Background: The availability of comprehensive data on the ecology and molecular epidemiology of
Staphylococcus aureus/MRSA in wild animals is necessary to understand their relevance in the “One Health” domain.
Objective: In this study, we determined the pooled prevalence of nasal, tracheal and/or oral (NTO)
Staphylococcus aureus (
S. aureus) and methicillin-resistant
S. aureus (MRSA) carriage in wild animals, with a special focus on
mecA and
mecC genes as well as the frequency of MRSA and methicillin susceptible
S. aureus (MSSA) of the lineages CC398 and CC130 in wild animals.
Methodology: This systematic review was executed on cross-sectional studies that reported
S. aureus and MRSA in the NTO cavities of wild animals distributed in four groups: non-human primates (NHP), wild mammals (WM, excluding rodents and NHP), wild birds (WB) and wild rodents (WR). Appropriate and eligible articles published (in English) between 1 January 2011 to 30 August 2021 were searched for from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SciElo and Web of Science.
Results: Of the 33 eligible and analysed studies, the pooled prevalence of NTO
S. aureus and MRSA carriage was 18.5% (range: 0–100%) and 2.1% (range: 0.0–63.9%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of
S. aureus/MRSA in WM, NHP, WB and WR groups was 15.8/1.6, 32.9/2.0, 10.3/3.4 and 24.2/3.4%, respectively. The prevalence of
mecC-MRSA among WM/NHP/WB/WR was 1.64/0.0/2.1/0.59%, respectively, representing 89.9/0.0/59.1/25.0% of total MRSA detected in these groups of animals.The MRSA-CC398 and MRSA-CC130 lineages were most prevalent in wild birds (0.64 and 2.07%, respectively); none of these lineages were reported in NHP studies. The MRSA-CC398 (mainly of
spa-type t011, 53%), MRSA-CC130 (mainly of
spa types t843 and t1535, 73%), MSSA-CC398 (
spa-types t571, t1451, t6606 and t034) and MSSA-CC130 (
spa types t843, t1535, t3625 and t3256) lineages were mostly reported.
Conclusion: Although the global prevalence of MRSA is low in wild animals,
mecC-mediated resistance was particularly prevalent among MRSA isolates, especially among WM and WB. Considering the genetic diversity of MRSA in wild animals, they need to be monitored for effective control of the spread of antimicrobial resistance.
Full article