. The addition of Kanamycin aided in the binding with the aptamer DNA and breaking the Y shape of dsDNA to ssDNAs. The MoS2-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) adsorbed the ssDNA. The interactions between the biotin and streptavidin enhanced the mobilization of the biotin-modified assist DNA and probe DNA hybrid on MoS2-modified GCE. The catalytic effect between alkaline phosphatase and p-nitrophenol phosphate produced p-nitrophenol (PNP), an electrochemically active molecule. The quantitative analysis between the Kanamycin concentration and peak oxidation current showed a linear response from 0.1 nM to 100 nM. The threshold limit of detection was 0.03 nM. The Kanamycin in Kanamycin Sulfate Eye Drops was successfully detected with the sensor with less than 9% variation and remarkable selectivity. Zhang et al. synthesized WS2/graphite microfiber hybrid for the electrochemical detection of adenine and guanine. WS2 synthesis directly on graphite microfiber exhibited excellent charge transfer characteristics and electrocatalytic oxidation response. The adsorption of adenine and guanine on the WS2 surface changed its electronic and charge transfer properties. The CV analysis showed two oxidation peaks at +0.73 V and +1.03 V, corresponding to the oxidation of adenine and guanine, respectively. The concentration-dependent CV response showed a systematic increase in the reduction current due to charge transfer resulting from the adsorption on the WS2 surface. The electrochemical sensor had a linear response ranging from 0.5 µM to 20 µM concentration of adenine and guanine [150].
The partial reduction of oxygen produces H2O2 during various biological processes, which plays an essential role in signal processing and transduction of cells [151]. The imbalanced ions affect the stress in cells and eventually lead to several diseases, including cancer [152]. Wang et al. used MoS2 nanoparticles to detect H2O2 at the nM level without using any enzymes [153]. The high density of electroactive sites of MoS2 NP increases the electrochemical reduction of H2O2 and hence, improves the sensitivity along with a low detection limit. Ma et al. demonstrated H2O2 and cholesterol sensing by oxidized glutathione-modified MoS2 (MoS2-GSSG) NSs. The high affinity of MoS2-GSSG towards the 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate ensures uniform distribution. Peroxidase-like catalytic activities of MoS2-GSSG NSs convert the H2O2 into *OH, which oxidizes the TMB [154]. With this catalysis-based reaction, the detection limit was as low as 0.5 µM. Shu et al. synthesized nanoflower-like interlayer expanded MoS2 (IE-MoS2) and nonexpanded MoS2 (NE-MoS2) by thiourea-assisted hydrothermal route for electrochemical sensing of the H2O2 [155]. The GCE was modified by IE-MoS2 and NE-MoS2 to check the electrochemical performance for H2O2 detection. The IE-MoS2 modified electrode showed an enhancement in current with good sensitivity as it promoted the reduction of H2O2 to OH. Linear response with H2O2 concentration ranging from 2.3 × 10−1 to 14.2 × 103 μM was reported with remarkable selectivity in the presence of ascorbic acid (AA), glucose, sucrose, uric acid (UA), dopamine (DA), NaCl and KCl. Real-time detection of H2O2 was carried out in complex biological fluids, including living cancer cells, e.g., human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), for PoC applications.
Diabetes is one of the most common medical issues worldwide, causing many serious health problems. Blood glucose is the critical parameter for monitoring diabetes. Hence, continuous blood glucose monitoring is crucial [156]. Currently, the commercially available PoC system can detect glucose in human blood drawn by an end user from 1 to 27 mM [157]. Instead of using a blood sample, the glucose level can also be detected by the patient’s sweat and saliva, which is a non-invasive technique. However, the glucose level in sweat and saliva is in the order of µM. Thus, we need ultrasensitive sensing devices to detect glucose in sweat and saliva, which is much lower than the sensing capabilities of enzyme-based commercial systems [156,157,158,159]. TMDs have the potential for lower detection limits and can detect glucose even in the nM concentration [160]. Su et al. decorated MoS2 NSs with Au@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for the electrochemical detection of glucose in the human serum [161]. The synergistic effect of the nanoparticles enhanced the electrocatalytic activity of the modified electrode towards glucose reduction, improving the sensitivity. Glucose detection in human serum with excellent recovery and accuracy implies its application in real-time in biofluids. The low detection limit of 1.08 µM shows the capabilities for ultralow glucose detection.
From the detailed account above, we can see that electrochemical biosensors with working electrodes modified by 2D TMDs have certainly improved the detection limits with enhanced specificity. Table 2 provides a summary of TMD-based electrochemical sensors. Commercialization of PoC electrochemical devices based on TMDs has not been possible to date. The current PoC devices for blood glucose monitors and reactive ion species detectors are fully enzyme based, lagging in terms of detection limits besides being quite expensive. The utilization of high active site densities of TMDs has enhanced the detection limit, but the working environments, such as specified pH and temperature-dependent response, have restricted commercialization. Desorption of by-products is essential for reusability, which may reduce the effective cost. Synthesis methods and functionalization can tune the properties of the TMDs specific for the analyte of interest towards PoC detection.

3.3. Optical Biosensors

Optical biosensors utilize the advanced and superior optical properties of 2D TMDs to detect bioanalytes. They are some of the most sensitive biosensors and can detect even a single bioanalyte in real-time. The typical mechanisms for detection in optical biosensors include surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), fluorescence imaging, and Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). SERS measures the enhancement of the Raman signal of the samples after and before analyte adsorption on a SERS substrate. SPR strongly depends on the refractive index. Upon adsorption of the bio-analyte, there is a local change in the material’s refractive index. FRET is a nonradiative energy transfer mechanism between two fluorophores through dipole–dipole coupling. Due to its inverse sixth power law dependence, it is extremely sensitive to changes in the distance between fluorophores. Hence, modulation in the fluorescence intensity in the presence of a target analyte has been extensively used for the purpose of detection.

3.3.1. Biomarker Detection

Biomarkers, as mentioned earlier, are direct outcomes of specific biological, pathogenic, or pharmacological processes [113]. 2D TMDs, with their high density of active sites, give ultrasensitive responses as biosensors used for biomarker detection [63]. Kong et al. carried out real-time detection of a prostate cancer biomarker in human serum for the first time using aptamer-functionalized MoS2 nanosheets. When added to the dye-labeled ssDNA aptamer, there is high fluorescence (FL) quenching of MoS2 NSs. This phenomenon was utilized for the purpose of sensing [162]. The adsorption of the target-specific ssDNA on the MoS2 surface almost entirely quenches its FL spectra due to charge transfer by van der Waals interaction. The addition of the target DNA leads to the binding with probe aptamers, and thus, desorption from the MoS2 surface restores the FL intensity. The quantitative study between the FL restoration and the targeted aptamer addition shows a linear response from 0.5 to 300 ng/mL with a detection limit of 0.2 ng/mL. With its high stability and specificity to aptamers, the sensor had a very high selectivity toward targeted DNA. The ability to detect PSA in complex biofluid human serum in real-time ensures its capability to be used as a PoC device. Dhenadhayalan et al. studied the molybdenum (Mo) series of 2D materials from MoO3, MoS2 to MoSe2 NSs for real-time detection of PSA by FL quenching [163]. Among those NSs, MoO3 had the lowest detection limit of 13 pM, whereas MoS2 and MoSe2 yielded 72 and 157 pM, respectively. The low detection limit of MoO3 NSs was attributed to the relatively electronegative element O as compared to S and Se. These ultrasensitive biosensors have the potential for practical use at preliminary testing facilities. Similar to prostate cancer in males, breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and shares a high percentage among all cancer-related deaths [114]. MicroRNAs are common biomarkers for breast cancer and are used for disease diagnosis [120]. Xi et al. first showed the detection of microRNA-21 (miRNA-21) using WS2 NSs through duplex-specific nuclease signal amplification (DSNSA) [164]. The binding of the dye-labeled ssDNA onto the basal plane of WS2 NSs quenches its FL intensity by almost 97%, indicating strong charge transfer between aptamers and WS2 NSs. Binding with the targeted miRNA-21, the probe DNA formed a DNA/RNA heteroduplex which acts as the substrate for duplex-specific nuclease (DSN) cleavage. The DSN selectively cleaves the ssDNA from the heteroduplex, allowing the miR-21 to hybridize with another ssDNA. This stimulated process improved the detection limit to 300 fM with extremely high selectivity and even allowed to differentiate a single mismatch RNA.
MiRNA extracted from various cancer cell detection shows excellent agreement with the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) results, hence having the capability to use in PoC detection systems. Chi et al. demonstrated miRNA-21 sensing by ssDNA aptamer functionalized MoS2 NSs via an excellent FL quenching [165]. As reported previously, the FL of MoS2 NSs quenched on the adsorption of ssDNA on its surface. The sensing platform had a detection limit of 500 pM and distinguished even a single mismatch miRNA-21. The detection of miRNA-21 with human serum in different concentrations was demonstrated in a real-time analysis as a PoC system. Gómez et al. showed a red shift in the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of monolayer MoS2 when used for miRNA-21 detection. The thiol-modified probe ssDNA binds to the S vacancy sites and enhances the PL intensity because of charge transfer between them [166]. When the probe DNA captures complementary targeted DNA, it forms dsDNA, the PL peak shifts towards the lower energy region, and PL is quenched. Further study is needed for the concentration dependence of PL peak shift to find the sensitivity and detection limit. Lung cancer, as mentioned earlier, does not show symptoms and the biomarkers are at ultralow concentration. To detect, we need biosensors with ultralow lung cancer biomarker detection capability [114]. Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) is a well-studied biomarker for lung cancer [167]. Chiu and Yang used the principle of SPR with carboxyl-functionalized MoS2 (carboxyl-MoS2) to detect CYFRA21-1 in the human serum [63]. The sulfur vacancies in MoS2 act as attachment sites for the carboxyl group, making them more sensitive to incident light. The study showed that carboxyl-functionalized MoS2 SPR biosensor could detect breast cancer biomarker CYFRA21-1 from 0.05 pg/mL to 100 ng/mL with a detection limit of 0.05 pg/mL. The concentration-dependent measurement of CYFRA21-1 in human serum showed a detection limit corresponding to 3.125% CYFRA21-1 in human serum. Zhao et al. detected the tumor biomarker CEA by FL quenching of MoS2 NSs, on adsorption of ssDNA on its surface. The sensor had a linear response over 0.1 to 100 ng/mL with a detection limit of 300 pg/mL and an excellent selectivity [168].
Malaria is a health concern in many parts of the world and is responsible for a considerable loss of lives. The protozoan Plasmodium parasite causes malaria, and its early detection remains a big challenge. Kenry et al. used single-layer MoS2 sheets for the detection of Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) protein [169]. FL intensity of high-affinity malaria biomarker aptamer quenches almost 90% after adding MoS2 because of van der Waals interaction. The quantitative analysis shows a linear restoration of FL intensity upon serial addition of 0 to 62.5 mM pLDH protein with a detection limit of 550 pM, much lower than that of the clinically accepted safe limit of a few nM. To practically use the biosensor, several other bioanalytes ranging from insulin to globulin, were also tested for FL restoration. Results showed high selectivity towards pLDH protein and low detection limit.

3.3.2. Detection of Bacteria and Virus

Zhang et al. studied the FL quenching of 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) dye-labeled ssDNA using MoS2, TaS2, and TiS2. The adsorption of FAM dye-labeled ssDNA probe aptamer corresponding to the Influenza A virus onto the TMD surface quenches its FL intensity. Among the three TMD NSs, TaS2 has the highest quenching capability of 99% [170]. The systematic FL intensity restoration shows a linear response in the 0 to 20 nM concentration range. The TaS2-based sensor has the lowest detection limit of 0.05 nM compared to 0.1 nM for MoS2 and 0.2 nM for TiS2.

3.3.3. Detection of DNAs and Other Biomolecules

An example of DNA sensing using fluorescence quenching [66,164,171] is shown in Figure 5. Zhu et al. first demonstrated the FL quenching of single-layer MoS2 by the FRET mechanism in the vicinity of a biomolecule. The probe ssDNA has a higher affinity toward single-layer MoS2 than dsDNA; hence, the FL intensity almost quenches completely on the adsorption of ssDNA due to nonradiative energy transfer among them. Upon binding with the targeted DNA, the probe DNA hybridizes to dsDNA and detaches from the MoS2 surface, restoring the FL intensity. The quantitative study between the addition of the targeted DNA and the FL intensity restoration showed a linear relationship from 0 to 50 nM concentration range with a detection limit of 500 pM [66]. Ge et al. designed FL based aptasensor for specific detection of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and human α-thrombin in the human serum [172]. FL intensity of the probe aptamers diminished once MoS2 NSs were added because of the charge transfer. With the attachment of the targeted ATP and α-thrombin, the aptamers formed a dsDNA hybrid and detached from the MoS2 surface, resulting in FL restoration. However, even after the addition of a high concentration of targeted DNA, the FL intensity did not restore to its original value as some of the aptamers bound with MoS2 in other configurations and remained bound to the MoS2 NSs. The concentration-dependent study shows a linear response over a wide range of 0 to 2 mM for ATP. The system successfully detected ATP in human serum and from the extraction of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells, proving its application in real-time PoC devices. A detection limit of 4 µM ATP and 300 pM of thrombin was reported using a similar mechanism.
Loan et al. made a graphene-encapsulated MoS2 heterostructure-based DNA sensor using a PL enhancement study. The ssDNA attachment acts as a positive voltage gating to graphene, changing the optoelectronic properties. The biocompatible top graphene layer protects the MoS2 surface from the aqueous medium. The functional groups on the graphene surface also serve as biolinkers between the aptamers and the graphene surface. The systematic enhancement of the PL intensity with the DNA concentration shows a linear behavior from 1 aM to 1 fM concentration. A similar study with single-sequence mismatch DNA shows that the enhancement is only due to targeted binding with the probe DNA, and the sensor has excellent selectivity toward the targeted DNA [173].
Huang et al. developed a microfluidic-based DNA sensor for rapid and multiple DNA screening using single-layer MoS2 NSs [174]. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-assisted zigzag-shaped microchannel helped the screening of multiple samples simultaneously and ensured uniform mixing of ssDNA and MoS2 NSs. Using the microchannel, rapid screening of DNA can detect targeted DNA with fM concentration within a few minutes. Wang and his co-workers used Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) as a probe for DNA sensing. PNAs are similar to ssDNA, with a higher binding affinity toward targeted DNA. Similar to ssDNA, the FL intensity of probe PNA quenches entirely after adsorbing on the WS2 surface because of charge transfer among them. The restoration of FL correlated with the binding of specified targeted DNA, which was confirmed by adding a single base mismatch DNA. The result showed almost negligible restoration of FL intensity, which indicated the precise binding nature of the PNAs [175]. The linear detection capability of the sensing device was in the range of 1 nM to 20 nM with a detection limit of 500 pM. Jin et al. functionalized a single-layer MoS2 surface with thiol-modified aptamer through SH–Au bond [46]. The thiol-Au bond enhanced the adsorption of ssDNA on the surface of a single-layer MoS2. The adsorption of ssDNA modulates the local dielectric constant and affects the band energy. There is a continuous blueshift with the addition of modified aptamers. The study reveals that one can detect targeted DNA at an nM concentration level by employing PL spectroscopy measurement on a single-layer MoS2. Xi et al. synthesized thioglycolic acid (TGA) functionalized single-layer MoS2 NSs to detect dopamine. Upon the addition of DA, the FL intensity of TGA functionalized MoS2 NSs quenches. In the presence of DA, the C–O⋯H–O hydrogen bonding starts stacking single-layer MoS2 NSs and results in FL quenching as a result of the charge transfers. Dopamine interacts with the TGA functionalized MoS2 by hydrogen bonding [176]. Gao et al. demonstrated thrombin detection using Au NPs modified MoS2 NSs. The FL-based biosensor had a linear responsivity from 50 nM to 20 µM concentration of DA with a detection limit of 2.7 nM [177].
Table 3 lists the optical biosensors discussed in this review. There are currently several optical-based biosensors commercially available for quantitative and qualitative analysis of bioanalytes. The commercial sensors include chemiluminescence assays, fluorometric assays, and various forms of ELISA kits. One of the challenges includes lengthy sample preparation steps and expensive kits [178,179]. As discussed earlier, the advantages of excellent optical properties, such as tunable bandgap, high FL emission, and quenching, provide TMDs with an excellent opportunity for future label-free sensing. In general, optical sensing systems are complex compared to electrical transduction-based systems, and TMD-based biosensing is no exception either.

4. Future Perspectives

There has been enormous research on 2D TMD materials since the discovery of graphene, but their application in the healthcare domain remains largely unexplored. State-of-the-art PoC products based on TMDs have not been commercialized. There is a need for robust study regarding wafer-scale synthesis, fabrication processes, and integration with state-of-the-art modern electronic fabrication. One of the critical challenges for TMDs to compete with existing technologies is to devise a low-cost wafer-scale synthesis solution. A uniform wafer-scale synthesis is an essential criterion for mass production; otherwise, the device-to-device variation could forestall the way for a PoC sensor to the consumers. Compared to 0D and 1D materials, the planner structure of 2D TMDs makes them inherently compatible with the existing state of art fabrication technologies for biosensors. Synthesis methods, such as CVD, MOCVD, and ALD, have the potential for high-quality synthesis and hence minimal device-to-device variation.
TMDs are suitable for new-generation wearable healthcare devices with their high mechanical flexibility and stability. They are generally grown at high temperatures, but flexible polymer substrates are incompatible with direct growth. TMDs are transferred from the growth substrate to the device substrate. Currently, ultrathin TMDs are transferred using Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) based on wet chemical methods [26]. The transfer samples contain PMMA residue, which creates defects and wrinkles. There is a big challenge for efficient wafer-scale transfer of 2D TMDs without creating defects or wrinkles. Thus, an improved transfer process is needed for highly efficient device fabrications or to find a solution for low-temperature growth directly on the flexible substrate. As part of the sensing application, functionalization of the TMD surface is essential for highly selective biosensors and minimizing false positive responses. There is a need for efficient surface engineering for the attachment of bioreceptor. Enormous work has been done during the last decade, and further improvements for suitable surface modification are still needed.
Once the scientific community resolves the present technological challenges, the 2D-TMD-based sensing platform has an excellent opportunity for next-generation personalized healthcare devices. With their mechanical flexibility, ultrathin thickness, and optical transparency, 2D-TMDs have the potential to incorporate into textiles for continuous monitoring of health conditions. Two-D TMDs have already demonstrated label-free detection of bioanalytes down to aM concentration, much lower than many current technologies, suggesting tremendous potential for next-generation personalized sensing platforms. The scientific community has made enormous progress in 2D TMD-based materials for biosensing applications in the last ten years. Further development and realizations are needed for sustainable academic research and collaboration with industrial partners to achieve next-generation applications in personalized health monitoring, wearable technologies, and low-power, portable diagnostics with superior performance compared to existing technologies.

Author Contributions

A.K.M. wrote the first draft of this review paper, A.K.M., M.M., P.K.G. editing and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

PKG acknowledges financial support from MEITY, Government of India (Grant No. 5(1)/2021-NANO) and SERB, Government of India (Grant number CRG/2021/006397) for carrying out part of this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data was generated, as this is a review paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bolotin, K.I.; Sikes, K.J.; Jiang, Z.; Klima, M.; Fudenberg, G.; Hone, J.; Kim, P.; Stormer, H.L. Ultrahigh Electron Mobility in Suspended Graphene. Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Xia, F.; Mueller, T.; Lin, Y.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Avouris, P. Ultrafast Graphene Photodetector. Nat. Nanotechol. 2009, 4, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lin, Y.-M.; Jenkins, K.A.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Small, J.P.; Farmer, D.B.; Avouris, P. Operation of Graphene Transistors at Gigahertz Frequencies. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mittendorff, M.; Winnerl, S.; Kamann, J.; Eroms, J.; Weiss, D.; Schneider, H.; Helm, M. Ultrafast Graphene-Based Broadband THz Detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 021113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mueller, T.; Xia, F.; Avouris, P. Graphene Photodetectors for High-Speed Optical Communications. Nat. Photon. 2010, 4, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, B.Y.; Liu, T.; Meng, B.; Li, X.; Liang, G.; Hu, X.; Wang, Q.J. Broadband High Photoresponse from Pure Monolayer Graphene Photodetector. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yoon, H.J.; Jun, D.H.; Yang, J.H.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, S.S.; Cheng, M.M.-C. Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensor Using a Graphene Sheet. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tian, W.; Liu, X.; Yu, W. Research Progress of Gas Sensor Based on Graphene and Its Derivatives: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Justino, C.I.L.; Gomes, A.R.; Freitas, A.C.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P. Graphene Based Sensors and Biosensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 91, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De, S.; Coleman, J.N. Are There Fundamental Limitations on the Sheet Resistance and Transmittance of Thin Graphene Films? ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2713–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Dubonos, S.V.; Firsov, A.A. Two-Dimensional Gas of Massless Dirac Fermions in Graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, S.Y.; Duong, D.L.; Vu, Q.A.; Jin, Y.; Kim, P.; Lee, Y.H. Chemically Modulated Band Gap in Bilayer Graphene Memory Transistors with High On/Off Ratio. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9034–9042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, S.; Chen, J.-H.; Adam, S.; Williams, E.D.; Fuhrer, M.S. Charged Impurity Scattering in Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 041406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Huu, H.T.; Thi, X.D.N.; Van, K.N.; Kim, S.J.; Vo, V. A Facile Synthesis of MoS2/g-C3N4 Composite as an Anode Material with Improved Lithium Storage Capacity. Materials 2019, 12, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ping, J.; Fan, Z.; Sindoro, M.; Ying, Y.; Zhang, H. Recent Advances in Sensing Applications of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanosheets and Their Composites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Molaei, M.J. Two-Dimensional (2D) Materials beyond Graphene in Cancer Drug Delivery, Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy, Recent Advances and Challenges Ahead: A Review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 61, 101830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bolotsky, A.; Butler, D.; Dong, C.; Gerace, K.; Glavin, N.R.; Muratore, C.; Robinson, J.A.; Ebrahimi, A. Two-Dimensional Materials in Biosensing and Healthcare: From In Vitro Diagnostics to Optogenetics and Beyond. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9781–9810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sinha, A.; Dhanjai; Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.; Lu, X.; Chen, J.; Jain, R. MXene: An Emerging Material for Sensing and Biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ménard-Moyon, C.; Bianco, A.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Two-Dimensional Material-Based Biosensors for Virus Detection. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 3739–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garg, M.; Gupta, A.; Sharma, A.L.; Singh, S. Advancements in 2D Materials Based Biosensors for Oxidative Stress Biomarkers. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 5944–5960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zheng, W.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, H.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, X.; Pan, A. Light Emission Properties of 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Fundamentals and Applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choi, W.; Choudhary, N.; Han, G.H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y.H. Recent Development of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Their Applications. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lv, R.; Robinson, J.A.; Schaak, R.E.; Sun, D.; Sun, Y.; Mallouk, T.E.; Terrones, M. Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Beyond: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Single- and Few-Layer Nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sebastian, A.; Pendurthi, R.; Choudhury, T.H.; Redwing, J.M.; Das, S. Benchmarking Monolayer MoS2 and WS2 Field-Effect Transistors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Das, S.; Sebastian, A.; Pop, E.; McClellan, C.J.; Franklin, A.D.; Grasser, T.; Knobloch, T.; Illarionov, Y.; Penumatcha, A.V.; Appenzeller, J.; et al. Transistors Based on Two-Dimensional Materials for Future Integrated Circuits. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 786–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mawlong, L.P.; Paul, K.K.; Giri, P.K. Simultaneous Photoluminescence Enhancement in CVD Grown Single Layer MoS2 and TiO2 NRs in the MoS2@TiO2 Heterojunction. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings, Kerala, India, 3–5 January 2019; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 2082, p. 040004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhu, B.; Chen, X.; Cui, X. Exciton Binding Energy of Monolayer WS2. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mei, J.; Li, Y.-T.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, M.-M.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Zhang, G.-J. Molybdenum Disulfide Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of DNA by Employing Morpholino as Probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 110, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Sheng, Y.; Cao, G.; Yang, P.; Shan, Y.; Liao, F.; Muhammad, Z.; Bao, W.; Hu, L.; et al. High-Performance WSe2 Photodetector Based on a Laser-Induced p–n Junction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 43330–43336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, T.; Wang, C.; Gu, X.; Gong, H.; Cheng, L.; Shi, X.; Feng, L.; Sun, B.; Liu, Z. Drug Delivery with PEGylated MoS2 Nano-Sheets for Combined Photothermal and Chemotherapy of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3433–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, B.L.; Setyawati, M.I.; Chen, L.; Xie, J.; Ariga, K.; Lim, C.-T.; Garaj, S.; Leong, D.T. Directing Assembly and Disassembly of 2D MoS2 Nanosheets with DNA for Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 15286–15296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pumera, M.; Loo, A.H. Layered Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides (MoS2 and WS2) for Sensing and Biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 61, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, S.-G.; Kim, S.-H.; Park, J.; Kim, G.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Saraswat, K.C.; Kim, J.; Yu, H.-Y. Infrared Detectable MoS2 Phototransistor and Its Application to Artificial Multilevel Optic-Neural Synapse. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10294–10300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. WS2 Nanoflakes Based Selective Ammonia Sensors at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 240, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, M.; Zhong, D.; Sun, W.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Z. Ultrasensitive Monolayer MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor Based DNA Sensors for Screening of Down Syndrome. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gutiérrez, H.R.; Perea-López, N.; Elías, A.L.; Berkdemir, A.; Wang, B.; Lv, R.; López-Urías, F.; Crespi, V.H.; Terrones, H.; Terrones, M. Extraordinary Room-Temperature Photoluminescence in Triangular WS2 Monolayers. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3447–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kang, M.; Kim, B.; Ryu, S.H.; Jung, S.W.; Kim, J.; Moreschini, L.; Jozwiak, C.; Rotenberg, E.; Bostwick, A.; Kim, K.S. Universal Mechanism of Band-Gap Engineering in Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 1610–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kang, K.; Xie, S.; Huang, L.; Han, Y.; Huang, P.Y.; Mak, K.F.; Kim, C.-J.; Muller, D.; Park, J. High-Mobility Three-Atom-Thick Semiconducting Films with Wafer-Scale Homogeneity. Nature 2015, 520, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lan, C.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Li, C.; Shu, L.; Shen, L.; Li, D.; Dong, R.; Yip, S.; Ho, J.C. Wafer-Scale Synthesis of Monolayer WS2 for High-Performance Flexible Photodetectors by Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3371–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bora, A.; Mawlong, L.P.; Giri, P.K. Highly Suppressed Dark Current and Fast Photoresponse from Au Nanoparticle-Embedded, Si/Au/WS2 Quantum-Dot-Based, Self-Biased Schottky Photodetectors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 4891–4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ovchinnikov, D.; Allain, A.; Huang, Y.-S.; Dumcenco, D.; Kis, A. Electrical Transport Properties of Single-Layer WS2. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8174–8181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huiling Loo, A.; Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. Strong Dependence of Fluorescence Quenching on the Transition Metal in Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanoflakes for Nucleic Acid Detection. Analyst 2016, 141, 4654–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kim, J.; Seung, H.; Kang, D.; Kim, J.; Bae, H.; Park, H.; Kang, S.; Choi, C.; Choi, B.K.; Kim, J.S.; et al. Wafer-Scale Production of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Alloy Monolayers by Nanocrystal Conversion for Large-Scale Ultrathin Flexible Electronics. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 9153–9163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pereira, N.M.; Rezende, N.P.; Cunha, T.H.R.; Barboza, A.P.M.; Silva, G.G.; Lippross, D.; Neves, B.R.A.; Chacham, H.; Ferlauto, A.S.; Lacerda, R.G. Aerosol-Printed MoS2 Ink as a High Sensitivity Humidity Sensor. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 9388–9396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jin, K.; Xie, L.; Tian, Y.; Liu, D. Au-Modified Monolayer MoS2 Sensor for DNA Detection. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 11204–11209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. KiKrubasankar, B.; Won, Y.S.; Adofo, L.A.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, K.K. Atomic and Structural Modifications of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Various Advanced Applications. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 7707–7738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nolan, M.; O’Callaghan, S.; Fagas, G.; Greer, J.C.; Frauenheim, T. Silicon Nanowire Band Gap Modification. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Xu, M.; Liang, T.; Shi, M.; Chen, H. Graphene-Like Two-Dimensional Materials. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3766–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rao, R.; Pint, C.L.; Islam, A.E.; Weatherup, R.S.; Hofmann, S.; Meshot, E.R.; Wu, F.; Zhou, C.; Dee, N.; Amama, P.B.; et al. Carbon Nanotubes and Related Nanomaterials: Critical Advances and Challenges for Synthesis toward Mainstream Commercial Applications. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 11756–11784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. George, A.S.; Mutlu, Z.; Ionescu, R.; Wu, R.J.; Jeong, J.S.; Bay, H.H.; Chai, Y.; Mkhoyan, K.A.; Ozkan, M.; Ozkan, C.S. Wafer Scale Synthesis and High Resolution Structural Characterization of Atomically Thin MoS2 Layers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 7461–7466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chubarov, M.; Choudhury, T.H.; Hickey, D.R.; Bachu, S.; Zhang, T.; Sebastian, A.; Bansal, A.; Zhu, H.; Trainor, N.; Das, S.; et al. Wafer-Scale Epitaxial Growth of Unidirectional WS2 Monolayers on Sapphire. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 2532–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Wu, S.; Huang, X.; Zhang, H. Fabrication of Flexible MoS2 Thin-Film Transistor Arrays for Practical Gas-Sensing Applications. Small 2012, 8, 2994–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kong, L.; Li, G.; Su, Q.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Liao, G.; Sun, B.; Shi, T. Inkjet-Printed, Large-Area, Flexible Photodetector Array Based on Electrochemical Exfoliated MoS2 Film for Photoimaging. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 2200946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Quereda, J.; Kuriakose, S.; Munuera, C.; Mompean, F.J.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; Nafady, A.; Diez, E.; Frisenda, R.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Scalable and Low-Cost Fabrication of Flexible WS2 Photodetectors on Polycarbonate. npj Flex. Electron. 2022, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Majd, S.M.; Salimi, A.; Ghasemi, F. An Ultrasensitive Detection of MiRNA-155 in Breast Cancer via Direct Hybridization Assay Using Two-Dimensional Molybdenum Disulfide Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 105, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, J.; Dak, P.; Lee, Y.; Park, H.; Choi, W.; Alam, M.A.; Kim, S. Two-Dimensional Layered MoS2 Biosensors Enable Highly Sensitive Detection of Biomolecules. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, G.; Robertson, A.W.; Li, M.M.-J.; Kuo, W.C.H.; Darby, M.T.; Muhieddine, M.H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Suenaga, K.; Stamatakis, M.; Warner, J.H.; et al. MoS2 Monolayer Catalyst Doped with Isolated Co Atoms for the Hydrodeoxygenation Reaction. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sarkar, D.; Liu, W.; Xie, X.; Anselmo, A.C.; Mitragotri, S.; Banerjee, K. MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor for Next-Generation Label-Free Biosensors. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3992–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hossain, M.M.; Shabbir, B.; Wu, Y.; Yu, W.; Krishnamurthi, V.; Uddin, H.; Mahmood, N.; Walia, S.; Bao, Q.; Alan, T.; et al. Ultrasensitive WSe2 Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensor for Label-Free Detection of Cancer in Point-of-Care Applications. 2D Mater. 2021, 8, 045005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhu, D.; Liu, W.; Zhao, D.; Hao, Q.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Shi, J.; Chao, J.; Su, S.; Wang, L. Label-Free Electrochemical Sensing Platform for MicroRNA-21 Detection Using Thionine and Gold Nanoparticles Co-Functionalized MoS2 Nanosheet. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35597–35603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gao, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Feng, J.; Kong, L.; Wang, P.; Chen, Z.; Dong, Y.; Wei, Q. Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Immunosensor for Quantitative Detection of HBeAg Using Au@Pd/MoS2@MWCNTs Nanocomposite as Enzyme-Mimetic Labels. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 102, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chiu, N.-F.; Yang, H.-T. High-Sensitivity Detection of the Lung Cancer Biomarker CYFRA21-1 in Serum Samples Using a Carboxyl-MoS2 Functional Film for SPR-Based Immunosensors. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Liu, K.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, J.; Xu, T.; Wang, S.; Chang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, J.; Liu, T. MoSe2-Au Based Sensitivity Enhanced Optical Fiber Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor for Detection of Goat-Anti-Rabbit IgG. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 660–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Qiu, X.; Hildebrandt, N. Rapid and Multiplexed MicroRNA Diagnostic Assay Using Quantum Dot-Based Förster Resonance Energy Transfer. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 8449–8457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhu, C.; Zeng, Z.; Li, H.; Li, F.; Fan, C.; Zhang, H. Single-Layer MoS2-Based Nanoprobes for Homogeneous Detection of Biomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5998–6001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Singh, P.; Gupta, R.; Sinha, M.; Kumar, R.; Bhalla, V. MoS2 Based Digital Response Platform for Aptamer Based Fluorescent Detection of Pathogens. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 1501–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sun, X.; Fan, J.; Fu, C.; Yao, L.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Xiao, J. WS2 and MoS2 Biosensing Platforms Using Peptides as Probe Biomolecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Oudeng, G.; Au, M.; Shi, J.; Wen, C.; Yang, M. One-Step in Situ Detection of MiRNA-21 Expression in Single Cancer Cells Based on Biofunctionalized MoS2 Nanosheets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Park, H.; Baek, S.; Sen, A.; Jung, B.; Shim, J.; Park, Y.C.; Lee, L.P.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, S. Ultrasensitive and Selective Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensor Created by Rings of MoS2 Nanopores. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1826–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, H.; Wu, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, H. Preparation and Applications of Mechanically Exfoliated Single-Layer and Multilayer MoS2 and WSe2 Nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Paradisanos, I.; Germanis, S.; Pelekanos, N.T.; Fotakis, C.; Kymakis, E.; Kioseoglou, G.; Stratakis, E. Room Temperature Observation of Biexcitons in Exfoliated WS2 Monolayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 193102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Budania, P.; Baine, P.T.; Montgomery, J.H.; McNeill, D.W.; Neil Mitchell, S.J.; Modreanu, M.; Hurley, P.K. Comparison between Scotch Tape and Gel-Assisted Mechanical Exfoliation Techniques for Preparation of 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Flakes. Micro Nano Lett. 2017, 12, 970–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cui, Q.; Luo, Z.; Cui, Q.; Zhu, W.; Shou, H.; Wu, C.; Liu, Z.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, P.; Wei, S.; et al. Robust and High Photoluminescence in WS2 Monolayer through In Situ Defect Engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2105339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Plechinger, G.; Nagler, P.; Kraus, J.; Paradiso, N.; Strunk, C.; Schüller, C.; Korn, T. Identification of Excitons, Trions and Biexcitons in Single-Layer WS2. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)—Rapid Res. Lett. 2015, 9, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Larentis, S.; Fallahazad, B.; Tutuc, E. Field-Effect Transistors and Intrinsic Mobility in Ultra-Thin MoSe2 Layers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 223104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Shim, G.W.; Yoo, K.; Seo, S.-B.; Shin, J.; Jung, D.Y.; Kang, I.-S.; Ahn, C.W.; Cho, B.J.; Choi, S.-Y. Large-Area Single-Layer MoSe2 and Its van Der Waals Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6655–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, H.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y.; Yin, Z.; Cong, C.; He, Q.; Wang, L.; Ding, F.; Yu, T.; Zhang, H. Mechanical Exfoliation and Characterization of Single- and Few-Layer Nanosheets of WSe2, TaS2, and TaSe2. Small 2013, 9, 1974–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Wong, J.I.; Palacios, T.; Kong, J.; Yang, H.Y. Functionalized MoS2 Nanosheet-Based Field-Effect Biosensor for Label-Free Sensitive Detection of Cancer Marker Proteins in Solution. Small 2014, 10, 1101–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Özgür, D.Ö.; Özkan, G.; Atakol, O.; Çelikkan, H. Facile Ion-Exchange Method for Zn Intercalated MoS2 As an Efficient and Stable Catalyst toward Hydrogen Evaluation Reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 2398–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Deng, L.; Ding, M.; Li, J.; He, X. Perpendicular Growth of Few-Layered MoS2 Nanosheets on MoO3 Nanowires Fabricated by Direct Anion Exchange Reactions for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17764–17772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Anto Jeffery, A.; Nethravathi, C.; Rajamathi, M. Two-Dimensional Nanosheets and Layered Hybrids of MoS2 and WS2 through Exfoliation of Ammoniated MS2 (M = Mo, W). J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 1386–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhu, X.; Su, Z.; Wu, C.; Cong, H.; Ai, X.; Yang, H.; Qian, J. Exfoliation of MoS2 Nanosheets Enabled by a Redox-Potential-Matched Chemical Lithiation Reaction. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 2956–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Patel, A.B.; Machhi, H.K.; Chauhan, P.; Narayan, S.; Dixit, V.; Soni, S.S.; Jha, P.K.; Solanki, G.K.; Patel, K.D.; Pathak, V.M. Electrophoretically Deposited MoSe2/WSe2 Heterojunction from Ultrasonically Exfoliated Nanocrystals for Enhanced Electrochemical Photoresponse. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 4093–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hussain, S.; Singh, J.; Vikraman, D.; Singh, A.K.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Khan, M.F.; Kumar, P.; Choi, D.-C.; Song, W.; An, K.-S.; et al. Large-Area, Continuous and High Electrical Performances of Bilayer to Few Layers MoS2 Fabricated by RF Sputtering via Post-Deposition Annealing Method. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Shahiduzzaman, M.; Amin, N.; Muhammad, G.; Islam, M.A.; Rafiq, K.S.B.; Sopian, K. Impact of Ar Flow Rates on Micro-Structural Properties of WS2 Thin Film by RF Magnetron Sputtering. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chaudhary, N.; Khanuja, M.; Abid; Islam, S.S. Hydrothermal Synthesis of MoS2 Nanosheets for Multiple Wavelength Optical Sensing Applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 277, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wan, X.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.; Xie, F.; Zeng, X.; Xie, W.; Chen, J.; Xu, J. Controlled Electrochemical Deposition of Large-Area MoS2 on Graphene for High-Responsivity Photodetectors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1603998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cong, C.; Shang, J.; Wu, X.; Cao, B.; Peimyoo, N.; Qiu, C.; Sun, L.; Yu, T. Synthesis and Optical Properties of Large-Area Single-Crystalline 2D Semiconductor WS2 Monolayer from Chemical Vapor Deposition. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2014, 2, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, K.-J.; Zhang, J.-Z.; Shi, G.-W.; Liu, Y.-M. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheets as Supercapacitors Electrode Material. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 132, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xu, T.; Liu, Y.; Pei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Xu, J.; Wu, D.; Tian, Y.; Li, X. The Ultra-High NO2 Response of Ultra-Thin WS2 Nanosheets Synthesized by Hydrothermal and Calcination Processes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, Y.; Pei, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Xu, J.; Wu, D.; Xu, T.; Tian, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, X. Humidity Sensing Properties of the Hydrothermally Synthesized WS2-Modified SnO2 Hybrid Nanocomposite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, D.; Liu, T.; Cheng, J.; Cao, Q.; Zheng, G.; Liang, S.; Wang, H.; Cao, M.-S. Lightweight and High-Performance Microwave Absorber Based on 2D WS2–RGO Heterostructures. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Sakthivel, R.; Keerthi, M.; Chung, R.-J.; He, J.-H. Heterostructures of 2D Materials and Their Applications in Biosensing. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 132, 101024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Noori, Y.J.; Thomas, S.; Ramadan, S.; Smith, D.E.; Greenacre, V.K.; Abdelazim, N.; Han, Y.; Beanland, R.; Hector, A.L.; Klein, N.; et al. Large-Area Electrodeposition of Few-Layer MoS2 on Graphene for 2D Material Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 49786–49794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Thomas, S.; Greenacre, V.K.; Smith, D.E.; Noori, Y.J.; Abdelazim, N.M.; Hector, A.L.; de Groot, C.H.; Levason, W.; Bartlett, P.N.; Reid, G. Tungsten Disulfide Thin Films via Electrodeposition from a Single Source Precursor. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 10194–10197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zazpe, R.; Charvot, J.; Krumpolec, R.; Hromádko, L.; Pavliňák, D.; Dvorak, F.; Knotek, P.; Michalicka, J.; Přikryl, J.; Ng, S.; et al. Atomic Layer Deposition of MoSe2 Using New Selenium Precursors. FlatChem 2020, 21, 100166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zazpe, R.; Krumpolec, R.; Sopha, H.; Rodriguez-Pereira, J.; Charvot, J.; Hromádko, L.; Kolíbalová, E.; Michalička, J.; Pavliňák, D.; Motola, M.; et al. Atomic Layer Deposition of MoSe2 Nanosheets on TiO2 Nanotube Arrays for Photocatalytic Dye Degradation and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 12034–12045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, Y.; Raza, M.H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Amsalem, P.; Wahl, S.; Skrodczky, K.; Xu, X.; Lokare, K.S.; Zhukush, M.; Gaval, P.; et al. A Self-Limited Atomic Layer Deposition of WS2 Based on the Chemisorption and Reduction of Bis(t-Butylimino)Bis(Dimethylamino) Complexes. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 1881–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sperling, B.A.; Kalanyan, B.; Maslar, J.E. Atomic Layer Deposition of Al2O3 Using Trimethylaluminum and H2O: The Kinetics of the H2O Half-Cycle. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 3410–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tai, T.B.; Cao, L.; Mattelaer, F.; Rampelberg, G.; Hashemi, F.S.M.; Dendooven, J.; van Ommen, J.R.; Detavernier, C.; Reyniers, M.-F. Atomic Layer Deposition of Al2O3 Using Aluminum Triisopropoxide (ATIP): A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, H.F.; Wong, S.L.; Chi, D.Z. CVD Growth of MoS2-Based Two-Dimensional Materials. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2015, 21, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Najmaei, S.; Ajayan, P.M.; Lou, J. Large-Area Vapor-Phase Growth and Characterization of MoS2 Atomic Layers on a SiO2 Substrate. Small 2012, 8, 966–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Tao, L.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.; Chen, W.; Gui, X.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Xu, J.-B. Centimeter-Scale CVD Growth of Highly Crystalline Single-Layer MoS2 Film with Spatial Homogeneity and the Visualization of Grain Boundaries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12073–12081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yorulmaz, B.; Özden, A.; Şar, H.; Ay, F.; Sevik, C.; Perkgöz, N.K. CVD Growth of Monolayer WS2 through Controlled Seed Formation and Vapor Density. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 93, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, Z.; Chen, P.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ma, H.; Li, J.; Zhao, B.; Luo, J.; Duan, X.; Duan, X. Ultrafast Growth of Large Single Crystals of Monolayer WS2 and WSe2. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Chen, T.; Sheng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chang, R.; Wang, X.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Hou, L.; Warner, J.H. High Photoresponsivity in Ultrathin 2D Lateral Graphene:WS2:Graphene Photodetectors Using Direct CVD Growth. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 6421–6430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Qi, Z.; Zhai, X.; Jiang, X.; Xu, X.; Fan, C.; Shen, L.; Xiao, Q.; Jiang, S.; Deng, Q.; Liu, H.; et al. Epitaxy of NiTe2 on WS2 for the P-Type Schottky Contact and Increased Photoresponse. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 31121–31130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Arnold, A.J.; Razavieh, A.; Nasr, J.R.; Schulman, D.S.; Eichfeld, C.M.; Das, S. Mimicking Neurotransmitter Release in Chemical Synapses via Hysteresis Engineering in MoS2 Transistors. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3110–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cohen, A.; Patsha, A.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Kazes, M.; Ranganathan, K.; Houben, L.; Oron, D.; Ismach, A. Growth-Etch Metal–Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition Approach of WS2 Atomic Layers. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 526–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cwik, S.; Mitoraj, D.; Mendoza Reyes, O.; Rogalla, D.; Peeters, D.; Kim, J.; Schütz, H.M.; Bock, C.; Beranek, R.; Devi, A. Direct Growth of MoS2 and WS2 Layers by Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Li, J.; Naiini, M.M.; Vaziri, S.; Lemme, M.C.; Östling, M. Inkjet Printing of MoS2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6524–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Strimbu, K.; Tavel, J.A. What Are Biomarkers? Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2010, 5, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Fathi-Hafshejani, P.; Azam, N.; Wang, L.; Kuroda, M.A.; Hamilton, M.C.; Hasim, S.; Mahjouri-Samani, M. Two-Dimensional-Material-Based Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor for Detecting COVID-19 Virus (SARS-CoV-2). ACS Nano 2021, 15, 11461–11469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Park, H.; Han, G.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, H.; Jeong, S.H.; Naqi, M.; AlMutairi, A.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J.; Kim, W.; et al. Label-Free and Recalibrated Multilayer MoS2 Biosensor for Point-of-Care Diagnostics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 43490–43497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Park, H.; Lee, H.; Jeong, S.H.; Lee, E.; Lee, W.; Liu, N.; Yoon, D.S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.W. MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor-Amyloid-Β1–42 Hybrid Device for Signal Amplified Detection of MMP-9. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 8252–8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ilic, D.; Djulbegovic, M.; Jung, J.H.; Hwang, E.C.; Zhou, Q.; Cleves, A.; Agoritsas, T.; Dahm, P. Prostate Cancer Screening with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ 2018, 362, k3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Yoo, G.; Park, H.; Kim, M.; Song, W.G.; Jeong, S.; Kim, M.H.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.W.; Hong, Y.K.; Lee, M.G.; et al. Real-Time Electrical Detection of Epidermal Skin MoS2 Biosensor for Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Nano Res. 2017, 10, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Peng, Y.; Croce, C.M. The Role of MicroRNAs in Human Cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2016, 1, 15004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Zhang, Y.-J.; Li, S.; Gan, R.-Y.; Zhou, T.; Xu, D.-P.; Li, H.-B. Impacts of Gut Bacteria on Human Health and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7493–7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Qureshi, A.; Niazi, J.H. Biosensors for Detecting Viral and Bacterial Infections Using Host Biomarkers: A Review. Analyst 2021, 145, 7825–7848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Thakur, B.; Zhou, G.; Chang, J.; Pu, H.; Jin, B.; Sui, X.; Yuan, X.; Yang, C.-H.; Magruder, M.; Chen, J. Rapid Detection of Single E. Coli Bacteria Using a Graphene-Based Field-Effect Transistor Device. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 110, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Kumar, N.; Wang, W.; Ortiz-Marquez, J.C.; Catalano, M.; Gray, M.; Biglari, N.; Hikari, K.; Ling, X.; Gao, J.; van Opijnen, T.; et al. Dielectrophoresis Assisted Rapid, Selective and Single Cell Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria with G-FETs. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 156, 112123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Tan, X.; Yang, M.; Zhu, L.; Gunathilaka, G.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, P.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, M.M.-C. Ultrasensitive and Selective Bacteria Sensors Based on Functionalized Graphene Transistors. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 5514–5520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sadighbayan, D.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Ghafar-Zadeh, E. Biosensing Based on Field-Effect Transistors (FET): Recent Progress and Challenges. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 133, 116067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sengupta, J.; Hussain, C.M. Graphene-Based Field-Effect Transistor Biosensors for the Rapid Detection and Analysis of Viruses: A Perspective in View of COVID-19. Carbon Trends 2021, 2, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Moudgil, A.; Singh, S.; Mishra, N.; Mishra, P.; Das, S. MoS2/TiO2 Hybrid Nanostructure-Based Field-Effect Transistor for Highly Sensitive, Selective, and Rapid Detection of Gram-Positive Bacteria. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 1900615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lee, D.-W.; Lee, J.; Sohn, I.Y.; Kim, B.-Y.; Son, Y.M.; Bark, H.; Jung, J.; Choi, M.; Kim, T.H.; Lee, C.; et al. Field-Effect Transistor with a Chemically Synthesized MoS2 Sensing Channel for Label-Free and Highly Sensitive Electrical Detection of DNA Hybridization. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 2340–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bahri, M.; Shi, B.; Elaguech, M.A.; Djebbi, K.; Zhou, D.; Liang, L.; Tlili, C.; Wang, D. Tungsten Disulfide Nanosheet-Based Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor for DNA Hybridization Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 5035–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nam, H.; Oh, B.-R.; Chen, P.; Chen, M.; Wi, S.; Wan, W.; Kurabayashi, K.; Liang, X. Multiple MoS2 Transistors for Sensing Molecule Interaction Kinetics. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Nam, H.; Oh, B.-R.; Chen, M.; Wi, S.; Li, D.; Kurabayashi, K.; Liang, X. Fabrication and Comparison of MoS2 and WSe2 Field-Effect Transistor Biosensors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2015, 33, 06FG01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chen, X.; Hao, S.; Zong, B.; Liu, C.; Mao, S. Ultraselective Antibiotic Sensing with Complementary Strand DNA Assisted Aptamer/MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 145, 111711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zheng, C.; Jin, X.; Li, Y.; Mei, J.; Sun, Y.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, G.-J. Sensitive Molybdenum Disulfide Based Field Effect Transistor Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring of Hydrogen Peroxide. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Sakthivel, K.; Govindasamy, M.; Chen, S.; Muthumariappan, A.; Mani, V.; Chen, T.-W.; Selvaraj, S. MWCNTs/MoS2 Decorated Cobalt Oxide Polyhedrons Composite Film Modified Electrode for Electrochemical Determination of Dopamine in Rat Brain and Human Blood Serum Samples. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 7435–7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Su, S.; Cao, W.; Liu, W.; Lu, Z.; Zhu, D.; Chao, J.; Weng, L.; Wang, L.; Fan, C.; Wang, L. Dual-Mode Electrochemical Analysis of MicroRNA-21 Using Gold Nanoparticle-Decorated MoS2 Nanosheet. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chand, R.; Ramalingam, S.; Neethirajan, S. A 2D Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide MoS2 Based Novel Nanocomposite and Nanocarrier for Multiplex MiRNA Detection. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 8217–8225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sweeney, R.W. Transmission of Paratuberculosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1996, 12, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Benchimol, S.; Fuks, A.; Jothy, S.; Beauchemin, N.; Shirota, K.; Stanners, C.P. Carcinoembryonic Antigen, a Human Tumor Marker, Functions as an Intercellular Adhesion Molecule. Cell 1989, 57, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, D.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, D.; Pang, X.; Du, B.; Wei, Q. Label-Free Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on Flower-like Ag/MoS2/RGO Nanocomposites for Ultrasensitive Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Liu, L.; Wei, Y.; Jiao, S.; Zhu, S.; Liu, X. A Novel Label-Free Strategy for the Ultrasensitive MiRNA-182 Detection Based on MoS2/Ti3C2 Nanohybrids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 137, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jiang, S.; Zhang, H.-W.; Lu, M.-H.; He, X.-H.; Li, Y.; Gu, H.; Liu, M.-F.; Wang, E.-D. MicroRNA-155 Functions as an OncomiR in Breast Cancer by Targeting the Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 Gene. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 3119–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Liu, L.; Zhu, S.; Wei, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiao, S.; Yang, J. Ultrasensitive Detection of MiRNA-155 Based on Controlled Fabrication of AuNPs@MoS2 Nanostructures by Atomic Layer Deposition. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 144, 111660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Rawat, B.; Mishra, K.K.; Barman, U.; Arora, L.; Pal, D.; Paily, R.P. Two-Dimensional MoS2-Based Electrochemical Biosensor for Highly Selective Detection of Glutathione. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6937–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Da Costa Ferreira, S.; Chachá, S.G.F.; Souza, F.F.; Teixeira, A.C.; de Carvalho Santana, R.; Deghaide, N.H.S.; Rodrigues, S.; Marano, L.A.; Mendes-Junior, C.T.; Ramalho, L.N.Z.; et al. The HLA-G 14-Base Pair Deletion Allele and the Deletion/Deletion Genotype Are Associated with Persistent HBe Antigenemia in Chronic Hepatis B Infection. Hum. Immunol. 2017, 78, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wang, T.; Zhu, R.; Zhuo, J.; Zhu, Z.; Shao, Y.; Li, M. Direct Detection of DNA below Ppb Level Based on Thionin-Functionalized Layered MoS2 Electrochemical Sensors. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 12064–12069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yang, T.; Chen, M.; Kong, Q.; Luo, X.; Jiao, K. Toward DNA Electrochemical Sensing by Free-Standing ZnO Nanosheets Grown on 2D Thin-Layered MoS2. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhang, W.; Dai, Z.; Liu, X.; Yang, J. High-Performance Electrochemical Sensing of Circulating Tumor DNA in Peripheral Blood Based on Poly-Xanthurenic Acid Functionalized MoS2 Nanosheets. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 105, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhou, Y.; Li, F.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; Yin, H.; Ai, S.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Aptasensing Strategy for Kanamycin Detection Based on Target-Triggered Single-Strand DNA Adsorption on MoS2 Nanosheets and Enzymatic Signal Amplification. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 296, 126664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhang, J.; Han, D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, R.; Ji, Y.; Yu, X. Electrochemical Detection of Adenine and Guanine Using a Three-Dimensional WS2 Nanosheet/Graphite Microfiber Hybrid Electrode. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 99, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Maes, M.; Galecki, P.; Chang, Y.S.; Berk, M. A Review on the Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress (O&NS) Pathways in Major Depression and Their Possible Contribution to the (Neuro)Degenerative Processes in That Illness. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 35, 676–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Reuter, S.; Gupta, S.C.; Chaturvedi, M.M.; Aggarwal, B.B. Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Cancer: How Are They Linked? Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 1603–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Wang, T.; Zhu, H.; Zhuo, J.; Zhu, Z.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Lubarsky, G.; Lin, J.; Li, M. Biosensor Based on Ultrasmall MoS2 Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Detection of H2O2 Released by Cells at the Nanomolar Level. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10289–10295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ma, D.; Yu, J.; Yin, W.; Zhang, X.; Mei, L.; Zu, Y.; An, L.; Gu, Z. Synthesis of Surface-Modification-Oriented Nanosized Molybdenum Disulfide with High Peroxidase-Like Catalytic Activity for H2O2 and Cholesterol Detection. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 15868–15878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Shu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Cai, H.; Yang, Y.; Yu, X.; Gao, Q. Expanding the Interlayers of Molybdenum Disulfide toward the Highly Sensitive Sensing of Hydrogen Peroxide. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 6644–6653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wood, A.; O’Neal, D.; Furler, J.; Ekinci, E.I. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of the Evidence, Opportunities for Future Use and Ongoing Challenges. Intern. Med. J. 2018, 48, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Pu, Z.; Zou, C.; Wang, R.; Lai, X.; Yu, H.; Xu, K.; Li, D. A Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device by Graphene Modified Electrochemical Sensor in Microfluidic System. Biomicrofluidics 2016, 10, 011910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Guerra, S.; Luijf, Y.M.; DeVries, J.H.; Mader, J.K.; Ellmerer, M.; Benesch, C.; Heinemann, L.; Bruttomesso, D.; et al. Real-Time Improvement of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy: The Smart Sensor Concept. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Lee, H.; Hong, Y.J.; Baik, S.; Hyeon, T.; Kim, D.-H. Enzyme-Based Glucose Sensor: From Invasive to Wearable Device. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1701150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Huang, K.-J.; Liu, Y.-J.; Liu, Y.-M.; Wang, L.-L. Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoflower-Chitosan-Au Nanoparticles Composites Based Electrochemical Sensing Platform for Bisphenol A Determination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Su, S.; Lu, Z.; Li, J.; Hao, Q.; Liu, W.; Zhu, C.; Shen, X.; Shi, J.; Wang, L. MoS2–Au@Pt Nanohybrids as a Sensing Platform for Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Glucose Detection. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 6750–6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kong, R.-M.; Ding, L.; Wang, Z.; You, J.; Qu, F. A Novel Aptamer-Functionalized MoS2 Nanosheet Fluorescent Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of Prostate Specific Antigen. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Dhenadhayalan, N.; Yadav, K.; Irulappan Sriram, M.; Lee, H.-L.; Lin, K.-C. Ultra-Sensitive DNA Sensing of a Prostate-Specific Antigen Based on 2D Nanosheets in Live Cells. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 12087–12095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Xi, Q.; Zhou, D.-M.; Kan, Y.-Y.; Ge, J.; Wu, Z.-K.; Yu, R.-Q.; Jiang, J.-H. Highly Sensitive and Selective Strategy for MicroRNA Detection Based on WS2 Nanosheet Mediated Fluorescence Quenching and Duplex-Specific Nuclease Signal Amplification. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1361–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Cai, B.; Guo, S.; Li, Y. MoS2-Based Sensor for the Detection of MiRNA in Serum Samples Related to Breast Cancer. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Catalán-Gómez, S.; Briones, M.; Cortijo-Campos, S.; García-Mendiola, T.; de Andrés, A.; Garg, S.; Kung, P.; Lorenzo, E.; Pau, J.L.; Redondo-Cubero, A. Breast Cancer Biomarker Detection through the Photoluminescence of Epitaxial Monolayer MoS2 Flakes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Takada, M.; Masuda, N.; Matsuura, E.; Kusunoki, Y.; Matui, K.; Nakagawa, K.; Yana, T.; Tuyuguchi, I.; Oohata, I.; Fukuoka, M. Measurement of Cytokeratin 19 Fragments as a Marker of Lung Cancer by CYFRA 21-1 Enzyme Immunoassay. Br. J. Cancer 1995, 71, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Zhao, L.; Cheng, M.; Liu, G.; Lu, H.; Gao, Y.; Yan, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, P.; Lu, G. A Fluorescent Biosensor Based on Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheets and Protein Aptamer for Sensitive Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Kenry; Geldert, A.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Lim, C.T. Highly Sensitive and Selective Aptamer-Based Fluorescence Detection of a Malarial Biomarker Using Single-Layer MoS2 Nanosheets. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 1315–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, X.; Tan, C.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Yang, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; et al. Single-Layer Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanosheet-Based Nanosensors for Rapid, Sensitive, and Multiplexed Detection of DNA. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Rahman, M.S.; Hasan, M.R.; Rikta, K.A.; Anower, M.S. A Novel Graphene Coated Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor with Tungsten Disulfide (WS2) for Sensing DNA Hybridization. Opt. Mater. 2018, 75, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ge, J.; Ou, E.-C.; Yu, R.-Q.; Chu, X. A Novel Aptameric Nanobiosensor Based on the Self-Assembled DNA–MoS2 Nanosheet Architecture for Biomolecule Detection. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Loan, P.T.K.; Zhang, W.; Lin, C.-T.; Wei, K.-H.; Li, L.-J.; Chen, C.-H. Graphene/MoS2 Heterostructures for Ultrasensitive Detection of DNA Hybridisation. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4838–4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Huang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Ying Yang, H.; Ai, Y. A Novel Single-Layered MoS2 Nanosheet Based Microfluidic Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of DNA. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 2245–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, G.-J. A WS 2 Nanosheet-Based Platform for Fluorescent DNA Detection via PNA–DNA Hybridization. Analyst 2015, 140, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Xu, B.; Su, Y.; Li, L.; Liu, R.; Lv, Y. Thiol-Functionalized Single-Layered MoS2 Nanosheet as a Photoluminescence Sensing Platform via Charge Transfer for Dopamine Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Gao, L.; Li, Q.; Deng, Z.; Brady, B.; Xia, N.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, H. Highly Sensitive Protein Detection via Covalently Linked Aptamer to MoS2 and Exonuclease-Assisted Amplification Strategy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 7847–7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Hosseini, S.; Vázquez-Villegas, P.; Rito-Palomares, M.; Martinez-Chapa, S.O. Advantages, Disadvantages and Modifications of Conventional ELISA. In Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): From A to Z; Hosseini, S., Vázquez-Villegas, P., Rito-Palomares, M., Martinez-Chapa, S.O., Eds.; Springer Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 67–115. ISBN 978-981-10-6766-2. [Google Scholar]
  179. Bleicher, A.V.; Unger, H.W.; Rogerson, S.J.; Aitken, E.H. A Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Quantitation of Human Plasma Ferritin. MethodsX 2018, 5, 648–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Planar structure and high surface-to-volume ratio of 2D TMD; (b) 2D TMDs in photodetector applications. Reprinted with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society; (c) Mechanically flexible properties of TMDs for wearable electronics, reprinted with permission from ref. [44]. Copyrights 2021 American Chemical Society; (d) TMDs have efficient charge transfer properties, reprinted with permission from ref. [43]. Copyright 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 1. (a) Planar structure and high surface-to-volume ratio of 2D TMD; (b) 2D TMDs in photodetector applications. Reprinted with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society; (c) Mechanically flexible properties of TMDs for wearable electronics, reprinted with permission from ref. [44]. Copyrights 2021 American Chemical Society; (d) TMDs have efficient charge transfer properties, reprinted with permission from ref. [43]. Copyright 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Biosensors 13 00169 g001
Figure 2. Synthesis/growth methods for 2D TMDs (a) Hydrothermal method, a bottom-up approach for synthesizing nanomaterials where the constituent atoms react to form thin films TMDs at high pressure and temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref. [87] copyright 2018 Elsevier; (b) Liquid exfoliation method is a top-down process. The schematic shows the ion intercalations-assisted liquid exfoliation of 2D NSs. The ions moving between the layers weaken the interlayer forces, and by agitating in solution, 2D nanosheets are obtained in suspension. Reprinted with permission from ref. [82]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society; (c) Electrochemical-assisted ion intercalations specific using redox potential. Reprinted with permission from ref. [83]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society; (d) Electrochemical deposition is cost-effective for the large-area synthesis of 2D TMDs. The schematic represents the heterostructure synthesis of graphene/MoS2 thin films. Reprinted with permission from ref. [88]. Copyright 2017 John Wiley and Sons; (e) Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique is a controlled synthesis method for high-quality 2D TMDs. The schematic shows the equipment setup along with optical images of 2D TMDs grown by CVD. Reprinted with permission from ref. [89]. Copyright 2013 John Wiley and Sons; (f) Printing of 2D TMD inks. TMD NSs can be dispersed in a liquid for various printing techniques, such as inject printing, and can be printed on a flexible substrate for wearable devices, reprinted from ref. [45]. Copyright 2022 under Creative Commons.
Figure 2. Synthesis/growth methods for 2D TMDs (a) Hydrothermal method, a bottom-up approach for synthesizing nanomaterials where the constituent atoms react to form thin films TMDs at high pressure and temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref. [87] copyright 2018 Elsevier; (b) Liquid exfoliation method is a top-down process. The schematic shows the ion intercalations-assisted liquid exfoliation of 2D NSs. The ions moving between the layers weaken the interlayer forces, and by agitating in solution, 2D nanosheets are obtained in suspension. Reprinted with permission from ref. [82]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society; (c) Electrochemical-assisted ion intercalations specific using redox potential. Reprinted with permission from ref. [83]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society; (d) Electrochemical deposition is cost-effective for the large-area synthesis of 2D TMDs. The schematic represents the heterostructure synthesis of graphene/MoS2 thin films. Reprinted with permission from ref. [88]. Copyright 2017 John Wiley and Sons; (e) Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique is a controlled synthesis method for high-quality 2D TMDs. The schematic shows the equipment setup along with optical images of 2D TMDs grown by CVD. Reprinted with permission from ref. [89]. Copyright 2013 John Wiley and Sons; (f) Printing of 2D TMD inks. TMD NSs can be dispersed in a liquid for various printing techniques, such as inject printing, and can be printed on a flexible substrate for wearable devices, reprinted from ref. [45]. Copyright 2022 under Creative Commons.
Biosensors 13 00169 g002
Figure 4. (a) Electrochemical DNA sensing using MoS2, schematics representations for functionalization of MoS2; (b) Label-free electrochemical detection of miRNA-21 using Au NP decorated MoS2 NSs, schematic representations for working electrode modifications; (c) Ag NPs decorated MoS2/rGO hybrid NSs for electrochemical sensing of carcinoembryonic antigen schematic representation; (d) electrochemical sensing response at different concentrations of DNA; (e) electrochemical response at different concentrations of miRNA-21 in the electrochemical cell; (f) Nyquist plots; (g) calibration curve for DNA detection; (h) miRNA-21 calibration curve; (i) calibration curve for CEA detection. (a,d,g) reprinted with permission from ref. [146], Copyrights 2014 American Chemical Society. (b,e,h) reprinted with permission from ref. [61], Copyrights 2017 American Chemical Society. (c,f,i) reprinted with permission from ref. [140], Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (a) Electrochemical DNA sensing using MoS2, schematics representations for functionalization of MoS2; (b) Label-free electrochemical detection of miRNA-21 using Au NP decorated MoS2 NSs, schematic representations for working electrode modifications; (c) Ag NPs decorated MoS2/rGO hybrid NSs for electrochemical sensing of carcinoembryonic antigen schematic representation; (d) electrochemical sensing response at different concentrations of DNA; (e) electrochemical response at different concentrations of miRNA-21 in the electrochemical cell; (f) Nyquist plots; (g) calibration curve for DNA detection; (h) miRNA-21 calibration curve; (i) calibration curve for CEA detection. (a,d,g) reprinted with permission from ref. [146], Copyrights 2014 American Chemical Society. (b,e,h) reprinted with permission from ref. [61], Copyrights 2017 American Chemical Society. (c,f,i) reprinted with permission from ref. [140], Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Biosensors 13 00169 g004
Figure 5. (a) DNA sensing using high fluorescence quenching properties of single-layer MoS2 NSs, Schematic representation; (b) Detection of miRNA using fluorescence quenching properties of WS2 NSs, Schematic of working principle; (c) Surface plasmon resonance-based DNA detector using graphene/WS2 hybrid structure, sensing platform schematic; (d) fluorescence intensity variation with DNA concentration; (e) response at different concentrations of miRNA; (f) response with targeted DNA; (g) Calibration curve for DNA sensing; (h) Calibration curve for miRNA detection; (i) response with non-targeted DNA. (a,d,g) reprinted with permission from ref. [66]. Copyrights 2013 American Chemical Society. (b,e,h) reprinted with permission from ref. [164]. Copyrights 2014 American Chemical Society. (c,f,i) reprinted with permission from ref. [171]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 5. (a) DNA sensing using high fluorescence quenching properties of single-layer MoS2 NSs, Schematic representation; (b) Detection of miRNA using fluorescence quenching properties of WS2 NSs, Schematic of working principle; (c) Surface plasmon resonance-based DNA detector using graphene/WS2 hybrid structure, sensing platform schematic; (d) fluorescence intensity variation with DNA concentration; (e) response at different concentrations of miRNA; (f) response with targeted DNA; (g) Calibration curve for DNA sensing; (h) Calibration curve for miRNA detection; (i) response with non-targeted DNA. (a,d,g) reprinted with permission from ref. [66]. Copyrights 2013 American Chemical Society. (b,e,h) reprinted with permission from ref. [164]. Copyrights 2014 American Chemical Society. (c,f,i) reprinted with permission from ref. [171]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Biosensors 13 00169 g005
Table 2. Summary of TMD-based electrochemical biosensors.
Table 2. Summary of TMD-based electrochemical biosensors.
MatrixMethodTarget AnalyteLinear RangeLoDReference
MWCNT/MoS2CVDopamine2150–5540 µM13 nM[135]
MoS2ESI and DPVmiRNA-2110 fM–1 nM0.45 fM and 0.78 fM[136]
MoS2SWVmiRNA-211 pM–10 nM0.26 pM[61]
MoS2SWVmiRNA1 pM–1.5 nM0.48 pM[137]
MoS2-GOCVCEA0.01 pg/mL–100 ng/mL1.6 fg/mL[140]
MoS2/T3C4DPVmiRNA-1821 fM–0.1 nM0.43 fM[141]
MoS2CVmiRNA-1551 fM–10 nM0.32 fM[143]
MoS2ElectricalGSH10 µM–500 mM10 µM[144]
MoS2@MWCNTsEISHBeAg0.1–500 pg/mL26 fg/mL[62]
MoS2SWVDNA0.09–1.9 ng/mL0.09 pg/mL[146]
ZnO/MoS2DPVDNA1 fM–1 µM0.66 fM[147]
MoS2CVDNA0.1 fM–100 pM0.018 fM[148]
MoS2DPVKanamycin0.1–100 nM0.03 nM[149]
WS2/GraphiteCVAdenine/Guanine0.5–20 µM50 nM and 90 nM[150]
MoS2CVH2O25 nM–100 nM2.5 nM[153]
MoS2AbsorbanceH2O20.5–50 µM0.5 µM[154]
MoS2CVH2O20.23 µM–14.2 mM0.2 µM[155]
MoS2CVGlucose10 µM–3 mM1.08 µM[161]
Table 3. Summary of TMD-based electrochemical biosensors.
Table 3. Summary of TMD-based electrochemical biosensors.
MatrixMethodTarget AnalyteLinear RangeLoDReference
MoS2FLPSA0.5–300 ng/mL0.2 ng/ml[162]
MoS2 and MoSe2FLPSA0.2–100 nM72 pM and 157 pM[163]
WS2FLmiRNA-211 pM–100 nM300 fM[164]
MoS2FLmiRNA-210–40 nM500 pM[165]
MoS2PLmiRNA-21 [166]
MoS2SPRCYFRA21-10.05 pg/mL–100 ng/mL0.05 pg/ml[63]
MoS2FLCEA0.1–100 ng/mL300 pg/ml[168]
MoS2FLpLDH0–62.5 mM550 pM[169]
MoS2, TaS2, and TiS2FLDNA0–20 nM0.1 nM, 0.05 nM and 0.2 nM[170]
MoS2FLDNA0–50 nM500 pM[66]
MoS2FLATP and α-Thrombin0–2 mM for ATP 4 µM and 300 pM[172]
Graphene/MoS2PLDNA1 aM–1 fM1 aM[173]
MoS2FLDNA0–20 nM500 pM[174]
WS2FLDNA1–20 nM500 pM[175]
MoS2PLDNA1 nM–20 µM1 nM[46]
MoS2FLDA0.05–20 µM27 nM[176]
MoS2FLThrombin500 fM–20 nM6 fM[177]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mia, A.K.; Meyyappan, M.; Giri, P.K. Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Based Biosensors: From Fundamentals to Healthcare Applications. Biosensors 2023, 13, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020169

AMA Style

Mia AK, Meyyappan M, Giri PK. Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Based Biosensors: From Fundamentals to Healthcare Applications. Biosensors. 2023; 13(2):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mia, Abdul Kaium, M. Meyyappan, and P. K. Giri. 2023. "Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Based Biosensors: From Fundamentals to Healthcare Applications" Biosensors 13, no. 2: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020169

APA Style

Mia, A. K., Meyyappan, M., & Giri, P. K. (2023). Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Based Biosensors: From Fundamentals to Healthcare Applications. Biosensors, 13(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop